Ewa Apartments
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ewa Apartments
Building Overview
Ewa Apartments in Ewa, built 1971; pets and short-term rentals not allowed, management company unknown.
About Ewa Apartments
Ewa Apartments is located in the Ewa neighborhood and was built in 1971. According to available records, specific building size and construction type are not listed in the provided MLS data.
Key policies noted in the MLS data include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The MLS information does not list amenities, unit mix, or common-area features.
Details such as parking provisions, maintenance fees, condominium association contact, and the management company are not provided in the MLS extract (management company listed as unknown). This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or condominium association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
County records and the state registration both report 2 floors, and the highest MLS floor field is 2. No penthouse or unit-number evidence contradicts this.
The county parcel records consistently report 205 residential units, and the state registration independently reports 205 units for this single-building registration. The current value is supported.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 341. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
I searched for explicit elevator references such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," and "multiple elevators." None of the public remarks mention elevators, so the number is unknown and cannot be inferred from the building context.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Fourteen of 20 current listings include OTCOEX, supporting inclusion of common-area expenses. The remarks do not explicitly mention common-area electricity or building power, so this conclusion relies primarily on the repeated MLS inclusion code rather than independent agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports that hot water is not included in the maintenance fee. At least five remarks reference unit-level water heaters, including "new electric water heater," "tankless water heater," and "water heater that was recently replaced," while only one current MLS record checks HOTWAT.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Eleven of 20 current listings include SEWER, supporting sewer inclusion at the building level. However, multiple remarks say "additional water and sewer separately metered," "Owner pays water/sewer," or that a sub-meter is billed separately, suggesting agent or unit-level inconsistencies rather than uniformly strong remark confirmation.
Nine of 20 current listings include WATER, providing moderate support for water being included in maintenance fees. Several listings explicitly state that water is separately metered or owner-paid, so the evidence is less consistent than for sewer and may reflect listing-entry errors or varying billing arrangements.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 20 listing remarks mention a lanai, patio, or similar outdoor space, including multiple explicit descriptions such as "large covered lanai," "private, covered patio," and "private enclosed patio perfect for entertaining." The consistency across many listings outweighs the apparent MLS checkbox underreporting and indicates this is a building-level feature available in at least some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is mentioned across many listings, not just one, with roughly 8+ remarks referencing it in some form. Key phrases include 'additional storage,' 'lockable storage,' 'storage shed,' 'storage area,' 'extra storage spaces,' and 'storage under the stairs,' suggesting the feature is commonly available in this building. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the historical MLS storage indicators.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building: at least 10 current or recent listings explicitly mention a washer, dryer, or both, with phrases such as “in-unit washer & dryer,” “washer/dryer,” and “full-size washer and dryer.” The evidence is reinforced by 18/20 MLS inclusion records and remarks from multiple agents, so this is not merely an isolated checkbox or apparent copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across the building: 19 of 20 current listings include a parking-related MLS feature, and numerous remarks from different listings mention parking stalls, guest parking, street parking, or parking close to the unit. The consistency across multiple agents and explicit descriptions confirms that the building offers parking.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and repeated remarks, with 16 of 20 listings marked ASSIGN and at least 15 listings explicitly describing an assigned, dedicated, or designated stall. The repeated phrases "assigned parking stall" and "dedicated parking stall" across multiple listings confirm this is a building-level offering rather than an isolated or copied claim.
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention an assigned or dedicated parking stall, such as "assigned parking stall" and "one dedicated parking spot." Assigned parking does not establish deeded ownership, and no explicit deeded-parking language was found.
No analysis available
The remarks mention assigned, guest, street, and pass-based parking but do not identify a monthly parking fee, parking rental charge, or additional parking cost. Therefore, no public-remarks evidence supports a parking fee.
Guest parking is confirmed by several listings and is consistent with the MLS data. Remarks from multiple agents reference guest parking directly, including a specific count of "7 guest stalls" in one listing and other notes about guest parking nearby or available. The feature appears to be real and recurring, not a one-off claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly explain existing parking arrangements, including assigned stalls, guest parking, street parking, and parking passes. No listing mentions a parking waitlist or joining a waiting list.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 1 current listing explicitly mentions "overnight security for peace of mind," confirming on-site security service. The evidence is consistent with the previously high-confidence determination, while the low current checkbox frequency may reflect incomplete or inconsistent agent entry rather than absence of the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 6 listings explicitly mention window AC or equivalent wording, while several others describe individual AC units, AC in every bedroom, or three ACs. The evidence is strong across multiple listings and aligns with the historical high-confidence determination and current MLS data showing 13/20 listings with ACWIUN.
Across the provided listings, 0 remarks explicitly mention concrete construction. The evidence is limited to MLS checkbox data in some records, which is not enough to validate the feature from public remarks alone.
0 listings mention double-wall construction or use equivalent language. The feature appears in 6/20 current MLS construction fields, but this isolated checkbox evidence conflicts with the historical absence and has no corroboration across listing remarks, so it is omitted as likely MLS checkbox error.
No analysis available
0 of 20 listings mention masonry, stucco, or masonry-and-stucco construction in the public remarks. The only support is the MASSTU checkbox in 9/20 MLS records, without corroborating descriptions from multiple agents, so the feature is omitted as likely unverified MLS data.
No analysis available
There are no explicit references to a concrete slab or similar foundation in the supplied listing remarks. The feature remains unverified from public remarks despite some MLS data entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the public remarks describe the building as above-ground constructed or use similar language. Because only 5/20 MLS listings are checked and there is no supporting agent commentary, this looks unverified and likely erroneous in the MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for short-term rental, vacation rental, STR, NUC, TVU, legal rental, and minimum-stay language. No positive authorization or explicit prohibition was found, so STR is treated as false based on the absence of supporting public-remarks evidence.
The listings contain no references to a hotel rental pool, hotel rental program, hotel management, or branded hotel pool. Because STR is not supported, the prerequisite for hotel-pool participation is also not met.
The remarks contain no language requiring units to participate in a hotel rental program or preventing owners from opting out. Since STR and hotel-pool participation are not supported, mandatory pool participation must be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold status, land lease expiration, ground lease terms, renewal language, and specific expiry years. None of those terms or any 4-digit lease-expiry year were found.
The remarks directly identify the unit as VA eligible, which is strong evidence that VA financing is accepted in the building. No conflicting financing information appears in the remarks.
I searched for insurance-related language including "fully insured," "full insurance," "comprehensive building insurance," and "walls-in coverage." The remarks do not mention HOA insurance coverage or explicitly deny it, so full insurance is unconfirmed.
No analysis available
I searched for statements indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE approval, fire-safety certification, life-safety compliance, or a passed fire inspection. No such statements or explicit denials were found in the remarks, so this remains unconfirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 20 listings mention sunset views or related phrases such as “evening sun” or “western exposure.” The repeated remarks focus on lanais, beaches, parks, and convenience, while most MLS view descriptions explicitly state NONE, providing strong multi-listing evidence against this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One listing explicitly states that the community has a “Site Manager,” while 8 of 20 recent listings list RESMAN in the amenities. The repeated checkbox evidence across multiple listings is moderately supportive, though some may be copied forward and only one remark directly confirms the manager’s presence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.