
Diamond Head Surf
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Diamond Head Surf
Building Overview
Diamond Head Surf in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis — concrete building with pool and BBQ, resident manager on-site.

About Diamond Head Surf
Diamond Head Surf is located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood and was built in 1959. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count details are not provided in the MLS data.
The building's listed amenities include a pool, a BBQ area, and a resident manager. Air conditioning is by window units. Short-term rentals are not allowed, and pets are not permitted per the available information.
Parking is reported as available. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data provided; buyers should verify all building features, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to making any decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
There is no statement in the remarks about the percentage of owner-occupied units. Because there is no prior/current numeric value and no explicit remark, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown (null) with low confidence.
Remarks make no reference to any elevators. In the absence of any explicit mention and with no prior data, this is reported as false with medium confidence (absence in remarks suggests the feature is likely not highlighted or present).
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks mention common area electricity. CURRENT MLS has OTCOEX checked in 4 of 8 listings but there is no historical confirmation and agent copy/paste is likely; evidence is inconsistent across agents, so common-area electric inclusion is omitted pending stronger confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks do not state 'gas included' in maintenance fees. CURRENT MLS has GAS checked in 3/8 listings but lack of remarks and absent historical confirmation suggest the checkbox may be agent-entered and not a verified building policy.
No listings mention 'hot water included' and HOTWAT is absent in all 8 MLS association_fee_includes entries. Additionally, 4 of 8 listings list WTRHTR (water heater) in inclusions, strongly indicating units have individual hot water heaters and hot water is not covered by the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes. This matches prior high-confidence information that sewer is a consistent, building-level included maintenance fee across multiple listings/agents.
All 8 current MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes. Historical data also showed high confidence that water is included, and multiple agents consistently report it, supporting that water is a building-level included fee.
Confidence 70%: One of two current MLS listings checks BBQ in amenities, suggesting a shared BBQ area is available though not consistently reported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current MLS listings include pool-related amenity codes and the public remarks repeatedly reference a pool—phrases include "Enjoy access to a refreshing pool" and "swimming pool." The pool mention is consistent across multiple listings/agents (likely some copy-paste), providing strong evidence the building has a shared swimming pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current MLS listings list COMLAU and several public remarks explicitly state shared laundry (e.g., "on-site Resident Mgr, ... laundry", "BBQ area, on site laundry", and "Amenities: ... Community Laundry"). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so the building very likely has community/shared laundry facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings and remarks confirm building parking: public remarks state 'one dedicated parking stall', '1 assigned parking', and 'assigned parking' in several listings. MLS checkbox data also indicates parking (OPEN/COVERED/GARAGE/ASSIGN variants) in 6/8 current listings, providing strong evidence the building offers parking.
Assigned parking is repeatedly mentioned across listings: phrases include 'assigned parking', '1 assigned parking', and 'one dedicated parking stall'. MLS checkbox data also shows ASSIGN for the majority (6/8) of current listings, indicating assigned/reserved parking is offered in the building.
No analysis available
Listings repeatedly mention 'assigned' or 'dedicated'/ 'assigned parking', which indicates a reserved stall but does not explicitly state the parking is deeded. Because 'deeded' or 'owned' parking is not claimed, I treat deeded parking as not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or 'parking rental' and found none. The presence or amount of a parking fee cannot be determined from these listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for wording indicating a waitlist system for parking but found no such references. Absence of mention suggests no advertised waitlist in these public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS inclusions list ACWIUN in 5 of 8 current listings and prior confidence was High (88%), indicating some units have window air conditioners. Public remarks contain no explicit 'window unit' phrasing, though one listing notes 'AC for hot summer days.' Evidence is strong across multiple listings (likely some agent copy/paste of the checkbox), so the building is reported as offering window AC units.
Strong evidence for concrete construction: 6 of 8 current MLS listings list CONCRE and prior analysis rated concrete as high confidence. The public remarks for this unit do not explicitly mention materials (no phrases like 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete'), but multiple agents' MLS checkboxes consistently indicate concrete construction.
No analysis available
Moderately strong evidence for hollow tile construction: 5 of 8 current MLS listings list HOLTIL and prior confidence was high. The public remarks reviewed here do not reference 'hollow tile' explicitly, but multiple agents' MLS data consistently include hollow tile as a construction material.
Limited evidence for masonry and stucco: 3 of 8 current MLS listings include MASSTU in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks for this unit mention 'masonry' or 'stucco'. The feature is possible based on MLS entries but lacks confirmation in agent remarks and may be copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Some evidence for 'above ground' construction: 5 of 8 current MLS listings include ABOGRO, but the public remarks here do not reference 'above ground' materials or construction. The MLS checkbox prevalence suggests the attribute may apply to the building, though agent remarks do not directly confirm it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR policy language (allowed/permitted or prohibited) and found none. Marketing phrases like 'vacation getaway' are not sufficient to conclude STRs are permitted, so STR allowance is treated as not evidenced.
I looked for phrases such as 'hotel rental pool', 'part of hotel operations', or hotel brand management; none were found. Because STR allowance is not evidenced, hotel-pool participation is also not supported.
I searched for wording like 'mandatory hotel pool' or 'required to participate' and found none. With no evidence of an STR program or hotel pool, there is no indication of mandatory rental-pool participation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit leasehold language or a 4-digit lease expiry year (e.g., 'lease expires 2050' or 'land lease to 2065') and found none. The land tenure/lease expiry is unknown from these remarks.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. No evidence in these listings indicates VA loan approval.
Public remarks do not state that the HOA provides full (walls-in) insurance or similar coverage. Given no explicit mention and no prior data, reported as false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
There is no language in the public remarks indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation. With no explicit statement and no prior data, returned as false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of eight current MLS view fields lists DIAHEA and the public remarks heavily reference Diamond Head (phrases include "RARE DIAMOND HEAD FIND" and "base of Diamond Head"). While many remarks emphasize proximity rather than explicitly saying "Diamond Head view," the MLS checkbox plus multiple agent remarks imply some units offer Diamond Head sightlines. Evidence is present but somewhat implied across listings, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of eight MLS view entries list GARDEN and the remarks reference a "community garden" (and a city/county community garden across the street). Remarks tend to describe on-site or nearby garden amenities rather than clearly stating 'garden view,' so inclusion is based on MLS entries and implied garden presence—evidence is moderate but not definitive.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 86%: No current listings mark SUNSET in the view_descriptions and the remarks, while highlighting location and lifestyle, do not mention sunset views at all, suggesting this is not a recognized view feature for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple MLS listings (5 of 8) include RESMAN in amenities, and the public remarks for this listing explicitly state 'on-site Resident Mgr'. The evidence is consistent across several agents and is directly mentioned in remarks rather than only appearing as a lone checkbox, supporting inclusion of a resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.