Diamond Head Surf
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Diamond Head Surf
Building Overview
Diamond Head Surf in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis — concrete building with pool and BBQ, resident manager on-site.
About Diamond Head Surf
Diamond Head Surf is located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood and was built in 1959. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count details are not provided in the MLS data.
The building's listed amenities include a pool, a BBQ area, and a resident manager. Air conditioning is by window units. Short-term rentals are not allowed, and pets are not permitted per the available information.
Parking is reported as available. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data provided; buyers should verify all building features, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to making any decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for numeric owner-occupancy data or descriptive statements about the owner-occupied share of units, but there were no references. With no explicit percentage in the remarks, this feature remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references and found none. Since elevator count is rarely included in MLS remarks and no current value was provided, this remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks mention common area electricity. CURRENT MLS has OTCOEX checked in 4 of 8 listings but there is no historical confirmation and agent copy/paste is likely; evidence is inconsistent across agents, so common-area electric inclusion is omitted pending stronger confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks do not state 'gas included' in maintenance fees. CURRENT MLS has GAS checked in 3/8 listings but lack of remarks and absent historical confirmation suggest the checkbox may be agent-entered and not a verified building policy.
No listings mention 'hot water included' and HOTWAT is absent in all 8 MLS association_fee_includes entries. Additionally, 4 of 8 listings list WTRHTR (water heater) in inclusions, strongly indicating units have individual hot water heaters and hot water is not covered by the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 current MLS listings list 'SEWER' in association fee includes, matching prior high-confidence historical data that sewer is consistently included. Public remarks do not explicitly state 'sewer included' (agents often omit such specifics), but the uniform MLS checkbox across multiple listings and historical consistency provide strong evidence sewer is included in the maintenance fee.
All 9 current MLS listings list 'WATER' in association fee includes, consistent with prior high-confidence historical data indicating water is included. Public remarks do not explicitly say 'water included,' but the consistent MLS entries across listings and strong historical evidence support that water is included in the maintenance fee.
Strong evidence that the building offers BBQ facilities: at least six separate public-remark segments explicitly mention 'BBQ', 'BBQ area', or 'BBQ facilities' (e.g., 'Residents enjoy... BBQ area', 'swimming pool, BBQ, shaded lounge areas', 'Amenities: Swimming Pool, BBQ, Community Laundry'). This matches the MLS checkbox prevalence (7/10), and multiple agents independently reference the BBQ rather than a single isolated copy/paste, supporting a high-confidence inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 10 current MLS listings include PATDEC/COVPAT in amenities, but none of the public remarks explicitly say 'patio', 'deck', 'lanai', or 'covered patio'. Remarks reference BBQ areas and shaded lounge/outdoor spaces, which is suggestive but not explicit. Given the mixed checkbox data and lack of explicit mentions, the feature is possible but uncertain—buyers should verify.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Insufficient evidence that the building has a distinct recreation area: public remarks (multiple listings) list pool, BBQ, laundry, bike racks, community garden and shaded lounge areas but do not mention a 'recreation area' or 'rec area'. With only 1/10 MLS checkboxes indicating this amenity and no supporting remarks, there is weak evidence for including recreation_area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention building storage: public remarks include phrases like 'additional storage', 'storage', and 'storage, community garden' across several agent listings. MLS amenity checkboxes are set in 2 of 10 listings (and 1 listing includes STORAG in unit_features), providing corroborating but not universal support, so confidence is moderate-high rather than definitive.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building has a swimming pool: MLS amenity codes are present on all 10 current listings and multiple public remarks across different listings explicitly state "swimming pool" or "Enjoy access to a refreshing pool." Mentions are consistent across agents and reinforced by the uniform MLS checkbox data, indicating high confidence this is a building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Highly consistent evidence across listings: 10/10 current MLS entries list COMLAU and several public remarks explicitly state 'community laundry' or 'on-site laundry' (e.g., 'community laundry', 'on site laundry'). The repetition across many listings suggests this is a real building-level amenity rather than isolated agent copy/paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers parking: current MLS data shows parking features checked on 7/10 listings and several public remarks explicitly mention a parking stall. Remarks include phrases like 'one assigned parking stall' and 'one dedicated parking stall', and the statements are repeated across multiple agent listings, indicating the feature is widely offered rather than a single listing error.
Assigned parking is consistently reported: 7/10 current MLS listings include ASSIGN and multiple public remarks state 'one assigned parking stall', '1 assigned parking', or 'one dedicated parking stall'. The repeated, specific language across many listings supports that parking stalls are assigned/reserved rather than generic or unassigned spots.
No analysis available
The listings consistently indicate assigned or dedicated parking, which suggests a reserved stall but not necessarily deeded ownership. Since 'deeded parking' is never explicitly stated, I am not marking it as true.
No analysis available
I searched for wording about parking rent, monthly parking fees, or additional parking costs and found none. The remarks only mention assigned/dedicated parking, not whether it costs extra.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a parking waitlist, joining a waitlist, or waiting for parking and found nothing. The remarks instead describe parking as assigned or dedicated in the unit listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 10 recent MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion (historical high confidence). In the collected public remarks at least one listing explicitly references '...or AC for hot summer days,' and several listings mention natural cross-breezes—together these confirm that some units have AC/window-type units. Evidence is strong across MLS checkbox data and is not contradicted in remarks, so the building is reported as offering window AC units.
Strong evidence the building is concrete: 7 of 9 current MLS listings list CONCRE and prior analysis rated concrete as high confidence. Public remarks across multiple listings do not mention structure type or any recent structural change, and there are no agent corrections noted, so the MLS checkbox data supports retaining concrete = true.
No analysis available
Moderately strong evidence the building includes hollow tile construction: 6 of 9 current MLS listings list HOLTIL and prior analysis rated hollow tile as high confidence. Public remarks do not reference structural changes or agent corrections, so the MLS checkbox prevalence and historical analysis indicate hollow tile = true.
Limited evidence for masonry and stucco: 3 of 8 current MLS listings include MASSTU in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks for this unit mention 'masonry' or 'stucco'. The feature is possible based on MLS entries but lacks confirmation in agent remarks and may be copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Some evidence for 'above ground' construction: 5 of 8 current MLS listings include ABOGRO, but the public remarks here do not reference 'above ground' materials or construction. The MLS checkbox prevalence suggests the attribute may apply to the building, though agent remarks do not directly confirm it.
Three of ten current MLS listings include BRICK in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks mention 'brick,' 'brick exterior,' or similar phrasing. Because only a minority of listings check the box and remarks are silent on brick, this likely reflects inconsistent agent reporting; included with low confidence so buyers searching for brick construction are aware it may exist but verification is recommended.
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related terms such as 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', or 'NUC' and found no explicit policy language. Marketing phrases like 'vacation getaway' are not enough to confirm STR is allowed.
I looked for hotel pool language such as 'hotel rental pool', 'managed by hotel', or branded rental programs and found none. Since STR is not confirmed from the remarks, there is no basis to mark a hotel pool as present.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation, inability to opt out, or required rental-program enrollment and found nothing. There is also no evidence of any hotel-pool program in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for ground lease language and 4-digit expiry years such as 'lease expires 2050' or 'lease ends 2065' and found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence to identify a lease expiry year.
I searched the remarks for VA loan approval language and found none. Because there is no explicit statement that VA financing is accepted, I cannot mark the building as VA-approved from these listings.
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance language such as fully insured or walls-in coverage and found none. Because this is only determined from public remarks, the insurance status remains unconfirmed.
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for any indication that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or fire inspection, but nothing was stated. Without explicit public remark evidence, I cannot infer this status.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings (multiple agents) highlight Diamond Head repeatedly — phrases include 'RARE DIAMOND HEAD FIND,' 'nestled at the base of Diamond Head,' and references to hiking up to Diamond Head. While many remarks emphasize proximity rather than explicit 'views of Diamond Head,' one current MLS view field listed DIAHEA. Evidence is consistent across listings but often promotional/positional (agents may be emphasizing neighborhood), so confidence is moderate (0.75).
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention a community garden and that the property is 'directly across from a community garden' or lists a 'community garden' among building features; one remark also notes 'views overlooking lush greenery.' This consistent, explicit mention across several agent remarks and prior MLS GARDEN entries supports including garden view availability (confidence 0.88).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listings (0 of 9) mention 'SUNSET' in view_descriptions and several public remarks make no reference to sunset, evening sun, or western exposure. Past data noted high confidence (86%) but current remarks and view fields do not confirm sunset views, indicating the building does not advertise sunset views across listings and prior indications were likely erroneous or copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical MLS checkbox data is strong: 6 of 9 current listings include RESMAN (previously classified as High confidence). Current public remarks explicitly state 'on-site Resident Mgr' (quote: 'on-site Resident Mgr'), corroborating the MLS data. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents and supports that the building has a resident manager on-site.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.