Diamond Head Plaza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Diamond Head Plaza
Building Overview
Diamond Head Plaza in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis — built 1965, concrete construction; amenities include a pool and BBQ area.
About Diamond Head Plaza
Diamond Head Plaza is located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1965 and is constructed of concrete.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool and a BBQ area. No other amenity details are provided in the available records.
Additional details from MLS: parking is available, covered, and assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all information, including fees, rules, and current management, with official sources.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy data, including percentages and qualitative descriptions of the resident mix. The remarks provide no information about how many units are owner-occupied versus rented, so this cannot be determined from the listings.
I searched the remarks for any reference to elevators or lift access, but nothing was stated. The listings discuss floors, parking, pool, laundry, and unit location, yet never mention the building's elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Most recent MLS records for this building include OTCOEX, with 7 of 8 listings checked. The remarks do not spell it out, so this appears to be a consistent MLS field rather than a marketing description, but the frequency is strong enough to treat it as included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no MLS support for HOTWAT in any of the 8 listings, while a couple of records list WTRHTR, which usually points away from hot water being provided by the association. No remarks indicate hot water is included, so this is best treated as not included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All available MLS records for this building include SEWER in the association fee includes field. This is a very strong building-level pattern with 8 of 8 listings aligned, even though the remarks do not explicitly mention it.
Every MLS listing in the current set includes WATER in the association fee includes field. The evidence is unanimous across all 8 listings, making this a very reliable building feature even though the public remarks do not repeat it.
Multiple recent listings mark BBQ in the amenities (5/7), suggesting consistent agent reporting rather than an error. One listing’s remarks specifically mention a unit "overlooking the swimming pool and BBQ area," clearly indicating a common BBQ space for residents. No listings contradict this, so BBQ facilities are very likely present at the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building has a swimming pool with very strong support. At least 5 of the provided remark segments explicitly mention the pool, including "pool area," "refreshing pool," "a pool to unwind and relax," and "overlooking the swimming pool and BBQ area." This is consistent across multiple listings and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Shared laundry appears to be a building-level feature for this property and is confirmed in 3 current listings. The remarks use clear, consistent language about on-site/community laundry, which aligns with the existing MLS COMLAU data and suggests this is not a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple independent listings for Diamond Head Plaza describe unit-specific stalls, including 'one open parking stall', '1 covered parking stall', and 'Covered parking'. With 7/7 MLS records indicating some form of parking and no records showing 'NONE', the evidence strongly supports that the building provides parking for residents.
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'deeded covered parking' or a 'covered parking stall,' which is consistent with the prior MLS pattern showing assigned parking in 7/8 entries. The evidence looks building-level rather than a one-off agent note.
Covered parking is clearly present in the building based on both MLS checkbox data and remarks. At least several listings explicitly mention covered parking, including '1 covered parking stall' and 'deeded covered parking,' indicating this is not just copy-paste noise. A single listing with 'one open parking stall' does not outweigh the repeated covered-parking evidence.
The remarks directly confirm deeded parking, which is strong evidence that the stall is owned with the unit. Other listings also describe included covered parking, reinforcing that parking is assigned and attached to the unit.
No analysis available
I searched for any stated parking cost, rental fee, or monthly charge and found none. The listings say parking is included or deeded, but they do not mention an extra parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist or waiting list language and found none. The remarks consistently describe parking as included with the unit, which suggests a waitlist system is not part of the building's parking setup.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 7 current MLS listings flag CONCRE in the construction_materials, indicating agents consistently identify the building as concrete construction. No public remarks mention a different primary structure type, so the evidence points to concrete being a key construction component.
No analysis available
Hollow tile appears in 5 of 8 current MLS listings as HOLTIL. No public remarks explicitly confirm it, so this is based mainly on repeated MLS construction-material entries rather than narrative descriptions. The frequency is high enough to include, though it still looks somewhat agent-driven rather than independently verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 8 current MLS listings mark SLAB, and none of the public remarks explicitly describe a concrete slab or solid concrete foundation. This looks like weak, inconsistent MLS evidence rather than a well-confirmed building characteristic. Confidence is limited because the remarks do not corroborate it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, and minimum-stay language and found nothing. Since the remarks only discuss residential use and investment potential, STR is not confirmed and is treated as not allowed based on absence of evidence.
I looked for hotel pool, hotel rental program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool references, and similar language and found none. With no STR indication in the remarks, there is also no basis for a hotel pool program.
I searched for mandatory participation wording such as required rental pool, cannot opt out, or must be in the program and found nothing. The remarks do not indicate any owner obligation to join a rental pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for fee simple versus leasehold wording, ground lease references, and any expiration year such as 'expires 2050' or 'renewed through 2075.' Nothing in the remarks indicates land tenure or a lease expiry date.
I searched the remarks for VA-approved, VA financing, and VA loans accepted language and found nothing. Because there is no explicit evidence, this is treated as not confirmed from the public remarks.
The remarks directly advertise the building as fully insured, which strongly indicates HOA walls-in or comprehensive building insurance coverage. This is repeated clearly and requires no inference.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language such as fire life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection. The remarks do not include any building safety compliance information, so this remains unknown.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is moderate evidence that some units in the building have mountain views. The MLS data shows 'MOUNTA' on 3 of 8 listings, while the remarks mostly describe pool, Diamond Head, and neighborhood proximity without explicitly saying mountain view. This looks like partial building-level availability rather than a universal feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Seven recent listings for this building do not mention sunset views in either the MLS view fields or the remarks, and one listing explicitly reports no view. Multiple agents instead emphasize pool outlooks and general natural light, suggesting the building does not offer notable sunset-view units that would be marketable to buyers.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.