Diamond Head at Pualei Circle
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Diamond Head at Pualei Circle
Building Overview
Diamond Head at Pualei Circle in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis—1963 concrete building with pool and Diamond Head views.
About Diamond Head at Pualei Circle
Diamond Head at Pualei Circle is a residential building located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1963 and is of concrete construction. Specific unit sizes and total number of units are not provided in the MLS-derived data.
Key features listed in the MLS data include mountain and Diamond Head views as well as sunset views. On-site amenities noted are a pool and a BBQ area. The building policy information in the MLS indicates that short-term rentals are not allowed and that pets are permitted.
Additional details from the MLS show that parking is available and assigned. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, fees, and management information with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
12 of 14 current MLS listings list OTCOEX (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes, and historical data previously showed 11/13 (and earlier 10/12), indicating consistent building-level coverage. Public remarks do not explicitly say 'common area electricity' but the checkbox agreement across many agents is strong; while occasional copy/paste is possible, the weight of consistent MLS entries supports listing this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence across listings points to hot water NOT being included: 10 of 15 listings list WTRHTR (inclusions), while only 2 of 15 show HOTWAT in the association fee-includes. This pattern appears consistent across multiple agent listings and suggests the HOTWAT flags are likely copy/paste errors rather than a building-wide hot-water-included program.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that sewer is included in the HOA fees: 13 of 15 current listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes, matching prior high-confidence data. Multiple agent listings independently state sewer is included, indicating a building-wide practice rather than sporadic copy/paste.
Very strong evidence that water is included in the HOA fees: 14 of 15 current listings list WATER in association_fee_includes, aligned with prior high-confidence data. This is consistently reported across multiple listings and agents, indicating building-level inclusion of water in the maintenance fee.
Historic MLS data indicates 12 of 15 listings listed BBQ amenities and current remarks confirm the feature across the community: at least seven separate listing remarks explicitly reference BBQ or barbecue areas (quotes: "swimming pool & barbecue area", "access to two pools, barbecue areas", "BBQ grill stations", "2 BBQ grills"). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent listings and aligns with prior high confidence, so the building offers shared BBQ/grilling facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings for this building explicitly describe outdoor living areas, including covered lanais, screened-in lanais, and a large entertaining patio with substantial square footage. About half of the remarks mention features like “88 sf covered lanai,” “3 separate lanais,” and “605 sq ft outdoor area” with patio space, confirming that at least some units offer patio/deck-style outdoor amenities. Combined with 8/13 MLS entries checking PATDEC/COVPAT, this strongly supports that the building offers patio/deck (lanai) features.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings in this building describe dedicated extra storage beyond normal closets, including a 'Large storage/laundry room,' an 'Extra storage closet on back lanai,' and a 'covered, lockable storage, perfect for surfboards, bikes, and more.' In addition, 2 of 12 listings mark STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG in building amenities and 1 marks STORAG in unit features, aligning with the detailed remarks rather than generic marketing language. This indicates that at least some units in the building offer additional storage spaces attractive to buyers needing extra storage capacity.
Public remarks explicitly describe dedicated or suitable storage for surfboards in several unit descriptions. This provides strong evidence that surfboard storage exists in the property.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Building-level pools are consistently documented: the MLS amenity checkbox is set on all 15 listings and at least a dozen public remarks explicitly reference pool access. Representative quotes include "two sparkling swimming pools," "access to two pools," and "the clam-shaped fountain that cascades into the pool," indicating shared, building-level pool amenities across multiple agents rather than isolated or unit-specific notes.
No analysis available
Multiple listings reference pools (clam-shaped, two pools, etc.), but there is no indication any pool is a salt-water pool. Absence of evidence leads to a low-confidence false.
Multiple current public remarks across listings explicitly state in-unit laundry—examples include "in unit Washer and Dryer", "full-size W/D in the unit", and "rare in-unit laundry room". At least 5 separate listings mention in-unit washer/dryer and MLS inclusions show WASHER/DRYER checked in 7 of 15 listings, so the building does offer units with in-unit laundry.
Community/shared laundry is strongly supported: MLS amenities show COMLAU on nearly all listings (13/14) and public remarks state residents have access to "three community laundry facilities" and shared amenities across sister properties. Multiple agents reference shared amenities rather than a single isolated remark, so community laundry is a confirmed building feature.
Remarks reference community laundry facilities but contain no language indicating they require payment. Absence of payment-related terms leads to a medium-confidence false.
Listings mention three community laundry facilities shared across the properties. There is explicit wording indicating a set number of facilities, so there is no support for 'laundry on every floor.'
Parking is clearly available in this complex: current MLS checkboxes show parking on all 14 listings and multiple public remarks explicitly reference parking (e.g., "1 parking located on the desirable Pualie Circle", "one assigned end parking space", "assigned parking stall is right in front of the building", "parking access from Kana`ina Avenue"). Evidence is consistent across many agents/remarks and aligns with high-confidence historical MLS data, so parking is included for the building.
Assigned parking is a building standard: the MLS shows 13 of 15 listings with parking marked ASSIGN, and at least seven public remarks in the current dataset explicitly reference assigned stalls (quotes include "one assigned end parking space" and "assigned parking stall"). The consistency across multiple listings and the strong MLS checkbox prevalence indicate a high-confidence building-level feature rather than isolated copy/paste errors.
No analysis available
I searched for wording such as 'deeded parking' or 'owned stall' but found only 'assigned' parking references across listings, which indicates parking is allocated but not described as deeded. Set to false with moderate-high confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or 'parking rent' but found none. Because there is no information about a parking fee in the public remarks, the value is unknown (null) with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'waitlist', 'waiting list', and similar terms and found no references. Given the lack of any waitlist language and the presence of assigned stalls, set to false with low-to-medium confidence.
No analysis available
Public remarks detail many amenities but do not reference card or fob access systems. With no mention, the field is set false at medium confidence.
No analysis available
Listings do not reference a security patrol or roving security service. In the absence of remarks confirming such service, the value is false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS inclusions indicate ACSPL on 6 of 14 listings, and at least 4 separate public remarks explicitly state split/mini-split A/C (quotes include 'Split AC in both bedrooms' and 'split a/c units in both the bedroom and living area'). Although a few listings note window AC instead, the combined checkbox data and multiple explicit remarks from different listings provide strong evidence that some units in the building have split AC systems.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence: 13 of 15 current MLS listings list CONCRE as a construction material and prior data indicated high confidence that the building is concrete. Public remarks do not explicitly describe the building as 'concrete' (only one unit mentions 'polished concrete floors' referring to interior flooring), so the MLS field consensus is the primary evidence and is consistent across multiple listings/agents.
Weak evidence: a small number of listings (around 3–4 of ~14) list double-wall (DOUWAL) in the MLS construction_materials field, but none of the public remarks reference 'double wall' or similar. Given the sparse checkbox usage and lack of corroborating remarks, confidence is low-to-moderate that the building has double-wall construction.
Across the available MLS data, 7 of 13 current listings (and 6 of 12 previously) mark hollow tile (HOLTIL) as a construction material, indicating it is likely part of the building’s structure. Although none of the public remarks explicitly mention 'hollow tile construction,' the repeated checkbox use by multiple agents over time points to a real characteristic rather than copy‑paste noise. Given this consistent pattern and no evidence of a change away from hollow tile, the building is treated as having hollow tile construction.
Moderate evidence: approximately 6–7 of ~14 current listings have MASSTU checked in construction_materials. However, none of the public remarks explicitly state 'masonry' or 'stucco', so the indication comes mostly from MLS checkboxes rather than agent remarks. Because of the mixed signal and possible copy/paste, confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
A minority of current listings (2 of 12) explicitly mark SLAB in the construction_materials field, and no remarks point to any different type of foundation. While the evidence is not as strong or as consistent as for concrete construction, the combination of MLS selections and the typical construction style for similar buildings makes a slab foundation more likely than not. Because foundations are building-wide characteristics, even a few consistent SLAB entries carry meaningful weight.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Insufficient/remnant checkbox evidence: 6 of 15 current MLS listings list ABOGRO but there are no public remarks describing the building as 'above ground construction' (remarks reference ground-level units and typical unit features). Given the lack of confirming remarks and inconsistent checkbox usage across agents, this appears to be an agent-checked field rather than a documented building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for STR-related terms and found no explicit allowance or reference to short-term rentals. Therefore STR is set to false with low-to-medium confidence based solely on absence of evidence in the public remarks.
Listings describe the pools as community or residential amenities and do not reference any hotel rental pool program. Because STR is not indicated and no hotel pool language exists, this is false with moderate confidence.
There is no evidence that participation in any rental pool is required. Multiple listings describe shared community pools and amenities and make no mention of mandatory rental-program participation, so this is false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings explicitly describe the property as fee simple, so a leasehold expiry year is not applicable. Returned null for lease expiry and high confidence because 'fee simple' is stated directly.
I searched the public remarks for terms like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and 'VA loans'. There is no explicit statement that the building is VA loan approved, so set to false with low-to-medium confidence due to absence of evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
At least 6 listings explicitly reference ocean or Pacific Ocean views (phrases include "peek of the ocean", "Pacific ocean", and "Friday fireworks over the ocean"). Evidence is present across multiple agent remarks and unit descriptions, indicating some units/building positions offer ocean views even though MLS view_descriptions summary showed 0/15 for OCEAN.
Approximately 9 listings mention mountain or Diamond Head/mauka views (phrases include "at the base of Diamond Head", "mountain views", and multiple references to Diamond Head). Strong, consistent confirmation across listings and historical high confidence support inclusion.
Roughly 9 listings explicitly reference Diamond Head (quotes include "iconic Diamond Head views" and "base of Diamond Head"). Multiple agents' remarks consistently mention Diamond Head views, giving strong building-level evidence that Diamond Head views are available.
About 4 listings mention city or Waikiki skyline views (phrases include "Waikiki skyline views" and "slight views of Waikiki"). Multiple independent listings reference urban/Waikiki vistas, indicating city views are available in some units.
Zero listings explicitly mention "coastline" or "shoreline" views, while many other view types (ocean, Diamond Head, garden, sunset) are explicitly cited. Given the lack of coastline-specific language across the remarks, coastline view is not supported by the current descriptions.
Approximately 6 listings reference garden or community garden views (phrases include "garden-view retreat", "community garden", and "lush landscaping"). Repeated mentions across listings show the building offers garden views for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Around 4 listings explicitly reference sunset or evening views (quotes include "stunning sunset and ocean views" and "sunset walks"). Consistent agent remarks across units indicate sunset views are available from some positions in the building.
No analysis available
Multiple listings reference Friday night/weekly fireworks in conjunction with private lanais and views, implying residents can watch fireworks from the unit/lanai or building. Wording is not an absolute technical guarantee but provides reasonable evidence of a view from the property.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 12 current MLS listings for the Diamond Head at Pualei / Leilani / Diamond Head Manor complexes, 5 have the resident-manager (RESMAN) amenity checked, indicating some consistent belief among agents that the building has an on-site manager. None of the narrative remarks explicitly reference a resident or on-site manager, which weakens the evidence somewhat. In the absence of contradictory information or user verification, this points to a moderately supported likelihood that a resident manager is present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.