Diamond Head Apts Ltd
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Diamond Head Apts Ltd
Building Overview
Diamond Head Apts Ltd in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis with pool and ocean/Diamond Head views.
About Diamond Head Apts Ltd
Based on MLS data, Diamond Head Apts Ltd is located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood and was built in 1957. The building is constructed of concrete and has two elevators. Size and unit count are not provided in the available MLS data.
According to available records, the building offers ocean, mountain, Diamond Head and sunset views. On-site amenities listed in the MLS include a pool, BBQ area, a resident manager and a security guard.
The MLS notes covered, assigned parking is available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Buyers should verify all details, fees and policies with the listing agent or building management, as this summary is based solely on MLS-derived data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy figures and qualitative clues such as '80% owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied,' but found none. Because the remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy data, the percentage remains unknown from this source.
The public remarks directly confirm that the building has two elevators, which matches the current context. This is repeated in more than one listing, so confidence is very high.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable is strongly supported by the MLS and remarks. Historical data says 17/19 listings include CABTV, and the public remarks explicitly state the maintenance fee 'includes cable/internet.' This looks consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent error.
Strong evidence supports common-area electricity being included. One listing explicitly states MF includes "base electricity" and "common area expenses," and the MLS checkbox appears in 12/20 current listings. The remarks read like building-level boilerplate rather than a one-off, so this looks legitimately supported.
No analysis available
At least one recent remark clearly notes that the maintenance fee includes 'base electricity (AC separately metered/billed),' and several MLS entries (5/17) also check the electricity-included box. This aligns with prior high-confidence conclusions that unit electricity is included in the MF, with no contrary statements in current remarks.
No analysis available
Hot water is only moderately supported. The strongest evidence is MLS data with HOTWAT checked in 12/20 listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly say "hot water included." The presence of WTRHTR in some listings introduces ambiguity, so this is not as solid as the water/sewer fields.
Internet is strongly supported. The clearest evidence is the maintenance-fee remark stating it 'includes cable/internet,' and MLS data also shows 14/19 listings with INTSER. This is a high-confidence building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is extremely well supported. Every current MLS listing marks SEWER, and at least one remark explicitly lists "water, sewer" in the maintenance fee. This is consistent across the data and does not look like a copy-paste anomaly.
Water inclusion is extremely well supported. Every current MLS listing marks WATER, and the public remarks explicitly confirm "water" is included in the MF. This is consistent across multiple listings and agents, making it highly reliable.
BBQ is clearly a building amenity here. Across the supplied remarks, multiple listings explicitly reference BBQ or grilling features in different forms, and the MLS data is highly consistent at 15/20. This looks like a real shared amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I am correcting car wash to false because the current remarks do not mention it at all, even while they do mention many other parking/amenity details. The MLS checkbox signal is weak at only 5/20, and there is no corroborating description from agents to support that the building actually has a car wash facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building offers patio/deck-style outdoor space. Across many listings, agents mention lanais, outdoor lounging areas, and common open-air gathering spaces such as a 'covered common area open air lanai' and 'oceanfront lanai,' which is consistent across multiple remarks rather than a one-off copy-paste detail.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building appears to offer a genuine recreation/common gathering area. Multiple remarks point to shared leisure spaces—especially the lounge, gathering area, lawn area, and amenity deck-style descriptions—and the MLS historical data is consistently high at 15/20. This is well supported across several listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported for this building. Across the provided remarks, multiple listings mention it directly, including "external storage units" and units that "come with one covered parking and storage." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the historical MLS pattern, so this feature should be retained.
I searched for surfboard storage-related amenities and found none. The remarks talk about surfing nearby and direct ocean access, but do not describe any dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute appears likely but not explicitly documented in the remarks. The MLS data shows a moderate 9/20 presence, which suggests some agents consistently saw it as a building feature, but the current descriptions focus on other amenities and do not directly confirm it. Confidence is therefore moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed. At least 10+ current remarks mention it, including phrases like "oceanfront swimming pool," "saltwater pool," "heated pool overlooking the ocean," and "private pool." The repeated mentions across multiple listings and agents make this a highly reliable building feature.
Heated pool is confirmed by multiple listings. At least 5 current remarks explicitly say "heated pool" or "heated saltwater swimming pool," and one describes a "heated oceanfront pool." The consistency across different listings supports this as a real building amenity rather than copied checkbox data.
The pool type is directly identified in the remarks as saltwater. Several listings repeat this language, including heated saltwater pool references, which is strong evidence.
Laundry in unit is strongly supported across the listing set. Current MLS data shows washer/dryer in 18 of 20 listings, and at least one remark explicitly states the unit "includes a Washer and Dryer," confirming this is a real building/unit feature rather than a checkbox artifact. Evidence is consistent with copy-paste MLS data, but the repeated inclusions plus explicit remarks make the feature highly reliable.
Community/shared laundry is supported by both MLS amenities and public remarks. One listing explicitly mentions "laundry on the premises," and current MLS data shows COMLAU in 7 of 20 listings, indicating a building-level laundry room or similar shared facility. This is not as universally documented as in-unit laundry, but the wording is clear enough to confirm the amenity.
I looked for paid-laundry language such as coin laundry, coin-op, quarters, card access, or laundry fee mentions. Nothing in the remarks confirms paid community laundry, so this remains unverified.
I searched for wording like laundry on every floor, laundry room on each floor, and floor-by-floor laundry. The public remarks only reference general laundry availability on the premises and in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence for this feature.
Parking is clearly present across the listings, with many remarks explicitly referencing it. Examples include '2 covered parking stalls,' 'dedicated parking,' '1 parking,' 'assigned parking,' and 'secured covered parking.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the MLS checkbox data.
Multiple listings support assigned parking, with explicit mentions of "dedicated parking," "assigned parking," "2 covered parking stalls," and units described with a specific number of stalls. The evidence is strong across several remarks and aligns with the historical MLS confidence, so this feature should be included.
Covered parking is strongly supported by the remarks. Several listings explicitly say "covered parking," "2 covered parking stalls," "one covered parking," and "secured covered parking," indicating this is a building-level offering available to buyers. The consistency across multiple agents makes this very strong evidence.
I looked for phrases like deeded parking, owned parking, parking included in deed, or owned stall. The remarks repeatedly mention parking stalls and covered parking, but do not say the parking is deeded or owned with the unit.
No analysis available
I searched for references to parking fees, monthly parking charges, or parking rental costs and found nothing. The listings describe parking as included or assigned, but do not mention any separate parking cost.
Across numerous listings that carefully list amenities such as assigned/dedicated parking, EV charging, pool, BBQ, and ocean access, none mention any guest or visitor parking. With only 2/17 MLS checkbox entries indicating guest parking and no remark support, the evidence suggests the building does not provide dedicated guest parking stalls. Given the constrained Gold Coast context and consistent omission, it's very likely guest parking is not a true building feature.
Secured-entry parking is supported by multiple explicit remarks, including "secured parking," "secure building," and "secured covered parking." The evidence appears in several separate listings and is reinforced by the historical MLS secured-entry data, so this feature should be retained.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for terms like parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a list for parking and found no evidence. The remarks instead describe available parking stalls without any indication of a waitlist process.
No analysis available
I searched for card/fob access terms and did not find any. The remarks mention security generally, but that is not enough to confirm a card-based access system.
Security guard/service is strongly supported by the listing history and current remarks. At least 3 current listings explicitly mention security or secure building language, including phrases like "24 hour security" and "24-hour security and on-site manager," which is consistent with the prior MLS amenity flag. The evidence appears to be repeated across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
I looked for explicit references to patrol or roving security service. The listings mention 24-hour security, an on-site manager, and a secure building, but nothing indicates a patrol service.
No analysis available
Evidence that some units have central air: MLS checkboxes show central AC on several listings (5/18 unit_features, 6/18 inclusions), and multiple public remarks explicitly state 'Unit has Central A/C' or reference central AC/AC separately metered. Other remarks emphasize trade winds and split systems, so central AC appears available in some units rather than universally throughout the building.
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly describe window AC/window units, while several mention central A/C, split AC systems, or simply natural ventilation from trade winds. With only 1 of 20 current MLS records showing ACWIUN and no corroborating remarks, the evidence strongly suggests this building does not offer window air conditioning as a building feature.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data: 20 out of 20 current listings identify the building as CONCRE. None of the public remarks contradict this, and the building’s mid-century oceanfront profile is consistent with concrete construction. Evidence appears to be consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several MLS entries explicitly tag the building with the 'Above Ground' construction code (ABOGRO), and unit descriptions reference high-floor and penthouse units in a mid-rise Gold Coast structure. There is no mention of any basement or partially below-grade residential construction, so above-ground construction is reasonably supported despite inconsistent checkbox usage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental allowed, legal STR, NUC, TVU, or similar language and found none. The remarks also do not suggest any exception that would indicate short-term rentals are permitted.
I looked for hotel rental pool, hotel-managed program, or brand-specific pool references and found none. Because the remarks do not establish short-term rentals as allowed, hotel pool participation is not supported.
I searched for language indicating required participation, cannot opt out, or must be in a rental program and found nothing. With no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, a mandatory hotel pool is also unsupported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for ground lease language such as lease expiry, leasehold expiration, or renewal dates, but found none. The clearest relevant wording is "Fee Simple Building," which indicates there is no leasehold expiry year applicable.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found none. The listings discuss amenities, views, and parking, but do not indicate VA loan eligibility.
I reviewed the remarks for insurance-related wording that would indicate full HOA or walls-in coverage, but there were no such references. Since the listings do not address insurance coverage directly, this feature cannot be confirmed from the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit fire/life safety compliance language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, and found nothing. With no public evidence, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not established from the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are consistently confirmed across the remarks, with many listings saying "breathtaking ocean views," "Pacific Ocean," "oceanfront," and "direct access to the pacific ocean." Multiple agents independently describe ocean views from multiple rooms, lanais, and panoramic vistas, so this appears to be a stable building-level feature.
Mountain views are repeatedly supported, including phrases like "ocean to mountain," "majestic Mountain views," "distant mountains," and "mountains" in panoramic view descriptions. The evidence appears across several listings and agents, not just a single copied remark.
Diamond Head views are clearly confirmed in multiple remarks, including "at the base of Diamond Head," "iconic Diamond Head crater," "Unobstructed Diamond Head View," and "Diamond Head and Waikiki's coastline." The repeated references across listings indicate this is a genuine and marketable building view feature.
City views are supported by remarks such as "city lights," "city day & nightlight views," and "city" in panoramic view descriptions. While less universal than ocean views, the feature appears clearly present in the building.
At least three distinct listings call out coastline perspectives, using phrases like 'sweeping Ocean vistas stretching across Waikiki's coastline', 'breathtaking panoramic Pacific Ocean views stretching across Diamond Head and Waikiki's coastline', and 'ocean, coastline, sunset, city, Kapiolani Park and Diamond Head views'. This confirms that some units feature broader coastline views, not just straight-on water views.
Garden/greenery views are mentioned in several remarks through phrases like "tranquil garden" and "lush views" / "greenery views of Kapiolani Park." This is not as common as ocean or Diamond Head, but there is enough repeated evidence to include it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings or remarks mention sunrise or eastern exposure (0 of 18 MLS view_descriptions list sunrise), and public remarks focus on ocean, Diamond Head, sunsets and park/garden views. Therefore the building is not advertised as offering sunrise views.
Sunset views are heavily supported, with listings describing "spectacular sunsets every evening," "front row seats to spectacular sunsets," "watching the sunsets from the pool area," and oceanfront lanai sunset views. This appears consistently across multiple remarks and is unlikely to be a single agent copy-paste error.
No analysis available
The listings directly confirm fireworks views from units, not just proximity to fireworks. The wording specifically says residents can see Hilton's evening fireworks display from the unit/building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence supports a resident manager on-site at the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention "on-site resident manager," "on site manager," and "Resident Manager," matching the historical MLS pattern of 17/20 listings checked for RESMAN. This is consistent across multiple remarks and appears to be a real building feature.
No analysis available
This is very strong evidence the building is a cooperative. The MLS association fee data shows COOTAX in all 20/20 listings, and several remarks explicitly mention 'coop board approval' and 'co-op property taxes,' confirming the structure across multiple agents and listings.
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.