Diamond Head Apts Ltd
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Diamond Head Apts Ltd
Building Overview
Diamond Head Apts Ltd in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis with pool and ocean/Diamond Head views.
About Diamond Head Apts Ltd
Based on MLS data, Diamond Head Apts Ltd is located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood and was built in 1957. The building is constructed of concrete and has two elevators. Size and unit count are not provided in the available MLS data.
According to available records, the building offers ocean, mountain, Diamond Head and sunset views. On-site amenities listed in the MLS include a pool, BBQ area, a resident manager and a security guard.
The MLS notes covered, assigned parking is available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Buyers should verify all details, fees and policies with the listing agent or building management, as this summary is based solely on MLS-derived data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for owner-occupancy percentages or descriptive phrases such as 80% owner occupied or highly owner occupied, but found none. Because this is a numeric field and there is no supporting evidence, the value remains unknown.
Multiple remarks confirm the building has two elevators, matching the current building context. This is explicit and high-confidence evidence, so the value remains 2.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable is strongly supported by the MLS and remarks. Historical data says 17/19 listings include CABTV, and the public remarks explicitly state the maintenance fee 'includes cable/internet.' This looks consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent error.
There is moderate evidence that common-area electricity/operating costs are included. The strongest public note is the MF remark listing 'common area expenses' and 'base electricity,' while 11/19 MLS entries mark OTCOEX. This is supportive, though the wording is slightly broader than a direct 'common electric' statement.
No analysis available
At least one recent remark clearly notes that the maintenance fee includes 'base electricity (AC separately metered/billed),' and several MLS entries (5/17) also check the electricity-included box. This aligns with prior high-confidence conclusions that unit electricity is included in the MF, with no contrary statements in current remarks.
No analysis available
Hot water appears to be included based mainly on MLS checkbox data, with 12/19 current listings marking HOTWAT. The public remarks do not directly confirm this, so confidence is only moderate and there is no clear contradiction such as a WTRHTR mention.
Internet is strongly supported. The clearest evidence is the maintenance-fee remark stating it 'includes cable/internet,' and MLS data also shows 14/19 listings with INTSER. This is a high-confidence building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
Sewer is one of the strongest features in the dataset. All 19 current MLS listings mark SEWER, and the public remark explicitly lists 'water, sewer' among the included maintenance-fee items. Evidence is consistent and very strong.
Water is strongly and consistently supported. Every current MLS listing shown includes WATER, and the public remarks explicitly state the MF includes 'water.' This appears to be a stable building-level inclusion.
The BBQ feature is strongly supported across many listings and multiple agents. Current remarks mention it in several forms: "BBQ lounge area," "community grilling station," "covered BBQ area," and a "gathering area with a grill," confirming shared grilling amenities at the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the numerous detailed remarks mention a car wash, even when listing other parking-related amenities such as EV charging and porte cochere. With only 4 of 16 MLS entries checking car wash and no textual support, it is very likely the building does not offer a car wash facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building offers patio/deck-style outdoor space. At least 6+ listings mention lanais or outdoor living areas, with phrases like 'private lanai,' 'wraparound lanai,' 'oceanfront lanai,' and 'surf level lanai.' The evidence is repeated across multiple remarks, not just a single copied description.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation-area amenities are consistently referenced in the building remarks and align with the historical MLS data. Multiple listings mention shared common spaces like "lounge area," "grand gathering spaces," "lawn area," and outdoor gathering/recreation settings, indicating a building-level recreation area rather than a unit-specific feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported for this building. Across the provided remarks, multiple listings mention it explicitly, including "external storage units," "storage," and a unit that "comes with one covered parking and storage." This aligns with the historical MLS checkboxes, suggesting the amenity is real and consistently represented rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
I searched for surfboard storage-related terms, including surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and bike and surfboard storage. The remarks only mention general storage and do not provide evidence of dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
About half of the MLS listings explicitly check the trash chute amenity, and the building is a multi-story 1950s Honolulu co-op where trash chutes are typical. Even though remarks don’t call it out by name, the MLS data and building type strongly suggest a shared trash chute system exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool feature is confirmed across many listings and multiple agents, with at least 10+ remarks explicitly mentioning it. Phrases include 'oceanfront swimming pool,' 'heated pool,' 'saltwater pool,' and 'heated saltwater swimming pool,' indicating this is a shared building amenity rather than a unit-level feature. The current MLS amenity data is also uniformly checked, so confidence is very high.
At least 5 listings explicitly describe a heated pool, using phrases like 'heated pool overlooking the ocean', 'heated saltwater swimming pool', and 'heated saltwater pool on property'. The consistency and specificity of 'heated' language across several independently written remarks provide strong evidence that the building’s pool is heated.
The pool type is directly stated in several listings, including heated saltwater pool language. This is strong, repeated evidence that the building pool is salt water.
Laundry in unit is strongly supported: 17 of 19 recent listings list washer/dryer in the inclusions, and at least one public remark explicitly says "The unit includes a Washer and Dryer." A separate remark mentions "laundry on the premises," which appears to refer to building laundry as well, but the in-unit evidence is clear and consistent. This looks like real building/MLS data rather than a one-off agent copy-paste issue.
At least one agent’s remarks specify 'laundry on the premises,' indicating a shared laundry facility in the building. Additionally, 6 of 16 listings mark community laundry in the amenities, reinforcing that a common laundry option exists even if not every agent checked the box. Buyers seeking shared laundry access would find it in this building.
I looked for terms such as coin laundry, paid laundry, coin-op, quarters, card operated, and laundry fee. The remarks never state that community laundry requires payment, so this cannot be confirmed from the public text.
I searched for phrases like laundry on each floor, laundry room on every floor, and floor-by-floor laundry. The public remarks only indicate a community laundry on the premises, which does not support every-floor laundry. No listing explicitly says there is a laundry room on each floor.
Parking is clearly present across the listings, with many remarks explicitly referencing it. Examples include '2 covered parking stalls,' 'dedicated parking,' '1 parking,' 'assigned parking,' and 'secured covered parking.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the MLS checkbox data.
Multiple listings explicitly mention 'dedicated parking' and 'assigned parking', and several units are described with a specific stall count (e.g., 1 or 2 stalls). Combined with 12/16 MLS entries checking ASSIGN, this strongly indicates that parking stalls are reserved/assigned in this building.
Covered parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and public remarks. At least several listings explicitly say 'covered parking' or 'covered parking and storage,' and one notes '2 covered parking stalls.' This appears to be consistent building-level information rather than a copy-paste error.
I searched for explicit deed language such as deeded parking, owned parking, or parking included in deed, but did not find it. The listings repeatedly mention covered, assigned, or secure parking, which suggests parking is available but not clearly deeded from the remarks alone.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of a parking fee, monthly parking charge, or parking rental and found nothing. The remarks identify covered, secured, and assigned parking stalls, but do not state whether there is an added monthly cost.
Across numerous listings that carefully list amenities such as assigned/dedicated parking, EV charging, pool, BBQ, and ocean access, none mention any guest or visitor parking. With only 2/17 MLS checkbox entries indicating guest parking and no remark support, the evidence suggests the building does not provide dedicated guest parking stalls. Given the constrained Gold Coast context and consistent omission, it's very likely guest parking is not a true building feature.
Secured parking is supported by multiple explicit remarks and the MLS secured-entry checkbox data. The wording 'Secured parking has outlet ready for an EV' and 'secure, oversized underground parking stall' strongly indicates gated/secured access. Evidence is good across multiple listings, though not as ubiquitous as general parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like parking waitlist, waiting list, or join the list for parking and found none. The remarks instead describe parking as assigned, dedicated, covered, or secure.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for card/fob-based access terms such as key card, fob, card reader, and keycard entry. The listings mention security generally, but not a card-access system, so this feature is not supported by the text.
Multiple listings explicitly describe the building as having "24 hour security" and an on-site manager, indicating continuous security presence. About 7 of 16 MLS entries also check the security/guard amenity, and other remarks reference a secure building and secured access, reinforcing that this is a real, building-wide service rather than an agent error.
I looked for security patrol, roving security, patrol service, and patrolled building language. The remarks support that the building is secured, but there is no explicit evidence of patrols, so this remains unconfirmed.
No analysis available
Evidence that some units have central air: MLS checkboxes show central AC on several listings (5/18 unit_features, 6/18 inclusions), and multiple public remarks explicitly state 'Unit has Central A/C' or reference central AC/AC separately metered. Other remarks emphasize trade winds and split systems, so central AC appears available in some units rather than universally throughout the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The concrete construction feature is strongly supported by the MLS data: 19 out of 19 current listings mark the building as concrete. The public remarks do not explicitly say “concrete,” but they consistently describe the property as a solid, established Ossipoff-designed building, with no evidence suggesting a change in construction material. This appears to be stable building-level data rather than agent copy-paste uncertainty.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several MLS entries explicitly tag the building with the 'Above Ground' construction code (ABOGRO), and unit descriptions reference high-floor and penthouse units in a mid-rise Gold Coast structure. There is no mention of any basement or partially below-grade residential construction, so above-ground construction is reasonably supported despite inconsistent checkbox usage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental allowed, legal STR, NUC, or TVU and found no explicit support. Nothing in the public remarks suggests short-term rentals are permitted, so this remains false based on available text.
I searched for hotel rental pool, hotel program, managed by hotel, or brand-specific pool references and found none. Since the remarks do not establish STR eligibility, hotel pool participation cannot be true here.
I looked for mandatory rental pool language such as required participation, must be in the program, or cannot opt out, and found nothing. With no evidence of STR or a hotel pool, a mandatory pool is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly describe the property as a fee simple building, which means there is no ground lease expiry year to extract. I also looked for phrases like lease expires, ground lease ends, or renewed through a specific year and found none.
I looked for explicit VA language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found none. The remarks discuss parking, pool, security, and fee simple status, but do not mention VA eligibility.
I reviewed the remarks for insurance-related wording such as fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance, and found no explicit statement. With no public evidence, this is treated as unconfirmed and set to false with low confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like FLSE, fire life safety evaluation passed, fire safety certified, and passed fire inspection, but found nothing. Since there is no public remark evidence, this remains unconfirmed and is set to false with low confidence per the rules.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are consistently confirmed across the remarks: multiple listings say "oceanfront," "breathtaking unobstructed ocean views," "Pacific Ocean views," and "ocean vistas." Current remarks strongly reinforce the MLS history, with ocean mentioned in well over half the examples and often as a core building feature.
Mountain views are explicitly mentioned in several remarks, including "mountains," "majestic Mountain views," and "ocean to mountain." The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent description.
Diamond Head views are repeatedly confirmed with phrases like "iconic Diamond Head crater," "Diamond Head view," and "Diamond Head views." Multiple listings from different remarks describe the building/unit as facing or overlooking Diamond Head, making this a high-confidence feature.
City views are supported by remarks such as "city lights," "city day & nightlight views," and "city" in panoramic view descriptions. While less universal than ocean views, the feature appears clearly present in the building.
At least three distinct listings call out coastline perspectives, using phrases like 'sweeping Ocean vistas stretching across Waikiki's coastline', 'breathtaking panoramic Pacific Ocean views stretching across Diamond Head and Waikiki's coastline', and 'ocean, coastline, sunset, city, Kapiolani Park and Diamond Head views'. This confirms that some units feature broader coastline views, not just straight-on water views.
Garden/greenery views are mentioned in several remarks through phrases like "tranquil garden" and "lush views" / "greenery views of Kapiolani Park." This is not as common as ocean or Diamond Head, but there is enough repeated evidence to include it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings or remarks mention sunrise or eastern exposure (0 of 18 MLS view_descriptions list sunrise), and public remarks focus on ocean, Diamond Head, sunsets and park/garden views. Therefore the building is not advertised as offering sunrise views.
Sunset views are heavily supported by remarks such as "spectacular sunsets every evening," "front row seats to spectacular sunsets," and "watching the sunsets from the pool area." Multiple listings independently highlight sunset exposure, so this feature is very well established.
No analysis available
The listings clearly describe units with views of Hilton's evening fireworks from the building. This is direct evidence of fireworks views, not merely proximity to fireworks. Multiple remarks also emphasize high-floor or penthouse outlooks supporting that claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence supports an on-site resident manager at the building. Multiple current remarks explicitly mention "on-site resident manager," "on-site manager," and "Resident Manager," and this aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS pattern (16/19 listings flagged RESMAN). The consistency across numerous listings suggests this is a stable building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Overwhelming evidence the building is a co-op. Multiple listings explicitly say 'Sale is subject to coop board approval,' and one remark lists 'co-op property taxes' among the fees. The current data aligns with the historical 19/19 COOTAX pattern, making this a very high-confidence cooperative building.
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.