Diamond Head Ambassador A
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Diamond Head Ambassador A
Building Overview
Diamond Head Ambassador A in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis — concrete building (1959) with ocean views, pool and resident manager.
About Diamond Head Ambassador A
Diamond Head Ambassador A is located in the Diamond Head‑Kapahulu‑St. Louis neighborhood. According to available records the building was built in 1959 and is of concrete construction. Specific unit count and square footage were not provided in the MLS data.
Key features reported in MLS data include ocean views, an on‑site pool, and a resident manager. The listing data also states that pets and short‑term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Additional details such as parking availability, maintenance fees, special assessments, and other building services were not included in the MLS extract. Based on MLS data, prospective buyers should verify parking, fees, rules, and any other items of interest with the listing agent or building management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Confidence 88%: There is no prior confidence data, and only 1 of 2 current MLS listings has CABTV checked in association_fee_includes while the other does not, and neither set of remarks mentions cable being included in the maintenance fee. Given the inconsistent checkbox use and lack of textual confirmation, this looks like agent variability rather than a reliable building-level inclusion.
OTCOEX appears in 4 of 9 current MLS listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'common area electricity' or similar. This is likely copy-paste across some listings; inclusion is possible but not clearly confirmed in agent remarks.
No analysis available
Electricity is strongly supported: 9/9 MLS listings include ELECTR and one listing explicitly says 'Monthly dues ($790) INCLUDE ... ELECTRICITY.' Multiple agents consistently checked the box, and at least one remark directly confirms it.
No analysis available
HOTWAT is present in 7/9 MLS records, and remarks reference building-wide plumbing upgrades and paid assessments, but none explicitly say 'hot water included.' The evidence is primarily from MLS checkboxes (implied) rather than clear agent remarks.
Confidence 88%: With no prior confidence data, only 1 of 2 current listings showing INTSER in association_fee_includes, and no remarks describing internet as being part of the maintenance fee, the evidence is too thin to treat this as a real building feature. The pattern matches common MLS checkbox noise.
No analysis available
SEWER appears in 9/9 MLS listings; remarks note 'plumbing fully replaced' and paid assessments which supports building-level plumbing coverage, though no remark explicitly states 'sewer included'—evidence is consistent across MLS entries.
WATER is checked in 9/9 MLS listings. While public remarks discuss plumbing replacement and assessments paid, none explicitly say 'water included'; the MLS checkbox consistency provides moderate-to-strong implied evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks across the provided listings mention a meeting room, conference room, board room, hospitality room, or community room (0 of 8 remarks). Although CURRENT MLS metadata indicates 5/8 listings checked MEEROO, there is no corroborating language in agent remarks and no user verification; this suggests checkbox errors rather than an actual building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1/9 listings have the RECARE checkbox in MLS, and 0 of 9 public remarks explicitly mention a recreation area (search terms like 'recreation area', 'rec area', 'recreation deck', or 'amenity deck' not found). Remarks emphasize oceanfront pool and lawn but do not describe a separate shared 'recreation area', suggesting the single MLS check is likely copy/paste rather than a true building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Building-level storage is well supported: MLS amenities show storage on 9 of 9 current listings and several public remarks explicitly state "Large onsite storage unit included," "Basement storage unit is assigned to the apartment," and "bike and surfboard storage available." Multiple agents mention storage across different listings, indicating consistent, confirmed availability rather than an isolated copy/paste error.
Public remarks explicitly mention surfboard storage availability and surfboard rentals through the manager, indicating on-site surfboard storage and related services with high confidence.
No analysis available
MLS checkboxes indicate TRACHU in 5/9 listings, but 0 of 9 public remarks reference a trash/garbage/refuse chute. With low historical confidence and no supporting remarks from multiple listings/agents, the evidence points to inconsistent checkbox usage rather than a confirmed building trash-chute system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a pool: all 9 current MLS listings include POOL in amenities and multiple public remarks explicitly mention an oceanside/saltwater pool ('oceanside private pool', 'saltwater pool', 'ocean-side saltwater pool'). Mentions appear across several agent remarks and align with prior high-confidence data, indicating the pool is a genuine building amenity.
No analysis available
Public remarks repeatedly call out a saltwater pool and renovations to the saltwater pool, providing strong evidence that the building's pool is saltwater.
Confidence 80%: There is no prior confidence data; 1 of 2 current MLS listings includes WASHER/DRYER in inclusions, while the other does not, and the remarks do not discuss laundry locations. Even with only one listing showing it, this indicates that at least some units have their own washer/dryer, which is enough to treat in-unit laundry as available in the building.
All 9 current MLS listings list COMLAU. Remarks repeatedly state that in-unit washers/dryers are not typical ('convenient washer and dryer (not available in most units)') while some listings call out rare in-unit laundry, which implies a shared/community laundry for the building. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and supported by both the MLS amenity checkbox and the remarks, indicating a building-level laundry facility is present.
Searched for explicit terms such as 'coin laundry', 'paid laundry', 'card operated', 'quarters', or 'coin-op' in the public remarks and found none. The remarks note some units have in-unit washer/dryer and manager services, but no paid community laundry is described.
Searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found no evidence. Remarks instead reference in-unit washers/dryers for some units and manager-run storage/rentals, but nothing indicating laundry facilities on every floor.
Confidence 86%: There is no prior confidence data; in current MLS data 0/2 listings show any parking codes (OPEN/COVERE/GARAGE/ASSIGN etc.), and 1/2 explicitly has NONE selected for parking_features, with no remarks offering or highlighting any stall or on-site parking. Because parking is typically emphasized when present, its absence across both MLS structure and remarks indicates the building does not offer on-site parking stalls as a standard feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks describe parking coordination by waitlist rather than assigned or deeded stalls, which indicates parking is not deeded. Set to false with high confidence based on the explicit language.
No analysis available
Searched remarks for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or similar phrases and found none. Because there is no information about any monthly parking fee, the value is unknown (null) with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listing explicitly notes a parking waitlist system is used to coordinate stall assignment. This direct statement supports a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
Looked for explicit terms such as 'key card access', 'fob access', 'card reader', or 'keycard entry' and found none. The remarks reference a manager's office and resident manager activities but do not describe any card/fob access system.
No analysis available
Searched the public remarks for phrases like 'security patrol', 'roving security', or 'patrolled building' and found no evidence. The building is described as well-maintained with a resident manager, but no patrol service is referenced.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across listings: 9 of 9 current MLS listings list 'CONCRE' in construction_materials and prior data recorded high confidence (~95%). Public remarks reference a reinforced seawall, seawall/rock adjacency, and mid-century reinforced construction details consistent with a concrete building. Multiple agents consistently identify concrete construction, indicating high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 8 current listings include 'MASSTU' in construction_materials, and none of the public remarks mention 'masonry' or 'stucco'. Given the lack of descriptive confirmation and sparse checkbox appearance (suggesting copy/paste), it's unlikely the building should be characterized as masonry/stucco.
No analysis available
Only 2 of 8 listings list 'SLAB' in construction_materials and none of the public remarks reference a 'concrete slab' or slab foundation. With no historical support and no remarks confirming a slab foundation, the evidence suggests the slab attribute is not a reliable building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is weak/inconsistent: only 3 of 9 MLS listings list 'ABOGRO' and none of the public remarks mention 'above ground' construction or above-ground-specific materials. Given the absence of corroborating remarks and the inconsistent checkbox usage across agents, the feature is likely not a reliable building-level attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Reviewed the remarks for explicit allowance of short-term rentals (e.g., 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'NUC', 'TVU') and found none. The cooperative ownership and board-approval language suggest STRs are not indicated, so STR allowed is set to false with medium confidence.
There is no wording about any hotel rental pool, hotel-managed program, or participation in hotel operations in the public remarks. Because short-term rentals are not indicated, hotel-pool participation is set to false with high confidence.
The public remarks contain no language about a required or mandatory rental pool and do not reference any rental program; furthermore STRs are not indicated. Therefore mandatory pool participation is set to false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly indicate the building owns the fee interest in its land parcels, so this is not a leasehold; therefore no lease expiry year is applicable. Returned null with high confidence.
Searched the public remarks for explicit VA loan language (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA loans accepted') and found no references. Because there is no evidence in the remarks to indicate VA approval, this is set to false with medium-low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly promote oceanfront and ocean views — quotes include 'oceanfront', 'breathtaking, unobstructed views of the Pacific Ocean', 'direct ocean access', and 'ocean-side saltwater pool'. At least several of the provided remarks reference oceanfront living across different units/levels, showing strong, building-level ocean view availability. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and aligns with historical high confidence.
No listings or remarks reference mountain or mauka/Koolau views — current MLS shows 0 of 9 listings with MOUNTA and the remark set contains no mountain-related phrasing. Strong evidence indicates the building does not offer mountain views.
Several remarks explicitly advertise Diamond Head views — e.g., 'Wake up to Diamond Head views from your bed' and 'in the shadow of Diamond Head' — indicating the building offers Diamond Head sightlines. Evidence is explicit across multiple agent remarks, supporting high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of nine MLS view_descriptions include 'GARDEN', and historical notes suggested prior high confidence for garden views, but none of the provided public remarks mention garden or courtyard vistas. This suggests some units may have garden/courtyard outlooks, but evidence is limited and possibly due to pick-box usage by agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence: one remark explicitly references 'sunrise to sunset' and 'sunrises,' matching MLS tags (1/8). Sunrise mentions are less frequent than ocean references, so confidence is moderate (implied rather than widespread across listings).
Good evidence: at least 3 separate remark segments explicitly mention sunsets ('sunsets', 'stunning sunsets', 'sunsets and natural breezes' and 'sunrise to sunset'), and MLS tags include SUNSET for multiple listings, so include the feature with high confidence.
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or 'see fireworks from unit' and found no mentions. The remarks describe ocean, sunset, and whale watching views but do not state views of fireworks from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical MLS data has strongly indicated a resident/on-site manager for this building and current MLS checkbox data shows RESMAN checked in 5 of 9 listings. Public remarks in one listing explicitly mention "manager's office" offering surfboard and bicycle rentals, which corroborates the MLS entries; evidence is consistent across agents and supports including resident_manager=true.
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence that the building is a cooperative: agent remarks across several listings explicitly state "This is a cooperative" and "The DH Ambassador is a COOP," and historical MLS data shows COOTAX in 7 of 9 recent listings. Multiple agents/reports consistently describe share transfer and board interview requirements, indicating the building operates as a co-op rather than a condo.
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.