Diamond Head Ambassador A
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Diamond Head Ambassador A
Building Overview
Diamond Head Ambassador A in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis — concrete building (1959) with ocean views, pool and resident manager.
About Diamond Head Ambassador A
Diamond Head Ambassador A is located in the Diamond Head‑Kapahulu‑St. Louis neighborhood. According to available records the building was built in 1959 and is of concrete construction. Specific unit count and square footage were not provided in the MLS data.
Key features reported in MLS data include ocean views, an on‑site pool, and a resident manager. The listing data also states that pets and short‑term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Additional details such as parking availability, maintenance fees, special assessments, and other building services were not included in the MLS extract. Based on MLS data, prospective buyers should verify parking, fees, rules, and any other items of interest with the listing agent or building management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Confidence 88%: There is no prior confidence data, and only 1 of 2 current MLS listings has CABTV checked in association_fee_includes while the other does not, and neither set of remarks mentions cable being included in the maintenance fee. Given the inconsistent checkbox use and lack of textual confirmation, this looks like agent variability rather than a reliable building-level inclusion.
OTCOEX appears in 5 of 10 current MLS listings, which suggests common-area electricity may be included. None of the public remarks explicitly mention common-area power or hallway/elevator electricity, so this is supported mainly by the MLS checkbox rather than agent description.
No analysis available
Electricity is very strongly supported by the current MLS data, with ELECTR checked in all 10 listings. Public remarks also directly confirm it, including the phrase 'Monthly dues ($790) INCLUDE ... ELECTRICITY,' making this the clearest feature in the set.
No analysis available
HOTWAT is present in 7/9 MLS records, and remarks reference building-wide plumbing upgrades and paid assessments, but none explicitly say 'hot water included.' The evidence is primarily from MLS checkboxes (implied) rather than clear agent remarks.
Confidence 88%: With no prior confidence data, only 1 of 2 current listings showing INTSER in association_fee_includes, and no remarks describing internet as being part of the maintenance fee, the evidence is too thin to treat this as a real building feature. The pattern matches common MLS checkbox noise.
No analysis available
Sewer is checked in all 10 current MLS listings, so the building-level inclusion appears consistent across the dataset. The remarks do not explicitly say 'sewer included,' but multiple listings mention the plumbing assessment/work being completed, which aligns with the MLS data.
Water is included in the current MLS data for all 10 listings, which is a strong building-level signal. The public remarks do not explicitly say 'water included,' so this relies primarily on the repeated MLS checkbox rather than narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Meeting room is supported by current MLS amenities in 7 of 11 listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly reference a meeting room, conference room, board room, hospitality room, or community room. This looks more like repeated MLS checkbox data than remark-based confirmation, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1/9 listings have the RECARE checkbox in MLS, and 0 of 9 public remarks explicitly mention a recreation area (search terms like 'recreation area', 'rec area', 'recreation deck', or 'amenity deck' not found). Remarks emphasize oceanfront pool and lawn but do not describe a separate shared 'recreation area', suggesting the single MLS check is likely copy/paste rather than a true building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported for this building. Across the provided remarks, at least 4 listings explicitly mention storage, including an assigned basement storage unit, onsite storage included, and bike/surfboard storage availability. The repeated references across different listings suggest this is a real building feature rather than copy-paste MLS noise.
There is direct public-remark evidence that surfboard storage is available on site. The wording is explicit, so this feature is confirmed.
No analysis available
Trash chute is supported by current MLS checkbox data in 7 of 11 listings, but the public remarks do not explicitly mention a trash, garbage, or refuse chute. Because the feature appears consistently across multiple listings yet lacks remark confirmation, confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that the building has a pool. Multiple listings mention it across different agents and unit types, including "saltwater pool," "oceanside private pool," and "renovated/upgraded pool," which strongly supports a shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste error. The pool appears to be a real, established feature of the building.
No analysis available
Multiple remarks directly state that the building has a saltwater pool. This is explicit and repeated, so confidence is very high.
Confidence 80%: There is no prior confidence data; 1 of 2 current MLS listings includes WASHER/DRYER in inclusions, while the other does not, and the remarks do not discuss laundry locations. Even with only one listing showing it, this indicates that at least some units have their own washer/dryer, which is enough to treat in-unit laundry as available in the building.
Strong building-level evidence supports community/shared laundry. Historical MLS data reportedly shows 11 of 11 listings with COMLAU, which is unusually consistent and suggests this is a real shared amenity rather than a copy-paste error. Current public remarks do not explicitly describe the laundry room, but nothing contradicts the amenity and one listing notes washer/dryer is "not available in most units," reinforcing that laundry access varies by unit and likely exists as a common facility.
I looked for explicit references to paid shared laundry such as 'coin laundry,' 'coin-op,' 'quarters,' 'card operated,' or a laundry fee. The remarks do not mention any community laundry system or payment requirement.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' and similar wording. No evidence was found that community laundry is available on every floor.
Parking is present but limited: 2 remarks explicitly mention it, including "No assigned parking; waitlist available" and "Use of parking stalls coordinated by waitlist." Although current MLS checkbox data is mostly blank or NONE, the remarks are consistent across listings and suggest parking stalls exist in the building rather than no parking at all.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for deeded, owned, or included parking stall language and found none. Instead, the listings repeatedly describe parking as unassigned and controlled by waitlist, which strongly suggests parking is not deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any stated parking cost, monthly charge, or parking rental fee and found nothing. The remarks only mention that parking is handled by waitlist and that street parking is nearby, but no fee is provided.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is clear, direct evidence that parking is managed through a waitlist system. Multiple listings say parking stalls are coordinated by waitlist, so this feature is confirmed.
No analysis available
I searched for card/fob access terms such as 'key card access,' 'fob access,' 'card reader,' and 'keycard entry.' The remarks mention management and board review, but nothing about a card-based security system.
No analysis available
I looked for references to security patrols, roving security, or patrolled building service. The remarks do not mention any security patrol presence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS and is consistent across all current listings. The public remarks do not contradict it and instead reinforce the building’s substantial construction quality (e.g., references to a "reinforced seawall" and major plumbing work in the complex).
Double wall construction is not supported by the public remarks. The feature appears in only 3 of 10 current MLS listings, which is too sparse to trust without direct confirmation. This looks more like inconsistent listing data than a confirmed building characteristic.
No analysis available
There is not enough reliable evidence to support masonry/stucco construction for the building. Across the provided remarks, no listing explicitly describes the structure as masonry or stucco, so the current MLS checkbox data looks inconsistent rather than confirmed by firsthand commentary.
No analysis available
There is no public-remarks evidence for a concrete slab foundation. The listings repeatedly discuss views, plumbing, pool updates, and unit renovations, but never describe the building as slab-constructed, so this feature appears unsupported from the available evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction is not corroborated by the public remarks. Although 4 of 10 current listings carry ABOGRO, none of the descriptions explicitly reference above-ground building construction. This is insufficient to treat as a confirmed feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental language such as STR allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, hotel-style rental, or minimum-stay exceptions and found none. With no evidence that short-term rentals are permitted, this is treated as not allowed based on the public remarks.
I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or branded rental pool participation and found none. Since there is also no evidence that STR is allowed, a hotel pool cannot be present here.
I searched for language indicating a mandatory rental pool, required participation, or inability to opt out and found nothing. Because the listings do not indicate any STR or hotel rental program, mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any ground lease, leasehold, or lease expiration language and found the opposite: the remarks say the building owns the fee interest in the land. Because no lease expiry is mentioned and the property is described as fee simple, there is no lease expiration year to extract.
I searched the public remarks for explicit language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found none. With no direct evidence, this is treated as not confirmed from the listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across the building. Current MLS data shows 10/11 listings with ocean in the view description, and remarks repeatedly use phrases like '180 degree panoramic ocean views,' 'breathtaking, unobstructed views of the Pacific Ocean,' and 'endless ocean views.' This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Mountain views appear to exist in at least some units, based on 3/11 current MLS listings tagged with mountain-related view descriptions. The provided remarks do not emphasize mountain views, so the evidence is weaker than for ocean or Diamond Head, but it still supports inclusion for buyers seeking this building feature.
Diamond Head views are explicitly confirmed in multiple listings. Current MLS data shows 4/11 listings with Diamond Head in the view description, and remarks directly reference 'Diamond Head views' and the building's location 'in the shadow of Diamond Head.' This is strong multi-listing evidence.
Only one of the current listings shows CITY in the MLS view descriptions, and none of the remarks explicitly advertise city views. Because buyers search for buildings that offer any city-view units, this is worth keeping as a tentative building-level feature, but the evidence is thin and may be agent copy-paste.
Coastline views are supported by the current MLS tagging and the building's repeated Gold Coast/oceanfront framing. With 6/11 listings carrying coastline-related view descriptions, this appears to be a legitimate feature available in some units. The remarks lean more toward oceanfront language than explicit 'coastline view,' but the overall evidence is strong enough to include it.
Garden-type views are supported by both MLS view data and the listing remarks. About half of the current listings show GARDEN, and multiple remarks reference "lush, landscaped grounds" and a "sunset lawn," suggesting the building offers at least some garden/courtyard-facing units. The evidence is moderate rather than explicit, but it is consistent across the available remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are moderately supported. Current MLS data shows 4/11 listings tagged with sunrise-related views, and at least one remark explicitly references 'sunrise to sunset,' which aligns with the MLS tagging. The evidence is good but less frequent than ocean or sunset mentions.
Sunset views are strongly supported. Current MLS data shows 6/11 listings with sunset-related view descriptions, and several remarks independently mention sunsets, including 'watch beautiful sunsets' and 'stunning sunsets.' The repeated language across multiple listings suggests a real building-level feature.
No analysis available
I searched for direct mentions of seeing Friday night fireworks from the building or units, such as 'fireworks view' or 'watch fireworks from the lanai.' The remarks mention ocean views, sunsets, and whales, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence points to an on-site manager/resident management setup: historical MLS data repeatedly showed RESMAN, and one remark explicitly references "the manager's office" with rentals handled there. The feature appears in building-level remarks rather than just unit-specific copy, suggesting it is a real shared building attribute.
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across many listings confirms the building is a co-op. Several remarks explicitly say "This is a co-op," "This is a cooperative," and describe ownership as a share of stock with a proprietary lease, which aligns with the COOTAX indicator in MLS data. The evidence appears repeated across multiple agents and is not just a one-off copy-paste error.
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.