Diamond Head Ambassador A
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Diamond Head Ambassador A
Building Overview
Diamond Head Ambassador A in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis — concrete building (1959) with ocean views, pool and resident manager.
About Diamond Head Ambassador A
Diamond Head Ambassador A is located in the Diamond Head‑Kapahulu‑St. Louis neighborhood. According to available records the building was built in 1959 and is of concrete construction. Specific unit count and square footage were not provided in the MLS data.
Key features reported in MLS data include ocean views, an on‑site pool, and a resident manager. The listing data also states that pets and short‑term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Additional details such as parking availability, maintenance fees, special assessments, and other building services were not included in the MLS extract. Based on MLS data, prospective buyers should verify parking, fees, rules, and any other items of interest with the listing agent or building management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Confidence 88%: There is no prior confidence data, and only 1 of 2 current MLS listings has CABTV checked in association_fee_includes while the other does not, and neither set of remarks mentions cable being included in the maintenance fee. Given the inconsistent checkbox use and lack of textual confirmation, this looks like agent variability rather than a reliable building-level inclusion.
Confidence 87%: There is no prior confidence data; just 1 of 2 current listings has OTCOEX checked, and the remarks do not address "other common expenses" or similar wording. The inconsistent MLS data suggests this is not a reliably tracked or emphasized feature for this building.
No analysis available
All 8 current MLS listings list ELECTR in association_fee_includes, and at least one public remark explicitly states "Monthly dues ($790) INCLUDE ... ELECTRICITY." Historical data had High confidence and there is no conflicting information across agent remarks, indicating strong evidence that electricity is included in the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
Confidence 88%: There is no prior confidence data and only 1 of 2 current MLS listings has HOTWAT checked, with 0/2 listing WTRHTR in inclusions and no remarks referencing hot water being included. The inconsistency across listings suggests a likely checkbox error rather than a confirmed building-level inclusion.
Confidence 88%: With no prior confidence data, only 1 of 2 current listings showing INTSER in association_fee_includes, and no remarks describing internet as being part of the maintenance fee, the evidence is too thin to treat this as a real building feature. The pattern matches common MLS checkbox noise.
No analysis available
All 8 current MLS listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes. Multiple remarks reference building-wide plumbing upgrades and paid plumbing assessments, and there is no contradictory language from agents, supporting that sewer service is included in the maintenance fees.
All 8 current MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes. Remarks mention plumbing updates and assessments being completed/paid, and no agent remarks contradict water being covered, supporting inclusion of water in the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks across the provided listings mention a meeting room, conference room, board room, hospitality room, or community room (0 of 8 remarks). Although CURRENT MLS metadata indicates 5/8 listings checked MEEROO, there is no corroborating language in agent remarks and no user verification; this suggests checkbox errors rather than an actual building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Building-level storage is well-supported: all 8 current listings include storage in the building amenities and 3 list it as a unit feature. Public remarks explicitly note 'Basement storage unit is assigned to the apartment,' confirming that lockers/storage units exist and are assigned to residences.
Searched for 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', or 'surf storage'. While surfboard rentals through the manager and an assigned basement storage unit are mentioned, there is no explicit statement that the building provides dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
None of the provided public remarks mention a trash chute, garbage chute, or refuse chute (0 of 8 remarks). While CURRENT MLS metadata shows TRACHU checked on 4/8 listings, there is no supporting descriptive text or user verification, indicating the checked boxes are likely agent copy/paste errors rather than confirmed building features.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that the building has a pool: MLS amenities list pool on all current listings (8/8), and multiple agent remarks explicitly mention a "saltwater pool" or "ocean-side/oceanside pool" across listings. Several remarks also note a renovated/updated saltwater pool and that the building is one of the few Gold Coast buildings with a pool, indicating reliable, multi-source confirmation.
No analysis available
Searched for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', etc. The listings explicitly call out a saltwater pool and renovations to that saltwater pool, so this is supported with high confidence.
Confidence 80%: There is no prior confidence data; 1 of 2 current MLS listings includes WASHER/DRYER in inclusions, while the other does not, and the remarks do not discuss laundry locations. Even with only one listing showing it, this indicates that at least some units have their own washer/dryer, which is enough to treat in-unit laundry as available in the building.
All 8 current MLS listings include the COMLAU amenity. Remarks mention "convenient washer and dryer (not available in most units)" and "in-unit washer/dryer," indicating some units have in-unit laundry but not ruling out building/shared laundry; no remarks explicitly describe removal of shared laundry. Evidence is strong across MLS checkbox data from multiple listings, so community laundry is likely present.
Looked for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'paid laundry', 'card operated', or 'quarters' in the remarks. The remarks do not describe any paid community laundry facilities.
Searched the remarks for phrases like 'laundry on every floor', 'laundry room on each floor', or 'floor-by-floor laundry'. The listing instead references in-unit washer/dryer availability for some units; there is no evidence of community laundry on every floor.
Confidence 86%: There is no prior confidence data; in current MLS data 0/2 listings show any parking codes (OPEN/COVERE/GARAGE/ASSIGN etc.), and 1/2 explicitly has NONE selected for parking_features, with no remarks offering or highlighting any stall or on-site parking. Because parking is typically emphasized when present, its absence across both MLS structure and remarks indicates the building does not offer on-site parking stalls as a standard feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks describe parking being coordinated via a waitlist rather than being assigned/deeded to units, so parking_deeded is false.
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or rental cost; none were found. Parking fee amount is unknown from the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listing explicitly indicates a parking waitlist system is used to coordinate parking stall use, so parking_waitlist is true with high confidence.
No analysis available
Looked for terms like 'key card access', 'fob access', or 'card reader'. The remarks do not mention electronic/card access systems.
No analysis available
Searched for 'security patrol', 'roving security', or similar phrases. The listing mentions a resident manager but does not mention any security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 of 8 current listings list 'CONCRE' in construction_materials and prior data indicated high confidence (95%) for concrete construction. Public remarks do not contradict concrete construction (no statements indicating otherwise), so evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 8 current listings include 'MASSTU' in construction_materials, and none of the public remarks mention 'masonry' or 'stucco'. Given the lack of descriptive confirmation and sparse checkbox appearance (suggesting copy/paste), it's unlikely the building should be characterized as masonry/stucco.
No analysis available
Only 2 of 8 listings list 'SLAB' in construction_materials and none of the public remarks reference a 'concrete slab' or slab foundation. With no historical support and no remarks confirming a slab foundation, the evidence suggests the slab attribute is not a reliable building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for explicit STR language and found none. Given the absence of any STR permission statements and the cooperative ownership structure, STRs are not indicated in the public remarks.
No phrasing such as 'hotel rental pool' or 'part of hotel operations' appears in the remarks. Because STRs are not indicated, participation in a hotel pool is not supported by the remarks.
There is no language about a mandatory rental program or required participation. Since STRs are not indicated in the remarks, a mandatory hotel pool is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building explicitly owns the fee interest in its land, so it is not a leasehold; therefore there is no lease expiry year to extract.
Searched the remarks for explicit VA loan language (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA loans accepted'). No such phrasing was found, so VA financing is presumed not indicated in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across many listings: at least 6 of the remark sets explicitly state oceanfront/ocean views (phrases include 'oceanfront', 'Pacific Ocean', 'blue-water views', 'direct ocean access', and 'ocean-side saltwater pool'). Evidence comes from multiple agents and appears substantive rather than a single copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: No prior confidence data exists, 0/2 MLS listings include GARDEN in view_descriptions, and the remarks focus entirely on ocean views and oceanfront living without any mention of garden or courtyard outlooks. This repeated emphasis on ocean exposure and complete absence of garden-view language make garden views unlikely to be a notable or marketed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence: one remark explicitly references 'sunrise to sunset' and 'sunrises,' matching MLS tags (1/8). Sunrise mentions are less frequent than ocean references, so confidence is moderate (implied rather than widespread across listings).
Good evidence: at least 3 separate remark segments explicitly mention sunsets ('sunsets', 'stunning sunsets', 'sunsets and natural breezes' and 'sunrise to sunset'), and MLS tags include SUNSET for multiple listings, so include the feature with high confidence.
No analysis available
Searched for explicit statements like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or 'see fireworks from unit'. The remarks describe ocean views, sunsets, and whale watching but do not mention fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical MLS checkbox data lists a resident manager in 4 of 8 listings and prior analysis rated this High confidence. The public remarks explicitly state "Surfboard and bicycle rentals available through the manager's office" and that parking is "coordinated by waitlist," which supports an on-site/accessible building manager. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and corroborates the historical data, so resident_manager is included with high confidence.
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building is a co-op: 6/8 current listings include COOTAX and several agent remarks explicitly call it a cooperative (quotes include "This is a cooperative, and requires an interview with the Board" and "The DH Ambassador is a COOP. Ownership is by way of the transfer of a share of stock"). Multiple listings from different agents consistently describe board approval and proprietary lease/share ownership, indicating the co-op status is well-documented rather than a copy-paste error.
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.