Diamond Head Ambassador A
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Diamond Head Ambassador A
Building Overview
Diamond Head Ambassador A in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis — concrete building (1959) with ocean views, pool and resident manager.
About Diamond Head Ambassador A
Diamond Head Ambassador A is located in the Diamond Head‑Kapahulu‑St. Louis neighborhood. According to available records the building was built in 1959 and is of concrete construction. Specific unit count and square footage were not provided in the MLS data.
Key features reported in MLS data include ocean views, an on‑site pool, and a resident manager. The listing data also states that pets and short‑term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Additional details such as parking availability, maintenance fees, special assessments, and other building services were not included in the MLS extract. Based on MLS data, prospective buyers should verify parking, fees, rules, and any other items of interest with the listing agent or building management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The MLS floor field reaches 6, and all nine listings agree between their floor fields and unit-number floors. There are no penthouse listings or county floor figure to provide stronger confirmation.
The county assessor reports 32 reconciled residential units for this single-building parcel, matching the stored value. No state registration or reliable MLS unit total is available.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Confidence 88%: There is no prior confidence data, and only 1 of 2 current MLS listings has CABTV checked in association_fee_includes while the other does not, and neither set of remarks mentions cable being included in the maintenance fee. Given the inconsistent checkbox use and lack of textual confirmation, this looks like agent variability rather than a reliable building-level inclusion.
OTCOEX appears in 5 of 10 current MLS listings, which suggests common-area electricity may be included. None of the public remarks explicitly mention common-area power or hallway/elevator electricity, so this is supported mainly by the MLS checkbox rather than agent description.
No analysis available
Electricity is very strongly supported by the current MLS data, with ELECTR checked in all 10 listings. Public remarks also directly confirm it, including the phrase 'Monthly dues ($790) INCLUDE ... ELECTRICITY,' making this the clearest feature in the set.
No analysis available
HOTWAT is present in 7/9 MLS records, and remarks reference building-wide plumbing upgrades and paid assessments, but none explicitly say 'hot water included.' The evidence is primarily from MLS checkboxes (implied) rather than clear agent remarks.
Confidence 88%: With no prior confidence data, only 1 of 2 current listings showing INTSER in association_fee_includes, and no remarks describing internet as being part of the maintenance fee, the evidence is too thin to treat this as a real building feature. The pattern matches common MLS checkbox noise.
No analysis available
Sewer is included in 9 of 10 current MLS records, providing strong multi-listing evidence. No public remarks explicitly mention sewer fees, but there are also no contradictions, and the consistent MLS data supports retaining this feature.
Water is included in 9 of 10 current MLS records, a strong building-level signal across multiple listings. No public remarks explicitly mention included water fees, but the remarks provide no conflicting information and support retaining the feature based on the consistent MLS data.
None of the 10 listings mention BBQ or grilling facilities. With only 1 of 10 listings checking the amenity and no supporting remarks, evidence that the building offers BBQ facilities is weak and likely reflects an unverified listing entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of 10 listings currently identify a meeting-room amenity, but none of the 10 public remarks provide explicit confirmation or quote related terminology. The repeated MLS checkbox support suggests the feature may exist, though the evidence could reflect copied MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1/9 listings have the RECARE checkbox in MLS, and 0 of 9 public remarks explicitly mention a recreation area (search terms like 'recreation area', 'rec area', 'recreation deck', or 'amenity deck' not found). Remarks emphasize oceanfront pool and lawn but do not describe a separate shared 'recreation area', suggesting the single MLS check is likely copy/paste rather than a true building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported across multiple listings and agents. Key remarks include "Large onsite storage unit included," "ample storage space," and "Basement storage unit is assigned to the apartment," with additional references to built-in foyer storage and bike/surfboard storage. This confirms the building offers storage units or lockers rather than reflecting a copy-pasted checkbox alone.
The listing directly confirms on-site surfboard storage. This explicit public-remark evidence establishes the feature with high confidence.
No analysis available
Six of 10 listings currently identify a trash-chute amenity, while none of the 10 public remarks explicitly reference a chute system. Repeated checkbox support provides moderate evidence, but the lack of remark confirmation leaves open the possibility of copied or unverified MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 6 of 10 current listing remarks explicitly mention the building pool, including an "oceanfront saltwater pool," "oceanside private pool," and a "renovated saltwater pool." The evidence is consistent across multiple units and agents and aligns with 10/10 MLS amenity records, strongly confirming that the building has a pool.
No analysis available
Several remarks directly identify the building pool as saltwater, including descriptions of an upgraded or renovated saltwater pool. The feature is confirmed with very high confidence.
At least 2 of 10 listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry, including “convenient washer and dryer” and “in-unit washer/dryer.” The feature is not building-wide—one listing says it is “not available in most units”—but it is a legitimate offering in some units, so buyers searching for in-unit laundry should consider the building.
Strong building-level evidence supports community/shared laundry. Historical MLS data reportedly shows 11 of 11 listings with COMLAU, which is unusually consistent and suggests this is a real shared amenity rather than a copy-paste error. Current public remarks do not explicitly describe the laundry room, but nothing contradicts the amenity and one listing notes washer/dryer is "not available in most units," reinforcing that laundry access varies by unit and likely exists as a common facility.
The remarks were searched for coin laundry, coin-op, quarters, card-operated laundry, laundry fees, and other paid shared-laundry references. Although one remark mentions surfboard and bicycle rentals for a fee, it does not mention paid community laundry.
The remarks were searched for laundry on each floor, laundry rooms on every floor, and similar floor-by-floor wording. No such evidence was found, so this feature is treated as absent with medium-low confidence.
Two current listings explicitly mention parking access, including “Use of parking stalls coordinated by waitlist” and “No assigned parking; waitlist available.” The evidence supports limited building parking rather than no parking; the frequent NONE checkbox likely reflects the absence of an assigned stall for individual units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings were searched for deeded parking, owned parking, parking included in the deed, or an owned stall. None were found; instead, parking is described as being allocated through a waitlist, indicating that stalls are not deeded to the units.
No analysis available
The remarks mention that parking stalls are coordinated by waitlist but do not provide a parking cost. No specific monthly or one-time parking fee could be extracted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
A parking waitlist system is directly confirmed in the public remarks. This is clear evidence that parking availability is managed through a waiting list.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for key-card access, fob access, card readers, electronic access, and keycard entry. No evidence of a card or fob security system was found.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for security patrol, roving security, patrol service, and similar wording. No security patrol service is mentioned.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 10 current listings identify concrete construction materials (CONCRE), providing strong, consistent building-level evidence. Public remarks do not explicitly state 'concrete,' but they also contain no contradiction, so the feature remains well supported.
Three of 10 current listings include the DOUWAL construction-material code, but none of the supplied public remarks explicitly mention double-wall construction. The feature is therefore retained based on the prior high-confidence assessment and partial current MLS support, though it is not confirmed consistently across agents.
No analysis available
There is not enough reliable evidence to support masonry/stucco construction for the building. Across the provided remarks, no listing explicitly describes the structure as masonry or stucco, so the current MLS checkbox data looks inconsistent rather than confirmed by firsthand commentary.
No analysis available
There is no public-remarks evidence for a concrete slab foundation. The listings repeatedly discuss views, plumbing, pool updates, and unit renovations, but never describe the building as slab-constructed, so this feature appears unsupported from the available evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction is not corroborated by the public remarks. Although 4 of 10 current listings carry ABOGRO, none of the descriptions explicitly reference above-ground building construction. This is insufficient to treat as a confirmed feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for explicit short-term rental permission and related terms, but none were found. The general rental-income statement does not establish that short-term rentals are allowed, so STR permission is treated as false.
The listings contain no references to a hotel rental pool or hotel-operated rental program. Because short-term rental permission is not established, hotel-pool participation must also be false.
The remarks do not mention any required rental pool or mandatory participation program. Since STR is not established as allowed and no hotel pool is identified, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is described as a cooperative with an assignment of a proprietary lease for unit use, but it owns the fee interest in the underlying land. No ground lease or land lease expiry year was mentioned, so the lease expiry is not applicable or unknown.
The public remarks were searched for explicit VA financing language, including “VA approved,” “VA financing,” and “VA loans accepted.” No such references were found, so there is no evidence that the building is VA loan approved.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Current MLS data shows OCEAN in 10 of 10 listings, with no NONE entries. Multiple independent remarks explicitly describe oceanfront or panoramic ocean views, including 'endless ocean views,' 'breathtaking, unobstructed views of the Pacific Ocean,' and '300 degree ocean views.'
Mountain views appear to exist in at least some units, based on 3/11 current MLS listings tagged with mountain-related view descriptions. The provided remarks do not emphasize mountain views, so the evidence is weaker than for ocean or Diamond Head, but it still supports inclusion for buyers seeking this building feature.
Current MLS data identifies Diamond Head in 4 of 10 listings, with no NONE entries. Remarks also reference 'Wake up to Diamond Head views' and the building being 'in the shadow of Diamond Head,' confirming that the building offers units with this view.
Only one of the current listings shows CITY in the MLS view descriptions, and none of the remarks explicitly advertise city views. Because buyers search for buildings that offer any city-view units, this is worth keeping as a tentative building-level feature, but the evidence is thin and may be agent copy-paste.
Current MLS data shows COASTL in 7 of 10 listings, with no NONE entries. Multiple remarks independently describe the property as being on 'one of Honolulu's most iconic stretches of coastline,' 'situated on the ocean's edge,' and along the 'Gold Coast shoreline,' providing strong building-level confirmation.
Garden-related views appear in 5 of 10 current MLS listings, indicating that some units offer this outlook. The remarks mention Kapiolani Park and a 'sunset lawn,' which are compatible with landscaped or garden-facing views, though the evidence is less explicit than for ocean or Diamond Head views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise-related views are tagged in 4 of 10 current MLS listings, with no NONE entries. One listing specifically states that panoramic ocean views can be enjoyed 'from sunrise to sunset,' while another references morning swims and the morning coastal setting.
Sunset views are strongly supported. Current MLS data shows 6/11 listings with sunset-related view descriptions, and several remarks independently mention sunsets, including 'watch beautiful sunsets' and 'stunning sunsets.' The repeated language across multiple listings suggests a real building-level feature.
No analysis available
The remarks describe ocean views, sunsets, whales, and Diamond Head views, but do not state that fireworks can be seen from the units or building. No qualifying fireworks-view evidence was found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence points to an on-site manager/resident management setup: historical MLS data repeatedly showed RESMAN, and one remark explicitly references "the manager's office" with rentals handled there. The feature appears in building-level remarks rather than just unit-specific copy, suggesting it is a real shared building attribute.
No analysis available
The building is clearly a co-op: at least 2 listings explicitly identify it as a cooperative/COOP, including one describing share-of-stock and proprietary-lease ownership, while 7 of 10 current listings contain the strong COOTAX indicator. Evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and supports the previously high-confidence classification.
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.