Crescent Park

All available MLS property records for this building agree on a 1970 construction year. No remarks indicate a different build year or complete rebuild.

Listings repeatedly reference a '17th Floor' unit and property data confirms units up to floor 17. No listing mentions any higher floors or penthouse level, so the building is treated as 17 stories tall.

At least one listing describes Crescent Park as 'a boutique building with only 62 units total.' No alternate unit totals are mentioned across the other remarks, so 62 units is adopted.

The provided current value of 40.00% owner occupancy is retained because remarks do not mention owner-occupancy. I searched all listings for explicit owner-occupancy statements and found none, so the number is kept with low confidence.

Public remarks confirm the presence of elevators but never state how many. I searched all remarks for explicit counts (e.g., '2 elevators', 'two elevators', 'four elevators') and found none, so I retain the current value of 2 with low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

No listings indicate central AC in the HOA inclusions, and none of the public remarks reference central air or AC as an included utility. The building is repeatedly marketed as naturally cooled by trade winds, so central AC being included in fees is very unlikely.

10 of 16 current MLS listings have CABTV in association_fee_includes and prior reviews rated cable inclusion as Medium confidence (9 of 13). None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'cable' or 'internet'—evidence is primarily from repeated MLS checkbox entries across multiple agents, which could be copy/paste; included with implied confidence.

MLS association_fee_includes lists OTCOEX (common area electricity) in 14 of 18 current listings and historical confidence was High. Public remarks for this listing do not explicitly mention common-area electric but do not contradict the MLS data. Evidence is strong across multiple agents/checkboxes and consistent with prior reviews, so maintenance likely includes common area electricity.

No listing indicates co-op taxes in the fee inclusions, and the building is consistently described as a condo, not a co-op. This makes it virtually certain that cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fees.

None of the recent listings check the MLS box for electricity included in HOA fees. Given the lack of any remark mentioning power included, it is very likely that unit electricity is billed separately and not part of the maintenance fee.

No listing shows gas in the association fee inclusions, and there is no mention of gas appliances or gas utilities in the remarks. This strongly indicates that gas is not included in the maintenance fees (and may not be present at all).

Only 1 of 15 current MLS listings includes HOTWAT, while 14 of 15 explicitly list WTRHTR (water heater) as an in-unit inclusion. Public remarks repeatedly mention washer/dryer and in-unit amenities but not building-supplied hot water; the presence of in-unit water heaters across almost all listings provides strong evidence that hot water is not included in the association fee.

MLS data lists INTSER in 14 of 18 current listings and prior dataset confidence was Medium. Public remarks for this unit do not clearly state 'internet included' (only a line item 'Cable $36.80'), so evidence is moderate and may reflect checkbox copy/paste across listings; include as likely but with moderate confidence.

None of the listings indicate marina fees or access as part of the HOA, and the remarks focus on proximity to beach, park, and zoo rather than any boating facility. This makes it virtually certain that marina costs are not included in the maintenance fees.

SEWER appears in association_fee_includes for 18 of 18 current MLS listings and historical confidence was High. Although public remarks do not explicitly mention sewer, the uniform MLS checkbox usage across listings makes it very likely sewer is included in the maintenance fee.

WATER appears in association_fee_includes for 18 of 18 current MLS listings with prior High confidence. Public remarks for this unit don’t mention water explicitly, but uniform MLS checkbox data across listings indicates water is included in the HOA/maintenance fee.

Strong evidence across the listing set: all 18 current MLS listings list BBQ in amenities and numerous remarks state 'Pool and BBQ area recently upgraded', 'BBQ area', or 'grill amenities'. The BBQ/pool area is repeatedly called out by different agents and appears to be a building-level common amenity available to buyers.

Public remarks in multiple listings clearly state 'Surfboard and bike storage available for small monthly cost,' directly confirming on-site bicycle storage. The same amenity is described consistently across more than one listing, indicating a real building feature rather than a copy/paste mistake. Even though agents are not checking the bike-storage box, the written remarks provide high-confidence evidence that bike storage exists.

Listings emphasize beach and park access but never mention boat slips, docks, or marina facilities. Given the location context and MLS data, the building clearly does not have a boat dock or marina access.

No public remarks mention any car wash or vehicle wash area, while only 3 of 15 MLS records show the car-wash checkbox. Given the historical high confidence that the building lacks a car wash and the absence of any descriptive remarks, the car wash feature is very likely not present (agent checkbox inconsistency suspected).

The building is repeatedly described as a “boutique” condo with limited amenities, and no listing mentions any clubhouse or community center. MLS data also omits this amenity entirely, supporting that a clubhouse is not present.

No remarks use the words 'concierge' or 'front desk,' even where building operations are discussed. The presence of a resident manager without any concierge-related language suggests there is management but not a true concierge service.

Remarks note pet policies only in terms of asking the listing agent, without describing any on-site pet or dog park facilities. With no text or MLS support for such an amenity, the building does not appear to have a dog park.

Agents consistently refer to an 'on-site resident manager' but never to a doorman or lobby attendant, which would normally be a strong selling point if present. The combination of detailed remarks and unchecked MLS data strongly indicates there is no doorman service.

Across 13 listings, none of the remarks reference a gym, fitness center, or exercise room. The MLS amenities checkbox for exercise room is never selected, and amenity descriptions are consistent and limited to pool and BBQ, indicating the building does not offer a fitness facility.

The building is described as a boutique condo with modest amenities, not as a full-service luxury tower. With no mention of complimentary car or limo services, this amenity can be safely ruled out.

Amenity lists focus on pool, BBQ, resident manager, security, and storage, with no indication of any formal meeting or conference space. The consistent omission in both remarks and MLS suggests the building does not offer a meeting room.

At least 8 of 13 listings mention lanais (wrap-around, open, and enclosed) as major features of the units. Phrases like '300 sq ft wrap-around lanai' and 'large enclosed lanai' show that patio/deck-style outdoor spaces are typical in this building, not a one-off penthouse feature.

The area offers outdoor recreation, but there is no explicit mention of a jogging or walking path within the building’s grounds. MLS data also omits this feature, so the building is not represented as having its own jogging path.

Family-friendly attractions like the park and zoo are emphasized, but no common-area play structure or kids’ playground is described within the building. The consistent MLS and remarks pattern indicates there is no playground amenity.

Across all remarks the outdoor references are only to lanais, the pool, BBQ area, and nearby Kapiolani Park or the beach. The building is an older boutique high-rise in Waikiki, making private yards for units highly unlikely.

Amenity descriptions are brief and consistent and never include any golf or putting facilities. Given the building’s small, boutique profile and lack of MLS indication, a putting green is very unlikely to exist.

Amenities are described specifically as an outdoor pool and BBQ area rather than a general recreation deck or rec area. With no explicit references and no MLS support, the building is unlikely to have a separate recreation area beyond the pool/BBQ space.

Agents consistently list amenities as pool, BBQ area, resident manager, security, and storage, with no reference to a rec room or game room. The absence from both remarks and MLS checkboxes indicates there is no dedicated recreation room.

Dining options are clearly off-site in the surrounding Waikiki area. The absence of any on-premises restaurant in multiple descriptions and MLS confirms the building does not include its own restaurant.

Agents highlight views from lanais and units but never reference a shared rooftop terrace or deck. The lack of mention across many listings and the absence from MLS amenities indicate there are no rooftop amenities.

Amenity descriptions are consistent and limited to pool, BBQ, resident manager, security, and storage. The total absence of any reference to a sauna supports that the building does not have this feature.

Multiple listings describe 'Surfboard and bike storage available for small monthly cost,' showing the building offers dedicated storage areas beyond the unit. This phrasing appears in at least two separate listings, suggesting a stable building amenity rather than a one-off agent error. Although only 1/13 MLS entries mark storage in amenities, the repeated remarks provide stronger evidence that storage units/lockers are available.

Several remarks explicitly mention surfboard (and bike) storage available for a small monthly fee, providing high-confidence confirmation that surfboard storage exists in the building.

Remarks repeatedly highlight proximity to Kapiolani Park’s tennis courts, but never describe any on-site tennis facility. Combined with the MLS showing no tennis court amenity, this strongly indicates the building does not have its own tennis court.

Moderately strong evidence: 13 of 18 current MLS listings include a trash chute in amenities and at least one public remark explicitly mentions 'Elevators and trash chute are just a few steps from your front door'. While fewer remarks reference it (suggesting some agent copy/paste in checkboxes), the combination of historical checkbox prevalence and an explicit remark supports inclusion.

Parking is consistently described as assigned covered stalls plus a few guest stalls, with no reference to any staffed parking services. Given 13 detailed listings and no mention of valet, the building very likely does not offer valet service.

Remarks talk about 'covered ground-level parking near the main entrance' and 'four guest stalls' but never mention a gate, perimeter wall, or fenced enclosure. Given the urban Waikiki setting and lack of any 'gated' or 'fenced' language, the building likely does not have wall or fence perimeter security.

The whirlpool reference applies to a private bathtub within a unit rather than a common-area spa amenity. Since MLS amenities and other listings do not describe any shared whirlpool or hot tub, the building does not offer a whirlpool facility.

Strong, consistent evidence across the listing set (18 of 18 MLS listings) confirms a common pool: remarks repeatedly state phrases like "tiled pool", "tiled swimming pool", "swimming pool" and "outdoor pool/BBQ area." Mentions appear in many separate remark blocks from different agents rather than a single isolated comment, indicating the pool is a genuine shared building amenity.

Although many listings mention a 'pool', 'swimming pool', or 'outdoor pool', none describe it as 'heated' and no MLS records select any heated-pool feature. This consistent omission across all available data supports the conclusion that the building’s pool is not heated.

Searched for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline pool' language. The pool is described as tiled/upgraded and recently upgraded, but no indication it is a salt-water pool.

Building-level evidence is strong: at least six separate public remarks explicitly state in-unit laundry (quotes include "washer/dryer in the unit", "Wash & Dryer in Unit", and "Full size washer and dryer"). Current MLS inclusions list washer/dryer for all 18 listings and multiple agents/remarks consistently confirm it (while one remark notes an "exclusive laundry room" for a specific unit, the preponderance of listings indicate in-unit washers/dryers). Given the consistent historic and current data across many listings, include laundry_in_unit.

Across all provided listings, building amenities are described repeatedly, but there is no mention of shared or community laundry despite consistent mention of other amenities. Combined with 0/13 MLS amenities for community laundry and repeated emphasis on in‑unit washers/dryers, the evidence suggests the building does not have separate community laundry facilities.

Searched for 'coin laundry', 'paid laundry', 'coin-op', 'quarters', or 'card operated' language. Remarks instead mention in-unit washers/dryers and an 'exclusive laundry room' for a unit; no evidence of paid community laundry.

Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or 'floor-by-floor laundry'. Listings reference in-unit washers/dryers and one 'exclusive laundry room' for a unit, but there is no statement that community laundry exists on every floor.

The building clearly provides parking, with nearly every listing describing a dedicated stall or space. Phrases like '1 assigned garaged parking' and 'one covered parking stall' appear across multiple agents’ remarks, aligning with 13/13 MLS records showing parking features selected.

Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: CURRENT MLS shows 13/18 listings with ASSIGN and several remarks explicitly state 'assigned' or '1 assigned' (examples: 'One assigned covered parking stall', '1 assigned garaged parking'). Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks and align with historical high confidence, so assigned parking is included.

Strong evidence for covered parking: CURRENT MLS checkbox data flags covered/garage in 17/18 listings and numerous remarks explicitly mention 'covered parking stall', 'garaged parking', or 'covered ground-level parking'. The consistency across multiple listings and agents supports high confidence.

Multiple listings state the sale includes or an assigned/covered parking stall (e.g., 'The sale includes one covered parking stall', 'one assigned covered parking stall'), which implies parking is conveyed with the unit, but none of the public remarks explicitly use 'deeded', 'owned parking', or 'parking included in deed'. Because deeded status is only determined by explicit wording in remarks, there is no clear confirmation of 'deeded' parking.

There is no reference to EV or charging stations in any of the marketing remarks, even where other amenities are carefully listed. Combined with 0/13 MLS checkboxes for EV charging, this strongly indicates the building does not currently offer EV parking or chargers.

I searched for phrases like 'monthly parking fee', 'parking rental', or dollar amounts tied to parking and found none. Remarks mention 'surfboard and bike storage available for small monthly cost' but do not state a parking fee for resident stalls.

Evidence that the building offers guest parking: CURRENT MLS shows 10/18 listings with GUEST checked and several remarks explicitly note guest stalls (e.g., 'four guest stalls', 'Two guest stalls'). Mentions appear in multiple listings and corroborate MLS checkbox data, supporting inclusion.

Listings emphasize building security with comments like 'secured entry' and 'video surveillance,' and tie parking to these secured access points (e.g., stalls 'near the main entrance' and 'next to secured entrance'). While not explicitly calling it 'gated parking,' the combination of remarks and an MLS SECENT flag suggests parking is within a secured-access area.

Parking is consistently described as a single stall or space per unit without any reference to tandem or back-to-back layouts. The complete absence of TANDEM in MLS records supports that tandem parking is not offered here.

The building is characterized as a boutique condo with self-park covered stalls and guest stalls, but no listings reference any valet or attended parking. With MLS also never marking VALET, it is safe to conclude valet parking is not provided.

I reviewed all remarks for language about a parking waitlist or waiting list and found none. Listings consistently describe assigned/covered parking stalls and guest stalls but do not reference any waitlist system.

Remarks highlight convenience of elevators ('one covered parking stall located close to elevators') but do not describe them as keyed, fob-access, or restricted. Given the detailed mention of other security features without any elevator-security language, keyed elevator access is unlikely.

Searched for 'key card access', 'fob', 'card reader', or 'keycard entry' phrases. While the building is described as having secured entry and video surveillance, there is no explicit mention of card/fob-based access.

No remarks reference a security guard, 24-hour security, or on-site security staff, even when agents highlight other building features. With 0/13 MLS entries marking a guard and no textual evidence, this building is very likely not staffed by a security guard service.

Searched for 'security patrol', 'patrol service', 'roving security' phrases. Listings reference an on-site resident manager and secured entry/video surveillance, but do not indicate any security patrol service.

At least two listings describe the building as having 'secured entrance, video surveillance' or 'secured entry, video surveillance,' directly confirming video security. Other agents reference a 'secure building,' supporting that some form of camera-based security is in place.

0 of 13 listings indicate central A/C in MLS checkboxes, and no public remarks reference central air, HVAC, or forced-air systems. Instead, agents highlight natural ventilation (trade winds, cooler side of building, open-air hallways), strongly suggesting there is no central air conditioning system in the building.

1 of 13 listings has the split A/C inclusion box checked, and no remarks say the building prohibits or entirely lacks A/C systems. Although no remarks explicitly tout mini-splits, this MLS evidence suggests at least one unit has a split system, so the building is treated as offering split A/C in some units.

MLS inclusion ACWIUN appears in 5 of 17 current listings (historically 3 of 13, Medium confidence). None of the public remarks explicitly state 'window AC' or 'window unit'—remarks emphasize natural trade-wind breezes and open lanais instead—so agent copy/paste is possible. Because multiple current listings still check ACWIUN, we include window_ac=true with moderate confidence (0.75) to reflect that some units likely have window air conditioners even though remarks don’t confirm it.

All 18 current MLS listings list construction_materials=CONCRE, representing unanimous agent-entered data across the building. Public remarks across listings do not explicitly say 'concrete' (they focus on amenities, views, lanais and upgrades), but the consistent MLS checkbox across all listings is strong evidence that the building is constructed with concrete.

Only 2/15 current MLS listings include DOUWAL and none of the public remarks mention 'double wall' (no quotes). This is weak and inconsistent evidence (may be agent checkbox error), so the building is marked as possibly having double-wall construction but with low confidence.

Across all listings there is no MLS or remarks evidence of hollow tile construction. Agents consistently only indicate concrete, so hollow tile is very unlikely as a primary construction type.

The MLS data never flags masonry/stucco for this building, and public remarks describe it as a typical older Waikiki condo tower rather than a masonry-stucco low- or mid-rise. This makes masonry/stucco construction highly unlikely as a primary type.

MLS data never indicates steel frame for this building, while all records consistently mark concrete construction instead. In the absence of any mention of steel framing across many agents, steel-frame construction can be ruled out with high confidence.

Very little support for slab foundation: 1 of 17 current listings show SLAB in the MLS field, but historical data consistently showed no slab construction and none of the public remarks mention 'slab' or 'concrete slab'. The single MLS entry appears to be an outlier / likely data entry error, so slab foundation is not supported.

No analysis available

No listing selects wood frame in MLS, and remarks consistently describe a multi-story concrete-style tower rather than a low-rise wood building. Given the building height and location, primary wood-frame construction would be highly unlikely.

Several listings (5 of 13) explicitly flag above-ground construction (ABOGRO) in MLS, and descriptions of covered ground-level parking with residential units above fit this classification. No remarks contradict this, so above-ground construction is supported with moderate confidence.

No agent marks brick construction in MLS, and none of the public remarks mention brick facades or brick-and-mortar construction. The style and location strongly match concrete high-rise condos, not brick buildings.

No listing indicates single-wall construction and none of the narratives reference it; instead, they describe a multi-story condo with elevators and concrete-like characteristics. Given the building form, single-wall construction can be confidently excluded.

Public remarks consistently require minimum 30-day rentals and explicitly disallow nightly/weekly rentals, indicating that short-term (nightly/weekly) rentals are not allowed. This is explicitly stated across many listings.

There is no evidence in the public remarks of a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program. Because short-term nightly/weekly rentals are disallowed, hotel rental-pool participation would not apply.

No remarks indicate a mandatory rental-pool program or required participation. Given STRs are not allowed (30-day minimum), mandatory hotel-pool participation is not applicable.

Two of the 13 listings clearly advertise 'Fee Simple' ownership at Crescent Park. Other listings don’t contradict this, indicating the building includes both fee simple and leasehold units.

At least six of the 13 listings are clearly leasehold, using terms like 'LEASEHOLD Property,' 'leasehold boutique condo,' and 'Leasehold land tenure until 2046' with stated lease rents. The building therefore has both leasehold and fee simple units; among explicit mentions, at least 6 listings are LH and 2 are FS, with one lease reported expiring in 2046.

Several listings explicitly identify the property as leasehold and give the lease expiry year as 2046, so I use 2046 as the lease expiry year. This is consistent across multiple remarks.

I searched all public remarks for explicit VA loan language such as 'VA approved', 'VA financing' or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. No listing text indicates VA approval or VA-specific financing options.

I searched the remarks for terms such as 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage', and 'comprehensive building insurance' and found no references. Because there is no explicit mention, the field is set to false with medium confidence.

Across 13 listings, agents repeatedly highlight building features such as pool, BBQ, security, and resident manager, but none mention fire sprinklers or a sprinkler system, and 12/13 listings do not check the sprinkler amenity. This pattern strongly indicates the building is not fully sprinklered and that the lone checkbox is inaccurate.

I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', and 'passed fire inspection' and found no references. With no explicit statement in the remarks and no current positive value, the feature is set to false with medium confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Multiple unit remarks explicitly reference ocean views and proximity to Waikiki Beach (e.g., 'ocean', 'steps from the Beach', 'panoramic views'). CURRENT MLS DATA lists OCEAN in 4/18 view_descriptions, and numerous agents reiterate ocean/water-facing aspects, indicating strong building-level availability of ocean-view units.

Several listings specifically mention mountain/Koolau/Mauka views (phrases like 'Koolau Mountains', 'mountain', 'mauka'). CURRENT MLS DATA lists MOUNTA in 7/18 view_descriptions and agent remarks consistently reference mountain vistas, supporting inclusion at the building level.

Numerous remarks emphasize Diamond Head views (e.g., 'Diamond Head', 'watch the low sun rays lighting up Diamond Head', 'unobstructed views of Diamond Head'). With DIAHEA present in CURRENT MLS DATA and widespread mention across agents, Diamond Head views are strongly supported for the building.

Multiple listings mention city and skyline views (phrases like 'Waikiki skyline', 'city views'). CURRENT MLS DATA shows CITY in several listings and agent remarks consistently reference urban/downtown vistas, indicating the building offers city-view units.

Remarks emphasize coastal living, ocean proximity, and 'coastal' lifestyle (e.g., 'coastal living', 'steps from the Beach'), and COASTL appears in some MLS entries. Although explicit 'coastline' wording is less frequent, the repeated ocean/coastal context implies coastline-view units exist.

Several remarks highlight views of Kapiolani Park and "Park, Zoo" across the street, which are effectively landscaped/garden-type outlooks. Coupled with one MLS listing checking GARDEN, this supports that some units have garden/park views.

At least one remark explicitly lists 'Ala Wai Golf Course' as a view alongside Diamond Head and skyline. While less frequently mentioned than ocean/diamond head, the explicit reference (and an MLS GOLCOU flag historically) indicates some units have golf course views.

Marina/canal-type views have limited support: 2 of 17 MLS view_descriptions mark MARCAN but none of the public remarks explicitly say "marina", "harbor" or "canal". This yields moderate (implied) confidence that some units may have marina/canal views, but agent remarks do not corroborate.

Several listings explicitly mention sunrise/morning sun and eastern exposure (e.g., 'Watch sunrise over Diamond Head', 'sunrise views'). Combined with SUNRIS in CURRENT MLS DATA, this supports that sunrise views are available in the building.

Sunset views are less frequently noted but do appear: 1 of 16 current listings flags sunset and several remarks explicitly say "gorgeous sunset and sunrise views" and "enjoy... gorgeous sunset and sunrise views." While less common than other view types, multiple remarks confirm that some units have sunset/western exposures.

Across all remarks, views are of Diamond Head, ocean, park, zoo, golf course, and city, with no hint of a cemetery. The complete absence of CEMETA in 13 MLS records and the described neighborhood context make cemetery views highly unlikely.

Searched for 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from', and similar phrases. Listings describe views of Diamond Head, ocean, mountains and rainbows, but do not mention views of fireworks from the building.

No analysis available

Remarks clearly indicate pets are permitted in some form, with explicit 'Comfort pets OK' and repeated invitations to 'Inquire...if you have a pet.' No listing states 'no pets', so the building should be treated as pets allowed, likely with restrictions/approval.

Strong, consistent evidence the building has a resident manager: MLS amenities show RESMAN for 18/18 listings, and numerous remarks explicitly state phrases like 'on-site resident manager' and 'resident manager'. The wording appears across multiple agent listings rather than a single outlier, so confidence is high that the feature exists.

The building is zoned Resort and allows 30+ day rentals, supporting medium-term vacation use but not nightly hotel operations. The absence of any hotel-related services or 'condotel' language across 13 listings strongly indicates it is not a condotel.

All available public remarks (17 listings) consistently describe Crescent Park as a condominium or fee-simple/leasehold property using phrases like 'condo', 'condominium', 'Fee Simple', and 'Leasehold' (e.g., 'Boutique condominium', 'FEE SIMPLE', 'Leasehold land tenure until 2046'). Current MLS checkbox metadata shows 0/17 listings with COOTAX in association_fee_includes, and no remarks mention cooperative or co‑op ownership. Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents, so the building should not be listed as a co-op.