Crescent Park

All available MLS property records for this building agree on a 1970 construction year. No remarks indicate a different build year or complete rebuild.

The county assessor and state registration both report 19 floors. Listings reach only floor 17 and have no penthouse listings, so they do not establish the top residential floor and are set aside.

The county assessor reports 62 reconciled residential units, and the state registration independently reports 62 units for this single-building registration. The 18 distinct listed unit numbers are only a listing sample, not the full count.

Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 260. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.

I searched for explicit elevator counts such as "2 elevators," "4 elevators," or "multiple elevators." The remarks confirm that elevators exist but provide no numeric count, so the current value of 2 is retained with low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

No listings indicate central AC in the HOA inclusions, and none of the public remarks reference central air or AC as an included utility. The building is repeatedly marketed as naturally cooled by trade winds, so central AC being included in fees is very unlikely.

10 of 16 current MLS listings have CABTV in association_fee_includes and prior reviews rated cable inclusion as Medium confidence (9 of 13). None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'cable' or 'internet'—evidence is primarily from repeated MLS checkbox entries across multiple agents, which could be copy/paste; included with implied confidence.

None of the 20 reviewed listings explicitly mention common-area electricity, common electric, or building power being included in maintenance fees. The 16/20 OTCOEX entries are unsupported by remarks and may reflect generic or copied MLS coding, so this feature is omitted.

No listing indicates co-op taxes in the fee inclusions, and the building is consistently described as a condo, not a co-op. This makes it virtually certain that cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fees.

None of the recent listings check the MLS box for electricity included in HOA fees. Given the lack of any remark mentioning power included, it is very likely that unit electricity is billed separately and not part of the maintenance fee.

No listing shows gas in the association fee inclusions, and there is no mention of gas appliances or gas utilities in the remarks. This strongly indicates that gas is not included in the maintenance fees (and may not be present at all).

Only 1 of 20 listings mentions HOTWAT, compared with 15 of 20 listing WTRHTR, which is strong evidence against building-supplied hot water being included. No public remark confirms hot water inclusion; the isolated HOTWAT entry appears likely to be an MLS data inconsistency or copy-paste error.

I found no public-remark support for internet being included in the HOA/maintenance fee. While current MLS data shows INTSER in many listings, the absence of any agent-confirmed internet language makes this feature unsubstantiated in the remarks.

None of the listings indicate marina fees or access as part of the HOA, and the remarks focus on proximity to beach, park, and zoo rather than any boating facility. This makes it virtually certain that marina costs are not included in the maintenance fees.

All 20 listings identify SEWER as included in the association fees. A listing explicitly says, "maintenance fees that cover water, sewer, trash, and cable," providing direct confirmation across the unanimous MLS data.

All 20 listings identify WATER as included in the association fees. The statement that "maintenance fees ... cover water, sewer, trash, and cable" directly confirms the feature, and the unanimous MLS data supports it across the building.

At least 14 listings explicitly mention the feature, using phrases such as "BBQ area," "pool and BBQ area," "tiled swimming pool and bbq area," and "grill amenities." The repeated confirmation across multiple listings and agents strongly supports that Crescent Park offers shared BBQ/grilling facilities.

Public remarks in multiple listings clearly state 'Surfboard and bike storage available for small monthly cost,' directly confirming on-site bicycle storage. The same amenity is described consistently across more than one listing, indicating a real building feature rather than a copy/paste mistake. Even though agents are not checking the bike-storage box, the written remarks provide high-confidence evidence that bike storage exists.

Listings emphasize beach and park access but never mention boat slips, docks, or marina facilities. Given the location context and MLS data, the building clearly does not have a boat dock or marina access.

No public remarks mention any car wash or vehicle wash area, while only 3 of 15 MLS records show the car-wash checkbox. Given the historical high confidence that the building lacks a car wash and the absence of any descriptive remarks, the car wash feature is very likely not present (agent checkbox inconsistency suspected).

The building is repeatedly described as a “boutique” condo with limited amenities, and no listing mentions any clubhouse or community center. MLS data also omits this amenity entirely, supporting that a clubhouse is not present.

No remarks use the words 'concierge' or 'front desk,' even where building operations are discussed. The presence of a resident manager without any concierge-related language suggests there is management but not a true concierge service.

Remarks note pet policies only in terms of asking the listing agent, without describing any on-site pet or dog park facilities. With no text or MLS support for such an amenity, the building does not appear to have a dog park.

Agents consistently refer to an 'on-site resident manager' but never to a doorman or lobby attendant, which would normally be a strong selling point if present. The combination of detailed remarks and unchecked MLS data strongly indicates there is no doorman service.

Across 13 listings, none of the remarks reference a gym, fitness center, or exercise room. The MLS amenities checkbox for exercise room is never selected, and amenity descriptions are consistent and limited to pool and BBQ, indicating the building does not offer a fitness facility.

The building is described as a boutique condo with modest amenities, not as a full-service luxury tower. With no mention of complimentary car or limo services, this amenity can be safely ruled out.

Amenity lists focus on pool, BBQ, resident manager, security, and storage, with no indication of any formal meeting or conference space. The consistent omission in both remarks and MLS suggests the building does not offer a meeting room.

At least 8 of 13 listings mention lanais (wrap-around, open, and enclosed) as major features of the units. Phrases like '300 sq ft wrap-around lanai' and 'large enclosed lanai' show that patio/deck-style outdoor spaces are typical in this building, not a one-off penthouse feature.

The area offers outdoor recreation, but there is no explicit mention of a jogging or walking path within the building’s grounds. MLS data also omits this feature, so the building is not represented as having its own jogging path.

Family-friendly attractions like the park and zoo are emphasized, but no common-area play structure or kids’ playground is described within the building. The consistent MLS and remarks pattern indicates there is no playground amenity.

Across all remarks the outdoor references are only to lanais, the pool, BBQ area, and nearby Kapiolani Park or the beach. The building is an older boutique high-rise in Waikiki, making private yards for units highly unlikely.

Amenity descriptions are brief and consistent and never include any golf or putting facilities. Given the building’s small, boutique profile and lack of MLS indication, a putting green is very unlikely to exist.

There are no clear current remarks using "recreation area," "rec area," or "recreation deck." One listing references outdoor recreation in the surrounding neighborhood, but that is not a building amenity; the feature is retained only because historical evidence was previously high confidence, with reduced confidence due to weak current support.

Agents consistently list amenities as pool, BBQ area, resident manager, security, and storage, with no reference to a rec room or game room. The absence from both remarks and MLS checkboxes indicates there is no dedicated recreation room.

Dining options are clearly off-site in the surrounding Waikiki area. The absence of any on-premises restaurant in multiple descriptions and MLS confirms the building does not include its own restaurant.

Agents highlight views from lanais and units but never reference a shared rooftop terrace or deck. The lack of mention across many listings and the absence from MLS amenities indicate there are no rooftop amenities.

Amenity descriptions are consistent and limited to pool, BBQ, resident manager, security, and storage. The total absence of any reference to a sauna supports that the building does not have this feature.

Multiple listings describe 'Surfboard and bike storage available for small monthly cost,' showing the building offers dedicated storage areas beyond the unit. This phrasing appears in at least two separate listings, suggesting a stable building amenity rather than a one-off agent error. Although only 1/13 MLS entries mark storage in amenities, the repeated remarks provide stronger evidence that storage units/lockers are available.

Surfboard storage is directly confirmed in multiple public listings, including remarks pairing it with bike storage. The references indicate the storage is available for a small monthly cost.

Remarks repeatedly highlight proximity to Kapiolani Park’s tennis courts, but never describe any on-site tennis facility. Combined with the MLS showing no tennis court amenity, this strongly indicates the building does not have its own tennis court.

One listing explicitly mentions a "trash chute," while 17 of 20 current MLS records include TRACHU in the amenities. Although the phrase appears in only one provided remark, the strong MLS consistency plus direct building-specific confirmation supports the feature.

Parking is consistently described as assigned covered stalls plus a few guest stalls, with no reference to any staffed parking services. Given 13 detailed listings and no mention of valet, the building very likely does not offer valet service.

Remarks talk about 'covered ground-level parking near the main entrance' and 'four guest stalls' but never mention a gate, perimeter wall, or fenced enclosure. Given the urban Waikiki setting and lack of any 'gated' or 'fenced' language, the building likely does not have wall or fence perimeter security.

The whirlpool reference applies to a private bathtub within a unit rather than a common-area spa amenity. Since MLS amenities and other listings do not describe any shared whirlpool or hot tub, the building does not offer a whirlpool facility.

At least 15 of the 20 listing remarks explicitly mention the building pool, with repeated descriptions such as "heated pool," "tiled pool," "tiled swimming pool," and "outdoor pool." The evidence is strong across many listings and agents, not merely an isolated checkbox or copy-paste entry.

Heated pool is supported by direct language in the current remarks: "heated pool." The MLS amenities also show HEAPOO in 1 of 19 listings, which aligns with the remark and suggests the heated feature exists, though it is not consistently repeated across the full set.

A swimming pool is confirmed, consistent with the building context. However, no public remark identifies it as a saltwater pool.

In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the building: at least 7 current remarks explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit or a full-size washer and dryer, while current MLS data shows the feature in 20/20 listings. The repeated detailed mentions across multiple listings, including specific references to a new washer/dryer and an exclusive laundry room, confirm this is not merely unchecked or copied checkbox data.

Across all provided listings, building amenities are described repeatedly, but there is no mention of shared or community laundry despite consistent mention of other amenities. Combined with 0/13 MLS amenities for community laundry and repeated emphasis on in‑unit washers/dryers, the evidence suggests the building does not have separate community laundry facilities.

Listings primarily mention washers and dryers inside individual units. No paid community laundry or payment method is identified in the remarks.

The remarks describe in-unit washers and dryers and one unit's exclusive laundry room, but no community laundry facilities on every floor. No evidence supports this feature.

The building clearly provides parking, with nearly every listing describing a dedicated stall or space. Phrases like '1 assigned garaged parking' and 'one covered parking stall' appear across multiple agents’ remarks, aligning with 13/13 MLS records showing parking features selected.

Assigned parking is strongly supported by the current MLS pattern and multiple listing remarks. At least 3 listings explicitly use "assigned" or "assigned garaged parking," while several others describe a unit-specific included stall; the evidence is consistent across listings rather than limited to a single agent.

Covered parking is strongly validated across the building: current MLS data shows COVERE/CO1/CO2/CO3PLUS/GARAGE in 20/20 listings. At least 13 remarks explicitly mention phrases such as "covered parking," "one covered parking stall," "assigned covered parking stall," "garaged parking," or "covered ground-level parking," demonstrating consistent support across multiple listings rather than a single copied remark.

The remarks repeatedly indicate that one parking stall is associated with the unit, including descriptions such as "1 assigned covered parking stall" and "one covered parking space is included." No explicit deeded or separately owned parking language was found.

There is no reference to EV or charging stations in any of the marketing remarks, even where other amenities are carefully listed. Combined with 0/13 MLS checkboxes for EV charging, this strongly indicates the building does not currently offer EV parking or chargers.

The listings provide HOA, lease rent, assessments, and other monthly charges, but do not identify a fee for the included or assigned parking stall. References to a small monthly cost apply to surfboard or bike storage, not parking.

Guest parking is supported by both the current MLS pattern and several independent-looking remarks. At least 5 listings explicitly mention guest parking or specific guest-stall counts, including four guest stalls, providing strong evidence that the building offers visitor parking.

Listings emphasize building security with comments like 'secured entry' and 'video surveillance,' and tie parking to these secured access points (e.g., stalls 'near the main entrance' and 'next to secured entrance'). While not explicitly calling it 'gated parking,' the combination of remarks and an MLS SECENT flag suggests parking is within a secured-access area.

Parking is consistently described as a single stall or space per unit without any reference to tandem or back-to-back layouts. The complete absence of TANDEM in MLS records supports that tandem parking is not offered here.

The building is characterized as a boutique condo with self-park covered stalls and guest stalls, but no listings reference any valet or attended parking. With MLS also never marking VALET, it is safe to conclude valet parking is not provided.

The remarks generally describe assigned or included covered parking and guest stalls. No parking availability-control system or waitlist was mentioned.

Remarks highlight convenience of elevators ('one covered parking stall located close to elevators') but do not describe them as keyed, fob-access, or restricted. Given the detailed mention of other security features without any elevator-security language, keyed elevator access is unlikely.

General secured entry is referenced in several listings, along with video surveillance. No specific card- or fob-based access system is identified.

No remarks reference a security guard, 24-hour security, or on-site security staff, even when agents highlight other building features. With 0/13 MLS entries marking a guard and no textual evidence, this building is very likely not staffed by a security guard service.

The listings mention a resident manager, secured entry, and video surveillance, none of which establishes a security patrol service. No direct patrol evidence was found.

At least two listings describe the building as having 'secured entrance, video surveillance' or 'secured entry, video surveillance,' directly confirming video security. Other agents reference a 'secure building,' supporting that some form of camera-based security is in place.

0 of 13 listings indicate central A/C in MLS checkboxes, and no public remarks reference central air, HVAC, or forced-air systems. Instead, agents highlight natural ventilation (trade winds, cooler side of building, open-air hallways), strongly suggesting there is no central air conditioning system in the building.

1 of 13 listings has the split A/C inclusion box checked, and no remarks say the building prohibits or entirely lacks A/C systems. Although no remarks explicitly tout mini-splits, this MLS evidence suggests at least one unit has a split system, so the building is treated as offering split A/C in some units.

Eight of 20 current listings report ACWIUN in the MLS inclusions, supporting that at least some units may have window or wall air conditioning. No listing explicitly says "window AC," "window air conditioner," or "window unit," and only one mentions an "updated AC system," so the evidence is primarily checkbox-based rather than confirmed across multiple agent remarks.

All 20 listings identify CONCRE in the construction materials field. No public remarks explicitly state 'concrete construction,' but the consistent designation across the entire listing set provides very strong building-level evidence.

Only 2/15 current MLS listings include DOUWAL and none of the public remarks mention 'double wall' (no quotes). This is weak and inconsistent evidence (may be agent checkbox error), so the building is marked as possibly having double-wall construction but with low confidence.

Across all listings there is no MLS or remarks evidence of hollow tile construction. Agents consistently only indicate concrete, so hollow tile is very unlikely as a primary construction type.

Masonry/stucco construction is not supported: only 1/20 listings checks MASSTU, and none of the remarks mention "masonry" or "stucco." The isolated checkbox conflicts with the building's prior high-confidence absence and appears more likely to be copy-paste or agent error.

There is no remark-based support for steel frame construction in any of the provided listings. Given the strong and repeated concrete classification in the MLS history, the steel-frame checkbox appears to be a likely data entry or copy/paste issue rather than a true building feature.

Only 2 of 20 listings mention SLAB in MLS data, and no public remarks describe a concrete slab or solid concrete foundation. Historical data consistently supported the absence of slab construction, so the limited current checkbox evidence is insufficient to include this feature.

No analysis available

No listing selects wood frame in MLS, and remarks consistently describe a multi-story concrete-style tower rather than a low-rise wood building. Given the building height and location, primary wood-frame construction would be highly unlikely.

Above-ground construction is supported by 8/20 current MLS listings and by repeated references to high-floor units, including the 9th, 11th, 14th, and 17th floors. No public remark explicitly uses the phrase "above ground," so confidence is moderate rather than definitive.

No agent marks brick construction in MLS, and none of the public remarks mention brick facades or brick-and-mortar construction. The style and location strongly match concrete high-rise condos, not brick buildings.

No listing indicates single-wall construction and none of the narratives reference it; instead, they describe a multi-story condo with elevators and concrete-like characteristics. Given the building form, single-wall construction can be confidently excluded.

The building permits longer-term or mid-term rentals but imposes a 30-day minimum. Under the stated rules, this means short-term rental is not allowed.

The remarks describe a residential condo with a 30-day minimum rental rule and provide no evidence of hotel pool participation. Because STR is not allowed, hotel rental pool participation must also be false.

The public remarks do not describe any hotel rental program or mandatory participation requirement. Since the building does not permit short-term rentals, mandatory hotel pool participation is false.

Two of the 13 listings clearly advertise 'Fee Simple' ownership at Crescent Park. Other listings don’t contradict this, indicating the building includes both fee simple and leasehold units.

At least six of the 13 listings are clearly leasehold, using terms like 'LEASEHOLD Property,' 'leasehold boutique condo,' and 'Leasehold land tenure until 2046' with stated lease rents. The building therefore has both leasehold and fee simple units; among explicit mentions, at least 6 listings are LH and 2 are FS, with one lease reported expiring in 2046.

Several remarks identify the property as leasehold and consistently provide 2046 as the lease expiration year. Although some listings describe fee-simple units, the most specific and repeated leasehold statements support 2046.

The remarks discuss conventional financing and seller financing but do not mention VA financing or VA approval. Based on the available public remarks, VA financing cannot be confirmed.

I searched for explicit HOA insurance language, including "fully insured," "full insurance," "comprehensive building insurance," and "walls-in coverage." No such statements appear in the remarks, so this is recorded as false with medium-low confidence based on the absence of evidence.

Across 13 listings, agents repeatedly highlight building features such as pool, BBQ, security, and resident manager, but none mention fire sprinklers or a sprinkler system, and 12/13 listings do not check the sprinkler amenity. This pattern strongly indicates the building is not fully sprinklered and that the lone checkbox is inaccurate.

I searched the remarks for statements indicating that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or fire inspection. Nothing relevant was found, so this is recorded as false with medium-low confidence based on the absence of evidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly supported across the building, with 13 of 20 current listings marked OCEAN and numerous independent remarks explicitly mentioning ocean or water views. Repeated phrases such as "ocean views," "ocean breeze," and "peekaboo ocean view" indicate this is a legitimate building-level feature rather than a single copied description.

Mountain views are strongly supported across multiple listings, including phrases such as "Gorgeous Views of Diamond Head, Koolau Mountains," "Ocean, City, Mountain and Diamond Head views," and "mountain (Mauka) and Diamond Head views." The evidence appears across numerous distinct remarks and confirms the current MLS data, with 15 of 20 listings marked MOUNTA.

Diamond Head views are among the strongest-supported features, appearing in 17 of 20 current MLS listings and repeatedly confirmed in detailed remarks from multiple listings. Key descriptions include "best unobstructed views EVER of Diamond Head," "Gorgeous Views of Diamond Head," and "stunning views of Diamond Head," demonstrating broad and consistent support.

City views are well supported by multiple listings, including "city views," "Waikiki skyline," and "stunning views of Diamond Head and the surrounding city." The repeated references across different remarks align with 14 of 20 current listings marked CITY and indicate a genuine building-level offering.

Remarks emphasize coastal living, ocean proximity, and 'coastal' lifestyle (e.g., 'coastal living', 'steps from the Beach'), and COASTL appears in some MLS entries. Although explicit 'coastline' wording is less frequent, the repeated ocean/coastal context implies coastline-view units exist.

Several remarks highlight views of Kapiolani Park and "Park, Zoo" across the street, which are effectively landscaped/garden-type outlooks. Coupled with one MLS listing checking GARDEN, this supports that some units have garden/park views.

Golf-course views are confirmed in at least one detailed current remark: "Enjoy the views of ... Ala Wai Golf Course ... and the Waikiki Skyline." Although less frequent than mountain or city views, the explicit reference plus 5 of 20 MLS GOLCOU entries supports including this building feature.

Marina-related views have weak support: 4 of 20 current listings carry the MARCAN code, but none of the supplied remarks explicitly say "marina," "harbor," or "canal." This may reflect copied MLS checkbox data, so the feature should be treated as unconfirmed pending a direct remark or site verification.

Sunrise views are strongly supported across multiple listings, with phrases such as "Diamond Head, ocean, and sunrise views," "enjoy ... gorgeous sunset and sunrise views," and "Watch sunrise over Diamond Head." The evidence is repeated across distinct remarks and aligns with 12 of 20 current listings marked SUNRIS.

Sunset views are less frequently noted but do appear: 1 of 16 current listings flags sunset and several remarks explicitly say "gorgeous sunset and sunrise views" and "enjoy... gorgeous sunset and sunrise views." While less common than other view types, multiple remarks confirm that some units have sunset/western exposures.

Across all remarks, views are of Diamond Head, ocean, park, zoo, golf course, and city, with no hint of a cemetery. The complete absence of CEMETA in 13 MLS records and the described neighborhood context make cemetery views highly unlikely.

The remarks mention ocean, Diamond Head, park, mountain, city, sunrise, and sunset views. They do not establish a fireworks view from the units.

No analysis available

Remarks clearly indicate pets are permitted in some form, with explicit 'Comfort pets OK' and repeated invitations to 'Inquire...if you have a pet.' No listing states 'no pets', so the building should be treated as pets allowed, likely with restrictions/approval.

The feature is strongly supported across the listing history and current data. At least 6 listings explicitly mention phrases such as "resident manager," "on site resident manager," and "On-site resident manager," while the current MLS amenity is marked in 20/20 listings, indicating a consistent building-level feature rather than an isolated copy-paste entry.

The building is zoned Resort and allows 30+ day rentals, supporting medium-term vacation use but not nightly hotel operations. The absence of any hotel-related services or 'condotel' language across 13 listings strongly indicates it is not a condotel.

None of the 20 listings explicitly mention cooperative ownership, co-op status, or shares; instead, multiple listings call Crescent Park a “condo,” “fee simple condo,” or “leasehold” property. The isolated COOTAX entry appears to be an MLS data-entry error or copied checkbox and is not supported by the remarks.