Crescent Park

All available MLS property records for this building agree on a 1970 construction year. No remarks indicate a different build year or complete rebuild.

Listings repeatedly reference a '17th Floor' unit and property data confirms units up to floor 17. No listing mentions any higher floors or penthouse level, so the building is treated as 17 stories tall.

At least one listing describes Crescent Park as 'a boutique building with only 62 units total.' No alternate unit totals are mentioned across the other remarks, so 62 units is adopted.

Kept the existing owner-occupancy value of 40.00% because the public remarks do not state any percentage or clearly describe owner vs. renter mix. I searched for phrases like 'owner occupied', 'owner-occupied', '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied' and similar, and found none, so the current numeric value is retained with low confidence.

Kept existing value of 2 elevators because no remark gives a numeric count. I searched for explicit phrases like '2 elevators', 'two elevators', 'four elevators' and similar — none were found. Remarks do reference 'Elevators...' but not a count, so current numeric value is retained with low confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

No listings indicate central AC in the HOA inclusions, and none of the public remarks reference central air or AC as an included utility. The building is repeatedly marketed as naturally cooled by trade winds, so central AC being included in fees is very unlikely.

9 of 13 recent listings check the MLS box indicating cable TV is included in the association fee. Although remarks do not explicitly mention cable, the consistent checkbox use across multiple agents strongly implies cable service is included in the maintenance fees.

MLS checkbox OTCOEX appears in 12 of 15 current listings and historical review rated this as High confidence. Although none of the public remarks explicitly say 'common area electricity,' many listings reference upgraded common areas and building maintenance; the repeated MLS coding across multiple agents suggests this is a building-level included expense rather than a one-off entry.

No listing indicates co-op taxes in the fee inclusions, and the building is consistently described as a condo, not a co-op. This makes it virtually certain that cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fees.

None of the recent listings check the MLS box for electricity included in HOA fees. Given the lack of any remark mentioning power included, it is very likely that unit electricity is billed separately and not part of the maintenance fee.

No listing shows gas in the association fee inclusions, and there is no mention of gas appliances or gas utilities in the remarks. This strongly indicates that gas is not included in the maintenance fees (and may not be present at all).

Only 1 of 15 current MLS listings includes HOTWAT, while 14 of 15 explicitly list WTRHTR (water heater) as an in-unit inclusion. Public remarks repeatedly mention washer/dryer and in-unit amenities but not building-supplied hot water; the presence of in-unit water heaters across almost all listings provides strong evidence that hot water is not included in the association fee.

12 of 15 MLS listings include INTSER (internet service) as an association fee item, but public remarks are silent on internet/wifi. The repeated MLS coding across many listings implies the HOA likely provides internet service to units/common areas, though the evidence is implied rather than explicitly described in agent remarks.

None of the listings indicate marina fees or access as part of the HOA, and the remarks focus on proximity to beach, park, and zoo rather than any boating facility. This makes it virtually certain that marina costs are not included in the maintenance fees.

All 15 current MLS listings include SEWER as part of the association fee and previous reviews rated this as High confidence. Public remarks do not mention separate sewer fees or metering; the uniform MLS coding from multiple agents supports that sewer is included in HOA fees.

Water is coded as included in 15 of 15 current MLS listings with prior High confidence. None of the public remarks describe separate water metering or extra water fees, and the consistent MLS entries across listings indicate water is an association-covered expense.

All 15 of 15 current listings include BBQ in the amenities and numerous remarks explicitly mention a shared BBQ/grill (e.g., 'Pool and BBQ area recently upgraded', 'swimming pool, BBQ area', 'grill amenities'). The evidence is strong and consistent across many agent remarks, indicating a building-level BBQ/common grilling facility.

Public remarks in multiple listings clearly state 'Surfboard and bike storage available for small monthly cost,' directly confirming on-site bicycle storage. The same amenity is described consistently across more than one listing, indicating a real building feature rather than a copy/paste mistake. Even though agents are not checking the bike-storage box, the written remarks provide high-confidence evidence that bike storage exists.

Listings emphasize beach and park access but never mention boat slips, docks, or marina facilities. Given the location context and MLS data, the building clearly does not have a boat dock or marina access.

No public remarks mention any car wash or vehicle wash area, while only 3 of 15 MLS records show the car-wash checkbox. Given the historical high confidence that the building lacks a car wash and the absence of any descriptive remarks, the car wash feature is very likely not present (agent checkbox inconsistency suspected).

The building is repeatedly described as a “boutique” condo with limited amenities, and no listing mentions any clubhouse or community center. MLS data also omits this amenity entirely, supporting that a clubhouse is not present.

No remarks use the words 'concierge' or 'front desk,' even where building operations are discussed. The presence of a resident manager without any concierge-related language suggests there is management but not a true concierge service.

Remarks note pet policies only in terms of asking the listing agent, without describing any on-site pet or dog park facilities. With no text or MLS support for such an amenity, the building does not appear to have a dog park.

Agents consistently refer to an 'on-site resident manager' but never to a doorman or lobby attendant, which would normally be a strong selling point if present. The combination of detailed remarks and unchecked MLS data strongly indicates there is no doorman service.

Across 13 listings, none of the remarks reference a gym, fitness center, or exercise room. The MLS amenities checkbox for exercise room is never selected, and amenity descriptions are consistent and limited to pool and BBQ, indicating the building does not offer a fitness facility.

The building is described as a boutique condo with modest amenities, not as a full-service luxury tower. With no mention of complimentary car or limo services, this amenity can be safely ruled out.

Amenity lists focus on pool, BBQ, resident manager, security, and storage, with no indication of any formal meeting or conference space. The consistent omission in both remarks and MLS suggests the building does not offer a meeting room.

At least 8 of 13 listings mention lanais (wrap-around, open, and enclosed) as major features of the units. Phrases like '300 sq ft wrap-around lanai' and 'large enclosed lanai' show that patio/deck-style outdoor spaces are typical in this building, not a one-off penthouse feature.

The area offers outdoor recreation, but there is no explicit mention of a jogging or walking path within the building’s grounds. MLS data also omits this feature, so the building is not represented as having its own jogging path.

Family-friendly attractions like the park and zoo are emphasized, but no common-area play structure or kids’ playground is described within the building. The consistent MLS and remarks pattern indicates there is no playground amenity.

Across all remarks the outdoor references are only to lanais, the pool, BBQ area, and nearby Kapiolani Park or the beach. The building is an older boutique high-rise in Waikiki, making private yards for units highly unlikely.

Amenity descriptions are brief and consistent and never include any golf or putting facilities. Given the building’s small, boutique profile and lack of MLS indication, a putting green is very unlikely to exist.

Amenities are described specifically as an outdoor pool and BBQ area rather than a general recreation deck or rec area. With no explicit references and no MLS support, the building is unlikely to have a separate recreation area beyond the pool/BBQ space.

Agents consistently list amenities as pool, BBQ area, resident manager, security, and storage, with no reference to a rec room or game room. The absence from both remarks and MLS checkboxes indicates there is no dedicated recreation room.

Dining options are clearly off-site in the surrounding Waikiki area. The absence of any on-premises restaurant in multiple descriptions and MLS confirms the building does not include its own restaurant.

Agents highlight views from lanais and units but never reference a shared rooftop terrace or deck. The lack of mention across many listings and the absence from MLS amenities indicate there are no rooftop amenities.

Amenity descriptions are consistent and limited to pool, BBQ, resident manager, security, and storage. The total absence of any reference to a sauna supports that the building does not have this feature.

Multiple listings describe 'Surfboard and bike storage available for small monthly cost,' showing the building offers dedicated storage areas beyond the unit. This phrasing appears in at least two separate listings, suggesting a stable building amenity rather than a one-off agent error. Although only 1/13 MLS entries mark storage in amenities, the repeated remarks provide stronger evidence that storage units/lockers are available.

Several public remarks explicitly confirm surfboard storage availability (often paired with bike storage) and indicate a small monthly fee. This is direct, repeated mention across listings and supports a high-confidence true value.

Remarks repeatedly highlight proximity to Kapiolani Park’s tennis courts, but never describe any on-site tennis facility. Combined with the MLS showing no tennis court amenity, this strongly indicates the building does not have its own tennis court.

Ten of 15 MLS listings include the trash chute amenity and multiple remarks explicitly reference a trash chute (e.g., 'Elevators and trash chute are just a few steps from your front door'). The presence is confirmed across several agent remarks and is consistent with prior high-confidence records.

Parking is consistently described as assigned covered stalls plus a few guest stalls, with no reference to any staffed parking services. Given 13 detailed listings and no mention of valet, the building very likely does not offer valet service.

Remarks talk about 'covered ground-level parking near the main entrance' and 'four guest stalls' but never mention a gate, perimeter wall, or fenced enclosure. Given the urban Waikiki setting and lack of any 'gated' or 'fenced' language, the building likely does not have wall or fence perimeter security.

The whirlpool reference applies to a private bathtub within a unit rather than a common-area spa amenity. Since MLS amenities and other listings do not describe any shared whirlpool or hot tub, the building does not offer a whirlpool facility.

All 15 current listings reference a building swimming pool (phrases include 'Pool and BBQ area recently upgraded', 'swimming pool', 'tiled swimming pool and bbq area', and 'outdoor pool'). Mentions appear across many independent remarks/agents and consistently describe a shared amenity, providing strong corroboration that the building has a pool.

Although many listings mention a 'pool', 'swimming pool', or 'outdoor pool', none describe it as 'heated' and no MLS records select any heated-pool feature. This consistent omission across all available data supports the conclusion that the building’s pool is not heated.

I searched for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline pool' and similar terms and found none. The building has a swimming pool (confirmed), but no evidence indicates it is a saltwater pool.

Strong, consistent evidence that some units have in-unit laundry: 15 of 15 current MLS listings and multiple public remarks explicitly state "washer/dryer in the unit", "Wash & Dryer in Unit", or "Full sized washer and dryer". The mentions appear across many listings/agents (possible copy‑paste), but the uniformity and historical high-confidence MLS checkbox support setting laundry_in_unit = true with high confidence.

Across all provided listings, building amenities are described repeatedly, but there is no mention of shared or community laundry despite consistent mention of other amenities. Combined with 0/13 MLS amenities for community laundry and repeated emphasis on in‑unit washers/dryers, the evidence suggests the building does not have separate community laundry facilities.

I looked for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'card operated', or 'paid laundry' and found none. Remarks focus on in-unit washers/dryers and an exclusive laundry room for a unit, with no evidence that any community laundry (if present) is paid.

I searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found none. Multiple remarks instead reference washer/dryer in-unit or an exclusive laundry room for a unit, indicating no evidence of community laundry on every floor.

The building clearly provides parking, with nearly every listing describing a dedicated stall or space. Phrases like '1 assigned garaged parking' and 'one covered parking stall' appear across multiple agents’ remarks, aligning with 13/13 MLS records showing parking features selected.

Assigned parking is regularly mentioned across listings (historical MLS: 11/15 listings flagged ASSIGN). Remarks include explicit phrases such as 'One assigned covered parking stall' and '1 assigned garaged parking', showing multiple agents reference reserved stalls rather than a one-off note.

Covered parking is strongly supported (historical MLS: 14/15 listings flagged covered/garage). Numerous remarks state 'one covered parking stall', 'covered ground-level parking near the main entrance', or '1 covered parking stall', indicating covered/garage-type stalls are a consistent building feature.

I searched for explicit language such as 'deeded parking' or 'owned parking' but found none. Listings consistently describe an assigned/covered stall included with units, but there is no statement that the stall is deeded, so parking_deeded is set to false with low confidence.

There is no reference to EV or charging stations in any of the marketing remarks, even where other amenities are carefully listed. Combined with 0/13 MLS checkboxes for EV charging, this strongly indicates the building does not currently offer EV parking or chargers.

I searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', and similar phrases but found no clear monthly parking charge in the remarks. Because there is no explicit parking fee amount or statement, parking_fee is unknown (null) with low confidence.

Guest parking is mentioned in several listings (historical MLS: 7/15 listings flagged GUEST). Current public remarks include statements like 'guest parking', 'four guest stalls', and 'Two guest stalls at the top of the ramp,' indicating designated visitor parking exists in the building.

Listings emphasize building security with comments like 'secured entry' and 'video surveillance,' and tie parking to these secured access points (e.g., stalls 'near the main entrance' and 'next to secured entrance'). While not explicitly calling it 'gated parking,' the combination of remarks and an MLS SECENT flag suggests parking is within a secured-access area.

Parking is consistently described as a single stall or space per unit without any reference to tandem or back-to-back layouts. The complete absence of TANDEM in MLS records supports that tandem parking is not offered here.

The building is characterized as a boutique condo with self-park covered stalls and guest stalls, but no listings reference any valet or attended parking. With MLS also never marking VALET, it is safe to conclude valet parking is not provided.

I searched the remarks for indications of a parking waitlist or procedures to join one and found nothing. Listings describe assigned stalls and guest stalls but give no waitlist info, so parking_waitlist is set to false with low confidence.

Remarks highlight convenience of elevators ('one covered parking stall located close to elevators') but do not describe them as keyed, fob-access, or restricted. Given the detailed mention of other security features without any elevator-security language, keyed elevator access is unlikely.

I searched for 'key card', 'fob access', 'card reader', and 'electronic access' and found no mentions. While the building advertises secured entry and video surveillance, there is no explicit evidence of card/fob access.

No remarks reference a security guard, 24-hour security, or on-site security staff, even when agents highlight other building features. With 0/13 MLS entries marking a guard and no textual evidence, this building is very likely not staffed by a security guard service.

I searched for terms indicating a security patrol or roving service and found none. The building lists secured entry, video surveillance, and an on-site resident manager, but there is no evidence of a security patrol service.

At least two listings describe the building as having 'secured entrance, video surveillance' or 'secured entry, video surveillance,' directly confirming video security. Other agents reference a 'secure building,' supporting that some form of camera-based security is in place.

0 of 13 listings indicate central A/C in MLS checkboxes, and no public remarks reference central air, HVAC, or forced-air systems. Instead, agents highlight natural ventilation (trade winds, cooler side of building, open-air hallways), strongly suggesting there is no central air conditioning system in the building.

1 of 13 listings has the split A/C inclusion box checked, and no remarks say the building prohibits or entirely lacks A/C systems. Although no remarks explicitly tout mini-splits, this MLS evidence suggests at least one unit has a split system, so the building is treated as offering split A/C in some units.

3 of 13 listings check a window A/C inclusion, and none of the remarks contradict this by claiming there is no A/C or that it is prohibited. Given multiple agents flagging window units, it is likely that at least some units have window A/C, so the building is considered to offer this feature.

All 15 of 15 current MLS listings list construction_materials=CONCRE (historically all listings did as well). Remarks do not explicitly say 'concrete' but there is no contradictory information and the checkbox data is consistent across all agents, so concrete construction is very well supported.

Only 2/15 current MLS listings include DOUWAL and none of the public remarks mention 'double wall' (no quotes). This is weak and inconsistent evidence (may be agent checkbox error), so the building is marked as possibly having double-wall construction but with low confidence.

Across all listings there is no MLS or remarks evidence of hollow tile construction. Agents consistently only indicate concrete, so hollow tile is very unlikely as a primary construction type.

The MLS data never flags masonry/stucco for this building, and public remarks describe it as a typical older Waikiki condo tower rather than a masonry-stucco low- or mid-rise. This makes masonry/stucco construction highly unlikely as a primary type.

MLS data never indicates steel frame for this building, while all records consistently mark concrete construction instead. In the absence of any mention of steel framing across many agents, steel-frame construction can be ruled out with high confidence.

There is no MLS evidence of slab construction for this building, and agents consistently choose other construction types (concrete, sometimes above-ground) instead. Given this consistent omission across many listings, slab construction is unlikely to be the designated type here.

No analysis available

No listing selects wood frame in MLS, and remarks consistently describe a multi-story concrete-style tower rather than a low-rise wood building. Given the building height and location, primary wood-frame construction would be highly unlikely.

Several listings (5 of 13) explicitly flag above-ground construction (ABOGRO) in MLS, and descriptions of covered ground-level parking with residential units above fit this classification. No remarks contradict this, so above-ground construction is supported with moderate confidence.

No agent marks brick construction in MLS, and none of the public remarks mention brick facades or brick-and-mortar construction. The style and location strongly match concrete high-rise condos, not brick buildings.

No listing indicates single-wall construction and none of the narratives reference it; instead, they describe a multi-story condo with elevators and concrete-like characteristics. Given the building form, single-wall construction can be confidently excluded.

Multiple public remarks explicitly require minimum 30-day rentals and explicitly exclude nightly/weekly rentals, indicating short-term (nightly/weekly) rentals are not permitted. Therefore str_allowed is false with high confidence.

There is no evidence of any hotel rental pool program in the remarks, and because short-term (nightly/weekly) rentals are expressly disallowed, the building cannot participate in a hotel rental pool. Set to false with high confidence.

No listing states a mandatory rental pool or that owners must participate in a hotel program. With STRs disallowed and no program evidence, str_mandatory_pool is false with high confidence.

Two of the 13 listings clearly advertise 'Fee Simple' ownership at Crescent Park. Other listings don’t contradict this, indicating the building includes both fee simple and leasehold units.

At least six of the 13 listings are clearly leasehold, using terms like 'LEASEHOLD Property,' 'leasehold boutique condo,' and 'Leasehold land tenure until 2046' with stated lease rents. The building therefore has both leasehold and fee simple units; among explicit mentions, at least 6 listings are LH and 2 are FS, with one lease reported expiring in 2046.

Multiple listings identify the property as leasehold and one explicitly gives the lease expiry year as 2046. No remarks mention any renewal or later extension, so 2046 is taken as the lease expiry year with high confidence.

I searched all remarks for terms like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and 'VA loans accepted' and found none. No remarks indicate VA loan approval for this building. Given the absence of any VA-related language, we mark financing_va as false with low confidence.

No listing remarks indicate the HOA provides full (walls-in) building insurance coverage. I searched for phrases like 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'comprehensive building insurance', and 'full insurance' and found none, so the feature is set to false with low confidence.

Across 13 listings, agents repeatedly highlight building features such as pool, BBQ, security, and resident manager, but none mention fire sprinklers or a sprinkler system, and 12/13 listings do not check the sprinkler amenity. This pattern strongly indicates the building is not fully sprinklered and that the lone checkbox is inaccurate.

There is no evidence in the public remarks that the building has passed a formal fire/life safety evaluation. I searched the remarks for 'fire life safety', 'FLSE', 'fire inspection passed', 'life safety compliant', and related terms and found nothing, so the feature is set to false with low confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Both historical data and several current remarks confirm ocean views. CURRENT MLS DATA lists OCEAN in 4/15 view_descriptions and agents' remarks include phrases like "Ocean views", "breathtaking Ocean", and "peekaboo ocean view," indicating multiple units offer ocean views.

Mountain (mauka/Koolau) views are consistently mentioned across listings. CURRENT MLS DATA records MOUNTA in 7/15 view_descriptions and agent remarks include direct references such as "Koolau Mountains" and "the mountain (Mauka)," supporting that some units have mountain views.

Diamond Head is a prominent selling point in multiple listings. CURRENT MLS DATA lists DIAHEA in 6/15 view_descriptions and numerous remarks state "Diamond Head" or "Watch sunrise over Diamond Head," indicating several units provide Diamond Head views.

City/skyline views are mentioned across multiple listings. CURRENT MLS DATA records CITY in 6/15 view_descriptions and agent remarks include "Waikiki skyline" and "city views," indicating the building offers city-view units.

While remarks talk about ocean and Diamond Head views rather than explicitly saying "coastline," 3/13 MLS listings tag COASTL as a view type. Given the building’s proximity to Waikiki Beach, it is plausible that some higher floors enjoy coastline views.

Several remarks highlight views of Kapiolani Park and "Park, Zoo" across the street, which are effectively landscaped/garden-type outlooks. Coupled with one MLS listing checking GARDEN, this supports that some units have garden/park views.

Ala Wai Golf Course view is mentioned but less frequently than other views. CURRENT MLS DATA lists GOLCOU in 1/15 view_descriptions and one agent remark explicitly states "Ala Wai Golf Course," indicating at least some units have golf course views though the evidence is limited to few listings.

No remarks explicitly say "canal" or "harbor" views, but 2/13 MLS records mark MARCAN, which typically denotes marina/canal views. Given the building’s Waikiki location and this repeated MLS tagging, it is likely that some higher-floor units have Ala Wai canal/marina-type views.

At least four remarks emphasize sunrise, such as "Enjoy the views of ... Sunrise," "gorgeous sunset and sunrise views," and "Watch sunrise over Diamond Head." With 4/13 MLS records marking SUNRIS, sunrise views are clearly available from some units.

Sunset views are called out in at least two listings with phrases like "Enjoy the views of ... Sunset" and "gorgeous sunset and sunrise views." Combined with an MLS checkbox for SUNSET, this indicates that some units face a sunset orientation.

Across all remarks, views are of Diamond Head, ocean, park, zoo, golf course, and city, with no hint of a cemetery. The complete absence of CEMETA in 13 MLS records and the described neighborhood context make cemetery views highly unlikely.

I searched for statements like 'fireworks view', 'see fireworks from', or 'watch fireworks from lanai' and found no matches. Although the building offers ocean, Diamond Head and event views, there is no explicit claim of fireworks being visible from units.

No analysis available

Remarks clearly indicate pets are permitted in some form, with explicit 'Comfort pets OK' and repeated invitations to 'Inquire...if you have a pet.' No listing states 'no pets', so the building should be treated as pets allowed, likely with restrictions/approval.

All 15 current listings include the RESMAN amenity and numerous remarks explicitly state an on-site resident manager (examples: 'on site resident manager', 'resident manager', 'building has an on-site resident manager'). The mentions appear across multiple agents/listings rather than isolated to a single listing, providing strong, consistent evidence the building has a resident manager on-site.

The building is zoned Resort and allows 30+ day rentals, supporting medium-term vacation use but not nightly hotel operations. The absence of any hotel-related services or 'condotel' language across 13 listings strongly indicates it is not a condotel.

The building is consistently marketed as a condominium, with standard condo financing, leasehold/fee simple tenure, and association amenities. There is no evidence of cooperative structure or CO-OP style ownership in any remarks.