
Craigside
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Craigside
Building Overview
Craigside in Nuuanu-Punchbowl (1981) — 9-floor concrete building with pool and fitness center.

About Craigside
According to available records, Craigside is a nine-floor residential building in the Nuuanu-Punchbowl neighborhood built in 1981. The structure is concrete construction and offers ocean, mountain and sunset views from various units.
Key on-site amenities include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, a resident manager and a security guard. Air conditioning reported in units is split and window-type systems.
Parking is available, covered and assigned, with guest parking provided. Pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. Management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules and fees with the listing agent or building management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks provide an explicit owner-occupancy figure of 73%, so that value should be used. This also matches the current building context, reinforcing the reading.
I searched the remarks for any direct elevator count, such as "2 elevators," "4 elevators," or similar wording, but none was stated. The remarks do mention elevator access in passing, including "close to the elevator" and "secure elevators," but that does not confirm the number of elevators in the building.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that cable is included. Several remarks explicitly mention cable service or a Spectrum cable/WiFi bundle, which aligns with the current MLS data showing CABTV in 15/20 listings. This appears to be consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent entry.
There is solid evidence that common-area electricity/common expenses are included. One remark lists 'HOA includes: Electricity, Sewer/Water, Hot Water, Spectrum Cable/Wifi Bundle... and Common Area Expenses,' and another mentions a separate 'Common Expense' line item. The pattern is consistent enough to support inclusion, though the wording is more indirect than water/sewer.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong evidence that hot water is included in the maintenance fee. Remarks explicitly say 'Maintenance fee includes your water, sewer and hot water' and 'hot water is already included,' which matches the high-frequency MLS signal (17/20 listings). There is no meaningful evidence of a building-level change away from this feature.
Internet inclusion is strongly supported by the remarks and MLS data. Multiple listings reference a cable/WiFi bundle or directly state 'Cable/internet,' and the current MLS records show INTSER in 16/20 listings. This looks like a consistent building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Sewer is very clearly included. The remarks repeatedly state 'water, sewer' together and one HOA breakdown explicitly lists 'Sewer/Water,' matching the high-confidence MLS pattern (17/20 listings). This is one of the strongest signals in the dataset.
Water inclusion is strongly and repeatedly confirmed. Several listings explicitly state that maintenance fees include water, and the MLS data also shows WATER in 16/20 listings. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listing descriptions.
BBQ facilities are clearly a shared building amenity. The remarks consistently call out "BBQ area," "BBQ areas," and "barbeques," appearing in many listings from multiple agents, which aligns with the MLS amenity data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities appear to be a genuine building amenity. The feature is directly called out in remarks as a "car wash area" and "car wash station," which is strong support for a shared facility.
Limited and inconsistent evidence: only a few MLS entries (about 3–4) have 'club house' checked and public remarks do not describe a clubhouse or community center. Because some MLS checkboxes indicate one may exist but agent remarks are silent, the feature is possible but not well supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is strongly supported across the building. Multiple remarks mention a "workout room," "gym," "fitness center," and "fitness room," with consistent language across many listings rather than a one-off agent note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence from many listings confirms patio/deck amenities for Craigside. Numerous remarks mention a "lanai," "covered lanai," "open lanai," "private balcony," "rec deck," or "private deck," and this appears consistently across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence does not support private yard availability: remarks repeatedly describe shared grounds, garden-like/parklike settings and lanais but contain no phrases like "private yard", "fenced yard" or "private outdoor space" for units. Although 1/20 MLS entries list PRIYAR, the public remarks across this corpus do not corroborate that feature, suggesting the amenity is not generally offered to units.
No analysis available
There is solid evidence for a shared recreation area. Remarks reference "recreation areas" and a "rec deck," which supports the MLS amenity and suggests it is a real common-area feature.
Moderate evidence: 7/20 MLS entries list a recreation room, and a few remarks reference 'recreation areas' or 'recreational area', but explicit phrasing 'recreation room' / 'rec room' is uncommon, so inclusion is based on some MLS checks and implied recreational indoor space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is clearly part of the building's amenity package. Numerous listings explicitly mention "sauna," often in the same amenity list as pools, BBQ areas, and fitness facilities.
Strong evidence across many listings: at least a dozen public remarks explicitly mention storage/lockers (phrases include "access to a large storage unit", "large/tall storage unit", "extra large storage locker", "extra large storage room", and "large storage about 10 ft high"). Historical MLS checkbox data also recorded storage in multiple listings (5/20 in amenities, 2/20 in unit_features). Mentions appear across different agents and multiple building sections (Craigside I/II/III), so the building-level feature is well supported and likely accurate.
There is repeated direct evidence that the building offers storage suitable for surfboards. One listing explicitly says the storage room can fit a surfboard, and another mentions a storage area that can fit a longboard, bicycles, and more.
Tennis courts are one of the most consistently documented amenities in the building. Many listings explicitly mention "tennis court(s)," including detailed references like a "full sized tennis court," indicating shared access rather than copy-paste error.
Trash chute is supported by the MLS amenity data, even if it is not frequently mentioned in public remarks. Because it is a common building-system feature and there is no contrary evidence, it should remain marked as present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/spa amenities are well supported. Many listings refer to "whirlpools," "jacuzzis," or a "whirlpool spa," and the wording is consistent across multiple remarks.
Pool is a confirmed building-level amenity at Craigside. Across the provided listings, the feature is mentioned in a large majority of remarks—most commonly as '2 swimming pools' or 'two pools,' with some listings adding details like whirlpools/jacuzzis or a pool and recreation deck. The repeated mentions from many different listings support this as a real shared amenity rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit salt-pool wording such as 'salt water pool' or 'saltwater pool.' The building has multiple pools and whirlpools, but the remarks do not identify them as salt water.
Strong building-level evidence supports in-unit laundry. Many current listings explicitly mention it across multiple units and agents, including quotes such as "full-sized front loading washer and dryer," "washer/dryer in unit," and "in unit washer and dryer." The repeated references across listings suggest this is a real and consistent feature rather than a copy-paste error.
There is no mention of shared or coin-operated laundry, laundry room, or community laundry in the public remarks across the listings; instead, listings repeatedly advertise in-unit machines. Although one MLS record shows a community laundry amenity flag, the lack of any remarks describing a laundry room or shared facilities across the portfolio indicates the community laundry flag is likely incorrect.
I looked for any indication that community laundry requires payment, including coin laundry, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. The public remarks repeatedly reference in-unit washer/dryer, but do not mention any paid shared laundry facilities.
I searched the public remarks for explicit references to community laundry being available on each floor, such as 'laundry on every floor' or 'laundry room on every floor.' The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer or laundry within the unit, which does not confirm a shared laundry room on every floor.
Parking is clearly present for Craigside. Across the remarks, many listings explicitly mention parking in multiple forms, including secured, assigned, covered, tandem, side-by-side, and garage parking, plus ample guest parking. The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to be reinforced by multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste description.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the remarks and aligns with the MLS history. Multiple listings explicitly mention "assigned parking," "secured assigned parking stall," "designated" parking, and several units include assigned stalls, indicating this is a real building-level feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error.
Covered parking is very strongly confirmed by both historical MLS data and current remarks. The listings repeatedly reference covered, secured, garage, tandem, and covered-stall parking, across many agents and units, so this appears to be a genuine building feature.
I looked for terms like deeded parking, owned parking, parking included in deed, and owned stall. The remarks repeatedly mention assigned, covered, secured, tandem, or included parking stalls, but nothing indicates the stalls are deeded with the units.
No analysis available
I searched for language indicating a separate monthly parking cost or parking rental fee. The remarks only describe parking as included, assigned, secured, or tandem, with no evidence of any extra parking charge.
Guest parking is clearly supported by the current remarks and historical MLS data. Numerous listings explicitly mention ample or plenty of guest parking, and one notes "over ten covered guest stalls," making this a strong building-level amenity.
Secured parking/entry is supported by moderate MLS data (SECENT on 10/20) and several remarks that explicitly mention security features: 'secured parking', 'secured assigned parking stall', 'in a secured garage', 'each floor having their own fob' and 24-hour security. The combined evidence indicates the parking/entry is secured for residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, join-the-waitlist language, or any stall allocation queue. The remarks instead mention ample guest parking and included/assigned stalls, but nothing about a waitlist.
No analysis available
The public remarks strongly support card/fob access security. The clearest evidence is the statement that each floor has its own fob, which indicates a key-fob controlled access system for the building.
Security is strongly supported across the remarks and historical MLS data. Multiple listings explicitly mention "24-hour security," "security guards," and a "secure" or "secured" building, indicating this is a consistent building-wide amenity rather than a one-off agent checkbox. The historical MLS pattern (19 of 20 listings) aligns with the current remarks, so confidence is very high.
I looked for patrol-related wording like 'security patrol,' 'roving security,' or 'patrolled building.' The remarks consistently mention 24-hour security, secured entry, and security guards, but that is not the same as a patrol service, so this feature is not confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current public remarks mention split/mini-split or split system air conditioning in at least 8–12 separate listings (examples include "split AC", "brand new split AC unit", "split system A/C's", and "split air-conditioning system"). Historical MLS inclusion (ACSPL) also indicated the feature in multiple listings (6/20), so combined evidence is strong that some units in the building have split AC systems.
Window AC is supported by the historical MLS data and reinforced by numerous current remarks. Several listings explicitly mention cooling equipment such as "window AC units," "new ACs," "new GE air conditioning units," and "powerful air conditioners," while others reference split AC in related units. The evidence appears broad across multiple listings and agents, not just a one-off copy-paste note.
Strong building-level evidence supports concrete construction. Historically, all 20 MLS listings listed CONCRE, and the current data still shows 16/20 listings with CONCRE in construction_materials, which is consistent across many agents and listing periods. The public remarks do not explicitly say 'concrete,' but they also do not suggest any change, so the concrete construction feature remains highly reliable.
Moderate evidence: 9/20 MLS listings have DOUWAL checked, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' The feature may apply to some units/buildings but appears inconsistently recorded and could be due to agent copy/paste; include with moderate confidence for buyers searching for buildings that offer it.
No analysis available
Mixed evidence: 7 of 20 MLS entries list 'MASSTU' as a construction material, but no public remarks explicitly state 'stucco' or 'masonry' and much of the remarks appear copy-pasted across many units. This yields limited/uncertain support for masonry/stucco—possible but not strongly corroborated by remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Some evidence but uncertain: historically this feature was recorded with high confidence, but only 3/20 current MLS listings show ABOGRO and no remarks explicitly state 'above ground construction.' The building is repeatedly described as multi-story towers/high-rise, which implies above-ground construction; included with moderate confidence pending stronger explicit remarks or verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR-related terms such as short-term rental allowed, TVU, NUC, vacation rental, or minimum-stay rules. The public remarks contain no such references, so there is no evidence that STRs are allowed.
I looked for hotel pool references such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, hotel rental program, or managed-by-hotel language. None appear in the remarks, and there is no evidence the building participates in a hotel rental pool.
I searched for language indicating a required hotel or rental pool program, including must-participate or cannot-opt-out wording. The remarks do not mention any rental pool at all, so there is no basis for a mandatory pool classification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is identified as leasehold, and the expiration year is clearly given as 2046. I used the most specific year mentioned in the remarks.
The remarks directly confirm VA approval for the building, which supports VA financing eligibility. This is an explicit public remark, so confidence is very high.
The public remarks explicitly and repeatedly state that the building is fully insured. This is strong, direct evidence for full HOA/walls-in insurance coverage.
Fire sprinklers are strongly supported across the building: the historical MLS data showed 14/20 listings with FIRSPR, and multiple current remarks explicitly mention them. At least 3-4 listings say the building is "equipped with fire sprinklers" or has a "fire sprinkler system throughout the individual units and common areas," which looks like consistent building-level information rather than a one-off agent error.
I looked for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, such as FLSE passed, life safety compliant, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection. The remarks only mention fire sprinklers and sprinklered common areas/units, which is helpful but not the same as an explicit FLSE pass, so this feature is treated as not confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across many listings and multiple agents. At least 8+ remarks explicitly mention ocean or water views, including phrases like "ocean and city views," "panoramic ocean, mountain and city views," and "looks down Nuuanu towards the ocean." The pattern is consistent with the historical MLS data, so this appears to be a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
Very strong evidence the building offers mountain views: 12 of 20 current listings include mountain in the view field, and many remarks explicitly describe 'mountain views' or 'views of the Koolau mountains.' The consistency across listings suggests this is a real building feature, not MLS copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
City views are clearly available in Craigside and are mentioned across many listings. Multiple remarks independently reference "city views," "downtown Honolulu," "open city views," and "city lights below," showing this is not an isolated or agent-specific claim. The historical MLS data also strongly supports this feature, so confidence is very high.
Some units in the building offer coastline/ocean views: only 1 of 20 listings is coded COASTL in the current MLS but several public remarks across listings explicitly mention 'ocean', 'ocean and city views', or 'panoramic ocean', indicating coastline-view units exist though the feature is less widely represented than mountain or city views.
Garden-related views are supported by several listings, including explicit phrases like 'garden and treetop views' and 'tropical garden view from both the lanai and kitchen.' The surrounding grounds are also described as landscaped and garden-like, which reinforces that some units do offer this view type.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited but nonzero MLS evidence for sunrise exposure: 3 of 20 current listings include SUNRIS in the view descriptions. However, the public remarks do not clearly say 'sunrise view' or 'eastern exposure,' so this is a weaker, MLS-driven inference rather than a strongly verified feature.
Sunset views are supported for Craigside. One current remark explicitly states "the city, ocean, and sunset" views, and the MLS history already had 4/20 listings using SUNSET in the view descriptions while 5/20 showed NONE. Overall, the evidence is consistent enough to keep this as a building feature, though it appears on some units rather than all.
No analysis available
I searched for wording like 'fireworks view,' 'watch fireworks from the lanai,' or 'see fireworks from the unit.' The remarks mention ocean, city, mountain, and sunset views, but nothing about viewing fireworks from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is very strong building-level evidence for an on-site resident manager. Several listings explicitly say 'resident manager on site,' 'resident manager,' or 'site manager,' and the current MLS data shows RESMAN in 20/20 listings. The consistency across remarks suggests this is not copy-paste error but a true shared building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.