Courtyards at Punahou
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Courtyards at Punahou
Building Overview
Courtyards at Punahou in McCully-Moiliili — 20-floor concrete building (1993) with a pool and fitness center.
About Courtyards at Punahou
Courtyards at Punahou is a residential building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. According to available records, the tower was built in 1993, rises 20 floors, contains 40 total units and is of concrete construction.
The building's listed amenities include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area and a resident manager. Units are served by central air conditioning.
Parking is available with covered, assigned stalls. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers and agents should verify all building details, rules and fees with the seller or managing agent prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked the remarks for owner-occupancy indicators, including percentages and descriptive phrases, but found no explicit data. The building is described as low-density and private, but that does not establish owner-occupancy percentage.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts such as "4 elevators" or "multiple elevators" and did not find a number. The listings do consistently describe direct elevator entry/private elevator access, so elevator presence is clear, but the total count is not stated.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV is supported by the MLS across nearly all current listings (9/10 marked CABTV). None of the public remarks explicitly discuss cable, so this appears to be a stable building-level inclusion rather than something described by agents in remarks. Confidence is high because the MLS data is overwhelmingly consistent.
Common area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fees based on 8/10 current MLS listings marked OTCOEX. Public remarks do not spell it out, so this is driven primarily by the repeated MLS data rather than text descriptions. The evidence is moderately strong and consistent across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water should not be treated as included in the association fee. No current MLS listing marks HOTWAT, while 5/10 list WTRHTR in inclusions, which strongly points toward unit-level water heaters instead of building-supplied hot water. Public remarks are silent on this feature, so the MLS evidence supports a correction to false.
4/9 MLS listings mark internet as included in association fees; none of the public remarks mention internet or wifi being included. This is modest MLS-based evidence that some units/building listings list internet as included, but it is not confirmed in agent remarks.
No analysis available
Sewer is included in the maintenance fees based on unanimous current MLS evidence (10/10 listings marked SEWER). None of the public remarks contradict this, and the consistency suggests this is a stable building feature rather than copy-paste noise. Confidence is very high.
Water is included in the maintenance fees according to all current MLS listings (10/10 marked WATER). The public remarks do not explicitly repeat this, but there is no contrary evidence and the MLS pattern is unanimous. Confidence is very high.
BBQ is confirmed in the remarks with the phrase "pool and barbecue pavilion." This is a clear shared-amenity description, not a unit-only feature, and it appears alongside other building amenities in the same listing remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no public-remark evidence of any car wash facility. The remarks instead emphasize parking stalls and storage, so the MLS car-wash checkbox appears unsubstantiated by the listings provided.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox appears in only 1 of 9 listings, while 0 of 9 public remark sections mention concierge, concierge service, or a staffed front desk—several listings instead reference '24-hour security.' Given the low/absent historical confidence and no supporting remarks across multiple agents, the building likely does not offer concierge service; the single checked amenity appears to be a checkbox error or copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current remarks describe an exercise room, fitness center, gym, or workout room. The building remarks repeatedly focus on privacy, parking, views, and private elevator access, which makes the MLS checkbox look like a likely copy-paste error rather than a verified shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports patio/deck access at this building. Multiple current listings mention outdoor spaces in several forms—"open lanai," "large lanais," "four lanais," and a "spacious rooftop retreat"—across multiple remarks, not just one agent's copy. This aligns with the historical MLS pattern showing patio/deck amenities on all listed records.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of nine MLS listings list a recreation area, but none of the public remarks (0 of 9) explicitly describe a recreation area, recreation deck, or amenity deck—remarks use only generic 'amenities' language, so evidence is weak.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported for this building. Public remarks mention it in multiple separate listings, including "large personal storage room" and "large storage unit," which aligns with the historical MLS pattern showing storage in amenities and/or unit features on most listings. This looks like a real building feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no mention of a trash chute in any of the provided remarks. Because the listings repeatedly describe other building features in detail but omit any chute system, this MLS amenity looks unsupported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks reference a whirlpool or spa amenity. The amenity language in the remarks is limited to features like a pool and barbecue pavilion, with no sign of hot-tub or spa facilities.
Pool is supported by current MLS amenities across all listings and by at least one explicit public remark mentioning a "pool and barbecue pavilion." The evidence is building-level and consistent enough to treat as a true shared amenity. No remarks indicate the pool is private or otherwise unavailable to residents.
No public remarks mention a heated pool, heated swimming pool, or warm pool, and the MLS data does not consistently support the feature. Only 2 of 10 listings have the heated-pool amenity checked, which looks more like inconsistent agent input than a confirmed building feature. This should not be treated as a verified building amenity at this time.
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is supported by current MLS inclusions: 10 of 10 listings include "WASHER/DRYER." None of the public remarks explicitly mention laundry, which suggests the feature is being carried by MLS data rather than marketing copy, but the consistency across all current listings makes it highly reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is well supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly describe unit-specific stalls, including "2 garage parking spaces" and "3 side by side parking stalls," and the MLS history is nearly universal for ASSIGN. This looks like consistent building-level parking, not copy-paste noise.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed. The remarks mention "garage parking spaces" and the MLS data shows covered/garage indicators in all current listings. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and descriptions.
The listings consistently mention parking stalls/spaces as part of the unit offering, which strongly suggests deeded or included parking. While the remarks do not use the exact word "deeded," the repeated inclusion language supports a true value.
No analysis available
I searched for references to parking fees, monthly parking charges, or rental costs and found none. Since parking is described as included with the residence rather than rented, no fee is indicated in the remarks.
Six of nine MLS listings list guest parking and at least one public remark explicitly says 'lots of guest parking.' Historical data was high confidence and remarks confirm availability, indicating the building offers guest/visitor parking across the property.
Secured-entry parking is only indirectly supported. Several remarks describe the building as "highly secured" and note "24-hour security" plus "secured elevator access," while MLS data shows SECENT in 7/10 listings. This suggests secure access may exist, but the public remarks do not clearly confirm secured parking specifically.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for wording such as "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or "join waitlist for parking" and found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence that this building uses a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Security guard service appears to be a real building feature for Courtyards at Punahou. Across the provided remarks, at least 3 listings explicitly reference it with phrases like "24-hour security," "highly secured residence," and "secure elevator access." The MLS checkbox data is also consistent, with 7 of 10 current listings showing SECGUA.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports central air conditioning for this building. The historical MLS pattern was already high confidence, and current remarks explicitly mention a "brand-new air conditioning system installed in February 2025" in multiple listings, suggesting this is not just checkbox noise. The repeated wording across remarks reinforces that central AC is a real building/unit feature rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears supported by the MLS record across most listings (8 of 10 currently checked CONCRE). None of the public remarks explicitly say 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete,' so this is driven by the repeated MLS material field rather than agent descriptions. The evidence is moderate-to-strong and consistent enough to keep the feature as true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only two of eight MLS listings list masonry/stucco (MASSTU) and none of the public remarks mention masonry or stucco. This is weak, inconsistent checkbox evidence likely due to agent entry; include the feature only with low confidence pending stronger confirmation or a user/site verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 9 listings currently have 'ABOGRO' checked and none of the public remarks mention 'above ground' construction. With no historical support or explicit remarks and minimal checkbox presence across listings, the evidence does not support including this feature for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like "short-term rental allowed," "STR permitted," "NUC," and "TVU" and found no evidence. In the absence of any public-remarks support, STR is treated as not allowed/ not indicated for this building.
I looked for hotel pool references such as "hotel rental pool," "managed by hotel," or brand-specific pool language and found none. Because STR is not supported in the remarks, a hotel pool arrangement is also not indicated.
I searched for language indicating required participation, non-optional rental programs, or inability to opt out and found nothing. With no STR or hotel-pool evidence in the remarks, there is no basis to mark a mandatory pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as "lease expires 2050," "land lease to 2065," or "ground lease ends" and found no references. Because no specific expiry year appears in the public remarks, the lease expiry remains unknown.
I searched the listings for phrases like "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found nothing. With no public-remarks evidence, this is treated as not indicated in the building remarks.
I searched the remarks for insurance language such as "fully insured," "full insurance," and "walls-in coverage," and none was present. The monthly fees and capital improvement references do not confirm building insurance status, so this remains unverified in the remarks.
No public remarks mention a sprinkler system (0 of the listings' remarks), but 5 of 9 current MLS listings have the FIRSPR amenity checked and historical data previously indicated high confidence. Multiple agents have the FIRSPR checkbox selected across listings, and the prior high-confidence assessment plus current MLS prevalence indicate the building likely has a fire sprinkler system.
I looked for public-remark language like "fire life safety evaluation passed," "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," and similar phrasing, but found nothing. With no explicit mention in the remarks, there is no evidence to mark this as passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
One listing explicitly advertises "Ocean and Diamond Head Views," and the MLS view_descriptions show OCEAN in 1 of 8 listings. Evidence for ocean view is present but limited to a single listing/agent, so inclusion is warranted for buyers seeking ocean-view units.
Several remarks across different listings mention "mountain breezes" and "city and mountain views," indicating that some units offer mountain views or exposure. MLS checkbox data does not list MOUNTA, so evidence is moderate and appears in agent remarks rather than standardized fields.
No analysis available
City views are strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "city views" and "city and mountain views," and the MLS view field shows CITY in all 10/10 listings. This is consistent, high-confidence evidence that the building offers city-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks explicitly mention a resident manager, but the current MLS record shows RESMAN selected in 9 of 10 listings for this building. That pattern suggests the amenity is likely present, though the lack of remark-level confirmation means the evidence appears to come from MLS checkbox data rather than multiple agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.