Coral Terrace Apartments

All 10 MLS records for this building list the construction year as 1970, and no remarks suggest a different build or full reconstruction year. This uniformity across multiple listings supports 1970 as the correct year built.

All 10 MLS listings for this building have unit floor numbers between 1 and 6, with 6 as the highest. No remarks mention additional higher stories or a penthouse level, so the building is treated as a 6‑story structure.

The remarks for these listings describe layouts, size, and amenities but never state how many units are in the building. Because no listing or remark gives an explicit unit count, the total number of units remains unknown.

The remarks were reviewed for quantitative or qualitative owner-occupancy indicators such as '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', or similar language, but none were found. Therefore, the prior value of 56% is kept with low confidence due to lack of current confirmation.

Remarks were reviewed for any reference to elevators (e.g., 'elevator', 'multiple elevators') and none were found. Given the existing data and an 11-story, 36-unit context where one elevator is plausible, the current value of 1 is retained but with low confidence due to lack of explicit confirmation.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

None of the listings indicate central AC is included in the fees, and one listing explicitly highlights “window AC units,” implying individually controlled, non-central systems. Given the MLS data and remarks, central air is very unlikely to be a building-provided, fee-included utility.

10 of 11 current MLS listings indicate cable TV is included in the maintenance fee (CABTV). Public remarks for the units provided do not explicitly mention cable, but the consistent checkbox across most listings from different agents suggests this is a building-level inclusion rather than an isolated error.

Seven of 12 current listings include OTCOEX, which commonly represents other shared building expenses such as common-area electricity. No public remarks explicitly mention common electric or building power, so the evidence is moderately strong but may partly reflect copied MLS checkbox data.

No listings mark cooperative taxes as included, and the building is described as VA-approved and as standard Waikiki condos/apartments, which is inconsistent with a co-op structure. This makes it very unlikely that co-op taxes are part of the maintenance fees.

None of the reviewed listings indicate that unit electricity is included in the maintenance fee. Public remarks that talk about low or affordable HOA fees do not list electricity as a selling point, so electricity is almost certainly separately metered and not fee-included.

No listing indicates that gas is included in the HOA, and there is no mention of gas appliances or gas service in the remarks. Given the complete absence in the MLS checkboxes, gas is very unlikely to be part of the maintenance fee.

Most units are advertised with their own water heaters (WTRHTR), which per the provided guidance indicates building hot water should not be considered fee-included. The lone HOTWAT checkbox is more plausibly an agent error than evidence of a building-wide hot water inclusion.

A small minority of listings (2 of 10) mark internet service as included, while the majority do not, and no public remarks promote internet-included HOA as a feature. This pattern suggests the few positive checkboxes are likely inconsistent agent data rather than a true building-wide inclusion.

No listing mentions marina access or boat slips, and the MLS never checks any marina-related fee inclusions. The building is presented as a central Waikiki condo near beaches and shopping, so marina fees are almost certainly not part of the HOA.

All 12 current listings indicate that sewer is included in the association fees. No remarks explicitly quote 'sewer included,' but the unanimous and historically high-confidence MLS coding provides strong building-level evidence.

All 12 current listings indicate that water is included in the association fees. Although the supplied remarks do not explicitly mention water fees, the unanimous current MLS coding and prior High confidence make this feature strongly supported.

None of the listings mention BBQ areas, grills, or an outdoor cooking space, and the MLS amenity for BBQ is never selected. For a Waikiki condo, a shared BBQ area would typically be marketed, so its absence in both data and remarks indicates it is not available.

Across all provided listings, there are zero references to any form of bicycle storage or bike room, and the bike storage-related MLS amenity is never checked. For Waikiki buildings that do have this feature, it is typically highlighted, so its complete absence here strongly suggests there is no dedicated bike storage.

The building is near the Ala Wai Canal but there is no advertising of boat docks, slips, or marina facilities. Given the unchecked MLS field and absence from remarks, the property does not appear to offer any dedicated boat dock or marina access.

Agents describe covered/assigned parking and a secured parking garage but never reference a car wash area. With no MLS indication of this amenity, it is very likely there is no dedicated car wash facility on site.

Across 10 listings, there is no mention of a clubhouse, club house, or community center. Given the consistent absence in both MLS checkboxes and narrative descriptions, the building very likely does not have a clubhouse.

None of the listings describe concierge or front-desk services, and the concierge amenity is never selected in the MLS. Given this consistent omission, the building almost certainly does not provide concierge service.

Remarks emphasize that the building is pet-friendly but do not describe any dedicated on-site dog park or dog run. With the MLS amenity unchecked across all listings, it is very likely there is no building dog park.

Across all listings, there is no mention of a doorman or lobby attendant, despite repeated marketing of other conveniences. With 0/10 DOORMA amenity checks and complete absence from remarks, it is highly likely the building does not offer doorman service.

Across all reviewed listings for this building, no agent remarks reference a gym, fitness center, or exercise room. Combined with the fact that the exercise room checkbox is never selected in the MLS, this strongly suggests the building does not offer a dedicated exercise facility.

Across all listings, there is no suggestion of limousine, house car, or courtesy car service. The absence in both MLS checkboxes and detailed marketing language strongly indicates the building does not offer limo or car service.

Listing narratives emphasize the units' interiors and location, with no discussion of meeting or conference spaces. This, plus the lack of MLS indication, supports that the building does not offer a shared meeting room.

At least 11 current listing remarks mention a lanai, typically describing private, spacious, usable, or wrap-around lanais ranging from approximately 174–175 square feet. This aligns with the strong historical evidence and current MLS amenity selections, indicating patio/deck space is a legitimate building feature rather than isolated copy-paste.

The remarks highlight walkable access to beaches, shops, and nearby public spaces, but do not market a building-controlled jogging path or trail. With the MLS amenity unchecked in all listings, this appears to be a neighborhood feature rather than a building amenity.

Agents describe nearby family-friendly Centennial Park, indicating playground-type amenities exist nearby but not as part of the building. The lack of any on-site playground mention and consistent MLS negatives suggest the building does not have its own playground.

All outdoor space descriptions focus on lanais and the adjacent park, not any type of yard. Across multiple listings, there is no indication of private or fenced yard areas, so the building should not be considered to offer private yards.

None of the listing remarks reference any golf, putting, or practice green amenities. Given the total absence of MLS and narrative evidence, the building almost certainly does not have a putting green.

The marketing focuses on proximity to Waikiki Beach, shopping, and parks rather than on-site recreation decks or amenity spaces. The absence of both MLS and remark references suggests there is no common recreation area provided by the building.

Agents do not describe any shared rec room, game room, or entertainment room, despite otherwise detailed descriptions. Together with the consistently unchecked MLS field, this indicates the building lacks a designated recreation room.

Marketing focuses on the abundance of nearby restaurants and world-class cuisine in Waikiki, not any in-building dining options. The consistent MLS and remark pattern indicates there is no restaurant inside the building itself.

No listing advertises any rooftop amenities or roof deck, despite detailed promotion of lanais and views. The consistent absence in both data and remarks indicates there is no shared rooftop amenity for residents.

Agents do not market any sauna or steam facilities among the building amenities. The consistent lack of MLS and remark mentions suggests there is no sauna in the building.

None of the 10 listings describe dedicated building storage units or lockers, and the MLS amenity checkbox for storage is never selected. The only 'storage' references clearly refer to in-unit cabinets, not common-area storage. Given the consistent omission in both remarks and checkboxes, it's very likely the building does not offer separate storage units.

Public remarks for multiple units in this building describe location, parking, pet policy, interior upgrades, and lanais but never mention any surfboard or board storage facilities. Based on this absence of evidence in marketing materials, the building is assumed not to offer dedicated surfboard storage, though this cannot be ruled out with complete certainty.

There are no references in any listing remarks to tennis courts or tennis facilities. With the tennis amenity always unchecked in the MLS, it is very likely this building does not have tennis courts.

The trash chute is listed in 11 of 12 current MLS records, consistent with the previously High-confidence building data. No provided public remarks explicitly mention a trash chute, so the evidence comes primarily from repeated MLS amenity reporting rather than descriptive remarks.

Parking is described as assigned, covered, and in a secured garage, with no reference to valet or hotel-style services. Given the repeated emphasis on self-parking and the lack of any valet mention, valet service does not appear to be offered.

Listings never describe the building as a gated or fenced complex, nor do they mention perimeter or privacy walls. With 0/10 GATED/WALFEN amenities and only garage security referenced, the property is very likely not enclosed by a wall or fence in the sense of a gated community.

Listings emphasize lanais, interior renovations, and location but make no reference to spa, hot tub, or whirlpool amenities. With no MLS support, the building appears not to have a shared whirlpool or hot tub.

No listings (0/10) indicate a pool in MLS amenities, and none of the remarks mention a pool, lap pool, or swimming pool. Multiple agents highlight nearby Waikiki Beach and other conveniences instead, which strongly suggests the building itself does not offer a pool.

There is no mention of a pool, let alone a heated pool, in any of the 10 listings or their remarks. Because the building appears to lack a pool entirely, a heated pool can be confidently ruled out.

The remarks describe the unit’s interior, lanai, location, and nearby amenities, but do not mention any pool, let alone a salt water pool. I specifically searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found no references, so this feature is marked as not present based on lack of evidence in the remarks.

In-unit laundry is strongly supported across multiple listings. At least 5 remarks explicitly mention the feature, including "in-unit washer and dryer," "in-unit washer/dryer," and "Washer and Dryer in unit," while another specifies the washer in the kitchen and dryer on the lanai. The evidence aligns with the current MLS data showing washer/dryer in inclusions for 12 of 12 listings.

Across all provided remarks, there is no mention of a shared or community laundry room, and agents instead highlight in-unit washer/dryers. With 0/10 MLS listings checking community laundry as an amenity, the evidence suggests the building does not have separate community laundry facilities. Buyers should assume laundry is handled within units rather than via a shared laundry room.

The text does not reference any paid community laundry facilities (coin-op, card systems, or laundry fees). Searched for terms like 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'card-operated', 'laundry fee', and found no evidence, so paid community laundry is considered unlikely from the provided information.

The remarks consistently describe private in-unit laundry and never mention any shared laundry rooms or laundry on each floor. Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and similar, but found none, so community laundry on every floor is considered unlikely based on available text.

Multiple listings describe the units as coming with '1-parking' or 'one parking stall,' and MLS parking_features indicate some form of parking in 10/10 listings. Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents that the building offers parking to residents.

Assigned parking is supported by strong historical MLS evidence and repeated remarks from multiple listings. Key phrases include "assigned parking" in several descriptions and "1-parking condo" or "one parking stall," indicating this is a building-level offering rather than a single copy-paste mention.

Covered parking is strongly supported by both historical MLS data and multiple explicit current remarks. The descriptions state "covered parking stall" and "secured parking garage," confirming that the building offers covered parking to at least some units.

The listings consistently describe one assigned or covered parking stall. Because deeded ownership is not explicitly stated, deeded parking cannot be confirmed.

Across all available listings and remarks there is no mention of EV chargers or stations, and MLS checkboxes for EV charging are consistently unset. This strongly suggests the building does not currently offer EV charging facilities.

The remarks mention assigned, covered, and secured parking but provide no separate parking fee. The monthly parking cost is therefore unknown.

No listing remarks mention guest or visitor parking, and the MLS never checks the guest parking option. The consistent lack of any reference indicates the building does not provide dedicated guest parking stalls.

Several agents describe 'Secure entry' and a 'secured parking garage,' showing that access to the building and parking is controlled. Despite limited MLS checkbox usage, the text evidence across multiple listings strongly supports secured parking entry as a building feature.

Neither MLS data nor agent remarks reference tandem or back-to-back stalls. This consistent omission indicates that tandem parking is not a standard feature of the building’s parking configuration.

There are no references to valet or attended parking in any remarks, and the MLS valet option is never checked. This strongly indicates the building does not offer valet parking services.

The listings describe parking assigned to the unit and do not reference a waitlist system. Based on the absence of waitlist language, no parking waitlist is indicated.

No agent remarks note a 'keyed elevator,' 'fob-access elevator,' or 'secured elevator,' which are strong selling points when present. Combined with 0/10 ELEVAT security amenity checks, this strongly indicates the elevators are not restricted by key or fob beyond normal access.

Listings describe the building as having secure/secured entry but never mention key card, fob, or electronic access systems. Searched for terms like key card, fob access, card reader, and electronic access with no direct matches, so a card/fob system cannot be confirmed.

None of the listings or amenities data reference a security guard or 24/7 staffed security, despite multiple opportunities to market it. Agents only mention generic 'Secure entry' or 'Secured entry, secured parking garage,' which typically indicates controlled access, not a guard. Given 0/10 SECGUA and no explicit mentions, it is very likely there is no security guard service.

The remarks highlight secure entry, location, and amenities but do not reference any patrolling security service. Searched for phrases such as security patrol, roving security, and patrol service, and found no evidence this feature exists.

No listing remarks reference security cameras, CCTV, or any form of video monitoring, and the SECSYS amenity box is never checked. Given repeated but generic references to secured entry without mention of a system, it is more likely the building does not have a marketed video security system.

Across all provided listings, there are no mentions of central air or HVAC, and MLS checkboxes for central AC are consistently unchecked (0/10). One listing explicitly highlights 'window AC units' instead of central air, reinforcing that cooling is handled individually rather than through a central system.

No listing remarks refer to split or ductless mini-split AC, and the MLS split AC checkbox is never used (0/10). The presence of window AC units as the described upgrade in at least one unit makes it unlikely that any units are using split systems in this building.

Two listings explicitly mention "window AC units," while 4 of 12 current MLS listings include ACWIUN in the inclusions. The explicit wording appears duplicated across listings, but it aligns with the historical high-confidence evidence and supports that window air conditioning is available in at least some units.

Concrete construction is indicated in 11 of 12 current MLS listings, with the historical record also previously rating this feature highly. The public remarks focus on unit renovations and amenities rather than construction materials, but the repeated checkbox data across nearly all listings provides strong building-level evidence.

At least one listing identifies double wall construction, and no listings conflict with this. This suggests the building likely has some double-wall construction, though the evidence is limited to a single agent’s checkbox.

No listings indicate hollow tile construction, and agents instead overwhelmingly mark concrete. Given the building type and total absence of references, hollow tile construction is very unlikely.

Some agents (2 of 10 listings) report masonry/stucco construction, and none contradict it. This partial but consistent indication supports that the building likely has masonry/stucco elements, though documentation is not uniform.

No listings mark steel frame, while nearly all agree on concrete construction, making a steel-frame primary structure very unlikely. Remarks focus on interiors and provide no indication of steel framing.

Some agents (2 of 10) report a slab foundation, and none contradict it. Combined with typical construction practices for similar Waikiki condos, this points to the building being constructed on a concrete slab.

No analysis available

None of the 10 listings select wood frame construction, and 9 of 10 instead identify concrete. Given the condo’s high-rise style and location, it is very unlikely to be wood-frame.

Above-ground construction is checked in 2 of 12 current listings, with medium historical support. None of the provided remarks explicitly mention “above ground construction” or above-ground materials, so this is retained as a moderately supported feature rather than treated as strongly verified.

A minority (2 of 10) of MLS listings identify brick construction, implying the building may incorporate some brick components. Because the majority do not check this box and there are no explicit remarks, this is treated as likely but with moderate confidence.

No listings report single wall construction, and the building’s condo form and location are inconsistent with Hawaii’s traditional single-wall style. It is therefore almost certainly not single-wall construction.

The remarks describe the property as suitable for a residence, second home, or investment but do not explicitly permit short-term rentals. No STR authorization or prohibition was stated, so STR is not indicated.

The remarks contain no references to a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program. Because STR permission is not established, hotel-pool participation is false under the prerequisite rule.

The listings do not mention any rental-pool obligation or mandatory hotel program. Since STR is not established as allowed, mandatory hotel-pool participation must be false.

None of the 10 listings explicitly indicate Fee Simple tenure in either the MLS fields or remarks (no 'fee simple' or 'FS' language). Because MLS tenure appears generally unfilled and no remarks clarify, the presence of Fee Simple units is unknown.

Across 10 listings, none are marked as Leasehold in the MLS and no remarks mention lease terms or lease expiration. Because tenure information appears omitted rather than clarified, it is not possible to confirm whether the building has Leasehold units.

The remarks were searched for leasehold language and specific expiration or extension years. No applicable lease expiry year was found, so the value remains unknown.

Several listings identify 2222 Aloha Drive as a VA-approved building and mention VA assumption financing. The repeated explicit references provide strong evidence that VA financing is available.

Remarks were scanned for phrases such as 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'fully covered insurance', 'comprehensive building insurance', or 'walls-in coverage' and none were present. In the absence of explicit statements, this is set to false with medium confidence, as full coverage is typically advertised if available.

Ten out of ten listings do not include fire sprinklers in their amenities, and no remarks reference sprinklers or a fire suppression system. Given this consistent omission and the building’s 1970 vintage, it is very likely the building does not have a fire sprinkler system.

The text was checked for terms like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', 'life safety compliant', or 'passed fire inspection' and none appeared. With no explicit evidence, this is marked as false with medium confidence, assuming such a certification would likely be mentioned if present.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

No listings mention 'ocean', 'water', or 'Pacific' views, and 0/10 MLS view_descriptions include OCEAN. Agents repeatedly highlight proximity to Waikiki Beach and Ala Wai Canal views instead, which strongly implies the building does not have notable ocean-view units.

At least one listing describes 'stunning views of Diamond Head,' and 1/10 MLS records include MOUNTA in the view field. This confirms that some units in the building enjoy mountain/Diamond Head-facing views.

Remarks for a corner unit specifically advertise 'stunning views of Diamond Head.' Combined with 1/10 MLS entries flagging Diamond Head views, this provides strong evidence that certain units in the building offer Diamond Head vistas.

Historical MLS records list CITY for 6 of 11 listings. Multiple current remarks explicitly state 'city living' and 'Experience the epitome of city living' (appearing in several unit descriptions), indicating city/urban views are promoted across agents rather than being a lone copy-paste error; other remarks reference 'peek-a-boo' Ala Wai Canal or Diamond Head but city views are repeatedly marketed.

Neither the marketing remarks nor the MLS data mention coastline or shoreline vistas. With COASTL absent in all MLS view fields and other views highlighted instead, coastline views are very unlikely to be a defining feature.

1/10 MLS records include GARDEN in the view field, suggesting at least one unit has a garden/landscaped outlook. Remarks mentioning the building’s position across from Centennial Park are consistent with some units overlooking green space.

No listing remarks mention golf-course or fairway views, and GOLCOU does not appear in any of the 10 MLS view_descriptions. With other views being specifically called out instead, it is very unlikely that golf course views are a notable building feature.

Several listings highlight 'peek-a-boo views of the Ala Wai Canal,' and 2/10 MLS entries flag MARCAN for the view. This consistent mention of canal views across different listings indicates the building offers marina/canal-view units.

There are no references to sunrise, morning light, or east-facing exposure in the remarks, and SUNRIS does not appear in any MLS view_descriptions. This consistent omission indicates that sunrise views are not a recognized feature of this building.

No current listings mention sunset views or related western/evening exposure, while 2 of 12 explicitly list NONE in the view descriptions. The only view references are “peek-a-boo views of the Ala Wai Canal” and “stunning views of Diamond Head,” so there is no strong evidence that the building offers sunset views.

Listings consistently describe nearby amenities as beaches, shopping, and Centennial Park, with no reference to cemeteries. The complete absence of CEMETA in MLS view fields provides strong evidence that cemetery views are not present.

Remarks highlight views of Diamond Head, Ala Wai Canal, and general city/ Waikiki ambiance, but never mention Friday night or any fireworks views from the property. Given this absence in multiple detailed listings, it is likely the building does not notably feature a fireworks view.

No analysis available

Several listings, including those from different agents, clearly describe the building as pet-friendly, with some advising buyers to verify details. One listing unambiguously states 'The building is pet friendly', supporting that pets (e.g., cats/dogs) are allowed in this building.

Four of ten MLS listings for this building check the resident manager amenity, and none state that there is no on-site manager. The repetition across several listings indicates the building likely has a resident manager on property.

The building is consistently marketed as a residential condo with VA financing and typical condo amenities, not as a hotel-operated property. With no references to hotel programs or condotel structures, it should not be classified as a condotel.

Financing language (VA-approved, VA assumption) and condo terminology strongly indicate standard condominium ownership. In the absence of any cooperative-related language or codes, the building is not a co-op.