Coral Strand Ltd
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Coral Strand Ltd
Building Overview
Coral Strand Ltd in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis: concrete building (1961); pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Coral Strand Ltd
Coral Strand Ltd is located in the Diamond Head–Kapahulu–St. Louis neighborhood. According to available records, the building was completed in 1961 and is constructed of concrete. MLS data supplied for this profile does not include unit counts, floor plans, or square footage.
Key policies for Coral Strand Ltd noted in MLS data include a prohibition on pets and a restriction against short-term rentals. The property’s management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No specific common-area amenities are provided in the MLS information used for this description.
Additional details such as parking provisions, maintenance fees, assessments, or other building rules were not included in the MLS data provided. Based on MLS data; buyers and agents should verify parking, fees, management, and other material facts with the listing broker or management company before relying on this information.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
None of the provided listings discuss the share of units occupied by owners vs. renters. Searched for explicit percentages and descriptors of owner occupancy, but since nothing is mentioned, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
The remarks describe many building amenities (pool, parking, storage, plumbing retrofit) but never reference elevators. Searched for terms such as 'elevator', 'lift', and 'stairs' with no results, so the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable is strongly supported across the building-level data: 10/10 current MLS listings have CABTV included. Multiple remarks describe the HOA/maintenance fee as including 'all utilities,' which aligns with cable being part of the package. Evidence looks consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent note.
Common-area electricity is supported by current MLS data and repeated remarks about 'all utilities' being included. While agents usually do not spell out hall/elevator power, the building-level MLS checkbox pattern and consistent remarks provide strong corroboration. This appears to be a stable building-level inclusion rather than a unit-specific feature.
No analysis available
Electricity has very strong support: 9/10 current MLS listings include ELECTR. Multiple public remarks explicitly say the maintenance or HOA fees include 'all utilities,' making this one of the clearest included-fee features in the building. The evidence is consistent across different listings and agents.
No analysis available
Clear evidence of hot water being included: HOTWAT is checked in 8/9 current listings, historical data was High, and agent remarks repeatedly state 'maintenance fees include all utilities.' Absence of WTRHTR in inclusions further supports that hot water is provided/covered by the building.
Internet appears to be included based on 6/10 current MLS listings checked for INTSER and repeated remarks about 'all utilities.' The evidence is somewhat implied rather than explicit, but it is consistent across multiple listings. This is strong enough to keep as included for a building-level search feature.
No analysis available
Sewer is strongly supported by 9/10 current MLS listings and the repeated 'all utilities' language in remarks. The building-level checkbox data is very consistent, and nothing in the remarks suggests a recent change. Confidence remains high that sewer is included in the fees.
Water inclusion has the strongest support of all the fee items: 10/10 current MLS listings have WATER included. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'all utilities' being included, reinforcing the MLS pattern. This is highly consistent across the building and should be treated as a stable feature.
2 of 9 current MLS listings include BBQ in the amenities checklist, however none of the public remarks for the building mention barbecue, grill, or grilling facilities. Evidence is limited to amenity checkboxes from a minority of listings and may be agent copy/paste; include the feature with low-to-moderate confidence pending stronger confirmation or owner/manager verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is strong that the building offers patios/decks: 6 of 9 current MLS listings show PATDEC/COVPAT and several remarks state 'three private lanais' or 'private lanais,' describing indoor-outdoor living and lanais off living areas and bedrooms. Mentions appear in multiple agent remarks across listings and align with the MLS amenity flag, so include the feature for buyers.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
RECARE appears in 4 of 10 current listings, with a similar pattern in prior data (3 of 7 listings). No public remarks explicitly use phrases like "recreation area," "rec area," or "recreation deck," so this looks like a repeated MLS amenity checkbox rather than something described in marketing copy.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple MLS listings and agent remarks confirm building storage/lockers are offered: current MLS checkboxes show storage in 6 of 9 listings (amenities) and 7 of 9 (unit features), and several public remarks explicitly state "locked storage" or "designated locked storage." Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with prior high-confidence data, so the building is very likely to provide storage units/lockers.
I looked for surfboard storage terminology, including board storage or bike-and-surf storage. The remarks mention locked storage and designated storage, but nothing specifically identifying surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a shared swimming pool. Multiple listings explicitly mention a pool, with phrases like "oceanfront pool" and "stunning oceanfront pool," and the current MLS data shows pool amenities across all current listings. The repeated wording across different remarks suggests this is a real building amenity, not just a copy-paste error.
Very strong evidence that the pool is heated. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly say "heated pool," including "heated saltwater pool" and "oceanfront heated pool," and the MLS data still shows heated-pool amenities in most listings. This is consistent across agents and appears to be a genuine building feature.
There are multiple direct references to a heated saltwater pool. This is explicit evidence that the pool is salt water.
Strong evidence across multiple listings confirms in-unit laundry at Coral Strand. At least 4 remarks explicitly mention 'in-unit washer and dryer' or 'washer / dryer' in the residence, and the pattern appears consistent rather than a one-off agent error.
Evidence for shared/community laundry is weaker than for in-unit laundry. The MLS checkbox appears on 6 of 10 listings, but none of the public remarks reference a shared laundry room, coin laundry, or laundry on each floor, so this may reflect MLS copy/paste rather than a clearly described building feature.
I looked for indications that the building's community laundry requires payment, such as coin laundry or card-operated machines. The public remarks do not mention any shared laundry fee or paid laundry setup.
I searched for wording like "laundry on every floor," "laundry room on each floor," and similar public-remark references. The listings mention in-unit washer/dryer in some residences, but nothing about shared laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is consistently indicated in MLS checkbox data for all 7 listings and is explicitly mentioned in the public remarks (e.g., 'Secure underground parking', 'Secured garage parking'). Evidence is strong across multiple agent remarks and matches the MLS parking_features entries, supporting high confidence that the building offers parking.
Most current MLS entries indicate assigned parking, with 8 of 10 listings checked as ASSIGN. The public remarks do not explicitly use the words 'assigned' or 'reserved,' but the repeated parking references suggest the MLS data is likely reflecting the building’s parking setup rather than a one-off agent error.
Covered parking is well supported by the remarks: one listing states 'secure underground parking' and another says 'secured garage parking.' Current MLS data also shows 6/10 listings with covered/garage-type parking codes, so the evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
I searched for explicit deeded-parking language like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The listings only describe secure/underground/garage parking, which is not enough to confirm deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as "parking fee," "monthly parking charge," "parking rental," or any added cost for parking and found none. The remarks mention parking availability and security, but not any separate monthly parking charge.
No analysis available
4 of 9 MLS listings checked 'SECENT', and multiple public remarks explicitly mention 'secure underground parking' and 'secured garage parking' and 'locked storage', indicating parking access is secured. The combination of MLS flags and direct remarks across listings yields strong evidence the building's parking has secure entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," or instructions to join a parking waitlist, but found nothing. The public remarks only state that parking is secure/garage/underground.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob access language such as keycard entry, fob access, or electronic building access. The remarks mention secure parking and a well-managed building, but nothing specifically indicating card-based security access.
No analysis available
I searched for any reference to a patrol service or roving security staff. The public remarks describe the building as secure and well maintained, but do not mention security patrols.
No analysis available
None of the 9 public remark texts explicitly mention 'central AC' or a building-wide HVAC; instead multiple listings say 'dual-zone Mitsubishi air conditioning' or simply 'AC', which describes in-unit (split) systems. MLS checkbox usage is inconsistent (2/9 & 3/9 mentions across fields), suggesting copy/paste of features by agents rather than a confirmed central air system—evidence is strong that the building does not offer central air.
Evidence supports split AC in this building: 2/10 MLS listings include ACSPL, and multiple remarks describe "dual-zone Mitsubishi air conditioning" / "two zone Mitsubishi air conditioning." This looks like a real building feature available in some units, not just a one-off agent checkbox.
Three of seven current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion (3/7 agents checked window AC). None of the public remarks explicitly state 'window AC' or 'window unit'—they reference 'two zone Mitsubishi air conditioning' and generic 'AC'—so there is moderate MLS-based evidence that some units have window air conditioners, but the remarks suggest other units use split systems and the checkbox may be inconsistent across agents.
All 10 current listings identify the building as concrete construction via the MLS materials field. The public remarks do not mention concrete directly, so this appears to be MLS data consistency rather than remark-confirmed language, but the repeated checkmark across all listings makes the evidence very strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction appears only once in the current MLS data and is not supported by any of the public remarks. With no descriptive language such as 'above ground construction' or similar phrasing, the evidence is too weak to treat as a building feature, so this is best treated as not verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR language such as "short-term rental allowed," "vacation rental allowed," "NUC," or "TVU," and found none. Since there is no public remark indicating STR permission, it is treated as not allowed/unsupported by the remarks.
I looked for hotel-pool references such as hotel rental pool, Hilton/Ritz/Trump pool, or hotel-managed operations and found none. Because STR itself is not supported in the remarks, hotel-pool participation is also marked false.
I searched for wording like "mandatory pool," "must participate," "cannot opt out," or similar and found nothing. With no evidence of STR or a hotel program, there is no basis to mark mandatory participation true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold or ground-lease wording such as "lease expires 2050," "ground lease ends," or any renewal/extension year, but found none. The remarks describe the building as a co-op/oceanfront residence but do not provide a lease expiry date.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found nothing. With no public evidence of VA eligibility, this is treated as not indicated in the listings.
Marketing remarks explain what HOA fees cover (utilities, property tax) but give no indication of full or walls-in insurance coverage by the HOA. Searched for 'fully insured', 'walls-in', 'building insurance', and similar terms without any findings, so full coverage cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
The listings highlight maintenance, plumbing retrofit, and general condition but do not mention any fire/life safety evaluation or certification. Searched for phrases like 'fire life safety', 'FLSE', 'fire inspection', and 'life safety compliant' with no matches, so this is assumed not documented/present in marketing materials.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are clearly a building-level feature. Multiple remarks explicitly say 'ocean view,' 'direct oceanfront,' 'Pacific Ocean,' and 'oceanfront views,' with the current MLS data also showing OCEAN in 10/10 listings. This is consistent across many agent remarks and is not just a one-off copy-paste.
Multiple listings mention mountain views (e.g., 'Diamond Head, the Honolulu skyline, and the Ko?olau Mountains', 'distant mountains'), indicating some units offer mauka/mountain vistas. Remarks are explicit and repeated across listings.
Diamond Head views are repeatedly documented in the public remarks. Several listings explicitly mention 'Diamond Head vista,' 'direct ocean and Diamond Head views,' and 'unobstructed views of Diamond Head,' while current MLS data also shows DIAHEA in 5/10 listings. The evidence is strong enough to confirm this as a building-level view option.
Several remarks call out the 'Honolulu skyline' and 'Honolulu' views (e.g., 'sweeping views... of the Honolulu skyline', 'close proximity to world famous dining and entertainment of Waikiki'), indicating some units provide city/downtown views.
Coastline views are explicitly mentioned in the remarks, including phrases like 'capturing the beauty of the coastline' and references to the Gold Coast/oceanfront setting. Current MLS data shows COASTL in 8/10 listings, which supports this as a common building-level view feature. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings rather than isolated agent wording.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are directly noted in several listings (quotes include 'enjoy sunset views', 'front-row access to... world-class sunsets'), showing that some units offer notable sunset/western exposures.
No analysis available
I searched for direct references to viewing Friday night fireworks from the building, unit, or lanai. The remarks focus on ocean, Diamond Head, sunset, and skyline views, but do not mention fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Most current listings support this feature: 9 out of 10 include RESMAN in amenities. While the remarks do not explicitly say "resident manager" or "on-site manager," the repeated MLS amenity flag across multiple listings suggests the building has a resident manager and that this is likely not just a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
The building is clearly described as a cooperative in multiple current listings. Key phrases include "boutique oceanfront co-op" and repeated notes that "Co-op property taxes" are included in maintenance/HOA fees. This aligns with the historical MLS pattern showing COOTAX in most association fee entries, so confidence is very high.
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.