Colony at the Peninsula
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Colony at the Peninsula
Building Overview
Colony at the Peninsula in Hawaii Kai — 2005 concrete/steel building with pool and fitness center.
About Colony at the Peninsula
Colony at the Peninsula is a residential building located in the Hawaii Kai neighborhood, completed in 2005. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete with a steel frame. MLS data does not provide total unit count or square footage here.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool, fitness center, and a BBQ area. The property lists a resident manager and a security guard as part of building services. The building has two elevators and central air conditioning.
Additional details from MLS list covered, assigned parking and guest parking. Pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. Management company is listed as unknown in the available records. Buyers should verify all building features, rules, fees, and availability with the listing agent or management, as this summary is based on MLS data only.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage, "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," but found none. The remarks focus on amenities, upgrades, security, and location rather than ownership composition, so the percentage remains unknown.
The public remarks directly confirm that this building has two elevators, matching the current building context. I found repeated explicit references to two elevators, so this is high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV appears to be included for the building. The strongest current confirmation is the remark stating the fee "includes internet, cable," which aligns with the historical MLS pattern of 14/20 listings checked for cable. Evidence is strong and consistent across listings, though some agents may be copy-pasting HOA inclusions.
Common-area electricity appears to be included in association fees for some units in this building. The strongest evidence is the MLS pattern (11/20 listings with OTCOEX); public remarks do not mention it directly, so this is based on listing data rather than narrative confirmation. The consistency across multiple listings suggests a genuine building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is very likely not included in the maintenance fee for this building. Across the provided remarks, many listings mention a 'new water heater,' 'replaced water heater,' or similar wording, which aligns with unit-level hot water heaters rather than building-provided hot water. The MLS pattern also strongly supports this, with WTRHTR appearing far more often than HOTWAT.
Internet service appears to be included in the maintenance fees for the building or many units. The current listing text explicitly says the fee "includes internet," and the MLS data shows 13 of 20 listings checked for internet service. This is strong building-level evidence, though some MLS entries may be copy-pasted.
Several listings (many agent remarks) explicitly state a separate marina fee with dollar amounts and note marina fees are paid separately; while a minority of MLS checkboxes include MARINA, the consistent language in remarks shows marina fees/access are not included in standard HOA maintenance.
Sewer inclusion is ambiguous. While 6/20 current MLS records have sewer checked, multiple remarks explicitly list sewer as separate, such as "sewer ($70.72/mo)" and "water/sewer" billed separately. That suggests the MLS data may be inconsistent or copy-pasted rather than a clear building-wide inclusion.
Water-in-fees is somewhat ambiguous but leans positive at the building level. The current MLS data shows 11 of 20 listings with WATER included, yet some remarks state water is billed separately or as part of a separate water/sewer fee. This suggests inconsistent agent reporting rather than a clear building-wide rule.
BBQ/grilling facilities are consistently confirmed across the entire listing set. The remarks repeatedly mention BBQ areas, BBQ picnic areas, and BBQ grills, making this one of the clearest building amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities have moderate-to-strong support: the MLS data is not as universal as other amenities, but several remarks specifically call out a "car wash area" or "car wash station." That makes this feature plausible and supported enough to include.
The shared community space is well supported, though agents use different labels such as 'clubhouse,' 'club room,' and 'recreation room.' With 17/20 MLS listings checking the amenity and multiple remarks confirming it, this appears to be a real common facility.
No analysis available
Moderate evidence: while only ~3 of 20 MLS checkbox entries currently indicate dog parks, several public remarks explicitly mention 'dog park' or '2 "doggie parks"' and many listings call the community pet-friendly with walking paths—supporting that dedicated dog exercise areas exist though the checkbox is not universally applied.
No analysis available
This feature is strongly confirmed across the listing set. Multiple remarks from different agents describe a 'fitness center,' 'gym,' or 'exercise room,' often alongside other shared amenities, which suggests consistent building access rather than a one-off unit feature.
No analysis available
Meeting-room style space is referenced directly in several remarks, including 'meeting room' and 'meeting/event room.' The MLS record also supports it in 14/20 listings, so this is a credible shared amenity even if not universal in every agent remark.
Very strong evidence that the building offers patio/deck-style outdoor spaces. Across the current remarks, well over 20 listings mention a lanai, covered lanai, patio, or al-fresco outdoor space, including phrases like "spacious, covered lanai," "private lanai," and "covered patio." This is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS amenity data.
Walking/jogging path amenities are very well supported across the listing set. Multiple listings reference 'walking paths,' 'marina-front walking/jogging paths,' or similar wording, indicating a shared community path system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation area features are well supported across the remarks, often paired with pools, playgrounds, and landscaped common grounds. The language varies, but the amenity appears to refer to shared outdoor recreational spaces within the community.
A shared recreation room/club room is supported by both the MLS record and public remarks. Agents use varied wording such as 'meeting room,' 'party room,' 'club house,' and 'recreation room,' which is consistent with a common amenity space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is clearly supported by the remarks across multiple listings. Several agents mention shared building storage such as "surfboard/kayak storage" and "rentable storage for stand-up paddle boards and surfboards," with one note even saying it is "soon to be installed new surfboard and kayak storage." This suggests the building offers storage/locker-type amenities for residents, not just unit-level closet space.
The public remarks directly confirm surfboard storage facilities, including references to surfboard/kayak storage and rentable storage for surfboards and stand-up paddle boards. This is strong evidence for the feature.
No analysis available
Trash chute is supported by the MLS checkbox data, but unlike the other features it is not mentioned in the public remarks. Because it appears in a majority of current listings yet lacks remark confirmation, this is a moderate-confidence building amenity rather than a fully corroborated one.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/hot tub/spa amenities are repeatedly confirmed in the remarks and MLS history. Listings mention 'whirlpool,' 'hot tubs,' 'jacuzzi,' and 'spa,' making this a well-supported amenity for the building.
Pool access is strongly and consistently supported across the listings. Many remarks from multiple agents mention shared amenities such as "2 swimming pools," "2 saltwater pools," "private pool," and "resort-style amenities," with dozens of references overall. This appears to be a genuine building/community amenity, not just checkbox copy-paste.
Ambiguous/weak evidence for heated pools: 6 of 20 MLS amenities previously indicated HEAPOO, but none of the public remarks explicitly say "heated pool"; remarks repeatedly mention "saltwater pools," "whirlpool/hot tub," and "hot tubs," suggesting heated spas rather than heated swimming pools. Given lack of explicit mentions across multiple agents, heated pool is not confirmed.
There are repeated direct mentions of saltwater pools in the remarks, leaving little ambiguity. This is a strong confirmation that the community pool(s) are salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly confirmed across the building. Dozens of listing remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases such as "full-size washer and dryer in the unit," "new washer and dryer," and "washer & dryer were replaced." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so this feature should be considered reliably present.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as coin laundry, coin-op, quarters, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. Nothing in the remarks indicates any paid shared laundry setup, and the references are mostly to in-unit washers and dryers.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on every floor," "community laundry," and similar floor-by-floor laundry references. The listings instead repeatedly mention in-unit washer/dryer or laundry upgrades, which does not support a building-wide laundry facility on every floor.
No analysis available
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported across many listings. Multiple remarks explicitly say "assigned," including "2 assigned covered tandem parking stalls," "2 assigned parking stalls," and "2 reserved parking stalls," showing this is not just an MLS checkbox artifact. The consistency across multiple listings and agents makes this a high-confidence building feature.
Covered parking is confirmed across the building and appears consistently in many remarks. Multiple listings describe "secure, covered garage," "2 covered parking stalls," and "2 assigned covered stalls," which aligns with the very high historical MLS pattern rather than copy-paste error.
I looked for explicit phrases like deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, or stall included with title. The remarks consistently describe assigned or secured parking stalls, which suggests parking exists, but not that it is deeded. Since deeded ownership is not explicitly stated, I marked this as false based on absence of evidence for deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly parking charge, parking rental, or any additional parking cost language. The remarks mention parking stalls many times, but no separate monthly parking fee is disclosed. With no explicit parking cost in the remarks, this stays unknown.
Guest parking is explicitly supported in multiple remarks, including phrases like "guest parking" and "many Guest Parking." The feature appears repeatedly enough across listings and agents to confirm it is available at the building.
There is solid evidence that parking access is secured or controlled. Remarks reference gated entry, secured garage parking, and security-controlled access, which supports a secured-entry parking classification.
Tandem parking is one of the clearest and most consistent features in the building. Numerous listings independently mention "tandem" or "covered tandem" parking, indicating this is not just checkbox noise but a well-established building feature.
No analysis available
I specifically searched for parking waitlist or parking waiting list language and found none. Waitlist references apply to boat docks, not parking, so parking waitlist is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob access language such as keycard entry, fob access, electronic card readers, or card-controlled doors. The public remarks support general security features like gated access and guards, but not a card-based access system.
Security guard service is strongly supported for Colony at the Peninsula. Across the remarks, well over a dozen listings explicitly reference security with phrases like "24-hour security," "24/7 security," "security patrol," "roaming security guards," and "live security." This matches the historical MLS pattern (16/20 listings with SECGUA) and appears consistent across multiple agents, not just one repeated description.
The listings repeatedly confirm patrol-based security service at the property. This is supported by direct phrases such as 24-hour patrol, roaming security, and security patrol.
No analysis available
Central AC is strongly supported across the remarks, with explicit mentions in many listings from multiple agents. The wording is consistent and specific—e.g. "central air conditioning," "central AC," "new Central A/C," and "brand new HVAC system"—which aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS data. This does not look like a copy-paste error; the feature is repeatedly and independently confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears likely based on the MLS pattern rather than the remarks. 16 of 20 current listings mark CONCRE, while the remarks mostly focus on upgrades and amenities and rarely mention construction type directly.
Double wall construction is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 17 of 20 current listings showing DOUWAL. The remarks rarely mention it explicitly, suggesting this is a consistent building-level MLS attribute rather than a copied remark phrase.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco appears in a minority of current MLS records, with 4 of 20 listings including MASSTU. None of the public remarks explicitly mention masonry or stucco construction, so there is no direct narrative confirmation. This could reflect inconsistent agent entry rather than a universally stated building trait.
Steel frame construction is directly supported by the public remarks, not just the MLS checkbox data. One listing explicitly states "Fire Sprinklers-Steel Framing," which aligns with the current MLS pattern showing STEFRA in 10 of 20 listings.
Concrete slab construction is not supported by the public remarks, and only 3 of 20 MLS records currently indicate SLAB. That low frequency makes this look like inconsistent MLS entry rather than a confirmed building characteristic. Buyer-facing evidence is insufficient to treat the slab foundation as a reliable feature.
No analysis available
Only 1 of 20 current MLS listings marks 'wood frame' (WOOFRA) and the public remarks contain no references to 'wood frame'—several listings explicitly reference 'steel framing.' Given the lack of supporting remarks across many agents and no prior evidence that the building is wood‑framed, the weight of evidence indicates wood frame construction is unlikely for this building.
Only 5 of 20 current MLS records list ABOGRO and no public remarks explicitly state the building is an 'above ground construction' (mentions of "ground-floor" refer to unit location). Given the weak and inconsistent MLS checkbox presence and lack of explicit remarks, there is insufficient evidence to assert above-ground construction for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases indicating short-term rental permission, such as STR allowed, NUC, TVU, vacation rental, or 30-day minimum rules. Nothing in the public remarks references short-term rental eligibility for this building. Because there is no evidence of STR allowance, I marked it as false.
I searched for hotel pool, managed-by-hotel, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, and similar program language and found none. Since STR is not supported in the remarks, this must also be false.
I looked for wording such as required participation, must rent, cannot opt out, or mandatory pool membership and found nothing. Because there is no evidence of a hotel rental program or STR allowance, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold/ground lease language, lease expiry terms, and renewal dates such as 'lease expires' or 'renewed through.' Nothing in the public remarks gives a specific lease-end year. Because there is no explicit leasehold expiration information, this remains unknown.
Public remarks directly and repeatedly confirm VA loan approval for this building. I found no conflicting remarks, so this is a strong building-level match.
The remarks provide direct evidence that the building is fully insured, including an explicit statement that the building is fully insured. I did not find contradictory language suggesting partial or limited coverage.
Fire sprinkler coverage is strongly supported for this building. Historical MLS data shows 13/20 listings with the FIRSPR amenity, and current remarks explicitly confirm it with phrases like 'sprinklered for fire protection' and 'Fire Sprinklers.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and does not look like a one-off copy/paste error.
I searched the public remarks for direct fire/life safety approval language and did not find any. One listing mentions the building is "sprinklered for fire protection," but that is not the same as a passed FLSE or fire inspection, so it does not confirm this feature.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across many listings, not just one agent, with multiple units described as having "mountain views," "Ko'olau Mountain range" views, and "Koolau" or "Mariner's Ridge" vistas. Several remarks also pair mountain views with marina, ocean, Koko Head, or Diamond Head views, indicating this is a real building-level feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, there are no references to city, downtown, urban, or cityscape views. The listings focus on marina, mountain, Koko Head, Diamond Head, ocean, and garden views instead, so this appears to be a reliable negative.
No listing explicitly describes coastline, shoreline, or coastal views. While a few remarks mention ocean views or marina/ocean combinations, that is not the same as a coastline view, so this looks like a likely MLS checkbox error.
Garden/courtyard/landscaped views are strongly supported across the listings. Current remarks mention "beautifully landscaped grounds," "courtyard level," "expansive garden, palm tree" views, and units overlooking grassy or green-space areas. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste remark, so view_garden should be included.
No analysis available
Marina views are mentioned frequently across the remarks, with phrases like "views of the marina," "marina-front walking path," "marina views," "marina water views," and "marina-front community." The feature is supported by many independent listings and is one of the building’s clearest view attributes.
Several listings (a handful of units) explicitly mention sunrise or morning sun — examples include "sunrise views of Koko Head" and "enjoy your mornings in the sunlit breakfast nook." The feature appears in multiple unit remarks, indicating some units in the building offer sunrise/eastern exposure, though mentions are fewer than mountain or garden references.
Sunset views are supported by multiple independent listing remarks, not just MLS checkboxes. At least 7 listings explicitly reference sunset/evening viewing or western exposure, with phrases such as "sunset views," "dramatic sunsets views," and "perfect for morning coffee or sunset views." Current MLS data still shows some SUNSET flags, so this remains a strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
I searched for direct references to watching Friday night fireworks from a lanai, window, or unit. The remarks mention marina, mountain, Koko Head, and ocean views, but nothing indicates a fireworks view from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for an on-site resident manager is moderate. Multiple remarks mention an 'on-site management office' and 'incredible staff w/ on-site management office,' which suggests on-property management even though the exact phrase 'resident manager' is not used. This looks like repeated building-level copy across many listings rather than a single isolated mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.