Colonnade on the Greens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Colonnade on the Greens
Building Overview
Colonnade on the Greens in Aiea — concrete building (1976) with pool and fitness center. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Colonnade on the Greens
Based on MLS data, Colonnade on the Greens is a residential building located in Aiea, built in 1976 with concrete construction. Specific unit sizes and counts are not provided in the available MLS summary.
According to available records, building amenities include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. Listed views from the property include ocean, mountain, and sunset aspects.
MLS data indicate parking is available, covered, assigned, and there is guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, fees, and availability with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit percentages like "80% owner occupied" or strong descriptors such as "majority owner occupied." The remarks only provide scattered references to individual owner-occupants and general mentions of owners and tenants, which are not enough to estimate a building-wide owner-occupancy rate. Because no percentage is stated, the value remains unknown.
I searched for direct count wording such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators," but found none. The listings confirm elevator access is present or referenced, yet they never state how many elevators the building has. Because this is a numeric field and no count appears in the remarks, the value remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is strongly supported at the building level. The MLS data shows CABTV in 18 of 20 listings, and several remarks explicitly state "Cable" or "basic cable" is included in the maintenance fees. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a copy-paste one-off.
Common-area electricity appears likely included based mainly on MLS checkbox data. It shows up in 14 of 20 listings, which is enough for moderate confidence, but the public remarks do not provide direct confirmation. This feels like a building-level MLS pattern rather than a clearly described feature in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is strongly supported. Several remarks explicitly say "hot water" or "Maintenance Fee includes Hot Water," and the MLS data also shows HOTWAT in 13 of 20 listings. The single WTRHTR occurrence is not enough to outweigh the repeated inclusion evidence.
Internet inclusion is very strongly supported at the building level. The MLS data shows INTSER in 16 of 20 listings, and several remarks explicitly say "Cable, Internet" or similar phrasing is included in the monthly fees. This is consistent across many listings and agents.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported across the listings. The MLS data shows SEWER in 17 of 20 listings, and multiple remarks explicitly reference sewer being included in the monthly fees. This is consistent and high-confidence building-level evidence.
Water inclusion is strongly supported at the building level. The MLS data shows WATER in 17 of 20 listings, and several remarks explicitly note water is included in the HOA or maintenance fees. The repeated mentions make this very high confidence.
BBQ/grilling amenities are one of the most consistently reported features in the remarks. Dozens of listings mention BBQ areas or gas BBQ grills, strongly confirming a shared building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are repeatedly confirmed across the listings. Remarks use phrases like 'car wash area,' 'carwash area,' and 'car wash station,' which strongly supports the feature.
Clubhouse evidence is weaker than most other amenities, but it is still supported indirectly by several remarks referencing a 'community center,' meeting room, or pool cabana with kitchenette. The MLS checkbox appears inconsistently used, so this is a moderate-confidence inclusion.
No analysis available
The building clearly has a pet area/dog park, with many listings using direct language like "dog park," "small dog park," "fenced dog park," and "dog run area." The repeated wording across agents strongly supports this as a true community amenity.
No analysis available
Exercise facilities are consistently confirmed across the building. Multiple listings mention 'exercise room,' 'fitness center,' 'gym,' and 'fitness rooms,' showing strong cross-agent consistency rather than a one-off copy-paste.
No analysis available
Meeting room access is strongly supported. Several listings explicitly mention a "meeting room," "recreation/meeting room," or similar phrasing, and the MLS data is consistently checked. This appears to be a real shared amenity in the building.
Very strong evidence that the building offers patio/deck-type outdoor spaces. At least 20 separate remark blocks mention a lanai, balcony, covered lanai, patio, or outdoor space, often describing it as large, covered, or with golf course/ocean views. The repeated references across many listings and agents look consistent, not like a one-off copy-paste error.
Walking and jogging paths are clearly supported by the remarks. Multiple listings reference 'walking/jogging path' or 'walking paths,' making this a reliable shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Putting green access is repeatedly confirmed in the listings. It appears in many amenity lists, often alongside tennis, pool, and exercise facilities, indicating a standard shared amenity.
Recreation area/space is repeatedly supported across listings. The remarks describe shared recreational spaces in multiple ways, including 'recreation areas' and 'open recreational space,' which is strong building-level evidence.
Recreation-room style space is well supported by the remarks. Several agents describe a recreation room, game room, or recreation/meeting room with pool and ping pong, indicating a shared amenity rather than a unit-specific feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is one of the most consistently verified amenities in the dataset. Numerous listings explicitly mention sauna(s), often paired with pool, fitness, and recreation amenities.
Strong evidence the building offers storage units/lockers. Dozens of remarks mention it directly across multiple listings, including phrases like "extra storage," "storage locker," "deeded storage," "assigned storage locker," and "each unit has an 80 c.f. storage locker." This appears consistent across many agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
This feature is directly confirmed in the remarks. Multiple listings explicitly name surfboard storage or surfboard racks, so this is a clear yes.
Tennis courts are repeatedly confirmed throughout the listings. The feature appears alongside other shared amenities in many remarks, making it highly reliable.
There is no remark-level support for a trash chute system in the current listings, only references to trash service. Given the low historical support and lack of explicit mention across many remarks, this is a high-confidence correction to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/hot tub/spa amenities are clearly present, with listings using terms like "whirlpool," "hot tub," "jacuzzi," and "hot whirlpool." The repeated mentions across many remarks make this a strong, confirmed community feature.
Pool is strongly confirmed for Colonnade on the Greens. The remarks mention it in a very large number of listings, often alongside other resort-style amenities, with phrases like "swimming pool," "pool," and "large swimming pool." This appears consistent across multiple agents and is not just a copied checkbox.
Heated pool is strongly supported by the remarks and historical MLS amenity data. Multiple listings explicitly state "heated pool" or "heated swimming pool," often in the amenities section, indicating this is a shared building amenity. The evidence is repeated across numerous remarks and does not appear to be an isolated agent error.
I searched the remarks for 'saltwater pool,' 'salt pool,' and related terms. The pool is mentioned many times, but it is only described as heated, swimming, or whirlpool/jacuzzi with no indication that it is salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the current listing remarks and MLS data. I found explicit mentions in many listings, including phrases like "in-unit washer/dryer," "washer and dryer in unit," "full size washer/dryer," and "in-unit W/D." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the current MLS inclusion pattern (18/20 listings).
No analysis available
I looked for any public remarks indicating paid shared laundry, including coin-op, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees. The listings consistently mention in-unit washer/dryers instead, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for explicit references to community laundry facilities on each floor, such as 'laundry on every floor' or 'laundry room on every floor.' The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryers, so there is no public evidence for this feature.
Parking is clearly a building-level feature at Colonnade on the Greens. Across the remarks, many listings mention “2 assigned parking stalls,” “covered parking,” “dedicated spot,” and “parking garage,” which aligns with the current MLS data showing parking in all listings. The evidence is consistent across many agents and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
Assigned/reserved parking is well supported for this building. Multiple remarks explicitly state “two assigned parking stalls,” “one assigned covered parking stall,” and “deeded/assigned” stalls, indicating this is a recurring building feature rather than an isolated listing detail. The current MLS checkboxes reinforce the remarks and suggest broad building-level availability.
Strong building-level evidence supports covered parking. Numerous current listings mention "covered parking stalls," "1 covered parking stall," "two covered parking stalls," "assigned covered/end parking," and "parking garage," indicating covered parking is a real and recurring feature in the building. The consistency across many listings suggests this is reliable rather than checkbox noise.
There is direct public evidence that deeded parking exists in this building. Several remarks use the word deeded for parking stalls, which is the clearest indicator possible.
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee language, monthly parking rental, or extra parking cost details. The remarks repeatedly mention assigned, covered, dedicated, and included parking stalls, but do not state any separate monthly parking fee.
Guest parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. Dozens of references across the listings mention “ample guest parking,” “generous amounts of guest parking,” and “lots of guest parking,” showing this is a common and recognized amenity at Colonnade on the Greens. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
Multiple listings and MLS flags indicate secured entry: 12 of 20 MLS records show SECENT and many remarks state "gated community", "24/7 security", "guard-gated entry" or "security guard at the gate" (e.g., "gated community, complete with two side-by-side parking stalls", "staffed guard-gated entry"). Evidence is consistent across agents and aligns with historical data that the complex has secured entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or joining a waitlist for parking and found none. The listings instead emphasize ample guest parking and assigned stalls, so there is no public-remarks evidence that a parking waitlist exists.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob-based access language such as 'key card access,' 'fob entry,' or 'card reader.' The public remarks consistently reference gated and secured entry with guards, but do not explicitly describe a card or fob access system.
Security guard service is extremely well supported for Colonnade on the Greens. Across the provided remarks, dozens of listings explicitly mention '24-hour security,' '24/7 security,' 'security guard,' 'guard-gated entry,' or a 'manned 24/7' entrance, which strongly suggests this is a consistent building amenity rather than copy-paste noise. This aligns with the prior MLS pattern of 19/20 listings showing SECGUA.
The remarks support an active security presence beyond a static gate. In particular, the reference to a guard 'roving the grounds' indicates patrol service, reinforced by repeated 24-hour security language across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, I found no explicit split AC evidence. Mentions were limited to 'window a/c unit,' 'window AC,' or 'in-unit living room AC,' which indicates cooling exists but not necessarily ductless mini-splits. Because only 1 of 20 current MLS records checks the ACSPL inclusion and the remarks do not support it, this feature should be treated as absent for now.
Window AC is explicitly mentioned in multiple current remarks, not just the MLS checkbox data. At least 2 listings clearly call out window or living-room AC, while the broader historical MLS pattern shows ACWIUN appearing in about 11 of 20 current listings. The evidence looks consistent across different agents and is strong enough to keep this feature included.
Concrete construction is strongly supported. All 20 current listings identify the building with CONCRE, and none of the remarks contradict that. This appears to be consistent building-level data rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Five of 20 current MLS listings checked 'double wall' in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks mention 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' Given some units/listings indicate it exists but broad confirmation is lacking, the feature is included with moderate confidence as possibly present in some units.
No analysis available
Evidence for masonry/stucco is weak. While 5 of 20 current MLS entries include MASSTU, the remarks across many listings do not describe masonry or stucco construction. This looks more like partial or copied MLS data than a reliably verified building feature.
No analysis available
Slab construction is plausible and likely for this building, but the MLS support is limited. Only 2 of 20 current listings explicitly mark SLAB, and the remarks do not provide direct confirmation. This is a moderate-confidence inference rather than a fully explicit verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction is not supported by the remarks. Only 3 of 20 current listings include ABOGRO, and there is no consistent public language confirming it. This suggests the MLS field is likely unreliable for this building.
Brick construction is not supported by the remarks and appears only in 1 of 20 current MLS entries. No listing descriptions mention brick exterior, brick-and-mortar, or similar language, so the single checkbox is likely agent noise or a copy/paste error. Confidence is high that brick is not a reliable building feature here.
No analysis available
I searched for STR-specific wording such as short-term rental allowed, STR permitted, TVU, NUC, vacation rental, or 30-day minimum rules, but found nothing. With no public-remarks evidence supporting STR use, this is best treated as not allowed based on the available information.
Because the remarks do not support short-term rentals at all, the building cannot be identified as participating in a hotel rental pool from these listings. I also found no hotel-brand or managed-pool language.
I searched for mandatory-pool wording such as required participation, cannot opt out, or must rent, and found nothing. With no evidence of STR or a hotel pool program, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold/ground-lease language such as lease expiry, lease expires, ground lease ends, or renewed through a specific year, but found nothing. Since no year-specific lease-end information appears in the public remarks, the expiry year remains unknown.
The public remarks repeatedly advertise assumable VA loans, which is strong evidence that VA financing is accepted in this building. This appears in many separate listings, so confidence is very high.
I searched for insurance-specific phrases indicating the HOA fully insures the building or provides walls-in coverage. The remarks discuss amenities, security, repairs, and HOA-related items, but nothing about building insurance coverage. With no evidence in the remarks, this feature is not confirmed.
There is no public-remarks support for a fire sprinkler system across the listings reviewed. Instead, multiple remarks reference re-piping and fire alarm projects, but not sprinklers or a sprinkler system, while only 2 of 20 current MLS listings have FIRSPR checked. The pattern suggests weak, possibly copy-pasted MLS data rather than verified building features.
I looked for direct language like "fire/life safety evaluation passed," "FLSE passed," or "passed fire inspection." The remarks only describe fire alarm system repairs and completion of a fire alarm project, which is related but not the same as a formal pass. Based on the public remarks alone, I cannot confirm a pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention ocean or partial ocean views, often alongside golf course and Pearl Harbor views, indicating this is a real building-level offering rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Mountain views are one of the most consistently documented features in the remarks, with around 9 current listings referencing mountains directly. Multiple independent descriptions mention "mountains," "Ko'olau Mountains," and "sunrise colors over the mountains," supporting a real building-level offering. This appears well-established rather than agent error.
No analysis available
City views are present in a meaningful subset of units. The evidence is less universal than golf course views, but multiple remarks explicitly reference city or urban-facing views, supporting inclusion.
Coastline views are supported by multiple listings, though less consistently than golf course views. The remarks include direct references to coastline and coastal views, so this should be retained as an available building feature.
Garden-style views appear to be present in some units/buildings at Colonnade on the Greens. While not every listing states it explicitly, 8 of 20 MLS records include GARDEN in the view field and several remarks describe "lush landscaped grounds," "lush golf course landscape," and scenic green surroundings. The evidence looks building-wide rather than a one-off copy-paste claim, but it is still moderate rather than overwhelming.
Golf course views are a defining feature of the building. Dozens of listings mention them, often in direct, detailed language, making this the strongest-supported feature in the dataset.
A small number of listings (2/20 in current view_descriptions) mention marina/harbor-type views; remarks include phrases like "ocean, and marina" and repeated references to Pearl Harbor/harbor views. Because some units explicitly mention harbor/marina views, the building offers marina/harbor-view units, though the evidence is limited to a few listings.
Sunrise exposure/views are repeatedly mentioned in the listings, with about 7 current remarks explicitly referencing sunrise or morning sun. Examples include "sunrise colors over the mountains" and "morning sun from your lanai," which is strong direct evidence. This feature appears legitimate for the building.
Sunset views are present in a meaningful subset of listings, though fewer than the other view types. Roughly 4 current remarks explicitly mention sunset or evening sunset views, including phrases like "sunset views from your private lanai" and "evening sunsets." The evidence is solid but less widespread than ocean, mountain, or sunrise views.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'fireworks view from unit,' 'watch fireworks from the lanai,' or similar wording. The remarks mention golf course, ocean, Pearl Harbor, sunrise, and mountain views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is strongly supported across the dataset. Multiple listings explicitly mention a resident manager with phrases such as "resident manager/office," "resident manager on premises," and "On-Site Manager," indicating this is not just a copied checkbox but a real on-site role. The evidence is consistent across many agents and aligns with the high historical MLS confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.