Coconut Plantation
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Coconut Plantation
Building Overview
Coconut Plantation in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale — built 2002; features pool and central air conditioning.
About Coconut Plantation
Coconut Plantation is a residential building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 2002 and uses a combination of concrete, steel frame, and wood frame construction. MLS data does not provide unit size or total number of units.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool, fitness center, and BBQ area. The property lists a resident manager and security guard, and units are noted to have central air conditioning. The building also offers sunset views according to the records provided.
Parking is listed as available with covered, assigned, and guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS information. The management company is recorded as unknown. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees, rules, and availability with the seller or managing agent.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and qualitative phrases like "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied," but found nothing. The remarks emphasize resort-style living, rentals, and investor use, but they do not provide an owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as a number of elevators or wording like "multiple elevators," but found none. The listings describe two-story townhomes and ground-floor units, which do not provide evidence of an elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable is well supported for this building. The current MLS data shows CABTV in 14/20 listings, and several remarks explicitly list "cable" among the included HOA fees. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Common-area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fees based on strong MLS checkbox support: 17 of 20 listings have OTCOEX. The public remarks do not directly mention common electric, so this is driven mainly by the MLS pattern rather than explicit narrative confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. The MLS pattern is strongly opposite of inclusion, with only 1/20 listings showing HOTWAT and most showing WTRHTR, and the remarks do not describe building-supplied hot water. This is a high-confidence correction to false.
Internet is supported as an included HOA expense. The current MLS data shows INTSER in 12/20 listings, and several remarks explicitly list "WiFi" or "internet" as part of the fees. The repeated wording across listings suggests this is a genuine building-level amenity.
No analysis available
Sewer is clearly included in the maintenance fees. The current MLS data shows SEWER in 19/20 listings, and public remarks repeatedly mention sewer as included. This is highly consistent and not likely to be a checkbox artifact.
Water is included in the maintenance fees. The current MLS history shows WATER in 19/20 listings, and multiple remarks explicitly state that water is part of the HOA or maintenance fee. This is one of the strongest-confirmed features for the building.
BBQ/grilling amenities are strongly supported across the listing set. Multiple remarks mention "BBQ areas," "BBQ space," "BBQ grills," and one notes "one of the few homes ... to allow a BBQ on your lanai," indicating the feature is real rather than a copy-paste checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clubhouse/community-center type amenities are supported by multiple remarks, including explicit uses of "clubhouse," "private recreation center," and "recreation center." The evidence is not as universal as some other features, but it is repeated enough across listings to include.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Exercise/fitness amenities are strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'fitness center,' 'gym,' 'workout station,' and 'fitness access,' and the evidence appears repeatedly across different agents rather than a single copied description.
No analysis available
Meeting-room evidence is moderate rather than explicit. Several listings mention a 'clubhouse for special events,' 'rec centers,' or a private recreation center, which could function as a meeting room/community room, but the wording is less direct than for other amenities.
Strong building-level evidence that Coconut Plantation offers patio/deck-style outdoor spaces. Across many current listings, agents consistently mention features like “private lanai,” “covered lanai,” “front cozy patio,” “private back porch,” and “covered patios,” indicating this is a common amenity rather than a one-off unit feature. The remarks align with the historical MLS checkbox pattern and suggest broad, repeated usage across listings.
Walking/jogging paths are very well supported in both MLS data and remarks. Listings repeatedly reference "walking paths," "scenic walking paths," and "miles of walking paths," making this one of the clearest amenities in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I found no public remark evidence supporting a putting green in this building/community. With only 1/20 current MLS listings showing PUTGRE and no corroborating remarks, this looks like a likely mistaken checkbox or an unrelated nearby feature rather than a building amenity.
Recreation-area support is consistent across many listings. Remarks explicitly cite a "luxury pool area with recreation and BBQ spaces," "recreation areas," and "2 rec centers," so this appears to be a genuine shared amenity.
Recreation-room type space is moderately supported. While the listings do not always say "recreation room" verbatim, several remarks reference "private recreation center," "2 rec centers," and similar shared amenity spaces, suggesting a real community feature.
The remarks do not support a restaurant as a building amenity. They repeatedly reference nearby dining, redevelopment with future restaurants, or restaurants just outside the community, which points to adjacency rather than an in-building dining facility.
No analysis available
There is no explicit sauna evidence in the public remarks. Listings consistently discuss spas, hot tubs, whirlpools, and fitness amenities, but none mention a sauna, steam room, or similar facility. Given the lack of supporting language across many remarks, sauna appears unsupported in the public data.
Storage units/extra storage appear to be a real building feature across multiple Coconut Plantation listings, not just a one-off agent checkbox. Current remarks mention it in several different units and forms—"hidden storage," "storage and shelving," "concealed storage area," and "enhanced storage options"—which supports that storage is available in the building or in some units. The evidence looks consistent across multiple listings and agents rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
I looked for surfboard storage, surf storage, board storage, and related amenity descriptions. The listings mention garages, hidden storage, closets, and beach toys/paddleboards, but nothing indicating dedicated surfboard storage.
Tennis courts are strongly corroborated by the listing remarks and the MLS amenities. Multiple descriptions mention 'tennis courts' directly, often alongside pickleball and fitness club access, suggesting this is a real shared resort amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/hot tub/spa amenities are clearly present. Remarks frequently cite "3 hot tubs," "jacuzzies," "spas," and "hidden spa," confirming the MLS checkbox data with direct descriptive evidence.
Pool access is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly mention shared amenities such as "2 pools and 3 jacuzzies," "swimming pool," "resort-style amenities including pools," and "a luxury pool area," which appears consistent and building-level. The evidence is broad across many agents and aligns with the MLS checkbox data.
There is no explicit mention in the public remarks of a heated swimming pool. While 3 of 20 MLS amenity checkboxes list HEAPOO, none of the listings' remarks say "heated pool"; most remarks instead mention "pools", "spas/hot tubs" or "warm protected ocean." Given absence of explicit mentions across remarks and sparse MLS checkbox presence, heated pool status is unconfirmed and likely not a guaranteed building-level amenity.
I searched for salt water pool, saltwater pool, salt pool, and saline pool language. The remarks mention pools, spas, hot tubs, and jacuzzies, but do not identify any of them as saltwater.
There is overwhelming evidence that this building offers in-unit laundry. Multiple current remarks explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit or include it as part of the home, and the historical MLS data shows 19 of 20 listings include washer/dryer in inclusions. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for coin laundry, paid laundry, laundry fees, card-operated machines, and coin-op wording. The listings reference in-unit washer/dryer and a dedicated laundry area in one unit, but nothing suggests a paid shared laundry facility.
I looked for explicit references to laundry rooms on each floor, shared laundry by level, or floor-by-floor laundry access. The remarks only mention in-unit laundry, a dedicated laundry in the studio, or washers/dryers, so there is no evidence that the building has community laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly available across the building. Current remarks explicitly mention features like "1 car garage + golf cart garage + 1 stall," "guest stalls too," "2 car garage," "attached garage," and "assigned open parking space." The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to be repeatedly confirmed by different agents, not just a single copy-paste note.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the remarks and historical MLS data. Multiple listings explicitly mention an "additional deeded parking stall," "1 assigned open parking space," and a "reserved stall directly in front," indicating this is a building-level feature available to buyers. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste.
Covered parking is overwhelmingly supported. Nearly every remark references some form of garage or covered/enclosed parking, including "2-car garage," "attached garage," "enclosed 2-car garage," and "garage plus golf cart garage." This aligns with the MLS data showing covered parking in all listings, so confidence is very high.
The remarks explicitly state that the property includes "an additional deeded parking stall," which is direct evidence that parking is deeded. I also looked for related wording like owned stall or parking included, and the deeded reference is clear and sufficient.
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee language such as monthly parking charges, parking rental costs, or additional stall fees. The remarks mention parking stalls and garages, but no explicit monthly fee was stated.
Guest parking is well supported by both MLS data and remarks. The clearest evidence is the explicit phrase "Guest stalls too," with additional references to extra parking spaces and driveway stalls in other listings. This suggests guest parking is a shared building feature, not just an isolated unit amenity.
Secured entry is well supported for this community. Multiple remarks call it a "gated community," "secure gated resort neighborhood," or "secure gated community," and the MLS data shows 10/20 listings with secured-entry codes. This is consistent across many agents and listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like parking waitlist, waiting list, or join the waitlist for parking. There is no evidence in the remarks that parking operates with a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for key card access, fob access, card readers, and other electronic access-control wording. The listings consistently say the community is gated or secure, but that is not the same as card/fob access and no such system is explicitly mentioned.
Security guard service appears to be present, though not uniformly mentioned across listings. Out of 20 listings, 8 currently have the SECGUA amenity checked, and one remark explicitly says "24-hour security" alongside a resident manager. Most other remarks use general language like "gated" or "secure gated community," which suggests the amenity may be real but is inconsistently copied into MLS remarks.
I searched for security patrol, roving security, patrolled building, and similar wording. The remarks mention gated access, resident manager, and 24-hour security in one listing, but not patrol service specifically.
No analysis available
Central air conditioning is strongly supported across the building. About 10+ current remarks explicitly mention it, and the historical MLS data is even stronger, with 19/20 listings checking central AC-related fields. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and listings, not just copy-paste, and includes details about replacement or upgrades in several units.
There is no meaningful evidence that the building offers split/mini-split AC. Across the remarks reviewed, the feature is never described, while MLS data shows only 1 of 20 listings with an ACSPL inclusion, which is too weak to support a building-level feature. This appears more likely to be an outlier or agent input error than a real building characteristic.
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears moderately supported by the MLS, with 10 of 20 current listings marked CONCRE. None of the public remarks explicitly say “concrete,” so this is not remark-confirmed, but the repeated MLS pattern suggests it is likely a real building feature rather than a one-off agent entry.
Double-wall construction is moderately indicated by the MLS, with 12 of 20 listings marked DOUWAL. No remarks explicitly describe “double wall” or “two walls,” so this appears to be MLS-driven rather than remark-confirmed, but the repeated presence across many listings makes it plausible for the building.
No analysis available
Only 1 of 20 MLS listings lists masonry/stucco (MASSTU) and none of the public remarks mention masonry or stucco. The single checkbox entry appears isolated and is not corroborated by agent remarks, so there is low confidence that masonry/stucco construction is a building feature.
Steel frame construction is strongly supported at the building level by the MLS pattern, with 17 of 20 current listings marked STEFRA. The public remarks do not explicitly mention the framing system, but the breadth of the current checkbox data suggests this is a consistent building feature rather than a one-off agent error.
There are no explicit remarks describing a concrete slab foundation, and the public descriptions focus on unit layout and renovations rather than foundation type. With only 10/20 current listings marked SLAB and no textual confirmation, this feature remains unverified from the remarks.
No analysis available
MLS data shows 13 of 20 listings listing wood frame (WOOFRA). No public remark specifically calls out 'wood frame construction', so this is an implied/medium-confidence inclusion based on multiple agent-entered MLS records rather than explicit remark confirmation.
Above-ground construction has moderate building-level support in the MLS data, with 12 of 20 current listings marked ABOGRO. The remarks repeatedly describe upstairs residences, two-story townhomes, and ground-floor units, but they do not explicitly say the building is constructed above ground, so this is implied rather than directly confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks repeatedly confirm that 30-day rentals are allowed in this building/community. That meets the STR definition used here, so STR is supported with very high confidence.
I searched for hotel-pool terminology like hotel rental pool, hotel-managed, or branded resort pool participation. No public remark indicates this building participates in a hotel rental pool program.
I looked for language showing mandatory participation such as must rent through a program, cannot opt out, or required enrollment. The remarks describe STR as allowed, but nothing suggests that any rental pool participation is mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold/ground-lease language such as "lease expires," "renewed through," or a specific expiration year. Nothing in the public remarks indicates the land tenure type or any lease expiry date.
I found an explicit VA-related financing mention in the remarks. While this is not the same as a formal approval statement, it strongly suggests VA financing eligibility is available for the building based on public listing language.
Multiple listings indicate the HOA fees include insurance, and one specifically says fees include "building insurance." That is strong public-remark evidence that the community is fully insured / walls-in covered.
No analysis available
I looked for public-remark language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation, fire inspection, or similar life-safety certification, but there were no such mentions. Since this feature is only determined from remarks and none were provided, it is treated as not evidenced in the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views appear to be offered in some units, but they are not widespread across the building. Current MLS data shows 3 of 20 listings with MOUNTA, and at least one remark explicitly mentions "mountain" views alongside golf course and sunset views. This is enough to include the feature, though the evidence is lighter than for garden views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden-related views are strongly supported across the building and appear in multiple listings rather than a single agent remark. Current remarks explicitly mention "lush tropical garden views," "serene garden setting," "manicured tropical paradise," and "unobstructed garden views," confirming this is a real building-level offering rather than copy-paste noise.
Golf course views are very well documented across the building. Current remarks explicitly mention the 11th Fairway, 12th Fairway, 13th Fairway, 12th green, 13th tee, 10th fairway, and phrases like "golf course frontage" and "overlooking the golf course." This appears consistent across many listings and multiple agents rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
Moderate but explicit confirmation: one or more current public remarks explicitly cite 'sunrise' (for example, 'stunning ... sunrise and sunset views'), while many more mention sunsets. Given prior high confidence and at least one explicit contemporary remark, the building is reported to offer sunrise views for some units.
Sunset views are repeatedly mentioned in the public remarks, with several listings using direct language such as "sunset views," "gorgeous sunsets," "breathtaking sunset colors," and "sunset at the beach lagoons." The evidence is spread across multiple listings and appears to be genuine building-level view availability rather than a one-off marketing phrase.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit statements that units can see Friday night fireworks from the building or from lanais/windows. The remarks discuss sunsets, golf course views, lagoons, and resort amenities, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager appears to be a real building-level amenity with strong support: 17 of 20 MLS listings have RESMAN checked. One current remark explicitly lists a "resident manager" alongside other community amenities, which confirms the checkbox data rather than contradicting it. The evidence is consistent and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.