Cathedral Pt-Melemanu
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Cathedral Pt-Melemanu
Building Overview
Cathedral Pt-Melemanu in Mililani-Waipio, built 1973, concrete construction with pool and resident manager on site.
About Cathedral Pt-Melemanu
Cathedral Pt-Melemanu is located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1973 and is built of concrete. MLS data does not provide building square footage or unit count in the supplied information.
Key features based on MLS data include an on-site pool, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. The property advertises mountain and sunset views and is served by two elevators.
Additional details from MLS: parking is available, covered, assigned, and includes guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the provided data. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with the listing agent or property management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for direct owner-occupancy clues such as a percentage, 'mostly owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or similar wording. No such information appeared, so the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown from these listings.
Public remarks directly confirm that the building has two elevators. I did not find any conflicting remark stating a different elevator count, so the current value is strongly supported.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
At least four separate listings for Cathedral Point/Melemanu state that the monthly HOA or maintenance fees include cable, sometimes specifying 'cable with HBO' or grouping it with internet, water, and sewer. This aligns with prior MLS checkbox data (CABTV selected in 5/20 listings), supporting that building fees include cable service.
The evidence strongly supports maintenance fees including common area electricity. The MLS data shows OTCOEX in 17 of 20 listings, which is a strong building-level pattern, and no remarks contradict it. While the public remarks more often say "Other Common Elements" than naming electricity directly, the high MLS consistency makes this a reliable inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data shows 0 of 20 listings selecting HOTWAT, while 15 of 20 list WTRHTR, and remarks repeatedly reference individual unit water heaters (including tankless or new water heater installs). This is strong negative evidence against hot water being a building-paid amenity.
Clear evidence that internet is included: 9 of 20 MLS records list INTSER and multiple listings say 'maintenance fee includes internet Wi‑Fi', 'internet and cable', or similar. The language appears repeatedly across different agents' remarks, indicating building-level inclusion rather than a single erroneous entry.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is repeatedly confirmed across the building. The MLS data shows SEWER in 17 of 20 listings, and several remarks explicitly state "HOA fees cover water, sewer" or "Water, Sewer ... are included with the maintenance fee." This is strong, repeated evidence and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
Water is clearly included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data shows WATER in 16 of 20 listings, and numerous remarks explicitly say "water included," "HOA fees cover ... water," or "Water ... are included with the maintenance fee." The repeated wording across multiple listings supports a strong building-level feature.
BBQ is strongly supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention a "BBQ area" or "BBQ areas," alongside other shared amenities like the pool and recreation areas. The feature appears to be a genuine building/common-area amenity and is not just isolated copy-paste marketing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I did not find public-remarks support for a clubhouse or community center in the listing set. With only 1 of 20 MLS records checking the box and no corroborating remarks, this appears more likely to be an MLS error than a real shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across multiple listings that the building offers patios/decks: MLS amenities list PATDEC/COVPAT on 10 of 20 current listings and numerous public remarks mention 'lanai', 'covered lanai', 'private patio' or 'two lanais' (e.g., 'private lanai', 'large, covered lanai', 'two private lanais'). Mentions appear in many different agents' remarks rather than a single copy/paste instance, supporting high confidence that patio/deck amenities exist for multiple units.
The remarks refer to parks, walking trails, and outdoor recreation in the area, but not a dedicated jogging or walking path owned by the building. Because the MLS evidence is very sparse and unsupported by remarks, I would not treat this as a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is repeatedly described as having a recreation area or rec area. Several current listings use phrases like "community pool and rec area," "recreation space," and "recreation area," confirming the amenity across multiple remarks and agents. The evidence is consistent with the MLS data and strongly supports inclusion.
Current public remarks repeatedly mention a shared recreation/rec area (phrases include 'recreation area', 'rec area', 'recreation room' and 'recreation deck') even though the MLS amenity checkbox shows RECROO in only 1/20 listings. Multiple independent listing remarks reference the rec area alongside pool and other common amenities, indicating the building offers a shared recreation room/area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 public remarks clearly describe shared storage lockers or extra building storage, and the only MLS signal is a single one-off amenities checkbox. Most remarks instead reference unit closets, under-bed storage, or a bonus shed, which do not confirm a building-level storage unit amenity. Given the weak, copy-paste-prone MLS evidence and lack of supporting remarks, this feature is not validated.
I searched the remarks for surfboard-storage-related language such as 'surfboard storage,' 'board storage,' or 'bike and surfboard storage.' Nothing in the listings indicates any surf storage facility or amenity.
Dozens of remarks enumerate amenities like 'basketball & volleyball courts,' 'sports courts,' playgrounds, and parks, but not a single listing mentions a 'tennis court' or similar. With only 2 of 20 MLS records showing TENCOU and no textual support, the evidence points to there being no tennis court in this community, correcting likely MLS mis-checks.
Trash chute appears in a meaningful share of current MLS records (7/20), suggesting the building likely offers this amenity. No public remarks mention a trash chute, so the evidence is weaker than for BBQ and may reflect inconsistent MLS entry rather than repeated agent verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool access is strongly supported across the current remarks and MLS amenities. Dozens of listings mention it explicitly as a "community pool," "large swimming pool," or "huge swimming pool," often alongside other shared amenities like BBQ areas and recreation spaces. The evidence is consistent across many agents and unit types, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like saltwater pool, salt water pool, salt pool, or saline pool. The remarks confirm that the building/community has a pool, but they never specify that it is salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly confirmed for this building. Current remarks across many listings repeatedly mention it, including exact phrases such as "in-unit washer and dryer," "washer/dryer in the unit," "full-size washer and dryer," and "stacked washer and dryer." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, matching the MLS inclusions showing 20/20 listings with washer/dryer.
No analysis available
I searched for paid laundry wording such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees. Nothing in the remarks supports a paid community laundry setup, and the explicit in-unit laundry language points away from it.
I looked for any mention of laundry on each floor, floor-by-floor laundry rooms, or community laundry facilities. The public remarks consistently emphasize in-unit laundry and even state there are no shared laundry rooms, so there is no evidence for laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the building. Current remarks mention parking in dozens of listings, including phrases like "2 parking stalls," "assigned parking stall," "covered parking," "open parking," and "guest parking." This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Assigned/reserved parking is very well supported in the building. Many current remarks explicitly say "assigned parking stall," "1 assigned parking," "2 assigned parking stalls," or similar, often with location details like close to the unit or directly in front. The evidence is consistent across many listings and multiple agents, not just MLS checkbox data.
Covered parking is well supported by both MLS flags and remarks. Many listings explicitly say "covered parking," "1 covered & 1 uncovered," or "assigned covered parking stall," which confirms this is an available building feature, though not necessarily in every unit.
The remarks provide direct evidence that parking is deeded with the unit. I also saw multiple references to assigned and covered stalls, but the clearest confirmation is the explicit deeded-parking statement.
No analysis available
I looked for any separate monthly parking charge, parking rental fee, or added cost for parking. The remarks repeatedly mention assigned, covered, uncovered, and guest parking, but none state a monthly fee for parking. With no explicit fee disclosed, this remains unknown.
Guest parking appears to be a genuine building amenity. Several independent remarks call out "guest parking" or "plenty of guest parking," which aligns with the MLS data and suggests the feature is shared at the building level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a list for parking. The listings describe parking stalls and guest parking availability, but there is no indication of a waitlist system. Absent any mention, this is treated as not evidenced in the public remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for key card, fob access, card reader, or electronic entry language and found none. Because the current building context includes a security guard and the remarks mention security patrol/guard, I am keeping the feature true, but only at low confidence since there is no evidence of card-based access.
Security service is strongly supported across the listing remarks. Several listings explicitly mention 'regular security patrol,' '24 hour security patrol,' 'on-site security,' and 'security guard,' and the current MLS amenities also show SECGUA checked on many listings. The repeated mentions across multiple agents make this a high-confidence building feature.
The remarks repeatedly and directly confirm patrol service, which is strong evidence for this feature. This is consistent across multiple listings and does not rely on inference.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple current listings explicitly reference AC, including phrases like "A/C," "New A/C window units installed in the living room and primary bedroom," "window AC units in each room," and "2 Split AC." Combined with the prior high-confidence MLS indicator, this is strong evidence that the building has units with window air conditioning (and related AC types) available. The pattern appears across several listings from different remarks, not just a single copy-paste mention.
Concrete construction is strongly supported. Current MLS data shows 20 of 20 listings marked CONCRE, and at least one remark explicitly says the buildings underwent a "complete concrete spalling & seal/paint project in 2021." This appears consistent across the listings and not just a copy-paste checkbox issue.
There is limited evidence for double-wall construction. No listing remarks mention 'double wall' or equivalent phrasing, and the MLS tag appears only sporadically (5 of 20), which may indicate inconsistent agent entry rather than verified building construction. I am keeping it as a weak positive based on MLS coding only.
No public remarks mention hollow tile construction, while multiple listings reference concrete-focused maintenance such as spalling work. With only 4 of 20 listings currently coded as hollow tile and no supporting remarks, this appears more likely to be MLS checkbox drift or copy/paste error than a reliable building feature. Confidence is moderate-high that hollow tile should not be treated as a confirmed construction feature here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Weak evidence: 6 of 20 MLS records identify slab foundation but none of the public remarks explicitly reference a "concrete slab" or slab foundation. Without corroborating remarks or owner/site verification, the presence of slab foundations is possible for some units but remains uncertain.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no remark-based confirmation for above-ground construction. The only support is sparse MLS coding (3 of 20 listings tagged ABOGRO), which looks more like inconsistent checkbox usage than verified building information. Because there is not enough evidence to safely overturn it, I am leaving it as a very low-confidence positive.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, NUC, TVU, vacation rental language, or a 30-day minimum rule. The remarks mention investor potential and long-term tenant occupancy, but nothing suggests short-term rentals are allowed. With no explicit allowance found, this is marked false based on absence of evidence.
I searched for hotel-rental-pool language such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, hotel-managed, or similar program references. Nothing in the remarks suggests the building participates in a hotel rental pool.
I looked for wording indicating mandatory participation, inability to opt out, or required rental program membership. No such language appears in the public remarks, so a mandatory pool is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as ground lease, land lease, lease expires, renewal, or an expiry year. Nothing in the listings indicates this building is leasehold or gives a lease expiration year. Since no specific year is mentioned, the value remains unknown.
The public remarks repeatedly confirm VA financing support for this building. I found several explicit references to VA-approved status and assumable VA loans, which is strong direct evidence.
Multiple remarks indicate the association carries full building insurance, including explicit wording that Cathedral Point is "100% hurricane-insured." This is strong public-remarks evidence for walls-in/full coverage insurance.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE passed, fire inspection passed, fire safety certified, and life safety compliant. Nothing in the listings states the building passed such an evaluation; instead, one remark references a special assessment for fire alarm system work, which suggests ongoing repairs rather than a completed pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that this building offers mountain-view units. At least a dozen remarks explicitly mention "mountain views," "mountain view," "majestic mountains," or similar wording, and multiple agents independently describe the same feature. The current MLS data also supports this, with 9/20 listings showing MOUNTA in the view description.
No analysis available
There is limited evidence that some units may offer city-type views. One remark explicitly mentions "lush greenery/mountains/city lights," and the MLS data shows 1/20 listings marked CITY, but the feature is not broadly repeated across remarks. This looks like a real but uncommon building-level view option rather than a consistently advertised feature.
No analysis available
Many current public remarks (approximately 12 listings) reference landscaped/greenery/park views: phrases include "views of lush greenery," "overlooks a nicely landscaped grassy garden area," "two lanais overlook a lush park," and "treetops." Evidence appears across multiple agents and listings rather than being isolated copy/paste, aligning with historical high confidence that the complex offers garden/landscaped views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Dozens of listings describe views (mountains, park, treetops, city lights, sunsets) but none mention sunrise, morning sun, or east-facing exposure. Because this feature is never called out despite extensive marketing language about views, it is not currently included as a confirmed building amenity.
Sunset views are strongly supported across multiple listings. At least 4 listings explicitly reference sunsets or evening sun, including phrases like "sunset views," "killer sunsets," "Sunsets are nice," and "take in the sunset from your 97 sqft lanai." While 6/20 current MLS view descriptions say NONE, the repeated public remarks across different agents indicate sunset views are a real building feature for some units, not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for direct fireworks-view language such as 'view of fireworks,' 'see fireworks from the unit,' or 'watch fireworks from the lanai.' The remarks mention mountain, park, garden, valley, and sunset views, but nothing indicating fireworks are visible from the property.
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports a resident manager on-site. Historical MLS data shows RESMAN checked in 13 of 20 listings, and current remarks explicitly say "on-site resident manager" / "resident manager" in at least one listing. The repeated mention across listings suggests a real building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.