Cathedral Pt-Melemanu
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Cathedral Pt-Melemanu
Building Overview
Cathedral Pt-Melemanu in Mililani-Waipio, built 1973, concrete construction with pool and resident manager on site.
About Cathedral Pt-Melemanu
Cathedral Pt-Melemanu is located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1973 and is built of concrete. MLS data does not provide building square footage or unit count in the supplied information.
Key features based on MLS data include an on-site pool, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. The property advertises mountain and sunset views and is served by two elevators.
Additional details from MLS: parking is available, covered, assigned, and includes guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the provided data. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with the listing agent or property management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for explicit percentages and descriptions such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." One unit is described as owner occupied, but that does not establish the percentage for the 222-unit building, so the value remains unknown.
The remarks directly confirm that the building has two elevators, matching the current value of 2. No conflicting elevator count was found in the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable inclusion is supported by the MLS data and repeated remarks. Several listings say maintenance fees cover "Cable" or "Cable TV," including one that spells out streaming/cable package details, which suggests this is a building-wide benefit rather than a one-off agent error.
Common-area expenses are supported by 16/20 current MLS listings and repeated remarks from multiple listing versions, including “common area upkeep,” “common expenses,” and “Other Common Elements.” The evidence is strong across the building and aligns with the previously high-confidence determination, although agents may be copying standardized fee descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No reviewed listing explicitly says that hot water is included in the HOA or maintenance fee. Instead, multiple listings reference individual water heaters, and the MLS consistently excludes HOTWAT while commonly including WTRHTR, strongly supporting a building-level value of false.
Internet inclusion is explicitly confirmed in multiple remarks and supported by current MLS data. Listings repeatedly state "internet," "high speed internet," or "internet Wi‑Fi" is covered, which is strong evidence that this building includes it in the HOA/maintenance fee.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is overwhelmingly supported by 19/20 current MLS listings and many explicit remarks from different marketing versions. Key phrases include “maintenance fees covers Water, Sewer” and “monthly HOA fees cover water, sewer,” confirming the previously high-confidence feature.
Water inclusion is strongly confirmed by 18/20 current MLS listings and repeated explicit remarks, including “HOA fees cover cable, internet, water, and sewer” and “Water, Sewer, and Trash Removal are included with the maintenance fee.” The consistency across many listings supports the previously high-confidence determination.
At least 9 of 20 listings include BBQ in the current amenities, with multiple remarks explicitly mentioning a “BBQ area” or “BBQ areas.” The repeated references across numerous listings and agents strongly confirm this as a building/community amenity rather than an isolated or copied checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I did not find public-remarks support for a clubhouse or community center in the listing set. With only 1 of 20 MLS records checking the box and no corroborating remarks, this appears more likely to be an MLS error than a real shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
More than 20 current remarks explicitly mention outdoor space, with key phrases including "private covered lanai," "spacious covered lanai," "two lanais—one covered and one open," "large lanai," and "private patio." Evidence is strong across numerous listings and agents, confirming that patio/deck-style outdoor spaces are a recurring building/unit feature rather than an isolated or copy-paste checkbox error.
The remarks refer to parks, walking trails, and outdoor recreation in the area, but not a dedicated jogging or walking path owned by the building. Because the MLS evidence is very sparse and unsupported by remarks, I would not treat this as a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The recreation area is strongly validated across the listing history and current remarks. At least 15 current listings explicitly mention a "recreation area," "rec area," "recreation space," or "recreation room," while others describe related shared amenities such as recreation courts or a recreational deck. The repeated descriptions across many listings and agents, together with previously high confidence, indicate this is a genuine building amenity rather than a checkbox copy-paste error.
Many current remarks identify a shared recreation facility, using phrases such as “recreation area,” “rec area,” and “recreation room”; the feature is confirmed in substantially more than one listing. This repeated cross-listing evidence supports including recreation_room, while the low current checkbox count appears to reflect incomplete MLS amenity tagging.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 public remarks clearly describe shared storage lockers or extra building storage, and the only MLS signal is a single one-off amenities checkbox. Most remarks instead reference unit closets, under-bed storage, or a bonus shed, which do not confirm a building-level storage unit amenity. Given the weak, copy-paste-prone MLS evidence and lack of supporting remarks, this feature is not validated.
I searched for "surfboard storage," "board storage," "surf storage," and "bike and surfboard storage." The remarks discuss nearby surfing and beaches but identify no building storage facility for surfboards.
Dozens of remarks enumerate amenities like 'basketball & volleyball courts,' 'sports courts,' playgrounds, and parks, but not a single listing mentions a 'tennis court' or similar. With only 2 of 20 MLS records showing TENCOU and no textual support, the evidence points to there being no tennis court in this community, correcting likely MLS mis-checks.
Trash chute is supported by current MLS checkbox data in 7 of 20 listings, which suggests the amenity likely exists somewhere in the building. However, the public remarks provided do not explicitly mention a trash chute, so this looks more like moderate MLS evidence than remark-backed confirmation. Because the feature is present in multiple current listings and there is no strong contradictory evidence, it should remain included for now.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool access is overwhelmingly supported across the listings: 20/20 current listings include pool-related MLS amenities, and numerous remarks from multiple listings explicitly mention a community or swimming pool. The repeated references include "large swimming pool," "community pool," "huge swimming pool," and pool access alongside shared recreation areas, strongly confirming this is a building/community amenity rather than copy-paste checkbox error.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," "salt pool," and "saline pool." Although the building's pool is repeatedly confirmed, there is no public-remarks evidence that it uses salt water.
In-unit laundry is overwhelmingly confirmed across the building: at least 18 of 20 current listings reference it, with repeated explicit phrases such as “full-size washer and dryer,” “washer/dryer in unit,” and “in-unit stacked washer and dryer.” The confirmations appear across many different unit descriptions and agents, including renovated and non-renovated units, strongly supporting this as a building-wide available feature rather than an isolated or copied claim.
No analysis available
The public remarks emphasize private in-unit laundry. I searched for references to coins, quarters, laundry fees, payment cards, or coin-operated facilities and found none.
The listings consistently describe washers and dryers inside the units rather than community laundry facilities. No remarks mention laundry rooms on every floor, and one listing explicitly says there are "no shared laundry rooms."
Parking is overwhelmingly supported across the building: all 20 current listings contain parking-related MLS features, and numerous remarks mention phrases such as "one assigned parking stall," "two parking stalls," "covered parking stall," and "two separate full-sized parking stalls." Evidence comes from many distinct listing descriptions and is consistent with the previously high-confidence conclusion.
Assigned parking is strongly confirmed across multiple listings, with well over 15 listings and many explicit phrases including "assigned parking stall," "one dedicated parking stall," "two assigned stalls," "one deeded parking," and "designated parking spaces." The repeated confirmations across different unit descriptions and agents support the previously high-confidence building feature.
Covered parking is well supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly say "covered parking stall," "1 covered & 1 uncovered," and "assigned and covered parking," with several units also describing parking located close to the unit or on the same level. This is consistent with the MLS data and appears genuinely supported by the building rather than a single agent's checkbox.
Direct public-remarks evidence confirms that at least one unit has deeded parking. Repeated references to assigned, covered, and included stalls further support that deeded parking exists in the building, though not necessarily for every unit.
No analysis available
The remarks repeatedly describe assigned, covered, uncovered, guest, and street parking. However, they do not state a monthly parking fee, parking rental charge, or other recurring parking cost.
Guest parking is supported by at least four explicit public remarks, including "guest parking also available," "plus guest parking," "plenty of guest parking," and "the complex has guest parking as well as street parking." This aligns with the current MLS data showing GUEST in 9 of 20 listings and indicates a building-level amenity rather than a single-unit claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks mention assigned stalls, guest parking, and street parking, but do not reference a parking waitlist or waiting list. Based on the absence of any waitlist language, this is assessed as false with medium-low confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for card- or fob-based access terminology. The listings support patrol- or guard-based security only, with no public-remarks evidence of a card access system.
Security service is well supported across the listing remarks and appears to be a real building amenity, not just copy-paste MLS data. Multiple listings explicitly mention "regular security patrol," "24 hour security patrol," "on-site security," and even "security guard," spanning several agents and unit types.
Security patrol service is repeatedly and directly confirmed across the remarks. This also aligns with the building context indicating security personnel.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is clearly confirmed for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention window units or similar wording, including 'New A/C window units installed in the living room and primary bedroom,' 'window ACs,' and '1/window & 2/Portable AC.' The evidence is strong and comes from multiple remarks rather than a single agent copy/paste entry.
Concrete construction is strongly supported across the building: 20 of 20 current MLS listings list CONCRE in the construction materials. One listing explicitly references a complex-wide “concrete spalling & seal/paint project in 2021,” reinforcing the MLS data across the building rather than appearing to be an isolated or copied unit claim.
There is no remark-level evidence for double-wall construction in the listings provided. The current data looks like a small, possibly copy-pasted MLS checkbox signal rather than verified building construction details, so this feature should not be treated as confirmed.
There is no public-remark support for hollow tile in these listings. Instead, the remarks repeatedly discuss concrete spalling and other concrete-related repairs, which cuts against hollow tile being a reliable building feature. Because the checkbox data is weak and unconfirmed, this appears likely to be an MLS inconsistency rather than a real feature.
Masonry-stucco is not supported by the public remarks. With only 1 of 20 MLS records showing MASSTU and no matching descriptive language from agents, this looks like an isolated MLS checkbox rather than a building-wide fact. The remarks are much more consistent with concrete construction.
No analysis available
The slab feature is weakly supported at best. Only 5 of 20 MLS records show SLAB, and none of the remarks explicitly reference a concrete slab or solid slab foundation. This looks like a likely MLS data artifact rather than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings explicitly mention above-ground construction or above-ground materials. Although 4/20 current listings are coded ABOGRO, this sparse support is inconsistent with the lack of remark confirmation and the previously low-confidence history, so the feature is excluded.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks discuss rental income, tenants, investors, and rental potential, but do not explicitly state that short-term rentals, vacation rentals, STRs, NUCs, or TVUs are permitted. No explicit prohibition or minimum rental period is stated either; under the absence-of-mention rule, this is assessed as false with medium-low confidence.
The remarks contain no evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program. Because short-term rental permission is not established, this prerequisite feature must remain false.
The listings do not describe any required hotel rental program or mandatory participation. With no evidence of STR permission or a hotel pool, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold, land lease, ground lease, lease expiry, expiration, and renewal language. No specific lease-expiry year was found, and the remarks do not establish that the property is leasehold.
The building is repeatedly described as VA approved or eligible for VA financing across numerous listings. Several remarks also advertise VA assumable loans for qualified buyers, providing strong building-level confirmation.
The remarks provide repeated direct evidence of comprehensive building insurance, including "100% hurricane-insured" and "100% hurricane insurance." This supports that the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for fire/life safety evaluation passage, FLSE certification, fire inspection approval, and life-safety compliance. No confirming or denying statement was found, so this is treated as false with low-to-medium confidence based on the absence of evidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are very well supported across the current listings: many units explicitly mention "mountain views," "Waianae Mountain views," "beautiful mountain views," and related phrases like "Koolau"/"mauka"-type outlooks. The historical MLS pattern was already high confidence, and the latest remarks reinforce that this building offers mountain-view units consistently across multiple listings.
No analysis available
There is limited evidence that some units may offer city-type views. One remark explicitly mentions "lush greenery/mountains/city lights," and the MLS data shows 1/20 listings marked CITY, but the feature is not broadly repeated across remarks. This looks like a real but uncommon building-level view option rather than a consistently advertised feature.
No analysis available
At least 5 of 20 current MLS listings identify GARDEN in the view descriptions, and multiple remarks explicitly support this with phrases such as "nicely landscaped grassy garden area," "garden views," "lush foliage," and "views of lush greenery." The evidence is consistent across several distinct listings and confirms that the building offers garden/landscaped views to some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Dozens of listings describe views (mountains, park, treetops, city lights, sunsets) but none mention sunrise, morning sun, or east-facing exposure. Because this feature is never called out despite extensive marketing language about views, it is not currently included as a confirmed building amenity.
Sunset views are strongly supported across many listings, with explicit mentions in several remarks including 'take in the sunset,' 'killer sunsets,' and 'Sunsets are nice.' The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and unit types, so this is not just a one-off copy-paste claim. Even where sunsets are not named directly, several remarks reference evening light, western exposure, or sunset-facing enjoyment from lanais.
No analysis available
No listing claims a Friday night fireworks view from a unit, lanai, or the building. References to sunsets, beaches, and North Shore scenery do not establish a fireworks view.
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Two current listings explicitly mention an "on-site resident manager" or "resident manager," while 12 of 20 current listings have RESMAN checked and historical data showed the feature in 13 of 20 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.