Cathedral Pt-Melemanu
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Cathedral Pt-Melemanu
Building Overview
Cathedral Pt-Melemanu in Mililani-Waipio, built 1973, concrete construction with pool and resident manager on site.
About Cathedral Pt-Melemanu
Cathedral Pt-Melemanu is located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1973 and is built of concrete. MLS data does not provide building square footage or unit count in the supplied information.
Key features based on MLS data include an on-site pool, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. The property advertises mountain and sunset views and is served by two elevators.
Additional details from MLS: parking is available, covered, assigned, and includes guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the provided data. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with the listing agent or property management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and qualifying phrases in the public remarks, but found no numerical disclosure. There is a single mention that a unit is owner occupied, which is helpful context but not enough to estimate a building-wide owner-occupancy percentage.
The public remarks directly confirm that the building has two elevators. I did not find any conflicting elevator count in the listings, so the current value is well supported.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable inclusion is supported by the MLS data and repeated remarks. Several listings say maintenance fees cover "Cable" or "Cable TV," including one that spells out streaming/cable package details, which suggests this is a building-wide benefit rather than a one-off agent error.
This feature is strongly supported by the MLS checkbox pattern: 16 of 20 listings include OTCOEX. Remarks also reference "common area upkeep" and "Other Common Elements," indicating this is consistently treated as part of the maintenance fee across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data shows 0 of 20 listings selecting HOTWAT, while 15 of 20 list WTRHTR, and remarks repeatedly reference individual unit water heaters (including tankless or new water heater installs). This is strong negative evidence against hot water being a building-paid amenity.
Internet inclusion is explicitly confirmed in multiple remarks and supported by current MLS data. Listings repeatedly state "internet," "high speed internet," or "internet Wi‑Fi" is covered, which is strong evidence that this building includes it in the HOA/maintenance fee.
No analysis available
Sewer is one of the clearest included fees in the dataset. With 18 of 20 listings showing SEWER and many remarks explicitly stating "water, sewer," this appears to be a consistent building-level inclusion.
Water inclusion is strongly confirmed by both MLS data and remarks. Many listings explicitly say maintenance fees include "Water," and the checkbox appears in 17 of 20 listings, making this a highly reliable building feature.
BBQ is strongly supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention a "BBQ area" or "BBQ areas," alongside other shared amenities like the pool and recreation areas. The feature appears to be a genuine building/common-area amenity and is not just isolated copy-paste marketing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I did not find public-remarks support for a clubhouse or community center in the listing set. With only 1 of 20 MLS records checking the box and no corroborating remarks, this appears more likely to be an MLS error than a real shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Very strong evidence that the building offers patio/deck-style outdoor space. Multiple current listings mention covered lanai, private lanai, patio lanai, open lanai, and even two lanais; this appears across many agents and is consistent with the historical MLS amenity data (PATDEC/COVPAT).
The remarks refer to parks, walking trails, and outdoor recreation in the area, but not a dedicated jogging or walking path owned by the building. Because the MLS evidence is very sparse and unsupported by remarks, I would not treat this as a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is consistently described as having a recreation area/rec area across many listings. Remarks explicitly mention 'recreation area,' 'rec area,' and 'recreation space,' often alongside other shared amenities, which makes this strong building-level evidence. This appears repeatedly across multiple agents and listing versions, so it does not look like a single copy-paste anomaly.
Current public remarks repeatedly mention a shared recreation/rec area (phrases include 'recreation area', 'rec area', 'recreation room' and 'recreation deck') even though the MLS amenity checkbox shows RECROO in only 1/20 listings. Multiple independent listing remarks reference the rec area alongside pool and other common amenities, indicating the building offers a shared recreation room/area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 public remarks clearly describe shared storage lockers or extra building storage, and the only MLS signal is a single one-off amenities checkbox. Most remarks instead reference unit closets, under-bed storage, or a bonus shed, which do not confirm a building-level storage unit amenity. Given the weak, copy-paste-prone MLS evidence and lack of supporting remarks, this feature is not validated.
I searched for surfboard storage and related phrases such as board storage or surf storage, but found nothing in the remarks. The listings mention storage inside units and closets, not dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
Dozens of remarks enumerate amenities like 'basketball & volleyball courts,' 'sports courts,' playgrounds, and parks, but not a single listing mentions a 'tennis court' or similar. With only 2 of 20 MLS records showing TENCOU and no textual support, the evidence points to there being no tennis court in this community, correcting likely MLS mis-checks.
Trash chute is supported by current MLS checkbox data in 7 of 20 listings, which suggests the amenity likely exists somewhere in the building. However, the public remarks provided do not explicitly mention a trash chute, so this looks more like moderate MLS evidence than remark-backed confirmation. Because the feature is present in multiple current listings and there is no strong contradictory evidence, it should remain included for now.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool access is strongly supported across the listings: well over 20 remarks mention it directly, including phrases like "community pool," "large community pool," "swimming pool," and "resort style amenities including a pool." The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listing types, so this appears to be a stable shared building amenity rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit salt-water pool wording such as 'saltwater pool' or 'salt pool' and found none. Multiple listings mention a community pool, but none identify it as salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly confirmed across the building. Roughly 18 of 20 current listings reference it, with multiple agents using explicit phrases such as 'washer and dryer in unit,' 'full-size washer and dryer,' and 'stacked washer and dryer.' The evidence appears consistent across many listings and is not limited to a single agent or one-off remark.
No analysis available
I looked for any public remarks indicating paid shared laundry, such as coin laundry or card-operated machines, but found no references. The listings instead emphasize in-unit washer and dryer, and there is no evidence of a paid common laundry facility.
I searched the public remarks for language like 'laundry on every floor,' 'laundry room on each floor,' or similar wording and found nothing. The listings repeatedly mention in-unit washer/dryer, which suggests private laundry rather than shared community laundry.
Parking is very strongly supported for this building. Dozens of remarks explicitly mention parking, including phrases like "1 assigned parking stall," "2 parking stalls," "assigned covered parking," "open parking," and "guest parking." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears to be genuine rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Assigned/reserved parking is very well supported in the building. Multiple remarks across the listings explicitly describe assigned or reserved spaces, including "assigned parking stall," "1 assigned parking stall," and "two assigned parking stalls," which aligns with the strong current MLS checkbox data. The evidence is broad and consistent across different listings rather than isolated.
Covered parking is strongly supported across many independent remarks, not just MLS checkboxes. Multiple listings explicitly mention "covered parking," "one covered & one open," "two covered parking stalls," and even parking located in a garage/covered stall, indicating this is a real building amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
There is direct evidence that parking is deeded with at least one unit in this building. Additional remarks consistently mention assigned stalls, included parking, and parking tied to the unit, supporting this conclusion.
No analysis available
I looked for references to parking fees, monthly parking rent, or any additional cost for stalls. The remarks only describe assigned, covered, open, guest, and street parking, but do not mention any fee.
Guest parking appears to be a genuine building feature supported by both MLS flags and remarks. Several listings independently mention "plenty of guest parking," "guest parking also available," or guest/street parking options, which is consistent with a shared amenity available to residents' visitors.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for language like 'parking waitlist,' 'waitlist for parking,' or similar terms and found none. The listings describe available assigned stalls and guest parking, which suggests parking is described directly rather than through a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob access language like keycard entry, fob access, or card readers, but the remarks only mention security patrol and a resident manager. That supports general security presence, but not a card-access system.
Security service is well supported across the listing remarks and appears to be a real building amenity, not just copy-paste MLS data. Multiple listings explicitly mention "regular security patrol," "24 hour security patrol," "on-site security," and even "security guard," spanning several agents and unit types.
The remarks directly confirm security patrol service in the building/community, and this appears repeatedly across listings. This is strong evidence that the property has patrol-based security.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is clearly confirmed across the listing set. At least 3-5 remarks explicitly mention window units or similar wording such as "window AC units," "1/window," or "air conditioning" tied to installed units, which supports that some units in the building have window AC. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears stronger than copy-paste checkbox data alone.
Concrete construction is very strongly supported. The current MLS data shows 20 of 20 listings marked CONCRE, and public remarks across many listings reinforce this with concrete spalling/seal/paint work. This looks consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent copy-paste issue.
There is no remark-level evidence for double-wall construction in the listings provided. The current data looks like a small, possibly copy-pasted MLS checkbox signal rather than verified building construction details, so this feature should not be treated as confirmed.
There is no public-remark support for hollow tile in these listings. Instead, the remarks repeatedly discuss concrete spalling and other concrete-related repairs, which cuts against hollow tile being a reliable building feature. Because the checkbox data is weak and unconfirmed, this appears likely to be an MLS inconsistency rather than a real feature.
Masonry-stucco is not supported by the public remarks. With only 1 of 20 MLS records showing MASSTU and no matching descriptive language from agents, this looks like an isolated MLS checkbox rather than a building-wide fact. The remarks are much more consistent with concrete construction.
No analysis available
The slab feature is weakly supported at best. Only 5 of 20 MLS records show SLAB, and none of the remarks explicitly reference a concrete slab or solid slab foundation. This looks like a likely MLS data artifact rather than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no remark-based confirmation for above-ground construction. The only support is sparse MLS coding (3 of 20 listings tagged ABOGRO), which looks more like inconsistent checkbox usage than verified building information. Because there is not enough evidence to safely overturn it, I am leaving it as a very low-confidence positive.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, NUC, vacation rental, TVU, or 30-day minimum rules, but found no such language. The remarks discuss investor appeal and rental potential, which is not evidence that short-term rentals are permitted, so this is treated as not allowed/unsupported by the public remarks.
I searched for hotel rental pool, branded rental program, or management-by-hotel language and found none. Since there is no evidence of STR permission either, a hotel pool program is not supported.
I looked for language showing required participation in a rental pool or hotel program and found nothing. There are also no remarks suggesting an optional or mandatory pool arrangement, so this is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease,' 'leasehold expiring,' and renewal dates, but found nothing. Since no specific lease-expiry year is stated in the public remarks, the value remains unknown.
The public remarks repeatedly confirm VA financing support for this building. I found several explicit references to VA approval and assumable VA loans, which is strong direct evidence.
The listings repeatedly indicate full insurance coverage, with the strongest wording being "100% hurricane-insured." That is direct public-remarks evidence for fully insured / walls-in style coverage.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit fire/life safety evaluation language and found none. The listings mention items like hurricane insurance, security patrol, and a fire alarm special assessment, but those are not the same as a passed FLSE, so I am not treating this as evidence of a pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are very well supported across the current listings: many units explicitly mention "mountain views," "Waianae Mountain views," "beautiful mountain views," and related phrases like "Koolau"/"mauka"-type outlooks. The historical MLS pattern was already high confidence, and the latest remarks reinforce that this building offers mountain-view units consistently across multiple listings.
No analysis available
There is limited evidence that some units may offer city-type views. One remark explicitly mentions "lush greenery/mountains/city lights," and the MLS data shows 1/20 listings marked CITY, but the feature is not broadly repeated across remarks. This looks like a real but uncommon building-level view option rather than a consistently advertised feature.
No analysis available
Several current listings reference garden-like views or greenery, including phrases such as "nicely landscaped grassy garden area," "views of lush greenery and majestic mountains," "park views," and "beautifully landscaped grounds." This aligns with the prior MLS evidence and suggests some units in the building offer garden/landscaped/courtyard-style views rather than this being a one-off remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Dozens of listings describe views (mountains, park, treetops, city lights, sunsets) but none mention sunrise, morning sun, or east-facing exposure. Because this feature is never called out despite extensive marketing language about views, it is not currently included as a confirmed building amenity.
Sunset views are strongly supported across multiple listings. At least several remarks explicitly mention sunsets or evening light, including "sunset views from your own private lanai," "take in the sunset," and "Sunsets are nice," which makes this a clear building-level feature. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste claim.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to seeing Friday night fireworks from the unit, lanai, or building and found none. The view descriptions focus on mountains, sunsets, greenery, and treetops, which do not establish a fireworks view.
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports an on-site resident manager for this building. Historical MLS data showed RESMAN checked in 13 of 20 listings, and at least one current remark explicitly states "on-site resident manager." The repeated listing pattern across multiple agents suggests this is a real building feature, not a mistaken checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.