Cathedral Pt-Melemanu
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Cathedral Pt-Melemanu
Building Overview
Cathedral Pt-Melemanu in Mililani-Waipio, built 1973, concrete construction with pool and resident manager on site.
About Cathedral Pt-Melemanu
Cathedral Pt-Melemanu is located in the Mililani-Waipio neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1973 and is built of concrete. MLS data does not provide building square footage or unit count in the supplied information.
Key features based on MLS data include an on-site pool, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. The property advertises mountain and sunset views and is served by two elevators.
Additional details from MLS: parking is available, covered, assigned, and includes guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the provided data. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with the listing agent or property management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for direct owner-occupancy indicators such as percentages, "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," but found no building-level evidence. One remark mentions a specific unit as owner occupied, but that does not establish the overall percentage of owner-occupied units for the building.
Public remarks directly confirm that the building has two elevators. I did not find any conflicting remark stating a different count, so the current value is strongly supported.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
At least four separate listings for Cathedral Point/Melemanu state that the monthly HOA or maintenance fees include cable, sometimes specifying 'cable with HBO' or grouping it with internet, water, and sewer. This aligns with prior MLS checkbox data (CABTV selected in 5/20 listings), supporting that building fees include cable service.
Strong evidence that maintenance fees include common area electricity/common elements. The MLS data is high confidence (16/20 listings with OTCOEX), and remarks consistently reference "common area upkeep" and "other common elements." This appears to be repeated across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent copy.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data shows 0 of 20 listings selecting HOTWAT, while 15 of 20 list WTRHTR, and remarks repeatedly reference individual unit water heaters (including tankless or new water heater installs). This is strong negative evidence against hot water being a building-paid amenity.
Internet is clearly included in the HOA/maintenance fee. Several listings explicitly state "maintenance fees include internet," "internet Wi‑Fi," or list internet alongside cable, while the MLS has 8/20 records marked INTSER. The consistency across multiple remarks supports a true building-level amenity.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly confirmed. The MLS data shows SEWER in 17 of 20 listings, and current remarks repeatedly say "water, sewer" or "maintenance fees include... sewer." This is consistent across many listings and appears reliable.
Water is clearly included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data shows WATER in 16 of 20 listings, and multiple remarks explicitly say "water included" or list water alongside sewer and internet. The evidence is consistent across many listings and agents.
BBQ is strongly supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention a "BBQ area" or "BBQ areas," alongside other shared amenities like the pool and recreation areas. The feature appears to be a genuine building/common-area amenity and is not just isolated copy-paste marketing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I did not find public-remarks support for a clubhouse or community center in the listing set. With only 1 of 20 MLS records checking the box and no corroborating remarks, this appears more likely to be an MLS error than a real shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across multiple listings that the building offers patios/decks: MLS amenities list PATDEC/COVPAT on 10 of 20 current listings and numerous public remarks mention 'lanai', 'covered lanai', 'private patio' or 'two lanais' (e.g., 'private lanai', 'large, covered lanai', 'two private lanais'). Mentions appear in many different agents' remarks rather than a single copy/paste instance, supporting high confidence that patio/deck amenities exist for multiple units.
The remarks refer to parks, walking trails, and outdoor recreation in the area, but not a dedicated jogging or walking path owned by the building. Because the MLS evidence is very sparse and unsupported by remarks, I would not treat this as a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is repeatedly described as having a recreation area or rec area. Several current listings use phrases like "community pool and rec area," "recreation space," and "recreation area," confirming the amenity across multiple remarks and agents. The evidence is consistent with the MLS data and strongly supports inclusion.
Current public remarks repeatedly mention a shared recreation/rec area (phrases include 'recreation area', 'rec area', 'recreation room' and 'recreation deck') even though the MLS amenity checkbox shows RECROO in only 1/20 listings. Multiple independent listing remarks reference the rec area alongside pool and other common amenities, indicating the building offers a shared recreation room/area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 public remarks clearly describe shared storage lockers or extra building storage, and the only MLS signal is a single one-off amenities checkbox. Most remarks instead reference unit closets, under-bed storage, or a bonus shed, which do not confirm a building-level storage unit amenity. Given the weak, copy-paste-prone MLS evidence and lack of supporting remarks, this feature is not validated.
I searched for surfboard storage and similar storage-amenity phrases. The remarks mention general storage features like closets and cabinets, but nothing about dedicated surfboard storage.
Dozens of remarks enumerate amenities like 'basketball & volleyball courts,' 'sports courts,' playgrounds, and parks, but not a single listing mentions a 'tennis court' or similar. With only 2 of 20 MLS records showing TENCOU and no textual support, the evidence points to there being no tennis court in this community, correcting likely MLS mis-checks.
Trash chute appears in 6 of 20 current MLS listings, which suggests the building likely offers this amenity. The public remarks provided do not explicitly mention a trash chute, so the evidence is mostly from the MLS amenity field rather than listing descriptions. This looks more like recurring MLS data than a confirmed remark-based feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool access is strongly supported across the listings: dozens of remarks explicitly mention a "community pool," "large community pool," "swimming pool," or "AOAO swimming pool." The amenity is referenced consistently across multiple units and agents, matching the current MLS amenities (20/20 listings).
No analysis available
I searched for salt-water pool wording such as saltwater pool or salt pool. The listings only refer to a regular community swimming pool, so there is no evidence that it is salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly confirmed across the building. Well over a dozen current listings explicitly mention it, including exact phrases such as 'washer/dryer in unit,' 'full-size washer and dryer,' and 'stacked washer and dryer.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, suggesting this is a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks indicating coin laundry, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. The available remarks consistently point to private in-unit laundry rather than paid community laundry.
I searched for phrases like laundry on each floor, community laundry on every floor, and floor-by-floor laundry access. The remarks instead emphasize in-unit laundry in many listings, which argues against a shared laundry room on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the building. Dozens of current remarks explicitly mention parking, including phrases like "1 parking stall," "2 parking stalls," "covered parking stall," and "guest parking," across many different listings and agents. This appears to be consistent rather than copy-paste error, and the current MLS data also supports it on all listings.
Assigned/reserved parking is very well supported in the building. Multiple remarks across the listings explicitly describe assigned or reserved spaces, including "assigned parking stall," "1 assigned parking stall," and "two assigned parking stalls," which aligns with the strong current MLS checkbox data. The evidence is broad and consistent across different listings rather than isolated.
Covered parking is strongly supported across many independent remarks, not just MLS checkboxes. Multiple listings explicitly mention "covered parking," "one covered & one open," "two covered parking stalls," and even parking located in a garage/covered stall, indicating this is a real building amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
The remarks directly indicate that parking is deeded with the unit. Multiple listings also reference assigned stalls, but the clearest evidence is the explicit "deeded parking" wording.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks mentioning a monthly parking fee, parking rent, additional parking cost, or whether parking is included. The listings discuss assigned stalls, covered/uncovered parking, and guest parking, but do not state any parking charge.
Guest parking appears to be a genuine building feature supported by both MLS flags and remarks. Several listings independently mention "plenty of guest parking," "guest parking also available," or guest/street parking options, which is consistent with a shared amenity available to residents' visitors.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or parking queue system and found none. The remarks instead emphasize assigned parking stalls and guest parking, with no evidence of a waitlist process.
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for card/fob access language like keycard entry or electronic access. The only security references are patrols, guards, and management, which do not confirm a card-access system.
Security service is strongly supported across the listing remarks. Several listings explicitly mention 'regular security patrol,' '24 hour security patrol,' 'on-site security,' and 'security guard,' and the current MLS amenities also show SECGUA checked on many listings. The repeated mentions across multiple agents make this a high-confidence building feature.
This feature is directly confirmed multiple times across the public remarks. The listings explicitly mention security patrol service, including 'regular security patrol' and '24 hour security patrol,' which is strong evidence that the building has patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is clearly confirmed across the listing set. At least 3-5 remarks explicitly mention window units or similar wording such as "window AC units," "1/window," or "air conditioning" tied to installed units, which supports that some units in the building have window AC. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and appears stronger than copy-paste checkbox data alone.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the current MLS data: 20 of 20 listings are marked CONCRE. Remarks across the listings also include an explicit reference to a "complete concrete spalling & seal/paint project in 2021," which is consistent with a concrete building rather than a copied checkbox error. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
There is no remark-level evidence for double-wall construction in the listings provided. The current data looks like a small, possibly copy-pasted MLS checkbox signal rather than verified building construction details, so this feature should not be treated as confirmed.
No public remarks mention hollow tile construction, while multiple listings reference concrete-focused maintenance such as spalling work. With only 4 of 20 listings currently coded as hollow tile and no supporting remarks, this appears more likely to be MLS checkbox drift or copy/paste error than a reliable building feature. Confidence is moderate-high that hollow tile should not be treated as a confirmed construction feature here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Weak evidence: 6 of 20 MLS records identify slab foundation but none of the public remarks explicitly reference a "concrete slab" or slab foundation. Without corroborating remarks or owner/site verification, the presence of slab foundations is possible for some units but remains uncertain.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no remark-based confirmation for above-ground construction. The only support is sparse MLS coding (3 of 20 listings tagged ABOGRO), which looks more like inconsistent checkbox usage than verified building information. Because there is not enough evidence to safely overturn it, I am leaving it as a very low-confidence positive.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, NUC, TVU, vacation rental language, or hotel-style rental permissions, but found no evidence. Some remarks mention rental potential or tenant occupancy, but nothing indicates short-term rentals are permitted.
I searched for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, managed hotel program, or similar hotel-operations language and found nothing. Since there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, this must also be false.
I looked for wording indicating a required hotel pool or mandatory participation, such as must-rent, cannot opt out, or required program participation, and found none. There is also no evidence of any STR program at all, so this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease, lease ends, renewed through, or a specific expiration year, but found nothing. There is no public indication in these remarks that the building is leasehold or when any lease might expire.
The public remarks repeatedly confirm that this building supports VA financing. I found several explicit mentions of VA approval and assumable VA loans, which is strong direct evidence.
Multiple listings describe the association as fully insured, including the specific phrase "100% hurricane-insured." That is strong public-remark evidence that the building carries full insurance/walls-in coverage.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit fire/life safety approval language such as FLSE passed, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, and found none. The only related reference was a special assessment for fire alarm system repairs, which suggests maintenance activity rather than a confirmed pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that this building offers mountain-view units. Many current listings explicitly mention mountain views or related phrases such as "Waianae Mountain views," "mountain and sunset views," "breathtaking mountain views," and "cool mountain breeze." The consistency across multiple remarks supports this as a real building-level offering, not just MLS checkbox noise.
No analysis available
There is limited evidence that some units may offer city-type views. One remark explicitly mentions "lush greenery/mountains/city lights," and the MLS data shows 1/20 listings marked CITY, but the feature is not broadly repeated across remarks. This looks like a real but uncommon building-level view option rather than a consistently advertised feature.
No analysis available
Several listings reference garden-like or landscaped views, with phrases such as "nicely landscaped grassy garden area," "views of lush greenery," "overlooks a lush park," and "views of the park." The evidence appears to come from multiple agents and aligns with the prior high-confidence summary that this building offers green/garden-oriented outlooks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Dozens of listings describe views (mountains, park, treetops, city lights, sunsets) but none mention sunrise, morning sun, or east-facing exposure. Because this feature is never called out despite extensive marketing language about views, it is not currently included as a confirmed building amenity.
Sunset views are strongly supported across multiple listings. At least several remarks explicitly mention sunsets or evening light, including "sunset views from your own private lanai," "take in the sunset," and "Sunsets are nice," which makes this a clear building-level feature. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste claim.
No analysis available
I searched for direct-view language such as seeing fireworks from the lanai or unit. The remarks mention mountain, garden, sunset, and North Shore views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports an on-site resident manager for this building. Historical MLS data shows RESMAN checked in 12 of 20 listings, and current public remarks explicitly mention "resident manager" among the amenities. Because this appears across multiple listings and aligns with the historical checkbox pattern, confidence is high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.