Capri Apts Ltd

The sole MLS record for this building reports a construction year of 1959. No listing remarks indicate a different build or full reconstruction date.

Remarks say it is a '4 stroy walk-up', which directly indicates a 4-story building. MLS property data also shows units on the 4th floor with no evidence of higher floors.

No listing remarks or fields state the total number of units (e.g., 'x-unit building'). With only one listing and no explicit count, the building unit total cannot be determined.

The remarks reference a current tenant and rental terms but do not quantify or characterize overall owner occupancy in the building. Without explicit percentages or descriptors like "highly owner occupied," the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.

The remark explicitly calls the building a four-story walk-up, which by definition indicates there are no elevators. No language suggesting any elevator service appears elsewhere in the remarks.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

The building is described as a 4-story walk-up with no mention of central AC or AC utilities being covered by maintenance fees. With ACCEN unchecked in the 1/1 current listing, it is very likely that central AC costs are not included in the fees.

Across the 1/1 current listing, cable TV is not selected in the MLS fee-includes data and is not mentioned in the public remarks as being covered by maintenance. Agents typically highlight included cable service, so its omission plus the unchecked MLS box indicates cable is not included in the fees.

The single current listing does not select common area electricity in the MLS fee-includes section, and the remarks focus on other aspects (co-op conversion, laundry, parking) without mentioning building power. This supports that common area electricity is not treated as a separately highlighted, included fee item in the MLS data.

The remarks repeatedly mention the property is a leasehold co-op converting to a condo but do not state that cooperative taxes are included in the fees. With COOTAX left unchecked in the 1/1 current MLS listing, the best available evidence is that coop taxes are not explicitly included as a separate maintenance component here.

The single current listing does not indicate electricity as an included association fee item and the narrative remarks are silent about power being included. Given agents typically call out included electricity, this strongly suggests electricity is paid separately by occupants rather than through the maintenance fee.

There is no MLS checkbox selection or textual reference to gas being included in the HOA/maintenance fees in the 1/1 listing. This absence, combined with standard practice of highlighting included gas when present, points to gas not being included.

The MLS data explicitly notes a water heater (WTRHTR) for the unit but does not mark hot water as an included association fee item. Under the field definitions, the presence of individual water heaters is strong evidence that building-supplied hot water is not provided as part of the maintenance fees.

In the lone current listing, internet service is neither checked as an included fee item in the MLS nor mentioned in the narrative. This combination strongly suggests that internet is not part of the association-covered utilities.

There is no indication in MLS fee-includes data or remarks that this building offers marina access or covers marina-related fees. Given the building type (4-story walk-up near Waikiki Beach) and the complete absence of marina mentions, it is almost certain that marina fees are not included.

The 1/1 current listing has SEWER checked as an association-included item, indicating that sewer charges are part of the maintenance fees. The public remarks do not conflict with this and do not suggest any change, so this building should be treated as including sewer in the maintenance fee.

The MLS data for the single current listing clearly shows water included in the association fees. With no contradictory text in the remarks, the evidence supports that building water service is covered by the maintenance fee.

No listings (0/1) indicate a BBQ area in the amenities. Given the detailed remarks and the simple walk-up nature of the building, it appears there are no shared BBQ facilities.

No listings (0/1) select bike storage in amenities, and the remarks—while discussing many building details—do not reference any bike or bicycle storage. This consistent absence suggests the building does not provide a dedicated bike storage facility.

MLS data (0/1) does not list any marina or boat dock. Given the urban Waikiki location and building type, it is effectively certain there is no boat dock amenity.

MLS data (0/1) does not indicate any car wash station. The listing’s focus on future sale of parking stalls, without added parking amenities, indicates no car wash feature.

No listings (0/1) mark a clubhouse. The building is described as self‑managed and simple, with no mention of any clubhouse or community center, so one almost certainly does not exist.

The sole listing does not mention concierge or front desk services and instead highlights self-management of the building. With the concierge amenity unchecked in MLS, it is very unlikely that any concierge service is offered.

Zero listings (0/1) identify any dog park or pet run. The building is portrayed as a simple, dense Waikiki walk‑up with no dedicated dog exercise area.

In 1/1 listings, there is no reference to any doorman or lobby attendant, and the building is explicitly noted as self-managed. The lack of both remarks and MLS indication makes it very likely there is no doorman service.

No listings (0/1) check an exercise or fitness room in the amenities. The sole set of remarks describes a basic walk-up with community laundry only, strongly implying there is no shared exercise room.

No listings (0/1) mention limousine or courtesy car service. The building is described as a modest, self‑managed property, effectively ruling out limo service as an amenity.

MLS data (0/1) does not list a meeting room. The remarks focus on unit/lease details and laundry, with no hint of shared meeting or conference facilities.

1/1 listing explicitly mentions a 'Spaciou lanai with storage space,' indicating patio/deck-type outdoor space is available in the building. Even though the MLS checkbox for patio/deck is not used, the lanai reference provides strong evidence of this feature.

No listings (0/1) report a jogging or walking path as an amenity. The building is simply located one block from the beach, with no dedicated on‑site fitness path described.

No listings (0/1) list a playground or kids’ play area. The limited common features described (community laundry) suggest there is no children’s playground.

0/1 listings reference any private or fenced yard; the only outdoor space described is a lanai. Given the 4-story walk-up configuration in a dense urban setting, it is very unlikely the building offers true private yard areas for units.

MLS data (0/1) shows no putting green. Given the building’s modest size and lack of any mention of such an amenity, it can be treated as not present.

Amenities in MLS (0/1) do not include a recreation area. The narrative focuses on proximity to Waikiki Beach and community laundry, implying there is no dedicated recreation deck or area.

No listings (0/1) report a recreation room. Agent remarks describe the property’s basics without mentioning any shared rec or game room, suggesting none exists.

Zero listings (0/1) list a restaurant as a building amenity. The description references nearby Waikiki attractions but not an internal restaurant, so none is expected.

No listings (0/1) show rooftop amenities like a roof deck. The single listing’s detailed description omits any rooftop feature, indicating there is no shared rooftop amenity.

No listings (0/1) list a sauna or steam room. The described amenity set is minimal, making it very unlikely that a sauna exists in the building.

In the single available listing, both building amenities and unit features include storage/extra storage, and the remarks mention a 'lanai with storage space.' This supports that at least some units offer additional storage beyond standard closets. With no contrary data, it is reasonable to treat storage units/extra storage as available in this building.

The remarks describe a spacious lanai with storage space but do not indicate any dedicated surfboard or board storage facilities. Searched for terms like surfboard, board storage, and surf storage and found no relevant references, so dedicated surfboard storage is likely not present.

Zero listings (0/1) show tennis courts in the amenities. The compact, self‑managed walk‑up configuration and complete absence of any reference to tennis strongly indicate there is no tennis court.

No listings (0/1) mark a trash chute, and the building is only four stories with walk-up access. This configuration typically uses central bins rather than chutes, so a trash chute system is unlikely.

0/1 listings mention valet or valet parking, instead describing a small number of parking stalls for sale to owners. The small, self-managed 4-story walk-up profile makes valet service highly unlikely.

The 1/1 listing makes no reference to a gated entry, perimeter wall, or fencing, focusing instead on proximity to Waikiki Beach and building management details. Combined with the absence of gated/wall-fence amenities in MLS, this suggests the property is not enclosed by a security wall or fence.

Zero listings (0/1) report a whirlpool or hot tub. With only community laundry noted as a shared facility, it is very likely there is no shared whirlpool.

Across 1/1 current listings, no MLS amenity boxes for pool are checked and the remarks do not mention any kind of swimming pool. The building is described as a small 4-story walk-up with other details (laundry, parking, condo conversion) but nothing about a pool, so this feature is omitted with high confidence.

There are no mentions of a pool or heated pool in the sole available listing, and no heated-pool-related fields are checked in the MLS data. Because the building appears not to have a pool, the existence of a heated pool can be confidently excluded.

The public remarks do not reference a pool of any kind, including saltwater or saline pools. I specifically searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found none. Based on this absence, the building is assumed not to have a saltwater pool.

The single available listing notes that in-unit washer/dryers are allowed but does not state that this unit has one, nor do the inclusions list a washer/dryer. There is no evidence across listings that any units currently have in-unit laundry, so this feature cannot be confirmed at the building level.

1/1 listings explicitly mention 'Community laundry on the ground floor' and the MLS amenities also show community laundry checked. This is strong, consistent evidence that the building has shared/community laundry facilities.

The remarks note the existence of community laundry but do not indicate whether it is paid (coin-op or card). Since there is no reference to any payment mechanism, this is assumed not present, though the absence of detail lowers confidence.

The listing explicitly mentions community laundry located on the ground floor only. There is no indication of separate laundry facilities on each floor, so this feature is marked as not present.

In this single listing, the agent notes that 'The 4 parking stalls will be for sale after the conversion to owners of the building only,' indicating there are on-site stalls associated with the building. Although the MLS parking checkbox is set to NONE, the detailed remark is strong, building-level evidence that some parking exists on-site.

The single available listing does not check any MLS code for assigned or deeded parking and does not use terms like 'assigned' or 'reserved' in the remarks. The future sale of four stalls is mentioned, but there is no clear indication that assigned parking is currently a building feature.

The MLS data for this listing does not show any covered or garage-type parking features, and the narrative remarks do not reference a garage, carport, or covered stalls. Given the small, older walk-up character of the building and the description of only four stalls, covered parking is very unlikely to be present.

The listing indicates that parking stalls will be sold to owners after a future conversion, implying that deeded/owned parking is not currently provided with the units. There is no indication that this unit presently includes a deeded stall.

The single listing’s MLS data and remarks are completely silent on EV charging or stations. For a small 4-stall, 4-story walk-up with no mention of such amenities, it is very likely that EV charging is not provided.

The remarks do not discuss any ongoing or monthly parking costs. Searched for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'additional parking cost', and 'parking rental' but found no references.

The only described stalls are intended for sale to building owners, and there is no mention of guest or visitor parking in MLS fields or remarks. With just four total stalls, it is highly unlikely that dedicated guest parking exists.

Neither MLS checkbox data nor the narrative remarks suggest any form of gated or secured-entry parking. For this small walk-up with only four stalls, there is strong reason to believe there is no secured-entry parking system.

The available listing does not identify tandem parking in MLS data or text. With only four unspecified stalls and no tandem language, tandem parking is very unlikely to be a building feature.

This is a self-managed 4-story walk-up with only four parking stalls and no mention of staff or valet in any context. Given the building’s scale and MLS data, valet parking can be confidently ruled out.

Nothing in the public remarks suggests a parking waitlist system. Searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list for parking', and similar phrases, with no results, so a waitlist is unlikely based on available information.

The only listing describes the building as a '4 stroy walk-up', which by definition means no elevator. With no elevator present and the elevator amenity unchecked in MLS, there cannot be a keyed or secure elevator system.

The remarks describe the building as a self-managed 4-story walk-up and focus on location, rental terms, and amenities like community laundry, but do not reference any card or fob access system. Searched for terms such as key card, fob, electronic access, and card reader and found no evidence of a security card system.

Across 1/1 listings, there is no mention of a security guard, 24/7 security, or on-site security staff. The building is described as a self-managed 4-story walk-up, and the MLS checkbox for security guard is unchecked, which strongly suggests there is no staffed security guard service.

The description includes details about building management, conversion from co-op to condo, and parking, but nothing about any security patrol or roving security service. Searched specifically for words like patrol, security patrol, and roving security and found no indications that such a service exists.

In the single available listing, there are no phrases like 'security cameras', 'video surveillance', or 'CCTV'. Combined with the absence of a checked security system amenity in MLS, this implies the building likely does not have a formal video security system.

Across 1/1 listings, no MLS central AC fields are checked and the remarks never reference central air or building-wide HVAC. Given the building’s small, older walk-up profile and the explicit reliance on window units in MLS data, it is highly likely the building does not offer central air conditioning.

In 1/1 listings, there is no MLS indication of split or ductless AC and no textual mention of mini-split or split systems. With only window AC being explicitly recorded, there is no evidence that any units in this building currently feature split AC systems.

The 1/1 listing for this building has the window AC inclusion field (ACWIUN) checked, confirming at least one unit has a window air conditioner. Because any presence should be surfaced at the building level, window AC is considered available in this building.

1/1 current listing marks the construction material as concrete (CONCRE) in the MLS data. No listing remarks describe any alternative primary structural material, so concrete construction is the best-supported description.

1/1 listing omits double wall (DOUWAL) in favor of concrete construction. No remarks suggest traditional double-wall framing, so this construction type is very unlikely.

1/1 listing leaves hollow tile (HOLTIL) unchecked and simply notes concrete construction. With no remarks mentioning hollow tile, it is unlikely to be a designated hollow-tile building in the MLS sense.

1/1 listing omits masonry/stucco (MASSTU) from construction materials. The MLS data points only to concrete, and remarks do not describe a masonry-stucco structure.

1/1 listing leaves steel frame (STEFRA) unchecked in favor of concrete construction. No remarks mention steel framing, supporting that the building is not classified as steel-frame.

1/1 listing leaves concrete slab (SLAB) unchecked and only notes concrete and above-ground construction. With no remarks about a slab foundation, slab construction is unlikely as an MLS-recognized feature.

No analysis available

1/1 listing omits wood frame (WOOFRA) in the construction fields while explicitly marking concrete. Given the building type and MLS data, it is very likely not considered wood-frame construction.

1/1 listing explicitly marks above-ground construction (ABOGRO) in the MLS data. No listings or remarks suggest slab-on-grade or other alternative foundation types that would conflict with this.

1/1 listing omits brick (BRICK) from construction materials and instead marks concrete. There are no remarks about brick exterior or brick construction, so brick construction can be ruled out with high confidence.

1/1 listing leaves single wall (SINWAL) unchecked and identifies the building as a 4-story walk-up near Waikiki Beach, which aligns with multi-wall/concrete rather than traditional single-wall construction.

The listing explicitly notes a 30-day minimum rental, which is standard language indicating that true short-term (hotel-style) rentals are prohibited. Based on this, STR is considered not allowed in this building.

Because the building does not permit true short-term rentals, it cannot participate in a hotel rental pool program. The remarks also contain no references to any hotel pool or hotel-operated rental program.

A mandatory hotel rental pool would only apply in a building allowing hotel-type short-term rentals, which this building does not. The remarks provide no indication of any required rental program participation.

The listing notes that this unit holds a '6.67 % interest of the land' while some others do not, implying a mix of ownership where certain units effectively own land interest (fee simple–like). Based on this one listing, 1 of 1 described units has land interest, suggesting fee simple components exist in the project.

The building is called a 'lease hold coop' with a lease that 'ends in May of next year', clearly indicating leased land. The same remarks add that not all units have land interest, confirming that some units are purely leasehold alongside others with land shares.

The listing references the lease ending in May of an unspecified "next year," which is relative to the listing date that is not provided. Because no explicit calendar year is given, the exact lease expiry year cannot be determined from these remarks.

The listing explicitly says that no loans can be obtained for this leasehold coop, which would include VA loans. There are no indications of VA approval or VA financing being accepted. Therefore, the building is treated as not VA-loan approved based on these remarks.

Looked for phrases such as fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage but found none. There is no indication in the remarks that the HOA provides full walls-in insurance coverage.

Neither the single listing’s remarks nor its amenities checkbox indicate a fire sprinkler system. Given the lack of any reference, sprinklers are likely not a notable building feature, but this is not certain.

Searched for terms like fire life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire inspection, fire safety certified, and life safety compliant, but none appear. With no evidence in the remarks, this is marked as not documented/presumed not present by default.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

0/1 listings flag OCEAN in the MLS view description, and the remarks only note proximity to Waikiki Beach with no reference to ocean views. Given agents typically highlight even partial ocean views in Waikiki, the lack of any such mention indicates the building likely does not offer notable ocean-view units.

0/1 listings flag any mountain-related view in the MLS view description, and the remarks contain no references to mountain or mauka views. This consistent absence indicates the building is not marketed as having mountain-view units.

0/1 listings flag DIAMOND HEAD in the MLS view description, and the public remarks make no mention of Diamond Head. In a market where Diamond Head views are routinely advertised, this suggests the building does not provide recognizable Diamond Head views.

0/1 listings flag CITY in the MLS view description, and there are no textual mentions of city or urban views. The lack of any city-view marketing indicates that city views are not a notable selling feature for this building.

0/1 listings flag COASTLINE in the MLS view description, and remarks focus on proximity to Waikiki Beach rather than any coastal outlook. In Waikiki, coastline views are typically highlighted, so their absence strongly suggests they are not present here.

0/1 listings flag GARDEN in the MLS view description, and the remarks emphasize lanai space and breezes but not garden or courtyard outlooks. This indicates garden views are not a recognized feature of the building.

0/1 listings flag GOLF COURSE in the MLS view description, and remarks are silent on any golf-related views. The geography plus complete lack of references make golf course views effectively impossible for this building.

0/1 listings flag MARINA/CANAL/harbor views in the MLS view description, and the remarks do not mention marina, harbor, yacht harbor, or canal views. Given the location and absence of such language, the building is very unlikely to offer marina views.

0/1 listings flag SUNRISE in the MLS view description, and remarks do not describe sunrise or morning-sun views. The absence of any such marketing suggests sunrise views are not a notable building feature.

0/1 listings flag SUNSET in the MLS view description, and there are no textual mentions of sunset-oriented views or fireworks. This consistent omission indicates the building does not offer distinctive sunset views worth advertising.

0/1 listings flag CEMETERY in the MLS view description, and the remarks make no mention of any cemetery views. Given the neighborhood context, cemetery views can be confidently ruled out for this building.

I searched the remarks for any reference to fireworks or viewing fireworks from the building or units and found none. Given the lack of marketing of this feature, it is likely the building does not emphasize or have a notable fireworks view.

No analysis available

0/1 listings reference pets or pet rules, and there is no explicit 'no pets' language either. Because the available data do not confirm pets are allowed, this building cannot be reliably advertised as pet-friendly.

MLS amenities for this building indicate a resident/on-site manager (RESMAN). While the remarks do not repeat this, there is no information suggesting otherwise, so it is treated as a current building feature.

1/1 listing describes a 30-day minimum rental but gives no indication of hotel-style operations or programs. The absence of any condotel-related language plus the 30-day minimum strongly suggests this is not a condotel property.

1/1 listing clearly states the building is a 'Coop' and a 'lease hold coop' that is in the process of converting to a condo. These repeated explicit references provide near-certain confirmation that the current ownership structure is cooperative.