Canterbury Place
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Canterbury Place
Building Overview
Canterbury Place in Waikiki — 40-story concrete building (1978) with pool and fitness center.
About Canterbury Place
Canterbury Place is a 40-floor, 142-unit condominium in the Hobron-Ena district of Waikiki, built in 1978 with concrete construction. The building provides a mix of ocean, Diamond Head and sunset views from various units.
Key features include an on-site pool, fitness center, BBQ area, resident manager and security guard. The building has central and window air conditioning and is served by three elevators.
Parking is available with covered, assigned stalls and guest parking. Pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The property is managed by Hawaiiana Management Company, Ltd. According to available MLS data, buyers should verify all details and any applicable fees with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit owner-occupancy clues such as percentages or phrases like "owner occupied" and found none. The current value of 34 remains in place because there is no remark evidence to confirm a different percentage.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator counts such as "3 elevators," "4 elevators," or "multiple elevators," but found none. The current value of 3 is retained because there is no remark evidence to confirm or deny it, even though a 40-story, 142-unit building would reasonably have multiple elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
Central A/C appears to be a stable building-level inclusion. Public remarks repeatedly state "maintenance fee includes central AC" or "all utilities including central AC," matching the high-confidence MLS pattern (18/20).
Cable inclusion is strongly supported across many listings, with roughly 10+ remarks explicitly naming cable TV or cable service as part of the maintenance fee. The wording is consistent across multiple agents and reads like a building-level amenity, not a one-off unit note.
Direct wording is less common in remarks, but the building’s MLS data consistently codes common-area electricity/common expenses. The remarks that do reference it align with that pattern, so this looks like a real building-level inclusion rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
Electricity is one of the most consistently confirmed inclusions in the building. Remarks repeatedly say "maintenance fee includes electricity" or "all utilities including electricity," and the MLS pattern is nearly universal (19/20).
No analysis available
Hot water is repeatedly included in the maintenance fee across many listings. The remarks commonly say "hot water" or "hot/cold water" is covered, and the MLS history is highly consistent (17/20), so this remains a strong true feature.
Internet service is clearly supported by the public remarks and MLS history. Several listings mention "internet," "Wi‑Fi," or "high-speed internet" as included, and the MLS coding remains strong (15/20).
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is one of the most stable utility inclusions in the building. Remarks repeatedly list sewer alongside water, electricity, and hot water, and the MLS data is nearly universal (19/20).
Water is repeatedly confirmed across the listings and appears to be a standard building-level inclusion. The remarks consistently mention water as included, matching the near-universal MLS pattern (19/20).
BBQ is strongly supported as a building amenity. It appears in the MLS for 20/20 listings and is repeatedly confirmed in remarks by multiple agents, which makes this one of the most reliable features for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash is not supported by the public remarks, and the historical MLS signal is weak compared with the many other confirmed amenities. Because there is no mention across numerous listings, this is best treated as a correction to false/unsupported MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Doorman service is supported by multiple public remarks, including direct mentions of "doorman," "24-hour door man," and "24-hours concierge and security." The MLS checkbox is much less consistent than the remarks, but the wording appears in more than one listing and indicates a staffed lobby attendant is present. This is strong enough to include as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Meeting room availability is strongly supported by the MLS and confirmed in remarks. Listings specifically call out a "private meeting room" and "meeting room," suggesting this is a genuine shared building amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
Evidence is extremely strong for patio/deck-type outdoor space in this building. Across the provided remarks, well over 20 listings reference lanais/decks or outdoor areas, including phrases like “wraparound lanai,” “covered lanai,” “open lanai,” and “two private lanais.” This looks consistent across multiple agents and is not isolated copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation-area evidence is solid and appears across multiple listings, including phrases like "recreation space," "recreation area with barbeque," and "recreation deck." The MLS support is not universal, but the remarks consistently point to a shared amenity area.
No analysis available
Restaurant access appears to be a real building feature, though not universal across all listings. Multiple remarks mention restaurants downstairs or in the lobby, which aligns with the MLS evidence and supports it as a buyer-relevant amenity.
No analysis available
Sauna is well supported and repeatedly confirmed in the remarks. The feature appears across multiple listings with direct language, making it a reliable building amenity.
Storage appears to be available in the building, but the evidence is moderate rather than explicit. Across the current listings, 6/20 reference storage in amenities and 4/20 in unit features, while remarks mostly describe in-unit storage such as 'ample storage' and 'added cabinet system' rather than shared storage lockers. This looks like a partially checked MLS feature with some agent copy/paste risk, so confidence is moderate.
I searched the public remarks for surfboard-storage-related amenities such as surf storage, board storage, or bike and surfboard storage. Nothing in the listings indicates that this building offers surfboard storage.
Tennis court access is well supported. The amenity appears in most MLS listings and is directly named in multiple public remarks, making this a reliable building feature.
Trash chute appears to be a confirmed building-wide amenity based on the MLS data. The absence of frequent mention in remarks does not outweigh the 20/20 MLS consistency, so this should remain included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/hot tub/spa is strongly supported across the listings. Agents consistently describe it using different but matching terms like "Jacuzzi," "hot tub," and "spa," which reinforces that this is a shared amenity.
Pool is overwhelmingly confirmed for Canterbury Place. Current remarks across many listings explicitly mention a pool, swimming pool, heated pool, jacuzzi/whirlpool, and pool & spa, with references appearing in dozens of descriptions from multiple agents. The evidence is strong and consistent, not just copy-paste checkbox data.
Multiple recent listings describe the building’s amenities as including a 'heated pool,' often alongside jacuzzi, sauna, BBQ, and pickleball. At least 8 of the 20 listings explicitly use the phrase 'heated pool' or 'spa-like amenities such as heated pool,' indicating this is a well-established, building-wide feature. Despite the MLS checkbox not being consistently used, the repetition across many agents and listings confirms the pool is heated.
I looked for wording like salt water pool, saltwater pool, salt pool, or saline pool. The listings repeatedly mention a pool, heated pool, jacuzzi, and spa, but never indicate that the pool is salt water.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listing set and appears in multiple independent remarks, not just one-off copy. At least 6 current listings explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit or in-unit laundry, including phrases like "includes in unit Washer-Dryer," "washer and dryer located in the unit," and "full sized washer and dryer in residence." This aligns with the prior MLS pattern of 18/20 listings showing washer/dryer inclusions, so the feature should be retained with very high confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit indications that a shared laundry room requires payment, such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees. The remarks instead reference in-unit laundry, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on every floor," "laundry room on each floor," or similar community-laundry wording. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer or washer/dryer hookups, which does not support floor-level community laundry.
No analysis available
Assigned/reserved parking is very well supported across the listings. Roughly 17 of 20 MLS records show assigned parking, and multiple remarks explicitly confirm it with phrases like "one assigned covered parking stall" and "2 rare covered parking stalls." The consistency across many agents suggests this is a building-level feature, not a one-off copy-paste error.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed by the MLS data and the remarks. Nearly every listing supports it, with repeated language such as "one covered parking stall," "secured garage parking," and "prime-covered parking stall in a secured garage." This is consistent enough to treat as a building feature with very high confidence.
I searched the remarks for deeded/owned parking language such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The listings consistently describe assigned or covered stalls, but that is not enough to पुष्टिably confirm deeded ownership from public remarks alone. Because there is no explicit wording, this remains unknown.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like "parking fee," "monthly parking charge," "parking rental," or any added cost for parking. The remarks only mention parking stalls and secured/covered parking, with no separate fee language found. That means there is no public-remark evidence to confirm a parking fee.
Guest parking is supported by fewer listings than assigned or covered parking, but it is explicitly mentioned in the remarks. The strongest direct evidence is the note that "the guest parking is plentiful," which aligns with the MLS guest-parking checkboxes appearing in a meaningful minority of records. Confidence is high, though not as strong as the core parking features.
Secured-entry parking is well supported by the building remarks and MLS history. Multiple listings reference a "secured building," "secured garage parking," "24-hour security," and gated/controlled access language, indicating parking security is a real shared feature. The evidence is consistent across agents and not limited to a single listing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for wording such as "waitlist," "waiting list," or instructions to join a parking queue. None of the listings reference any waitlist system for parking. Based on the available remarks, there is no evidence to confirm that the building uses one.
No analysis available
I searched for key card, fob access, card reader, electronic access, or keycard entry. The public remarks support general security features, but they do not specifically mention card-based access control.
Security guard service is strongly supported across the listings. At least a dozen remarks explicitly mention it with phrases like "24-hour security," "24 hours security guard," and "24hr security," and the MLS data already shows 18/20 listings checked for security. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and looks like a real building-level feature, not a copy-paste error.
I looked for wording like security patrol, roving security, patrolled building, or patrol service. The remarks reference 24-hour security, security guards, and doorman service, but not a patrol operation.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for central air conditioning. Dozens of current remarks explicitly reference "central A/C" or "central AC," often noting that the maintenance fee includes it, which aligns with the previously high-confidence MLS data. The feature is consistently described across many listings and agents, making this a very reliable building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is very strongly supported across the building's MLS history. Current data shows 18/20 listings marked as CONCRE, which is consistent with a building-wide feature rather than a one-off unit note. The public remarks do not directly discuss construction, but they also do not undermine the strong MLS evidence.
Double-wall construction appears in 7/20 MLS listings, suggesting this may be a real building feature or a feature used inconsistently in agent data. None of the public remarks explicitly confirm or deny it, so this remains moderate-confidence evidence only. The pattern looks more like partial MLS support than a clearly verified building description.
No analysis available
Limited MLS checkbox presence (6 of 20 listings list MASSTU) but no supporting language in any public remarks. Because masonry/stucco is not described in agent remarks and historical confidence is not established, there is insufficient evidence to assert the building is masonry+stucco.
No analysis available
Concrete slab foundation is only weak-to-moderately supported by MLS data, with 5/20 listings showing SLAB. The public remarks are silent on foundation type, so there is no direct confirmation from listing text. This looks like a feature that may apply to some listings or may be inconsistently entered by agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six listings explicitly flag ABOGRO in construction_materials, and all remarks depict a traditional above-ground high-rise with numerous upper-floor and penthouse units. No listing suggests subterranean or partially earth-sheltered construction, so it is reasonable to treat Canterbury Place as an above-ground constructed building despite inconsistent MLS checkbox usage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks repeatedly establish a 30-day minimum rental policy. That means short-term rentals are prohibited in this building.
I searched for hotel pool language such as hotel rental program, branded management, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool references, or similar. None were found, and since short-term rentals are not allowed, this must be false.
I looked for wording like mandatory rental pool, required participation, or cannot opt out and found none. Because STR is not allowed and there is no evidence of a pool program, this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The leasehold expiration year is repeatedly stated as 2051 across the remarks. No later extension date appears, so 2051 is the best-supported value.
Public remarks directly confirm VA financing is available/assumable in this building. The signal appears multiple times, so this is very high confidence.
The remarks explicitly and repeatedly state that the unit is "100% insured for Hurricane Insurance," which is strong evidence of full insurance coverage. This is consistent with the feature definition for fully insured / walls-in coverage, so I set this to true with very high confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for direct references to fire/life safety approval, passing inspection, or compliance statements, but nothing appeared in the listings. Because this feature is only determined from public remarks and there is no evidence either way, it remains unknown.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are consistently supported across the building, with essentially every listing reinforcing the feature. Remarks include phrases like "stunning Diamond Head and ocean views," "panoramic views of the Pacific Ocean," and "wrap-around Pacific Ocean views," suggesting this is a core building-level selling point rather than an isolated unit feature.
Mountain views are well supported in the remarks. Listings mention “verdant mountain ridge lines,” “mountain view on the other side,” “mountains,” and “looks out toward the cool mountains,” confirming that the building offers mountain-facing units. Evidence is repeated across different listings and stacks.
Diamond Head views are repeatedly confirmed across many listings and multiple agents. The wording is consistent and explicit, indicating this is a well-established feature of the building rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
City views are clearly supported by both historical data and current remarks. Multiple listings reference city lights or direct city views, and the consistency across remarks suggests the building offers city-view units in addition to ocean-facing units.
Coastline/shoreline views are explicitly mentioned in at least one listing and implied in several panoramic ocean-facing descriptions. While less frequent than ocean or Diamond Head, the evidence is sufficient to keep this feature true for the building.
Garden-style or greenery views are only moderately supported, and the language is more often park/landscape oriented than explicit "garden view." Still, several remarks reference lush greenery and verdant park outlooks, so the feature appears to exist for some units in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunrise views are supported by explicit unit remarks, not just inference. The strongest evidence is the listing stating the residence "captures sunrise to sunset views," which is a direct confirmation of sunrise-oriented views in at least some units.
Sunset views are clearly supported, though not as universally as ocean or Diamond Head. Multiple listings mention sunset skies, fireworks, and westward orientation, indicating that some units enjoy strong sunset exposure and related evening views.
No analysis available
This feature is strongly supported by multiple listings that directly say units have fireworks views from the lanai or home. The remarks clearly describe viewing the Friday night fireworks from the building, not just being near them.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is supported by multiple listings and does not appear to be a one-off copy/paste error. At least 2 remarks explicitly say "resident manager," including one that pairs it with "24 hour security and a resident manager" and another describing the building as having "24 hour security and a resident manager." This aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS history, so the feature should be kept.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.