Camelot
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Camelot
Building Overview
Camelot in Downtown-Chinatown — concrete building (1973) with pool and ocean, mountain and Diamond Head views.
About Camelot
Based on MLS data, Camelot is a residential building located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood. Built in 1973, the structure is constructed of concrete. Size and unit mix information were not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, building amenities include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. Units use window air conditioning, and the building advertises ocean, mountain, and Diamond Head views.
MLS data indicate parking is available, covered, assigned, and there is guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Prospective buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or management, as this summary is based solely on MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy clues in the remarks, including explicit percentages or phrases like majority/highly owner-occupied, but found none. Mentions of homeowners, investors, and tenant-occupied units do not provide enough evidence to estimate the building's owner-occupancy rate.
I looked for an explicit elevator count in the public remarks and only found references to elevator upgrades, replacement, and access. Since no number is stated, the actual number of elevators remains unknown from these remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable/internet inclusion is strongly supported across the remarks. Multiple listings explicitly say maintenance fees include 'basic cable/internet' or 'basic internet and cable,' matching the high MLS confidence (18/20 CABTV). This looks consistent across different agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
Common area electricity appears to be included based mainly on MLS checkbox data: 16 of 20 listings have OTCOEX marked. None of the public remarks explicitly call out common area electric, so this is supported by MLS patterns rather than direct agent language.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clear confirmation across agent remarks and MLS: at least 9 listings explicitly say 'hot water' or 'hot water included' is part of the HOA fee. MLS HOTWAT is also checked on many listings, supporting a high-confidence inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is very well corroborated. Several remarks explicitly say fees include 'water and sewer' or list 'sewer' in the maintenance fee breakdown, aligning with the near-universal MLS indicator (19/20). The evidence is consistent and strong across multiple listings.
Water inclusion is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. Numerous listings say fees include 'water,' 'hot water, water,' or similar phrasing, and the MLS checkbox is set on 18/20 listings. This is consistent across multiple agents and appears reliable.
BBQ facilities are mentioned in many listings, often with specific detail such as 'BBQ area,' 'five BBQ pits,' 'BBQ areas,' and 'barbecue area.' The consistency across numerous remarks suggests this is a real shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate-to-strong evidence: 9 of 20 MLS listings include car wash in amenities and multiple public remarks explicitly mention a 'car wash area' or 'car wash facility' on the ground floor. The repeated remarks across different listings support including this building-level amenity.
There is not enough direct evidence for a clubhouse/community center at The Camelot. The remarks instead repeatedly reference a recreation room, party room, or meeting room with a kitchen, which does not clearly establish a true clubhouse amenity. Because the checkbox appears only in a small minority of listings and the descriptions are not explicit, this feature is best treated as not confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly describe a shared exercise amenity, including 'gym,' 'fitness center,' 'work out room,' and 'fitness room.' This is consistent across many agents and aligns with the very strong current MLS amenity data, so the building clearly offers a shared exercise room/fitness center.
No analysis available
Moderate evidence: roughly 10 of 20 MLS listings list a meeting/meeting-room type amenity and several remarks (2–4 listings) explicitly mention 'meeting room', 'party room', or 'recreation/meeting rooms with full kitchen'. The mentions are fewer than for other amenities but are consistent enough to include the feature for buyers searching for meeting/conference space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks describe the amenities as being located on the '4th floor rec area' and call out a 'recreation deck.' That language appears in multiple listings, indicating a shared recreation area rather than a unit-specific feature.
Several listings explicitly reference a shared recreation room, sometimes described as a 'party room with kitchen,' 'meeting room with full kitchen,' or 'game room.' The repeated, detailed descriptions across multiple agents support that the building has a true recreation room amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is one of the most consistently mentioned amenities, appearing in many remarks as 'sauna,' 'saunas,' or 'newly remodeled sauna.' The repeated references across different listings strongly support a shared sauna amenity in the building.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to surfboard storage, board storage, or surf storage and found none. The remarks do mention other storage-related features like covered parking storage and bicycle racks, but not surfboard storage.
No analysis available
The MLS checkbox data suggests trash chute access is present in many listings, but the public remarks do not directly confirm it. This looks like a plausible building amenity from the MLS pattern, though the evidence is weaker than for the other features because the remarks are silent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings and remarks confirm a whirlpool/hot tub: 10 of 20 MLS listings list the amenity and many public remarks say 'whirlpool', 'jacuzzi', or 'hot tub' often paired with the pool (e.g., 'sparkling pool and whirlpool', 'jacuzzi'). The repeated agent descriptions indicate a building-level whirlpool/jacuzzi amenity.
The evidence is overwhelming that The Camelot has a pool. Well over 20 listings mention it in public remarks, with phrases like 'pool,' 'swimming pool,' 'sparkling pool,' and 'saltwater swimming pool,' usually as part of the shared amenity package. The consistency across many listings suggests this is a real building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
Little to no evidence that the pool is heated: 0 of the provided public remarks mention 'heated' or equivalent; MLS pool_features show 0/20 with HEATED and only 1/20 has HEAPOO checked. Given the lack of corroborating remarks, there is low confidence that the pool is heated.
This is directly supported by public remarks identifying the pool as saltwater. That is explicit evidence that the building has a salt water pool.
Evidence is very strong that this building offers in-unit laundry. Multiple listings explicitly mention "in-unit washer and dryer" or equivalent wording, and the MLS inclusions are nearly unanimous at 19/20. This looks consistent across agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating paid laundry such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees. The remarks do not mention any community laundry payment setup, so there is no public-remarks evidence for this feature.
I searched the public remarks for explicit references to community laundry being available on each floor, such as 'laundry on every floor' or 'laundry room on each floor,' and found none. The listings mention in-unit washer/dryer and other amenities, but nothing confirming shared laundry facilities by floor.
No analysis available
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported across the building. Multiple current remarks explicitly say "assigned parking stall" or describe a specific stall location, and the MLS history already shows 18 of 20 listings marked assigned. This looks like consistent building-level information rather than isolated agent copy.
Covered parking is clearly offered in the building. Many listings mention covered stalls, garage-level parking, or secured covered parking, and the MLS history already supports this with 14 of 20 records. The repeated wording across different remarks suggests this is a stable building amenity.
I searched for deeded/owned parking language such as 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in deed.' The listings consistently describe an included or assigned stall, but none explicitly state that the parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any additional parking cost language, including 'parking fee,' 'monthly parking charge,' or 'parking rental.' The remarks only say parking is included or assigned, so no fee can be confirmed.
Guest parking is well supported by both historical MLS data and current remarks. Numerous listings mention guest/visitor parking, often with counts such as "10+ guest stalls," "a dozen guest parking spaces," and "14+ guest parking spaces." This is consistent across multiple agents and not just a single copied remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' and similar queue language. The remarks instead suggest parking is available with the unit and guest parking is plentiful, with no evidence of a waitlist.
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe FOB or controlled access security, which is strong evidence of card/fob entry. Public remarks also reference secured entry, reinforcing that the building has a card-based access system.
Strong, repeated evidence across the listings supports security guard service at Camelot. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "evening security," "24/7 security," "overnight security patrol," "security guard on patrol," "night security officer," and a "security guards desk," which is consistent across several agents rather than a one-off copy/paste note. This aligns with the already high MLS confidence and confirms the feature should remain true.
The listings repeatedly reference patrol-type security service, including evening security patrol and a guard on patrol. This is strong public-remarks evidence that the building has security patrol coverage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is strong that some units in The Camelot have window air conditioning. One listing explicitly says "window air conditioner," and current MLS data shows ACWIUN in 13 of 20 listings, which is consistent with a building-level feature available in some units. The remarks do not look like a one-off copy/paste error because the MLS checkbox data also supports it.
Strong building-level evidence supports concrete construction. The current MLS data is highly consistent at 19 of 20 listings, and the remarks across many listings repeatedly reference the same Camelot building with extensive upgrades, which fits a concrete high-rise. There is no credible contrary evidence suggesting a different construction type.
Although 9 of 20 MLS records currently list 'double wall' as a material, no public remarks (0 mentions) reference double-wall construction or equivalent phrases. With no corroborating remarks and no prior verification, the most likely explanation is inconsistent checkbox usage by agents, so the feature is omitted pending direct owner/site verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence does not support a slab foundation for the building. Only 3 of 20 current listings show SLAB, and the remarks across many listings never mention a concrete slab or foundation detail. This is high-confidence correction territory, so the feature should be omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is moderate but not explicit evidence for above-ground construction. The MLS data shows the ABOGRO code in 5 of 20 listings, and the remarks consistently describe a multi-story building with elevators, parking levels, and high-floor units. Because the remarks do not directly state this feature, confidence is only moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for STR indicators such as 'short-term rental allowed,' 'NUC,' 'TVU,' or hotel-style rental permissions. No such language appears in the remarks, and there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I searched for hotel-pool terms like 'hotel rental pool,' 'managed by hotel,' or branded pool references such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz. Nothing in the remarks indicates a hotel rental pool program, so this is false.
I looked for wording that would indicate required participation in a rental pool, such as 'mandatory,' 'cannot opt out,' or 'must be in the program.' Since there is no evidence of any hotel rental pool, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for a 4-digit lease end year, extension date, or ground lease expiration language like 'expires 2050' or 'renewed through 2075.' The remarks confirm leasehold status but do not specify when the lease expires, so the year cannot be extracted.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA financing language such as 'VA approved' or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. The financing mentions that do appear are seller financing and general financing, which are not the same as VA approval.
The public remarks repeatedly and explicitly confirm full building insurance coverage. This is strong evidence that the HOA has walls-in/full coverage insurance, so this feature should be marked true.
No analysis available
I searched for language indicating FLSE passed, fire/life safety compliance, or a successful fire inspection and found none. The remarks discuss plumbing, elevators, spalling, repainting, and security, but nothing about fire/life safety evaluation status.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are clearly supported across the building, with multiple listings explicitly advertising them. Current remarks repeatedly mention 'ocean views,' 'ocean and city skyline,' and 'Diamond Head & Ocean View,' which is consistent with the high historical confidence and suggests the data is not just a one-off agent error.
Mountain views are well supported by both historical MLS data and current listing remarks. Multiple agents mention them independently, including references to the Ko'olau range, mauka/mountain breezes, and combined city/mountain outlooks.
Diamond Head views appear consistently across the listing set and are described in multiple ways. The repeated explicit mentions across different remarks make this a reliable building-level feature rather than copied MLS checkbox data.
City views are one of the most consistently advertised features in the building, appearing in a large majority of the remarks. The phrasing varies but the signal is very strong, with several listings independently calling out city, skyline, and urban views.
Coastline views have weaker evidence than the other view types. No remark explicitly says 'coastline' or 'shoreline,' but current MLS data shows a few listings tagged with coastline-related view descriptions and some ocean horizon language suggests at least some units may capture that type of view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
While CURRENT MLS view_descriptions show SUNSET in 0 of 20 listings, a few public remarks explicitly mention enjoying “the colors of the sky during sundown” and similar wording. Because mentions are present but not widespread across listings, there is moderate confidence that some units offer sunset/western exposures.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit statements about fireworks views from the building, such as seeing fireworks from the lanai or unit. The listings describe ocean, city, mountain, and Diamond Head views, but nothing about fireworks viewing.
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a resident/on-site manager. Multiple current listings explicitly mention it across different remarks—examples include "on-site manager," "on-site resident manager," and "daytime site manager on duty"—supporting the existing high-confidence historical record. This appears consistently across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.