Cabana at Waikiki

All available MLS records for this building consistently show a construction year of 1965, with no conflicting data. Remarks mention that all units were gutted and remodeled in 2008 and some were further renovated in 2010 and 2015, but these are renovations, not new construction. Thus, 1965 is taken as the original build year with high confidence.

No remarks state the total number of stories, but MLS property data shows units on floors 2, 3, and 4, with 4 as the highest observed floor. Following the guideline to use the highest FloorNumber when no other data is available, the building is inferred to have 4 floors. There is no evidence contradicting this estimate.

The remarks focus on unit features and location but never reference how many units are in the Cabana at Waikiki (such as '20-unit building' or similar). Without any explicit or implicit unit-count information, the total number of units cannot be determined. Any numerical value here would be a guess, so it is left as unknown.

The remarks emphasize legal short-term rental use and investment potential but do not state any owner-occupancy percentage (no phrases like '80% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied'). Per the rule to keep existing numeric values when remarks do not mention the field, the current value of 6.00 is retained with low confidence.

The public remarks state 'Boutique 4-story WALK UP building', which directly implies there are no elevators. Given this explicit language in multiple remarks, set elevators to 0 with high confidence.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

No listing remarks reference central air conditioning being included in the maintenance fee, and 0 of 5 MLS records mark ACCEN in association_fee_includes. Given central AC inclusion is a major selling point that agents typically highlight, it is very likely not included in the fees.

MLS checkboxes indicate cable is included in 5 of 6 current listings (no remarks mention cable specifically). Evidence is implied from multiple agent-entered listings rather than explicit remarks, so confidence is moderate (0.80).

Association fee appears to include common area electricity in 5 of 6 MLS listings and historical data was high-confidence. Remarks reference shared amenities (onsite laundry, community area) but not utilities; combined evidence across multiple listings supports inclusion (high confidence).

All public remarks emphasize that the units are 'fee simple' short-term rentals, not cooperative ownership. With 0 of 5 MLS entries marking COOTAX and the ownership type clearly stated, cooperative taxes are effectively ruled out as part of the fees.

None of the current MLS listings indicate ELECTR under association_fee_includes, and the public remarks are silent on electricity being covered. This consistent absence across all listings strongly suggests unit electricity is not included in the maintenance fee.

No listings show GAS selected in association_fee_includes and the remarks never reference gas service or gas-inclusive fees. This pattern makes it highly likely that gas is not included in the maintenance fees (and may not be present at all).

No MLS listings indicate hot water is included (0 of 6), and 2 listings list a water heater (WTRHTR) as a unit inclusion. With prior high confidence and unit-level water heaters, evidence strongly supports that hot water is NOT included in the maintenance fee.

Internet service appears in association_fee_includes for 2 of 6 MLS listings; none of the public remarks explicitly state 'internet included.' Because some listings list it (but it's not consistently checked or mentioned), inclusion is marked true with moderate confidence (0.72).

The building is marketed for its Waikiki location near the beach, parks, and the zoo, with no mention of marina access or boat facilities. With no MLS indication of MARINA in any listing, marina fees or access are essentially ruled out as part of the HOA.

SEWER is checked on 5 of 6 current MLS listings and prior data had high confidence; remarks are silent but consistent MLS entries across multiple agents support that sewer is included in the association fee (high confidence).

WATER is indicated as included in the association fee on 5 of 6 MLS listings and historical data was high-confidence. Although remarks don't explicitly state 'water included,' the consistent MLS checkbox entries across multiple listings indicate water is included (high confidence).

At least 5 of the 6 recent listing remarks mention building BBQ/grill facilities, with quotes like “patio and BBQ area,” “a grill for some BBQs,” and “onsite ... grill.” The references are consistent across multiple listings/agents, so evidence is strong that the building offers shared BBQ/grilling amenities.

Across 5 listings, there are no references to bike storage, bicycle rooms, or bike racks, and the MLS bike-storage amenity box is never checked. Since agents otherwise detail the available amenities, the absence of any bike-storage mention strongly suggests the building does not provide dedicated bicycle storage facilities.

Remarks focus on proximity to beaches, parks, zoo, and Waikiki attractions, with no reference to boating or dock facilities. Location context and lack of MLS support strongly indicate there is no boat dock or marina access associated with the building.

Amenities described are limited to onsite laundry, a grill/BBQ, and a community area, with no reference to car-care facilities. The absence of mention across 5 listings and in MLS suggests there is no car wash amenity.

A clubhouse would normally be highlighted, but none of the 5 remarks reference a clubhouse or similar facility. With no MLS indication either, it is very likely there is no clubhouse at this building.

Five independent listings omit any mention of concierge or front-desk services, and the MLS concierge field is not selected on any of them. This supports that the building does not offer concierge service.

Across all remarks there is no reference to pet-specific amenities like a dog park or pet run. With zero MLS indications, it is very likely the building does not have a dog park or designated pet area.

None of the five listings describe a doorman or lobby attendant, and the MLS doorman checkbox is consistently unset. This pattern indicates the building does not provide doorman services.

Across 5 listings, there are no references to an exercise room, gym, fitness center, or similar facility. Given that other amenities (laundry, grill, community area) are repeatedly highlighted and MLS checkboxes are all unset, it is very likely there is no exercise room in this building.

The building is marketed as a small vacation rental property, not a full-service luxury high-rise, and no transportation or chauffeur services are mentioned. With zero MLS support, it is very likely there is no limo or house car service.

The only common space described is a general community area for relaxing, not for meetings or conferences. The lack of any mention of meeting facilities and no MLS checkbox support indicate there is no dedicated meeting room.

Multiple agent remarks (5 of 6 listings) explicitly reference an outdoor amenity: phrases include "patio and BBQ area," "open tropical community area," and repeated mentions of a "grill" and "community area." Historical MLS checkbox data showed 3/6 listings with PATDEC/COVPAT and prior confidence was Medium, but the consistent current remarks from different listings provide strong evidence the building offers a shared patio/deck area.

While the building is close to beaches and parks, the remarks never describe any dedicated jogging or walking paths on the property. With no MLS indication either, it is very likely there is no designated jogging/walking path amenity.

The building is marketed primarily as a short-term vacation rental property, and no remarks mention playgrounds or children’s play structures. The combination of usage type and lack of any textual or MLS evidence indicates there is no playground.

All remarks refer only to a shared 'community area' and do not mention any private or fenced yards attached to units. Given the dense Waikiki setting and consistent focus on common space, it is very unlikely that any units have a true private yard.

A putting green would be an unusual but highly marketable feature and would almost certainly be advertised if present. Its complete absence from 5 listings and MLS amenities strongly suggests the building has no putting green.

Remarks refer to “an open tropical community area to relax and unwind,” “a lovely community area to relax and unwind,” and simply “community area” as part of the amenities. This consistent description across multiple listings matches a shared recreation/amenity area for residents and guests.

The building is said to have a “community area,” but there are no mentions of a rec room, game room, or multi-purpose room. With no MLS checks or textual evidence of a dedicated recreation room, it is very likely this amenity does not exist.

The remarks emphasize being “close to…restaurants” in Waikiki, clearly referring to the neighborhood rather than in-building dining. With no direct mention of an in-building restaurant and no MLS support, the property does not appear to have its own restaurant.

Rooftop decks are highly marketable in Waikiki and would be prominently advertised if present, yet they are never mentioned in 5 separate remarks. Combined with the absence of the ROOFDCK amenity in MLS, this strongly suggests there are no rooftop amenities.

Across all remarks, there is no indication of a sauna, steam room, or similar wellness facility. Given this and the absence of the SAUNA amenity in MLS, it is very likely the building does not offer a sauna.

None of the 5 listings mention storage units, lockers, or extra storage, and the MLS amenities data shows storage is unchecked on all of them. Agents repeatedly describe the same amenity set—onsite laundry, grill/BBQ, and community area—without any storage reference, indicating the building likely has no dedicated storage units for residents.

The remarks describe onsite laundry, a grill/BBQ area, and a community area but do not reference any surfboard or board storage facilities. I specifically looked for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', and 'surf storage' and found none. In the absence of any mention, it is more likely the building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.

Tennis courts are typically prominently advertised, yet none of the 5 remarks reference tennis or courts of any kind. Combined with the absence of the TENCOU amenity in MLS, this strongly indicates there is no tennis court at the property.

In a small building where other basic conveniences like laundry and grill are noted, the absence of any mention of trash chutes suggests they are not present. With no MLS indication, it is very likely the building does not have a trash chute system.

Parking is described only as a 'dedicated Parking Space' with no reference to valet or related services. In combination with the lack of a VALET amenity flag in the MLS across all listings, this strongly indicates the building does not offer valet service.

The first set of remarks describes the property as a "gated building," implying a fenced or gated perimeter. This, combined with at least one MLS entry marking GATED/WALFEN, supports that the building has a gate or fencing as a physical boundary.

A whirlpool or hot tub would be a key selling point but is never referenced in any of the 5 listings. The total lack of textual or MLS evidence indicates the building does not have a whirlpool amenity.

None of the 5 listings mention a pool, swimming pool, or any similar feature, despite detailed amenity descriptions (onsite laundry, grill, community area). MLS data also shows 0/5 listings with any pool-related amenity checked, suggesting the building does not offer a pool.

Because no listings indicate the presence of a pool at all, there is no indication of a heated pool. Both MLS checkbox data (0/5 for pool and heated pool) and remarks are silent on any such feature, strongly supporting that there is no heated pool in this building.

The public remarks describe location, remodels, laundry, grill, community area, and vacation-rental status but do not mention any type of pool. Specifically, there are no references to a saltwater, saline, or salt system pool. In the absence of any such mentions, this feature is marked as not present based on the remarks.

None of the 5 listings advertise in-unit laundry, and all references to laundry describe it as 'onsite' or building facilities, not inside the units. Given that agents routinely highlight in-unit washers/dryers when present, this consistent pattern strongly suggests units in this building do not offer in‑unit laundry.

All 6 current listings have the community laundry amenity checked and multiple agent remarks state onsite/shared laundry (phrases include 'onsite laundry facilities' and 'There is onsite laundry'). Evidence is consistent across listings and matches the historical High confidence, indicating the building offers shared laundry facilities.

The listings do not specify any payment system for the community laundry, such as coins, cards, or laundry fees. Searched for 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card operated', 'paid laundry', and related terms but found no evidence that use of the laundry requires payment.

Listings confirm the presence of onsite community laundry but never mention laundry on every floor or floor-by-floor laundry rooms. Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and similar, but found no such references, so it is unlikely this feature exists.

At least one listing advertises parking, stating the unit comes “with Parking included” and that “a dedicated Parking Space is included.” This aligns with MLS checkbox data showing 1 of 5 units with parking while others are marked NONE, indicating a limited number of building stalls rather than an agent copy-paste error.

Multiple agent remarks across listings explicitly advertise deeded or dedicated parking: phrases include 'DEEDED PARKING', 'dedicated Parking Space is included', and 'Parking included' (appears in several listing remarks). This is consistent across different agent remarks and aligns with prior MLS ASSIGN flags, so strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking for at least some units.

MLS checkbox data indicate covered/garage parking for some units (2 of 6 listings flagged COVERE/GARAGE), but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'covered', 'garage', or 'carport'. Given the MLS codes but lack of remark confirmation, include covered parking with moderate confidence (implied rather than explicitly described in agent remarks).

Multiple remarks directly reference deeded parking (e.g., 'RARE LEGAL SHORT-TERM RENTAL + DEEDED PARKING' and 'a dedicated Parking Space is included'), supporting high-confidence true.

Across five listings, there is no mention of EV charging and MLS shows no EVCHRG checkbox selected. Given that such an amenity is usually strongly marketed, it is very likely the building does not offer EV charging stations.

Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental' and similar terms; none were found. Since a dedicated/deeded space is included, no monthly fee is described.

Agents do not reference guest or visitor parking in any listing, and the GUEST checkbox is never used. This consistent absence across multiple agents and listings indicates the building does not provide designated guest parking.

At least one listing remark explicitly describes the property as a 'gated building', providing direct language indicating secured entry. While not many listings repeat this, the explicit 'gated' description in agent remarks supports including secured/gated parking access for the building with high confidence.

No listing describes tandem parking and MLS never marks TANDEM, despite one unit highlighting its dedicated stall. The consistent omission indicates the building’s parking, where provided, is not configured as tandem stalls.

Across all listings, there is no suggestion of valet or attended parking, and MLS data confirms no VALET checkbox usage. This provides high confidence that the building does not offer valet parking.

Searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list for parking', and similar phrases; no references found, so set to false with low-moderate confidence.

Across five sets of remarks, there is no reference to an elevator, key access, or fob-controlled lifts, and MLS data shows 0/5 for the elevator amenity. This strongly suggests the building does not have a keyed or restricted-access elevator.

Searched remarks for terms like key card, fob access, card reader, electronic or keycard entry and found none. A gated building alone does not confirm a card/fob system, so this feature is assumed not present based on available information.

Across five listings, no agent remarks reference a security guard or on-site security personnel. MLS amenities for all five listings also leave the security-guard field unchecked, suggesting the building does not offer staffed guard services.

Looked for references to security patrols or roving security services and found no evidence. In the absence of any mention, it is likely there is no formal security patrol at this building.

None of the five listings describe security cameras or video monitoring, and MLS amenities do not indicate a security system on any listing. Given the consistent omission, it is likely the building does not have a notable video security system.

Across 5 listings, none check any central AC option and no remarks reference central air or HVAC. Multiple listings instead show window AC as the cooling type, indicating the building relies on individual window units rather than a central system.

None of the 5 listings indicate split or ductless AC in the MLS checkboxes or in remarks. Where AC is indicated, it is specified as window-type, not split systems, so split AC is very unlikely to be available in this building.

Five of six current MLS listings list ACWIUN (window AC) in the inclusions, and historical data showed high confidence this building has window units. The provided public remarks do not explicitly mention air conditioning, but the repeated ACWIUN checkbox across multiple listings—despite some risk of agent copy/paste—constitutes strong evidence that some units have window air conditioning.

All 6 current MLS listings mark the building as concrete construction (CONCRE). Public remarks do not explicitly state construction material but contain no contrary statements; historical records also consistently indicated a concrete building, so evidence is strong and consistent across agents.

There are no mentions of double-wall construction in any public remarks and historical MLS records did not indicate double-wall construction. The single current DOUWAL checkbox appears anomalous across 6 listings and is not supported by agent remarks.

Hollow tile is never mentioned in remarks and is not selected in any construction_materials fields (0 of 5 for HOLTIL, 5 of 5 for CONCRE). Given MLS patterns and the typical construction type for this building, it is very unlikely that hollow tile is the designated structural construction type here.

Two independent listings check MASSTU (masonry/stucco) in addition to concrete, suggesting a concrete/masonry structure with stucco exterior, which is common for Waikiki walk-up/low-rise condos. While not every agent marked it, there is enough recurring MLS indication and no opposing evidence to conclude the building likely has masonry/stucco construction elements.

No public remarks reference steel framing and historical MLS data consistently indicated non-steel (concrete) construction. Only 1 of 6 current listings checked STEFRA, which appears isolated and likely a copy/paste or data-entry error rather than a real structural change.

Remarks describe a typical Waikiki condo building and all MLS entries show concrete construction, which strongly implies a concrete slab foundation despite the unchecked SLAB box. Based on local construction norms for this building type and the absence of any suggestion of a raised foundation, a slab foundation is likely.

No analysis available

No listing remarks mention wood frame construction, and 0 of 5 MLS entries check WOOFRA while all check CONCRE. Given the consistent identification of the structure as concrete and typical local building practices, it is very unlikely that the building is wood-frame constructed.

No public remarks describe an above-ground or raised foundation and historical MLS data did not mark ABOGRO. The lone ABOGRO checkbox among 6 listings is isolated and not corroborated by remarks or prior data, so it is likely erroneous.

Across all listings there is no mention of brick or brick-and-mortar construction, and 0 of 5 agents checked BRICK while all checked concrete. In the Waikiki condo context this makes true brick construction highly unlikely.

No listing references single-wall or traditional Hawaiian single-wall construction, and all MLS data instead indicate concrete. Given the building type and age implied by the full-gut remodels and Waikiki condo context, single-wall construction is virtually certain not to apply here.

Remarks repeatedly confirm legal short-term/vacation rental status (e.g., 'RARE LEGAL SHORT-TERM RENTAL', 'fee simple, short-term vacation rental', 'required DPP STVR registration'), so STR allowed = true with high confidence.

Listings mention flexible management and specific rental companies (e.g., 'Alii Beach Rental', 'current short-term rental company') and offer owner self-management, with no hotel pool language, so hotel pool participation is false.

Because owners 'can choose to manage himself or continue with the current short-term rental company' and listings state flexible options, participation in any rental pool is not mandatory; set to false with high confidence.

Every provided listing (5/5) clearly states that the unit is fee simple, using phrases like 'fee simple, short-term vacation rental' and 'fee simple fully furnished turnkey unit'. No listing hints at any other tenure type. This strongly indicates that the Cabana at Waikiki offers fee simple ownership, and currently all observed listings are fee simple (5 fee simple, 0 leasehold).

None of the remarks use leasehold-related terms such as 'leasehold', 'LH', 'lease rent', or lease expiration dates, while all 5 listings repeatedly emphasize that the units are 'fee simple'. In typical Waikiki CPRs, this consistent pattern across multiple listings indicates a fee simple project rather than a mixed-tenure building. Given this, it is highly likely that there are no leasehold units in this building (5 fee simple, 0 leasehold observed).

Remarks state the unit is fee simple (e.g., 'fee simple, short-term vacation rental'), therefore no land lease expiry year is applicable.

Searched remarks for terms like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found no references. In absence of explicit mention, set to false with moderate-low confidence.

I searched the public remarks for explicit HOA/building insurance language such as 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', or 'comprehensive building insurance' and found none. With no explicit statement, this is set to false with medium confidence.

The remarks focus on short-term rental status, renovations, and amenities like onsite laundry, grill/BBQ, and community area, with no reference to fire sprinklers or a fire suppression system. Since older buildings are sometimes retrofitted and agents may not always highlight sprinklers, their presence or absence cannot be confidently determined from the available data. Therefore, the fire-sprinkler status is left as unknown rather than assumed false.

I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', and 'life safety compliant' and found no references. Because there is no mention, the field is set to false with medium confidence (absence of evidence).

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

No listing view_descriptions include ocean-related terms, and 2 of 5 explicitly indicate no view (NONE). Public remarks repeatedly highlight being near the beach but never claim an ocean or water view, which would normally be a major selling point if present. This strongly suggests the building’s units do not offer true ocean views.

None of the listings describe mountain views in either the structured MLS view field or the public remarks. Given multiple independently written remarks and some listings explicitly marked with no view, it is very likely that units in this building do not offer notable mountain views.

Diamond Head views are typically highlighted in Waikiki marketing, but they are never mentioned in any of the five sets of remarks. Combined with the absence of a Diamond Head checkbox in MLS and some listings marked NONE, this indicates the building does not provide Diamond Head views.

Majority of MLS view_descriptions (4/6 listings) explicitly list CITY. Public remarks for the units do not reference views (no contradictions or mentions), and prior data indicated High confidence for city views. Because multiple current MLS listings expressly list 'CITY' view, the building is marked as offering city views.

While the building is close to the beach, agents repeatedly market proximity rather than any coastal or shoreline views. The absence of coastline view tags and the presence of NONE in some view fields strongly suggest that coastline views are not available from units in this building.

One listing explicitly tags GARDEN in the view field, indicating at least one unit looks onto landscaped or courtyard areas. Remarks across multiple listings mention a tropical community area to relax, consistent with garden/courtyard outlooks. This supports that some units in the building have garden views.

Golf course views are not referenced in any remarks or MLS view descriptions. Given the urban Waikiki context and explicit NONE views for some units, this strongly suggests that the building does not provide golf course views.

Listings focus on proximity to beach, zoo, parks, and Waikiki attractions but never mention Ala Wai Canal, harbor, or yacht marina views. With no marina-related view tags and some units marked as having no view, it is very unlikely that any units in this building offer marina or harbor views.

Neither the structured MLS data nor the narrative remarks mention sunrise viewing, morning sun, or similar orientation-based selling points. With several independent listings and some marked with no views, it is very likely that sunrise views are not a notable feature for this building’s units.

Sunsets and fireworks views are commonly highlighted when available in Waikiki listings but are completely absent here. Combined with the explicit NONE view entries and no sunset-related language, this indicates that units in this building do not have notable sunset views.

Cemetery views are neither indicated in MLS view fields nor discussed in any public remarks. Given multiple independent listings and some explicitly marked as having no view, it is highly likely that no units in this building overlook a cemetery.

The text mentions being near the beach, parks, zoo, aquarium, and Waikiki Shell, but does not say fireworks can be viewed from the property. Without explicit claims of a fireworks view, this feature is treated as not present.

No analysis available

None of the five remarks discuss whether pets are permitted, and agents do not market the building as pet-friendly. Because there is no explicit 'no pets' language either, the available data does not clarify the pet policy, so this is treated as unknown rather than confidently pet-friendly.

Multiple listings discuss how the units are managed (e.g., self-management versus continuing with the existing vacation rental company) but do not mention any on-site or live-in building manager. This lack of reference does not definitively prove there is no resident manager, as agents often omit it if not a selling point. Given the uncertainty, the existence of a resident manager is treated as unknown rather than conclusively false.

The building clearly supports legal short-term vacation rentals, but the language is about self-management or third-party rental companies, not a hotel program. The absence of any 'condotel' or hotel-operations terminology across all listings strongly indicates this is not a condotel.

Every listing calls the property 'fee simple', the standard for condominiums in Hawaii and not for co-ops. With no cooperative language or indicators present, the building can be treated with very high confidence as not being a co-op.