Bishop Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Bishop Gardens
Building Overview
Bishop Gardens in Kalihi-Palama — concrete construction from 1969, pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Bishop Gardens
Bishop Gardens is a residential building located in the Kalihi-Palama neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1969 and is built of concrete. The MLS data does not specify the number of units or total building size.
Key features from the MLS-derived data include concrete construction and building policies: pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. Information about on-site amenities (pool, gym, elevator, etc.) is not provided in the available MLS data.
Additional details such as parking, maintenance fees, management company (listed as Unknown), and other policies are not specified in the MLS records provided. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify details, fees, and rules with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or descriptive phrases and found none. Because there is no numeric or qualitative owner-occupancy information in the remarks and no prior numeric value provided, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any mention of elevators (e.g., 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'multiple elevators') and found none. Because no numeric or descriptive elevator information is present in the remarks and there is no prior numeric value provided, the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No agents' public remarks mention cable TV being included. While 4 of 8 current MLS listings have CABTV checked, evidence appears inconsistent across listings and may be due to copy/paste; therefore there is weak evidence the building reliably includes cable in the maintenance fee.
2 of 7 current MLS listings have 'OTCOEX' (common area electric) checked. There are no remarks in this listing explicitly stating common area electricity is included, so the feature is likely present in some units/building listings but not strongly corroborated by agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Explicit agent remark: 'Low maintenance fee that includes water and gas.' Additionally, 5 of 8 current MLS listings show GAS checked in association fee fields. Multiple sources (remarks + MLS) provide strong evidence that gas is included in the maintenance fee.
No listings' public remarks for this property mention hot water being included. With only 2 of 8 current MLS listings checking HOTWAT and no supporting remarks, there is weak evidence that hot water is included in the maintenance fee.
Public remarks do not reference internet or wifi being included. Only 1 of 8 current MLS listings has INTSER checked, so there's minimal evidence that internet service is included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No agent remarks in this listing mention sewer being included. While many MLS records (6 of 8) currently check SEWER, the absence of remarks here and potential for checkbox copy/paste mean the evidence is inconclusive and weak for building-wide sewer inclusion.
Explicit remark: 'Low maintenance fee that includes water and gas.' All 8 of 8 current MLS listings have WATER checked and prior confidence was High, providing very strong, consistent evidence that water is included in the maintenance fee.
No listing remarks mention BBQ, barbecue, grill, or grilling area across the supplied public remarks. The only evidence is a CURRENT MLS flag in 1 of 8 listings; given the lack of any descriptive confirmation in agent remarks, this appears to be an isolated checkbox entry rather than a documented building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data indicates community/shared laundry in 6 of 8 recent listings (historically high). None of the current listing remarks (0 of 7) mention 'community laundry', 'shared laundry', or 'laundry room'; several explicitly say 'washer and dryer inside the unit' or 'washing machine in unit', implying in-unit laundry. Evidence is conflicting—checkbox history supports community laundry but agent remarks point to in-unit laundry and possible copy/paste error, so confidence is low (0.40) until verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 listings include parking in parking_features and several agent remarks explicitly state '1 parking' or '1 assigned parking stall', providing strong, consistent evidence across multiple listings that the building has parking.
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: 7 of 8 current MLS entries include ASSIGN in parking_features and multiple public-remarks entries explicitly state '1 assigned parking' or '1 assigned parking stall'. Mentions appear across different listings/agents (e.g., '1 assigned parking in Bishop Gardens', '1 assigned parking stall'), indicating this is a genuine building-level feature rather than a single listing error.
No analysis available
Listings repeatedly mention an 'assigned' parking stall indicating a reserved spot, but there is no explicit language that the stall is deeded/owned with the unit. Without explicit 'deeded' wording, deeded parking cannot be confirmed from the remarks.
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or 'parking rental'. The remarks do not provide any monthly parking charge information, so the parking fee is unknown from these listings.
Moderate evidence that guest parking exists: 4 of 8 MLS listings include GUEST in parking_features, but 0 of the provided public-remarks entries mention 'guest' or 'visitor' parking. This suggests guest parking is possible but not confirmed in agent remarks and may reflect checkbox propagation/copy-paste rather than explicit marketing language.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking waitlist' / 'waiting list' language. None of the remarks referenced a waitlist; combined with assigned stalls mentioned, there is no evidence of a waitlist from these listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS inclusions list ACWIUN (window AC) on 6 of 8 current listings, indicating some units likely have window air conditioners. None of the provided public remarks explicitly mention window units, so the support is coming from agent-entered MLS fields (possibly copy/paste). Evidence is moderate—buyers should be aware some units appear to include window AC, but confirmation from unit-level photos or agent/owner verification is recommended.
All 8 current MLS listings for this building indicate 'CONCRE' in construction_materials; public remarks do not explicitly state 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete'. The unanimity of the MLS checkbox across multiple listings/agents yields strong evidence the building is concrete despite lack of explicit phrasing in the remarks.
No analysis available
Three of seven current MLS listings list hollow tile construction (HOLTIL). The supplied public remarks make no mention of hollow tile, so the evidence is limited to some MLS entries and could reflect agent checkbox usage or mixed building construction. Confidence is moderate because only a subset of listings indicate HOLTIL and no descriptive remarks confirm it.
Two of seven current MLS listings list masonry and stucco (MASSTU) construction. The public remarks provided contain no references to 'masonry' or 'stucco', so the support comes solely from a small number of MLS checkboxes and is therefore tentative. Confidence is low-moderate given the limited and inconsistent MLS coding and lack of corroborating remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for explicit short-term rental language (allowed or disallowed). The remarks contain no statements about STR policies, so short-term rentals are not indicated in the listings and are treated as not allowed for the purposes of this analysis.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or hotel management references. None were found. Because STR is not indicated as allowed, hotel-pool participation is false.
Searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or similar phrases. None of the listings mention a mandatory rental-pool requirement. As STR is not indicated, mandatory pool is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for leasehold/ground lease phrasing and a 4-digit expiry year (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'land lease to 2065'). No such language or year was present, so the lease expiry year is unknown from these remarks.
Searched remarks for phrases indicating VA loan approval (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing'). There are no references to VA financing in any of the listings, so VA approval is assumed not indicated in the remarks.
I looked for explicit claims that the HOA or building carries full/walls-in insurance and found no such language in the public remarks. Absent any mention or verification, the remarks do not support that the building is fully insured (false with medium confidence).
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE) or passed fire inspections and found none. With no mention and no user verification, the safest presumption from remarks alone is that this is not stated to be passed (returned as false with medium confidence).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/8) mention 'SUNSET' in view descriptions and two listings explicitly list VIEW = NONE. Public remarks reference generic/window or 'tree top view' but contain no phrases like 'sunset', 'western exposure', or 'evening sun'. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears to confirm the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks mention a resident or on-site manager (0/8 mention). The MLS checkbox is set in 3 of 8 current listings but there is no corroborating language such as 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or 'live-in manager' in any remarks, indicating likely copy/paste errors by agents. Given the lack of explicit remarks and absent prior confirmation, the feature is considered not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.