Azure Ala Moana

No analysis available

I searched for ownership-ratio clues such as a stated percentage, 'majority owner occupied,' or similar language. One remark says the unit is suitable for 'owner occupied or investment property,' but that does not provide a building-wide owner-occupancy rate, so it remains unknown.

I searched the listings for phrases such as '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' or 'multiple elevators,' but none were mentioned. Because the remarks do not provide a count, the number of elevators remains unknown from public text alone.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

No agent remarks indicate 'central AC included' while many listings explicitly state split/ductless or in‑unit AC. Only 1/20 MLS records show ACCEN in association_fee_includes, suggesting the single check is likely an entry error; evidence across listings points to fees not including central AC.

Cable inclusion is strongly supported across the listings. Several public remarks explicitly reference a bulk cable charge, which aligns with the MLS CABTV coding and looks like consistent building-level copy rather than a one-off agent note.

There is no meaningful public-remark support for common-area electricity being included. The dominant MLS pattern is OTCOEX, which suggests a different association fee item rather than common electric, so this feature should be treated as not included.

No analysis available

No public remarks indicate electricity is included in the association maintenance fee. One tenant-level note mentions rent "including electricity," and another listing notes electricity is added based on usage; MLS has only 1/20 with ELECTR checked, so evidence supports electricity is not included building-wide.

There are no public-remark references to gas being included in maintenance; MLS shows GAS checked in only 1/20 listings. Absence of supporting remarks across listings indicates gas is not included in the HOA fees.

Hot water does not appear to be a building-paid maintenance item here. The overwhelming WTRHTR pattern in unit inclusions, combined with the lack of remarks describing included hot water, supports a false value with high confidence.

Internet inclusion is supported by both MLS coding and remarks. The repeated references to high-speed Wi‑Fi and bulk internet charges suggest this is a real building-level amenity/fee item, even if not every listing records it the same way.

No analysis available

Sewer inclusion is very strongly supported by the MLS record set. With 18 of 20 listings showing SEWER and no contrary public remarks, this appears to be a stable building-level fee item.

Water inclusion is strongly supported across the listings. The MLS is highly consistent at 18 of 20, and the public remarks do not present any evidence of a change or correction.

BBQ/grilling facilities are confirmed across the entire MLS set. All 20 listings include BBQ in amenities, and the remarks repeatedly reference "BBQ pavilions," "BBQ cabanas," "4 grills," and "open grilling areas." This is very strong, consistent building-level evidence.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Little to no evidence: only 1 of 20 MLS entries lists car wash and no public remarks reference a car wash facility. Given the lack of corroborating remarks across listings, it's unlikely the building offers a car wash.

Strong/moderate evidence: while only a few MLS checkboxes historically marked clubhouse, numerous remarks repeatedly mention a 'club lounge' or 'club lounge w/ full kitchen' and 'club room', indicating a communal clubhouse/club lounge amenity available to residents.

Concierge service is well supported by several independent remarks, including phrases like "concierge services," "24-hour concierge," and "24-hour front desk service." Although only 5/20 current MLS entries have CONCIE checked, the repeated explicit mentions across listings confirm that this is a real building-level amenity rather than a checkbox error.

Dog park/pet area is very strongly supported. Roughly 18 of 20 listings include DGPRK, and many remarks explicitly say "dog park" or "puppy park." The consistency across numerous listings makes this a reliable building amenity.

Doorman/lobby-attendant style service appears to be offered, though often described as concierge or front desk rather than the word doorman itself. Across the remarks, several listings reference "24-hour front desk service," "24-hour concierge and reception services," and a lobby that welcomes guests, which is consistent with staffed lobby service at the building.

Exercise room/fitness center is very well supported across the listings. Roughly 18 of 20 current MLS records include EXEROO, and multiple remarks explicitly mention a "fitness center," "gym," or "exercise room," often with added detail like "outdoor workout area." The evidence appears consistent across many listings and agents, not just copy-paste from one source.

No analysis available

Meeting room/community-style room is supported by the remarks and MLS history. About 12 of 20 listings include MEEROO, and several descriptions mention a “meeting & entertaining room” or lounge with kitchen. This points to a legitimate shared space rather than a mistaken checkbox.

Strong evidence the building offers patio/deck-style outdoor space. Across the provided remarks, well over 20 listings mention a "lanai," "private lanai," "spacious lanai," or "balcony," often as part of the unit’s living area. This is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be a stable building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.

Weak/absent evidence for a jogging/walking path: while two MLS entries previously flagged WAJOPA, none of the public remarks in this dataset explicitly mention 'jogging path', 'walking path' or 'running trail'. Given the lack of confirmation in agent remarks, there's insufficient evidence to include a building jogging path.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

A recreation/amenity area appears to be present in the building. About 14 of 20 current listings include RECARE, and remarks reference “recreation areas,” lawn spaces, and shared amenity zones. The evidence is strong enough to treat this as a building feature.

Recreation room/party room is well supported. About 15 of 20 current listings include RECROO, and several remarks describe a "recreation room," "party room," "club lounge," or "meeting, entertainment, & lounge spaces." The feature appears to be a real common amenity rather than a one-off agent error.

The evidence does not support an on-site restaurant amenity for this building. Current remarks repeatedly mention proximity to restaurants, dining, and retail, but do not describe an actual in-building restaurant or dining facility; one remark even says restaurants may be opened later, which is not the same as an existing amenity. Given the low/medium historical support and lack of direct confirmation, this is best corrected to false.

No analysis available

There is no meaningful public-remark support for a sauna, and the feature is effectively absent from the listing descriptions. The few historical checkbox occurrences look like outliers, while the remarks consistently emphasize other amenities.

Storage is strongly confirmed at Azure Ala Moana. Across the provided remarks, it is mentioned well over 20 times in forms such as "storage locker," "private storage room," "walk in storage room," and "additional storage"—often with specifics like storage by the parking stall or a separate room on another level. The consistency across many different listings suggests this is a real building feature, not a copy-paste error.

This feature is directly and repeatedly confirmed in the public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly advertise surfboard storage, often alongside bicycle storage, so confidence is very high.

No analysis available

Trash chute is very well supported by the MLS history. Current data shows 19 of 20 listings include TRACHU, and the remarks explicitly mention "Trash Chute" in the amenity list. This is strong building-level evidence with minimal ambiguity.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Whirlpool/hot tub/spa is clearly supported. About 12 of 20 listings include WHIRLP, and remarks frequently mention "whirlpool spa," "hot tub," "jacuzzi," or "spa tub." The repeated phrasing across listings makes this a reliable shared amenity.

Azure Ala Moana clearly has a building pool. The current remarks mention it across dozens of listings, often in amenity lists such as "pool," "swimming pool," "heated pool," "large pool with hot tub," and "infinity-edge pool." This is strong, consistent, building-wide evidence across multiple agents and is reinforced by the prior high-confidence MLS amenity data.

There is strong evidence that Azure Ala Moana’s pool is heated. Current remarks explicitly reference “heated pool” and “heated pool, hot tub,” while historical MLS data also shows substantial HEAPOO usage, making this a consistent building amenity across listings.

I searched the remarks for explicit salt-pool wording such as "salt water pool" or "saltwater pool." The building has a pool, spa, and jacuzzi mentioned repeatedly, but none of the listings identify the pool as salt water.

In-unit laundry is strongly confirmed across Azure Ala Moana. Multiple current listings explicitly mention it, including "full size Electrolux washer/dryer," "full-sized, stacked washer/dryer in-unit," "side-by-side washer/dryer," and "washer and dryer in the unit." The evidence is consistent across many listings and agents, and it appears to be a stable building feature rather than a copy-paste error.

No substantive evidence of a building-level shared laundry: public remarks repeatedly describe in-unit laundry ('full-size', 'stacked', 'side-by-side', 'washer and dryer in unit') and do not mention a community laundry room. A small number of MLS amenity checkboxes list COMLAU, but remarks and unit descriptions overwhelmingly point to in-unit laundry, so a shared/coin laundry facility is not indicated.

I looked for public remarks indicating paid shared laundry, including coin laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, or a laundry fee. The remarks do not mention any paid community laundry setup, so this feature is not confirmed.

I searched the public remarks for explicit floor-by-floor community laundry phrases such as "laundry on each floor," "community laundry every floor," or similar wording. Nothing in the remarks confirms shared laundry facilities on every floor, and the laundry references are to in-unit appliances or a unit laundry room.

Strong evidence across listings that the building provides parking: 20/20 MLS records include parking features and virtually every public remark references parking stalls (examples: 'two side-by-side parking stalls', 'one (1) secured, assigned parking stall', 'covered parking stall'). Multiple agents independently mention parking, indicating this is a building-level feature rather than copy/paste error.

Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported at the building level. Multiple remarks across the listing set explicitly mention "assigned," "reserved," or "deeded" stalls, and the MLS history shows this on essentially every record. This looks consistent across many agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

Covered parking is clearly evidenced across the listing set. Numerous remarks explicitly mention "covered parking," garage parking, or covered side-by-side stalls, matching the strong MLS pattern. The evidence is consistent and broad across many listings.

The remarks directly mention deeded parking, which is the clearest possible evidence for this feature. I also saw multiple references to assigned, covered, reserved, and included stalls, which are consistent with ownership-style parking.

No analysis available

I looked for public remarks mentioning parking fee, monthly parking charge, additional parking cost, or parking rental, but found no such references. The listings mention parking stalls being included, but do not specify any separate parking fee.

Guest parking appears to be available at the building. Several remarks explicitly mention "lots of guest parking" or otherwise reference guest/visitor parking, and the MLS data shows guest parking on a substantial share of records. This is strong building-level evidence.

There is strong evidence that parking/building access is secured. Multiple remarks explicitly say "secured building," "24 hour secured building," and "secured entry," reinforcing the MLS pattern. The repeated language across listings suggests this is a real building feature, not just agent boilerplate.

Tandem parking is directly supported by multiple remarks, despite the current MLS data showing it on only 1/20 listings. The clearest evidence is the repeated phrase "two covered tandem parking stalls," which appears more than once and is too specific to dismiss as copy-paste error. This makes tandem parking a real building feature with high confidence.

No analysis available

I searched for language like parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a waitlist for parking and found nothing. The remarks describe parking stalls as included or assigned, with no indication that parking is waitlisted.

No analysis available

I looked for card/fob access language such as keycard entry, fob access, or electronic card readers. The remarks consistently mention secured entry, 24-hour security, concierge, and security guard, but they do not specifically confirm card-based access.

Security guard service is strongly supported across the listings and appears consistent, not a one-off agent copy-paste. Multiple independent remarks explicitly mention '24-hour security,' '24/7 security,' '24 hour secured building,' and 'security staff/on-site security,' confirming this is a building-level amenity buyers can expect.

I searched for any reference to patrol service or roving security staff. The public remarks describe a secured building with 24-hour security, security guard, concierge, and on-site staff, but no listing states that the building has a security patrol.

No analysis available

Evidence is mixed, but there is some support for central-air-style cooling in the building. Most remarks mention split AC or ducted split AC, while one listing explicitly states "central AC keeps you cool" and multiple others reference a ducted system with the look of central air. This suggests at least some units may have central/ducted HVAC, though the majority of remarks do not clearly confirm a building-wide central AC system.

Strong building-level evidence supports split AC at Azure Ala Moana. Across many current listings, multiple agents explicitly describe it in different ways—"split ACs in all rooms," "split AC throughout," "three split AC zones," and "ducted split AC system"—which aligns with the high-confidence MLS inclusion data. The consistency across many remarks suggests this is a real building feature, not just copy-paste checkbox noise.

No analysis available

Concrete construction is strongly supported. At least 1 listing explicitly says 'solid concrete construction,' and the overwhelming MLS history shows 19/20 listings marked CONCRE. The evidence appears consistent across many agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

No listing remarks reference double-wall construction, and none of the supplied descriptions provide building-level evidence for it. The feature appears to be an unchecked/unsupported MLS artifact rather than a confirmed characteristic of the building.

No analysis available

No analysis available

There is no remark-based support for steel frame construction anywhere in the listing history provided. Although 6/20 MLS records show STEFRA, the absence of any confirming remarks and the inconsistency across listings suggests this was likely copied or checked in error rather than a true building feature.

Strong evidence: although only 3 of 20 MLS records list SLAB, at least one public remark explicitly describes 'solid concrete construction' for the building and multiple listings reference the building as a newer concrete high-rise; combined with typical construction practices for similar Honolulu towers, this provides strong confirmation of concrete slab foundation/construction.

No analysis available

No analysis available

The evidence for above-ground construction is weak. Only 9 of 20 MLS records include ABOGRO, and the public remarks do not describe the building as above-ground-built or use comparable language, suggesting the checkbox may not reflect verified building construction.

No analysis available

No analysis available

The public remarks consistently reference a 30-day minimum rental policy. Per the feature definition, that means short-term rentals are not allowed in this building.

I looked for hotel rental pool language such as hotel-managed, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or participation in a rental program, but found none. The public remarks point instead to traditional condo rentals with a 30-day minimum, which is not a hotel pool arrangement.

I searched for wording like mandatory pool, required participation, must rent, or cannot opt out, and found no evidence of a mandatory rental pool. The remarks suggest ordinary condo use with rental flexibility, not a forced hotel-pool structure.

No analysis available

No analysis available

I searched the remarks for land-tenure language such as leasehold, ground lease, lease expires, lease renewal, and lease extension, but found nothing. No specific lease expiry year is stated anywhere in the public remarks, so this remains unknown.

I found an explicit reference to VA financing in the remarks. While the wording is about an assumable VA loan rather than a generic approval statement, it still strongly supports that VA financing is accepted for at least some units in the building.

Several listings explicitly say the building/maintenance includes full insurance coverage, including walls-in style wording such as 100% hurricane insurance. This is strong, repeated evidence that the HOA/building is fully insured.

Fire sprinklers appear to be a building-level feature at Azure Ala Moana based on the MLS record showing FIRSPR in 15 of 20 listings. The remarks across many listings focus on amenities and finishes rather than life-safety systems, so there is no reason to treat the checkbox as an error. This is consistent with a shared building feature rather than a unit-specific claim.

I looked for explicit fire/life safety compliance language, including FLSE-related phrasing and references to a passed fire inspection. The remarks only describe the building as secure and amenity-rich, so there is no public-remarks evidence to mark this as passed.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are consistently confirmed across the listing set and appear to be a core building feature. Dozens of remarks reference 'ocean views,' 'direct ocean view,' 'Pacific Ocean views,' and 'ocean and city views,' indicating broad confirmation across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste entry.

Mountain views are very strongly supported by the remarks. Many listings explicitly reference 'mountain views,' 'serene mountain vistas,' 'Koolau mountains,' and mountain views from bedrooms, lanais, and living areas. The consistency across many listings indicates the feature is genuine at the building level.

Diamond Head views are explicitly confirmed, though less universal than ocean or mountain views. Several listings mention “peek of Diamond Head,” “partial Diamond Head,” and “Diamond Head, ocean, harbor” views, showing this is a real building-level offering for some units. The MLS data supports this with 7/20 listings tagged DIAHEA and no NONE entries.

City views are one of the building’s most consistently documented features. Multiple listings mention 'city skyline,' 'city lights,' 'Downtown,' and 'urban Honolulu views,' and the near-universal MLS support suggests this is not an agent error.

Coastline views are clearly present in some units. Remarks mention "partial ocean and coastline views," "direct ocean views toward Magic Island," "Ala Moana Beach Park," and "harbor views," confirming that buyers can find coastline-facing units in this building. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings, though not universal.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Multiple listings mention harbor/canal/Ala Wai Harbor views (e.g., “Ala Wai Canal views,” “Ala Wai Harbor”), and some units cite harbor or Magic Island/harbor panoramas, indicating marina/harbor-view units exist in the building.

Sunrise views are supported by several listings that mention “sunrise,” “morning sun,” and east-facing exposures. The evidence is moderately strong rather than universal, suggesting only some units enjoy this feature. Because multiple remarks independently mention it, it should be included for buyers looking for sunrise views.

Sunset views are supported by multiple remarks, though not as universally as ocean or city views. Several listings specifically mention sunset enjoyment or west-facing/west-sunset exposures, which is strong enough to confirm the feature for the building.

No analysis available

I searched for explicit fireworks-view language such as "see fireworks from the lanai," "fireworks view," or similar phrases. The remarks discuss ocean, city, mountain, and sunset views, but do not say fireworks can be viewed from the units.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Resident-manager-style on-site staffing is supported by both the MLS data and the public remarks. Several listings mention "24/7 on-site residential specialists," "24-hour front desk service," and concierge/reception, which strongly suggests a staffed building presence. The evidence is repeated across many listings and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.

No analysis available

No analysis available