Anga-Roa
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Anga-Roa
Building Overview
Anga-Roa in Makiki-Tantalus (built 1973) is a 40-unit concrete building with mountain and Diamond Head views and an on-site pool.
About Anga-Roa
Based on MLS data, Anga-Roa is a 40-unit residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1973 and is of concrete construction, offering views of the surrounding mountains and Diamond Head.
Key features recorded in the MLS include an on-site pool and unit views of mountain and Diamond Head. Pets are permitted in the building. Short-term rentals are not allowed per the available MLS information.
Parking is available and reported as covered and assigned, with guest parking also provided. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify current details, rules, and any fees with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or descriptive phrases like "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." None of the public remarks provide a usable owner-occupancy figure. Since this is a numeric field and no percentage is stated, the value remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for an explicit elevator count such as "2 elevators," "4 elevators," or similar phrasing. The listings confirm elevator service exists in the building, but no remark gives a number. Because this is a numeric field and the count is not explicitly stated, the value remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is suggestive but not explicit: 8 of 14 current MLS listings include OTCOEX, which likely corresponds to a common-expense/electricity-related inclusion. Public remarks do not clearly say “common area electricity,” so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
This feature is very well supported. Current MLS data shows electricity included in 13 of 14 listings, and remarks repeatedly say things like “Maintenance Fee Includes Electricity” and “Electricity is included in the maintenance fees.”
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. One remark explicitly states “Maintenance Fee Includes Electricity, Hot Water, Sewer, Water,” which aligns with the current MLS pattern of 11 of 14 listings including HOTWAT and no WTRHTR exclusions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is highly consistent across the building. Current MLS data shows 13 of 14 listings include sewer, and remarks explicitly list sewer alongside other included utilities, indicating repeated cross-listing consistency.
Water inclusion is strongly supported and consistent across listings. Current MLS data shows 13 of 14 listings include water, and remarks repeatedly confirm “water” is part of the maintenance fee package.
There is no remark-level support for BBQ/grilling amenities across the provided listings. With only 3 of 14 MLS entries checking BBQ and no corroborating agent descriptions, the evidence leans toward a copy/paste or unchecked MLS inconsistency rather than a real shared feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are directly mentioned in the remarks, including "a car wash and dog park area" and "Car Wash Area." This aligns with the historically high confidence and suggests the amenity is a real building feature rather than a listing error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Dog park amenity is supported by several separate remark blocks, not just MLS checkboxes. At least 4 listings explicitly mention it with phrases such as "your very own dog park," "even a Dog Park!," and "Amenities include a dog park & pool," which is strong cross-listing confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly reference outdoor space: several ads note an "enclosed lanai" or "fully enclosed permitted lanai," and multiple other remarks call out the "pool deck and party area" or "updated pool and recreation area." At least 6 listings mention lanai/pool-deck style outdoor amenities across different agent remarks, indicating the building offers patios/decks (both unit lanais and shared pool deck) rather than being a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several remarks directly list surfboard storage as an amenity, sometimes alongside bike storage. This is clear, repeated evidence that dedicated surfboard storage is available.
No analysis available
Trash chute is clearly supported by the remarks, with one listing stating "Trash chute on each floor." That explicit building-level description matches the prior high-confidence data and strongly confirms the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across the listings confirms Anga-Roa has a shared swimming pool. At least 8-10 remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases like "refreshing swimming pool," "updated pool and recreation area," and "pool, recreation area." The consistency across multiple agents suggests this is a real shared amenity rather than a copy-paste checkbox error.
No analysis available
I searched for 'salt water pool,' 'saltwater pool,' 'salt pool,' and 'saline pool.' The building has a pool, but the remarks do not specify that it is salt water.
Strong, consistent evidence that Anga-Roa offers in-unit laundry. At least 7 separate listing remarks explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit or in-unit laundry, including phrases like 'washer and dryer in the unit,' 'in-unit washer and dryer,' and 'newer full-size washer/dryer.' The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and listings, not just copy-paste checkbox data.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as 'coin laundry,' 'coin-op,' 'paid laundry,' 'card operated,' and 'quarters.' The remarks do not mention any shared laundry at all, and instead describe washer/dryer in the unit.
I searched for remarks like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' and similar floor-by-floor laundry references. The public remarks consistently point to in-unit laundry rather than shared laundry facilities, so there is no evidence for this amenity.
No analysis available
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly confirmed across the building. Multiple listings and remarks explicitly reference assigned parking, including 'one assigned parking stall' and '2 covered, assigned, full-sized, side-by-side parking stalls,' which is consistent with the high-confidence MLS pattern. This appears to be a real building feature, not a copy-paste anomaly.
Covered parking is clearly supported by both MLS data and remarks. At least several listings mention covered stalls, garage access, or secured covered parking, including specific details like 'lower garage' and 'two covered parking stalls.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings.
The listings repeatedly mention 'assigned parking stall,' 'covered parking stalls,' and 'secured covered parking,' but do not say the parking is deeded or owned with the unit. Based on the public remarks, deeded parking is not established.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking charges, rental fees, or any additional parking cost and found nothing. The remarks discuss included/assigned parking but do not list a separate parking fee.
Guest parking is well-supported and repeatedly advertised. Current remarks explicitly state 'two guest parking stalls' and 'guest parking,' matching the high-confidence MLS trend. This feature appears in multiple listings and is likely a genuine building amenity.
Secured parking/entry is well-documented (MLS: 10/13 SECENT) and reinforced in remarks with phrases like 'gated with fob entrance', 'secured entry', and 'security gate on Poki Street', showing strong, multi-agent confirmation of gated/secured access.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist or waiting-list language. The remarks only indicate assigned, covered, or guest parking and do not mention any waitlist system.
No analysis available
Multiple remarks explicitly describe the building as gated with fob entrance, secured entry, and security-gated parking access. That is strong evidence of a card/fob access security system.
No analysis available
I searched for 'security patrol,' 'roving security,' 'patrol service,' and similar wording. The listings mention secured entry and cameras/gates, but nothing about an actual patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is very likely concrete. MLS records consistently identify it as CONCRE across 13 of 14 current listings, which aligns with the prior high-confidence history. No public remarks suggest any change, so this appears to be a stable building-level characteristic rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is not enough evidence to treat above-ground construction as a building feature. Only 1 of 14 listings includes ABOGRO, and the remarks across the sample are silent on this point, suggesting likely MLS inconsistency or copy-paste error. Because the feature is not corroborated by remarks or broader listing history, it should be treated as false for now.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators such as 'short-term rental allowed,' 'vacation rental,' 'NUC,' or 'TVU,' and found none. The remarks read like standard residential condo listings with no evidence that short-term rentals are permitted.
I looked for hotel pool or hotel-managed rental program references such as Hilton pool, Ritz pool, or 'hotel rental program.' None appear in the remarks, so there is no evidence of a hotel rental pool.
I searched for wording like 'mandatory hotel pool,' 'must participate,' or 'cannot opt out' and found none. With no evidence of STR eligibility or a rental pool program, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for ground lease, leasehold, or expiration language like 'lease expires YEAR' or 'land lease to YEAR.' The remarks only describe the condo and amenities, with no land tenure details.
I searched the remarks for explicit VA language such as 'VA approved,' 'VA financing,' or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. Nothing in the listings suggests VA loan eligibility.
I searched for phrases indicating walls-in or comprehensive HOA coverage such as fully insured, full insurance, and fully covered insurance. The remarks explicitly state "full hurricane insurance coverage," which is strong evidence of full building insurance coverage. This is the clearest insurance-related evidence in the listings.
No listings' public remarks mention a fire sprinkler or sprinkler system (0/13 mentions). Several listings explicitly note a fire alarm system, but there are no phrases like 'fire sprinkler' or 'sprinkler system'. CURRENT MLS has 1/13 checked for FIRSPR, which appears to be an isolated agent checkbox rather than corroborated by agent remarks.
I looked for terms like FLSE, fire life safety evaluation passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. The remarks only reference a fire alarm system, which is not the same as a passed safety evaluation. With no evidence of a pass, this is treated as not confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views appear in a minority of current MLS view descriptions (3 of 14), so this is supported but not strongly confirmed by remarks. The listing remarks emphasize city, Diamond Head, mountain, and Tantalus views instead, suggesting ocean-facing units may exist but are not consistently advertised.
Multiple listings explicitly reference mountain views — e.g., "lush Ko'olau mountains," "Diamond Head and Tantalus views," and "cool breeze from Mt. Tantalus." These mountain-view phrases appear in at least 6 of the provided remarks, coming from different listing entries rather than a single copy/paste, so there is consistent evidence that some units have mountain views.
Diamond Head views are strongly supported across multiple listings and agents, with 6/14 current MLS view descriptions including DIAHEA and several remarks naming Diamond Head directly. The repeated phrasing suggests this is a real building-level view option rather than a copy-paste artifact.
City views are extremely well supported and appear in nearly all current MLS records (13 of 14). Remarks from multiple listings consistently describe Honolulu city skyline, city views, and city skyline combined with Diamond Head, indicating a reliable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'fireworks view,' 'watch fireworks from lanai,' and 'see fireworks from unit.' The listings mention city, Diamond Head, mountain, and skyline views, but nothing indicates a direct fireworks view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 13 public remarks reviewed mention a resident manager, on-site manager, or live-in manager. Although 4/14 current MLS records show RESMAN in amenities, the absence of any supporting remarks suggests this is likely an unverified checkbox rather than a real building feature. The evidence pattern looks weak and inconsistent, so the feature should not be treated as confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.