Anaha - 1108 Auahi

No analysis available

I searched for explicit owner-occupancy data such as percentages ('80% owner occupied') or descriptive phrases like 'highly owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied.' The remarks mention second-home owners and one tenant-occupied unit, but that is not enough to estimate a building-wide owner-occupancy percentage.

I searched the public remarks for direct elevator references such as a count ('4 elevators', 'four elevators') or vague indicators like 'multiple elevators.' The only related phrase was 'no elevator' easy access for a podium unit, which refers to unit access convenience rather than the building's elevator count, so the number remains unconfirmed.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Although only a few MLS checkbox entries list central AC (3/20), public remarks explicitly cite "central AC" (e.g., "central AC, gas cooking...and comprehensive maintenance coverage..."). This explicit mention across remarks supports including central AC as an included fee.

High-confidence evidence: 18 of 20 current MLS listings mark CABTV and multiple agent remarks explicitly state “comprehensive maintenance coverage—including cable TV.” The phrase appears across listings from different agents (not limited to a single ad), indicating the building maintenance fee includes cable TV.

MLS checkbox data shows 13 of 20 listings marking OTCOEX (common area electricity) as included, but public remarks do not explicitly reference "common area electricity." The feature is therefore included based on consistent MLS checkbox usage, though agent remarks are not explicit.

No analysis available

No listings or remarks state that unit electricity is included in association fees (MLS shows 0/20 with ELECTR). With no supporting remarks and absent MLS checkbox data, there is strong evidence electricity is not included.

Strong evidence: 15 of 20 listings list GAS in association fee includes and agent remarks explicitly list gas as covered (e.g., “comprehensive maintenance coverage—including gas”). Multiple listings and agents confirm the inclusion.

Consistent evidence: 14 of 20 MLS entries list HOTWAT and agent remarks explicitly state “comprehensive maintenance coverage—including hot water.” Multiple listings from different agents confirm hot water is included in the association fees.

Strong confirmation: 16 of 20 listings mark internet included and several public remarks explicitly mention internet/wifi as part of association-covered utilities, indicating building maintenance fees include internet service.

No analysis available

Very strong evidence: 19 of 20 MLS listings mark sewer included and agent remarks repeatedly state sewer is covered (“comprehensive maintenance coverage—including … sewer”), showing near-universal confirmation across listings.

Strong evidence: 18 of 20 listings indicate water is included and many public remarks explicitly state “comprehensive maintenance coverage—including water,” demonstrating consistent confirmation that water is covered by association fees.

BBQ facilities are well confirmed at the building level. Multiple listings explicitly reference BBQ amenities in different forms, such as "BBQ cabanas," "BBQ areas," and "barbecue cabanas," consistent with the near-universal MLS history. The repeated wording across listings supports a real shared amenity, not just agent copy-paste noise.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Car wash facilities appear to be a real amenity of the building. Several remarks explicitly list "car wash," which supports the moderate historical MLS evidence. The feature is not universal in the remarks, but there is enough direct confirmation to include it.

No analysis available

Concierge service is very strongly supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Several listings explicitly state "concierge service," "concierge desk," "24-hour concierge staff," and "front desk/concierge," showing consistent building-level service across multiple agents. The evidence is broad and repeated, so this remains a high-confidence feature.

Dog park/pet area is strongly evidenced. Multiple listings explicitly say “dog park” or “dog run,” and the MLS history also shows strong support (16/20).

While MLS checkbox for DOORMA is not set historically, multiple listings (numerous agent remarks) describe concierge or front-desk/lobby staffing—phrases include 'concierge', 'concierge desk', and 'front desk/concierge greets you daily'—which implies a staffed lobby/attendant/doorman service. Evidence is implied across many listings but not always described with the explicit word 'doorman', so confidence is moderate.

Exercise room/fitness center is clearly a building amenity. The remarks consistently mention it across many listings, including phrases like "state-of-the-art fitness center," "gym," and "fitness center," matching the very strong MLS history. This does not look like a copy-paste error because the amenity appears in many independent descriptions.

No analysis available

Meeting/conference space is strongly supported. Listings repeatedly describe a "conference room," "meeting room," or community/private dining spaces that function as shared gathering rooms, aligning with the MLS amenity data. The repeated mentions across different agents suggest a real amenity rather than a checkbox artifact.

Strong, repeated evidence across many listings supports patio/deck amenities for Anaha. At least several remarks explicitly mention a 'private lanai' and other outdoor deck-style spaces, while the MLS amenity history shows 16/20 listings checking PATDEC/COVPAT. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

Confidence 90%: Only 7 of 20 MLS listings check WAJOPA, yet dozens of detailed amenity lists never mention a jogging/walking path despite enumerating many smaller amenities, suggesting those MLS checks are copy/paste errors.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Clear confirmation: multiple listings explicitly mention a putting green or mini-putt as part of the amenity package (e.g., 'golf putting green', 'putting green'), consistent with historical MLS data.

The building clearly offers shared recreation areas. Current remarks repeatedly refer to the amenity/recreation deck and other communal entertainment spaces, matching the strong MLS history. This is a consistent building-wide feature across many listings.

There is solid evidence for a recreation/party room type amenity. While the exact wording varies, multiple remarks reference "community room," "party rooms," "meeting/party room," and similar shared gathering spaces, which fit the recreation_room definition. The evidence is moderate-to-strong and appears repeatedly across listings.

Restaurant access is supported, though less universally than the core amenities. Several remarks note "restaurants on the ground floor," "excellent selection of restaurants on the grounds," or dining in the podium/building, which is enough to confirm a building-related restaurant amenity. The evidence is consistent, but not as ubiquitous as fitness or tennis.

No analysis available

Sauna facilities are very well confirmed. Many listings explicitly reference "sauna," "steam room," or "steam & dry sauna," which strongly matches the MLS history. This is a clear shared amenity at the building level.

Storage is clearly available at Anaha across many listings. Current remarks mention it in numerous forms—"private storage room," "storage locker," "additional storage locker," "2 storage lockers," "2 storage rooms," and "storage room for sale"—showing consistent evidence from multiple agents and unit types. The evidence is strong and specific, not just an MLS checkbox artifact.

The remarks directly list surfboard storage as an amenity, which is strong public evidence. This is a clear affirmative match for the feature.

Tennis court access is very well supported. The remarks across many listings explicitly state "tennis court" or "tennis/pickleball court," which aligns with the strong historical MLS record. This is a clear building-level amenity rather than a one-off unit feature.

Trash chute is highly likely to be a building feature based on the MLS record. Remarks do not often call it out, but the checkbox history is overwhelmingly positive, which is enough under the provided rules. There is no strong evidence of a correction or removal.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Whirlpool/hot tub amenities are clearly present. Listings refer to “whirlpool,” “hot tub,” and “jacuzzi,” and the MLS history is strongly supportive (17/20).

Pool is clearly a building-level amenity. The current remarks mention it across dozens of listings, often with specific descriptions like 'glass bottom pool,' 'cantilevered pool,' 'lap pool,' and 'infinity pool,' showing strong multi-agent consistency rather than a one-off copy/paste error.

The evidence supports a heated swimming pool as a shared building amenity. While the heated flag is not universal in MLS fields, multiple current remarks explicitly say 'heated pool' or 'heated infinity pool,' which strongly confirms the feature across listings.

I searched for terms like 'salt water pool,' 'saltwater pool,' and 'saline pool' but found none. The pool is described in many other ways—glass-bottom, infinity, cantilevered, heated, ocean-view—but not as salt water.

This feature is very strongly supported across the listing set. At least 15+ remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry, including phrases such as "full size stacked washer/dryer," "washer / dryer in unit," and "full sized washer and dryer in dedicated laundry room," which indicates it is not just an MLS checkbox artifact. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so laundry_in_unit should be treated as present.

No analysis available

I looked for references to coin laundry, paid laundry, coin-op machines, card-operated laundry, or laundry fees and found nothing. The remarks focus on in-unit washer/dryer setups and do not indicate a paid shared laundry facility.

I searched the public remarks for language like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' and similar phrasing, but found none. The listings instead mention in-unit laundry or a dedicated laundry room, which does not confirm community laundry on every floor.

No analysis available

Very strong building-level evidence that parking is assigned/reserved. Across the remarks, many listings explicitly reference 'assigned parking stall,' 'deeded storage lockers adjacent to the assigned parking stall,' 'reserved parking,' and multiple units with specific numbered stalls, which is consistent across numerous agents and not just copy-paste checkbox data.

Extremely strong evidence that the building offers covered parking. Multiple remarks explicitly say 'covered parking stall,' 'covered side by side parking,' 'enclosed garage parking stall,' and 'attached private garage,' with many stalls noted on garage or podium levels, confirming covered parking throughout the building.

I searched for explicit wording like "deeded parking," "owned stall," and "parking included in deed," but did not find it. The listings consistently mention parking stalls, garages, and EV chargers, which suggests assigned parking but not deeded ownership.

No analysis available

I looked for any parking cost language such as "parking fee," "monthly parking charge," or "parking rental," and found nothing. The remarks describe the parking configuration but do not mention any separate parking expense.

Moderate-to-strong evidence (~13 listings) that guest parking is available: comments such as 'guest parking for your friends and family' and multiple listings referencing guest parking/guest suites support inclusion. Historical MLS data also previously indicated guest parking regularly.

Evidence across many listings (~11) indicates secured access/security for parking: phrases include '24-hour security and concierge', 'secured building', and 'secure covered parking stalls'. Combined with historical MLS entries for secured entry, this supports marking the building as having secured parking entry.

No analysis available

No analysis available

I searched for phrases like "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," and "join waitlist for parking," but found no references. The listings instead emphasize that parking stalls are included or conveniently located, with no indication of a waitlist process.

No analysis available

I looked for public remarks mentioning card/fob access, keycard entry, or card-reader systems and found nothing. The building is described as having 24-hour security, concierge, and being secured, but that is not the same as explicit card access.

Security guard service is strongly supported across the building. Multiple recent listings explicitly mention "24 hour security," "24/7 security," or describe Anaha as a "secured" and "very secured" luxury building, which is consistent across several agents rather than a one-off copy-paste. The current MLS pattern (17/20) and public remarks both support this feature with very high confidence.

I searched for patrol-related language such as 'security patrol,' 'roving security,' or 'patrolled building' and found no explicit mentions. The remarks consistently refer to security staff, guards, concierge, and 24-hour security instead.

No analysis available

Central AC is strongly supported for Anaha. Historical MLS data shows 16/20 unit-feature listings and 18/20 inclusions matching ACCEN/CENAC, and the current remarks include an explicit 'central AC' mention plus several references to air-conditioned storage areas. The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to be repeated reliably rather than a one-off agent error.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Concrete construction appears to be a stable building-level attribute: 19 of 20 MLS listings include CONCRE. The public remarks repeatedly describe the same Anaha tower without contradicting this, and there is no sign of an agent copy-paste correction that would weaken the MLS pattern.

Double-wall construction appears in 9 of 20 MLS listings, enough to indicate the feature may exist at the building level. The public remarks do not mention 'double wall' or related phrasing, so this is supported mainly by MLS history and should be treated as moderate-confidence evidence.

Confidence 95%: Only 1 of 20 MLS listings lists HOLTIL, and hollow tile is not a realistic primary structural system for a modern ultra-luxury high-rise of this scale.

No analysis available

Steel-frame construction is present in 11 of 20 MLS records, suggesting it may be part of the building’s recorded construction materials. Public remarks consistently describe the same building and amenities but do not explicitly confirm steel framing, so confidence remains moderate.

Confidence 72%: 4/20 MLS entries include SLAB in construction_materials, and a high-rise of this type is almost certainly built on a concrete slab foundation.

No analysis available

No analysis available

5 of 20 MLS listings include ABOGRO, but the hundreds of lines of public remarks contain almost no references to 'above ground' construction or related phrasing. Given the limited MLS mentions and lack of confirming remarks across multiple agents, this feature is only weakly supported and is reported with low/moderate confidence.

No analysis available

No analysis available

I searched for STR-related terms such as "short-term rental allowed," "vacation rental," "NUC," and "TVU," but found none. The remarks do not provide evidence that short-term rentals are permitted in this building.

I looked for hotel pool references like "hotel rental pool," "managed by hotel," or brand-specific rental programs, and found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must remain false.

I searched for wording such as "mandatory pool," "required to participate," or "cannot opt out," but found nothing. There is also no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.

No analysis available

No analysis available

I looked for leasehold references such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," "leasehold," and specific expiration years, but nothing was mentioned. The remarks do not indicate that this is a leasehold property or provide any lease expiry date.

I searched the public remarks for phrases like "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted," but found none. With no explicit financing language in the listings, there is no evidence to support VA approval.

Multiple remarks indicate the building is fully insured by the HOA, including the direct phrase '100% insured.' This is strong explicit evidence for walls-in/full building insurance coverage.

Fire sprinklers appear to be a building-level feature for Anaha. Current MLS data shows FIRSPR in 16 of 20 listings, which is strong and consistent across recent listings, even though public remarks do not explicitly mention sprinklers. The pattern looks like repeated MLS verification rather than isolated copy-paste noise.

I looked for public-remarks language indicating a fire/life safety evaluation pass, fire safety certification, or fire inspection clearance. Nothing in the listings references FLSE or any similar compliance status, so there is no evidence to mark this true.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are consistently confirmed across the listings, with far more than just a few isolated mentions. Remarks repeatedly describe "panoramic ocean and city skyline views," "stunning ocean views," and "views of the Pacific Ocean," which indicates this is a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.

Multiple listing remarks explicitly reference mountain/Ko'olau views (e.g., "Ko'olau Mountains," "mountain views," "cool mountain breezes"). These mentions occur across numerous unit listings and floorplans, showing the building provides mountain-view units and not an isolated attribute of a single unit.

Clear evidence in the public remarks: many listings explicitly note "Diamond Head" or "Diamond Head Crater" views (e.g., "Diamond Head corner unit," "views of Diamond Head & Waikiki"). These recurring references from multiple listings and agents indicate the building offers units with Diamond Head views.

City views are very well supported by both the MLS pattern and the remarks. Multiple listings describe "city skyline," "Honolulu City Skyline," and combined ocean/city/mountain views, making this a highly reliable feature for the building.

Coastline views are directly stated in multiple remarks, most clearly in "views of Diamond Head, ocean, coastline & sunset views." While mentioned less often than ocean or city, the feature appears genuine and repeatedly associated with the same corner/stack descriptions.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Several listing remarks call out harbor/marina views (e.g., “Kewalo Boat Harbor,” “Kewalo Harbor,” “yacht harbor,” “nearby Marina & Sunsets”), including high-floor and corner units. Multiple agents reference harbor/marina vistas, supporting inclusion of marina view availability in the building.

No analysis available

Sunset views are confirmed in several remarks, including phrases like "Nearby Marina & Sunsets!", "enjoy gorgeous sunsets," and "sunset views." While less frequent than ocean or city views, the repeated direct mentions across multiple listings make this a credible building feature.

No analysis available

This feature is directly stated in the remarks with a clear from-unit view of Friday night fireworks. The evidence is strong and unambiguous, so this is a high-confidence true.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Resident manager appears to be a building-level amenity for Anaha. Current MLS data shows RESMAN in 17 of 20 listings, a very strong consistency pattern across listings. Public remarks do not directly mention a resident manager, but the repeated MLS checkbox evidence supports including it.

No analysis available

No analysis available