Alii Inc

All available MLS property records for this building indicate a construction year of 1959. No remarks suggest a different build date or a full rebuild that would alter this year.

Remarks from both listings state the building is a '4-story walk-up'. This matches the observed unit floors (2nd and 3rd floors), so the building is taken to have 4 total floors.

No remarks mention how many units are in the building, and no reliable MLS unit-count data is available. The total number of units cannot be determined from the current information.

The remarks discuss rental rules (residential use only, no vacation rental, minimum 90 days) but do not state how many units are owner-occupied. Without explicit figures or qualitative owner-occupancy descriptions, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.

The building is explicitly described as a 4-story walk-up, implying access is by stairs only. This strongly indicates there are no elevators in the building.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Remarks specify 'Window AC in the bedroom' and do not reference any central air system or AC included in monthly fees. With MLS showing no ACCEN flags, it is very likely that central AC is not provided or included in the maintenance fees.

One of the two listings explicitly says 'Monthly fee include water/sewer, cable and co-op property tax.' Current MLS data also shows CABTV selected in 1 of 2 listings. This direct mention plus matching MLS data strongly supports that cable TV is included in the maintenance fees.

As a 4-story co-op walk-up, building operations (hallway and exterior lighting, any shared power) are effectively funded through the monthly co-op maintenance. One of two MLS records also flags OTCOEX for common area electricity. While not called out in remarks, the building type and MLS checkbox make it very likely that common area electricity is included.

The remarks clearly state 'Monthly fee include ... co-op property tax.' This is reinforced by COOTAX being checked in one of two MLS entries. Together these show that cooperative property taxes are included in the monthly maintenance fee.

The only detailed fee description lists water, sewer, cable, and co-op taxes as included, omitting electricity. Given that electricity inclusion is a major selling point and MLS does not mark ELECTR, it is very likely that unit electricity is not included in the maintenance fees.

The fee breakdown explicitly names water, sewer, cable, and co-op tax but does not mention gas. With no MLS indication of GAS being included, it is highly likely that gas is not part of the included maintenance utilities.

If hot water were a separately highlighted inclusion, it would typically appear alongside water/sewer in the remarks, but it does not. Combined with 0/2 MLS entries for HOTWAT and no mention of central hot water systems, this strongly suggests hot water is not explicitly included in the maintenance fees.

The remarks specify that fees include water, sewer, cable, and co-op tax but do not mention internet or Wi-Fi. Given that internet inclusion is a common marketing point and only one MLS entry checked INTSER inconsistently, internet service is very likely not included in the maintenance fees.

The building is described in detail as a Waikiki walk-up near the beach with no reference to docks, slips, or marina access. With MLS data also showing no MARINA code, there is extremely strong evidence that marina fees are not part of the maintenance charges.

The remarks clearly state that sewer is included in the monthly fee as part of 'water/sewer.' This is confirmed by SEWER being marked in 2 of 2 MLS entries, giving very strong support that sewer charges are covered by the maintenance fees.

The fee description explicitly includes water as part of 'water/sewer.' With WATER selected in 2 out of 2 MLS entries and no conflicting information, it is clear that water is included in the building's maintenance fees.

Public remarks highlight beach access, lanai, and outdoor shower but do not mention any barbecue or grill areas. With MLS showing 0/2 for BBQ, it is very likely the building has no shared BBQ facilities.

In 2 listings reviewed, agents describe multiple building features but never mention bicycle storage or a bike room, and the MLS bike storage amenity box is not selected in either case. This consistent absence across listings strongly indicates that the building does not provide dedicated bike storage facilities.

Remarks talk about being one block from Waikiki Beach but do not mention any boat slips, docks, or marina access. Given the urban, non-marina context and 0/2 MLS checks for MARINA, the building does not have a boat dock.

Parking is discussed only in terms of assigned stalls and a waiting list, with nothing about washing facilities. The absence of any mention and unchecked CRWSH in MLS suggests there is no car wash amenity.

The property is characterized as a 4-story walk-up with 'golden days charm' and basic services, but no shared clubhouse. With 0/2 MLS listings indicating CLUHOU and no textual support, a clubhouse is very unlikely.

The building is presented as a simple co-op walk-up near the beach with no mention of front desk or concierge services. In Waikiki, concierge offerings are typically marketed explicitly, but both agents omit any such claim and MLS data supports that absence. This provides strong evidence that there is no concierge service in the building.

The listings do not highlight any pet-specific common areas and instead emphasize beach proximity and basic building features. Given the complete absence of references and unchecked DGPRK in MLS, a dog park is almost certainly not present.

Both sets of remarks emphasize 'golden days charm,' walk-up access, and basic conveniences, but do not reference any staffed entry or doorman services. For Waikiki buildings that have doormen, this is usually highlighted, and here it is absent across 2 listings and in the amenities data. This strongly indicates there is no doorman or equivalent lobby attendant.

Both remarks focus on proximity to Waikiki Beach, on-site laundry, and an outdoor shower but never reference a gym, fitness center, or exercise room. Combined with 0/2 MLS amenities indicating EXEROO, this strongly suggests the building does not offer an exercise room.

This is presented as a charming, modest co-op rather than a luxury high-rise, and no transportation services are advertised. With 0/2 MLS listings showing LIMSER, it is almost certain that limo or building car service is not provided.

Remarks mention co-op management approval but not any physical meeting space or community room. The absence in descriptions and MLS amenities implies there is no dedicated meeting room.

2/2 listings describe a lanai, e.g., "Relax on your private lanai" and "a lanai for fresh air & people watching." This strongly indicates the building offers patio/deck-style outdoor spaces for its units. Given consistent wording across different agents, this is treated as a confirmed building feature.

While the area is walkable and close to Waikiki attractions, there is no indication of a dedicated jogging or walking path as a building amenity. MLS also does not mark WAJOPA, so this feature is not offered as part of the property.

Descriptions focus on adult-oriented vacation-style living near Waikiki Beach, with no mention of kids’ play structures or tot lots. MLS also shows 0/2 for PLYGRND, supporting that there is no playground.

0/2 listings reference any yard or enclosed ground-level outdoor space; only lanais are mentioned. The building is described as a 4-story walk-up in dense Waikiki, where private yards for units would be atypical. This is treated as strong evidence that private yard space is not a building feature.

Amenities described are limited to on-site laundry and an outdoor shower; golf-related features are absent. The lack of mention plus 0/2 MLS checks for PUTGRE indicates there is no putting green.

The only common-area feature described is an outdoor shower for rinsing off sand. Since no listing mentions an amenity deck or recreation area and MLS does not mark RECARE, the building likely lacks a formal recreation area.

Remarks focus on unit features (lanai, cross-breezes) and basic building items (on-site laundry, outdoor shower) but omit any recreation or game room. Together with MLS entries not checking RECROO, this supports that no recreation room exists.

The remarks emphasize that restaurants and nightlife are close by along Kalakaua and Kuhio Avenues, implying dining is off-site. With no reference to on-site dining and 0/2 MLS checks for RESTAU, the building does not contain a restaurant.

All outdoor enjoyment described is via the unit lanai and quick beach access; no roof terrace or rooftop amenities are cited. With 0/2 MLS entries marking ROOFDCK, it is very likely the building lacks shared rooftop amenities.

No wellness or spa facilities are advertised beyond proximity to the beach. With no textual support and SAUNA unchecked in all MLS entries, a sauna is very unlikely to be present.

Across 2 recent listings for this co-op, no agent remarks reference storage units, storage lockers, or extra storage, and the MLS amenities fields for storage are consistently left unchecked. Given the small walk-up nature of the building and the lack of any mention where space is at a premium, it is very likely that the building does not offer dedicated storage units.

Public remarks reference an outdoor shower for rinsing off sand and an on-site laundry area, but do not mention any dedicated surfboard or board storage facilities. Searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found no evidence, so this feature is assumed not present.

The building is portrayed as a modest low-rise co-op near the beach, without reference to recreational courts. The absence of any mention across all remarks and 0/2 MLS amenities for TENCOU indicates there is no tennis court.

Descriptions of building features cover on-site laundry, outdoor shower, and parking but do not reference a trash chute system. With 0/2 MLS entries marking TRACHU, it is likely the building does not offer a trash chute.

0/2 listings mention valet or valet parking; instead they note "Parking stalls belong to this coop building and have a waiting list for parking" and an assigned stall. The small 4-story walk-up profile is inconsistent with valet service, so valet is considered not offered.

Across 2 listings, agents highlight the outdoor shower, proximity to Waikiki Beach, and parking, but never describe the property as gated, walled, or fenced. MLS amenity fields for gated or walled fencing are also consistently left blank. This strongly suggests the property does not have a notable perimeter wall or gated/fenced compound as a building feature.

The only water-related amenity mentioned is the Pacific Ocean and an outdoor shower for rinsing off sand. MLS amenities do not indicate WHIRLP, so the building appears not to have a whirlpool or hot tub.

Across 2 listings for this co-op, none have pool amenities checked in MLS and neither public remark mentions any kind of pool. The descriptions focus on proximity to Waikiki Beach, an outdoor shower, and on-site laundry in a 4-story walk-up, which suggests the building does not offer a pool.

No listings (0/2) indicate a pool or heated pool in amenities or remarks, and the building is described only with features like an outdoor shower and on-site laundry. Since there is no sign of a pool, it is effectively certain there is no heated pool.

The remarks reference proximity to Waikiki Beach and an outdoor shower but do not mention any swimming pool, let alone a saltwater or saline pool. I specifically searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', and 'salt pool' and found no matches, so there is no evidence that a saltwater pool is present.

Neither of the 2 current listings advertises an in-unit washer/dryer, and the remarks instead focus on shared facilities. In a 4-story walk-up co-op where agents highlight the ground-floor laundry, it is very likely that units generally do not have in-unit laundry. Buyers specifically needing in-unit laundry should not expect this feature in this building.

2/2 listings include community laundry in the MLS amenities, and one remarks: 'There is on site laundry on the ground floor.' Evidence across multiple units and agents consistently confirms shared laundry facilities in the building.

The description confirms the presence of on-site laundry but provides no details about payment methods or costs. Searched for terms like coin-op, card-operated, quarters, or laundry fee and found none. In the absence of explicit evidence, this is assumed not to be a confirmed paid laundry setup.

The listing specifically mentions on-site laundry located on the ground floor only. There is no language suggesting laundry rooms on every floor, such as "laundry on each floor" or similar phrases. Based on this, the building does not appear to have community laundry on every floor.

At least one unit currently has use of an on-site stall and there is a waitlist for building stalls, confirming that the co-op provides parking on the property. The MLS checkbox data (NONE) appears to refer to this specific listing’s lack of a conveyed stall, not the absence of building parking.

The mention of “one assigned stall” and a building-managed waitlist shows stalls are designated/assigned to specific units or occupants. Buyers can reasonably expect that parking, when available, is assigned rather than first-come-first-served.

Across 2/2 listings, parking is mentioned only as generic stalls with a waitlist, with no reference to a garage, carport, or covered structure. In a small 4-story walk-up where covered parking would be a selling point, its consistent omission plus MLS data strongly suggests parking is uncovered only.

The listing explains that parking stalls belong to the co-op as a whole and are assigned, not permanently attached to a specific unit. The fact that the current stall will be removed when ownership changes further confirms parking is not deeded. Therefore, parking is treated as a building-controlled resource rather than individually owned with the unit.

Neither of the 2 listings references EV charging despite discussing parking details and building amenities. Given the building type and the complete lack of mention or MLS EV flags, it is very likely there are no EV charging facilities.

The remarks describe that parking stalls belong to the co-op and are assigned with a waiting list but do not state whether there is a monthly parking fee. Terms like 'parking fee,' 'monthly parking charge,' or 'additional parking cost' do not appear. As a result, the presence or absence of a parking fee is unknown from these remarks.

Both listings describe constrained, waitlisted parking with no indication of separate guest spaces. In a small, stall-limited co-op, the combination of scarcity and no mention across 2/2 listings indicates there is effectively no dedicated guest parking.

Parking is only described as building-owned stalls with a waitlist, with no language about gates, security access, or controlled entry. The consistent lack of any secured-parking mention or flags supports that there is no secured-entry parking system.

Across 2/2 listings, parking is described only in terms of assigned stalls and a waitlist, with no reference to tandem or back-to-back arrangements. This omission, combined with absent tandem MLS codes, makes it very likely there is no tandem parking setup.

Both listings frame the building as a small walk-up with basic assigned stalls and a waitlist, not a full-service property. The absence of any reference to valet or attended parking, plus the building profile, supports that valet parking is not offered.

The listing clearly states that there is a waiting list system for parking stalls in this co-op building. This indicates that parking is limited and allocated via a formal waitlist. The presence of this explicit language provides strong evidence of a parking waitlist.

Remarks for both units call the project a '4-story walk up,' implying access by stairs only. With no elevator indicated in MLS amenities and clear textual confirmation, an elevator—keyed or otherwise—is almost certainly absent. Thus keyed or fob-secured elevator access is not a feature of this building.

The public remarks describe the building as a 4-story walk-up with charm and mention features like on-site laundry and an outdoor shower, but do not reference any card or fob access system. I specifically looked for terms such as key card access, fob access, electronic entry, or card reader and found none, so it is likely there is no security card system in place.

Across 2 listings, there is no reference to a security guard or on-site security personnel, and the building is characterized simply as a 4-story walk-up with 'golden days charm.' MLS security checkboxes are consistently left unchecked, suggesting the building does not offer guard services. Given multiple agents omitting any such feature, it is very likely there is no staffed security guard.

The remarks focus on location, co-op structure, unit features, and building amenities, with no indication of any security patrol or roving security service. I searched for explicit references to patrols or security services and found none, so the building is assumed not to have a security patrol.

The 2 available listings focus on location, beach proximity, laundry, outdoor shower, and parking, with no mention of cameras or video security. With SECSYS not selected on either MLS sheet, there is strong evidence this building does not advertise or provide a formal video security system. It is therefore very likely that a dedicated security video system is not a building feature.

Across 2 listings for this 4-story walk-up co-op, there are no MLS checkboxes or remarks indicating central air ('central A/C', 'HVAC', 'forced air', etc.). One listing instead describes 'Window AC in the bedroom' and both focus on natural ventilation ('cool cross breezes'), strongly suggesting the building does not offer central air conditioning in its units.

In 2 separate listings, there are no MLS flags or remarks for split/ductless A/C systems, and one unit is explicitly advertised with a window A/C rather than a split unit. Given that split systems are a major selling point in Waikiki and would almost certainly be called out, the evidence indicates this building does not currently offer split A/C in its units.

At least one listing clearly notes 'Window AC in the bedroom' and the MLS window-A/C code (ACWIUN) appears on 1 of 2 listings for this co-op. This is strong evidence that some units in the building have window A/C units and that the building permits this type of cooling.

MLS data shows 1 of 2 listings identifying concrete construction, and both listings describe a 4-story walk-up co-op in central Waikiki, a building type that is almost always concrete-based. No remarks contradict concrete construction, so the MLS checkbox plus typical local construction patterns are treated as moderately strong evidence.

Both listings (0/2) omit double-wall construction in the MLS checkboxes, and the described 4-story co-op form is inconsistent with typical wood double-wall residential construction. This provides strong evidence that the building is not primarily double-wall construction.

MLS data shows 1 out of 2 listings reporting hollow-tile construction, and the building is a mid-century style 4-story walk-up, where concrete block/hollow tile is typical. Although the remarks don’t explicitly mention materials, the MLS selection and common local practice together provide moderate support for hollow-tile construction.

Neither of the 2 MLS entries marks ‘masonry & stucco,’ yet the described “4-story walk up” co-op in Waikiki fits the common pattern of masonry walls finished in stucco. In the absence of contrary information, this typical construction pattern is treated as modest but plausible evidence that the building has masonry-and-stucco construction.

No MLS entries (0/2) indicate steel frame, and the remarks only describe a “4-story walk up” with “golden days charm,” not a high-rise or modern steel structure. Based on both the MLS omissions and typical local construction for this building type, it is very likely not steel-frame construction.

0 of 2 MLS listings explicitly mark slab, but the building is an in-town 4-story walk-up, a configuration that in Waikiki is almost always concrete slab-on-grade or similar. In the absence of contrary indications, typical construction practice provides moderately strong evidence of slab construction.

No analysis available

Out of 2 listings, 1 indicates wood frame construction in the MLS data, while the remarks for both units are silent on structure. Given that agents often select multiple structural types and nothing in the text conflicts with wood framing in parts of the building, this is treated as implied but somewhat uncertain evidence that wood framing is present somewhere in the structure.

Across 2 listings, none mark ‘above ground’ construction, and the remarks describe an urban 4-story walk-up, which in this area is typically slab-on-grade or similar. This strongly suggests the building is not an above-ground/post-and-pier style structure.

Neither of the 2 listings marks brick construction, and the remarks never mention brick or a brick exterior. Given local building practices and the absence of any textual or MLS indication, this building is almost certainly not brick construction.

0 of 2 listings indicate single-wall construction, and the property is a multi-story co-op building, not an older single-wall house. Given both MLS data and structural feasibility, it is almost certain this building is not single-wall construction.

The listing clearly indicates that the building is for residential use only and explicitly prohibits vacation rentals, with a minimum rental term of 90 days. This means short-term rentals (STR) are not allowed in this building.

Because short-term rentals are not allowed, participation in any hotel rental pool is not possible in this building. The remarks also contain no references to a hotel rental program, hotel management, or similar arrangements.

A mandatory hotel rental pool cannot exist here since STR is prohibited in the building. The remarks do not reference any required or optional rental program for owners.

Remarks note that this is a co-op and that the city tax department classifies 'fee simple co-ops' as leasehold projects, implying the underlying project is fee simple. Both observed listings are marketed as leasehold co-op interests, with 0 of 2 explicitly marked Fee Simple in MLS despite this clarification.

At least one listing is 'listed as leasehold' and clarifies that owners technically lease their units from the co-op, so the units function as leasehold interests. Both of the observed listings are presented as leasehold co-op units, even though the co-op is described as owning the land fee simple.

Searched for any 4-digit year tied to lease terms (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'ground lease ends') and found none. Without an explicit expiry year, the leasehold expiration date remains unknown.

Searched for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and 'VA loans accepted' but found none. In the absence of any such references, the building is assumed not VA-approved based on current remarks.

The remarks mention that monthly fees include water/sewer, cable, and co-op property tax, but do not reference insurance coverage. In the absence of explicit statements about full or walls-in insurance, full building insurance cannot be confirmed.

Across both listings there is no reference to fire sprinklers, and the MLS amenities do not show a sprinkler feature. Given the building’s age and type (1959, 4-story walk-up co-op) and the absence of any mention, it is likely there is no building-wide fire sprinkler system.

The remarks were checked for terms like fire life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire inspection, or safety certification and none were found. With no explicit evidence, it's assumed the fire/life safety evaluation status is not confirmed as passed.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Neither of the 2 recent listings nor the MLS view descriptions mention any ocean or water views. For a 4‑story walk‑up in dense central Waikiki, the lack of any ‘ocean view’ marketing strongly suggests that no units have meaningful ocean views.

No listings or MLS view fields mention mountain or mauka views across the 2 samples. Given the low-rise height and likely obstructions, it is very probable that this building does not offer notable mountain-view units.

Across 2 listings, there are no references to Diamond Head views in remarks or MLS view descriptions. Because agents almost always highlight Diamond Head views when available, the consistent omission indicates they are not a feature of this building.

One of the two recent MLS entries explicitly flags CITY in the view field, and both remarks emphasize the central Waikiki, people‑watching location. This supports that some units offer city/urban views that buyers may seek.

Neither agent remarks nor MLS view fields mention coastline or shoreline views. Given that coastline views would be heavily marketed if present, their absence indicates this is not a feature of the building.

Across 2 listings, agents do not mention garden or courtyard views, only urban and beach-close living. This consistent omission suggests the building does not offer meaningful garden views as a selling feature.

There are no remarks or MLS view codes indicating golf course views across the 2 listings. Given the building’s low height and beach‑proximate location, it is highly unlikely any units have golf course views.

Neither listing nor MLS data reference marina, harbor, or canal views. Its central/southeast Waikiki location and low height make marina views effectively non-existent for this project.

None of the 2 listings or MLS view fields reference sunrise or east-facing views. Since sunset views are explicitly marketed instead, sunrise views are unlikely to be a notable feature of this building.

A current listing for this building specifically advertises ‘sunset views’ from the lanai. This explicit statement from an agent confirms that some units in the project offer sunset views.

There are no references to cemetery views across 2 listings or in the MLS view data. Its central Waikiki resort setting makes cemetery views extremely unlikely for this project.

Looked for wording such as 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or similar descriptions but none appeared. Without explicit mention, a fireworks view from the building cannot be confirmed.

No analysis available

0/2 listings mention pets, dogs, or cats, even though they discuss other rules like "Residential use only, No vacation rental & currently minimum 90 days." Because neither an allowance nor a prohibition is stated, the building is not currently confirmed as pet-friendly and is treated as not having a verified pets-allowed policy.

The listings describe building features like laundry, outdoor shower, parking, and co-op approval but never mention a resident or on-site manager. With MLS amenities also omitting a resident manager, it is likely the building does not have a live-in/on-site manager.

0/2 listings mention any hotel program, front desk, or condotel operations; instead one states "Residential use only, No vacaion rental & currently minimum 90 days." The building is marketed as a residential co-op, not a condo-hotel, so condotel status is confidently ruled out.

2/2 listings clearly identify the building as a cooperative: "this project is a co-op," "Buyer must be approved by Co-op management," and "Parking stalls belong to this coop building" plus "co-op property tax." Consistent language across agents and MLS COOTAX support confirms the building is a co-op.