Alexander Towers
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Alexander Towers
Building Overview
Alexander Towers in McCully-Moiliili (built 1979) - concrete construction with onsite pool; assigned covered parking. Based on MLS data.
About Alexander Towers
Alexander Towers is located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood and was built in 1979. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the building offers an onsite pool. No other common-area amenities are listed in the available records.
Additional details from MLS show covered, assigned parking plus guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS. Buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with listing agents or condo management, as this summary is based solely on MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or clear phrases indicating the percent owner-occupied. The remarks mention the building is suitable for owners or renters and appeal to first-time buyers, but provide no numeric or strong qualitative indication of owner-occupancy, so a percentage cannot be determined from the remarks.
I searched the remarks for explicit counts such as '4 elevators', 'four elevators', or 'multiple elevators'. Several remarks reference 'the elevators' and proximity to them, but there is no explicit numeric count, so I cannot assign a number without guessing.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Multiple listings and MLS checkbox data indicate cable is included (6 of 11 current records show CABTV). Public remarks explicitly state "Maintenance fee includes ... basic CATV," and this language appears across agent listings, giving strong, consistent evidence.
MLS history indicates common electric was often listed as included (OTCOEX present in multiple records), but multiple public remarks explicitly state "electricity is sub‑metered and charged back separately to apartment owner" or similar. Evidence is mixed—historical checkbox data supports inclusion while multiple agent remarks contradict it, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly say 'Electricity is sub-metered and charged back' or 'electricity is submetered and billed ... in addition to the maintenance fee,' indicating building electricity is not included in the maintenance fee. This is corroborated by MLS checkbox usage and agent remarks across listings.
No analysis available
7 of 11 current MLS records list HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, while 0 listings show WTRHTR in inclusions. None of the public remarks explicitly state 'hot water included' (remarks only mention 'maintenance fee includes water, sewer' once), so the MLS checkbox implies hot water is included but agent remarks do not consistently confirm it.
Multiple MLS records have internet checked (6 of 11) and at least one listing explicitly states "Maintenance fee includes ... internet," providing consistent evidence across agents and MLS checkboxes that internet is included.
There is no mention of marina, boat slips, or marina access in any public remarks, and only one MLS record lists MARINA. Given absence of corroborating remarks and minimal MLS usage, marina fees are not treated as included.
All current MLS records show SEWER checked (11 of 11) and agent remarks explicitly state "Maintenance fee includes ... sewer," giving very strong, consistent evidence that sewer is included in the maintenance fee.
Water is listed in nearly all MLS records (10 of 11) and public remarks explicitly say "Maintenance fee includes water," so there is strong, consistent evidence that water is included in the maintenance fee.
BBQ is mentioned explicitly in at least 2 of the concatenated public remarks: e.g., 'community pool, BBQ area and guest parking' and 'Amenities include a community pool, BBQ area and guest parking.' Current MLS also shows some listings with BBQ checked (4/11 historically; some current listings checked). Evidence is moderate across multiple agents and consistent enough to include the amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash area is explicitly referenced in numerous remarks (e.g., 'car wash area', 'car washing area', 'car washing area' and 'car wash area' across several listings). Historical MLS confidence is high (many listings previously checked), and current remarks consistently mention the car wash amenity, making the evidence strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation area is repeatedly mentioned across the public remarks (phrases include 'recreation area', 'recreational space', 'recreational space', 'recreational area' and 'recreational space/amenities'). CURRENT MLS also shows recreation amenity checked on several listings (3/11 currently noted). The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for terms such as 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', or combined 'bike and surfboard storage' and found none. Amenities listed include pool, recreational/party area, car wash area, bike rack, guest parking, BBQ, and on-site management, but nothing specific to surfboard storage. Based on the absence of any reference, surfboard storage is assumed not to be provided.
No analysis available
Trash chute (trash chutes) is explicitly mentioned in the remarks ('there is an onsite manager, trash chutes, fire sprinklers...') and historical MLS data strongly supported this feature (checked on the majority of listings). Given the strong historical and supporting remark evidence, include trash chute with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a shared swimming pool: 11/11 current MLS listings have the POOL amenity checked and numerous agent remarks explicitly state amenities such as "swimming pool," "community pool," "pool/party area," and "recreation area." Mentions appear across multiple listings and agents rather than isolated, indicating the pool is a real shared building amenity.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for indications that the pool is salt water, including terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', or 'saline', and found no matches. All references are to a standard swimming pool, so the pool is assumed not to be salt water based on available remarks.
Strong evidence that some units have in-unit laundry: at least five remarks explicitly state 'washer/dryer in the unit', 'washer and dryer included', or 'washer-dryer... included'. This confirmation appears across multiple listing remarks (likely from different agents/entries) rather than being a single isolated note, supporting that the building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
Remarks were checked for any indication of paid community laundry, including terms like coin-op, card-operated, or paid laundry facilities, and none were mentioned. Listings instead reference in-unit washer/dryers with no payment system described. In the absence of evidence, paid community laundry is assumed not to be present.
Remarks were searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' or any shared laundry description, and none were found. Instead, listings emphasize in-unit washer/dryer, which suggests there may not be separate community laundry on every floor. Based on this absence, the feature is marked as not present.
Parking is consistently reported across all listings: 11/11 MLS records include parking features. Multiple remarks explicitly state assigned or covered stalls ('1 partial covered, secured parking', 'covered parking stall', 'one assigned covered parking stall') and several mention guest parking. Evidence is strong and consistent across agents and listings, indicating the building offers parking.
At least several listings explicitly state assigned or reserved stalls, including 'one assigned covered parking stall' and references to a 'parking stall in gated garage.' Historical MLS checkbox data (8/9) also strongly indicates assigned parking across the building, and the remarks are consistent across multiple agents.
Strong, consistent evidence across listings that the building offers covered parking: 8 of 10 current listings (per MLS) and multiple remarks state phrases like '1 covered parking stall', 'one assigned covered parking stall', and 'parking stall in gated garage'. This is corroborated across different agent remarks rather than a single isolated listing, indicating the building does provide covered parking stalls/garage spaces.
I reviewed all parking-related remarks for language such as 'deeded', 'owned', or 'included in deed'. Listings consistently describe 'assigned/covered/secured' stalls (quotes: '1 uncovered, secured parking', 'covered parking stall', 'one assigned covered parking stall') but never indicate the stall is deeded, so parking_deeded is set to false with medium-low confidence.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or additional parking cost language. The remarks describe assigned/covered/guest parking but provide no indication of a separate parking fee, so the presence/amount of a parking fee is unknown.
Guest parking is mentioned across several listings with consistent specifics (e.g., '3 limited time parking stalls and 5 extended time parking stalls' and 'multiple guest parking'), and MLS checkbox history (5/9) corroborates the presence of guest parking.
Several remarks reference security features related to parking—'gated garage', 'partial covered secured parking', plus mentions that the building is 'secured'—and historical MLS entries (6/9) list secured entry for parking, indicating building parking has controlled/gated access.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for phrases like 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list for parking', or similar. Listings reference assigned and guest parking but do not mention a waitlist system, so set to false with low confidence (absence of evidence).
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like key card, keycard entry, fob access, card reader, or electronic access and found none. While the building is described as secured, there is no explicit evidence that access is controlled by a card/fob system, so this feature is set to false based on current information.
No analysis available
I looked for any indication of a security patrol or roving security service and found no references in the listings. Given this absence in multiple detailed descriptions, it is likely the building does not have a dedicated security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the 11 current MLS listings includes ACWIUN in the inclusions, but none of the 11 public remark blocks mention 'window AC', 'window unit', or 'window air conditioner'—remarks only reference ceiling fans and cross ventilation. Evidence suggests a single listing indicates window AC (possibly copy‑paste), so the building may offer window units but the documentation is sparse; confidence is low.
All 11 current MLS listings for the building list construction_materials = 'CONCRE', and prior historical data rated concrete construction with High confidence. Public remarks describe a 15-story tower but do not explicitly say 'concrete'; however, unanimous agent checkbox data across multiple listings strongly indicates the building is concrete construction rather than an isolated copy/paste error.
No analysis available
Limited evidence for hollow tile: 2 of 9 current listings list HOLTIL in construction_materials, but the majority mark concrete and none of the public remarks mention hollow tile construction. This suggests hollow tile is either present in a small portion or results from inconsistent checkbox use by agents; included for buyers but flagged with moderate confidence.
Limited and weak evidence for masonry/stucco: only 2 of 10 current listings list MASSTU in construction_materials, and none of the public remarks contain phrases like 'masonry' or 'stucco'. Given the lack of supporting remarks and no historical support, the masonry/stucco attribute is likely incorrect and omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mixed evidence for 'above ground' construction: 3 of 9 current listings include ABOGRO, but historical records show it only in a minority of listings and no public remarks describe 'above ground' materials. The checkbox presence across a few listings warrants including it as a possible building attribute for searchers, but confidence is moderate due to lack of corroborating remarks and inconsistent agent reporting.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for explicit STR language such as 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', 'NUC', or conversely minimum-stay restrictions. There is no evidence in the public remarks that STRs are allowed, so set to false with medium-low confidence.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or hotel management references. Although the building has a swimming pool, there is no indication of participation in a hotel rental pool; because str_allowed is false, this is false with low confidence.
Looked for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program'. No such language is present; given STRs are not indicated as allowed, mandatory pool participation is false with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring in', or explicit renewal years. No leasehold or expiry year is mentioned in any remark, so the expiry year is unknown.
Searched all remarks for explicit phrases such as 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted'. None of the listings reference VA loan approval, so set to false with low confidence due to absence of evidence.
I searched the remarks for any indication that the HOA provides full/walls-in insurance (phrases like 'fully insured' or 'walls-in coverage'). There were no explicit insurance-coverage statements, so full building insurance cannot be confirmed from these remarks.
Strong evidence across multiple listings that the building has a fire sprinkler system: at least 6 separate remark segments reference sprinklers with phrases like 'fire sprinkler systems and alarms', 'sprinkler leak within the apartment', and 'equipped with a sprinkler system'. Mentions come from different agent remarks across the building listings and confirm the historical MLS checkbox data, so include the feature with high confidence.
I searched for explicit FLSE/fire inspection language. The listings repeatedly note fire sprinkler systems, alarms, and smoke detectors, but do not explicitly state that a fire/life safety evaluation was passed, so FLSE status cannot be confirmed from the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple public remarks explicitly state "views of the city and mountains" and "city and mountains" (appearing across several listings), indicating the building offers mountain (mauka/Koolau) views. Evidence is explicit across different listings and agents rather than a single copy/paste, so confidence is high.
MLS checkbox shows Diamond Head (DIAHEA) in 1 listing, but none of the public remarks reference Diamond Head (0 listings mention 'Diamond Head' or 'DH view'). Because the feature appears only in a small number of MLS checkboxes and is not described in agent remarks, this is treated as implied (some units may have the view) rather than strongly confirmed.
City views are repeatedly noted in the public remarks (quotes include 'large 110 square foot lanai with views of the city and mountains' and 'Nice lanai with city views'), with at least 3–4 listings mentioning city views and 4/10 MLS view checkboxes marked CITY. Evidence is strong across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks explicitly reference eastern exposure—"east tower" and "dining area faces east"—which implies sunrise views/morning sun for units with that orientation. Although MLS SUNRIS was not checked, multiple remarks provide direct evidence of eastern-facing units, so the feature is included.
None of the 11 current listings include SUNSET in their view descriptions (0/11). Remarks repeatedly note east-facing orientation (e.g., "dining area faces east", "on the east tower") and mention city/mountain views but contain no mentions of "sunset", "western exposure", or evening/west views. Given the absence of any sunset-related language across multiple listings and the MLS checkbox being unchecked, there is strong evidence the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from your lanai', or similar. The listings only mention city and mountain views, so there is no indication of a fireworks view from the building.
No analysis available
Multiple listings (at least 3–4 segments) explicitly note a manager on site with phrases like 'onsite manager', 'business hours site manager', and 'daytime property manager'. These consistent, repeated mentions align with prior high-confidence data indicating the building has a resident/on-site manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.