Alexander Towers
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Alexander Towers
Building Overview
Alexander Towers in McCully-Moiliili (built 1979) - concrete construction with onsite pool; assigned covered parking. Based on MLS data.
About Alexander Towers
Alexander Towers is located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood and was built in 1979. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the building offers an onsite pool. No other common-area amenities are listed in the available records.
Additional details from MLS show covered, assigned parking plus guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS. Buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with listing agents or condo management, as this summary is based solely on MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit percentages and phrases such as "owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," and "highly owner occupied," but none appeared. The owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
The listings provide evidence that the building has multiple elevators, but none states whether there are two, three, four, or another exact number. The elevator count therefore remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No listings in the current MLS data indicate that maintenance fees include central air conditioning. The remarks consistently list other inclusions only—water, sewer, basic cable TV, internet, and submetered electricity—and one mention of a "bedroom a/c" refers to an in-unit unit, not a building fee inclusion. This looks like a clear omission rather than a copy-paste pattern, so the feature should be corrected to false.
Three listings explicitly mention cable inclusion, using the phrases "basic cable tv" and "basic CATV." This aligns with CABTV appearing in 11 of 19 current MLS records and the previously high-confidence determination.
Common-area electricity appears moderately supported by the MLS pattern, with 11 of 18 listings checking OTCOEX. The public remarks mention electrical upgrades and submetered unit electricity, but they do not clearly confirm common-area electricity, so this remains a moderate-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
Several listings (multiple agent remarks) explicitly state 'electricity is sub-metered and charged back separately to the apartment owner' or 'electricity is submetered and billed with the maintenance fee but is in addition to the maintenance fee.' This is consistent across agents and strongly indicates unit electricity is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
Hot water appears to be included based on current MLS records, with 10 of 18 listings checking HOTWAT. The public remarks do not explicitly mention hot water, and there is no WTRHTR signal that would argue against it, so this is a moderate-confidence building-level feature.
Three listings state that the maintenance fee includes "internet." The current MLS also marks INTSER in 9 of 19 listings, supporting the previously high-confidence conclusion despite the feature appearing in only some remarks.
There is no mention of marina, boat slips, or marina access in any public remarks, and only one MLS record lists MARINA. Given absence of corroborating remarks and minimal MLS usage, marina fees are not treated as included.
Three listings explicitly say the maintenance fee includes "sewer." SEWER is checked in 19 of 19 current MLS listings, making sewer inclusion strongly supported across the building.
Three listings explicitly state that the maintenance fee includes "water." WATER appears in 18 of 19 current MLS records, consistent with the previously high-confidence conclusion.
The building is repeatedly described as having BBQ amenities across the listings, including explicit phrases like "BBQ facilities" and "BBQ area." This appears in multiple remarks from different listings and fits the existing high-confidence historical data, so it is strongly supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 5 listings explicitly mention a "car wash area" or "car washing area," including descriptions of the building's amenities. The evidence is repeated across multiple listings and is consistent with the high historical confidence and current MLS designation in 10/19 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe patio/deck-style outdoor space, including an "enclosed 110 sq. ft. Patio" and several "enclosed lanai" / "nice lanai" remarks. Evidence appears across different listings and agents, so this looks like a real building/unit feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention a shared recreation amenity using several consistent phrases, including "recreation area," "recreational area," "recreational space," and "pool/party area." The repeated references across many remarks support this as a real building-level feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for terms such as 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', or combined 'bike and surfboard storage' and found none. Amenities listed include pool, recreational/party area, car wash area, bike rack, guest parking, BBQ, and on-site management, but nothing specific to surfboard storage. Based on the absence of any reference, surfboard storage is assumed not to be provided.
No analysis available
One listing explicitly confirms "trash chutes" at Alexander Towers. Although the feature is mentioned less often in public remarks than the car wash, 17/19 current MLS listings include TRACHU and historical confidence is high, making the building-level feature well supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool is strongly supported by current remarks across 13 of 19 listings, including phrases such as “swimming pool and recreational area,” “pool, BBQ, recreation area,” “community pool,” and “swimming pool/party area.” This aligns with the prior high-confidence evidence and the current MLS data showing pool-related amenities on all 19 listings.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for indications that the pool is salt water, including terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', or 'saline', and found no matches. All references are to a standard swimming pool, so the pool is assumed not to be salt water based on available remarks.
At least 5 listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry, using phrases such as "washer/dryer in the unit" and "washer and dryer in the unit." This is strongly corroborated by current MLS data showing washer/dryer included in all 19 of 19 listings, across multiple listing remarks and agents.
No analysis available
Remarks were checked for any indication of paid community laundry, including terms like coin-op, card-operated, or paid laundry facilities, and none were mentioned. Listings instead reference in-unit washer/dryers with no payment system described. In the absence of evidence, paid community laundry is assumed not to be present.
Remarks were searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' or any shared laundry description, and none were found. Instead, listings emphasize in-unit washer/dryer, which suggests there may not be separate community laundry on every floor. Based on this absence, the feature is marked as not present.
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building: current MLS data identifies parking on 19/19 listings, and approximately 17 of the 19 remarks mention parking such as "1 assigned parking," "one covered parking stall," "parking stall in gated garage," or secured parking. The evidence is repeated across many listings and agents, including references to guest parking and covered or secured facilities.
Assigned parking is consistently documented, with 15/19 current MLS listings marked ASSIGN and approximately 10 or more remarks explicitly using phrases such as "1 assigned parking stall," "1 assigned covered parking," and "one assigned covered parking stall." This repeated, specific language across multiple listings strongly confirms that assigned parking is available in the building.
Covered parking is clearly present and repeatedly described in the remarks. Several listings mention "covered parking stall," "assigned covered parking stall," "covered parking on the second floor," and "parking stall in gated garage," confirming the building offers covered parking options. The consistent wording across multiple listings supports a strong building-level feature.
Multiple listings state that the unit has one assigned, covered, secured, or included parking stall. However, none explicitly say the stall is deeded, owned, or included in the unit deed, so deeded ownership is not confirmed.
No analysis available
The remarks describe assigned parking, covered parking, secured garages, and guest stalls but do not state a monthly parking fee, rental charge, or additional parking cost. The amount is therefore unknown.
Guest parking is well supported. Several listings mention “guest stalls on site,” “guest parking,” and exact details such as “3 limited time parking stalls and 5 extended time parking stalls.” The repetition across listings makes this a strong building-level feature.
Secured entry for parking/building access is repeatedly confirmed in the remarks. Listings mention "secured building," "secure entry/parking," "secure entrance to building and parking," and "secured, covered parking," showing this is a stable building feature rather than a checkbox artifact. Evidence appears across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for parking waitlist, waiting-list, or instructions to join a list. None were found; listings instead describe assigned parking and available guest parking.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like key card, keycard entry, fob access, card reader, or electronic access and found none. While the building is described as secured, there is no explicit evidence that access is controlled by a card/fob system, so this feature is set to false based on current information.
No analysis available
I looked for any indication of a security patrol or roving security service and found no references in the listings. Given this absence in multiple detailed descriptions, it is likely the building does not have a dedicated security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited evidence that some units in the building have window air conditioning: 3 of 16 current MLS listings include ACWIUN. None of the provided public remarks explicitly say 'window AC,' 'window unit,' or 'wall AC,' so this may reflect MLS copy rather than consistently described building-wide features.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS record, with CONCRE listed in construction_materials for 17 of 18 current listings. The public remarks do not explicitly use phrases such as 'concrete building' or 'reinforced concrete,' but the repeated MLS designation across many listings and the prior high-confidence history make this evidence strong rather than an isolated agent entry.
There is no remark-based evidence for double-wall construction across the listings reviewed. Only 4 of 17 current MLS records check DOUWAL, which is too weak to support the feature, and the remarks focus on renovations, amenities, and location rather than construction type. This looks more like inconsistent MLS entry than a confirmed building characteristic.
Limited evidence for hollow tile: 2 of 9 current listings list HOLTIL in construction_materials, but the majority mark concrete and none of the public remarks mention hollow tile construction. This suggests hollow tile is either present in a small portion or results from inconsistent checkbox use by agents; included for buyers but flagged with moderate confidence.
Limited and weak evidence for masonry/stucco: only 2 of 10 current listings list MASSTU in construction_materials, and none of the public remarks contain phrases like 'masonry' or 'stucco'. Given the lack of supporting remarks and no historical support, the masonry/stucco attribute is likely incorrect and omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is moderate evidence for above-ground construction. 5 of 18 current listings include ABOGRO in construction_materials, and the remarks repeatedly describe the property as a 15-story/high-rise tower, which supports the classification indirectly. The evidence is not explicit enough to be high confidence, but it is consistent across multiple listings rather than appearing as a single copy-paste anomaly.
Public remarks across the provided listings do not describe the building as brick, and there are no site-visit style comments confirming brick exterior or brick construction. The only support is a single MLS checkbox among 15 listings, which is too weak on its own and looks like a likely inconsistency in the MLS data.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for STR, vacation-rental, NUC, TVU, legal short-term rental, minimum-stay, and owner-occupancy language. No such references were found, so public remarks provide no support for short-term-rental permission.
No remarks mention a hotel rental pool, hotel rental program, hotel management, or participation in a branded hotel pool. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this feature is false under the prerequisite rule.
The remarks contain no language stating that owners must participate in a hotel or rental pool, cannot opt out, or are required to rent their units. Because STR and hotel-pool participation are not supported, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold language, ground-lease terms, lease expiration dates, and renewal or extension years. No specific lease-expiry year or related information was found.
The remarks were searched for explicit terms such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted." None were found, so there is no public-remarks evidence that the building is VA approved.
The listings discuss maintenance fees and other building features but provide no evidence that the HOA carries full building insurance or walls-in coverage. The feature is therefore not supported by the remarks.
Strong, repeated evidence confirms fire sprinklers at Alexander Towers. Multiple listings explicitly mention the feature across different agents and time periods, with about 8+ remarks using phrases such as "fire sprinkler systems," "fire sprinklers," and "sprinkler system." The consistency across listings suggests this is a real building feature, not just MLS copy-paste noise.
The remarks repeatedly mention fire sprinklers, smoke detectors, alarms, and secure entry, but these do not establish that a formal fire/life safety evaluation was passed. No direct FLSE or equivalent certification language was found.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are supported by both the current MLS data and multiple public remarks. One listing explicitly states "views of the city and mountains," which directly confirms mountain views for the building, and this is consistent with the broader MLS pattern rather than a one-off agent copy.
1 listing explicitly references a "partial Diamond Head view," which is strong direct evidence that some units in the building offer Diamond Head views. The remark appears as a specific unit description rather than generic copy-paste, making this a reliable building-level feature for search purposes.
City views are strongly supported across the building, with 14/19 listings identifying CITY views. Multiple remarks explicitly reference "pleasant city views," "views of the city and mountains," and "city views," indicating consistent evidence from multiple listings rather than a single unsupported checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks explicitly reference eastern exposure—"east tower" and "dining area faces east"—which implies sunrise views/morning sun for units with that orientation. Although MLS SUNRIS was not checked, multiple remarks provide direct evidence of eastern-facing units, so the feature is included.
None of the 11 current listings include SUNSET in their view descriptions (0/11). Remarks repeatedly note east-facing orientation (e.g., "dining area faces east", "on the east tower") and mention city/mountain views but contain no mentions of "sunset", "western exposure", or evening/west views. Given the absence of any sunset-related language across multiple listings and the MLS checkbox being unchecked, there is strong evidence the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from your lanai', or similar. The listings only mention city and mountain views, so there is no indication of a fireworks view from the building.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly indicate a resident/on-site manager is present. Remarks cite "onsite manager," "business hours site manager," and "daytime property manager," which is strong corroboration across separate listings. This appears to be a stable building-level amenity rather than a mistaken MLS checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.