Alexander Towers
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Alexander Towers
Building Overview
Alexander Towers in McCully-Moiliili (built 1979) - concrete construction with onsite pool; assigned covered parking. Based on MLS data.
About Alexander Towers
Alexander Towers is located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood and was built in 1979. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the building offers an onsite pool. No other common-area amenities are listed in the available records.
Additional details from MLS show covered, assigned parking plus guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS. Buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with listing agents or condo management, as this summary is based solely on MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy figures or qualitative statements like "80% owner occupied" or "mostly owner occupied." Nothing in the remarks addresses ownership mix, so the percentage is unknown.
I looked for an explicit elevator count such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or similar wording. The remarks only confirm that elevators exist, not how many, so the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Evidence is strong that cable TV is included in the maintenance fee. One public remark explicitly says, 'Maintenance fee includes water, sewer, basic CATV, and internet,' which aligns with the MLS checkbox data showing CABTV in many current listings.
There is moderate MLS support that common-area electricity may be included, with 7 of 13 current listings checking OTCOEX. However, no public remarks directly confirm common electricity, so this appears to rely mainly on MLS checkbox data and may reflect agent copy/paste rather than explicit verification.
No analysis available
Several listings (multiple agent remarks) explicitly state 'electricity is sub-metered and charged back separately to the apartment owner' or 'electricity is submetered and billed with the maintenance fee but is in addition to the maintenance fee.' This is consistent across agents and strongly indicates unit electricity is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
Hot water appears to be included in the maintenance fee based on current MLS records: 8 of 12 listings show HOTWAT. The public remarks do not explicitly discuss hot water, and there is no evidence of a building-wide change or correction in the remarks, so the MLS majority is the best indicator here.
Evidence supports internet being included in the maintenance fee. One listing explicitly says the fee includes 'internet,' and current MLS association_fee_includes data shows INTSER in 5 of 13 listings. The remark is consistent with the MLS checkbox pattern, suggesting this is a real building-level feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
There is no mention of marina, boat slips, or marina access in any public remarks, and only one MLS record lists MARINA. Given absence of corroborating remarks and minimal MLS usage, marina fees are not treated as included.
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported across the data set. Current MLS records show SEWER in 13/13 listings, and a remark explicitly states, 'Maintenance fee includes water, sewer, basic CATV, and internet.'
Water inclusion is well supported by both MLS data and remarks. Current MLS records show WATER in 12/13 listings, and the public remark 'Maintenance fee includes water, sewer, basic CATV, and internet' directly confirms it.
BBQ/grilling facilities appear to be a real shared building amenity. Historical data showed BBQ in 5 of 13 listings, and current remarks explicitly mention 'community pool, BBQ area' / 'BBQ area' alongside other common amenities, which suggests this is not just a checkbox artifact. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and reads like repeated amenity copy-paste, but the BBQ mention is clear enough to trust.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash area is explicitly referenced in numerous remarks (e.g., 'car wash area', 'car washing area', 'car washing area' and 'car wash area' across several listings). Historical MLS confidence is high (many listings previously checked), and current remarks consistently mention the car wash amenity, making the evidence strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly state "recreation area," "recreational space," or "party area," indicating a shared amenity available to residents. The repeated references across multiple remarks support this as a building-level feature rather than an agent checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for terms such as 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', or combined 'bike and surfboard storage' and found none. Amenities listed include pool, recreational/party area, car wash area, bike rack, guest parking, BBQ, and on-site management, but nothing specific to surfboard storage. Based on the absence of any reference, surfboard storage is assumed not to be provided.
No analysis available
One listing directly says the building has "trash chutes," alongside other building systems like an onsite manager and fire sprinklers. Because the historical MLS confidence is already high and the remark is explicit, this is strong confirmation of the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported across the listings: multiple remarks explicitly say "swimming pool," "community pool," "pool," and "pool/party area." This appears in several separate listings and reads like a real shared amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly, aligning with the high-confidence MLS amenity data.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for indications that the pool is salt water, including terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', or 'saline', and found no matches. All references are to a standard swimming pool, so the pool is assumed not to be salt water based on available remarks.
Strong evidence that Alexander Towers offers in-unit laundry in some units. Current remarks explicitly mention "washer/dryer in the unit" and "washer-dryer ... included," which aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS data showing 13/13 listings with washer/dryer in inclusions. The repeated mentions across multiple listings suggest this is not a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Remarks were checked for any indication of paid community laundry, including terms like coin-op, card-operated, or paid laundry facilities, and none were mentioned. Listings instead reference in-unit washer/dryers with no payment system described. In the absence of evidence, paid community laundry is assumed not to be present.
Remarks were searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' or any shared laundry description, and none were found. Instead, listings emphasize in-unit washer/dryer, which suggests there may not be separate community laundry on every floor. Based on this absence, the feature is marked as not present.
Parking is consistently confirmed across the listings: all 13/13 current MLS records include parking features. Remarks mention '1 assigned parking stall,' 'fantastic covered parking stall,' '1 secured parking,' 'parking stall in gated garage,' and 'one covered parking,' showing this is a building-level feature rather than a one-off. Evidence is strong and repeated across multiple agents.
Assigned parking is well supported by both MLS data and remarks. Multiple listings explicitly say '1 assigned parking stall' or similar, while current MLS records show ASSIGN in 10/13 listings. This looks consistent across multiple agents and is not just copy-paste noise.
Strong, consistent evidence that the building offers covered parking: multiple listings mention "covered parking stall", "one covered parking", or "partial covered secured parking", and MLS checkbox data shows coverage in the majority of current listings. This is reflected across several agent remarks and appears to be a genuine building feature.
I searched for explicit deeded-parking language such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and found none. The remarks consistently describe the parking as assigned, secured, covered, or in a gated garage, which is not enough to call it deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any parking charge, monthly parking fee, or rental cost and found none. The listings describe parking availability and type, but do not mention an additional parking cost.
Guest parking is clearly present in the building. Several remarks reference 'guest parking' and even give details like '3 limited time parking stalls and 5 extended time parking stalls,' which is strong corroboration. Current MLS data also shows GUEST in 6/13 listings, confirming this is a building amenity.
Secured parking/entry is strongly supported by both MLS data and listing remarks. The remarks repeatedly use phrases like 'secure entrance to building and parking,' 'secured parking,' 'parking stall in gated garage,' and 'secure building,' matching the current MLS SECENT flags in 7/13 listings. This appears to be a real and consistent feature of the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," or "join waitlist for parking" and found nothing. The remarks suggest parking is assigned or included rather than managed through a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like key card, keycard entry, fob access, card reader, or electronic access and found none. While the building is described as secured, there is no explicit evidence that access is controlled by a card/fob system, so this feature is set to false based on current information.
No analysis available
I looked for any indication of a security patrol or roving security service and found no references in the listings. Given this absence in multiple detailed descriptions, it is likely the building does not have a dedicated security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data shows 2 of 12 current listings include ACWIUN (window air conditioning units), but none of the public remarks across the supplied listings mention window or wall AC—remarks instead reference ceiling fans. Historical confidence was Low, so the evidence for window AC is limited to a small number of MLS inclusions and is not strongly corroborated by agents' remarks.
Concrete construction is strongly supported: 13 of 13 current MLS listings list construction_materials = 'CONCRE'. The remarks do not explicitly say 'concrete,' but the MLS material field is unanimous, which is very strong building-level evidence.
There is no remark-based support for double-wall construction, and only 3 of 13 current listings check DOUWAL. Because this feature is neither consistently present nor described by agents, it should not be treated as confirmed for the building.
Limited evidence for hollow tile: 2 of 9 current listings list HOLTIL in construction_materials, but the majority mark concrete and none of the public remarks mention hollow tile construction. This suggests hollow tile is either present in a small portion or results from inconsistent checkbox use by agents; included for buyers but flagged with moderate confidence.
Limited and weak evidence for masonry/stucco: only 2 of 10 current listings list MASSTU in construction_materials, and none of the public remarks contain phrases like 'masonry' or 'stucco'. Given the lack of supporting remarks and no historical support, the masonry/stucco attribute is likely incorrect and omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate/implied evidence for 'above ground' construction: 4 of 12 current MLS listings include construction_materials = 'ABOGRO'. Public remarks contain no references to above-ground construction; the presence in only a minority of listings and lack of descriptive remarks suggests inconsistent agent reporting or partial applicability, so the feature is included with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, TVU, NUC, vacation rental, or 30-day minimum rules and found none. Because the remarks do not show any explicit permission for short-term rentals, this is best marked as not allowed based on available public remarks.
I searched for hotel pool language such as hotel-managed rental program, Hilton pool, or similar terms and found nothing. Since there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, hotel-pool participation must be false.
I looked for language indicating a required rental pool, such as mandatory participation, cannot opt out, or must be in a rental program, and found none. There is also no evidence of any hotel rental pool at all, so mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as a ground lease end date, lease expiry year, or renewal date and found nothing. The remarks do not mention lease tenure or any expiration year.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found none. The listings describe the unit, parking, amenities, and condition, but do not indicate VA eligibility.
I looked for language indicating full HOA insurance or walls-in coverage. The remarks do not mention insurance coverage at all, so this cannot be confirmed from the listings.
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings confirms this building has fire sprinklers. At least 7 remarks mention it directly with phrases like "fire sprinkler systems," "fire sprinklers," and "sprinkler system," which looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error. This aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS evidence, so the feature should remain true.
I searched the remarks for direct fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE passed or fire safety certified. None was found, so there is no evidence here that the building has passed a formal fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are supported by both historical MLS data and current public remarks. One listing explicitly states 'views of the city and mountains,' which aligns with the prior high-confidence assessment and suggests this is a real building-level offering, not a one-off agent error.
MLS checkbox shows Diamond Head (DIAHEA) in 1 listing, but none of the public remarks reference Diamond Head (0 listings mention 'Diamond Head' or 'DH view'). Because the feature appears only in a small number of MLS checkboxes and is not described in agent remarks, this is treated as implied (some units may have the view) rather than strongly confirmed.
City views are repeatedly confirmed across multiple listings, with at least two clear references: 'views of the city and mountains' and 'Nice lanai with city views.' The consistency across remarks supports this as a genuine building feature rather than copy-paste MLS noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks explicitly reference eastern exposure—"east tower" and "dining area faces east"—which implies sunrise views/morning sun for units with that orientation. Although MLS SUNRIS was not checked, multiple remarks provide direct evidence of eastern-facing units, so the feature is included.
None of the 11 current listings include SUNSET in their view descriptions (0/11). Remarks repeatedly note east-facing orientation (e.g., "dining area faces east", "on the east tower") and mention city/mountain views but contain no mentions of "sunset", "western exposure", or evening/west views. Given the absence of any sunset-related language across multiple listings and the MLS checkbox being unchecked, there is strong evidence the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from your lanai', or similar. The listings only mention city and mountain views, so there is no indication of a fireworks view from the building.
No analysis available
Multiple listings (at least 3–4 segments) explicitly note a manager on site with phrases like 'onsite manager', 'business hours site manager', and 'daytime property manager'. These consistent, repeated mentions align with prior high-confidence data indicating the building has a resident/on-site manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.