Alexander Towers
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Alexander Towers
Building Overview
Alexander Towers in McCully-Moiliili (built 1979) - concrete construction with onsite pool; assigned covered parking. Based on MLS data.
About Alexander Towers
Alexander Towers is located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood and was built in 1979. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the building offers an onsite pool. No other common-area amenities are listed in the available records.
Additional details from MLS show covered, assigned parking plus guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS. Buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with listing agents or condo management, as this summary is based solely on MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy figures such as "80% owner occupied" or phrases like "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." The remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy statistic or clear descriptive equivalent. Because no number is stated, the percentage cannot be determined from these listings.
I searched the remarks for an explicit elevator count such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators." The listings confirm elevators exist, but they do not state how many. Because there is no verified count in the remarks, the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
There is not enough building-level evidence that maintenance fees include central AC. The public remarks mention an in-unit "bedroom a/c" in one listing, which is not the same as central air included in HOA fees, and most remarks are silent on this point.
Cable TV inclusion is strongly supported. Public remarks explicitly state the maintenance fee includes "basic cable tv" and "basic CATV," and this matches the prior high-confidence MLS pattern. The evidence appears consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent note.
There is moderate MLS support that common-area electricity may be included in the fee, with 10 of 17 current listings checking OTCOEX. The public remarks do not explicitly confirm common-area electric, so this looks like MLS checkbox evidence rather than strong remark-based confirmation.
No analysis available
Several listings (multiple agent remarks) explicitly state 'electricity is sub-metered and charged back separately to the apartment owner' or 'electricity is submetered and billed with the maintenance fee but is in addition to the maintenance fee.' This is consistent across agents and strongly indicates unit electricity is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
Hot water appears to be included based on current MLS records, with 9 of 16 listings showing HOTWAT. The public remarks do not explicitly mention hot water, so this is supported more by the MLS pattern than by direct narrative confirmation. No contrary WTRHTR evidence was provided.
Internet inclusion is strongly supported. At least one public remark explicitly says the maintenance fee includes "internet," and the current MLS data also shows INTSER in multiple listings. This is consistent across the building and looks reliable.
There is no mention of marina, boat slips, or marina access in any public remarks, and only one MLS record lists MARINA. Given absence of corroborating remarks and minimal MLS usage, marina fees are not treated as included.
Sewer inclusion is clearly supported across the building. Current MLS data shows SEWER checked in all 17 of 17 listings, and the public remarks repeatedly say the maintenance fee includes "water, sewer," which is strong cross-listing confirmation.
Water inclusion is strongly supported. Current MLS data shows WATER checked in 16 of 17 listings, and several public remarks explicitly say the maintenance fee includes water, matching the MLS pattern across multiple listings.
Multiple listings explicitly say the building has "BBQ facilities" or a "BBQ area," alongside pool and recreation amenities. This appears across several remarks and agents, so it looks like a real shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly say the building has a "car wash area" or "car washing area," which is direct evidence of car wash facilities. This appears across multiple remarks and is consistent with the high-confidence historical MLS data, so the feature should remain included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe patio/deck-style outdoor space, including an "enclosed 110 sq. ft. Patio" and several "enclosed lanai" / "nice lanai" remarks. Evidence appears across different listings and agents, so this looks like a real building/unit feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Many listings reference a shared "recreation area," "recreational space," or "pool/party area," often paired with pool and guest parking. The repeated wording across multiple remarks strongly supports this as a building-level amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for terms such as 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', or combined 'bike and surfboard storage' and found none. Amenities listed include pool, recreational/party area, car wash area, bike rack, guest parking, BBQ, and on-site management, but nothing specific to surfboard storage. Based on the absence of any reference, surfboard storage is assumed not to be provided.
No analysis available
One remark explicitly states the building has "trash chutes," and the MLS amenity data is nearly universal for this feature. Given the very strong historical pattern, this is highly likely to be a real building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported by both historical MLS data and current listing remarks. At least 10+ remarks explicitly mention a 'swimming pool,' 'pool,' or 'community pool,' often paired with related shared amenities like recreation area, BBQ, and guest parking. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for indications that the pool is salt water, including terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', or 'saline', and found no matches. All references are to a standard swimming pool, so the pool is assumed not to be salt water based on available remarks.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported for Alexander Towers. Across the provided remarks, at least 4 listings explicitly mention "washer/dryer in the unit" or similar wording, and one notes washer-dryer is included. This aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS pattern showing washer/dryer in inclusions across nearly all listings, so the evidence is consistent and likely not copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Remarks were checked for any indication of paid community laundry, including terms like coin-op, card-operated, or paid laundry facilities, and none were mentioned. Listings instead reference in-unit washer/dryers with no payment system described. In the absence of evidence, paid community laundry is assumed not to be present.
Remarks were searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' or any shared laundry description, and none were found. Instead, listings emphasize in-unit washer/dryer, which suggests there may not be separate community laundry on every floor. Based on this absence, the feature is marked as not present.
Parking is clearly present across the building. The remarks mention it in many listings with phrases like “1 assigned parking stall,” “1 assigned covered parking,” “covered parking stall,” “parking stall in gated garage,” and “secured parking.” This is strong, repeated evidence across multiple agents, not a one-off copy-paste issue.
Assigned parking is consistently confirmed. Multiple remarks explicitly state “1 assigned parking stall,” “1 assigned covered parking stall,” “1 assigned parking with secured entrance,” and “one covered parking,” which indicates reserved stalls are part of the building offering. The evidence is broad and repeatedly reinforced across listings.
Covered parking is clearly present and repeatedly described in the remarks. At least several listings mention 'covered parking stall,' 'assigned covered parking,' or 'gated garage,' which aligns with the strong MLS pattern. This looks like a stable building feature rather than a one-off unit detail.
I searched for deeded/owned parking language such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and found none. The listings consistently describe the parking as assigned or covered, which does not indicate deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any explicit parking cost or monthly parking fee and found none. The listings mention assigned/covered parking and guest stalls, but they do not state that parking costs extra or provide a fee amount.
Guest parking is well supported. Several listings mention “guest stalls on site,” “guest parking,” and exact details such as “3 limited time parking stalls and 5 extended time parking stalls.” The repetition across listings makes this a strong building-level feature.
Secured entry for parking is clearly present. The remarks repeatedly describe “secure entry/parking,” “secure entrance to building and parking,” “secured parking,” and “parking stall in gated garage,” which is strong evidence that access is controlled. This appears consistently across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or similar wording and found none. The public remarks suggest parking is available with the unit and additional guest stalls exist, so there is no evidence of a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like key card, keycard entry, fob access, card reader, or electronic access and found none. While the building is described as secured, there is no explicit evidence that access is controlled by a card/fob system, so this feature is set to false based on current information.
No analysis available
I looked for any indication of a security patrol or roving security service and found no references in the listings. Given this absence in multiple detailed descriptions, it is likely the building does not have a dedicated security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited evidence that some units in the building have window air conditioning: 3 of 16 current MLS listings include ACWIUN. None of the provided public remarks explicitly say 'window AC,' 'window unit,' or 'wall AC,' so this may reflect MLS copy rather than consistently described building-wide features.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS record: 16 of 17 current listings list CONCRE in construction_materials. The remarks across many listings do not explicitly say “concrete,” but they are consistent with a mid/high-rise building and do not undermine the MLS data. This appears to be reliable, repeated MLS input rather than a one-off agent note.
There is no remark-based evidence for double-wall construction across the listings reviewed. Only 4 of 17 current MLS records check DOUWAL, which is too weak to support the feature, and the remarks focus on renovations, amenities, and location rather than construction type. This looks more like inconsistent MLS entry than a confirmed building characteristic.
Limited evidence for hollow tile: 2 of 9 current listings list HOLTIL in construction_materials, but the majority mark concrete and none of the public remarks mention hollow tile construction. This suggests hollow tile is either present in a small portion or results from inconsistent checkbox use by agents; included for buyers but flagged with moderate confidence.
Limited and weak evidence for masonry/stucco: only 2 of 10 current listings list MASSTU in construction_materials, and none of the public remarks contain phrases like 'masonry' or 'stucco'. Given the lack of supporting remarks and no historical support, the masonry/stucco attribute is likely incorrect and omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate/implied evidence for 'above ground' construction: 4 of 12 current MLS listings include construction_materials = 'ABOGRO'. Public remarks contain no references to above-ground construction; the presence in only a minority of listings and lack of descriptive remarks suggests inconsistent agent reporting or partial applicability, so the feature is included with moderate confidence.
Public remarks across the provided listings do not describe the building as brick, and there are no site-visit style comments confirming brick exterior or brick construction. The only support is a single MLS checkbox among 15 listings, which is too weak on its own and looks like a likely inconsistency in the MLS data.
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, TVU, NUC, vacation rental language, or explicit minimum-stay rules and found none. With no evidence that short-term rentals are permitted, the safest reading from the remarks is that STR is not supported.
I searched for hotel pool language such as hotel rental pool, hotel-managed program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar branding and found nothing. Because the remarks do not support short-term rentals, hotel-pool participation is also unsupported.
I looked for language indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool, such as required hotel program membership or inability to opt out, and found none. There is also no evidence of any rental pool program at all in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold terms such as a lease expiry year, ground lease end date, or renewal language like "extended to" or "renewed through" and found nothing. Since no lease expiration year is stated in the remarks, the expiry remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-related language and found none. Because VA approval is only determined from public remarks, there is no evidence to support that the building is VA approved.
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance language indicating the building is fully insured or has walls-in coverage. Nothing in the listings mentions full insurance coverage, so there is no evidence to support this feature. Since it is not stated, it is treated as unconfirmed.
Strong, repeated evidence confirms fire sprinklers at Alexander Towers. Multiple listings explicitly mention the feature across different agents and time periods, with about 8+ remarks using phrases such as "fire sprinkler systems," "fire sprinklers," and "sprinkler system." The consistency across listings suggests this is a real building feature, not just MLS copy-paste noise.
I looked for direct language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or life safety compliant. The remarks only reference safety systems like sprinklers and alarms, which is not the same as an evaluation pass. With no direct mention of a pass, I treat this as not confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are supported by both the current MLS data and multiple public remarks. One listing explicitly states "views of the city and mountains," which directly confirms mountain views for the building, and this is consistent with the broader MLS pattern rather than a one-off agent copy.
1 listing explicitly references a "partial Diamond Head view," which is strong direct evidence that some units in the building offer Diamond Head views. The remark appears as a specific unit description rather than generic copy-paste, making this a reliable building-level feature for search purposes.
City views are strongly supported across the building's listings. Multiple remarks explicitly reference city-facing views, including "views of the city and mountains" and "city views," and the current MLS data shows CITY in 12/17 listings, making this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks explicitly reference eastern exposure—"east tower" and "dining area faces east"—which implies sunrise views/morning sun for units with that orientation. Although MLS SUNRIS was not checked, multiple remarks provide direct evidence of eastern-facing units, so the feature is included.
None of the 11 current listings include SUNSET in their view descriptions (0/11). Remarks repeatedly note east-facing orientation (e.g., "dining area faces east", "on the east tower") and mention city/mountain views but contain no mentions of "sunset", "western exposure", or evening/west views. Given the absence of any sunset-related language across multiple listings and the MLS checkbox being unchecked, there is strong evidence the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from your lanai', or similar. The listings only mention city and mountain views, so there is no indication of a fireworks view from the building.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly indicate a resident/on-site manager is present. Remarks cite "onsite manager," "business hours site manager," and "daytime property manager," which is strong corroboration across separate listings. This appears to be a stable building-level amenity rather than a mistaken MLS checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.