Alexander Towers
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Alexander Towers
Building Overview
Alexander Towers in McCully-Moiliili (built 1979) - concrete construction with onsite pool; assigned covered parking. Based on MLS data.
About Alexander Towers
Alexander Towers is located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood and was built in 1979. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the building offers an onsite pool. No other common-area amenities are listed in the available records.
Additional details from MLS show covered, assigned parking plus guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS. Buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with listing agents or condo management, as this summary is based solely on MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
MLS floor fields and unit numbers agree through floor 15, including a penthouse listing at 1502. County and state records list 14 floors, consistent with a skipped floor 13.
The county assessor reports 90 residential units, and the state registration independently reports 90 units. The currently stored value of 90 is supported.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 864. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks confirm that the building has elevator access, including references to a unit near the elevator and parking near the elevators. No explicit elevator count such as "4 elevators" or "multiple elevators" is provided, so the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No listings in the current MLS data indicate that maintenance fees include central air conditioning. The remarks consistently list other inclusions only—water, sewer, basic cable TV, internet, and submetered electricity—and one mention of a "bedroom a/c" refers to an in-unit unit, not a building fee inclusion. This looks like a clear omission rather than a copy-paste pattern, so the feature should be corrected to false.
Three listings explicitly mention cable inclusion, using the phrases "basic cable tv" and "basic CATV." This aligns with CABTV appearing in 11 of 19 current MLS records and the previously high-confidence determination.
Common-area electricity appears moderately supported by the MLS pattern, with 11 of 18 listings checking OTCOEX. The public remarks mention electrical upgrades and submetered unit electricity, but they do not clearly confirm common-area electricity, so this remains a moderate-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
Several listings (multiple agent remarks) explicitly state 'electricity is sub-metered and charged back separately to the apartment owner' or 'electricity is submetered and billed with the maintenance fee but is in addition to the maintenance fee.' This is consistent across agents and strongly indicates unit electricity is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
Hot water appears to be included based on current MLS records, with 10 of 18 listings checking HOTWAT. The public remarks do not explicitly mention hot water, and there is no WTRHTR signal that would argue against it, so this is a moderate-confidence building-level feature.
Four listings explicitly mention internet being included in the maintenance fee, using nearly identical wording: "Maintenance fee includes water, sewer, basic cable tv, and internet." Although some remarks appear copied and pasted, the explicit remarks plus INTSER appearing in 10 of 20 current MLS records support inclusion.
There is no mention of marina, boat slips, or marina access in any public remarks, and only one MLS record lists MARINA. Given absence of corroborating remarks and minimal MLS usage, marina fees are not treated as included.
Four listings explicitly mention sewer as included in the maintenance fee. The repeated wording may be agent copy/paste, but it is consistent across multiple listings and is strongly confirmed by SEWER appearing in 20 of 20 current MLS records.
Four listings explicitly state that water is included in the maintenance fee, with repeated wording such as "Maintenance fee includes water, sewer, basic cable tv, and internet." Despite likely boilerplate repetition, the remarks and WATER appearing in 19 of 20 current MLS records provide strong building-level evidence.
The building is repeatedly described as having BBQ amenities across the listings, including explicit phrases like "BBQ facilities" and "BBQ area." This appears in multiple remarks from different listings and fits the existing high-confidence historical data, so it is strongly supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 7 current listings mention the feature, using phrases such as "car wash area" and "car washing area." The repeated descriptions across multiple listings and the 11/20 MLS amenity entries provide strong evidence that Alexander Towers offers a building car wash facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe patio/deck-style outdoor space, including an "enclosed 110 sq. ft. Patio" and several "enclosed lanai" / "nice lanai" remarks. Evidence appears across different listings and agents, so this looks like a real building/unit feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention a shared recreation amenity using several consistent phrases, including "recreation area," "recreational area," "recreational space," and "pool/party area." The repeated references across many remarks support this as a real building-level feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for terms such as 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', or combined 'bike and surfboard storage' and found none. Amenities listed include pool, recreational/party area, car wash area, bike rack, guest parking, BBQ, and on-site management, but nothing specific to surfboard storage. Based on the absence of any reference, surfboard storage is assumed not to be provided.
No analysis available
One current listing explicitly states that the building has "trash chutes," while 18 of 20 MLS records include the TRACHU amenity. Although the feature is rarely mentioned in public remarks, the strong current MLS consistency and prior high-confidence evidence support including it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool is strongly supported by current remarks across approximately 14 of 20 listings, including repeated descriptions of a “swimming pool,” “community pool,” and “pool/party area.” Although several remarks appear copied from common building descriptions, the feature is confirmed across multiple listing variants and is consistent with the 20/20 current MLS amenity records.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for indications that the pool is salt water, including terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', or 'saline', and found no matches. All references are to a standard swimming pool, so the pool is assumed not to be salt water based on available remarks.
At least 5 listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry using phrases such as “washer/dryer in the unit” and “washer and dryer in the unit.” The evidence is strong across multiple listings and is reinforced by the current MLS inclusion data showing washer/dryer in all 20 listings.
No analysis available
Remarks were checked for any indication of paid community laundry, including terms like coin-op, card-operated, or paid laundry facilities, and none were mentioned. Listings instead reference in-unit washer/dryers with no payment system described. In the absence of evidence, paid community laundry is assumed not to be present.
Remarks were searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' or any shared laundry description, and none were found. Instead, listings emphasize in-unit washer/dryer, which suggests there may not be separate community laundry on every floor. Based on this absence, the feature is marked as not present.
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building: all 20 current MLS listings identify some form of parking, and approximately 17 remarks explicitly mention covered, secured, garage, or guest parking. The repeated references across many listings and agents indicate a genuine building feature rather than isolated copy-paste data.
Assigned parking is consistently documented, with 16 of 20 current MLS listings marked ASSIGN and at least 10 remarks explicitly using phrases such as '1 assigned parking,' 'assigned parking stall,' or 'one assigned covered parking stall.' The evidence appears across numerous listings and confirms that the building offers assigned parking, in addition to guest parking.
Covered parking is clearly present and repeatedly described in the remarks. Several listings mention "covered parking stall," "assigned covered parking stall," "covered parking on the second floor," and "parking stall in gated garage," confirming the building offers covered parking options. The consistent wording across multiple listings supports a strong building-level feature.
The listings confirm that units have assigned or covered parking, such as "1 assigned parking" and "one covered parking." However, no remark states that the stall is deeded or included in the unit deed.
No analysis available
The remarks describe assigned, covered, secured, and guest parking but provide no monthly parking fee. The parking cost is therefore unknown.
Guest parking is well supported. Several listings mention “guest stalls on site,” “guest parking,” and exact details such as “3 limited time parking stalls and 5 extended time parking stalls.” The repetition across listings makes this a strong building-level feature.
Secured entry for parking/building access is repeatedly confirmed in the remarks. Listings mention "secured building," "secure entry/parking," "secure entrance to building and parking," and "secured, covered parking," showing this is a stable building feature rather than a checkbox artifact. Evidence appears across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe assigned parking and multiple guest stalls, including limited-time and extended-time spaces. None indicates that parking is subject to a waitlist.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like key card, keycard entry, fob access, card reader, or electronic access and found none. While the building is described as secured, there is no explicit evidence that access is controlled by a card/fob system, so this feature is set to false based on current information.
No analysis available
I looked for any indication of a security patrol or roving security service and found no references in the listings. Given this absence in multiple detailed descriptions, it is likely the building does not have a dedicated security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited evidence that some units in the building have window air conditioning: 3 of 16 current MLS listings include ACWIUN. None of the provided public remarks explicitly say 'window AC,' 'window unit,' or 'wall AC,' so this may reflect MLS copy rather than consistently described building-wide features.
Current MLS construction data identifies CONCRE in 19 of 20 listings, providing strong, consistent evidence that the building is concrete construction. Public remarks do not explicitly use the phrase “concrete construction,” but the repeated MLS designation across nearly all listings is compelling.
There is no remark-based evidence for double-wall construction across the listings reviewed. Only 4 of 17 current MLS records check DOUWAL, which is too weak to support the feature, and the remarks focus on renovations, amenities, and location rather than construction type. This looks more like inconsistent MLS entry than a confirmed building characteristic.
Limited evidence for hollow tile: 2 of 9 current listings list HOLTIL in construction_materials, but the majority mark concrete and none of the public remarks mention hollow tile construction. This suggests hollow tile is either present in a small portion or results from inconsistent checkbox use by agents; included for buyers but flagged with moderate confidence.
Limited and weak evidence for masonry/stucco: only 2 of 10 current listings list MASSTU in construction_materials, and none of the public remarks contain phrases like 'masonry' or 'stucco'. Given the lack of supporting remarks and no historical support, the masonry/stucco attribute is likely incorrect and omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is moderate evidence for above-ground construction. 5 of 18 current listings include ABOGRO in construction_materials, and the remarks repeatedly describe the property as a 15-story/high-rise tower, which supports the classification indirectly. The evidence is not explicit enough to be high confidence, but it is consistent across multiple listings rather than appearing as a single copy-paste anomaly.
Two of 20 current listings identify BRICK in the construction materials, while no provided remarks mention “brick exterior,” “brick construction,” or “brick-and-mortar.” The limited current MLS support is weaker than for concrete, but the prior high-confidence record supports retaining the feature rather than correcting it to false.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for short-term rental, vacation rental, STR, NUC, TVU, and minimum-stay language. No public statement establishes short-term rental permission, so it is not treated as allowed.
The listings contain no references to a hotel rental pool, hotel rental program, or hotel management. Because short-term rental permission is not established, hotel-pool participation is false.
The remarks do not state that owners must participate in a rental program or hotel pool. Since short-term rental eligibility is not established, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for leasehold terms and specific expiration or renewal years. No applicable lease-expiry year was provided.
The remarks were searched for explicit VA-related financing language, including "VA approved" and "VA financing." None was found, so VA approval is not established.
I searched the remarks for terms indicating that the HOA is fully insured or provides walls-in coverage. No such insurance language was found, so full HOA insurance cannot be confirmed.
At least 10 current listing remarks explicitly mention the feature, including "fire sprinkler systems," "fire sprinklers and smoke detectors," and "equipped with a sprinkler system." The repeated confirmations across multiple agents, together with 12/20 MLS listings marked FIRSPR and the prior high-confidence history, provide strong evidence that Alexander Towers has fire sprinklers.
The listings provide evidence of fire and life-safety equipment, including sprinklers, alarms, and smoke detectors. However, no remarks explicitly say FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection; therefore, there is no evidence to confirm this specific status.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are supported by both the current MLS data and multiple public remarks. One listing explicitly states "views of the city and mountains," which directly confirms mountain views for the building, and this is consistent with the broader MLS pattern rather than a one-off agent copy.
1 listing explicitly references a "partial Diamond Head view," which is strong direct evidence that some units in the building offer Diamond Head views. The remark appears as a specific unit description rather than generic copy-paste, making this a reliable building-level feature for search purposes.
City views are strongly supported across the building, with 15 of 20 current listings identifying CITY views. Multiple independent remarks explicitly reference "pleasant city views," "views of the city and mountains," and "city views," confirming this is a legitimate building-level feature rather than a single listing's copy-paste claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks explicitly reference eastern exposure—"east tower" and "dining area faces east"—which implies sunrise views/morning sun for units with that orientation. Although MLS SUNRIS was not checked, multiple remarks provide direct evidence of eastern-facing units, so the feature is included.
None of the 11 current listings include SUNSET in their view descriptions (0/11). Remarks repeatedly note east-facing orientation (e.g., "dining area faces east", "on the east tower") and mention city/mountain views but contain no mentions of "sunset", "western exposure", or evening/west views. Given the absence of any sunset-related language across multiple listings and the MLS checkbox being unchecked, there is strong evidence the building does not offer sunset views.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from your lanai', or similar. The listings only mention city and mountain views, so there is no indication of a fireworks view from the building.
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly indicate a resident/on-site manager is present. Remarks cite "onsite manager," "business hours site manager," and "daytime property manager," which is strong corroboration across separate listings. This appears to be a stable building-level amenity rather than a mistaken MLS checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.