Alexander Towers
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Alexander Towers
Building Overview
Alexander Towers in McCully-Moiliili (built 1979) - concrete construction with onsite pool; assigned covered parking. Based on MLS data.
About Alexander Towers
Alexander Towers is located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood and was built in 1979. According to available records the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the building offers an onsite pool. No other common-area amenities are listed in the available records.
Additional details from MLS show covered, assigned parking plus guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS. Buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with listing agents or condo management, as this summary is based solely on MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit owner-occupancy statements or percentages and common phrases indicating high owner-occupancy. There is no direct information about percentage of owner-occupied units in the building, so the value is unknown and not inferred.
I searched the public remarks for explicit counts or written numbers (e.g., '4 elevators', 'four elevators', 'multiple elevators'). While the remarks clearly reference 'the elevators' and the unit's proximity to them, there is no explicit elevator count. Per rules, I will not guess a numeric value without explicit evidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Explicit language in the public remarks states "Maintenance fee includes ... basic CATV," and CABTV is checked in about 5 of 10 current MLS records. Evidence is strong across MLS entries and is directly confirmed in agent remarks (likely not a copy-paste error).
Multiple remarks explicitly indicate electricity is sub-metered and charged back to unit owners, not included in the maintenance fee. Although some MLS checkboxes (OTCOEX in 4/10) show common electric, the agent remarks clearly state it is billed/charged back to owners, so common electric should be considered not included.
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly say 'Electricity is sub-metered and charged back' or 'electricity is submetered and billed ... in addition to the maintenance fee,' indicating building electricity is not included in the maintenance fee. This is corroborated by MLS checkbox usage and agent remarks across listings.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data shows HOTWAT checked in roughly 6 of 10 current listings, suggesting hot water is included in many units' maintenance fees. Public remarks do not mention hot water explicitly, so inclusion is implied by MLS fields rather than confirmed in agent text.
Agent remarks explicitly list internet as included: "Maintenance fee includes water, sewer, basic CATV, and internet." INTSER is also checked in multiple MLS records, providing strong, direct evidence that internet is included.
There is no mention of marina, boat slips, or marina access in any public remarks, and only one MLS record lists MARINA. Given absence of corroborating remarks and minimal MLS usage, marina fees are not treated as included.
Sewer is explicitly listed in the remarks ("Maintenance fee includes ... sewer") and all current MLS entries have SEWER checked (10/10), giving very strong and consistent evidence that sewer is included in the maintenance fee.
Water is explicitly mentioned in the public remarks ("Maintenance fee includes water, sewer, basic CATV, and internet") and is checked in the vast majority of MLS records (about 9 of 10). Multiple agent entries consistently confirm water is included.
One of the public remarks explicitly lists a 'community pool, BBQ area and guest parking.' CURRENT MLS indicates 3/9 listings have BBQ checked (no prior confidence data). Evidence is limited but present across multiple listings/agents, so include the feature with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash is mentioned explicitly in many of the concatenated remarks (at least 5–7 listings) with phrases like 'car wash area' and 'car washing area'. Current MLS checkbox prevalence (7/10) and repeated agent remarks provide strong, corroborating evidence that the building offers a car wash facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings' remarks (at least 3–4 of the concatenated listings) explicitly list a recreation/amenity deck or 'recreational space' — e.g., 'recreational space', 'recreational area'. Current MLS checkboxes also include RECARE in 2/10 listings. The evidence from agent remarks is consistent enough to include the building-level recreation area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched all remarks for terms such as 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', or combined 'bike and surfboard storage' and found none. Amenities listed include pool, recreational/party area, car wash area, bike rack, guest parking, BBQ, and on-site management, but nothing specific to surfboard storage. Based on the absence of any reference, surfboard storage is assumed not to be provided.
No analysis available
Trash chute is strongly supported: historical MLS confidence is high (TRACHU in 9/10), and the public remarks explicitly state 'trash chutes' (e.g., 'there is an onsite manager, trash chutes, fire sprinklers, and smoke detectors'). Multiple agents' remarks and high checkbox prevalence indicate the building has trash chutes.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a shared swimming pool: MLS amenity checkbox is set on all current listings (10/10) and multiple agent remarks explicitly state "swimming pool", "community pool", or "swimming pool/party area." Mentions appear across listings from different agents and are consistent rather than isolated or contradictory.
No analysis available
I searched all public remarks for indications that the pool is salt water, including terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', or 'saline', and found no matches. All references are to a standard swimming pool, so the pool is assumed not to be salt water based on available remarks.
Strong evidence that some units offer in-unit laundry: at least five listing remarks explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit (examples: "washer/ dryer in the unit", "washer-dryer and refrigerator... included", "new appliances including... washer and dryer"). This is consistent across multiple agent remarks and matches prior high-confidence MLS inclusions, so the building should be listed as offering in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
Remarks were checked for any indication of paid community laundry, including terms like coin-op, card-operated, or paid laundry facilities, and none were mentioned. Listings instead reference in-unit washer/dryers with no payment system described. In the absence of evidence, paid community laundry is assumed not to be present.
Remarks were searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' or any shared laundry description, and none were found. Instead, listings emphasize in-unit washer/dryer, which suggests there may not be separate community laundry on every floor. Based on this absence, the feature is marked as not present.
No analysis available
At least several listings explicitly state assigned or reserved stalls, including 'one assigned covered parking stall' and references to a 'parking stall in gated garage.' Historical MLS checkbox data (8/9) also strongly indicates assigned parking across the building, and the remarks are consistent across multiple agents.
Strong, consistent evidence across listings that the building offers covered parking: 8 of 10 current listings (per MLS) and multiple remarks state phrases like '1 covered parking stall', 'one assigned covered parking stall', and 'parking stall in gated garage'. This is corroborated across different agent remarks rather than a single isolated listing, indicating the building does provide covered parking stalls/garage spaces.
I looked for explicit wording such as 'deeded parking', 'owned parking', or 'parking included in deed'. The listings describe assigned/covered/secured parking stalls and guest parking, but do not indicate the stall is deeded, so there is no evidence in the remarks that parking is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or 'additional parking cost'. The remarks only reference assigned and guest parking stalls and do not mention any recurring parking fee, so the presence or amount of a parking fee is not stated.
Guest parking is mentioned across several listings with consistent specifics (e.g., '3 limited time parking stalls and 5 extended time parking stalls' and 'multiple guest parking'), and MLS checkbox history (5/9) corroborates the presence of guest parking.
Several remarks reference security features related to parking—'gated garage', 'partial covered secured parking', plus mentions that the building is 'secured'—and historical MLS entries (6/9) list secured entry for parking, indicating building parking has controlled/gated access.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for language indicating a parking waitlist system (e.g., 'parking waitlist', 'join waitlist for parking'). The remarks discuss assigned and guest stalls and availability but do not mention a waitlist, so there is no evidence of a parking waitlist in the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like key card, keycard entry, fob access, card reader, or electronic access and found none. While the building is described as secured, there is no explicit evidence that access is controlled by a card/fob system, so this feature is set to false based on current information.
No analysis available
I looked for any indication of a security patrol or roving security service and found no references in the listings. Given this absence in multiple detailed descriptions, it is likely the building does not have a dedicated security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for concrete construction: 10 of 10 current listings include CONCRE in construction_materials and historical MLS data was highly consistent. Public remarks do not explicitly state construction type but contain no contradictions; multiple agents consistently checked the concrete box, indicating the building is a concrete structure.
No analysis available
Limited evidence for hollow tile: 2 of 9 current listings list HOLTIL in construction_materials, but the majority mark concrete and none of the public remarks mention hollow tile construction. This suggests hollow tile is either present in a small portion or results from inconsistent checkbox use by agents; included for buyers but flagged with moderate confidence.
Limited and weak evidence for masonry/stucco: only 2 of 10 current listings list MASSTU in construction_materials, and none of the public remarks contain phrases like 'masonry' or 'stucco'. Given the lack of supporting remarks and no historical support, the masonry/stucco attribute is likely incorrect and omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mixed evidence for 'above ground' construction: 3 of 9 current listings include ABOGRO, but historical records show it only in a minority of listings and no public remarks describe 'above ground' materials. The checkbox presence across a few listings warrants including it as a possible building attribute for searchers, but confidence is moderate due to lack of corroborating remarks and inconsistent agent reporting.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit short-term rental language or minimum stay restrictions (e.g., 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental allowed', '30-day minimum'). The remarks do not specify STR policy, so based on the absence of any STR authorization language, STR is not supported by the public remarks.
I searched for phrases like 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or references to hotel-managed rentals. There is no such language in the remarks, and because STR is not indicated, there is no evidence of hotel-pool participation.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation in a hotel or rental pool (e.g., 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate'). The remarks include no references to any rental pool or mandatory program; therefore mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language and explicit lease expiry years (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'land lease to 2065', 'renewed through 2075'). The remarks make no mention of land tenure being leasehold or any lease expiry year, so the lease expiry year is unknown from these remarks.
I searched the provided public remarks for terms indicating VA loan approval (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted'). There are no references to VA eligibility or VA financing in any of the remarks, so VA approval is not supported by the public remarks.
I looked for explicit insurance coverage language (e.g., 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage'). The remarks describe maintenance fee inclusions (water, sewer, basic CATV, internet) but make no claims about the HOA providing full or walls‑in insurance. Given the lack of explicit mention, returned false with medium confidence.
Multiple listing remarks (at least 4–5 segments) reference building sprinklers — phrases include 'sprinkler leak within the apartment', 'sprinkler system', and 'fire sprinkler systems'. This matches prior High-confidence historical data and appears consistently across listings (possible agent copy/paste, but repeated direct mentions indicate the building has a sprinkler system).
I searched for explicit phrases such as 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', or 'passed fire inspection'. The remarks describe fire sprinklers, smoke detectors, and an audible alarm, but do not explicitly state that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation. Absence of explicit FLSE language leads to a conservative 'false' with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple public remarks explicitly state "views of the city and mountains" and "city and mountains" (appearing across several listings), indicating the building offers mountain (mauka/Koolau) views. Evidence is explicit across different listings and agents rather than a single copy/paste, so confidence is high.
MLS checkbox shows Diamond Head (DIAHEA) in 1 listing, but none of the public remarks reference Diamond Head (0 listings mention 'Diamond Head' or 'DH view'). Because the feature appears only in a small number of MLS checkboxes and is not described in agent remarks, this is treated as implied (some units may have the view) rather than strongly confirmed.
City views are repeatedly noted in the public remarks (quotes include 'large 110 square foot lanai with views of the city and mountains' and 'Nice lanai with city views'), with at least 3–4 listings mentioning city views and 4/10 MLS view checkboxes marked CITY. Evidence is strong across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks explicitly reference eastern exposure—"east tower" and "dining area faces east"—which implies sunrise views/morning sun for units with that orientation. Although MLS SUNRIS was not checked, multiple remarks provide direct evidence of eastern-facing units, so the feature is included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases such as 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from your lanai', or similar. The listings only mention city and mountain views, so there is no indication of a fireworks view from the building.
No analysis available
Multiple listings (at least 3–4 segments) explicitly note a manager on site with phrases like 'onsite manager', 'business hours site manager', and 'daytime property manager'. These consistent, repeated mentions align with prior high-confidence data indicating the building has a resident/on-site manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.