Alana at Hoopili
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Alana at Hoopili
Building Overview
Alana at Hoopili in Ewa (2025) — steel/wood frame building with a pool and split A/C; covered, assigned parking. Based on MLS data.
About Alana at Hoopili
Based on MLS data, Alana at Hoopili is a residential building in the Ewa neighborhood completed in 2025. Construction types listed are steel frame and wood frame. Size details (unit count, unit sizes, or number of floors) are not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the building offers a pool and units use split air conditioning systems. No short-term rentals are allowed and pets are not permitted, per the MLS data provided.
Parking is listed as available, covered, and assigned. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS information. Buyers should verify all building details, policies, and fees with the listing agent or property management before making any decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the listings, there are no public remarks indicating that maintenance fees include hot water. The MLS pattern is consistent: 0/20 mention HOTWAT, while 20/20 include WTRHTR, which is a strong sign the building does not provide hot water through the fee. This looks like consistent copy-paste marketing text with no contrary evidence, so the feature should be marked false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, there are no references to BBQ, barbecue, grills, or grilling areas. With only 2 of 20 current MLS entries checked and no supporting remarks, this looks like unverified checkbox data rather than a confirmed building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the public remarks describe a clubhouse or similar shared community space. Because just 2 of 20 current listings have the checkbox and the remarks are silent, the amenity appears unconfirmed and likely inconsistent MLS input.
No analysis available
Dog-park/pet-area evidence is strong across this building, with 19 of 20 current listings showing DGPRK in MLS amenities. The public remarks are mostly silent on a shared dog park, but several mention pet-friendly outdoor space such as 'private fenced yard area,' 'private yard,' and 'small private yard,' which is consistent with a pet area amenity. Overall this looks like a building-level feature that agents are likely carrying through consistently rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no textual evidence in the remarks for a jogging or walking path, and the feature is only lightly represented in current MLS checkbox data (6 of 20). Because the remarks are otherwise heavily repetitive and copy-pasted, the checkbox appears unreliable here and does not support including the amenity.
No analysis available
Private yard space is strongly supported across the listing remarks, with multiple units describing it directly. At least 3 distinct phrasing patterns appear: "your own private yard area complete with irrigated planter box," "private fenced yard area," and "small private yard" / "private yard." This looks like a real building feature rather than a checkbox error, since the remarks repeatedly and consistently advertise it across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported at the building level. All 20 of 20 current MLS listings include pool-related amenities, while the public remarks are silent on the feature. This looks like consistent MLS amenity data rather than copy-paste noise, so the building should be treated as having a pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported. Across the provided remarks, every sampled listing references 'washer/dryer' or similar language such as 'modern appliances including ... washer/dryer,' and the historical MLS data shows 20/20 listings including it. The evidence is consistent across multiple floor plans and agents, so this feature should remain included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported for this building. Across the listings, parking is explicitly mentioned many times in remarks, most commonly as a 'single-car garage,' with some units also described as having an additional uncovered/open stall. The current MLS data is fully consistent with the remarks, so this appears to be a reliable building-level feature rather than copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the building. Many listings explicitly mention a "single-car garage," and several add reserved-style details such as "1 open parking," "one additional uncovered stall," or an "open stall." The evidence appears consistent across multiple remarks and listing types, not just a one-off agent checkbox.
Multiple listings (at least 10) explicitly note an attached 'single-car garage', and MLS flags confirm garage/covered parking for several units. This consistent evidence across different floorplans and listings shows that the building offers covered parking (via garages) as an available feature.
I searched for wording like "deeded parking," "owned stall," and "parking included in deed." The remarks only describe garages, open stalls, and uncovered parking, which is not enough to confirm deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit parking cost language such as "parking fee," "monthly parking charge," or "parking rental." The remarks mention parking availability, but no separate fee is provided.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited evidence for tandem parking: only 1 of 20 current MLS records checks TANDEM, and none of the public remarks call out tandem or back-to-back parking. This may be a unit-specific or copied MLS entry rather than a building-wide feature, so confidence is only moderate-low.
No analysis available
I searched for terms like "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," and "join a waitlist for parking." The remarks discuss garages and stalls, but not any queue or waitlist process.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is strongly confirmed for this building. It is explicitly mentioned in the remarks dozens of times with the exact phrase 'Split air conditioning,' and the current MLS data shows ACSPL in inclusions for all 20 of 20 listings. The evidence is consistent across multiple unit types and appears to be standard building-wide copy rather than a one-off mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Steel-frame construction is also strongly supported by the MLS data, with 20/20 listings marked STEFRA. The public remarks do not mention construction materials, so there is no textual evidence to override the MLS checkbox data. The repeated unit remarks suggest copy-paste listing content, but the building-level MLS material flag is consistently present.
One of 20 current MLS listings flags SLAB in the construction_materials field, while the rest are silent rather than explicitly stating a different foundation type. Given the project’s new, low-rise condominium/townhome design where slab foundations are typical, this lone positive checkbox is treated as implying slab construction, but with only moderate confidence due to limited supporting evidence.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 20/20 listings marked WOOFRA. The public remarks across the listings are repetitive unit descriptions and do not explicitly discuss construction, so there is no conflicting evidence. This appears to be a building-level MLS attribute consistently applied across many listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases indicating short-term rentals are allowed, including "STR permitted," "vacation rental allowed," "NUC," or "TVU," and found none. The remarks also do not suggest any exception or rental-rights language, so STR allowance is not supported.
I searched for hotel rental pool, hotel program, branded pool, or managed-by-hotel references and found none. Because there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must be false as well.
I looked for terms like mandatory hotel pool, required participation, cannot opt out, or must rent through a program. The remarks contain no such language, and since STR is not evidenced as allowed, mandatory pool participation is also false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for ground lease language such as "lease expires," "leasehold expiring," "ground lease ends," and any 4-digit expiry year. Nothing in the remarks identifies a leasehold tenure or a lease expiry date.
I searched the remarks for phrases like "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found none. The listings focus on floor plans, finishes, and parking, but do not mention loan eligibility.
No analysis available
Fire sprinklers appear to be present in the building. MLS history shows FIRSPR enabled in 19 of 20 recent listings, which is very strong building-level evidence and likely not just a one-off copy-paste error. Current remarks across many listings do not mention fire sprinklers directly, but there is no contrary evidence suggesting the feature was removed.
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence from the current listing set that this building has sunset views. Across 20/20 MLS view descriptions, none mention SUNSET and the public remarks do not reference sunset, western exposure, or evening sun. The absence appears consistent across many repeated, likely copy-pasted listings rather than a one-off omission.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.