Ala Wailani

MLS property data is unanimous (13/13 listings) that the building was built in 1969. No listing remarks contradict this or claim a different construction or completion year.

Multiple listings reference upper-floor units including a 'top-floor corner end unit' and a 'Penthouse', while MLS floor data for 13 listings goes up to the 12th floor and no higher. This strongly supports a 12-story building height.

No remarks mention the total number of units (e.g., 'XX-unit building'), and MLS summary data does not provide a reliable count. As a result, the total number of units in the building cannot be determined from the available information.

I searched the public remarks for owner-occupancy percentages or descriptive language like "owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," and found no references. With no evidence in the remarks, the current value is retained.

I searched the remarks for explicit elevator references such as the number of elevators, "elevator," "lift," or phrases like "multiple elevators," and found none. With no remark evidence to confirm or deny the current count, the current value is retained.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Public remarks discuss trade winds and breezes but never mention central air conditioning or AC included in fees. MLS data has 0/13 listings with ACCEN checked, indicating central AC is not part of the maintenance fee.

No public remarks reference cable TV being included in the fees. MLS data shows 0/13 listings with the CABTV (cable included) checkbox selected, suggesting cable is paid separately by owners.

Eight of 19 current listings include OTCOEX in the association fee inclusions. The public remarks are silent on common-area power, so this is driven mainly by MLS pattern evidence rather than explicit agent descriptions. Still, the recurring MLS checkbox across multiple listings supports that common area electricity is included.

No remarks mention co-op taxes, and the building is repeatedly described as a condo with VA approval. MLS data shows 0/13 listings with cooperative taxes included, so coop taxes are not part of the fees.

Public remarks focus on views, parking, and laundry, but never claim electricity is included. With 0/13 MLS entries checking ELECTR, electricity is almost certainly paid separately by residents.

There is no reference in remarks to gas utilities or gas stoves being covered by maintenance. MLS data has 0/13 listings with GAS selected, so gas is not included in the maintenance fee.

Hot water appears in 12 of 19 current MLS listings via HOTWAT, making it the dominant pattern. The remarks do not specifically discuss hot water, but the majority signal is strong and consistent enough to include it. A few listings show WTRHTR instead, so this is not perfectly unanimous, but the balance still favors inclusion.

Internet inclusion is rare in the current MLS set, with only 2 of 19 listings showing INTSER. None of the public remarks mention internet or Wi‑Fi, which supports the idea that the checkbox is likely inconsistent or agent-specific rather than a real building feature. This is strong enough to treat internet as not included.

All marketing focuses on beaches, the Ala Wai Canal, and nearby parks, without any mention of marina facilities or boat slips. With no MARINA checkmarks across 13 listings, marina-related costs are not part of the maintenance fees.

Sewer is included across the building according to the current MLS data, with 19 of 19 listings showing SEWER. The public remarks do not call it out, but the unanimity in MLS makes this a very strong building-level feature. This is the kind of inclusion that appears to be consistently carried across listings rather than a one-off agent typo.

Water is included in 18 of 19 current MLS listings, making it a near-universal feature of the building. Public remarks do not mention water service, but the MLS evidence is consistent across listings and strongly suggests this is part of the association fees. The single missing listing is likely an omission or data inconsistency rather than a true building exception.

Agents highlight features like guest parking, community laundry, and surfboard/bike storage, but do not mention any BBQ or grill facilities. Together with 0/13 MLS BBQ checkboxes, this strongly indicates there is no building BBQ amenity.

At least two separate listings list 'surfboard and bike storage' as part of the building amenities, in the same context as guest parking and community laundry. Because this is clearly a shared amenity mentioned by multiple agents, bike storage is confidently included as a building feature.

Views of the Ala Wai Canal and Golf Course are mentioned without any suggestion of mooring or dock facilities. This strongly indicates the property does not have a boat dock or marina access.

Remarks describe covered and secured parking but not any washing facility. The combined lack of textual and MLS evidence indicates there is no car wash amenity.

All remarks describe this as a boutique building with basic services, not a complex with its own clubhouse. The absence in both MLS amenities and text implies there is no clubhouse.

Across many listings, the building is presented as a self-service, boutique condo with no mention of concierge or front desk services. The complete lack of concierge-related terms, despite extensive marketing language, shows that concierge service is not offered.

Listings talk about nearby parks and beaches but not any dedicated pet area on-site. Given 0/13 MLS checks, the building appears not to have a dog park.

Agents describe the property as a “boutique building” with guest parking, community laundry, and secured/gated parking but never mention a doorman or lobby attendant. In a market where such services are heavily marketed when present, their total absence in all remarks indicates there is no doorman service.

Across all provided remarks, agents describe parking, security, community laundry, and storage but never an exercise room or gym. With 0/13 MLS amenities indicating EXEROO and no textual references, it is very likely this building does not offer an exercise room.

Listings present this as a boutique condo with basic amenities, not a full-service luxury tower. The absence of any reference to car or limo service means this amenity does not exist.

Listings do not promote any business center or meeting room space. With no MLS or narrative support, the building likely does not offer a meeting room.

Multiple independent listings describe lanais as a regular feature of the units (e.g., 'large lanai', 'covered lanai', 'enclosed lanai'). This strongly indicates the building offers lanai/patio-style outdoor space as a standard element, not just a one-off penthouse feature.

While the neighborhood offers places to jog, listings do not describe a dedicated jogging or walking path as a building amenity. Combined with MLS data, this indicates no building jogging path.

Agents only reference nearby public recreational spaces, not a children's play area within the building. This, plus the MLS data, indicates there is no building playground.

All remarks describe a typical Waikiki condo with lanais rather than ground-level yard areas. With no references to yards and no MLS indication of private yard amenities, it is very likely the building does not offer private yard space.

Remarks reference the Ala Wai Golf Course nearby but not any practice putting green on the property. The absence in all data suggests there is no putting green.

Agents do not describe any shared recreation deck or amenity space at the building, only nearby parks and beaches. Combined with MLS data, this suggests the building lacks a formal recreation area.

The remarks focus on unit interiors and basic building services without any reference to a rec room or game room. With 0/13 MLS indications, it is likely there is no shared recreation room.

Agents emphasize nearby dining options rather than any in-building restaurant. With no MLS indication, the building does not appear to host a restaurant.

Remarks never reference a rooftop deck, rooftop terrace, or rooftop access as a shared amenity. The lack of both MLS and textual evidence supports that there is no common rooftop feature.

All marketing focuses on views, location, and basic services, with no reference to a sauna. The MLS and narrative silence indicates the building does not have a sauna.

No listings explicitly advertise building storage units or lockers, and MLS data shows 0 of 13 listings with storage/extra storage amenities checked. The lone reference to 'room for storage' appears to describe open space by a parking stall, not a dedicated storage facility, so this feature is treated as not present.

The remarks directly and repeatedly confirm surfboard storage. This is strong, explicit evidence that the building offers surfboard storage facilities.

Multiple listings emphasize proximity to Ala Wai Golf Course and Kapiolani Park but do not mention any on-site tennis courts. The complete absence in both MLS amenities and remarks supports that the building does not have tennis courts.

Trash chute appears to be a confirmed building amenity. The MLS data is unanimous across 19/19 listings with TRACHU checked, and there are no remarks suggesting the feature was removed or is incorrect. Because this is consistent across all listings, it looks like reliable copy-paste MLS data rather than a one-off agent error.

Parking is consistently described as assigned, covered, and in a gated garage, with guest parking but no hint of valet service. The combination of detailed parking descriptions and total absence of 'valet' language strongly indicates there is no valet service at this building.

Several listings from different agents highlight physical gating around the parking/garage: phrases include “gated covered parking area,” “A gated entry secures the covered parking stall,” and “Secured entrance into the building and parking garage.” This consistent description of gated/secured parking indicates the property has a physical gate or barrier, qualifying as perimeter wall/fence-style security for vehicle access.

Agents do not reference any spa or hot tub facility among building amenities. Together with the MLS data, this suggests there is no whirlpool amenity.

0 of 13 listings describe any kind of pool, and agents instead highlight amenities like guest parking, community laundry, and surfboard/bike storage. In a Waikiki building, a pool would almost certainly be advertised if present, so current evidence strongly indicates the building does not have a pool.

Because no pool is mentioned or indicated in MLS data, a heated pool is effectively ruled out. 0 of 13 listings refer to a heated pool or any warming feature, confirming that this amenity is not offered.

I searched for salt water pool, saltwater pool, saline pool, and similar wording, but found no pool references at all. With no pool mentioned, there is no evidence to support this feature.

Across 13 listings, none mention in-unit washers or dryers, while many specifically reference laundry as a shared building facility (e.g., 'coin-operated washer/dryer in the building,' 'on-site laundry facilities'). Combined with 0/13 MLS inclusions for washer/dryer, this strongly indicates that units in this building generally do not have in-unit laundry. Given the repeated emphasis on community/coin-operated laundry and the complete absence of in-unit references, this feature is marked as not present.

Community laundry is strongly supported across the building’s listings. Multiple remarks from different listings explicitly mention "on-site laundry facilities," "coin-operated laundry facilities," "community laundry is in the building," and "laundry on the lower level," indicating this is a shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly. The evidence is consistent across many listings and agents, so confidence is very high.

The public remarks clearly confirm paid community laundry. Multiple listings use explicit coin-operated language, which is strong evidence that laundry requires payment.

I searched for wording like laundry on each floor, every floor, or floor-by-floor laundry and found none. The listings only reference shared laundry in the building or on the lower/lower-level area, which does not support every-floor laundry.

Strong evidence building provides on-site parking: all 15 MLS records include parking features and many remarks state 'covered parking', 'parking stall' or 'parking garage'. Multiple agent remarks across listings consistently reference parking, so inclusion is well-supported.

Assigned/reserved parking is strongly confirmed across many listings. Multiple remarks explicitly use phrases like 'one covered assigned parking,' 'covered assigned parking,' and 'assigned parking stall,' which appears consistent across different agents rather than a one-off copy-paste. Confidence is very high.

Covered parking is very well supported by the remarks and MLS history. Listings repeatedly reference 'covered parking,' 'one covered parking,' and a 'secured parking garage,' confirming this is a building-level amenity. Evidence is strong across multiple listings.

I looked for deeded/owned parking language such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The listings consistently describe parking as assigned, covered, designated, or included, which is not the same as deeded parking.

There is no MLS indication or remark evidence of EV charging stations. Given multiple detailed amenity descriptions across listings, EV charging would likely be mentioned if present, so it is treated as not available.

I searched for any monthly parking charge, parking rental, or added parking cost. The remarks only say parking is covered, assigned, or included, with no separate fee stated.

Guest parking is confirmed in multiple remarks across the dataset. Several listings directly state 'guest parking available' or note guest spots on-site, which aligns with the historical MLS data. This appears to be a real building feature, not just isolated agent wording.

Secured parking/entry is strongly confirmed by both MLS history and current remarks. Multiple listings describe a 'secured parking garage,' 'secured entrance,' or 'gated entry,' indicating controlled access to parking and/or the building. The consistency across listings makes this a highly reliable feature.

Stalls are described as individual covered or assigned spaces, not tandem. The complete absence of tandem mentions in both MLS data and remarks indicates tandem parking is not a building feature.

Parking appears to be self-park in a secured garage, with no reference to valet services. Given the consistent omission in both checkboxes and remarks, valet parking is not offered at this building.

I looked for parking waitlist language such as join a waitlist or parking waiting list. Nothing in the listings suggests a waitlist system for parking.

Listings reference “Secured bldg. entrance” and “secured entrance into the building and parking garage” but never mention any elevator security such as key or fob access. Given how often security is marketed in these remarks, the lack of any elevator-specific security language indicates there is no keyed/fob elevator system.

I looked for key card access, fob access, card reader, and keycard entry terms and found none. The building is described as secured, but the remarks do not specify a card/fob access system.

Multiple listings describe security in terms of “secured bldg. entrance,” “secured parking garage,” and “gated entry,” but none reference a security guard or on-site security personnel. Given that agents highlight other security features, the consistent absence of any guard-related language across all remarks strongly indicates there is no staffed guard service.

I searched for explicit patrol language and found nothing. The remarks only describe secured access and parking, which is not the same as an active security patrol service.

Remarks focus on physical security—“secured parking garage,” “secured bldg. entrance,” and “gated entry secures the covered parking stall”—without any mention of security cameras or video surveillance. The consistent omission of video-related terms across many listings, while other security is emphasized, suggests the building does not have a notable video security system.

Across all provided remarks, no listing mentions central air, HVAC, or forced air, despite central AC being a major selling point if present. Multiple listings instead highlight "cool breezes," "fresh island air," and tradewinds for comfort. Combined with 0/13 MLS checkboxes for central AC, this strongly supports that the building does not offer central air conditioning.

There are no references in any remarks to split systems, mini-splits, or ductless AC, and the cooling described relies on natural airflow and breezes. With 0/13 MLS listings marking split AC and no textual support, it is very likely that units in this building do not have split AC systems as a notable feature.

Only 1 of 13 listings marks window AC in the inclusions, with zero supporting mentions in the remarks (no "window AC" or "window unit" language). Several different agents describe cooling solely via tradewinds, cross-breezes, and a ceiling fan, which, together with the isolated checkbox, indicates the building is best characterized as not offering window AC as a notable feature.

Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS history: 19/19 current listings list CONCRE. None of the public remarks mention a different construction material, and the consistency across many listings suggests this is not a copy-paste anomaly.

Double wall construction appears in a minority of current listings (6 of 17), but none of the public remarks explicitly confirm it with phrases like 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' Because the checkbox is used by some agents without corroborating remarks, this may reflect inconsistent MLS entry rather than a fully verified building feature.

Two of 14 current listings have the HOLTIL checkbox selected, but none of the public remarks mention hollow tile construction. This sparse, inconsistent MLS checkbox evidence (and lack of narrative confirmation) suggests some listings may reference hollow tile for certain units or reflect agent data variance; therefore hollow tile is included with moderate confidence.

0 out of 13 listings mark masonry/stucco, and agents instead consistently code concrete construction. With no textual mentions of stucco or masonry walls, masonry-stucco construction is very unlikely here.

There are no MLS indications (0/13) of steel frame construction, and all listings instead specify concrete. Given local construction norms for this type of building, steel frame construction is very unlikely.

The SLAB option is never checked in any of the 13 listings, and the building is consistently characterized simply as concrete. With no remarks indicating a slab-on-grade foundation, slab construction as defined in the MLS appears not to apply here.

No analysis available

0 out of 13 listings check wood frame construction, while all check concrete, and remarks describe a standard Waikiki condo tower. This combination makes wood frame construction very unlikely for this building.

Above-ground construction is rarely marked (2/13 listings) and never mentioned in the remarks, while other construction fields focus on concrete. Given the sparse, inconsistent coding, this feature is likely not a meaningful or intended descriptor for this building.

0 out of 13 listings mention brick construction, and all point to concrete instead. With no remarks hinting at brick exterior or brick-and-mortar construction, brick construction can be safely ruled out.

No listings (0/13) indicate single wall construction, and the building type and location are inconsistent with traditional single-wall structures. This makes single-wall construction effectively ruled out.

I searched for short-term rental indicators including STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC, TVU, hotel-style rental language, or minimum-stay clues. There were no such mentions, so there is no evidence that STR is allowed in this building.

I looked for hotel-pool references like hotel rental pool, hotel-managed units, or branded rental programs. The remarks contain none of these indicators, so there is no evidence of a hotel pool program.

I searched for mandatory participation language such as required rental program, cannot opt out, or must be in the pool. Nothing in the remarks suggests a mandatory hotel pool arrangement.

Tenure terms such as 'fee simple' or 'FS' are never mentioned in the remarks, and the MLS tenure flags are blank for all 13 listings. Because tenure must exist but is undocumented here, we cannot determine whether any units are fee simple.

None of the listings mention leasehold terms, lease rent, or lease expiration, and the MLS tenure coding for these units is effectively empty. Therefore, it is not possible to confirm whether any units in this building are leasehold.

I searched for leasehold timing language such as lease expires, ground lease ends, leasehold expiring, renewed through, and lease to a specific year. None of the public remarks mention a land lease or expiry date, so the lease expiration remains unknown.

The public remarks repeatedly and directly confirm VA approval for the building. One listing also mentions a VA assumable loan, reinforcing that VA financing is available here.

The listings directly describe the building as fully insured, including phrasing like '100% insured' and '100% hurricane insurance coverage.' This is strong, repeated evidence that the HOA/building insurance coverage is full.

Agents describing the building’s amenities repeatedly mention items like guest parking, community laundry, surfboard and bike storage, and VA approval, but never fire sprinklers. With 0/13 MLS records checking the fire-sprinkler amenity, it is very likely the building does not have a fire sprinkler system.

I looked for fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, but nothing in the remarks indicated this status. Because there is no explicit evidence in the listing text, this is marked false with medium confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Although public remarks do not explicitly say “ocean view,” 1 of 13 MLS entries marks OCEAN as a view, and another marks COASTLINE, which typically implies ocean exposure. Given the building’s proximity to Waikiki Beach and the Ala Wai, it is credible that some higher or favorably oriented units enjoy ocean glimpses. This is likely a limited but real feature for certain stacks/floors.

Mountain views are well supported across the building. Multiple listings describe "Koolau Mountains" and "panoramic views of Mountains," which is consistent with the current MLS pattern (9/18 MOUNTA). This appears to be a real building-level offering rather than a one-off agent error.

Diamond Head views are one of the building’s most consistently advertised features. Across many listings, agents repeatedly use explicit phrasing like “Diamond Head view,” “stunning views of Diamond Head,” and “FULL Diamond Head view,” which strongly supports this as a building-level offering rather than a one-off unit feature.

City views appear to be available in some units based on the current MLS data (11/18 CITY). The remarks are less explicit than for Diamond Head or the canal, so this is moderate-strength evidence rather than overwhelming confirmation. It still makes sense to include because buyers searching for city-view units would likely find some options in this building.

Coastline views are not explicitly supported in the current public remarks. While the MLS has a small amount of coastline coding, the repeated agent remarks emphasize Diamond Head, canal, and golf course views instead, so this appears to be weak or possibly inconsistent data for the building.

Marketing copy repeatedly highlights Diamond Head, canal, golf course, mountains, and sunset, but never references “garden,” “courtyard,” or similar landscaped outlooks. MLS view fields also show 0 of 13 listings with GARDEN selected. This sustained absence suggests the building is not characterized by garden or courtyard views and that such a view is not a meaningful selling point here.

Golf course views are clearly present in some units and repeatedly referenced in remarks. The wording is explicit rather than implied, with multiple listings calling out the Ala Wai Golf Course and even pairing it with broader panoramic views.

Marina/canal views are strongly supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly reference the Ala Wai Canal and similar water-adjacent views, indicating this is a commonly marketable view type in the building.

One listing explicitly touts “breathtaking sunset … views,” but none mention sunrise or morning sun, and MLS data does not record SUNRIS on any of the 13 entries. Given how heavily agents market this building’s views in other directions, the lack of any sunrise references indicates that sunrise views are not a notable or commonly available feature. It is unlikely that sunrise views are a selling point for this building.

One set of remarks advertises a “front row view of Diamond Head, providing breathtaking sunset, Diamond Head, Ala Wai and mountain views right from your living room,” clearly confirming sunset exposure from at least one unit. While no MLS entries check SUNSET, agents may simply overlook this checkbox. Textual marketing evidence is strong enough to conclude some units offer sunset views.

None of the many marketing descriptions refer to a cemetery or similar use across the street, and no agent has checked the CEMETA view field in the MLS. Given that cemetery views are typically either disclosed or specifically coded when present, this consistent absence indicates the building does not have notable cemetery views. Buyers concerned about such a view are unlikely to encounter it here.

I looked for explicit phrases such as fireworks view, watch fireworks from the lanai, or see fireworks from the unit and found nothing. The public remarks focus on Diamond Head and other scenic views, but not Friday night fireworks views from the building.

No analysis available

No analysis available

There are no statements of 'no pets' or pet prohibitions in any listing, and the MLS data does not flag a no-pets restriction. While no remarks explicitly promote the building as pet-friendly, the absence of any no-pet language across all listings suggests pets are allowed in some form.

Listing remarks emphasize the building’s location, parking, community laundry, and storage amenities but never refer to any resident or on-site manager. Combined with 0/13 MLS amenity checks for a resident manager, this strongly suggests the building does not have a resident manager.

Remarks emphasize residential condo living with VA-approved financing, assigned parking, and community laundry, with no references to hotel programs or nightly rentals. This pattern and the MLS data indicate the building is a conventional condominium, not a condotel.

The building is marketed and financed as a standard condominium (including VA assumable loans) with no language about co-op shares or cooperative structures. Combined with the MLS data, this strongly supports that it is not a co-op.