Ala Wai Terrace

Consistent MLS property data across 8 listings indicate the building was constructed in 1968. No public remarks mention any alternative construction year or full rebuild that would override this.

The county assessor reports 16 floors, and the listings reach only floor 14 without penthouse listings, so there is no listing evidence for a higher residential floor. The state registration lists 17 floors, but that field is less reliable and may include nonresidential levels.

The county assessor reports 44 reconciled residential units and the state registration independently reports 44 units for this single-building registration. The stored value is supported.

Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 4971. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.

The listings support the current value of 1 elevator. References such as 'Use the stairway or elevator' and 'building features include ... elevator' are consistent with a single elevator, and no listing mentions two or more.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

At least four listings explicitly state "central AC" is included, including "central A/C included in the HOA fee" and "maintenance fees cover ... central A/C." The repeated remarks and 11/12 MLS inclusion provide very strong confirmation.

At least four listings explicitly mention cable inclusion, including phrases such as "cable" and "Spectrum internet / cable." This is consistent with the historical high-confidence determination and current MLS data showing CABTV in 11 of 12 listings.

No listing directly uses the phrase "common area electricity" or "common electric." However, 10 of 12 current MLS records include OTCOEX, and several remarks say the HOA covers "all utilities," supporting inclusion with somewhat lower confidence than the explicitly named utilities.

None of the 8 listings or remarks reference cooperative ownership or co-op tax structures. All MLS records leave the co-op tax inclusion box unchecked, supporting that coop taxes are not applicable or included here.

At least six listings explicitly mention electricity, including "maintenance fees cover electricity" and "HOA fees cover ALL utilities—including electricity." The unanimous current MLS data and repeated agent remarks make this evidence extremely strong.

Gas is not supported as a building-wide included utility. Several remarks list the included utilities in detail and omit gas, while only one of 11 current MLS records checks GAS; the isolated checkbox conflicts with the stronger historical and remark-based evidence.

At least three listings explicitly state that hot water is included, including detailed utility lists naming "hot water." All 12 current MLS records include HOTWAT, with no WTRHTR indication, strongly confirming building-supplied hot water.

At least four listings explicitly state that internet is included, including "Maintenance all inclusive with ... Internet" and "Spectrum internet / cable." The current MLS data and repeated remarks across listings strongly support this feature.

Although the building is across from the harbor and mentions nearby marina-related amenities, there is no indication that marina access or boat slip fees are paid through the HOA. All MLS entries leave the marina-included checkbox empty, supporting that marina costs are separate.

At least two listings explicitly name sewer as included in the maintenance fee, alongside water, electricity, and hot water. The unanimous current MLS data provides strong confirmation despite fewer direct remark mentions.

At least five listings mention water inclusion, including remarks stating that HOA fees cover "water" and "all utilities." The repeated disclosures and unanimous current MLS data strongly establish this feature.

Multiple listings describe lanais, views, and nearby beaches and parks but never mention BBQ or grill areas. With BBQ not selected in any MLS amenities and no textual mention, it is very likely the building lacks shared BBQ facilities.

Zero of eight current listings mark bike storage in building amenities, and no remarks mention a bike room, bicycle storage, or bike racks. With consistent omission across multiple agents and listings, the evidence strongly indicates the building does not provide dedicated bike storage facilities.

Proximity to the Ala Wai Boat Harbor is described as a location benefit, not as ownership of dock facilities. With MARINA unchecked in every listing, the building itself does not appear to have a boat dock or marina access as an amenity.

Parking and an optional nearby pool (via Waikiki Marina) are mentioned, but no car wash facility is described. The consistent absence of CRWSH in MLS amenities suggests the building lacks car wash services.

Across 8 listings, amenities like pet-friendliness, security, and utilities are stressed, but a clubhouse is never mentioned. With CLUHOU unchecked throughout, it is highly likely there is no clubhouse.

None of the listings reference concierge or front desk services, despite describing several other amenities and an on-site resident manager. This consistent omission, along with unchecked MLS boxes, indicates the building does not offer concierge service.

Agents emphasize that the building is "Pet Friendly" but do not mention any dedicated pet run or dog park. The absence of DGPRK in MLS across all listings strongly suggests there is no on-site dog park.

Across all provided remarks, there is no mention of a doorman or lobby attendant, which would typically be prominently advertised if present. The repeated focus on a resident manager rather than staffed door service strongly indicates there is no doorman.

None of the 8 current listings mention any gym, fitness room, or exercise facility, and the EXEROO amenity is never checked in the MLS data. Agents repeatedly list other amenities but omit any reference to an exercise room, indicating the building does not offer one.

Even though some listings market the property as a strong investment and urban home, they do not mention chauffeur or car services typical of luxury towers. With LIMSER at 0/8, we can be very confident there is no limo or house car service.

Listings never mention any conference or meeting facilities, focusing instead on residential and security features. The MEEROO amenity is also absent in all 8 listings, indicating no meeting room amenity.

Multiple independent listings describe units with a 'large covered lanai', 'spacious lanai', or a specific '128 sq ft lanai'. This strongly indicates that balconies/lanai-style patio spaces are a standard feature in this building, not a one-off penthouse amenity.

The remarks talk about proximity to Ala Moana Beach Park and urban conveniences, not a dedicated jogging path within the property. With WAJOPA absent from all amenities, the building appears not to have its own jogging/walking path.

Amenities described are oriented toward adults (views, utilities included, security) with no mention of kids' play structures or playgrounds. With PLYGRND unchecked in 8/8 listings, the building almost certainly lacks a playground.

All remarks focus on lanais and views rather than any yard or enclosed ground-level outdoor space. Given the urban high-rise setting and lack of any 'yard' references, it's very likely the building offers no private yard areas.

None of the marketing language references golf or a putting green, and PUTGRE is 0/8 in amenities. This combination makes it highly likely the building does not have a putting green.

Agents describe lanais and proximity to parks and the beach, but not any on-site recreation deck or amenity deck. The consistent lack of RECARE and textual mention supports that the building does not have a designated recreation area.

The only shared interior spaces mentioned are community laundry and general building access (elevator, gated entry). With no mention of a rec room and RECROO unchecked in all listings, a recreation room is very unlikely.

Agents highlight that the building is within walking distance to world-class dining and shopping rather than hosting those services itself. The RESTAU checkbox is never used, indicating the building does not contain a restaurant amenity.

Views are described from the lanai and unit windows, not from a shared rooftop or roof deck. With ROOFDCK never selected and no textual reference, the building appears not to offer rooftop amenities.

Agents list many selling points (utilities included, central AC, security, pet friendly) but never mention a sauna. The lack of SAUNA in all MLS records strongly indicates there is no sauna amenity.

Storage is strongly supported across the remarks: at least 2 listings explicitly mention extra storage, including a "highly-coveted exterior storage closet (for $30/month)" and "ample storage w/multiple closets & cabinets." Given the prior high-confidence MLS signal and the detailed, repeated references, this appears to be a legitimate building amenity rather than an unchecked MLS copy-paste item.

Nearby surf breaks and beaches do not establish storage within the building. Searches for surfboard, board, surf, and bike storage facilities found no qualifying mention.

Listings focus on location near Ala Moana, views, and utilities but never mention tennis or courts. Combined with MLS data showing 0/8 listings checking TENCOU, this strongly indicates there is no tennis court amenity.

Agents repeatedly describe utilities, sprinklers, community laundry, and security features, but do not reference a trash chute, and TRACHU is 0/8 in the amenities data. This consistent omission suggests the building likely does not advertise or offer a trash chute system.

Agents consistently describe conventional parking (e.g., 'covered parking', 'parking space "D"') without any 'valet' or 'valet parking' language. This pattern strongly suggests the building does not offer valet service.

One listing calls the property a "Secure gated community," and at least two listings note a "gated entry," aligning with MLS GATED/WALFEN checkboxes on several units. This consistent language across different remarks strongly supports that the property is enclosed by a gate or fence.

One listing notes access to a neighboring Waikiki Marina pool, but not a whirlpool or spa within this building. With no WHIRLP amenity checked and no textual mention, the building itself appears not to have a whirlpool/hot tub.

None of the 8 listings advertise a building pool in the remarks or checked amenities, despite repeatedly listing other amenities like gated entry, resident manager, and community laundry. The only pool reference is to the separate 'Waikiki Marina Pool' accessible by fob, which suggests the subject building itself does not have its own pool.

No listing remarks or MLS amenity fields reference a heated pool, and the building does not appear to have a pool at all. Given the complete absence of any 'heated' or similar language and no pool amenity, a heated pool is not present in this building.

The listings mention nearby pools or lagoons but do not establish that this building has a swimming pool or that any pool is salt water. No salt-water terminology was found in the remarks.

Multiple listings confirm in-unit laundry availability, including direct phrases like "in-unit washer/dryer" and "in-unit washer." Another remark says "washer/dryer can be installed in-unit w/ approval," which supports that the building allows it even when not currently installed. This is consistent across several listings and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.

At least 3 current listings explicitly mention community laundry, including "community laundry downstairs" and repeated references to "community laundry" as a building feature. The evidence is strong across multiple remarks and is consistent with the historical high-confidence determination and the 11/12 current MLS amenity entries.

The remarks confirm community laundry but do not establish that it requires payment. Searches for coin laundry, paid laundry, card-operated laundry, fees, and quarters found no evidence.

The listings establish that community laundry is available, including a specific reference to laundry downstairs. No remarks mention laundry rooms on every floor or floor-by-floor laundry.

Parking is strongly confirmed across all 12 listings and multiple agents. Key phrases include "large open parking stall," "one secured, covered parking stall," "secure, reserved parking," "parking space D," and "1 of only 6 covered parking stalls," indicating the building offers parking in several forms.

Assigned or reserved parking is confirmed by both MLS data and multiple current remarks. Direct language includes "secure reserved parking" and a unit-specific "parking space \"D\"" requiring a fob, indicating designated rather than merely available parking.

Covered parking is cited in several listings (at least 3), including phrases like "one secured, covered parking stall," "covered parking," and "1 of only 6 covered parking stalls," showing the building offers covered parking stalls. Multiple agents' remarks corroborate the feature.

Multiple listings confirm that parking is associated with or available to units, but none explicitly describe it as deeded, owned, or included in the unit deed. Therefore, deeded status remains unconfirmed.

No listing remarks mention EV charging, Tesla chargers, or stations, and the EVCHRG checkbox is absent on all available MLS records. Given this and the building’s age/profile, it is very likely the building does not offer dedicated EV charging at this time.

The remarks describe secured, covered, reserved, and assigned parking but do not provide a parking rental fee or monthly parking charge. The only stated monthly charge is for storage, so the parking fee is unknown.

Across all provided listings, there are no references to guest or visitor parking, and the GUEST feature is never selected in MLS data. This suggests the building does not provide dedicated guest parking stalls.

Secured parking or entry is confirmed by multiple independent listings, not just checkbox data. At least 6 remarks reference secured or gated access, including "Parking is secured," "secure gated community," "secured entry," and repeated "gated entry" descriptions.

None of the listings refer to any stalls as tandem, nor do the MLS parking_features include TANDEM for this building. This strongly indicates that tandem-style parking is not a characteristic offering here.

There are no references to valet, attended parking, or similar services in any remarks, and the VALET checkbox is never marked in MLS data. Given the building’s profile and complete lack of mention, it is almost certain that valet parking is not provided.

The listings discuss parking availability and security but do not indicate that residents must join a waitlist. No public-remark evidence supports a parking waitlist system.

Listings reference an elevator but never describe it as keyed, fob-access, restricted, or otherwise secure. Given that such a feature is typically highlighted and is not mentioned anywhere, the building almost certainly does not have keyed elevator security.

The explicit reference to an appropriate fob supports card/fob-based access control. Secured and gated-entry descriptions provide additional support for controlled building access.

None of the eight listings mention a security guard or 24/7 security staff, despite multiple references to other security features like "secured entry" and an "on-site resident manager." Given the complete absence of guard-related terms in remarks and MLS checkboxes, this building is very unlikely to have security-guard service.

The listings mention secured or gated entry, video cameras, and resident management, but these do not establish a patrol service. No specific security-patrol evidence was found.

Two listings clearly describe building features as including "video cameras" along with gated entry and an on-site resident manager. This repeated, explicit language provides strong evidence that the building has video surveillance despite unchecked MLS boxes.

Central air is strongly confirmed across the building: at least 6 current remarks explicitly mention central AC or central A/C, while 10/12 listings include ACCEN/CENAC data and 10/12 include ACCEN in inclusions. The repeated statements that AC is covered by HOA fees and available building-wide indicate this is a genuine shared building feature rather than isolated or copied unit data.

Across all provided listings, AC is consistently described as central and included in the HOA fee, with no mention of mini-splits or ductless units. The MLS split AC checkbox is never selected (0 of 8), indicating the building is not marketed as offering split AC in its units. Evidence strongly suggests there is no building-level or typical split AC feature to advertise to buyers.

None of the 11 current listings explicitly mention window AC, window air conditioners, window units, or wall AC. One listing mentions a "portable" AC vented through a window, while several others explicitly describe building-wide central AC included in HOA fees, so evidence strongly supports excluding window_ac.

All 12 of 12 current listings identify concrete in the construction materials. No public remarks explicitly say “concrete construction” or “reinforced concrete,” but the uniform MLS data across multiple listings provides strong building-level evidence.

Five of 12 current listings identify double-wall construction in the MLS materials field. None of the provided public remarks explicitly mention double-wall construction, so this appears to be a possible building feature with moderate but incomplete support rather than a uniformly verified attribute.

No listing identifies hollow tile construction, and agents only select concrete as the construction material. In the absence of any mention across multiple listings, hollow tile construction is unlikely.

Neither MLS checkboxes nor remarks indicate masonry or stucco construction. The uniform concrete designation suggests masonry/stucco is not a primary construction type here.

MLS data never lists steel frame, and every listing cites concrete construction instead. With no textual evidence of steel framing, a steel frame structure is very unlikely.

Two listings indicate slab construction and no listings indicate a different foundation type. Combined with typical construction practices for Waikiki concrete towers, this supports slab construction with moderate confidence.

No analysis available

No listings identify wood frame construction, and all instead specify concrete. Given the building type and consistent MLS data, wood frame construction can be ruled out with high confidence.

Above-ground construction is never selected in MLS data and would be unusual for this style of concrete condo tower. The evidence supports that it is not classified as above-ground construction in MLS terms.

There are no references to brick construction in MLS checkboxes or remarks. The consistent concrete designation across all listings supports excluding brick construction.

Single wall construction is never indicated and would be atypical for this type of high-rise. The MLS data and building description strongly support that it is not single-wall construction.

The building permits rentals with a 30-day minimum, which qualifies as allowed short-term rental activity under the provided definition. The remarks consistently support monthly or 30-day rental use.

The remarks support monthly rentals but provide no evidence that the building participates in a hotel rental pool. Nearby Hilton fireworks references do not establish hotel affiliation or a rental program.

The listings do not state that owners must participate in a hotel pool or rental program. References to living in the unit, personal use, and monthly rentals provide no support for mandatory participation.

One of the 8 listings clearly states it is a "fee simple" unit, and none of the remarks mention leasehold or land lease terms. Thus, the building is confirmed to have fee simple units (at least 1 of 8 listings explicitly FS, 0 of 8 explicitly LH).

No listings describe units as leasehold or reference lease rent or expiration, while at least one unit is explicitly fee simple. This pattern across multiple agents and listings makes it highly likely that the building does not offer leasehold units.

The remarks identify the unit as fee simple, so a leasehold expiration does not apply. Searches for lease expiry, ground lease, leasehold renewal, and expiration dates found no applicable year.

The remarks directly mention an assumable VA loan, providing strong evidence that VA financing is available for this unit/building. This is explicit public-remark evidence, though it describes loan assumption rather than a formal VA approval designation.

The remarks repeatedly state that HOA or maintenance fees cover utilities such as electricity, water, cable, internet, and central air conditioning. This is not evidence that the building is fully insured, and no insurance-related coverage language was found.

At least 5 listings explicitly mention fire sprinklers or sprinklered construction, including statements that sprinklers are installed building-wide and in units. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and strongly supports the current MLS data, where 11 of 12 listings include FIRSPR.

The listings provide evidence of fire-safety equipment, including sprinklers and smoke detectors. However, no remarks were found stating 'FLSE passed,' fire/life safety evaluation passed, fire safety certification, or equivalent formal compliance, so passage cannot be established.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly supported across the listings, with several agents explicitly describing 'ocean' or 'Pacific' views and one noting the building is 'across the street from the ocean.' This looks consistent across multiple remarks rather than a one-off copy-paste claim.

Mountain views appear in at least a few listings, including explicit 'mauka' references and a remark calling out 'ocean, mountains, boat harbor' views. The evidence is not universal, but it is consistent enough to confirm mountain-facing units exist.

Across all provided remarks, views are described in terms of ocean, marina/harbor, mountains, city, sunrise/sunset, and fireworks, with no mention of Diamond Head. Given the consistent omission and 0/8 MLS entries marking Diamond Head, it's very likely the building does not offer notable Diamond Head views.

City-style views are implied in several remarks, though they are less explicit than ocean/marina views. With 6/10 MLS listings marked CITY and some supporting references to Waikiki/urban surroundings, this is a reasonable include at moderate confidence.

Coastline views are less explicitly named than ocean or marina views, but the building’s direct proximity to the ocean, beaches, and harbor supports the feature. The remarks suggest broad coastal vistas rather than a single isolated claim, so this stays included with moderate-high confidence.

Listings emphasize ocean, marina, mountain, and city views, and do not describe any notable garden or courtyard outlooks. With 0/8 MLS records checking GARDEN, garden views appear not to be a defining feature of this building.

All described views focus on ocean, marina/harbor, mountains, city/Waikiki, sunrise/sunset, and fireworks, with no reference to any golf course. Combined with 0/8 MLS records checking GOLF COURSE, it's very likely the building does not offer golf course views.

At least 9 current remarks explicitly mention marina, harbor, yacht harbor, or Ala Wai Harbor views. The repeated descriptions across multiple listings and agents strongly confirm that the building offers marina-view units rather than reflecting a single copied remark.

One remark notes a 'large covered lanai to enjoy the sunrise or sunset,' indicating some units have an aspect suitable for morning sun/sunrise views. This, combined with 2/8 MLS records tagging SUNRISE, supports including sunrise views as available in the building.

At least 7 current remarks explicitly mention sunset views or related sunset experiences, including "golden sunsets," "vibrant sunsets," "marina sunset views," and "enjoy ... the sunrise or sunset." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and confirms that the building offers units with sunset views.

Across all eight sets of remarks, no agent references a cemetery or similar view, despite extensive descriptions of other outlooks. Given the urban beachfront/harbor context and 0/8 MLS entries for CEMETERY, it's highly likely there are no notable cemetery views from this building.

Multiple listings directly confirm Friday night fireworks views from units or lanais. This satisfies the requirement for a building/unit fireworks view rather than merely being near a fireworks location.

No analysis available

No analysis available

At least four separate listings highlight that the building is 'Pet Friendly' or 'pet-friendly', and no remarks contradict this. This repeated emphasis by multiple agents indicates that pets are allowed in the building.

At least 3 listings explicitly mention an 'onsite resident manager' or 'on-site resident manager.' These remarks appear across separate listings and align with RESMAN being selected in 11 of 12 listings, providing strong evidence that the building has a resident manager.

The remarks frame the building as a residential condo allowing 30-day minimum rentals, not nightly hotel-style stays. In the absence of any 'condotel' or hotel-program language, it is very likely not operated as a condotel.

The building is described as fee simple and marketed like a standard condominium, with no references to shares, co-op boards, or cooperative ownership. This strongly supports that it is not a co-op.