Ala Wai Mansion

All available MLS records for this building consistently show a construction year of 1971. None of the public remarks suggest a different build year or a complete reconstruction that would override this data.

Multiple remarks describe the building as Waikiki's iconic boutique building "Ala Wai Mansion" with "10 floors." Penthouse listings and references to units "one floor under the penthouse" align with the 10-story structure. No remarks suggest a different floor count.

Remarks repeatedly describe Ala Wai Mansion as a boutique building with "4 units per floor" and indicate there are only two units on the penthouse level. Given the explicitly stated 10 floors, the most consistent interpretation is about 34 total units (eight 4-unit floors below the penthouse and two penthouse units). No agent remarks give a different total unit number.

The remarks were searched for direct owner-occupancy percentages and descriptions such as owner occupied, majority owner occupied, and highly owner occupied. Although one listing mentions the property is suitable for investors or owner occupants, it provides no occupancy percentage, so the current value of 57% is retained with low confidence.

The remarks were searched for explicit elevator counts, elevator-related terms, lifts, and references to multiple elevators. No relevant mentions were found, so the current value of 1 is retained with low confidence and there is no evidence in the remarks to confirm or deny it.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

One listing notes 'Maintenance fee includes ... and even AC!', but this appears to refer to electricity usage rather than a central AC system, and other listings only reference individual split AC units. With 0/12 MLS entries marking central AC in fees, there is strong evidence the building does not provide central AC as a distinct, HOA-included utility.

At least 5 listings explicitly mention cable or Cable TV, including “Maintenance fee includes Electricity, Water, Sewer, Cable TV” and “HOA includes electricity, cable TV, sewer, water and internet.” The 16/18 current MLS inclusion rate and repeated remarks across listings strongly confirm this is a building-level feature.

No current remark explicitly says “common area electricity” or “common electric.” However, the OTCOEX code appears in 13 of 18 listings, which moderately supports inclusion, though this may partly reflect copied MLS association-fee data.

Listings refer to 'FEE SIMPLE opportunity' and a leasehold that could convert to fee, which is inconsistent with a cooperative structure. The single MLS COOTAX checkbox is best interpreted as an error, so co-op taxes are not considered part of the maintenance fee for this building.

At least 6 listings directly mention electricity, including “Maintenance fee includes electricity, internet, water, sewer” and “Electricity is included in the monthly maintenance fee.” The near-unanimous MLS history and repeated explicit statements from multiple listings provide very strong confirmation.

All explicit utility inclusions mention electricity, water, sewer, cable, and internet, but never gas. Combined with 0/12 MLS records marking gas included, this strongly indicates gas is not part of the HOA-included utilities.

No current public remark says “hot water included”; the repeated fee descriptions list water, electricity, sewer, cable, and internet but omit hot water. The presence of WTRHTR in 5 listings is a strong contrary indicator, so the HOTWAT checkbox appears unreliable or inconsistently copied rather than evidence of a building-wide feature.

Several listings use clear language such as “Maintenance fee includes electricity, internet, water, sewer” and “HOA includes electricity, cable TV, sewer, water and internet.” The explicit remarks, supported by 10/18 current MLS records and strong historical evidence, confirm included internet service.

Although the building fronts the Ala Wai Canal, there is no textual evidence of dedicated marina facilities or marina fees included in maintenance costs. The single MARINA checkbox is likely a data-entry error, so marina access/fees are not treated as an association-included feature.

At least 5 listings explicitly state that sewer is included, including “Maintenance fee includes electricity, internet, water, sewer” and “HOA includes electricity, cable TV, sewer, water and internet.” The 17/18 MLS rate and consistent historical pattern make this a strongly confirmed building feature.

At least 5 listings directly mention included water alongside other utilities, such as “Maintenance fee includes Electricity, Water, Sewer, Cable TV” and “HOA includes electricity, cable TV, sewer, water and internet.” The 17/18 current MLS rate and repeated cross-listing confirmation provide very strong evidence.

There are no mentions of BBQ, grills, or outdoor cooking facilities in any remarks. With 0/12 MLS records marking BBQ, it is very likely the building has no dedicated BBQ amenity.

None of the 12 listings for this building mention any form of bicycle storage (bike room, bike racks, or bike storage) in either remarks or amenities. Given the consistent absence of this feature in current MLS data and descriptions, it is highly likely that Ala Wai Mansion does not have a dedicated bike storage amenity.

The canal is used as a view feature, not as a boating amenity, and agents do not mention dock access or moorings. With MARINA unchecked in all MLS entries, the building does not provide a boat dock or marina access.

Parking is described in detail while omitting any reference to a car wash facility. With CRWSH unchecked across all MLS listings, the building likely does not offer a car wash amenity.

Ala Wai Mansion is repeatedly called a boutique building with no hint of a clubhouse or community center. MLS data and remarks together strongly indicate there is no clubhouse.

The building is marketed as a boutique Waikiki property with practical features like secured parking and storage, but concierge or front desk services are never mentioned. The lack of MLS amenity flags further supports that there is no concierge service offered.

The building is clearly pet-friendly, yet no listing advertises a dedicated dog park or pet run. With DGPRK unchecked in every MLS record, a dog park is very unlikely.

Agents repeatedly highlight location, pet-friendliness, parking, and storage, but never mention a doorman or lobby attendant. Given the consistent absence of both textual references and the MLS doorman amenity, it is very likely this building does not have a doorman service.

None of the 12 unit remarks reference a gym, fitness center, or workout room. MLS amenities data (0/12 for EXEROO) supports that Ala Wai Mansion does not offer a dedicated exercise room.

Even though some units are marketed as luxury penthouses, there is no hint of limousine or building car service. The complete absence of LIMSER in MLS supports that no limo or house car service is provided.

All remarks focus on residential use and location, with nothing about business or meeting facilities. With no MLS checks for MEEROO, the building almost certainly lacks a dedicated meeting room.

At least 10 of 12 listings explicitly feature a 'wrap around lanai', 'spacious lanai', or similar outdoor lanai space, often highlighting substantial square footage (e.g., 268–290 sq ft). Multiple agents emphasize indoor/outdoor living and using the lanai for relaxing and views, confirming building units commonly have patio/deck-type lanais. This consistent cross-agent description outweighs the under-reported MLS checkbox data.

Although the location near the Ala Wai Canal offers walking opportunities, no listing describes a dedicated jogging or walking path as a building amenity. With WAJOPA unchecked in MLS, the building does not appear to have its own jogging path.

Listings target adult lifestyle conveniences rather than family play amenities, and none mention a tot lot or playground. The complete absence of PLYGRND in MLS indicates no playground on site.

All outdoor references are to lanais and wrap-around balconies, with no indication of ground-level or fenced yard areas for any unit. Given the boutique high-rise character of Ala Wai Mansion and the absence of any 'yard' language or PRIYAR flags, it is very likely the building does not offer private yard space. Buyers seeking a private yard would not find this building suitable based on available evidence.

A putting green is a highly marketable feature that would almost certainly be highlighted if present. Since no remarks or MLS entries reference it, the building does not have a putting green.

Remarks emphasize wraparound lanais and nearby Waikiki attractions rather than any on-site recreation deck or amenity space. The absence of RECARE in MLS and in remarks indicates no formal recreation area.

Unit descriptions focus on in-unit features, storage, and parking, with no mention of a rec room or game room. With RECROO unchecked in all MLS records, a shared recreation room is very unlikely.

The building is marketed as close to dining in Waikiki rather than having its own restaurant. MLS data and the consistent phrasing in remarks indicate there is no in-building restaurant.

While some units mention wraparound lanais and penthouse levels, no listing refers to common rooftop access or a roof deck. The absence of ROOFDCK in MLS supports that there is no shared rooftop amenity.

Listings do not advertise any spa-type facilities like saunas or steam rooms. Combined with 0/12 SAUNA checks in MLS, this indicates there is no sauna in the building.

Storage is strongly supported across the listings: at least 7 explicitly mention unit-level storage, including "additional storage is conveniently located on the same floor," "assigned storage locker," and "storage locker included." The repeated remarks from multiple listings and matching MLS amenity/unit-feature data indicate this is a legitimate building offering rather than isolated copy-paste.

Listings mention general storage options such as storage lockers and extra storage on the unit floor, but none specify dedicated surfboard or board storage facilities. I searched for terms like surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and combined bike/surfboard storage and found no matches. Based on this absence, the building is assumed not to have dedicated surfboard storage.

No public remarks in any of the listings mention a tennis court (0 of 14). While 2 of 14 current MLS listings have TENCOU checked, historical review showed consistent omission of tennis facilities across prior remarks and the building is described as a small boutique property—evidence points to copy/paste checkbox errors rather than an actual tennis court.

A trash chute is indicated by MLS amenities in 9 of 18 current listings, consistent with the historical pattern of 8 of 16 listings. However, none of the 18 provided remarks mention a trash chute, so the evidence is moderate and may partly reflect copied MLS checkbox data rather than explicit agent verification.

Parking is described as 'one covered parking stall', 'assigned covered parking spot', and 'COVERED/SECURED parking', with no mention of any valet component. For a 10-story boutique building in Waikiki, valet service would be a notable amenity and is almost certainly not present given complete silence in remarks and MLS. Evidence strongly indicates there is no valet service at this property.

Remarks highlight covered/secured parking but do not indicate that the entire property is enclosed by a wall, fence, or gate. With no explicit references to a gated or fenced complex and no MLS amenity selections for GATED or WALFEN, the evidence suggests the building does not have perimeter wall/fence security as a defining feature.

In a competitive Waikiki market, a whirlpool or spa would normally be a selling point, yet it is never mentioned. With WHIRLP unchecked in all MLS records, the building almost certainly lacks a whirlpool amenity.

None of the 12 analyzed listings for this building reference a pool, lap pool, or any swimming facility in the remarks. MLS amenity fields for pool are unchecked in all cases, suggesting there is no shared pool in this building. Given how prominently agents typically advertise pools in Waikiki, this consistent absence is strong evidence that a pool is not present.

A heated pool is not mentioned in any of the 12 sets of public remarks, and the MLS amenities and pool_features fields show no indications of heating. Since the building appears not to have a pool at all, it necessarily does not have a heated pool.

The remarks were checked for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', or 'saline pool' and none were found. In the absence of any explicit reference, this building is assumed not to have a salt water pool.

In-unit laundry is strongly supported: 17 of 18 current listings show washer/dryer in the inclusions, and at least four remarks explicitly mention "in-unit washer/dryer" or that the unit "comes with a Washer/Dryer." The historical high-confidence finding is consistent with both the current MLS data and repeated remarks from multiple listings.

Across numerous listings, no remarks reference community/shared laundry, coin laundry, or a laundry room, even when other building amenities are described in detail. With only 1/12 MLS entries showing COMLAU against 11/12 omitting it and strong evidence of in-unit laundry instead, it is highly likely the building does not offer a separate community laundry facility.

Looked for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'card-operated laundry', 'laundry fee', or 'coin-op' and found no mentions. Since there is no evidence of paid community laundry in the remarks, this feature is set to false by default with moderate uncertainty.

Searched remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or other shared laundry descriptions and found none. Repeated references to in-unit laundry suggest building-wide shared laundry on every floor is unlikely, but not definitively ruled out.

Multiple listings describe included parking such as 'one covered parking stall', '1 assigned parking stall', and 'one covered and secured parking space.' With every MLS record showing some form of parking and no 'NONE' entries, building parking is strongly supported across agents and listings.

At least 4 current listings explicitly mention assigned parking, including "1 assigned parking stall" and "assigned covered parking spot." This aligns with the strong historical evidence and the current MLS checkbox appearing in 10/18 listings, indicating the feature is consistently supported rather than merely copied by one agent.

At least 7 current listings explicitly describe covered or secured parking, including "1 covered parking," "one covered parking stall," and "COVERED/SECURED parking." The evidence is strong across multiple listings and agents, and the feature is also reflected in 17/18 current MLS records.

Multiple listings describe covered or assigned parking, including "one covered and secured parking space" and an "assigned covered parking spot." Because the remarks do not use deeded, owned, or parking-in-the-deed language, deeded status cannot be confirmed.

Across a large set of listings, no agent mentions EV charging or related infrastructure, and the EVCHRG checkbox is never used. Given how prominently such a feature is typically marketed, this strongly suggests the building does not currently offer EV charging stations.

The remarks were searched for parking fees, monthly charges, rental costs, or additional parking costs. Parking is described as assigned, covered, secured, or included, with no separate fee stated.

Listings focus on each unit’s own stall (covered, assigned, secured) and never mention guest or visitor parking. With 0/12 MLS guest codes and no textual references, it is very likely the building does not provide dedicated guest parking.

Multiple agents explicitly market 'secured parking' and 'covered and secured parking space', including a building-level note that 'not all units have secured parking.' This indicates that at least some parking in the building is behind a secure entry (e.g., gate or controlled access), even if MLS checkboxes weren’t updated.

Parking is consistently described as individual stalls or spots without any mention of tandem or back-to-back configurations. The absence of both MLS coding and textual references makes it likely that tandem parking is not a feature of this building.

Across all reviewed listings, there is no mention of valet or attended parking, and the VALET checkbox is never selected. Given how prominently valet amenities are usually advertised, this is strong evidence that the building does not offer valet parking.

The public remarks were searched for parking waitlist terminology, including waiting lists and instructions to join a parking queue. No such references were found.

Public remarks focus on views, lanais, parking, and interior renovations but never mention keyed or fob-controlled elevator access. Combined with the absence of the elevator security amenity in all MLS entries, this indicates the building does not offer keyed elevator security as a notable feature.

Public remarks were reviewed for terms such as key card access, fob access, card reader, electronic access, or keycard entry and none were found. While 'secured parking' is mentioned, it does not clearly indicate a building-wide card/fob access system, so this feature is assumed not present based on available information.

Across 12 listings for Ala Wai Mansion, no remarks reference a security guard, 24/7 security, or on-site security staff. The corresponding MLS amenity box (SECGUA) is unchecked in all cases, which strongly suggests the building does not offer guard service.

The remarks were checked for indications of active security patrols, including phrases like security patrol, roving security, or patrol service, and none were present. In the absence of any explicit reference to such services, this feature is assumed not to exist in the building based on current data.

There is no explicit reference to video surveillance or security cameras in any of the 12 public remarks. With the MLS security system checkbox consistently left blank, the evidence points to the building not having a formal video security system as a marketed feature.

Across 12 listings, there are zero explicit references to central air or HVAC and no MLS central AC checkmarks. Multiple remarks highlight that only a few units have approved split AC, indicating cooling is not provided by a central system. Together this strongly supports that the building does not have central AC.

Multiple listings explicitly mention split/mini-split systems: phrases include 'Stay cool year-round with split AC' and 'One of the only units with approved split AC in bedrooms,' appearing in at least 3 separate remarks. Historical MLS checkbox data (3/15) and repeated agent remarks across different listings provide strong, corroborating evidence that some units have split AC.

No public remarks explicitly reference 'window AC' or 'window unit,' but 4 of 15 current MLS inclusion checkboxes list ACWIUN and prior confidence was Medium. Because checkbox data suggests some agents report window units but remarks do not corroborate, include the feature with moderate confidence (likely some units may have window AC, though agent copy/paste cannot be ruled out).

None of the 18 public remarks explicitly mention concrete construction, but all 18 current MLS listings identify CONCRE as the construction material. This is consistent with the previously high-confidence record and represents strong, building-wide evidence rather than a single agent's potentially copied remark.

Double‑wall construction appears on just 2 of 12 listings and is not supported or discussed in remarks, suggesting inconsistent agent use rather than a defining structural type. Given the predominately concrete characterization, the building is treated as not double‑wall construction.

Hollow tile construction is absent from all MLS construction_materials selections (0/12 with HOLTIL) and from all public remarks. With consistent concrete labeling, hollow‑tile construction is considered not present as a defining building feature.

Masonry/stucco is never checked in MLS and not described in any of the remarks. The data pattern indicates the building is not characterized as masonry and stucco construction in this market/MLS context.

Only 2 of 14 current listings list steel-frame (STEFRA) while all listings consistently indicate concrete and remarks contain no reference to steel framing. The sparse, isolated STEFRA entries appear to be copy/paste or data-entry mistakes, so steel-frame construction is not supported.

Despite the likelihood of some form of concrete foundation, the specific MLS SLAB construction flag is never used for this building (0/12) and is not referenced in remarks. Following the MLS pattern, the building is treated as not having slab construction as a recorded feature.

No analysis available

Wood frame construction is never checked in MLS (0/12 with WOOFRA) and is inconsistent with a 10‑story Waikiki condo tower. With no remarks suggesting wood framing, the building is treated as non‑wood‑frame construction.

Above‑ground construction is marked in MLS for 4 out of 12 units, and never explicitly contradicted. Although not universal across listings, the repeated checkbox use suggests the building is recognized in MLS as having above‑ground construction elements.

Brick construction is never selected in MLS and is not mentioned anywhere in the remarks across 12 listings. Given the market norms and data, the building is treated as not having brick construction.

No MLS listing marks single wall, and remarks never mention it; single‑wall is generally limited to older low‑rise Hawaii homes, not concrete condo towers. This building is therefore treated as not having single‑wall construction.

Some remarks refer generally to rental income, investment use, a vacation home, or part-time living, but none explicitly permit short-term rentals. No NUC, TVU, legal vacation-rental, or other STR authorization is mentioned.

The remarks were searched for hotel rental pool, hotel rental program, hotel operations, Hilton, Trump, Ritz, and similar terms. No such language was found, and the prerequisite of confirmed STR permission is not met.

The remarks contain no statement that owners must participate in a hotel rental pool or cannot opt out. Because STR permission is not confirmed, mandatory hotel-pool participation is also false.

One set of remarks calls a unit an "amazing FEE SIMPLE opportunity," confirming that some units in Ala Wai Mansion are fee simple. Across the provided 12 listings, at least 1 is clearly FS and 2 are clearly LH, showing a mix of tenure types in the building. Buyers can therefore find fee simple units here even though some units remain leasehold.

At least two listings clearly describe leasehold tenure, including phrases like "lease until 2050" and references to a past renegotiation where the leasehold was offered for conversion to fee simple. Among the three tenure-specified listings in these remarks, 2 are LH and 1 is FS, confirming that leasehold units (with a lease currently going to 2050) are present alongside fee simple units. This mixed-tenure profile is important for buyers evaluating long-term ownership and lease terms.

The remarks explicitly identify the leasehold expiration year as 2050. Another listing mentions that leasehold conversion to fee simple was offered during the last renegotiation, but no later lease-expiration year is provided.

The public remarks were searched for explicit VA-related language, including "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted." No such statements were found, so VA approval cannot be confirmed.

The remarks were searched for fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, walls-in coverage, and similar language. References to maintenance fees being fully inclusive concern utilities and services, not insurance, so they do not establish this feature.

Agents do not reference fire sprinklers or fire suppression systems in any of the provided public remarks. Given the lack of mention and unchecked MLS amenity fields, there is insufficient evidence to confidently state whether a building-wide sprinkler system exists.

The remarks were searched for fire/life safety evaluation language, including FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. None of these terms or equivalent statements appeared, so the feature is recorded as false with medium-low confidence based on absence of evidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are supported by multiple independently written remarks, including explicit references to the ocean and sweeping Waikiki Beach views. Although only some units have this exposure, the repeated current remarks confirm that the building offers ocean-view units.

Mountain views are documented across many listings from multiple apparent agents. Remarks consistently reference surrounding mountains, Diamond Head, or the Koolau range, making this a strongly supported building feature.

Diamond Head is explicitly referenced in numerous remarks, including 'iconic Diamond Head' and 'sweeping views ... towards Diamond Head.' Alongside 3/12 MLS entries tagging DIAMOND HEAD, this confirms that some units offer Diamond Head views.

City views are exceptionally well documented, with remarks citing 'city views,' 'city skyline,' 'Honolulu skyline,' and 'Honolulu city lights by night.' The evidence is widespread across the listing set rather than limited to a single unit.

Several listings describe direct or sweeping views of Waikiki Beach, supporting visibility of the shoreline or coastline rather than only distant open water. The evidence is present in multiple remarks, though less frequent and less explicit than the building's city, mountain, and canal views.

Agents consistently focus on canal, ocean, mountain, Diamond Head, and city views without any references to garden or courtyard outlooks. With no MLS entries tagging GARDEN, there is no evidence that garden views are a notable feature of this building.

Historical MLS flags for golf course were limited (2/14) and none of the current public remarks mention golf course or fairway views. Given the lack of explicit references in remarks and only a small number of historical flags, there is weak evidence the building offers golf course views.

The listings repeatedly identify views of the Ala Wai Canal, which meets the marina/harbor-type view definition. This feature appears across numerous units and is supported by multiple descriptions.

Sunrise exposure is explicitly advertised in current remarks and is consistent with the building's eastern-facing Ala Wai and mountain outlooks. The feature may apply only to certain units, but the building clearly offers units with sunrise views.

Current MLS data includes sunset-related terms in 5 listings, but the public remarks primarily describe panoramic or 180-degree views rather than explicitly saying 'sunset.' This supports possible evening exposure, though the evidence is weaker than for ocean, mountain, city, or canal views.

Agents repeatedly highlight many view types (canal, ocean, mountains, Diamond Head, city, sunrise) but never mention a cemetery. Given the total absence of cemetery references in remarks and MLS tags, cemetery views are very unlikely for this building.

There are detailed view descriptions but no statement that residents can watch Friday night fireworks from the units or lanais. I specifically looked for mentions of 'fireworks' or watching fireworks from the building and found none.

No analysis available

At least 6 of 12 listings clearly advertise the building as 'pet friendly' or having a 'pet-friendly policy', often in building-level descriptions rather than unit-specific exceptions. No listings contradict this or mention restrictions like 'no pets'. This consistent cross-listing language plus absence of NOPET flags supports that pets are allowed in the building.

Zero of 18 public remarks mention a resident or on-site manager. RESMAN appears in only 5 of 18 current listings, consistent with the previously low-confidence pattern and likely agent checkbox inconsistency rather than strong evidence that the building offers this feature.

Remarks focus on residential use—'call this place home', 'full-time home', 'live and work', 'ideal for investors or owner occupants'—without any reference to nightly rentals or hotel management. The absence of condotel keywords and CONDOT coding across all listings strongly indicates Ala Wai Mansion is a standard condominium, not a condotel. Buyers looking specifically for condotel operations would not find them here based on current evidence.

One listing highlights a 'FEE SIMPLE opportunity' and another discusses leasehold renegotiation, both indicating condominium-style tenure rather than share-based cooperative ownership. No agent uses 'co-op', 'cooperative', or similar language across 12 listings, which would be expected if it were a co-op. Given this and only a single COOTAX flag, the building is best classified as a condo, not a cooperative.