Ala Moana Hotel Condo

No analysis available

I searched for an owner-occupancy percentage or wording like "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied," but found nothing. The repeated references to high rental occupancy and hotel/rental pool usage speak to guest occupancy, not owner occupancy. Therefore, there is no evidence to support an owner-occupancy claim.

I looked for explicit phrases like "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or any stated elevator count in the public remarks, but none were provided. The only elevator references are proximity/security comments, which confirm elevators exist but do not reveal a number. Without a stated count, the value remains unknown.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Central air conditioning is consistently supported by both the MLS history and the remarks. Several listings explicitly say the maintenance fee includes "central A/C" or list A/C among covered utilities, indicating this is a building-wide amenity included in fees.

Cable TV inclusion is repeatedly confirmed across the listing history and current public remarks. Multiple agents use the same wording about fees covering "cable TV," which makes this a high-confidence building-level feature.

This feature is supported more indirectly than the utility items, but multiple listings mention “common expenses” or “Common and HAC Reserve” alongside the maintenance fee. The MLS data (14/20) suggests this is a real building-level inclusion, though the wording is less direct than for cable or water.

No analysis available

Electricity inclusion is one of the clearest and most consistently repeated features in the dataset. The public remarks and MLS history align strongly, with many listings explicitly stating the maintenance fee covers electricity.

No analysis available

Hot water inclusion is strongly supported by the MLS and the remarks. Several listings explicitly state "hot water" is included in maintenance fees, and there is no counter-indication from WTRHTR, so this remains a high-confidence true feature.

Internet inclusion is repeatedly confirmed across the listing set. The remarks frequently use direct language like "Maintenance Fee includes internet" and "complimentary Wi-Fi," showing strong cross-listing consistency.

No analysis available

Sewer inclusion is consistently supported by the historical MLS data and current remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention "water/sewer" or list sewer among included utilities, so this is a high-confidence building feature.

Water inclusion is consistently stated in the public remarks and strongly supported by the MLS history. Listings repeatedly say "Maintenance Fee includes ... water" and often pair it with electricity, cable, internet, and A/C. This is a high-confidence building feature.

BBQ/grilling facilities are mentioned in multiple current remarks, including explicit phrases like 'BBQ area' and 'resort amenities include ... BBQ area.' While the MLS checkbox is sparse at 2/20, the repeated wording across several listings suggests this is a real building amenity rather than a one-off agent mistake.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Concierge service is well supported across the listing remarks and aligns with the historical MLS data. Numerous listings explicitly state "concierge service" or "concierge services," and several describe a staffed front desk or full-service hotel operations. This appears to be a consistent building amenity rather than agent copy-paste noise.

No analysis available

Doorman service appears in a smaller but clear subset of listings. One remark explicitly says 'attentive doorman,' and other hotel-style descriptions mention bell desk/front desk service, which is consistent with the MLS showing DOORMA in 5/20 listings. This looks like a real amenity, though not universally referenced in every listing.

Exercise/fitness amenities are strongly confirmed across the building. Dozens of current remarks mention 'fitness center,' 'gym,' or 'exercise room,' and several specifically note the 2020 amenity renovation that included the exercise room. This appears consistent across many agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

No analysis available

Meeting-room access is supported by multiple current listings, with phrases like 'meeting facilities,' 'meeting rooms,' and 'activities center, meeting rooms.' The feature appears in enough remarks from different agents to be credible, though not every listing mentions it. The evidence supports a shared building amenity rather than a unit-specific perk.

Strongly supported. Dozens of listings mention outdoor space with phrases like "private lanai," "open lanai," "covered balcony," "amenity deck," "pool deck," and "sun deck." The evidence is consistent across many agents and appears to be genuine building/unit feature language rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Recreation-area evidence appears in many listings, especially phrases like 'amenity deck,' 'recreation area,' and 'pool deck.' The feature shows up across multiple remark styles, suggesting it is a real shared amenity rather than MLS noise.

No analysis available

On-site dining is very strongly confirmed. Current remarks consistently reference 'restaurants,' 'cafe,' 'Starbucks,' and the Signature Steakhouse, often noting multiple dining options within the building. This is repeated widely across listings and appears to be a true building-level amenity.

No analysis available

Sauna is repeatedly confirmed in the remarks and appears to be a real building amenity. Many listings mention 'sauna,' 'steam room,' and even 'dry and wet saunas,' which is strong multi-listing evidence.

No analysis available

I searched for surfboard-storage-related terms and combinations, including bike and surfboard storage, and found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence to confirm this amenity.

No analysis available

There is no meaningful remark-based evidence for a trash chute system in these listings. The only related language is about refuse collection or utilities, not a chute, so this appears to be absent or at least unverified in the available data.

Valet is strongly supported for this building. Multiple current listings explicitly reference "valet service," "valet parking," and "valet" alongside concierge and other hotel amenities, indicating this is a real building-level amenity rather than a copy-paste error. The evidence is consistent across many agents and aligns with the existing high-confidence MLS history.

No analysis available

There is some evidence for a whirlpool/hot tub/spa-type amenity, including one remark that explicitly says 'jacuzzi' and several others referencing a 'spa' or 'spa facilities.' However, most remarks use spa in a general sense rather than clearly confirming a hot tub/whirlpool, so confidence is moderate rather than high.

The building pool is overwhelmingly confirmed. Across the current remarks, dozens of listings explicitly mention a pool or swimming pool, often with related amenity descriptions like 'outdoor swimming pool,' 'pool deck,' 'pool with sundeck,' and 'renovated pool area.' The evidence is consistent across many different listings and appears to be a genuine building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.

There is strong evidence the building pool is heated. Multiple current remarks explicitly say 'heated pool' or pair the pool with heating-related language, and this aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS data. The references appear across multiple listings and agents, making this a reliable building-level amenity.

I looked specifically for salt-water pool language and found none. The pool is clearly present, but there is no public remark evidence that it is a salt pool.

I found no remark-level evidence that units have a washer/dryer in unit. The only signal is one current MLS inclusion checkbox, which is too weak to overcome the lack of any corroborating descriptions in the remarks.

Community laundry is clearly present in the building. It is supported by the historical MLS pattern (16/20 listings marked COMLAU) and is explicitly referenced in several current remarks, not just one agent description. The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings and is not limited to a single copy-paste remark.

I searched for explicit payment language such as coin laundry, coin-op, quarters, card access, or laundry fees and did not find it. Since the listings only say community laundry or laundry services without stating it is paid, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as false with low-to-moderate confidence.

The public remarks do confirm community laundry, but they specifically place it on select floors rather than on each floor. That directly contradicts the every-floor requirement, so this feature should be marked false.

Parking is clearly available at this building. Multiple listings mention "valet parking," "onsite paid car parking," and "self-parking garage," and these references appear across many agents rather than a single copy-paste source. Even though most current MLS checkbox data shows NONE, the remarks strongly support that parking exists.

Across the provided listings, there are 0 explicit remark mentions of assigned or reserved parking, while many listings mention only 'valet parking,' 'paid parking,' or state 'no deeded parking with unit.' The evidence points to parking being available through hotel/valet arrangements, not assigned stalls. The sparse current ASSIGN checkbox data does not override the consistent remark evidence.

Covered parking appears to be available in the building, but it is not consistently reflected in the MLS checkbox data. Multiple listings mention "valet parking," "self-parking garage," and "parking for daily fee," which suggests parking is provided through a garage/covered system rather than open surface stalls. The evidence is broad across many remarks, but because the MLS coding is sparse and some units note no deeded parking, this is best treated as moderate-confidence support rather than a fully explicit building-wide guarantee.

I looked for deeded/owned parking language and found an explicit denial. Several remarks also describe valet, self-parking, or paid parking, which supports that parking is not deeded with the unit.

No analysis available

I searched for a monthly parking fee, but the clearest concrete charge in the remarks is a daily parking rate. Since no monthly parking amount is stated, I captured the exact public remark charge instead.

Multiple agent remarks across listings reference valet parking, paid hotel parking (e.g., "$34.50/day parking with in and out privileges"), and self-parking/garage options, indicating the building provides parking services for guests. While only 2/20 MLS records currently checked the guest-parking box, the repeated mentions of valet/paid parking across many listings (not a single isolated ad) provide moderate evidence that guest parking is available.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

I searched for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' and similar phrases, but found no mentions. The remarks discuss valet, self-parking, and paid parking, not a waitlist system.

No analysis available

I searched for card/fob access terms and did not find any explicit match. The building appears to have security features, but the public remarks do not confirm a card-based access system.

Security guard service is strongly supported across many listings and appears consistently in the public remarks, not just the checkbox data. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "24-hour security," "security guards on site," and related controlled-access features like keyed elevators and doorman service, indicating this is a real building amenity rather than copy-paste noise.

I looked for patrol-related wording such as security patrol, roving security, or patrolled building and found none. The listings support on-site security presence, but not a patrol service specifically.

No analysis available

Central A/C is strongly supported for Ala Moana Hotel & Condominium. Across the current remarks, dozens of listings mention it directly, often in the maintenance-fee inclusions such as "A/C," "central A/C," or "central AC," which is consistent with the building-wide system. This appears to be broad, repeated evidence across many listings rather than a copy-paste anomaly.

No listings' public remarks mention split or mini-split systems (0/20 mention split/mini-split). Many listings state "Maintenance Fee includes ... A/C" or "central A/C," suggesting building-level central air rather than ductless units. Only 1/20 MLS checkbox inclusions list ACSPL, likely a checkbox error or isolated case; overall evidence does not support listing split_ac for the building.

No analysis available

Concrete construction is strongly supported for this building. The historical MLS record is unanimous, with 20 of 20 listings coded CONCRE, and there are no current remarks suggesting a change in construction type. The remarks are largely repetitive copy-paste descriptions of the building and do not undermine the existing concrete classification.

Only 1 of 20 current MLS listings lists double-wall construction and there are no remarks referencing 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' Given the isolated MLS checkbox and lack of supporting remarks or historical evidence, it's most likely an incorrect/ copy-paste entry and the building should not be classified as double-wall.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Public remarks across the reviewed listings do not support steel frame construction, and the feature is not described in the text by any agent. With only 2/20 current MLS flags and no corroborating remarks, the evidence points away from true steel-frame construction for this building.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

Evidence for above-ground construction is weaker than for concrete, but it is still supported by the repeated references to the building’s tower structure and many high-floor units across listings. While only 2 of 20 MLS entries are coded ABOGRO, the remarks consistently describe upper-story tower units, which aligns with the feature being present at the building level. This looks more like an inferred building attribute than a directly stated material specification.

No analysis available

No analysis available

The remarks repeatedly state that short-term rentals are allowed, including 'grandfathered' and 'legally permitted' language. Multiple listings also describe nightly vacation rentals and hotel-rental program participation.

The public remarks consistently show the building participates in a hotel rental pool/program. This is reinforced by repeated references to Mantra-managed hotel rentals and units being 'in the hotel pool.'

I looked for language showing mandatory participation, but the remarks repeatedly describe the hotel program as optional. Because owners can self-manage, hire outside management, or use the hotel pool, mandatory participation is not supported.

No analysis available

No analysis available

I searched the remarks for any leasehold language such as lease expiration, ground lease end dates, renewal terms, or leasehold references. The only clear land-tenure statement found was "Fee Simple," which means this feature is not applicable for this building context. Accordingly, there is no lease expiry year to report.

I searched for explicit VA approval / VA financing language and found none. The remarks instead reference other financing options like seller financing and Finance Factors condo hotel financing, which does not support VA approval.

I looked for HOA insurance wording that would indicate walls-in or comprehensive building coverage, but the remarks do not mention insurance at all. The listings focus on amenities, rental program details, and renovations rather than coverage terms. With no explicit insurance statement, this remains unconfirmed.

Fire sprinkler coverage is strongly supported across the listing history for Ala Moana Hotel Condo. Multiple remarks explicitly mention a sprinkler system or that fire sprinklers were installed/in place, and this appears consistently across many listings rather than a one-off agent copy. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting the feature was removed.

I searched for language such as "fire life safety evaluation passed," "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," or "passed fire inspection," but found no such statement. The remarks do mention fire sprinklers, which indicates a safety feature but does not verify a formal passing evaluation. Based on the remarks, there is no evidence this feature is confirmed.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly established for this building. Dozens of remarks explicitly mention "ocean views," "Pacific Ocean," "partial ocean view," "ocean and harbor views," and "parallel to coastline," often from multiple towers/floors and stack types, so this does not look like agent copy-paste noise. The current MLS pattern and the remarks align very closely.

Mountain views are well supported but not universal. Many current remarks reference "mountain views" or combinations such as "ocean, mountain and city view," indicating that the building definitely offers mountain-view units from multiple sides and floors.

Moderate-to-strong evidence that some units offer Diamond Head views: 5 of 20 listings list DIAHEA and remarks include direct phrases like "Diamond Head side" and "offering breathtaking views of the famed Diamond Head." Evidence is repeated across listings and agents, indicating Diamond Head views exist for certain units.

City views are strongly confirmed at the building level. Many remarks describe "city views," "city skyline," "Honolulu city lights," and combined city/ocean/mountain panoramas, with repeated confirmation across multiple listings and unit stacks. The evidence is consistent and strongly supports keeping city views as a building feature.

Coastline views are clearly supported across the listings. Several remarks explicitly say "parallel to coastline," "coastline views," or "ocean coastline views," and these references appear in multiple units and across multiple agents. This is strong building-level evidence rather than an isolated statement.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Marina/harbor views are clearly present in some units, even if less common than ocean views. Multiple remarks mention 'Ala Wai Harbor,' 'Ala Wai Yacht Harbor,' 'boat harbor,' 'harbor views,' and 'panoramic marina' views. The consistency across different listings supports this as a real building feature.

Several listings reference morning/eastern exposure and phrases like "morning sun" and "east-facing", indicating that some units provide sunrise or morning views. Mentions are fewer than ocean/city references but are present across multiple listings.

Sunset views are well supported by both historical and current remarks. Multiple listings explicitly say "sunset views," "beautiful sunsets," or describe "sunset" from lanais and corner units, indicating this is a real building-level feature for some units. The repeated wording across different listings suggests broad support rather than a one-off agent claim.

No analysis available

This is direct public-remarks evidence that units in the building can view Friday night fireworks. The wording is explicit and unambiguous, so this feature is supported with very high confidence.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Strong evidence across many listings supports a resident/on-site manager presence in the building. Multiple remarks explicitly mention “Onsite Property MGR,” “on site property management,” or the hotel being “managed by Mantra/Mantra Group,” which is consistent with a building-level management office. This appears repeatedly across many agents and is not just a single copy-paste mention, so confidence is very high.

No analysis available

There is no meaningful remark evidence that this building is a cooperative. Instead, the listings consistently call it a hotel condominium/condotel, which is incompatible with a co-op designation, and only 1/20 MLS records shows COOTAX in association fee includes. This looks like a stray MLS coding artifact rather than a true cooperative building feature.