Acacia Park
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Acacia Park
Building Overview
Acacia Park in Pearl City — concrete building (built 1986) with BBQ area; parking available; pets allowed.
About Acacia Park
Acacia Park is a condominium located in the Pearl City neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1986 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count are not provided in the available MLS data.
The property offers a shared BBQ area as an onsite amenity. No other common facilities are listed in the provided records.
Parking is listed as available. Pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the MLS information. Management company is not specified in the records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The remarks discuss suitability for both owners and investors but do not give any figures or descriptions of the owner-occupancy rate. I searched for explicit percentages and terms like 'owner occupied' and found none, so the owner-occupancy percentage remains unknown.
The public remarks for multiple listings do not reference elevators at all. I searched for terms like 'elevator', 'elevators', and 'lift' and found no mentions, so the number of elevators remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
11 of 13 recent MLS listings for this building include OTCOEX/other common expenses in the association_fee_includes field, suggesting common-area operating costs such as electricity are covered by the maintenance fee. Public remarks do not explicitly list common-area electricity but consistently describe shared amenities (playground, BBQ, site manager) that typically rely on common power. The consistency across many different listings and agents indicates this is a building-wide inclusion rather than a one-off error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
13 out of 13 recent listings explicitly indicate SEWER in the association_fee_includes field, strongly implying that sewer charges are included in the maintenance fees for this building. Although the public remarks focus on renovations, location, and amenities rather than utilities, there is no conflicting evidence. The universal MLS checkbox selection across multiple agents provides strong building-wide confirmation.
Every one of the 13 recent listings shows WATER included in the association_fee_includes, indicating that water service is paid through the maintenance fees. Public remarks do not explicitly mention water, but there is no language contradicting the MLS data. The unanimous pattern across many units and agents strongly supports that water is a standard included utility for this building.
Multiple listings for Acacia Park explicitly mention shared BBQ amenities, including phrases like "playground and BBQ/picnic area," "private park with picnic tables, BBQ grills," and "amenities include site manager, BBQ area, guest parking, and playground." Combined with 11 of 13 current MLS entries checking BBQ in the amenities, this provides strong, building-wide evidence that residents have access to BBQ/grilling facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings for Acacia Park explicitly mention in-unit laundry, including phrases like 'washer & dryer in unit', 'in-unit washer/dryer', and 'full-size washer & dryer.' Combined with MLS data showing 12 of 13 listings including washer/dryer, this strongly indicates that units in this building commonly have in-unit laundry. Buyers seeking in-unit washer/dryer should consider this building as offering that feature in at least some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 13 current MLS listings indicate some form of parking (assigned/open/covered) and none report ‘NONE’ in ParkingFeatures. Remarks from several listings reference “one assigned parking stall in front of the unit,” a “designated (uncovered) parking stall,” “many guest parking stalls,” and an “additional parking lot…rented,” showing consistent, multi-agent evidence that the building offers resident and guest parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple units clearly have assigned or designated stalls, yet there is no explicit language such as 'deeded parking', 'owned stall', or 'parking included in deed'. In the absence of such wording, deeded parking cannot be confirmed and is treated as not indicated in the remarks.
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly identify an additional parking option available for $25 per month. This matches prior understanding of a $25/month parking rental, so the monthly parking fee is set to 25 based on direct wording in the listing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks discuss assigned stalls, guest parking, street parking, and a rented additional lot, but never reference any waitlist system. I specifically searched for 'parking waitlist' and related phrases and found no evidence that a waitlist is used.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 13 recent listings, 2 explicitly mark ABOGRO in construction materials and the rest do not contradict above-ground construction. Remarks reference ground-floor units, lanais, and outdoor common areas, all consistent with a conventional above-ground condo complex rather than any partially underground structure. Given the building type and lack of opposing evidence, it is very likely constructed above ground.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All remarks describe a conventional residential/townhome-style condo with amenities like BBQ, playground, and a site manager, with no references to nightly/weekly rentals or hotel-style management. I searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'NUC', 'TVU', or minimum night requirements, and none appear, so STR use is presumed not allowed based on available text.
Listings never reference a 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel program', or management by a hotel brand, and instead emphasize typical condo living. Since there is also no evidence that STRs are allowed, participation in a hotel rental pool can be ruled out from the remarks.
Because there is no evidence of a hotel rental pool, there cannot be a mandatory participation requirement. I also found no language like 'mandatory rental program', 'must be in hotel pool', or 'cannot opt out', so mandatory pool participation is effectively excluded.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks confirm at least one unit is leasehold with the fee available to purchase, but no listing gives a specific lease expiry year. I looked for phrases like 'lease expires', 'lease to', or 'ground lease ends' followed by a year and found none, so the expiration year remains unknown.
All listings emphasize renovation, location, and pet-friendliness but never reference VA loan approval. I searched for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and 'VA loans accepted' and found none, so VA approval is presumed not in place based on available remarks.
The phrase 'pet-friendly and 100% insured community' strongly indicates full HOA building insurance (walls-in coverage). This matches prior data and is treated as clear, current confirmation that the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
None of the listings mention a fire/life safety evaluation, passing a city fire inspection, or life-safety compliance. Because this is typically highlighted when present and there are no references at all, this feature is set to false with medium confidence due to lack of explicit evidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 13 listings, none include garden or courtyard views in the MLS view descriptions, and over half explicitly state the view is 'NONE.' While remarks mention a 'private park' and nearby open parks, they do not indicate that any units enjoy specific garden views, so this building is not treated as offering garden-view units for buyers searching with that filter.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.