801 South
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
801 South
Building Overview
801 South in Ala Moana-Kakaako, built 2015, concrete construction with ocean and mountain views; amenities include a security guard and covered parking.
About 801 South
801 South is a residential building located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood, completed in 2015. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete and offers ocean and mountain views. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, key building features include a security guard, split air conditioning in units, and covered parking. The building does not allow pets and does not permit short-term rentals according to the available records. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
Additional details such as maintenance fees, specific parking allocations, unit amenities, and onsite management contact are not provided in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all details, including policies and fees, with listing agents or property management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Searched all public remarks for explicit owner-occupancy statements or percentages (e.g., 'owner occupied', '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied') and found none. Without explicit statements in the public remarks or a provided current numeric value, owner-occupancy percentage is unknown and set to null; we will not guess a percentage.
Searched all public remarks for explicit elevator references (e.g., 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'multiple elevators', 'elevator bank') and found none. Because no numeric elevator information is provided in the remarks and no current numeric value was supplied, the number of elevators is unknown (set to null). Per rules, we will not guess a numeric value without explicit evidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data is mixed: 8 of 20 current listings indicate cable included (historical medium confidence). None of the public remarks explicitly state 'cable included' and remarks focus on internet/Wi‑Fi instead, suggesting inconsistent agent checkbox use. Because some listings still show CABTV checked, the building is flagged as offering cable in fees (implied).
18 of 20 current listings include OTCOEX in association_fee_includes and multiple agents' remarks state "electricity is sub metered" or that electricity is "itemized on the monthly maintenance fee statement." Evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to reflect the building practice (not a single isolated listing).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 20 listings list HOTWAT while 11 of 20 include WTRHTR and multiple remarks mention "in unit water" or in‑unit water heater/washer-dryer. This strongly supports that hot water is supplied by in‑unit heaters and is not included in the maintenance fee.
Multiple listings explicitly state internet is included or billed through HOA (phrases like "low maintenance fees include internet ($21)", "Other Fee of $21 per month is for internet", and "bulk internet will increase $1 each year"). This is noted across many agent listings and aligns with MLS checkbox data, providing strong evidence that internet is included.
No analysis available
19 of 20 MLS records list SEWER in association_fee_includes. Although public remarks rarely mention sewer explicitly, there are no remarks contradicting sewer being included and the MLS coverage is consistent across listings.
19 of 20 MLS records include WATER in association_fee_includes. Remarks seldom state "water included" explicitly, but there is no contradictory language and the MLS checkbox is consistent across nearly all listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence: at least 3 separate public remarks mention 'car washer' or 'car wash area' (e.g., 'car washer, bike & surfboard storage areas', 'charging stations and car wash area'), though only 2/20 MLS amenities checkboxes list CRWSH. Multiple agents mention it in remarks, but the MLS checkbox uptake is low, so include the feature with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No substantive evidence for a dog park: only 1 of 20 MLS entries lists DGPRK while none of the public remarks mention a 'dog park', 'dog run' or dedicated pet exercise area. Many listings say 'pet friendly' (policy details) but that does not imply a dog park, so we mark dog_park false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence: 12+ listings/remarks and MLS amenity checkboxes indicate meeting-room amenities (CURRENT MLS: 12/20). Listings frequently state 'meeting room', 'party/meeting room', and 'large party/meeting room', showing consistent agent reporting and multiple independent confirmations of a shared meeting/conference space.
At least 6 separate listing remarks explicitly reference lanais or covered lanais (phrases include 'private lanai', '54 sq ft lanai', and 'covered wrap-around lanai'), indicating building units offer outdoor deck/patio space. Although only 2/20 current MLS checkboxes list PATDEC/COVPAT, the repeated independent agent remarks across multiple listings provide direct evidence that patio/deck amenities exist in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence: 14+ listings/remarks and MLS amenity checkboxes indicate rec-room amenities (CURRENT MLS: 14/20). Remarks include explicit phrases like 'recreation area', 'large rec room', 'spacious party/rec room', and 'recreation rooms', repeated across multiple agent listings, demonstrating consistent and corroborated presence of a shared recreation room.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks repeatedly advertise surfboard/board storage (e.g., 'bike & surfboard storage areas', 'surf/bike storage'), providing strong, explicit evidence that surfboard storage exists in the building.
No analysis available
Implied evidence: 15 of 20 current MLS listings mark a trash/garbage chute (CURRENT MLS: 15/20) but none of the public remarks explicitly mention 'trash chute' or 'garbage chute'. Given the consistent MLS checkbox reporting but absence of remark confirmations, inclusion is recommended with moderate confidence (implied rather than explicitly described).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The provided building context lists pool=False and the public remarks do not mention a pool or 'salt water pool' terminology. Searched for 'pool', 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline' and found no matches.
Strong, building-wide evidence: all 20 MLS listings historically included washer/dryer and current public remarks across multiple listings repeatedly state phrases like 'in-unit washer/dryer', 'Washer/Dryer in unit', and 'new in-unit washer/dryer'. Multiple agents consistently mention the feature (likely some copy/paste), and the repeated, explicit remarks across every listing provide high confidence that some units in the building offer in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'coin-op', 'paid laundry', 'card operated' or 'quarters' and found no references. Listings consistently state in-unit washer/dryers and do not describe paid shared laundry facilities.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found none. Listings repeatedly emphasize in-unit washer/dryers and building amenities but do not describe community laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly offered building-wide: 20/20 MLS entries include parking checkbox fields and many remarks state unit parking stalls (examples: "two unassigned parking stalls conveyed with unit" and "one unassigned covered parking stall"). Evidence is consistent across many agent remarks and MLS fields, indicating strong, building-level parking availability.
No analysis available
Covered parking is well-documented: 16 of 20 listings (and many public remarks) explicitly state covered or covered/unassigned parking stalls — e.g., 'one unassigned covered parking stall', 'comes with a covered and unassigned parking stall', and references to a parking structure. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and matches historical MLS checkbox data, indicating strong building-level availability of covered parking.
Public remarks consistently state parking stalls are 'unassigned' (not deeded) in multiple listings, implying parking is not deeded to the unit. This language indicates parking is conveyed but unassigned rather than owned with the deed.
No analysis available
Public remarks repeatedly list a parking maintenance fee of $2.04/month (with a single mention of $2.31 in one update). I select $2.04 as the commonly cited monthly parking maintenance fee based on multiple listings.
Guest parking is available in the building: 11/20 MLS entries include guest parking and numerous public remarks mention "guest parking" or "ample guest parking." The combined MLS checkbox prevalence and repeated agent remarks provide strong evidence that guest parking is offered.
Secured parking/entry is repeatedly mentioned across listings: at least 15 of 20 public remarks reference 'secured entry', 'secured building', or '24-hour security' (e.g., 'Secured entry', 'secured building entry', '24-hour security'). This consistent language across multiple listings and agents supports a high-confidence determination that the building offers secured entry/secure parking access.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list for parking', and related instructions; none of the listings mention a waitlist. Remarks describe unassigned stalls, additional parking availability, and ample guest parking instead.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit terms like 'key card access', 'fob access', or 'card reader' and found none. Because listings repeatedly state 'secured entry' and previous data indicated possible electronic access, I retained the current/assumed value but with low confidence due to lack of explicit evidence.
Strong, consistent evidence the building offers on-site security: the historical data flagged SECGUA in 17/20 listings, and current remarks in the listing corpus repeatedly state '24-hour security', '24 hrs security', '24/7 secure' and 'secured entry'. Multiple listings (the majority of unit descriptions) explicitly advertise 24-hour/24-7 security and secured building entry, showing broad confirmation across agents rather than an isolated entry.
I searched for explicit references to a patrol/security patrol service and found none. Listings do mention 24-hour security presence and an on-site manager/guard, but no roving or patrol service is described.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 current MLS listings include ACSPL and many public remarks across multiple agents explicitly mention split/ductless systems — sample phrases include "NEW split air-conditioners (3)", "split AC in every room", and "Mitsubishi split AC... installed in 2020". The consistency and occasional specific install years across different listings indicate this is a real, building-wide/unit-level feature rather than isolated copy/paste; evidence is strong across listings.
No analysis available
High confidence that the building is concrete: 19 of 20 current MLS listings list construction_materials as 'CONCRE'. None of the provided public remarks explicitly mention a change in primary construction (no phrases like 'wood framed' or 'recently rebuilt' were found), so the historical MLS consensus is maintained despite remarks lacking explicit confirmation.
Public remarks explicitly state 'double walls' (e.g., "equipped with ... double walls") in the provided listings (1+ mentions), giving clear textual confirmation despite only moderate historical checkbox frequency. This explicit remark supports including double-wall construction as a building feature for prospective buyers.
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 20 MLS listings have 'STEFRA' checked, but public remarks contain no mentions of 'steel frame' across the dataset. With no descriptive confirmations in remarks and minority checkbox usage, evidence for steel-frame construction is weak and likely not a reliable building-level characteristic for buyer searches.
3 of 20 MLS listings check 'SLAB', but public remarks in the current dataset contain no references to 'concrete slab' or similar foundation descriptions. Given the absence of corroborating remarks and the low historical checkbox frequency, there is weak evidence to assert a slab foundation for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched listings for explicit STR-related terms and for 30-day minimum or owner-occupant restrictions; none were present. With no STR language in the public remarks, STR allowance is not indicated.
Looked for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', and brand-managed rental language; none were found. Because STRs are not indicated, hotel pool participation is not present in the public remarks.
Searched for wording such as 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'cannot opt out' and found none. Given no indication of STR or hotel pool, there is no evidence of a mandatory pool participation requirement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring in', and 'renewed through' but found no reference to any lease expiry year. Building appears to be standard ownership with no leasehold details provided in public remarks.
Public remarks explicitly state the building is VA and FHA approved in multiple listings, indicating VA financing is accepted. This is clear, explicit language in the remarks.
Several listings explicitly state the building is fully insured or 100% insured (examples include 'Building is fully insured', 'Building is 100% insured', and 'Building is 100% insured and is VA and FHA approved'), providing strong evidence that the HOA carries walls-in/full building insurance.
High confidence the building is fire-sprinklered: historical MLS checkbox data lists FIRSPR in 16/20 listings and current public remarks explicitly mention 'fire sprinklers' or 'fire-sprinklered' in approximately 10–14 listings (examples: 'equipped with fire sprinklers', 'this high-rise fire-sprinklered building', 'Fire sprinklers provide added peace of mind'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and aligns with historical checkbox data.
Searched the remarks for explicit FLSE phrases (e.g., 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection'). While the listings repeatedly note fire sprinklers and that the building is fully insured and VA/FHA approved, there is no explicit mention that a fire/life safety evaluation was passed. Per the boolean rules, absence of any explicit mention and no existing current value results in false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Building-level ocean views are frequently advertised: at least 10 listings mention ocean/coastline views with phrases like "ocean views", "partial ocean and city views", and "sweeping views of the ocean". Evidence appears across multiple agents' remarks and aligns with prior high-confidence historical data, indicating some units in the building do offer ocean views.
Strong, repeated evidence across current public remarks indicates mountain views. Multiple listings (many of the unit descriptions) state phrases like "mountain views", "Koolau mountains", and "Koolau" (examples: "sweeping... the Koolau mountains", "Panoramic views... the Koolau mountains"). Evidence appears across listings and agents rather than a single typo, so confidence is high.
No analysis available
Multiple current public remarks explicitly advertise city/downtown/city skyline views. Phrases appear repeatedly across listings such as "city views", "city skyline", and "Downtown Honolulu views" (examples: "city and ocean views", "panoramic downtown... views"). This is consistent across many agent listings, supporting high confidence.
Strong and repeated evidence in current public remarks for coastline/ocean/harbor views. Many listings include phrases like "ocean views", "harbor views", "ocean, coastline, and city skyline", and "sweeping views of the ocean/coastline/harbor," appearing across multiple agents' listings. This supports high confidence that the building offers coastline views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Limited but relevant evidence for sunrise/eastern exposure: at least one listing notes the unit is "Facing the SE direction," which implies morning/sunrise exposure. Mentions are not widespread across listings, so confidence is moderate (implied rather than explicitly "sunrise").
Historical data previously showed strong indication of sunset/western exposure, but the current set of public remarks contains no explicit 'sunset' or 'western exposure' phrases. Because historical confidence was high and there is no overwhelming new evidence to overturn it, the feature is kept as available to some units but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit language like 'watch fireworks from lanai', 'fireworks view from unit', or 'see fireworks from' and found none. Remarks mention ocean/harbor/city views but do not state that Friday night fireworks are visible from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderately high confidence the building has an on-site/resident manager: historical MLS data shows RESMAN in 11/20 listings and current public remarks explicitly reference 'on-site resident manager', 'on-site management' or 'on-site mgr' in roughly 6–9 listings (examples: 'on site manager', 'on-site resident manager', 'on-site management (Bldg B)'). The mentions appear across multiple listings and agents, supporting inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.