801 South
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
801 South
Building Overview
801 South in Ala Moana-Kakaako, built 2015, concrete construction with ocean and mountain views; amenities include a security guard and covered parking.
About 801 South
801 South is a residential building located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood, completed in 2015. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete and offers ocean and mountain views. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, key building features include a security guard, split air conditioning in units, and covered parking. The building does not allow pets and does not permit short-term rentals according to the available records. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
Additional details such as maintenance fees, specific parking allocations, unit amenities, and onsite management contact are not provided in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all details, including policies and fees, with listing agents or property management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The public remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy percentage or qualitative owner-occupancy statements. Without an explicit value in remarks or a current numeric value to retain, owner-occupancy remains unknown.
There is no explicit mention of any elevators in the public remarks. Because no numeric/current value was provided in the input and remarks contain no elevator references, I will not guess a number.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Across 19 listings, just 6 check the MLS box for cable, and 13 do not, with no textual remarks like “cable included in HOA” or “cable service included in fees.” Agents repeatedly highlight low maintenance fees without ever citing cable as a covered utility, suggesting cable is paid separately by owners rather than included in monthly maintenance.
19 of 20 current MLS records include OTCOEX (common-area electric) suggesting the building maintenance fee generally includes common electricity. Public remarks do not explicitly state 'common area electricity included'; one listing notes 'Electricity is submetered and itemized on the monthly maintenance fee statement' (ambiguous). Evidence appears consistent across multiple agent listings and may reflect copy/paste of MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 20 MLS records include HOTWAT while 11 of 20 listings list WTRHTR (in-unit water heaters), and no public remarks say 'hot water included' or similar. This strongly indicates hot water is not a maintenance-fee-included service for the building.
Several listings explicitly note 'Other Fee of $21 per month is for internet' (appears across multiple listings/units) and building materials also reference bulk internet billed as a separate monthly charge. This contradicts some MLS INTSER checkboxes, so fee_inc_internet should be false.
No analysis available
19 of 20 MLS records indicate sewer is included in HOA/maintenance fees. Public remarks across listings do not state otherwise, and the MLS evidence is consistent across multiple agent entries, supporting inclusion of sewer in the maintenance fee.
19 of 20 MLS listings include WATER as part of the association fee. Public remarks do not explicitly state 'water included' but also provide no contrary statements; the MLS checkbox data is consistent and supports that water is included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clear, repeated mentions in the public remarks: 'meeting & recreation areas', 'large party/meeting room', 'meeting room', 'party and meeting rooms' appear across the supplied listings (appears in ~13 listings). Historical MLS checkbox counts (14/20) and the remarks together provide strong evidence this building offers meeting/conference room(s).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence: public remarks reference 'recreation areas', 'large party/rec room', 'spacious party/rec room', 'recreation rooms' across the supplied listings (appears in ~14 listings). Combined with prior MLS checks (15/20), this is a building-level shared amenity confirmed by multiple agents and descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several public remarks explicitly advertise surfboard (board) storage facilities (e.g., 'bike & surfboard storage areas'). This provides strong evidence the building offers surfboard storage.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data strongly suggests a trash/garbage chute (16 of 20 current listings checked), however none of the provided public remarks mention 'trash chute', 'garbage chute', or similar. This yields moderate confidence (likely present based on MLS fields, but not explicitly confirmed in agent remarks and could be copy-paste).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is listed as having no pool in the provided context and public remarks contain no pool references or 'salt water/saltwater' language. I am keeping pool_salt as false with low confidence due to lack of mentions.
All available listings (20/20 per MLS history) and multiple current public remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry. Representative quotes include "in-unit washer & dryer", "Washer/Dryer in unit", and "in-unit W/D", repeated across listings and unit types, showing strong, consistent evidence that some units in the building have in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
I searched listings for terms indicating paid community laundry (coin-op, card, paid laundry) and found no such language. Given the lack of evidence, this feature is assumed absent.
Listings consistently advertise in-unit washer/dryers across units. I searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found none; therefore community laundry on every floor is not supported by the remarks.
All 20 current MLS listings include parking (MLS checkboxes show open/assigned/covered/garage). Public remarks across many unit listings explicitly state parking stalls—examples: '2 parking', 'two unassigned parking stalls', 'one unassigned covered parking stall'—showing strong, consistent evidence from multiple agents and listings.
No analysis available
A strong majority of MLS entries (17 of 20) list covered or garage parking, and multiple public remarks explicitly mention 'covered parking stall' or 'covered and unassigned parking stall'. Evidence is consistent across many listings and agents, supporting covered parking at the building.
I searched for 'deeded parking', 'owned stall', 'parking included in deed' and found none. Multiple units are described as coming with 'unassigned' stalls, and some unit remarks list TMK numbers for stalls but do not explicitly state the stall is deeded.
No analysis available
Several listings cite a monthly parking maintenance charge, most commonly $2.04/month (one note shows $2.31). Using the repeated amount of $2.04 as the representative monthly parking maintenance fee.
Twelve of 20 MLS entries flag guest parking and multiple public remarks state 'guest parking' or 'ample guest parking' (one listing even cites '30 guest parking'), indicating that guest parking is offered in the building. Evidence is fairly broad though not universal across all unit listings.
Seven MLS listings include secured-entry parking, and several public remarks explicitly state 'secured building entry' or 'Two unassigned parking stalls in a secured building.' While the language refers to secured building access rather than a gated/parking-specific card gate in every listing, the recurring references across multiple listings provide sufficient evidence to include secured entry for parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', 'join waitlist' and related phrases; remarks discuss guest parking, unassigned stalls, and availability of additional parking but do not mention a formal waitlist.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit terms like 'key card access', 'fob access', or 'card reader' and found none. While the building is described as secured, there's no direct evidence of card/fob access in the public remarks.
Strong evidence the building provides on-site security: 16/20 historical listings had SECGUA and numerous current remarks explicitly state '24-hour security', '24/7 secure', or '24 hrs security'. This confirmation appears across multiple agent remarks and listings (e.g., 'offers 24-hour security', '24/7 secure high-rise', 'with 24 hrs security, on site mgr'), indicating consistent, building-level security service.
I looked for language indicating a security patrol or roving/patrol service and found none. The building does have 24-hour security per listings, but there is no explicit mention of a patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 20 current MLS listings include ACSPL and numerous public remarks explicitly mention split/ductless systems — examples include "3 split A/C", "brand-new split A/C unit", and "Mitsubishi split AC units were installed...in 2020". Multiple listings provide specific details (installation years and brand), indicating the feature is real and widespread rather than a single agent copy/paste.
No analysis available
Strong MLS evidence: 19/20 current listings list 'CONCRE' as the construction material, giving high historical confidence that the building is concrete. None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'concrete' or a recent rebuild, but there is also no contradictory language; given the consistent MLS checkbox data across multiple listings/agents, the building is reported as constructed with concrete.
About half of the listings (9 of 19) mark double wall (DOUWAL), and none explicitly contradict this in the remarks. Although agents are somewhat inconsistent in checking this box, the frequency of its use and typical local construction patterns for newer high-rises support treating double wall construction as present. The feature is therefore included with moderate, implied-confidence evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
A minority of listings (5 of 19) check the steel frame (STEFRA) box, but most do not, and no remarks reference steel frame construction. Given the strong concrete consensus and lack of textual support for steel framing, these few STEFRA entries are likely agent input errors. As a result, steel frame construction is not treated as a defining feature of the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'STR', '30-day minimum', 'transient', 'NUC', and related terms; found no language permitting STR. Therefore STR is treated as not allowed based on available remarks.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', 'managed by hotel', and similar phrases; none were found. Because STR is not indicated as allowed, hotel-pool participation is false.
Searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', 'must be in rental program' and did not find any such language. With no STR allowance and no hotel-pool mentions, mandatory pool is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring', and 'ground lease ends' but found no leasehold/expiry year or renewal information.
Multiple listings explicitly state the building is VA approved. This is clear evidence in the public remarks that VA financing is accepted.
Several listings explicitly state the association/building is fully insured (walls-in/100% insured), providing strong evidence that the building is fully insured by the HOA.
Strong, consistent evidence across listings that the building is fire-sprinklered: the MLS checkbox is high historically (15/20 previously; 16/20 current) and multiple remarks explicitly state phrases like 'fire sprinklers', 'equipped with fire sprinklers' and 'fire-sprinklered building'. Evidence appears across listings from multiple agents and matches the historical checkbox data.
The listings frequently note fire sprinklers in units and the building, but do not state that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE) or similar certification. Absence of explicit FLSE language leads to a default false with medium-low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
At least four separate listings describe ocean views, including phrases like "partial ocean and city views," "with ocean views!" and "some ocean views," often in high-floor and corner units. This consistent agent-written narrative strongly indicates that the building offers ocean-view units even though the MLS view checkboxes are not marked. Buyers seeking ocean views should consider this building as it clearly has units with that exposure.
Multiple public remarks explicitly reference mountain or Koolau views (phrases include “mountain views,” “Koolau mountains,” and “Koolau mountains”). At least a dozen listing remarks in the aggregated public remarks describe mountain or Koolau aspects, and this is consistent across different unit ads and agents, indicating building-level mountain views are available.
No analysis available
Numerous listings reference city or downtown views (phrases include “city,” “downtown Honolulu,” and “city skyline” or “panoramic downtown”). Multiple units across the aggregated remarks note partial or panoramic city/downtown views, showing this building offers city-view units.
Several listings explicitly reference coastline/ocean/harbor views (phrases include “ocean, coastline,” “harbor views,” and “ocean views”), with multiple unit remarks describing ocean or coastline sightlines. Evidence from multiple agent listings indicates some units in the building offer coastline views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Zero of the current aggregated public remarks mention “sunset,” “western exposure,” or similar phrases; MLS view field also shows 0/20 listings with SUNSET. Despite prior higher historical confidence, there is now consistent lack of any sunset-related language across multiple listings and agents, indicating the building should not be listed as having sunset views.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'watch fireworks from', 'fireworks view', or 'see fireworks from lanai' and found none. Views are described (ocean, harbor, city) but no indication of fireworks viewing from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly advertise an on-site/resident manager (phrases include 'on-site resident manager', 'on site manager', 'on site mgr'), and 14/20 current MLS listings have the RESMAN checkbox checked. While agent copy/paste is possible, the consistent repeated mentions across many remarks provide moderately strong evidence the building has a resident/on-site manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.