801 South
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
801 South
Building Overview
801 South in Ala Moana-Kakaako, built 2015, concrete construction with ocean and mountain views; amenities include a security guard and covered parking.
About 801 South
801 South is a residential building located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood, completed in 2015. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete and offers ocean and mountain views. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, key building features include a security guard, split air conditioning in units, and covered parking. The building does not allow pets and does not permit short-term rentals according to the available records. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
Additional details such as maintenance fees, specific parking allocations, unit amenities, and onsite management contact are not provided in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all details, including policies and fees, with listing agents or property management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage (e.g., "80% owner occupied") or qualitative statements like "majority owner occupied," but found none. The remarks mention original owners and tenant-occupied units, but do not provide a building-wide owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator counts or phrases like "multiple elevators" or "4 elevators," but found nothing. The listings describe amenities, security, and building age, but do not state the number of elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable inclusion appears in a minority of MLS records (5 of 20), but none of the provided remarks explicitly say cable TV is included in the maintenance fee. Because the checkbox data is inconsistent and there is no corroborating remark language, confidence is only moderate.
Common area electricity is strongly supported at the building level, with 17 of 20 current listings showing OTCOEX. No remarks suggest a change or exception, so this looks like a consistent building expense rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is strong evidence that hot water is not included in the maintenance fee. MLS data shows zero HOTWAT checkboxes and many units list WTRHTR, which points away from building-supplied hot water rather than toward it.
Internet inclusion is repeatedly confirmed across the remarks and MLS records. Several listings explicitly mention internet fees or Wi-Fi amenities, so this appears to be a real building-level feature rather than a checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported at the building level, with 18 of 20 current listings checking SEWER. There are no contrary remarks, making this one of the most reliable fee-included features for the building.
Water inclusion is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 18 of 20 listings showing WATER in the fee inclusions. The remarks do not indicate any change, so this remains a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is clear public-remark support for car-wash facilities, though the MLS checkbox is less common than the amenity items above. Several listings specifically mention a 'car wash area' or 'car washer,' which matches the 4 of 20 MLS listings marked CRWSH. This looks like a real building amenity, just one that is not consistently checked by all agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no substantive evidence in the public remarks that the building has a dog park or dedicated pet area. With only 2 of 20 listings showing DGPRK and no listings describing a dog park, dog run, or pet exercise area, the feature looks unsupported and likely entered in error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is strong, repeated evidence that the building includes a shared meeting/conference/community room amenity. The feature appears in numerous remarks from multiple listings, often alongside recreation room language, suggesting a real building-level amenity rather than an isolated MLS checkbox mistake.
At least 6 separate listing remarks explicitly reference lanais or covered lanais (phrases include 'private lanai', '54 sq ft lanai', and 'covered wrap-around lanai'), indicating building units offer outdoor deck/patio space. Although only 2/20 current MLS checkboxes list PATDEC/COVPAT, the repeated independent agent remarks across multiple listings provide direct evidence that patio/deck amenities exist in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is very strong that the building has a shared recreation room/rec room amenity. Multiple listings across different remarks mention it directly, including phrases like "spacious recreation room," "huge party/rec room," and "recreation area," which looks like consistent agent verification rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is strongly supported by the public remarks. Several listings explicitly advertise surfboard storage, often paired with bike storage, including phrases like 'bike and surfboard storage' and 'surf/bike storage.'
No analysis available
Trash chute is supported by the MLS history and current public remarks. One listing explicitly says the building has a "trash chute" as an amenity, which confirms the feature rather than suggesting a checkbox error. The evidence is narrower than for meeting room, but still strong enough to keep it enabled.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for saltwater pool, salt pool, and similar wording, and found no pool-related mentions at all. The building context also indicates there is no pool, so this feature is not supported.
In-unit laundry is strongly confirmed across the building. Dozens of current remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases like 'in-unit washer and dryer,' 'washer/dryer in unit,' and 'washer/dryer unit were installed in 2025.' The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings/agents and aligns with the historical MLS inclusions data showing 20/20 listings with washer/dryer.
No analysis available
I looked for references to paid community laundry, including coin-op, card-operated, quarters, or laundry fees, and found nothing. The listings consistently describe in-unit laundry instead, so there is no public-remarks evidence that shared laundry is paid.
I searched the public remarks for explicit statements that community laundry is available on every floor, such as 'laundry on each floor' or 'floor-by-floor laundry room,' and found none. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer, which does not support this feature.
Parking is strongly supported across the building. Multiple remarks mention "2 parking stalls," "two unassigned parking stalls," "one covered, unassigned parking stall," and even "parking garage," with no contrary evidence. This appears consistent across many agents and is not just a single isolated mention.
No analysis available
Covered parking is well supported by both MLS data and the public remarks. Several listings explicitly cite "covered parking stalls," "covered, unassigned parking stall," and a "parking garage," confirming that covered parking is available in the building. The evidence is repeated across multiple listings and agents.
The listings consistently refer to unassigned parking stalls, which indicates the stalls are not deeded to the unit. I found no wording like deeded, owned stall, or parking included in deed.
No analysis available
The clearest explicit monthly parking charge in the remarks is $2.04 per month. A separate listing mentions $2.31 for parking, but $2.04 appears more consistently tied to parking maintenance in the public remarks.
Guest parking is clearly available in the building. Numerous remarks mention "ample guest parking" or simply "guest parking," and this is reinforced by the current MLS pattern. The feature appears repeatedly across many listings, making the evidence strong.
Secured entry/security is repeatedly mentioned across listings, often together with parking and garage access. Phrases like "secured entry," "secured building entry," and "24-hour security" indicate a genuine building feature rather than an agent checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or join the waitlist for parking, but found nothing. The remarks discuss parking supply and guest parking, but not any waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for card/fob access language such as keycard entry, fob access, card reader, or electronic access control and found none. The remarks do mention secured entry and 24-hour security, but not card-based access.
Security guard service is strongly supported for this building. Well over 15 listings explicitly mention '24-hour security,' '24 hrs security,' '24/7 secure,' or similar phrasing, across multiple agents and unit types. The consistency of these remarks, along with the MLS SECGUA checkbox appearing in 18/20 listings, makes this a high-confidence building-level amenity.
I looked for explicit references to security patrol, roving security, or patrolled building service and found none. The public remarks only state 24-hour security and secured building features, which do not confirm patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split A/C is strongly confirmed for 801 South Street. Dozens of current remarks from multiple agents explicitly mention "split A/C," "split AC," "NEW split air-conditioners (3)," "split AC in all rooms," and "Mitsubishi split AC units were installed"; this looks consistent across listings rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS history, with 20 of 20 current listings coded CONCRE. The public remarks across many agents focus on amenities and unit upgrades rather than structure, but nothing contradicts the concrete designation. This appears to be stable building-level data rather than copy-paste noise.
Double wall construction is supported by both MLS data and remarks. One listing explicitly says the building is a 'newer (2017) build equipped with ... double walls,' which aligns with the historical 10/20 MLS checkmarks and suggests this is not just random checkbox copying.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no public-remark support for steel frame construction, and the current MLS checkbox evidence is limited to 6 of 20 listings. Because the remarks repeatedly describe the building's amenities, layout, and renovations but never its structural system, the steel-frame coding appears unreliable and should not be treated as confirmed.
Low/insufficient evidence: Only 3 of 20 MLS listings checked 'SLAB' and no public remarks reference 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation'. Given the low historical prevalence and absence of corroborating remarks, slab foundation is not supported by the current remarks dataset.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction has very weak support: only 2 of 20 current listings carry the checkbox, and none of the public remarks describe the building as above-ground constructed. This looks like isolated MLS noise rather than a reliable building characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR allowance language such as legal short-term rental, STR permitted, NUC, TVU, or vacation rental wording, but found none. Since there is also no contrary owner-occupant-only or 30-day-minimum restriction stated in the remarks, this is marked false with moderate confidence due to lack of supporting evidence.
I looked for hotel rental pool indicators such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, hotel-managed units, or rental-program language, but found nothing. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, this must be false.
I searched for wording like 'must participate,' 'mandatory rental program,' or 'cannot opt out,' but there were no such remarks. The listings do not describe any rental-pool obligation, so this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease end, renewed through, or any 4-digit expiration year, but found none. Since the public remarks do not mention land tenure or an expiry date, the value remains unknown.
There is strong repeated public evidence that VA financing is allowed in this building. I found explicit VA approval language in multiple listings, which is sufficient to mark this as true.
The remarks repeatedly and directly confirm full building insurance coverage, including phrases like "Building is 100% insured" and "Building is fully insured." This is consistent across multiple listings and is strong evidence that the HOA provides full walls-in style coverage.
Strong building-level evidence confirms fire sprinklers at 801 South. Multiple current listings explicitly mention the feature, with several agents using clear language such as "fire sprinklers," "fire-sprinklered building," and "equipped with fire sprinklers," which aligns with the historical high-confidence MLS data. The repeated mentions across different listings suggest this is a true building amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
I looked for FLSE-related language such as "fire/life safety evaluation passed," "fire safety certified," or similar inspection-pass wording, but there were no explicit references. Several remarks mention fire sprinklers, but that is not the same as a passed fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are clearly supported across many listings and appear in remarks from multiple agents, not just copied MLS fields. At least 7 of 20 current listings show OCEAN in the view description, and several remarks explicitly say 'sweeping ocean views,' 'partial ocean views,' or 'city, mountain, ocean views.'
Mountain views are consistently confirmed across the listings and are not limited to a single unit or agent. The remarks repeatedly reference 'mountain views' and even 'the Koolau mountains,' matching the current MLS view data and supporting this as a building-level feature.
No analysis available
City views are strongly and repeatedly supported across the listing set. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'city views,' 'city skyline,' 'downtown Honolulu views,' and 'urban island living,' appearing across many different agents and unit types rather than a single copied description. Historical MLS data is also consistent, with 17 of 20 listings showing CITY in the view descriptions.
Strong and repeated evidence in current public remarks for coastline/ocean/harbor views. Many listings include phrases like "ocean views", "harbor views", "ocean, coastline, and city skyline", and "sweeping views of the ocean/coastline/harbor," appearing across multiple agents' listings. This supports high confidence that the building offers coastline views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence the building offers sunrise/morning sun exposure: 2 of 20 current MLS listings include SUNRIS in view_descriptions and at least one public remark explicitly notes "Facing the SE direction," implying eastern/morning sun for that unit. The evidence is limited to a small number of listings, so confidence is moderate.
Sunset views are only modestly supported in the current data: 4 of 20 listings show SUNSET in the MLS view field, but the remarks themselves do not clearly call it out. Because sunset can be tied to orientation and ocean-facing exposure, this remains a plausible building-level feature, though with lower confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for direct views of Friday night fireworks from units or lanais, such as 'watch fireworks from the lanai' or 'fireworks view,' and found no such language. The remarks mention city, mountain, harbor, and ocean views, but not fireworks visibility from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is strong evidence that the building has resident/on-site management. Several current listings explicitly mention 'on site manager,' 'on-site resident manager,' or 'on-site management,' alongside other building-amenity descriptions, supporting a genuine building feature. The evidence is repeated across multiple remarks and is not limited to a single agent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.