801 South
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
801 South
Building Overview
801 South in Ala Moana-Kakaako, built 2015, concrete construction with ocean and mountain views; amenities include a security guard and covered parking.
About 801 South
801 South is a residential building located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood, completed in 2015. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete and offers ocean and mountain views. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, key building features include a security guard, split air conditioning in units, and covered parking. The building does not allow pets and does not permit short-term rentals according to the available records. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
Additional details such as maintenance fees, specific parking allocations, unit amenities, and onsite management contact are not provided in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all details, including policies and fees, with listing agents or property management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy language such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied,' but found no such statements. Because there is no explicit owner-occupancy percentage or descriptive evidence in the remarks, this is treated as absent/unknown from the listing text.
I searched the public remarks for elevator-related language such as 'elevator,' 'elevators,' 'multiple elevators,' or similar phrasing, but found nothing. Since there is no explicit count in the remarks and no current value provided, the number of elevators remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data is mixed: 8 of 20 current listings indicate cable included (historical medium confidence). None of the public remarks explicitly state 'cable included' and remarks focus on internet/Wi‑Fi instead, suggesting inconsistent agent checkbox use. Because some listings still show CABTV checked, the building is flagged as offering cable in fees (implied).
Strong building-level evidence supports common area electricity in the fees. MLS data shows OTCOEX in 17 of 20 listings, and remarks repeatedly reference electricity being submetered or itemized, which is consistent with common-area power included in maintenance. This appears to be a stable building feature rather than a one-off agent note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence that hot water is included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data shows 0 of 20 listings with HOTWAT, and several remarks point toward in-unit hot water setup rather than centralized building hot water. This consistently argues against fee-included hot water.
Internet inclusion is directly supported by both MLS data and remarks. At least 11 of 20 listings show INTSER, and several agents explicitly note “complimentary Wi‑Fi,” “Other Fee of $21 per month is for internet,” or similar wording. This is consistent across multiple listings and appears reliable.
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the maintenance fees at the building level. MLS records show SEWER in 18 of 20 listings, and current remarks do not contradict that pattern. The evidence is strong and consistent.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fees. The MLS data shows WATER in 18 of 20 listings, and the public remarks do not suggest otherwise. This is a stable, high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is clear public-remark support for car-wash facilities, though the MLS checkbox is less common than the amenity items above. Several listings specifically mention a 'car wash area' or 'car washer,' which matches the 4 of 20 MLS listings marked CRWSH. This looks like a real building amenity, just one that is not consistently checked by all agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No substantive evidence for a dog park: only 1 of 20 MLS entries lists DGPRK while none of the public remarks mention a 'dog park', 'dog run' or dedicated pet exercise area. Many listings say 'pet friendly' (policy details) but that does not imply a dog park, so we mark dog_park false with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The meeting room amenity is well-supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Multiple listings mention a 'meeting room' or 'large party meeting room,' and one says 'meeting & recreation areas,' aligning with the 13 of 20 current MLS listings that mark MEEROO. This appears to be a consistent shared building feature.
At least 6 separate listing remarks explicitly reference lanais or covered lanais (phrases include 'private lanai', '54 sq ft lanai', and 'covered wrap-around lanai'), indicating building units offer outdoor deck/patio space. Although only 2/20 current MLS checkboxes list PATDEC/COVPAT, the repeated independent agent remarks across multiple listings provide direct evidence that patio/deck amenities exist in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for a recreation room amenity. Across many current listings, agents describe a 'recreation room,' 'rec room,' 'recreation area,' or 'party/rec room,' and the MLS amenities data already shows 14 of 20 listings marked RECROO. The repeated phrasing across multiple remarks suggests this is a real shared amenity, not a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is clearly supported by the public remarks. Several listings directly advertise surfboard storage, including variations like bike and surfboard storage and surf/bike storage areas.
No analysis available
Trash chute is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 15 of 20 current listings marking TRACHU. Public remarks do not usually spell it out, but the high rate of MLS inclusion makes this a likely genuine shared building feature rather than a stray checkbox. Evidence is strong enough to keep it as present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for saltwater pool, salt pool, saline pool, and similar phrases. There is no public remark indicating the building has a pool at all, so there is no evidence for a saltwater pool.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the remarks: many listings explicitly say 'in-unit washer/dryer,' 'in-unit laundry,' or 'washer/dryer in unit.' The historical MLS pattern is equally strong, with 20/20 listings showing washer/dryer inclusions, which suggests this is a consistent building feature rather than isolated agent copy-paste.
No analysis available
I looked for coin laundry, quarters, card-operated machines, laundry fees, or other paid shared laundry references. The remarks consistently mention in-unit washer/dryer instead, so there is no evidence that community laundry is paid.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like laundry on each floor, laundry room on every floor, and floor-by-floor laundry. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence of shared laundry facilities on every floor.
Parking is clearly offered building-wide. The remarks repeatedly mention “2 parking stalls,” “two unassigned parking stalls,” and “parking garage,” across numerous listings, which is consistent with the MLS data showing parking on every record. This appears strong and repeated across multiple agents, not a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Covered parking is well supported. Multiple listings explicitly describe “parking garage” and “covered parking stall,” while several others note “covered and unassigned parking stall.” The evidence is consistent across many remarks and aligns with the MLS covered-parking indicators.
The parking is repeatedly described as unassigned, which is inconsistent with deeded or owned parking. I did not find any remark indicating the stalls are deeded with the unit.
No analysis available
The most consistent public remarks identify the monthly parking cost as $2.04. One remark mentions a later update to $2.31, but $2.04 is the repeated figure across listings, so it is the best-supported value.
Guest parking is a building feature. Remarks across many listings mention “guest parking,” “ample guest parking,” and one listing specifies “30 guest parking,” showing this is not incidental. The repeated language across multiple agents supports a genuine shared amenity.
Secured entry/security for the parking/building is strongly supported. Listings repeatedly describe the property as “secured,” with explicit mentions of “secured entry” and “secured building entry,” plus 24-hour security. The remarks are consistent across numerous listings and reinforce the MLS security indicator.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist, waiting list, or join-the-waitlist language and found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence that the building uses a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for key card access, fob access, card reader, and keycard entry. The remarks confirm secured entry and security, but they do not explicitly state a card-based access system.
Strong, consistent evidence that 801 South has security guard service. Multiple current remarks explicitly mention '24-hour security' or '24 hrs security' across many listings, alongside 'secured entry' and 'secure high-rise' language. This appears to be a stable building-level amenity, reinforced by both the MLS checkbox data and repeated agent remarks.
I searched for patrol-specific language such as security patrol, roving security, and patrolled building. The remarks mention 24-hour security and on-site management, but nothing indicates a patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is clearly present in this building. It is mentioned in numerous remarks across many listings by different agents, with phrases like 'split A/C throughout,' 'split AC in every room,' and 'Mitsubishi split AC units were installed in both the living room and bedroom in 2020.' The evidence is strong and consistent, and some listings even describe newer installations, reinforcing that the building offers ductless mini-split systems.
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS history: 19 of 20 current listings identify the building as CONCRE. None of the provided public remarks explicitly dispute that material, and the repeated listings appear consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste anomaly.
Confirmed in remarks: Public remarks explicitly state 'double walls' (e.g., 'newer (2017) build equipped with ... double walls'), supporting the historical MLS indication (9 of 20). Multiple listings reference consistent modern construction practices, making the presence of double-wall construction likely across the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Low/ambiguous evidence: 6 of 20 MLS listings check 'STEFRA', but public remarks contain no mentions of 'steel frame' or 'steel frame construction'. This appears inconsistent and likely reflects copy/paste or checkbox variability rather than clear building-level steel-frame construction.
Low/insufficient evidence: Only 3 of 20 MLS listings checked 'SLAB' and no public remarks reference 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation'. Given the low historical prevalence and absence of corroborating remarks, slab foundation is not supported by the current remarks dataset.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental, STR, TVU, NUC, vacation rental, and minimum-stay wording, but found no references. With no public remarks supporting STR allowance, this is treated as not evidenced and therefore false by default.
I looked for hotel pool, managed-by-hotel, rental program, or branded rental-pool language and found none. Since STR permission is not evidenced in the remarks, hotel-pool participation is also not supported.
I searched for mandatory rental-program language such as required participation, cannot opt out, or must be in the pool, and found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence that owners must participate in any hotel rental pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, renewal, or extended-through dates, but found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence to extract a lease expiry year.
Multiple remarks explicitly state that the building is VA approved, which is direct evidence for VA loan eligibility. This is strong public-remarks confirmation, so the feature is marked true.
The remarks repeatedly and explicitly state that the building is fully insured, including phrases like 'Building is 100% insured' and 'Building is fully insured.' This is strong, consistent evidence across multiple listings, so the feature is confidently true.
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings supports fire sprinklers as a building feature. Historical MLS data shows FIRSPR in 16 of 20 listings, and current remarks repeatedly state "fire sprinklers" or describe the property as a "fire-sprinklered building," indicating this is not just a one-off agent checkbox.
I looked for direct phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' 'FLSE passed,' 'fire safety certified,' or 'passed fire inspection.' The remarks mention fire sprinklers, but that is not the same as a passed fire/life safety evaluation, so there is no evidence to mark this true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Building-level ocean views are frequently advertised: at least 10 listings mention ocean/coastline views with phrases like "ocean views", "partial ocean and city views", and "sweeping views of the ocean". Evidence appears across multiple agents' remarks and aligns with prior high-confidence historical data, indicating some units in the building do offer ocean views.
Strong evidence the building offers mountain views: 11 of 20 current MLS listings include MOUNTA in view_descriptions and numerous public remarks explicitly state "mountain" or "Koolau mountains" (e.g., "Panoramic views... the Koolau mountains"). Mentions appear across multiple agent listings rather than a single isolated entry, supporting high confidence that some units have mountain views.
No analysis available
City views are strongly supported across the current listings: well over 10 remarks explicitly mention "city views," "downtown views," "city skyline," or similar phrasing. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and unit types, making this a high-confidence building feature.
Strong and repeated evidence in current public remarks for coastline/ocean/harbor views. Many listings include phrases like "ocean views", "harbor views", "ocean, coastline, and city skyline", and "sweeping views of the ocean/coastline/harbor," appearing across multiple agents' listings. This supports high confidence that the building offers coastline views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence the building offers sunrise/morning sun exposure: 2 of 20 current MLS listings include SUNRIS in view_descriptions and at least one public remark explicitly notes "Facing the SE direction," implying eastern/morning sun for that unit. The evidence is limited to a small number of listings, so confidence is moderate.
Historical data previously showed strong indication of sunset/western exposure, but the current set of public remarks contains no explicit 'sunset' or 'western exposure' phrases. Because historical confidence was high and there is no overwhelming new evidence to overturn it, the feature is kept as available to some units but with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for remarks about seeing Friday night fireworks from the building, unit, or lanai. The listings mention city, ocean, harbor, and mountain views, but nothing states fireworks are visible from units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is solid evidence the building has resident/on-site management. Historical MLS data includes RESMAN in 11 of 20 listings, and multiple current remarks explicitly mention "on-site management," "on-site manager," and "an on-site resident manager," which suggests consistent building-level management rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.