444 Nahua
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
444 Nahua
Building Overview
444 Nahua in Waikiki — 22-floor concrete building with pool and fitness center.
About 444 Nahua
Based on MLS data, 444 Nahua is a 22-floor, 135-unit concrete residential building located in Central Waikiki. The building was constructed in 1976 and offers three elevators servicing the tower.
According to available records, on-site amenities include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, and on-site staff such as a resident manager and security guard. Units are served by split and window air-conditioning systems.
MLS data indicate covered, assigned parking is available with additional guest parking. Pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The building is managed by Hawaiiana Management Company, Ltd. This summary is based on MLS information; buyers should verify all details with the management, HOA, or listing agent.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for direct owner-occupancy statements such as a percentage or wording like "owner occupied," but found none. The remarks include multiple mentions of tenant-occupied units and investment suitability, so there is no basis to change the current 17% value.
I looked for explicit elevator counts or wording like "multiple elevators," but the public remarks only confirm that the building has elevator access. Since the current value already exists and there is no remark-based count to override it, I kept 3 with low confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No remarks describe central air being provided; agents emphasize tradewinds and in-unit features. With ACCEN rarely checked (2/20) and no supporting remarks, central AC is not indicated as a building-included maintenance item.
Strong, consistent evidence across the listings. About 19 of 20 MLS records include CABTV, and several public remarks explicitly state "basic cable" or "cable TV" is included in maintenance fees, which looks like genuine building-level information rather than a one-off agent typo.
Moderate evidence supports common-area electricity being included. Roughly 10 of 20 MLS records flag OTCOEX, and several remarks say the maintenance fee is "all-inclusive" or covers "most of the utilities," but the public remarks do not directly call out hall/elevator/common power.
No analysis available
This feature is essentially unanimous. All 20 current MLS records include ELECTR, and numerous remarks explicitly mention electricity is covered in the fee, so this is highly reliable building-level information.
No analysis available
Evidence is moderate rather than explicit. Around 12 of 20 MLS records include HOTWAT, but the remarks mostly refer to "all utilities" without specifically naming hot water, so this appears to be a real but inconsistently reported inclusion.
Strong, consistent evidence across the listings. About 19 of 20 MLS records include internet service, and multiple remarks explicitly say "internet" or "internet service" is included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
Very solid evidence. Roughly 18 of 20 MLS records include sewer, and several remarks directly mention sewer as part of the maintenance fee, making this a reliable building feature.
Unanimous support across the data. All 20 current MLS records mark water included, and public remarks repeatedly confirm it, so this is highly reliable.
Very strong evidence shows the building has shared BBQ/grilling amenities. Numerous listings mention 'BBQ area,' 'BBQ grills,' and 'Outdoor Kitchen/BBQ Grills,' confirming this is a common rooftop amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence across many listings supports an exercise room/fitness center. Remarks repeatedly reference 'exercise room,' 'fitness center,' 'gym,' and 'workout room,' suggesting this is a standard shared amenity rather than a one-off unit feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck access is well supported by the listing remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention a "covered lanai," "large covered lanai," "oversized covered lanai," "spacious lanai," and rooftop "recreation deck" / "terrace" / "outdoor lounge" areas. The evidence appears consistent across many agents and reads like standard building amenity copy rather than a one-off claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building clearly offers a sauna, with multiple listings describing 'sauna,' sometimes paired with pool, fitness room, and rooftop deck amenities. The repeated remarks across different listings make this a reliable shared feature.
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard storage-related wording such as 'surfboard storage,' 'board storage,' or similar amenity descriptions. The remarks focus on pool, sauna, gym, BBQ areas, parking, and views, with no storage amenity for surfboards mentioned. This feature is not supported.
No analysis available
Trash chute appears to be a building amenity based primarily on MLS checkbox consistency rather than remark frequency. While only one public remark explicitly says 'trash chute,' the high rate of current listings checking TRACHU supports including it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that 444 Nahua has a pool. The remarks mention it in many listings, including phrases like “rooftop pool,” “swimming pool,” and “resort-style rooftop amenities include pool,” which appears across multiple agents and reads like standard amenity descriptions rather than isolated copy errors. Historical MLS data also showed pool amenities in 19 of 20 recent listings, reinforcing high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for salt-water pool terminology such as 'saltwater pool,' 'salt pool,' and 'saline pool.' The remarks only describe a rooftop pool and even mention solar heating and resurfacing, but nothing indicates salt-water treatment. So this feature is not supported.
Strong building-level evidence that some units have in-unit laundry. Across the provided remarks, well over a dozen listings explicitly mention "in-unit washer/dryer," "washer/dryer within unit," or similar phrasing, suggesting this is not a one-off copy-paste error. The current MLS data also aligns, with all 20 listings including washer/dryer in inclusions.
No analysis available
I looked for remarks describing paid community laundry such as coin-op, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. The listings repeatedly mention in-unit washer/dryer instead, and there is no evidence of a paid shared laundry room. This feature is not supported by the remarks.
I searched for public remarks indicating community laundry on every floor, including phrases like 'laundry on each floor' and 'laundry room on every floor.' The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer, which does not support this feature. With no building-wide floor laundry references, this is not supported.
No analysis available
Assigned/reserved parking is well supported across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention "assigned parking," "one assigned parking stall," "reserved parking stall," and similar phrasing, consistent with the strong MLS pattern (18 of 20 current listings).
Covered parking appears to be a core building feature. All current MLS records indicate covered/garage parking, and public remarks repeatedly confirm it with phrases like "covered parking stall," "gated garage," and "secured covered parking."
I searched for wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included with the deed and found none. The listings consistently describe assigned or reserved stalls, which suggests parking is available but not explicitly deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of a parking fee, monthly parking charge, or rental cost for parking and found nothing. The remarks note various parking stalls, but none specify an additional parking price.
Guest parking has moderate support from the MLS data, with 10 of 20 current listings flagging it. However, the public remarks do not clearly mention guest or visitor parking, so this feature is supported mainly by the checkbox data rather than repeated text confirmation.
Secured entry is strongly supported across the listings. Remarks repeatedly describe the property as a "secured building," mention "secured gated parking," and note 24-hour security/keyed elevator access, aligning with the current MLS secured-entry flags.
Tandem parking is clearly present in some units. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "2 tandem parking stalls" and "reserved parking stall (Tandem)," while the MLS also flags tandem in 3 of 20 current listings, confirming availability for at least some buyers.
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist or parking waiting list references and found none. The listings instead describe individual assigned or reserved stalls, with no indication of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit card or fob access language like keycard entry, card reader, or fob access. The remarks describe the building as secure and mention keyed elevator access, but that is not the same as confirmed card/fob security. No direct evidence was found.
Strong, consistent evidence that the building provides on-site security: roughly 16 listings' remarks mention security or an on-site/resident manager (e.g., '24 hours Security with Res, Mgr. on site', 'secured building with resident manager', 'offers security and an on-site resident manager'). These references appear across multiple agents and listings (not just a single copy/paste), supporting a high-confidence inclusion of building security service.
I searched for any reference to patrol service, roving security, or a patrolled building. The remarks mention security and 24-hour security, but not patrols. Without an explicit patrol reference, this feature is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 1 listing explicitly mentions split AC with the phrase '2 split AC units,' while current MLS data shows ACSPL checked in 2 of 20 listings. The rest of the remarks are silent on AC type, suggesting this is a unit-level feature that is present in some units but not broadly described across all agents.
14 of 20 current listings include ACWIUN in MLS inclusions, indicating many units likely have window air-conditioning units, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'window AC', 'window unit', or 'wall AC'. Because the support comes mostly from MLS checkboxes rather than descriptive agent remarks, this is included with moderate confidence (implied rather than explicitly described).
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS pattern, with 18 of 20 current listings checked as CONCRE. The public remarks are varied and mostly focus on unit features and amenities, but nothing suggests a different building type. This looks like consistent building-level reporting rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no public-remarks evidence for masonry/stucco construction across the listings reviewed. Only 4 of 20 current MLS records show MASSTU, which is not enough to establish the feature for the building, especially when agents are likely copying construction fields. This is best treated as not supported.
No analysis available
Concrete slab foundation is not supported by the public remarks, and only 1 of 20 current listings shows SLAB in construction_materials. With no explicit mention of slab construction and no historical support, this looks like an isolated MLS entry rather than a reliable building characteristic. Buyers should not assume slab construction from the current evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 20 current MLS listings mark ABOGRO, but none of the public remarks (0 of ~30 entries) describe 'above ground' construction or materials. Historical confidence was Medium; the MLS checkbox presence on a minority of listings provides moderate but not strong evidence and may reflect inconsistent agent checkbox usage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks clearly support short-term rental use with a 30-day minimum rental allowance. That indicates STR is allowed under the building rules, at least for monthly or longer stays.
I searched for hotel pool, hotel rental program, or brand-managed rental-pool references and found none. The building is described as a normal condo with standard amenities, not as a hotel-pool property.
I looked for wording like mandatory pool participation, required rental program, or cannot opt out and found nothing. Since there is no hotel-pool program mentioned at all, mandatory participation is also false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for ground lease, leasehold, or lease expiry language and found none. The listings instead say the property is fee simple, which means this lease-expiry field is not applicable.
I searched the remarks for VA approval, VA loans accepted, and similar language, but found no references. The only financing-related note was seller financing (Vendee), which does not indicate VA approval, so the feature is treated as false.
I looked for insurance-related phrases that would suggest HOA walls-in or full building coverage, but none were found in the public remarks. Because there is no explicit evidence of full coverage, this is left false with low confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for direct fire/life safety compliance language and found none. The remarks mention building improvement assessments and a fire alarm project, but nothing that indicates the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation, so this remains unconfirmed and set to false with low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for mountain views. About 10+ current remarks mention mountain views directly, including phrases like 'surrounding mountain range,' 'Ko'olau Mountain range,' and 'panoramic mountain views.' This appears consistent across multiple agents and unit types, not a one-off MLS checkbox.
No analysis available
Very strong evidence for city views across the building. Current listings repeatedly mention 'city skyline,' 'city lights at night,' and 'Honolulu City Lights,' with several different agents describing these views from higher-floor units. This is consistent with the high historical MLS frequency.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers golf course views in multiple units. Listings repeatedly reference 'Ala Wai Golf Course,' 'golf course views,' and combined canal/golf course outlooks from higher floors and corner units. This looks like genuine building-level inventory, not copy-paste noise.
Excellent evidence for marina/canal-style views. Numerous current remarks mention 'Ala Wai Canal,' 'spectacular water views of the Ala Wai Canal,' and canal-facing lanais, making this one of the strongest confirmed building features. The pattern is broad and repeated across many listings.
Sunrise views are supported by multiple current remarks, though less frequently than mountain/city/canal views. Listings mention 'morning sunrise,' 'east-facing Ala Wai Canal,' and 'sunrise sipping coffee,' indicating at least some units have eastern/sunrise exposure. Evidence is solid but not as ubiquitous as the other view types.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks directly confirm fireworks views, specifically stating that Friday night fireworks can be seen from the roof. This satisfies the requirement that fireworks are visible from the building/units, not merely nearby.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is repeatedly described as having a resident manager or on-site manager in multiple current remarks, including phrases like "on-site resident manager," "resident manager," "24 hours security with Res. Mgr. on site," and "on-site building manager." This appears across many listings from different agents, so it does not look like a one-off copy/paste error. The current MLS amenities data also shows RESMAN in 9 of 20 listings, supporting the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.