444 Nahua
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
444 Nahua
Building Overview
444 Nahua in Waikiki — 22-floor concrete building with pool and fitness center.
About 444 Nahua
Based on MLS data, 444 Nahua is a 22-floor, 135-unit concrete residential building located in Central Waikiki. The building was constructed in 1976 and offers three elevators servicing the tower.
According to available records, on-site amenities include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, and on-site staff such as a resident manager and security guard. Units are served by split and window air-conditioning systems.
MLS data indicate covered, assigned parking is available with additional guest parking. Pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The building is managed by Hawaiiana Management Company, Ltd. This summary is based on MLS information; buyers should verify all details with the management, HOA, or listing agent.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for explicit owner-occupancy statements (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied') and found none. Therefore the current value of 17.00 is retained but with low confidence because there is no corroborating evidence in the listings.
Remarks confirm the building has elevators (mentions keyed elevator access and an elevator modernization assessment) but never state how many. Per rules, when remarks are silent on a numeric count we retain the existing value. No explicit numeric evidence found in remarks to change the current value.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No remarks describe central air being provided; agents emphasize tradewinds and in-unit features. With ACCEN rarely checked (2/20) and no supporting remarks, central AC is not indicated as a building-included maintenance item.
Strong, consistent evidence: 18 of 20 current MLS records list cable (CABTV) as included and the public remarks repeatedly state phrases such as 'basic cable' or 'basic cable TV' included in the maintenance fee. The language appears across multiple listings/agents (likely copy-pasted MLS remarks), providing high confidence that cable is included in the building fees.
Moderate evidence: 10 of 20 MLS records flag common/other electricity. Multiple agent remarks state 'maintenance fee includes electricity' or 'maintenance fee includes all utilities,' implying common area electricity is covered, but language is not always explicit whether it is only common-area or also in-unit electric.
No analysis available
Very strong evidence: 19 of 20 MLS entries include electricity (ELECTR) in association_fee_includes and the public remarks contain multiple explicit lines such as 'Maintenance fee includes electricity' and 'Monthly fees include electricity.' The consistency across listings and agent remarks supports high confidence that electricity is included.
No analysis available
Moderate evidence: 13 of 20 MLS records list HOTWAT. Public remarks frequently say 'maintenance fee includes all utilities' in some listings, but explicit mention of hot water is uncommon in the remarks provided. Given MLS checkbox prevalence but limited explicit mentions, hot water is included with moderate confidence.
Strong evidence: 18 of 20 current MLS records list internet (INTSER) as included and the public remarks include explicit statements like 'Maintenance fee includes... internet' and 'internet service' across multiple listings. Repeated mentions across listings indicate this is a building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
Consistent evidence: 18 of 20 MLS records include sewer (SEWER) and agent/public remarks explicitly list 'sewer' as part of the maintenance fees. The repeated listing of sewer across multiple MLS entries supports high confidence that sewer is included.
Very strong, unanimous evidence: all 20 current MLS records mark water included and the public remarks repeatedly state 'water' is included in fees (e.g., 'Maintenance fee includes... water'). The unanimity across MLS records and consistent agent remarks yields very high confidence that water is included.
Very strong evidence: about 18 of the MLS listings were checked for BBQ and many public remarks here explicitly reference "BBQ area", "BBQ grills", "outdoor kitchen/BBQ grills", or "BBQ dining area" on the rooftop. Multiple agents consistently advertise shared grilling facilities, supporting inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence: roughly 17 of the current listings previously flagged the building with an exercise room and many public remarks in this dataset explicitly state "exercise room", "fitness room", or "fitness center". Multiple agent listings describe rooftop or building gym facilities, indicating the amenity is broadly advertised and available to buyers.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building offers patios/decks: well over 20 listings' remarks explicitly reference a lanai (often described as covered, oversized, or enclosed) and building-level rooftop recreation decks with pool/BBQ seating. Representative phrases include "covered lanai," "large covered lanai," "enclosed lanai increases the living area," and "rooftop recreation deck"—the mentions appear across multiple agents and listings, indicating the feature is real and widely available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderately strong evidence: ~13 of the current listings mention a sauna (quotes: "sauna", "spa/hot tub"). Multiple agent remarks list the sauna as a building amenity, supporting inclusion.
No analysis available
Searched for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', and 'surf storage' in the public remarks. Amenities focus on pool, BBQ, sauna, gym, and parking; there is no evidence of dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Mixed evidence: MLS amenities data indicates trash chute is commonly checked (≈18/20), but only one public remark in this corpus explicitly states "trash chute" while most agent remarks omit it. Because checkbox data is widespread but public confirmations are sparse, the feature is included with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that the building has a pool: 19 of 20 recent MLS listings list pool amenities and many public remarks explicitly state 'rooftop pool' or 'swimming pool' (e.g., 'rooftop pool', 'swimming pool', 'rooftop recreation deck with panoramic ...'). Mentions appear across multiple agent listings rather than isolated to a single posting, indicating the amenity is a building feature.
No analysis available
Searched for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline' in the public remarks. The pool is described (rooftop, solar heating) but there is no indication it is a saltwater pool.
Strong evidence that some units have in-unit laundry: historical MLS inclusions indicated 19 of 20 listings included washer/dryer, and numerous current remarks explicitly state phrases like 'in-unit washer/dryer', 'washer and dryer in-unit', and 'stacked washer/dryer'. This is consistent across multiple agent remarks rather than a single outlier, indicating the building does offer units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
Searched for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'paid laundry', 'card operated', and 'quarters'. Public remarks mention in-unit laundry but contain no evidence of paid community laundry.
Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry'. The public remarks consistently describe in-unit washers/dryers and do not reference community laundry on every floor.
No analysis available
High confidence that the building offers assigned parking: historical MLS data shows 18/20 listings with ASSIGN and at least a dozen public remarks explicitly say 'assigned' or 'one assigned parking stall' (e.g., 'Assigned covered parking', 'one-assigned parking'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks, indicating assigned stalls are a building-level offering.
Very strong evidence of covered parking: all MLS entries flagged covered/garage and nearly every public remark mentions covered parking (examples: 'one covered parking stall', 'covered and secured parking stall', 'covered lanai' plus 'covered parking stall in a gated garage'). Multiple agents consistently describe covered/gated parking, supporting building-wide covered parking.
I searched for explicit language such as 'deeded parking' or 'owned parking' and found none. Multiple listings reference assigned, covered, reserved, preferred, or tandem stalls, which implies assigned parking but does not show it is deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'monthly parking fee', 'parking charge', or 'parking rental' and found no mention. Because there is no explicit parking fee stated in the remarks, the monthly parking fee is unknown from public remarks.
Evidence for guest parking is weak and inconsistent: MLS checkbox data is mixed (about 9/20 listings with GUEST) but none of the public remarks mention guest/visitor parking. Given the lack of any remark confirming visitor parking and the likelihood of checkbox copy/paste, guest parking is unlikely to be a reliable building feature without owner/manager verification.
Good evidence that parking/entry is secured: about 11–12 listings and several remarks use phrases like 'secure building', 'gated garage', 'gated parking entry', and 'secured covered parking'. Evidence comes from multiple agent remarks (not just one listing) though not every listing mentions it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any reference to a parking waitlist or waiting list process and found none. Absence of mention suggests no advertised waitlist in the public remarks.
No analysis available
Searched for 'key card', 'fob', 'card reader', and 'keycard entry'. Listings describe secured entry and keyed elevator access but provide no explicit evidence of card/fob-based electronic access.
Strong evidence the building provides on-site security: at least ~10 listings' remarks explicitly reference security or an on-site/resident manager, with key phrases including "24 hours Security with Res, Mgr. on site", "secured building", and "on-site resident manager." This aligns with historical MLS checkbox data (SECGUA set on 13/20 listings) and appears consistent across multiple agent remarks rather than isolated copy/paste.
Looked for explicit mentions of 'security patrol', 'roving security', or 'patrol service'. While the exact phrase 'patrol' is not used, multiple listings state '24 hours security' and 'security' with an on-site resident manager, which reasonably indicates active security coverage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
13 of 20 current listings list ACWIUN (window units) in the MLS inclusions and historical data showed similar medium support (~11/20). None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'window AC', 'window unit', or 'wall AC'—agents repeatedly highlight tradewinds/natural cooling—so the evidence is MLS-driven and moderately strong but not corroborated by remarks across multiple agents.
18 of 20 current MLS listings mark the building construction as 'CONCRE', consistent with prior high-confidence data (previously 19/20). None of the public remarks explicitly describe a different construction type or state a recent change, so the repeated MLS entries across multiple listings—while possibly copy/pasted—provide strong evidence the building is concrete.
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 20 current MLS listings include MASSTU in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks mention masonry or stucco. This suggests some listings/units are tagged as masonry & stucco (or some agents selected the checkbox), but evidence is limited to a minority of MLS entries and no confirming language in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 20 current MLS listings mark ABOGRO, but none of the public remarks (0 of ~30 entries) describe 'above ground' construction or materials. Historical confidence was Medium; the MLS checkbox presence on a minority of listings provides moderate but not strong evidence and may reflect inconsistent agent checkbox usage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings explicitly state a 30-day minimum rental and some explicitly say 'Short term rentals not allowed.' This provides strong evidence that short-term rentals (transient/vacation rentals) are not permitted per the public remarks.
Because the remarks explicitly prohibit short-term rentals, there is no basis in the public remarks for a hotel rental pool program. I searched for 'hotel rental pool' and related phrases and found none.
With short-term rentals explicitly disallowed in the remarks, mandatory participation in a hotel rental pool is not applicable. I also searched for terms like 'mandatory hotel pool' or 'required to participate' and found none.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks explicitly describe the property as 'Fee simple', so a leasehold expiry year is not applicable. I searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', and 'leasehold expiring' and found no lease expiry year.
I searched the public remarks for phrases indicating VA loan approval (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA financing', 'VA loans accepted'). No listings referenced VA financing. With no evidence in the remarks, VA approval cannot be confirmed.
Searched remarks for terms such as 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'full insurance', and related phrases. Nothing in the remarks indicates the HOA provides full (walls-in) insurance, so this is marked false with medium confidence due to absence of evidence.
No analysis available
Searched remarks for phrases like 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'passed fire inspection', etc. Found only references to a fire alarm project and assessments; there is no language indicating the building has passed an FLSE. In absence of an explicit pass and with no existing true flag, marked false with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level mountain views are supported by historical High confidence and multiple current remarks. Listings repeatedly cite 'Ko'olau/Koolau range', 'mountain views', and 'Koolau range' from lanais and the rooftop, indicating several units and common areas offer mountain outlooks (multiple agent remarks across listings). Evidence is consistent across different agents rather than a single copy/paste.
No analysis available
City views are well supported by historical High confidence and multiple current remarks citing 'city skyline', 'city lights', and 'surrounding cityscape'. Several unit descriptions and rooftop amenity descriptions mention city views, indicating the building offers units with city vistas.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence building offers golf-course views: many listing remarks explicitly reference 'Ala Wai Golf Course' or 'golf course views' from units and the lanai. Historical MLS records already rated golf-course views highly and the current agent remarks corroborate that across multiple listings.
Marina/canal views are strongly supported: historical High confidence plus many current remarks explicitly state 'Ala Wai Canal' or 'canal views' from lanais and units. Multiple listings reference views of the Ala Wai Canal/golf course, indicating building-level access to canal/harbor vistas.
Sunrise views are supported by historical High confidence and several current remarks that explicitly mention 'sunrise' and 'morning sunrise.' Multiple listings describe enjoying the morning sunrise from the lanai or unit, indicating some units in the building provide eastern/sunrise exposure.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks explicitly state that Friday night fireworks are viewable from the roof, which directly supports that the building has fireworks views from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple current listing remarks (consistent with prior MLS checkbox data: 8/20 listings) explicitly state the building has an on-site/resident manager — key phrases include “resident manager,” “on-site building manager,” and “Res. Mgr. on site” (also referenced alongside 24-hour security in some remarks). Evidence is strong across multiple agent remarks and aligns with historical MLS entries, so include resident_manager = true with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.