441 Lewers

None of the five listings mention when the building was built, and no year_built data was provided from MLS. The building's construction year cannot be determined from the available information.

Remarks explicitly say '10 is max height', clarifying that the building has 10 floors. This is direct evidence of the total floor count.

The total unit count is not mentioned in any of the five listings. Therefore, the number of units in the building cannot be determined from the available data.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Since the building lacks central AC and no listing shows AC included in fees, central AC costs are not part of the HOA. This feature is clearly absent.

Cable TV is not mentioned among included utilities. This indicates cable service is likely paid separately by residents.

Agents explicitly state that maintenance covers common areas, and MLS shows common area electricity included. This indicates common area costs are part of the HOA fees.

No listings reference co-op taxes or cooperative ownership. This confirms that cooperative taxes are not included in fees.

All MLS records and remarks agree that electricity is covered by the maintenance fee. This is a well-established building feature.

Included utilities listed are electricity, hot water, common areas, and sewer, but not gas. This shows gas service, if any, is not included in the fees.

Both MLS data and agent remarks confirm that hot water is included in the maintenance fees. Individual water heaters are not listed, reinforcing that hot water is a building-supplied utility.

Internet or Wi-Fi service is not mentioned as part of the HOA inclusions. This suggests residents pay for internet separately.

Even though some units have canal views, no documentation indicates that marina or dock fees are included in HOA dues. Therefore, marina fees are not part of the maintenance fee.

All listings show sewer in the HOA includes, and remarks from different agents confirm that maintenance fees cover sewer service. Evidence is consistent and explicit across the building.

Every listing shows water in the included utilities, and multiple remarks explicitly confirm hot water is included. This establishes that water is covered by the maintenance fee.

Marketing for the building focuses on location and lanais rather than on-site grilling facilities. The absence of BBQ references across listings suggests there is no BBQ amenity.

Despite the walkable location being emphasized, no listing advertises dedicated bicycle storage. This suggests there is no formal bike storage amenity.

Although the building overlooks the canal, no listing mentions docks, slips, or marina access. This strongly suggests there is no boat dock amenity.

No listing mentions a car wash station or similar facility. The consistent absence indicates there is no car wash amenity.

The building appears to have limited common amenities and no clubhouse is advertised. This indicates there is no clubhouse facility.

There is no mention of front desk or concierge services, only management and elevator security. This indicates the building does not offer concierge service.

While one pet is allowed, no listing refers to any dedicated dog park or pet exercise area on-site. The consistent omission indicates there is no dog park.

Security is via keyed elevator rather than a door attendant. No listing advertises a doorman or lobby attendant, which would be a key selling point if present.

Fitness facilities are not advertised despite the building's central location, which would otherwise be a selling point. This indicates there is no exercise room.

No listing hints at any limo or house car service, which would typically be highlighted in Waikiki if present. The absence across all marketing implies there is no limo service.

The building appears to have minimal common amenities; no listing cites a meeting or community room. This indicates there is no dedicated meeting room.

Several listings highlight lanais/balconies, including 'enclosed lanai', 'extra large lanai/balcony', and 'spacious covered lanais'. This indicates that units in the building generally offer patio/deck-style outdoor spaces.

While the location is walkable, there is no indication of a dedicated jogging or walking path on the property. Multiple agents omit this feature, suggesting it does not exist.

This is a small Waikiki studio building aimed at adults and vacationers, and no agent mentions a playground. It is safe to conclude there is no playground amenity.

Listings reference lanais/balconies but never a yard or fenced ground space, which is typical for a small mid-rise Waikiki building. This strongly indicates there is no private yard amenity.

No agent mentions a putting green, which would be a notable recreational feature. This strongly suggests there is no putting green.

Common amenities described are minimal, with no reference to a recreation deck or area. This suggests there is no designated recreation area.

Marketing focuses on the units and location, with no reference to any rec room. This suggests there is no dedicated recreation room in the building.

The building is praised for proximity to dining but not for having its own restaurant. This shows there is no in-building restaurant.

Agents emphasize lanais and balconies but never reference any shared rooftop amenity. This strongly suggests there is no rooftop deck or rooftop facility.

No listing highlights a sauna, which is typically marketed if present. This indicates there is no sauna amenity.

None of the listings advertise separate storage space, which is often mentioned when available. This suggests there are no dedicated storage units for residents.

No analysis available

The compact mid-rise building is in a dense urban area and no listing advertises tennis facilities. This strongly suggests there is no tennis court.

Multiple agents checked trash chute in the amenities, suggesting a building-level chute system. The recurring MLS code across listings supports this feature.

Parking is waitlisted, self-parking only, with no mention of valet. This strongly indicates there is no valet service.

Security is provided via access to the building rather than walls or gates. The absence of any mention of gated or fenced grounds indicates there is no notable perimeter wall/fence amenity.

The amenity descriptions never reference any whirlpool or spa facility. Given its marketing appeal, its omission implies there is no whirlpool amenity.

Given the marketing focus on location and lanais, a pool would be highlighted if present. Its complete absence from MLS and remarks indicates there is no pool.

Because the building does not have a pool at all, it necessarily does not offer a heated pool. Heated pool amenities are absent.

No analysis available

No unit is advertised with in-unit laundry, which would be a strong selling point in Waikiki. This indicates that in-unit washers/dryers are not generally available in the building.

MLS codes community laundry for every listing, and no units are marketed with private laundry. This establishes that laundry is provided via shared facilities.

No analysis available

No analysis available

While units are sold without deeded stalls, residents can obtain building parking via a paid waitlist. This confirms that the building offers access to parking, albeit on a rental basis.

Parking is described as optional and waitlisted, not as a specific assigned stall tied to the unit. This indicates there is no assigned parking included with units.

Available parking is described generically and is not attached to units, and MLS codes do not show covered or garage parking. Given the lack of any reference, covered parking cannot be confirmed and is treated as absent.

No analysis available

Parking is described only in terms of availability and cost, not EV infrastructure. This strongly indicates there are no EV charging stations.

The building offers parking on a paid basis, with a clearly stated cost of $200 per month. This fee is directly tied to obtaining a parking stall in the building. The explicit dollar amount and frequency support very high confidence.

Agents do not advertise any guest parking, which they typically would if available in Waikiki. This suggests the building does not offer dedicated guest parking.

Security is highlighted for the elevator, not for any parking structure. With no MLS codes or remarks about secured parking entry, this amenity cannot be confirmed and is treated as absent.

Parking is described only as being available on a waitlist, with no detail suggesting back-to-back or tandem configurations. Therefore tandem parking is very unlikely.

Parking is described as available via a waitlist for a monthly fee, with no reference to attendants or valet. This strongly suggests there is no valet parking.

Parking is not automatically included; instead, residents can obtain parking by joining a waitlist. The phrase "short waitlist" clearly confirms the existence of a parking waitlist system. Multiple references to the same parking arrangement support very high confidence.

Remarks clearly mention that the elevator uses key security. This matches the definition of a keyed/secured elevator system.

No analysis available

Security is via building access controls rather than on-site guards. The consistent omission of 24/7 security or guards indicates this service is not provided.

No analysis available

Security is described in terms of access control rather than surveillance systems. The lack of any mention of cameras suggests video security is not a highlighted feature.

Cooling is via window units, and central AC is never mentioned in MLS or remarks. This indicates the building does not have central air conditioning.

Cooling is described as window A/C in at least one unit and central AC is not present. No evidence suggests any split AC systems in the building.

Cooling is provided by window air conditioning units in at least some apartments. This indicates the building allows and has window AC installed in multiple units.

Every listing codes the building as concrete construction. This uniform MLS data strongly supports that the structure is concrete-built.

Agents never select double-wall construction, instead indicating concrete-based construction. This makes double-wall framing unlikely for this building.

Agents consistently select other construction types (concrete, masonry/stucco, above ground) and never hollow tile. This makes hollow tile construction very unlikely.

At least one MLS entry specifically codes the building as masonry/stucco. Combined with concrete coding, this supports that the exterior is masonry/stucco over a concrete structure.

Agents do not check steel frame on any listing and instead identify other materials. This indicates the building is not steel frame construction.

MLS does not identify a concrete slab construction code for this building. While a slab may exist structurally, it is not coded or marketed as such, so the 'slab' construction flag is treated as false.

No analysis available

Agents do not indicate wood-frame construction on any listing. The building appears to be a concrete/masonry mid-rise rather than wood frame.

MLS coding identifies the structure as above-ground for at least one listing. This supports that the building is classified as above-ground construction.

No listing or MLS entry describes brick or brick-and-mortar construction. The building is consistently described and coded as other construction types, so brick construction is very unlikely.

No agent identifies single-wall construction, which is uncommon for this Waikiki concrete mid-rise type. This indicates the building is not single-wall constructed.

The building is described as grandfathered for Hotel Resort Use with no current restrictions on daily use in the governing documents, and listings highlight renting on a monthly or even sub-30-day basis. Another remark calls it a "popular vacation rental building." These repeated statements make it clear that short-term rentals are allowed, leading to very high confidence.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Multiple agents clearly market their units as fee simple, indicating that fee-simple ownership exists in this building. At least 3 of 5 recent listings are explicitly fee simple, so buyers can find FS units here.

At least one unit is marketed as leasehold with a lease expiring 9/2038, while others are fee simple. This shows the building contains both LH and FS units, with at least 1 of 5 recent listings being leasehold.

One of the units in the building is described as leasehold with the lease expiring in September 2038. This strongly suggests that the building’s leasehold interest, where applicable, runs through 2038. Because the year is explicitly provided, confidence is high.

No analysis available

The remark "100% hurricane insured" indicates the building carries full hurricane insurance, which is typically arranged by the HOA. While it does not explicitly say "walls-in," the phrasing implies robust, building-wide insurance. Because the wording is strong but not perfectly aligned with 'walls-in,' confidence is moderate.

No agent references fire sprinklers, which are often highlighted in marketing if present. This suggests the building does not have a fire sprinkler system, or at least not one promoted as an amenity.

No analysis available

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Views described are 'mountain/canal' and city-adjacent; ocean views are never claimed. This indicates that ocean-view units are not a notable feature of this building.

Multiple listings emphasize mountain views, including from the Ko'olau range. This confirms that some units enjoy mountain vistas.

Agents highlight mountain and canal views but not Diamond Head. The absence of this commonly advertised view suggests Diamond Head views are not a characteristic feature.

MLS entries record city views for some units, which is consistent with a mid-rise in central Waikiki. This indicates that certain units enjoy city/urban outlooks.

The building is inland in Waikiki and views mentioned are canal and mountain. This suggests coastline views are not a feature of this property.

There is no mention of landscaped or garden outlooks in any listing. Garden views do not appear to be a noted feature of this property.

Views are described as mountain and canal, not over any golf course. This indicates golf course views are not present.

Listings highlight views over the canal (coded in MLS as marina/canal). This confirms that some units offer marina/canal-type views.

Agents do not refer to sunrise or morning sun as a selling point. This suggests sunrise views are not a distinct feature of this building.

Agents do not promote sunset views, which are typically highlighted if notable. This indicates that sunset views are not a distinguishing feature here.

Views promoted are mountain, canal, and city, with no reference to cemeteries. This indicates cemetery views are not a characteristic or selling point.

No analysis available

No analysis available

The building expressly allows one pet per unit with registration. Multiple agents emphasize this in remarks, confirming pets are allowed with some limitation.

Multiple MLS entries and remarks reference a building manager, consistent with an on-site or resident manager. This supports the presence of a resident manager for the property.

Although units can legally be rented on a short-term basis, there is no evidence of hotel-style operations or a hotel management program. Under the strict definition used here, the building is not treated as a condotel.

The tenure is described as fee simple or leasehold, not shares in a cooperative. The absence of coop tax coding confirms this is not a cooperative building.