417 Namahana
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
417 Namahana
Building Overview
417 Namahana in Waikiki — 4-floor concrete building (16 units) in West Waikiki; built 1953. Assigned parking; no pets or short-term rentals.
About 417 Namahana
417 Namahana is a low-rise condominium located in the Waikiki neighborhood, in the West Waikiki location zone. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1953, has four floors and a total of 16 units, and is of concrete construction.
Key features include a small unit count and concrete construction typical of mid-century buildings. The property is managed by Hawaiiana Management Company, Ltd. No on-site amenities beyond those specified in MLS data are listed in the available records.
Additional details reported in MLS: parking is assigned, pets are not allowed, and short-term rentals are not allowed. Monthly maintenance or association fees and other specific rules were not provided in the MLS data. Based on MLS data — buyers should verify all details, policies and fees with the management company or association prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks state that short-term rentals are not allowed but do not provide an owner-occupancy percentage. The current value of 40.00% is retained because there is no evidence in the remarks to confirm or deny it.
The remarks describe a vintage building and a 3rd-floor unit but do not mention elevators or accessibility equipment. The current value of 0 is retained because there is no explicit evidence to confirm or deny it.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
With no central AC indicated at all, it is very unlikely that central air conditioning is included in the HOA fees. The data strongly suggest this is not an included service.
No analysis available
The current MLS association data explicitly lists OTCOEX (other common area electricity) as an inclusion. This strongly supports that common-area power is included in the maintenance fee for the building.
No cooperative tax inclusion appears in the HOA data. This supports the conclusion that cooperative taxes are not included and that the building is not structured as a co-op.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No HOA inclusions tied to marina or boat slips are indicated for the listing. The narrative also lacks mentions of marina fees being covered, so this appears to be excluded.
Both current listings (2/2) explicitly include sewer in the association fee inclusions. This is consistent across listings and confirms that sewer service is included in the building's maintenance fees.
One of two current listings lists water as included in the association fees, while neither public remark explicitly mentions water. The feature is therefore plausible but less strongly confirmed than sewer and may reflect inconsistent agent data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no indication of a dock, marina, or boat slip access on the property. Given the location description and absence of marina codes, a boat dock is almost certainly not present.
No analysis available
No clubhouse is listed among building amenities. The remarks focus on location and security, not on a shared club house facility.
There is no concierge or staffed front desk mentioned for the building. The security description focuses solely on keyed access, which strongly suggests no concierge service.
The available information does not list a dog park among the building’s amenities. There is no indication of a dedicated pet area on the property.
The building is described as having keyed entry rather than attended entry. The lack of any doorman-related language indicates there is no doorman service.
The listing does not advertise any on-site exercise room or gym. Fitness amenities are typically emphasized if available, so their absence suggests none exist.
The amenities do not indicate any limousine or courtesy car service for the building. Remarks also lack any reference to such a feature, which is something agents typically highlight if present.
The building’s amenities do not list a meeting or community room. The remarks also do not reference any such shared indoor space.
One of two listings indicates a patio/deck amenity through the MLS checkbox, but 0 of 2 remarks mention or describe the feature. This appears weakly supported and could reflect an unverified checkbox rather than consistent building-level evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Nothing in the listing suggests private yard space, which is uncommon for central Waikiki condos. The absence of any yard-related amenity supports that this is not available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listing highlights access to Waikiki dining but not any restaurant within the complex. The absence of the RESTAU code suggests no in-building restaurant facility.
There is no indication of a shared rooftop area in the amenity codes or narrative. A rooftop deck is typically a highlighted selling point when present, so it likely does not exist here.
The MLS data for the building omit any sauna or steam room amenity. With no textual mention either, this feature appears not to be offered.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building amenity list is silent on tennis courts, which are typically highlighted when available. This strongly suggests there are no tennis courts on-site.
No analysis available
The listing does not mention valet parking or service, and no relevant MLS codes appear. This strongly indicates valet is not offered.
No analysis available
0 of 2 current listings mention a whirlpool or related feature; both remarks focus on general building conveniences and do not describe a spa amenity. Although WHIRLP appears in 1 of 2 MLS amenity records, the lack of supporting remarks and prior Medium-confidence absence suggest this is likely a copy-paste or checkbox error.
The single listing shows no indication of any pool amenity. Given that pools are a strong selling point and usually featured prominently, this suggests the building does not have a pool.
Since no pool is indicated, a heated pool is effectively ruled out. The absence of any heated-pool-specific codes further confirms this.
No analysis available
The unit is described as using community laundry facilities, with no indication of private washer/dryer hookups. This suggests in-unit laundry is not a typical or advertised feature in the building.
Community laundry is confirmed across the available evidence: 2/2 current listings include the COMLAU amenity code, and 1 listing explicitly mentions "community laundry facilities." This is consistent with the previously high-confidence building record and is strong evidence that the building offers shared laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
For the sampled unit, the MLS explicitly indicates no parking stall. With no evidence of shared or optional parking in the description, the building is treated as not offering parking, though this could vary for other units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not describe any parking or indicate that a parking stall is deeded with the unit. Deeded parking is therefore not indicated.
No EV charging or electric vehicle infrastructure is referenced in the listing. With no amenity code or narrative support, EV parking is probably not provided.
The remarks do not provide any parking fee information. The monthly parking cost is unknown from the available remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listing does not mention valet service, which is a major amenity when offered. The lack of relevant codes or remarks strongly indicates no valet parking.
The remarks do not discuss parking availability or a waitlist system. A parking waitlist is therefore not indicated.
Security is provided via keyed entry at the premises, but there is no mention of elevator key or fob access. This suggests there is no special keyed elevator security system.
No analysis available
Security is described as keyed entry rather than staffed security. No guard or 24-hour security language appears, so the building likely lacks a security guard service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listing does not indicate central air conditioning, and instead highlights trade winds for cooling. Central AC is a strongly marketed feature when present, so it is likely not available here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is coded as concrete construction in the MLS data. This provides strong evidence that the primary structural material is concrete.
Neither listing's public remarks refers to double-wall or two-wall construction. DOUWAL appears in 1 of 2 current MLS records, but this isolated checkbox/code entry is not confirmed by remarks and conflicts with the prior medium-confidence assessment.
The construction data point to concrete rather than hollow-tile construction. With no hollow-tile code present, this material is unlikely to be primary.
No public remarks mention masonry or stucco. The feature appears in 1 of 2 current MLS construction records via MASSTU, but the partial and unsupported coding is moderate rather than strong evidence.
The building is described as concrete without a steel frame designation. This suggests steel framing is not a primary structural component.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Neither of the two public remarks mentions wood-frame construction. Historical data strongly indicated concrete construction rather than wood frame, while only 1 of 2 current listings contains the WOOFRA code; this conflicting single-record entry is not supported by descriptive remarks.
No analysis available
The MLS construction data specify concrete and make no reference to brick. This is strong evidence that brick is not a primary construction material.
The building is described as concrete rather than single-wall wood construction. This effectively rules out single-wall as a construction type.
The listing directly prohibits short-term rentals in the complex. This is strong evidence that STR is not allowed.
The remarks state that short-term rentals are not allowed. Because hotel rental pool participation requires STR eligibility, the building cannot be classified as participating in such a pool.
The direct STR prohibition rules out mandatory hotel rental pool participation. No remarks mention any required hotel rental program.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks contain no specific lease expiration year or renewal information. The lease expiry is therefore unknown from the available public remarks.
The remarks do not state that the building is VA loan approved or that VA financing is accepted. With no supporting mention, VA approval is treated as not indicated.
The listing discusses the building's condition and amenities but does not address HOA insurance coverage. With no current verified value or explicit insurance statement, the feature is set to false with medium-low confidence.
No fire sprinkler system is indicated in the MLS amenity list. Sprinklers are often noted when present, so their absence suggests the building may not be sprinklered.
The remarks mention keyed entry and general security but provide no information about fire or life safety evaluations. With no current verified value and no explicit mention, the feature is set to false with medium-low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS view description for the current unit explicitly lists a garden view. This confirms that garden views are available in this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset views or related phrases, while one listing explicitly reports NONE for views. The evidence across the available listings supports omitting this feature rather than treating it as a building offering.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building restricts short-term rentals and is not labeled as a condo-hotel. These points strongly indicate it does not operate as a condotel.
There are no co-op tax inclusions or cooperative-ownership references. This strongly supports that the building is not a cooperative.
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.