411 Kaiolu Inc

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

I looked for concrete ownership breakdown language like "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or a specific percentage, and none was provided. The remarks only mention that the unit may be suitable for an owner-occupant, which is not enough to change the current 44% value.

I searched the public remarks for elevator-related language such as "elevator," "elevators," "multiple elevators," or a specific count, but found nothing. The current value of 1 is kept because there is no evidence to confirm or deny it.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

0/8 MLS records list ACCEN in association_fee_includes and units instead have individual split AC systems.

Cable appears to be included at the building level. Multiple remarks explicitly mention the monthly fee for 'bulk cable/internet,' which aligns with the MLS history showing CABTV in 9/10 listings. This looks consistent across several listings and agents, not like a one-off copy/paste error.

There is limited but real MLS evidence that common-area electricity is included: 3 of 9 listings have OTCOEX checked. However, none of the provided remarks explicitly describe common electric or building power, so this is weaker and may reflect incomplete agent input rather than a fully documented amenity.

Despite being a co-op, 0/8 MLS records include COOTAX in association_fee_includes and one remark quotes a separate property tax amount.

Electricity is not listed in association_fee_includes for any of the 8 MLS records.

0/8 MLS association_fee_includes entries list GAS and remarks never mention gas utilities.

Hot water is strongly supported by the MLS data for this building. Current records show HOTWAT in 9/10 listings, and there are no WTRHTR flags that would suggest the building does not provide hot water. The public remarks do not contradict this pattern.

Internet is very likely included in the monthly building fee. Several remarks explicitly say the fee 'covers internet monthly' or refer to 'bulk cable/internet,' matching the MLS history showing INTSER in 7/10 listings. The evidence is repeated across multiple listings and appears building-level.

0/8 MLS association_fee_includes fields mention MARINA and there is no talk of marina access or boat slips.

Sewer appears to be included in the association fee. The MLS data is consistently favorable, with SEWER present in 8/10 current listings. No current public remarks contradict this building-level inclusion.

Water is strongly supported as a building expense included in the maintenance fee. Current MLS data shows WATER in 9/10 listings, which is a strong and consistent signal. No remarks suggest otherwise, so this appears to be a reliable building-level feature.

0/8 MLS amenities show BBQ and remarks never mention barbecue or grill areas.

0/8 MLS entries list BSTORAG and no remarks mention bicycle storage or bike racks.

No analysis available

0/8 MLS amenities include CRWSH and no remarks mention a car wash area.

0/8 MLS amenities list CLUHOU and remarks mention only pool, lobby, and laundry as common spaces.

No MLS records list concierge and remarks describe a small 'boutique' co-op with no front-desk services.

Even though the building is pet friendly, 0/8 MLS amenities list DGPRK and no remarks mention a dog park or pet run.

There is no mention of a doorman or lobby attendant in remarks, and 0/8 MLS amenities have DOORMA.

No MLS amenities list EXEROO and remarks never mention a gym or fitness center.

No analysis available

0/8 MLS amenities list MEEROO and no remarks describe a meeting or conference room.

Strong evidence that the building offers patio/deck-type outdoor space. At least 6 of the provided remarks explicitly mention a lanai or covered lanai, including 'double lanai,' 'large covered lanai,' and 'spacious covered lanai.' The consistency across multiple listings suggests a genuine building feature rather than copy-paste MLS error.

0/8 MLS amenities list WAJOPA and remarks do not reference jogging or walking paths on-site.

No analysis available

All outdoor space references are to lanais or poolside, with no mention of yards, and 0/8 MLS entries list PRIYAR.

0/8 MLS entries list PUTGRE and no remarks mention golf or a putting area.

0/8 MLS records include RECARE and remarks focus on the pool and lobby only.

0/8 MLS amenities have RECROO and remarks focus only on the pool and lobby, not any rec rooms.

The remarks mention proximity to many restaurants but no on-site dining, and 0/8 MLS amenities list RESTAU.

0/8 MLS records include ROOFDCK and remarks do not mention any rooftop deck or rooftop amenities.

No MLS amenities list SAUNA and remarks focus only on the pool and lobby as amenities.

1/8 MLS listings show STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG in amenities and one unit_features entry has STORAG.

No analysis available

No MLS amenities list TENCOU and remarks never mention tennis facilities.

1/8 MLS records list TRACHU in amenities, and none contradict it.

0/8 MLS amenities list VALET and no remarks mention valet service.

No analysis available

0/8 MLS amenities have WHIRLP and remarks only mention a standard swimming pool.

Pool is strongly confirmed for this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention it in the remarks, including "sunny pool," "poolside," "relaxing swimming pool," and "very nicely done pool and lobby renovations," which aligns with the MLS amenities being checked in all 10/10 listings. This looks like a stable shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste mistake.

0/8 MLS entries show HEAPOO/HEATED and remarks always describe a 'sunny' or 'relaxing' pool but never 'heated'.

No analysis available

At least two remarks state 'laundry inside the unit' or 'in-unit washer/dryer', and 2/8 MLS inclusions list WASHER/DRYER.

Community laundry is strongly supported. At least 3 listings explicitly mention it, including phrases like 'community laundry' and 'spacious community laundry room,' and the current remarks are consistent across multiple agents. This appears to be a stable building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Parking is clearly supported for this building. Across the provided remarks, at least 5 listings explicitly mention parking with phrases such as "1 parking stall," "1 parking," and "large covered parking stall." The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and aligns with the current MLS parking_features showing parking available in some units.

Assigned parking is supported, though not as widely as general parking. One current listing explicitly says "1 ASSIGNED PARKING," and the MLS history shows ASSIGN in 4 of 10 listings, indicating this is a real feature for some units. The rest of the remarks reinforce that parking is a building amenity, but only some listings make the assigned status explicit.

One remark explicitly notes a 'large covered parking stall' and 1/8 MLS parking_features show COVERE.

I looked for deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed and found none. The remarks instead indicate assigned parking and a lease-rent charge for the stall, which points away from deeded ownership.

No MLS parking_features show EVCHRG and no remarks mention EV charging or Tesla/electric stations.

The monthly parking cost is explicitly stated in the remarks as parking stall lease rent. This is the clearest parking fee mentioned and should be used as the parking_fee value.

0/8 MLS parking_features list GUEST and remarks never mention guest or visitor parking.

1/8 MLS parking_features have SECENT and one remark describes the building as 'SECURE, boutique, Coop building'.

No listings mention tandem stalls, and 0/8 MLS records have any TANDEM-related parking features.

No MLS parking_features show VALET and the small co-op building is not described as having attended parking.

I searched for phrases like parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or joining a waitlist for parking and found nothing. The remarks discuss parking availability and nearby parking, but not a waitlist system.

0/8 MLS amenities list ELEVAT and remarks mention a 'SECURE' building but do not describe keyed/fob elevator access.

No analysis available

0/8 MLS records include SECGUA and no remarks mention security guards or 24‑hour security personnel.

No analysis available

0/8 MLS amenities list SECSYS and remarks only generally describe the building as 'SECURE' without citing cameras.

0/8 MLS entries show ACCEN/CENAC and several units instead have split AC, indicating decentralized systems.

Multiple remarks explicitly state 'split AC', and 3/8 MLS inclusions have ACSPL.

Remarks repeatedly mention split AC but never window AC, and 0/8 MLS inclusions have ACWIUN.

The building is very likely concrete construction. Historical MLS data was previously unanimous (8/8 records, now 9/10 listings still show CONCRE), which is strong evidence even though the public remarks do not explicitly mention the structure. The current remarks are consistent with a mid-rise Waikiki condo/co-op building and do not suggest a material change to construction type.

No public remarks mention "double wall," "double-wall construction," or "two walls" across the listings reviewed. With only 1/9 current MLS entries showing DOUWAL and no corroborating language in remarks, this looks like an isolated checkbox entry rather than a verified building feature.

2/8 MLS construction_materials include HOLTIL alongside concrete.

1/8 MLS records list MASSTU alongside concrete construction materials.

0/8 MLS construction_materials list STEFRA and all entries emphasize concrete/hollow tile.

No remarks explicitly mention "concrete slab" or a "solid concrete foundation." The MLS data is mixed at 3/9, which is not strong enough on its own to confirm a building-level slab foundation without any supporting agent remarks.

No analysis available

All 8 MLS records list concrete and none list wood frame construction.

1/8 MLS records list ABOGRO and the property is a multi-story Waikiki tower rather than below-grade construction.

0/8 MLS construction_materials have BRICK and all emphasize concrete and related materials.

0/8 MLS records have SINWAL and the building is consistently described as concrete construction.

I looked for STR-permitted language such as legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or explicit short-term rental approval and found none. There is also no indication that short-term rentals are allowed in this building from the public remarks.

I searched for hotel pool indicators such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, Ritz/Trump/Hilton pool, and found none. Since there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, this must also be false.

I looked for language like mandatory hotel pool, must participate, or cannot opt out and found nothing. With no evidence of STR allowance or a hotel pool program, mandatory participation is not supported.

All remarks describe the units as leasehold with leases expiring in 2054 and 0/8 MLS entries show FS land tenure.

All remarks clearly state the property is leasehold, with leases expiring in 2054 and long land leases discussed in detail.

The lease expiry year is directly and repeatedly stated in the public remarks. No later extension or renewed expiry year appears, so 2054 is the best-supported value.

I searched the remarks for VA-approved, VA financing, or VA loans accepted and found no such language. The only financing note suggests cash preference and general financing questions, which is not evidence of VA eligibility.

I searched the remarks for insurance-related phrases such as "fully insured," "full insurance," "walls-in coverage," or similar HOA insurance wording, but found no references. There is no evidence in the public remarks to confirm full building insurance coverage.

0/8 MLS entries have FIRSPR and remarks never reference sprinklers or fire suppression upgrades.

I looked for explicit references to fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or similar inspection language, and found none. Because the remarks do not address this at all, the status remains unknown in the listing remarks and is treated as not verified.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

0/8 MLS view_descriptions include OCEAN and remarks never mention an ocean or makai view.

4 of 9 current MLS records include MOUNTA in the view description, while 2 of 9 explicitly list NONE. The public remarks do not mention mountain views, so this is supported by the MLS view field rather than agent narrative, but it still suggests some units in the building offer mountain/mauka views.

0/8 MLS view_descriptions list DIAHEA and remarks never mention Diamond Head.

4/8 MLS records list CITY in view_descriptions and none list view as NONE.

0/8 MLS records show COASTL in views and remarks never mention coastline or shoreline views.

Across the provided remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention a garden, courtyard, or landscaped view. The only specific views described are pool, mountain, and one unit's lanai view, which does not support a building-level garden-view feature. Despite 2/10 current MLS records showing GARDEN, the narrative evidence points to copy-paste or inaccurate MLS checkboxes rather than a real feature.

0/8 MLS view_descriptions include GOLCOU and no remarks mention golf course views.

1/8 MLS records list MARCAN in view_descriptions and no listings have NONE for view.

0/8 MLS records list sunrise views and no remarks mention sunrise or explicit eastern exposure.

1/8 MLS view_descriptions include SUNSET and none list view as NONE.

0/8 MLS records include CEMETA and no remarks reference cemetery views.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Multiple remarks explicitly say 'pet friendly!' and 'pet-friendly (subject to Board approval)'.

0/8 MLS amenities list RESMAN and no remarks refer to an on-site or resident manager.

The building is repeatedly described as a 'Co-op boutique building' with no mention of hotel operations or condotel programs, and 0/8 MLS records have CONDOT.

No analysis available