411 Kaiolu Inc

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

I looked for phrases such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or any other ownership breakdown, but the remarks only include generic owner-occupant language and do not quantify the building's occupancy mix. The current value of 44.0 is retained with low confidence because there is no direct evidence to change it.

I searched the public remarks for elevator-related language such as "elevator," "elevators," "multiple elevators," and specific counts, but found nothing. Per the current building context, the value remains 1 with low confidence because there is no remark evidence to confirm or deny it.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

0/8 MLS records list ACCEN in association_fee_includes and units instead have individual split AC systems.

Cable service appears to be included for this building. 8 of 9 MLS listings currently show CABTV, and the remarks repeatedly note '$41.20 for bulk cable/internet' or 'additional fee ... covers internet monthly,' which strongly supports the inclusion. This looks consistent across multiple listings rather than a one-off agent checkbox.

There is limited but real MLS evidence that common-area electricity is included: 3 of 9 listings have OTCOEX checked. However, none of the provided remarks explicitly describe common electric or building power, so this is weaker and may reflect incomplete agent input rather than a fully documented amenity.

Despite being a co-op, 0/8 MLS records include COOTAX in association_fee_includes and one remark quotes a separate property tax amount.

Electricity is not listed in association_fee_includes for any of the 8 MLS records.

0/8 MLS association_fee_includes entries list GAS and remarks never mention gas utilities.

Hot water inclusion is strongly supported by the MLS pattern. 8 of 9 listings include HOTWAT, and there are no WTRHTR indicators that would suggest in-unit water heaters instead of building-supplied hot water. The public remarks do not contradict this, so the feature remains high confidence.

6/8 MLS records include INTSER in association_fee_includes, with no conflicting information.

0/8 MLS association_fee_includes fields mention MARINA and there is no talk of marina access or boat slips.

Sewer is very likely included in the monthly fee. 7 of 9 listings currently show SEWER in association_fee_includes, which is a strong building-level signal. The remarks are silent on sewer, but the MLS frequency is high enough to support inclusion.

Water appears to be included for this building. 8 of 9 listings currently include WATER in association_fee_includes, which is a very strong MLS signal. The public remarks do not mention a separate water bill, and there is no evidence suggesting this is a copy-paste error.

0/8 MLS amenities show BBQ and remarks never mention barbecue or grill areas.

0/8 MLS entries list BSTORAG and no remarks mention bicycle storage or bike racks.

No analysis available

0/8 MLS amenities include CRWSH and no remarks mention a car wash area.

0/8 MLS amenities list CLUHOU and remarks mention only pool, lobby, and laundry as common spaces.

No MLS records list concierge and remarks describe a small 'boutique' co-op with no front-desk services.

Even though the building is pet friendly, 0/8 MLS amenities list DGPRK and no remarks mention a dog park or pet run.

There is no mention of a doorman or lobby attendant in remarks, and 0/8 MLS amenities have DOORMA.

No MLS amenities list EXEROO and remarks never mention a gym or fitness center.

No analysis available

0/8 MLS amenities list MEEROO and no remarks describe a meeting or conference room.

Strong evidence that this building offers patio/deck-type outdoor space. Multiple listings mention a "large covered lanai," "double lanai," "spacious covered lanai," and a "97sf lanai," across several remarks from different listings/agents, which aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS amenity data. This looks consistent rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

0/8 MLS amenities list WAJOPA and remarks do not reference jogging or walking paths on-site.

No analysis available

All outdoor space references are to lanais or poolside, with no mention of yards, and 0/8 MLS entries list PRIYAR.

0/8 MLS entries list PUTGRE and no remarks mention golf or a putting area.

0/8 MLS records include RECARE and remarks focus on the pool and lobby only.

0/8 MLS amenities have RECROO and remarks focus only on the pool and lobby, not any rec rooms.

The remarks mention proximity to many restaurants but no on-site dining, and 0/8 MLS amenities list RESTAU.

0/8 MLS records include ROOFDCK and remarks do not mention any rooftop deck or rooftop amenities.

No MLS amenities list SAUNA and remarks focus only on the pool and lobby as amenities.

1/8 MLS listings show STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG in amenities and one unit_features entry has STORAG.

No analysis available

No MLS amenities list TENCOU and remarks never mention tennis facilities.

1/8 MLS records list TRACHU in amenities, and none contradict it.

0/8 MLS amenities list VALET and no remarks mention valet service.

No analysis available

0/8 MLS amenities have WHIRLP and remarks only mention a standard swimming pool.

Pool is strongly confirmed across the listings: 4+ remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases like "sunny pool," "poolside," "very nicely done pool renovations," and "relaxing swimming pool." The MLS amenity data is consistent with this, so this appears to be a stable building feature rather than copy-paste error.

0/8 MLS entries show HEAPOO/HEATED and remarks always describe a 'sunny' or 'relaxing' pool but never 'heated'.

No analysis available

At least two remarks state 'laundry inside the unit' or 'in-unit washer/dryer', and 2/8 MLS inclusions list WASHER/DRYER.

Community laundry is strongly supported across the listings: 3+ remarks explicitly mention 'community laundry,' including one that says 'spacious community laundry room.' The MLS checkbox is consistently present across all recent records, so this appears to be a stable building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Parking is strongly supported by multiple listings and appears to be a building-level amenity available to some units. At least 5 remarks explicitly mention parking or a parking stall, including '1 parking,' '1 parking stall,' and 'large covered parking stall,' while one listing notes nearby parking may be rented. This is consistent with the MLS history showing parking features in 5/9 records rather than a single copy-paste outlier.

Assigned parking is supported, though less broadly than general parking. One current listing explicitly states '1 ASSIGNED PARKING,' and the MLS history shows ASSIGN in 3/9 records, suggesting this is a real building feature rather than an MLS mistake. The evidence points to assigned parking being available for some units, but not necessarily all.

One remark explicitly notes a 'large covered parking stall' and 1/8 MLS parking_features show COVERE.

I looked for language such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and found none. The repeated reference to a leased parking stall strongly suggests the parking is not deeded.

No MLS parking_features show EVCHRG and no remarks mention EV charging or Tesla/electric stations.

The remarks directly identify $24.96 per month as the parking stall lease rent. This is the clearest parking-related monthly cost mentioned, so it is used as the parking fee.

0/8 MLS parking_features list GUEST and remarks never mention guest or visitor parking.

1/8 MLS parking_features have SECENT and one remark describes the building as 'SECURE, boutique, Coop building'.

No listings mention tandem stalls, and 0/8 MLS records have any TANDEM-related parking features.

No MLS parking_features show VALET and the small co-op building is not described as having attended parking.

I searched for "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," and similar wording, but found nothing. The remarks discuss existing parking and even suggest nearby parking as an option, but do not describe a waitlist system.

0/8 MLS amenities list ELEVAT and remarks mention a 'SECURE' building but do not describe keyed/fob elevator access.

No analysis available

0/8 MLS records include SECGUA and no remarks mention security guards or 24‑hour security personnel.

No analysis available

0/8 MLS amenities list SECSYS and remarks only generally describe the building as 'SECURE' without citing cameras.

0/8 MLS entries show ACCEN/CENAC and several units instead have split AC, indicating decentralized systems.

Multiple remarks explicitly state 'split AC', and 3/8 MLS inclusions have ACSPL.

Remarks repeatedly mention split AC but never window AC, and 0/8 MLS inclusions have ACWIUN.

All 8 MLS records list CONCRE in construction_materials.

No public remarks mention "double wall," "double-wall construction," or "two walls" across the listings reviewed. With only 1/9 current MLS entries showing DOUWAL and no corroborating language in remarks, this looks like an isolated checkbox entry rather than a verified building feature.

2/8 MLS construction_materials include HOLTIL alongside concrete.

1/8 MLS records list MASSTU alongside concrete construction materials.

0/8 MLS construction_materials list STEFRA and all entries emphasize concrete/hollow tile.

No remarks explicitly mention "concrete slab" or a "solid concrete foundation." The MLS data is mixed at 3/9, which is not strong enough on its own to confirm a building-level slab foundation without any supporting agent remarks.

No analysis available

All 8 MLS records list concrete and none list wood frame construction.

1/8 MLS records list ABOGRO and the property is a multi-story Waikiki tower rather than below-grade construction.

0/8 MLS construction_materials have BRICK and all emphasize concrete and related materials.

0/8 MLS records have SINWAL and the building is consistently described as concrete construction.

I looked for explicit STR-friendly terms such as "short-term rental allowed," "vacation rental allowed," "NUC," and "TVU," but found none. The building is described as a leasehold co-op/boutique building, with no public remarks indicating STRs are allowed.

I searched for hotel-pool indicators like "hotel rental pool," "hotel program," and named hotel operations, but found none. With no evidence of STR allowance either, hotel-pool participation is not supported.

I looked for language such as "mandatory pool," "required to participate," or "must be in rental program," but found nothing. There is also no indication of any hotel rental pool, so mandatory participation is not supported.

All remarks describe the units as leasehold with leases expiring in 2054 and 0/8 MLS entries show FS land tenure.

All remarks clearly state the property is leasehold, with leases expiring in 2054 and long land leases discussed in detail.

The leasehold expiry year is explicitly stated several times as 2054. No later renewal or extension year appears in the remarks, so 2054 is the best-supported value.

I searched the remarks for phrases like "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted," but found none. The listings instead discuss cash preference and general financing options, with no VA-specific support indicated.

I searched for terms like "fully insured," "full insurance," "walls-in coverage," and similar insurance descriptions, but found no relevant remark. Since there is no current value and no supporting remark evidence, this is marked false with low-to-moderate confidence.

0/8 MLS entries have FIRSPR and remarks never reference sprinklers or fire suppression upgrades.

I looked for explicit references to fire/life safety evaluation pass status, FLSE, life safety compliance, and fire inspection language, but none appeared in the remarks. With no current value provided, this is treated as false at low-to-moderate confidence based on absence of evidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

0/8 MLS view_descriptions include OCEAN and remarks never mention an ocean or makai view.

4 of 9 current MLS records include MOUNTA in the view description, while 2 of 9 explicitly list NONE. The public remarks do not mention mountain views, so this is supported by the MLS view field rather than agent narrative, but it still suggests some units in the building offer mountain/mauka views.

0/8 MLS view_descriptions list DIAHEA and remarks never mention Diamond Head.

4/8 MLS records list CITY in view_descriptions and none list view as NONE.

0/8 MLS records show COASTL in views and remarks never mention coastline or shoreline views.

0/8 MLS view_descriptions list GARDEN and remarks only mention a view of the pool from one lanai.

0/8 MLS view_descriptions include GOLCOU and no remarks mention golf course views.

1/8 MLS records list MARCAN in view_descriptions and no listings have NONE for view.

0/8 MLS records list sunrise views and no remarks mention sunrise or explicit eastern exposure.

1/8 MLS view_descriptions include SUNSET and none list view as NONE.

0/8 MLS records include CEMETA and no remarks reference cemetery views.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Multiple remarks explicitly say 'pet friendly!' and 'pet-friendly (subject to Board approval)'.

0/8 MLS amenities list RESMAN and no remarks refer to an on-site or resident manager.

The building is repeatedly described as a 'Co-op boutique building' with no mention of hotel operations or condotel programs, and 0/8 MLS records have CONDOT.

No analysis available