3003 Kalakaua
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
3003 Kalakaua
Building Overview
3003 Kalakaua in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis; built 1962, concrete construction. Pets allowed; short-term rentals not permitted.
About 3003 Kalakaua
3003 Kalakaua is a residential building located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1962 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data available for this listing.
Key policy details recorded in the MLS include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The listing does not identify a management company; the MLS entry lists the management company as unknown.
Parking, maintenance fees, amenity details, and other operational information are not included in the provided MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify building size, parking, fees, amenity availability, and management details with the listing agent or condominium association prior to making purchase decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit percentages or phrases like 'owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', or numeric values and found none. Without an explicit statement, and per rules preventing guessing, the owner-occupancy percentage remains unknown.
Public remarks clearly indicate the building has elevator access (mentions of 'keyed elevator' and 'semi-private elevator foyer for each unit'), however no explicit number of elevators (e.g., '4 elevators') is stated in the remarks. Per rules, cannot infer a numeric count without an explicit number, so the exact number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
CABTV is checked in all 7 current listings, though none of the public remarks (0/7) explicitly mention 'cable' or 'cable included'. The consistency across multiple agents/listings suggests the association fee likely includes cable, but absence of explicit remark confirmation lowers confidence to an implied level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
HOTWAT appears in only 3 of 7 listings while WTRHTR (unit water heaters) is listed in 6 of 7, and none of the public remarks (0/7) mention hot water-in-fees. The presence of unit water heaters across most listings is a strong indicator that hot water is not provided by the building/HOA, so fee_inc_hot_water is set to false.
MLS checkbox INTSER appears in 5 of 6 listings, but none of the public remarks mention 'internet included' or 'wifi included.' The MLS flags consistently indicate internet included, but lack of explicit remarks suggests moderate confidence and potential copy/paste.
No analysis available
SEWER is checked in all 7 current listings and historically has been consistently marked across MLS entries. No public remarks (0/7) reference sewer, but the consistent agent checkbox usage across multiple listings supports inclusion of sewer in the HOA fees at an implied confidence level.
WATER appears in all 7 current MLS listings, indicating association fees likely include water. None of the public remarks (0/7) explicitly confirm water included, and the presence of unit water heaters in most listings suggests hot water may not be covered, but water service itself appears to be included per MLS entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple MLS fields indicate storage: 5 of 7 listings have STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG checked in amenities and 6 of 7 list STORAG in unit_features. Current public remarks explicitly state 'Storage in building' (appears in agent remarks for this unit), providing direct confirmation across agents rather than a lone checkbox—evidence is strong that the building offers storage/lockers.
I looked for explicit terms such as 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', or 'surf storage' and found none. Although general storage is mentioned, there is no explicit evidence the building provides dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Four of seven current MLS listings include the TRACHU amenity, but zero of the provided public remarks mention a trash/garbage/refuse chute. Given the lack of any remark confirmation and prior low historical confidence, the feature is possible per MLS checkboxes but remains uncertain and likely reflects agent copy/paste; treat as low-confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', and similar terms and found none. Building context indicates there is no pool, so salt pool is not indicated.
All 7 current MLS listings list 'WASHER/DRYER' in the inclusions (7/7). None of the provided public remarks explicitly mention laundry or in-unit washer/dryer, but the consistent, building-wide MLS inclusions across multiple listings provides strong evidence that some units have in-unit laundry. This may reflect agent copy/paste in some cases, but the uniformity across all listings supports including the feature for buyers searching for in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'paid laundry', 'card operated', or 'quarters' and found no references. There is no evidence the building's community laundry (if any) requires payment.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found none. No evidence in the remarks indicates community laundry is available on every floor.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across multiple listings indicates assigned parking is provided. Remarks explicitly state 'Two assigned covered parking' and reference assigned spaces in the gated garage in several listing blocks (confirmed historically in MLS as 7/7). Evidence appears consistent across agents rather than a single copy/paste error.
Covered parking is well-supported: remarks repeatedly state 'covered garage parking' and 'covered, gated garage parking.' Multiple listing blocks reference covered stalls in the gated garage, matching MLS checkbox data (5/7) and prior high-confidence assessments.
Multiple listings explicitly describe assigned/covered garage parking for owners and two assigned covered stalls for the unit, indicating parking is deeded/owner-assigned.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', and 'parking rental' and found none. The remarks emphasize owner-assigned covered parking and guest stalls but do not state any recurring parking charge.
Guest parking is explicitly mentioned in the remarks: 'the front deck has 14 guest parking spaces' appears across several listing blocks. This corroborates MLS guest-parking flags (5/7) and prior high-confidence conclusions.
Secured entry/parking is supported by multiple remarks: phrases like 'gated garage', 'Secured Entrance with video call up', and 'video call-up and keyed elevator' appear in several listing blocks, aligning with MLS secured-entry flags and prior high-confidence assessments.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as 'parking waitlist' or 'waiting list' and found no references. Given the remarks describe assigned parking for owners, there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly describe controlled access features (video call-up and keyed elevator/secured entrance), which indicate electronic/card/fob-style controlled entry. This supports a security card/fob access system.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'security patrol', 'roving security', and 'patrol service' and found none. There is an onsite resident manager and secured entry but no reference to a patrol service.
No analysis available
2 of 6 current listings include ACCEN/CENAC in unit features (and 2 of 6 list ACCEN in inclusions), suggesting some units advertise central AC. Public remarks repeatedly state only “A/C in apt” and do not use phrases like “central air” or “building central AC,” so the evidence points to some units having central-style systems but is not strongly confirmed across agents. Confidence is moderate because the checkbox data indicates presence in some units while remarks do not explicitly confirm a building-wide central system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of seven current MLS listings list concrete (CONCRE) as a construction material, while none of the provided public remarks explicitly mention 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete.' Historical confidence was Medium and the majority of MLS checkboxes are set, so the building is marked as concrete with moderate confidence; evidence appears to be MLS-coded rather than described in agent remarks.
Public remarks do not reference 'double wall' or 'double-wall' construction in any listing. Although 3/6 MLS entries include a double-wall code, the agent remarks provide no supporting language and appear reused across listings, so the evidence does not support confirming double-wall construction.
No analysis available
None of the remarks mention 'masonry' or 'stucco' construction. Despite 3/6 MLS entries coding MASSTU, the lack of any descriptive confirmation in agent remarks—many of which are clearly copy/pasted—means there is not enough evidence to include masonry/stucco as a confirmed building feature.
No public remarks reference 'steel frame' or similar terminology. Although 2/6 MLS entries list steel frame, the public remarks are silent on structure and appear duplicated across listings, so evidence is insufficient to confirm steel-frame construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of seven current MLS listings include an 'above ground' construction code (ABOGRO), but none of the public remarks mention above-ground construction. With no prior confidence and limited checkbox support across listings, this feature is included with low–moderate confidence and may reflect agent checkbox usage rather than explicit building description.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for STR-related terms (short-term rental, vacation rental, NUC/TVU, 30-day minimum) and found none. Absence of mention means STR allowance is not indicated in the public remarks.
There is no reference to a hotel rental program or hotel management in the public remarks. Because STRs are not indicated, hotel-rental-pool participation is set to false.
No language about a rental pool or required participation appears in the public remarks. As STRs are not indicated in the listings, mandatory participation in a hotel pool is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks describe this as a 'Fee Simple' building, indicating it is not leasehold. Therefore there is no lease expiry year to extract.
I searched the public remarks for terms like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and 'VA loans accepted' and found no references. With no mention across listings, VA financing approval is assumed not indicated in remarks.
I searched the remarks for insurance-related phrases indicating HOA walls-in or full building insurance and found no references. Because the remarks do not state the building is fully insured and no user verification exists, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No public remarks (0/6 listings) mention a fire sprinkler system; MLS checkbox is inconsistent (3/6 listings show FIRSPR), and there is no prior high-confidence history. Because remarks are silent and agent checkboxing appears inconsistent, there is weak evidence the building actually has a sprinkler system.
I searched the remarks for terms like 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'passed fire inspection', and 'life safety compliant' and found none. With no explicit mention and no current verified value, the field is set to false with medium confidence (absence of evidence in remarks).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
All listing remarks consistently describe direct oceanfront location and expansive ocean views (6 of 6 content sections). Key phrases: 'Direct Oceanfront', 'unobstructed 180° panoramic views of the Pacific Ocean', 'ocean views', and 'oceanfront unit'. Evidence is strong and repeated across multiple agent remarks, confirming the building offers ocean-view units.
Several listing sections explicitly state 'mountain-facing bedrooms' and refer to 'mountain vistas' (appears in multiple content sections). While Diamond Head is called out specifically, the explicit 'mountain-facing' phrasing indicates some units have mountain views, so the building should be listed as offering mountain-facing units.
Multiple remarks across the listings (at least 5 of 6 content sections) explicitly mention 'Diamond Head' views—phrases include 'Diamond Head from each bedroom' and 'Diamond Head views from bedrooms'. Historical high-confidence data plus repeated current mentions make this a strongly supported building-level feature.
No analysis available
Several remarks describe 'coastal living', the Gold Coast location and overlook of a famous surf spot (2–3 of 5 content sections), which implies coastline/shoreline views. The language is less explicit than the ocean and Diamond Head mentions, so confidence is moderate (implied rather than explicitly 'coastline view').
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listing sections (at least 3 of 6 content sections) explicitly mention sunset views and enjoying 'sunsets each evening' from the lanai and living areas. The repeated, explicit language across agent remarks indicates the building offers units with sunset/western exposure.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit language like 'see fireworks from lanai', 'watch fireworks from unit', or 'fireworks view' and found none. The remarks describe ocean, sunset, surf, whale watching, and city lights views but make no claim about fireworks views from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence that the building has a resident manager: MLS amenities show RESMAN on all 7 listings and several remarks explicitly state 'Resident manager on site' and 'Onsite Resident Manager.' Multiple listings/agents repeat this feature, indicating it is a consistent building-level amenity rather than a one-off or error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.