3003 Kalakaua
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
3003 Kalakaua
Building Overview
3003 Kalakaua in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis; built 1962, concrete construction. Pets allowed; short-term rentals not permitted.
About 3003 Kalakaua
3003 Kalakaua is a residential building located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood. According to available records the building was constructed in 1962 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data available for this listing.
Key policy details recorded in the MLS include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The listing does not identify a management company; the MLS entry lists the management company as unknown.
Parking, maintenance fees, amenity details, and other operational information are not included in the provided MLS data. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify building size, parking, fees, amenity availability, and management details with the listing agent or condominium association prior to making purchase decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit percentages or descriptors of owner-occupancy such as 'owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', or specific percentages and found none. Remarks describe building as 'boutique' and 'two units per floor' but do not provide an owner-occupancy figure; per rules, cannot infer a numeric percentage without an explicit statement, so the value is null with low confidence.
Public remarks clearly indicate there are elevators (keyed elevator; semi-private elevator foyer for each unit) but no explicit numeric count is provided. I searched the remarks for explicit numeric phrases like '4 elevators' or 'two elevators' and found none. Per rules, cannot guess a number without an explicit mention, so value is left null with low confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
CABTV is checked in all 7 current listings, though none of the public remarks (0/7) explicitly mention 'cable' or 'cable included'. The consistency across multiple agents/listings suggests the association fee likely includes cable, but absence of explicit remark confirmation lowers confidence to an implied level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
HOTWAT appears in only 3 of 7 listings while WTRHTR (unit water heaters) is listed in 6 of 7, and none of the public remarks (0/7) mention hot water-in-fees. The presence of unit water heaters across most listings is a strong indicator that hot water is not provided by the building/HOA, so fee_inc_hot_water is set to false.
MLS checkbox INTSER appears in 5 of 6 listings, but none of the public remarks mention 'internet included' or 'wifi included.' The MLS flags consistently indicate internet included, but lack of explicit remarks suggests moderate confidence and potential copy/paste.
No analysis available
SEWER is checked in all 7 current listings and historically has been consistently marked across MLS entries. No public remarks (0/7) reference sewer, but the consistent agent checkbox usage across multiple listings supports inclusion of sewer in the HOA fees at an implied confidence level.
WATER appears in all 7 current MLS listings, indicating association fees likely include water. None of the public remarks (0/7) explicitly confirm water included, and the presence of unit water heaters in most listings suggests hot water may not be covered, but water service itself appears to be included per MLS entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple MLS fields indicate storage: 5 of 7 listings have STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG checked in amenities and 6 of 7 list STORAG in unit_features. Current public remarks explicitly state 'Storage in building' (appears in agent remarks for this unit), providing direct confirmation across agents rather than a lone checkbox—evidence is strong that the building offers storage/lockers.
I searched for explicit terms such as 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', or 'surf storage' and found none. Although the remarks note general storage in the building, without a specific mention of surfboard storage this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
Four of seven current MLS listings include the TRACHU amenity, but zero of the provided public remarks mention a trash/garbage/refuse chute. Given the lack of any remark confirmation and prior low historical confidence, the feature is possible per MLS checkboxes but remains uncertain and likely reflects agent copy/paste; treat as low-confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Building context shows pool=False and the public remarks do not mention any pool or 'saltwater' pool. I am keeping pool_salt false with low confidence because there is no mention in remarks and the building context indicates no pool.
All 7 current MLS listings list 'WASHER/DRYER' in the inclusions (7/7). None of the provided public remarks explicitly mention laundry or in-unit washer/dryer, but the consistent, building-wide MLS inclusions across multiple listings provides strong evidence that some units have in-unit laundry. This may reflect agent copy/paste in some cases, but the uniformity across all listings supports including the feature for buyers searching for in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'paid laundry', 'card operated', and 'quarters' and found none. Because there is no mention of any laundry at all, paid community laundry cannot be confirmed and is set to false with medium confidence.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry' but found no references. Without an explicit statement about floor-by-floor laundry, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across multiple listings indicates assigned parking is provided. Remarks explicitly state 'Two assigned covered parking' and reference assigned spaces in the gated garage in several listing blocks (confirmed historically in MLS as 7/7). Evidence appears consistent across agents rather than a single copy/paste error.
Covered parking is well-supported: remarks repeatedly state 'covered garage parking' and 'covered, gated garage parking.' Multiple listing blocks reference covered stalls in the gated garage, matching MLS checkbox data (5/7) and prior high-confidence assessments.
Listings explicitly indicate assigned/covered garage parking for owners and two assigned covered stalls for the unit, which supports that parking is deeded/owner-assigned. Marked true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', or 'parking rental' and found none. Because remarks describe owner-assigned covered parking and guest stalls but give no fee information, the monthly parking fee is unknown (null) with low confidence.
Guest parking is explicitly mentioned in the remarks: 'the front deck has 14 guest parking spaces' appears across several listing blocks. This corroborates MLS guest-parking flags (5/7) and prior high-confidence conclusions.
Secured entry/parking is supported by multiple remarks: phrases like 'gated garage', 'Secured Entrance with video call up', and 'video call-up and keyed elevator' appear in several listing blocks, aligning with MLS secured-entry flags and prior high-confidence assessments.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar wording and found no references. Given the absence of any mention and the described assigned parking, a waitlist is not indicated (false) with medium confidence.
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly describe controlled access features: 'Entrance lobby has video call-up and keyed elevator' and 'Secured Entrance with video call up.' Those statements indicate electronic/keyed access, so security_card is set to true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for references to security patrols or roving/patrolled services and found none. With no mention, security_patrol is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
2 of 6 current listings include ACCEN/CENAC in unit features (and 2 of 6 list ACCEN in inclusions), suggesting some units advertise central AC. Public remarks repeatedly state only “A/C in apt” and do not use phrases like “central air” or “building central AC,” so the evidence points to some units having central-style systems but is not strongly confirmed across agents. Confidence is moderate because the checkbox data indicates presence in some units while remarks do not explicitly confirm a building-wide central system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of seven current MLS listings list concrete (CONCRE) as a construction material, while none of the provided public remarks explicitly mention 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete.' Historical confidence was Medium and the majority of MLS checkboxes are set, so the building is marked as concrete with moderate confidence; evidence appears to be MLS-coded rather than described in agent remarks.
Public remarks do not reference 'double wall' or 'double-wall' construction in any listing. Although 3/6 MLS entries include a double-wall code, the agent remarks provide no supporting language and appear reused across listings, so the evidence does not support confirming double-wall construction.
No analysis available
None of the remarks mention 'masonry' or 'stucco' construction. Despite 3/6 MLS entries coding MASSTU, the lack of any descriptive confirmation in agent remarks—many of which are clearly copy/pasted—means there is not enough evidence to include masonry/stucco as a confirmed building feature.
No public remarks reference 'steel frame' or similar terminology. Although 2/6 MLS entries list steel frame, the public remarks are silent on structure and appear duplicated across listings, so evidence is insufficient to confirm steel-frame construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of seven current MLS listings include an 'above ground' construction code (ABOGRO), but none of the public remarks mention above-ground construction. With no prior confidence and limited checkbox support across listings, this feature is included with low–moderate confidence and may reflect agent checkbox usage rather than explicit building description.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'NUC', 'TVU', '30-day', or similar phrases and found none. Therefore STR is assumed not explicitly allowed (false) with medium confidence due to absence of any statement.
Because short-term rentals are not mentioned and there is no reference to a hotel rental pool or hotel management, hotel pool participation is set to false. This follows the prerequisite that hotel-pool can only be true if STRs are allowed; given no STR indication, this is false with fairly high confidence.
There is no language about any rental pool or required participation in public remarks. Since STRs are not indicated, mandatory participation is set to false; confidence is fairly high because prerequisite STR allowance is absent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly state this is a 'Fee Simple' building, indicating the property is not leasehold. Therefore there is no lease expiry year to extract; returned as null with high confidence.
I searched the remarks for terms like 'VA approved', 'VA financing' or 'VA loans accepted' and found no references. With no mentions in any listing, VA financing approval is presumed not stated (false) with medium confidence.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage', and 'comprehensive building insurance' and found none. Because there is no explicit statement in the public remarks and no prior verified value provided, this is set to false with medium confidence (no evidence in the remarks to indicate full HOA/building insurance).
No public remarks (0/6 listings) mention a fire sprinkler system; MLS checkbox is inconsistent (3/6 listings show FIRSPR), and there is no prior high-confidence history. Because remarks are silent and agent checkboxing appears inconsistent, there is weak evidence the building actually has a sprinkler system.
I searched the public remarks for terms such as 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'life safety compliant', and similar phrases and found no references. With no current verified value provided and no mentions in remarks, the field is set to false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests it likely isn't reported publicly).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
All listing remarks consistently describe direct oceanfront location and expansive ocean views (6 of 6 content sections). Key phrases: 'Direct Oceanfront', 'unobstructed 180° panoramic views of the Pacific Ocean', 'ocean views', and 'oceanfront unit'. Evidence is strong and repeated across multiple agent remarks, confirming the building offers ocean-view units.
Several listing sections explicitly state 'mountain-facing bedrooms' and refer to 'mountain vistas' (appears in multiple content sections). While Diamond Head is called out specifically, the explicit 'mountain-facing' phrasing indicates some units have mountain views, so the building should be listed as offering mountain-facing units.
Multiple remarks across the listings (at least 5 of 6 content sections) explicitly mention 'Diamond Head' views—phrases include 'Diamond Head from each bedroom' and 'Diamond Head views from bedrooms'. Historical high-confidence data plus repeated current mentions make this a strongly supported building-level feature.
No analysis available
Several remarks describe 'coastal living', the Gold Coast location and overlook of a famous surf spot (2–3 of 5 content sections), which implies coastline/shoreline views. The language is less explicit than the ocean and Diamond Head mentions, so confidence is moderate (implied rather than explicitly 'coastline view').
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listing sections (at least 3 of 6 content sections) explicitly mention sunset views and enjoying 'sunsets each evening' from the lanai and living areas. The repeated, explicit language across agent remarks indicates the building offers units with sunset/western exposure.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit language indicating the building or units have views of Friday night fireworks (e.g., 'see fireworks from lanai', 'fireworks view from unit') but found none. The remarks discuss ocean views, sunsets, surf, and whale watching but do not mention fireworks, so this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence that the building has a resident manager: MLS amenities show RESMAN on all 7 listings and several remarks explicitly state 'Resident manager on site' and 'Onsite Resident Manager.' Multiple listings/agents repeat this feature, indicating it is a consistent building-level amenity rather than a one-off or error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.