2465 Kuhio at Waikiki

25 of 26 listings report year built as 1971, matching the declared value. This is a well-established data point from MLS records.

None of the 26 listings explicitly state the total number of floors in the building, nor do they describe it as a specific 'X-story' tower. Several listings reference unit numbers such as #1417, #1418, #717, #618, #602, #517, and #306, which indicate there are at least 14 numbered floors (e.g., '#1417 - Studio' and '#1418 - 1 bdrm'). One listing mentions a 'HIGH FLOOR UNIT' but does not quantify how many floors exist in total. While the presence of units in the 1400 range suggests a mid- to high-rise structure, there is no direct evidence of the building’s maximum floor count. Because any specific total would be speculative, the floor count is marked as unknown with low confidence.

The unit total value of 91 is a building-level attribute that cannot be directly verified from individual unit listings. This information typically comes from building documentation or county records.

The dataset includes a building-level owner-occupancy value of 21.0% which is retained. I searched the remarks for explicit statements like '80% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied' and found none that refer to building-wide percentage—only a unit-level note 'Owner occupied'. Therefore the 21.0% value is kept with low confidence due to lack of corroborating remarks.

Listings repeatedly reference being 'close to the elevator' which confirms elevator presence but provides no count. I searched for phrases like '4 elevators', 'four elevators', and 'multiple elevators' and found none. Without an explicit numeric statement, the number of elevators is unknown and cannot be changed or guessed.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Across 26 listings, many explicitly detail what the maintenance fee includes, and none mention air conditioning or central AC as part of the fees. Repeated descriptions say variations of: 'Maintenance fee includes electricity, gas, hot water, water, sewer, and common area electricity' or 'covers electricity, gas, hot water, cable and internet.' Several listings specifically note 'window air' or 'window A/C (2)' as part of the unit furnishings, which strongly suggests individual, not central, air systems and that AC is not a building- or fee-included utility. No listing states that air conditioning is included in HOA/maintenance fees, despite detailed breakdowns. Given the consistent omission of AC from fee inclusions and explicit mention of window units, the building’s maintenance fees almost certainly do not include central air conditioning.

Multiple agent remarks explicitly state cable is included (e.g., 'Maintenance fee covers ... cable' and 'Maintenance fee includes electricity, gas, hot water, cable and internet'). CURRENT MLS DATA notes CABTV checked in 7/20 listings. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, indicating building-level inclusion of cable in maintenance fees.

Strong, consistent evidence across listings: many remarks say 'Maintenance fees includes ... common area electricity' or 'common area expenses.' CURRENT MLS DATA has OTCOEX in 19/20 listings, and the public remarks repeatedly reference common area electricity being covered.

Across the 26 listings, many explicitly detail what the maintenance fee includes, and none mention cooperative or co-op taxes. Typical phrases are: 'Maintenance fee includes electricity, gas, water, hot water, sewer, internet' and variations like 'includes electricity, gas, hot water, water, sewer, and common area electricity' or 'maintenance fee is $1150 includes electricity, hot water, and gas.' Several listings repeat these inclusions with minor differences (sometimes adding cable and internet), but there is never any reference to 'coop taxes,' 'co-op tax,' or similar language. Given that multiple agents are clearly itemizing included costs and omit any tax component, this strongly suggests that cooperative taxes are not part of the maintenance fees. Therefore, the building-level feature for maintenance including cooperative taxes should be set to false.

High confidence: explicit mentions across many listings ('Maintenance fee includes electricity', 'Maintenance fee covers electricity') and ELECTR present in 18/20 MLS entries, showing electricity is included in the building maintenance fees.

Multiple agent remarks explicitly list gas included in the maintenance fee and current MLS checkbox GAS is set in 19/20 listings, indicating building-level inclusion of gas in the association fees.

In the 26-listing corpus, at least 10 listings explicitly state that the maintenance/HOA fee includes hot water. Examples include: 'Maintenance fee includes electricity, gas, water, hot water, sewer, internet' and multiple variants such as 'Maintenance fee includes electricity, gas, hot water, water, sewer, and common area electricity' and 'Maintenance fees cover electricity, gas, hot water, cable, and internet.' No listings mention individual water heaters or WTRHTR, and none contradict the inclusion of hot water. The repeated, consistent phrasing across many separate listings strongly indicates that building-supplied hot water is part of the maintenance fee. Because this is directly and explicitly stated in numerous remarks with no opposing evidence, the determination is made with maximum confidence.

Several listings explicitly state 'Maintenance fee includes ... internet' or 'internet included,' and INTSER is checked in 8/20 MLS entries. Evidence is consistent across multiple remarks though less ubiquitous than utilities like water/electricity.

Across 26 listings, multiple remarks explicitly detail what the maintenance fee includes, and none mention a marina, boat slip, or any marina-related access or fees. Typical descriptions are variations of: 'Maintenance fee includes electricity, gas, hot water, water, sewer, and common area electricity' or 'includes electricity, gas, water, hot water, sewer, internet, and a dedicated manager.' Several listings repeat these inclusions with minor differences (sometimes adding cable or internet), but there is never any reference to a marina or boating facility. Given how consistently agents enumerate included utilities and services, the absence of any marina-related inclusion in all 26 listings strongly indicates that marina access or boat slip fees are not part of the maintenance fees. Therefore, the building-level feature fee_inc_marina should be set to false with high confidence.

Strong evidence: repeated agent remarks ('Maintenance fee includes ... water, sewer') and SEWER present in 18/20 current MLS records, supporting inclusion of sewer in association fees.

High confidence: many agent remarks explicitly list water among included items ('Maintenance fee includes ... water') and WATER is checked in 18/20 MLS listings, indicating water is part of the maintenance fees.

Across all 26 listings in the remarks corpus, none mention any form of BBQ, barbecue, grill, grilling area, or outdoor cooking facilities. The building features that are repeatedly highlighted include a resident or site manager, secured entrance, security cameras, community laundry, surfboard and bike storage, and parking, as well as utilities included in the maintenance fee. Several listings explicitly list amenities in phrases like 'Building amenities include a resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras' and 'This building includes a Resident Manager, surfboard storage, bike storage, community laundry and more,' but still do not reference BBQ facilities. Given how consistently other amenities are marketed and the complete absence of any grilling-related terms, it is likely that the building does not offer dedicated BBQ or grill facilities. Therefore, the feature is set to false with high confidence.

Out of 26 listings, at least 3 explicitly mention bike-related storage as a building feature. One listing states, 'Surfboard storage, bike storage, community laundry and more,' and another similarly notes, 'This building includes a Site Manager, surfboard storage, bike storage, community laundry and more.' A further listing references 'Surf racks ON the building property,' reinforcing the presence of dedicated storage for boards and related gear. These repeated, explicit mentions across multiple units indicate that bike storage is a standard building amenity rather than a unit-specific feature. Because the references are clear and unambiguous, the determination that the building has bike storage is made with very high confidence.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, none mention any boating-related amenities such as a 'boat dock,' 'marina,' 'boat slip,' or 'yacht' access, despite extensive detail on other building features. The remarks repeatedly highlight amenities like 'surfboard storage,' 'surf racks ON the building property,' 'bike storage,' 'community laundry,' 'secured entrance,' and a 'resident/site manager,' but never reference dock or marina facilities. Several listings emphasize proximity to Waikiki Beach and being 'less than 700 ft. to the Ocean' or 'one block away from the famous Waikiki beach,' yet still omit any mention of boat mooring or dock access, which would be a strong selling point if present. The consistent silence on boat-related infrastructure across all units strongly suggests the building does not have a boat dock or marina access.

Across all 26 listings in the remarks corpus, none mention any kind of car wash facility, auto wash, vehicle wash area, or car wash station. The remarks repeatedly list building amenities such as resident or site manager, secured entrance, security cameras, surfboard storage, bike storage, community laundry, and parking, but never reference a car wash. For example, one listing notes, 'This building includes a Resident Manager, surfboard storage, bike storage, community laundry and more,' and another says, 'Building features resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras,' yet still omits any car wash feature. Given how consistently amenities are described and how often parking and storage are highlighted, the absence of any car wash mention across all 26 listings strongly suggests the building does not offer this facility. Therefore, the feature is set to false with high confidence.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, none mention a clubhouse, club house, community center, or recreation center. The building amenities are repeatedly described as including a 'resident manager,' 'community laundry,' 'secured entrance,' 'security cameras,' 'surfboard storage,' 'bike storage,' and parking, but no shared social or recreational clubhouse space. For example, one listing notes, 'Building features resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras,' and another says, 'This building includes a Resident Manager, surfboard storage, bike storage, community laundry and more,' without adding any clubhouse-type facility. Given the strong focus on investment/short-term rental features and the consistency of amenity descriptions across many listings, the absence of any clubhouse reference is meaningful. Therefore, it is very likely that this building does not have a clubhouse or community center.

Across 26 listings, none mention a concierge, concierge service, front desk service, or a staffed desk. Instead, multiple listings consistently describe the building as having a 'resident manager' or 'live-in manager' and being a 'secured building' with 'secured entrance' and 'security cameras,' but no staffed front desk. For example, one listing notes: 'Building amenities include a resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras,' and another: 'This building includes a Resident Manager, surfboard storage, bike storage, community laundry and more.' The repetition of these features without any reference to concierge services suggests that the building relies on a resident/site manager model rather than a concierge/front desk. Given the number of listings and their detail, it is very likely that if concierge service existed, at least one would mention it, so the feature is set to false with high confidence.

Across 26 listings, amenities and building features are described in detail—resident/site manager, secured entrance, security cameras, community laundry, surfboard and bike storage, parking, and being pet-friendly—but there are no mentions of a dog park, dog run, or dedicated pet area. Several listings explicitly note the building is 'PET FRIENDLY,' yet still do not reference any on-site pet exercise space, which would typically be highlighted if present. The remarks instead emphasize proximity to Waikiki Beach, shopping, dining, and bus lines, and repeatedly detail other amenities and the special assessment. Given this level of descriptive detail and the complete absence of terms like 'dog park,' 'dog run,' or 'pet area' in any listing, it is very likely the building does not have a dedicated dog park or pet area.

Across 26 listings, none mention a doorman, door attendant, or lobby attendant, which would be a strong selling point if present, especially in a resort-zoned Waikiki building. Instead, multiple listings emphasize other security/management features such as a 'resident manager' or 'live-in manager,' 'secured entrance,' 'secure entry,' 'secured building,' and 'security cameras,' but never a staffed door. For example, one listing notes, 'Building amenities include a resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras,' and another says, 'Secured building with one covered secured parking stall,' with no reference to a doorman. Several listings repeat that Kuhio at Waikiki is a 'secured, PET FRIENDLY building' and highlight surfboard/bike storage and parking, again omitting any lobby attendant. Given the consistency of these descriptions and the complete absence of doorman-related terms, it is very likely that this building does not have a doorman or lobby attendant.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki / 2465 Kuhio Ave, none mention an exercise room, gym, fitness center, or similar facility. The amenities that are repeatedly highlighted are a resident or site manager, secured entrance, security cameras, community laundry, surfboard storage, bike storage, and parking (e.g., 'Building features resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras' and 'This building includes a Resident Manager, surfboard storage, bike storage, community laundry and more'). Given how consistently agents list building features, the absence of any reference to a gym or fitness room in all 26 remarks strongly suggests the building does not have one. If an exercise room existed, it would likely be promoted alongside these other amenities, especially in an investment- and resort-focused building. Therefore, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building lacks an exercise room.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki / 2465 Kuhio Ave, none mention any form of limousine or car service, nor related terms such as 'limo service', 'house car', 'courtesy car', 'complimentary car service', 'town car', or 'chauffeur'. The amenities that are repeatedly highlighted are resident or site manager, secured entrance, security cameras, surfboard and bike storage, community laundry, and assigned or covered parking (e.g., 'Building features resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras', 'comes with 1 parking stall in a gated and secured lot'). In luxury buildings that do offer limo or house car service, this is typically a prominently advertised perk, especially in marketing-heavy, investment-focused remarks like these. The complete absence of any such mention in all 26 remarks, despite detailed amenity descriptions, strongly indicates that the building does not provide limousine or car service.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki / 2465 Kuhio Ave, none mention a meeting room, conference room, board room, hospitality room, or community room. The amenities that are repeatedly highlighted are: “resident manager / live-in manager,” “community laundry,” “secured entrance,” “security cameras,” “surfboard storage,” “bike storage,” and parking, plus being “resort zoned” and legal for short-term rentals. For example, one listing notes, “Building amenities include a resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras,” and another says, “This building includes a Resident Manager, surfboard storage, bike storage, community laundry and more,” but no shared meeting or conference space is ever referenced. Given how consistently other building amenities are advertised across many listings, the complete absence of any meeting-room-related term strongly suggests the building does not offer this feature. Therefore, the meeting_room feature is set to false with high confidence.

Multiple listings explicitly reference private outdoor spaces that function as patios/decks, indicating the building provides this type of amenity. At least 6 of 26 listings mention 'two private lanais' or '2 separate lanais' (e.g., '2 private lanais with city and mountain views' and '989 Sqft living area plus 2 lanais of 130 sqfts'), and several others note individual units with 'lanai' or 'balconies.' In the Hawaii context, lanais are outdoor deck/patio-style spaces integral to the building’s design. While these are unit-level rather than a single shared roof deck, the repeated emphasis on lanais across many units shows that patio/deck-style outdoor space is a consistent building feature. No listing contradicts this or suggests an absence of such spaces, so the evidence strongly supports marking this feature as present.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, none mention any jogging, walking, or fitness path as a building amenity. Amenities are repeatedly described in detail—'surfboard storage, bike storage, community laundry,' 'resident manager, secured entrance and security cameras,' and 'one covered parking stall'—but there is no reference to a 'jogging path,' 'walking path,' or similar feature. Outdoor benefits are framed in terms of proximity to Waikiki Beach, parks, and city life (e.g., 'a couple blocks away from famous WAIKIKI BEACH' and 'Less than 700 ft. to the Ocean'), not on-site paths. Given how consistently other amenities are advertised across many listings, the absence of any mention of a jogging or walking path strongly suggests the building does not have one. Therefore, the feature is set to false with high confidence.

Across all 26 listings in the remarks corpus, none mention a playground, children's play area, kids play area, tot lot, or any similar feature. The building amenities are repeatedly described in detail—'surfboard storage, bike storage, community laundry,' 'resident manager,' 'secured entrance,' 'security cameras,' and parking—but there is never a reference to any play structure or child-focused outdoor area. Multiple listings list amenities in a way that would naturally include a playground if present, yet it is consistently absent. The building is heavily marketed as an investment/short-term rental property near the beach rather than a family-oriented complex. Given the thorough amenity descriptions and complete silence on any playground, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building does not have this feature.

Across 26 listings for this building, none mention any kind of yard, fenced yard, or private ground-level outdoor space. Outdoor areas are consistently described as 'two private lanais,' 'two private balconies,' or simply 'lanai,' which are balcony-style spaces, not yards. Several listings repeat this pattern, e.g., '2 private lanais with city & mountain views' and '2 lanais, both with ocean, Diamond Head, Waikiki City life Views,' reinforcing that the outdoor space is elevated, not a yard. No listing uses phrases like 'private yard,' 'enclosed yard,' or 'yard access,' despite detailed amenity descriptions (parking, surfboard storage, pet-friendly, etc.). Given the high number of listings and complete silence on any yard feature, the building is very likely to lack private yard space.

Across 26 listings for this building, none mention a putting green or any golf-related amenity. The remarks repeatedly highlight other features such as being 'RESORT ZONED & SHORT TERM RENTALS ARE LEGAL,' 'surfboard storage, bike storage, community laundry,' and a 'resident manager' and 'secured entrance,' but there is no reference to a 'putting green,' 'golf putting green,' or similar facility. Several listings provide fairly detailed amenity lists (e.g., 'Building features resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras'), which suggests that a putting green would likely be mentioned if it existed. The complete silence on this feature across all 26 remarks strongly indicates that the building does not have a putting green.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, none mention a recreation area, rec area, recreation deck, amenity deck, or similar shared recreation space. The building features that are repeatedly highlighted are resident or site manager, 'community laundry,' 'secured entrance,' 'security cameras,' 'surfboard storage,' 'bike storage,' and parking, but no recreational deck or area. Several listings explicitly enumerate amenities (e.g., 'Building amenities include a resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras') without including any recreation area, which suggests its absence. Given that agents are consistently detailed about amenities and never reference a recreation or amenity deck, it is very likely the building does not have this feature.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, none mention a recreation room, rec room, game room, entertainment room, or multi-purpose room. Building amenities are repeatedly described in detail as including a resident or site manager, community/shared laundry, secured entrance, security cameras, surfboard storage, bike storage, and parking, e.g., 'Building amenities include a resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras' and 'This building includes a Resident Manager, surfboard storage, bike storage, community laundry and more.' Given how consistently amenities are listed and how often recreation rooms are explicitly advertised when present in condo buildings, the complete absence of any such reference across all 26 remarks strongly suggests the building does not have a recreation room.

Across 26 listings, none mention an on-site or in-building restaurant, café, or dining facility as a building amenity. The remarks repeatedly highlight other features such as a resident or site manager, community laundry, surfboard and bike storage, secured entrance, security cameras, and parking, but never refer to any food service within the building. Dining references are consistently external, e.g., “steps from Waikiki Beach, shopping, dining, and entertainment,” “many shops, restaurants, entertainment and more,” and “conveniently located around eateries, entertainment and shopping,” which all describe nearby neighborhood options, not an in-house restaurant. Given how frequently investment-relevant amenities are detailed, the absence of any explicit mention of a restaurant strongly suggests the building does not have one. Therefore, the feature is set to false with high confidence.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki / 2465 Kuhio Ave, none mention any rooftop-related amenities or access. The amenities that are repeatedly highlighted are resident or site manager, community laundry, secured entrance, security cameras, surfboard storage or surf racks, bike storage, and parking (e.g., 'Building features resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras' and 'Surfboard storage, bike storage, community laundry and more'). Several listings go into detail about views, lanais, and building features without ever referencing a roof deck, rooftop terrace, or rooftop amenities. Given how consistently agents market other building amenities and the complete absence of rooftop mentions in all 26 remarks, it is very likely that the building does not offer rooftop amenities or access. Therefore, the rooftop feature is set to false with high confidence.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, none mention a sauna, steam room, dry sauna, or wet sauna. Amenities are repeatedly described in detail—'resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras,' plus 'surfboard storage, bike storage' and parking—but no listing adds sauna or similar facilities to these lists. Several units explicitly summarize building features with phrases like 'Building features resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras' and 'This building includes a Resident Manager, surfboard storage, bike storage, community laundry and more,' yet still omit any sauna reference. Given how consistently other amenities are advertised and the complete silence on any sauna or steam room in all 26 remarks, it is very likely the building does not have this feature.

Strong evidence that the building offers storage/lockers: public remarks across multiple listings repeatedly reference "surfboard storage", "bike storage", and "surf racks" (appearing in at least six separate remarks). Although only 1/20 current MLS listings have the STORAG checkbox checked, the consistent, repeated mentions across agents and historical high-confidence data indicate the building provides shared storage amenities.

Several public remarks explicitly list surfboard storage (also referenced as 'surf racks') as a building amenity. This is consistently mentioned across multiple listings, providing high confidence that surfboard storage is available.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, none mention any tennis-related amenities such as a 'tennis court' or 'tennis facilities.' Amenities are repeatedly described in detail—'resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras,' plus 'surfboard storage, bike storage' and parking—but no listing adds tennis among the building features. Several listings explicitly list what the building includes (e.g., 'This building includes a Resident Manager, surfboard storage, bike storage, community laundry and more') without referencing tennis, which would likely be highlighted if present. The consistent omission of tennis courts in a corpus that otherwise heavily markets amenities and location strongly suggests the building does not have them. Therefore, the tennis_court feature is set to false with high confidence.

MLS checkbox data indicates a trash chute (TRACHU) on 18 of 20 recent listings, providing broad agent-reported coverage across units. However, none of the public remarks (0/~30 remarks reviewed) explicitly mention "trash chute", "garbage chute" or similar, so the feature is included based on strong MLS reporting but with moderate confidence because agent copy/paste could be the source of the amenity flag.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, none mention valet, valet service, or valet parking. Parking is consistently described as 'assigned parking stall,' '1 covered parking,' or 'one covered secured parking stall,' which implies self-parking rather than valet. Several listings detail building features such as 'resident manager,' 'site manager,' 'secured entrance,' 'security cameras,' 'surfboard storage,' 'bike storage,' and 'community laundry,' but no listing adds valet to this amenity list. Given how frequently amenities are enumerated for this resort-zoned, short-term-rental-friendly building, the absence of any valet reference in all 26 remarks strongly suggests the building does not offer valet service. Therefore, the feature 'valet' is set to false with high confidence.

Across the 26 listings, several explicitly reference gated or secured parking, indicating a physical barrier such as a fence or wall around at least the parking area. One listing notes '1 parking stall in a gated and secured lot,' and another mentions a 'secured building with one covered secured parking stall,' both of which strongly imply a fenced or walled enclosure for vehicles. Multiple listings also describe the property as a 'secured' building with 'secured entrance' and security cameras, consistent with a building that controls perimeter access. While no remarks use the exact words 'fence' or 'wall,' the repeated mention of a gated lot is direct evidence of a perimeter barrier. Because this is a single building and the descriptions are consistent across many units, it is reasonable to infer that the building property includes a wall or fence, particularly around the parking area.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, none mention any whirlpool, hot tub, jacuzzi, spa, or hydrotherapy facility. The amenities that are repeatedly highlighted are 'resident manager,' 'community laundry,' 'secured entrance,' 'security cameras,' 'surfboard storage,' 'bike storage,' and parking, along with utilities included in the maintenance fee. Several listings explicitly list building features (e.g., 'Building features resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras') without any reference to a spa or hot tub. Given how heavily these units are marketed as resort-zoned, legal short-term rentals, a whirlpool or hot tub would likely be advertised if present. The complete absence of any such mention in all 26 remarks strongly indicates the building does not have a whirlpool/hot tub/spa feature.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki / 2465 Kuhio Ave, none mention a pool or any related terms such as 'swimming pool,' 'lap pool,' or 'heated pool.' Instead, building amenities are repeatedly described as including a resident or live-in manager, secured entrance, security cameras, community laundry, surfboard and bike storage, and parking (e.g., 'Building features resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras' and 'Surf racks ON the building property'). Given how consistently agents list amenities and how attractive a pool would be for a resort-zoned, short-term-rental-friendly Waikiki building, its absence from all 26 remarks strongly suggests there is no pool. The silence on this feature, despite detailed amenity descriptions, supports setting the pool feature to false with high confidence.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, none mention a pool at all, let alone a heated one. The remarks repeatedly focus on other building amenities such as a resident or site manager, community laundry, secured entrance, security cameras, surfboard storage, bike storage, and parking, but never reference any kind of swimming pool. Given how prominently a pool—especially a heated pool—would typically be marketed in a resort-zoned, short-term-rental-friendly Waikiki building, its complete absence from all descriptions is notable. Phrases like 'Building features resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras' and repeated amenity lists are consistent and never add a pool. This strong, consistent silence across many units suggests the building does not have a heated pool.

There is no mention of a pool in the remarks, and the building context indicates pool=False. Per rules, I retained the current value (no pool) with low confidence due to absence of affirming remarks.

Across the listing corpus, there are virtually no public remarks indicating in-unit washer/dryer—only 1 of 20 current listings has WASHER/DRYER in inclusions while prior analysis (high confidence) found remarks describing only shared/community laundry. Given consistent remarks and widespread COMLAU amenity usage, there is high confidence that units do not generally include in-unit laundry.

Community/shared laundry is repeatedly and explicitly mentioned in public remarks (phrases such as "community laundry" and "shared laundry" appear throughout) and the COMLAU amenity is present on 20 of 20 current listings, providing strong, consistent evidence across multiple agents that the building has shared laundry facilities.

Remarks repeatedly reference community/shared laundry but contain no mention of coin-op, card operation, quarters, or any paid laundry language. I searched for 'coin-op', 'quarters', 'card', 'paid laundry', and similar terms and found no evidence.

Multiple remarks list 'community laundry' or 'shared laundry' as a building amenity, but there is no language indicating laundry facilities are located on every floor. I searched for phrases such as 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found none.

Building-level parking is well supported: MLS data shows parking on 20/20 recent listings and the remarks repeatedly state 'one covered parking stall' or 'assigned parking stall'. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent listings and reinforced by building amenity mentions (surfboard/bike storage plus parking).

Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported: 19/20 MLS entries include ASSIGN and the remarks repeatedly state 'assigned parking stall' or 'one assigned parking stall'. Multiple listings/agents reference an assigned stall, so this appears to be a building feature rather than a single-unit anomaly.

Covered parking is explicitly mentioned in multiple listings. At least 6 of 26 listings clearly state '1 covered parking stall,' '1 covered parking spot,' or 'one covered secured parking stall,' indicating that the building provides covered parking options. Examples include: '2 bedroom, 2 bath unit with 1 covered parking,' 'Unit comes with 1 covered parking stall,' and 'Secured building with one covered secured parking stall.' Other listings reference parking more generically (e.g., 'parking stall in a gated and secured lot' and 'one assigned parking stall on the top level'), which is consistent with a structured, likely covered parking facility. With repeated, explicit references to covered parking across several independent listings, it is clear that the building has covered parking as a feature.

Public remarks repeatedly state the unit 'includes one assigned/covered parking stall' or 'assigned parking stall', which indicates the parking is provided with the unit. The listings do not explicitly use the word 'deeded', so confidence is moderate.

Across 26 listings for this building, none mention any form of electric vehicle infrastructure such as 'EV charging', 'electric vehicle charging', 'EV stations', 'Tesla charging', or 'charging stations'. Parking is repeatedly described only as 'one assigned parking stall', '1 covered parking', 'one covered secured parking stall', or 'parking stall in a gated and secured lot', with no indication of charging capability. The remarks do highlight many other building features (surfboard storage, bike storage, community laundry, resident/site manager, security cameras), suggesting that EV charging would likely be mentioned if present. Because 0 of 26 listings reference EV-related amenities despite detailed amenity descriptions, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building does not have EV charging stations.

Remarks consistently describe an assigned/covered parking stall included with the unit and do not reference any monthly parking fee. Because no fee is mentioned, the parking fee is unknown from these remarks.

Across 26 listings, parking is consistently described only as 'one assigned parking stall,' '1 covered parking,' 'dedicated parking space,' or 'one covered secured parking stall,' all clearly tied to the unit itself. There are no mentions of 'guest parking,' 'visitor parking,' or any similar concept in any of the remarks. Several listings list building features in detail—'resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, security cameras, surfboard storage, bike storage'—yet still do not mention guest or visitor parking, which suggests it is not available. Because multiple detailed amenity descriptions omit any reference to guest parking, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building does not offer dedicated guest parking.

Controlled/secured parking access is supported: 14/20 MLS entries list secured entry and the public remarks include terms like 'secured entrance', 'security cameras', 'gated and secured lot', and 'covered secured parking stall'. Multiple agent remarks corroborate that parking access is controlled.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, parking is mentioned frequently but never described as tandem. Remarks consistently state 'one assigned parking stall,' 'one covered parking stall,' 'a dedicated parking space,' or 'one covered secured parking stall' with no qualifiers such as 'tandem,' 'back-to-back,' or 'shared stall.' Several listings emphasize parking as a 'huge bonus' or 'highly coveted,' suggesting standard individual stalls rather than a tandem configuration that would typically be disclosed due to its inconvenience. Because 0 of 26 listings reference tandem parking despite detailed amenity descriptions, the evidence points strongly to non-tandem parking. Therefore, the building-level feature 'parking_tandem' should be set to false with high confidence.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, none mention valet parking, valet service, or attended parking, despite frequent detailed references to parking and building amenities. Many listings specify '1 covered parking stall,' 'assigned parking stall,' or 'parking stall in a gated and secured lot,' which implies self-parking rather than valet. Building features are repeatedly described as including a resident or site manager, secured entrance, security cameras, surfboard and bike storage, and community laundry, but never any form of valet service. Given how consistently amenities are marketed for this resort-zoned, short-term-rental-friendly building, the absence of any valet-related terms strongly suggests valet parking is not offered. Therefore, the building-level feature 'parking_valet' is best set to false with high confidence.

I searched for phrases like 'parking waitlist' or 'waiting list' and found none. The remarks describe assigned parking for the unit, so there is no evidence of a building-level parking waitlist.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, several mention general building security but none reference keyed or fob-access elevators. Security-related phrases include 'secured entrance,' 'secure entry,' 'secured, PET FRIENDLY building,' and 'secured building with one covered secured parking stall,' as well as mentions of 'security cameras.' However, there are zero explicit mentions of a 'keyed elevator,' 'fob elevator,' or any form of restricted elevator access. Given that multiple agents highlight other security features without noting elevator access control, it is likely that the elevator is not keyed or fob-restricted. Therefore, the feature is set to false with moderate confidence based on the absence of any direct evidence in a relatively large remarks set.

Several listings reference a secured entry and security cameras, but none explicitly describe card/fob/keycard access. I searched for 'key card', 'fob', 'card reader', 'keycard', 'electronic access' and found no evidence.

Across 26 listings, several security-related features are mentioned repeatedly, but none reference a security guard or on-site security personnel. Multiple listings describe a 'secured' building or 'secured entrance' and note a 'gated and secured lot' and 'secured, PET FRIENDLY building,' as well as 'security cameras.' One listing explicitly states: 'Building features resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras,' and another: 'secured building with one covered secured parking stall.' The presence of cameras, secure entry, and a resident/site manager is consistently highlighted, but there is no mention of a guard, 24-hour security, or staffed security desk in any remark. Given this consistent silence on guards despite detailed amenity descriptions, it is likely the building does not have a security guard service.

Listings repeatedly note a resident manager and secured entry/cameras, but there is no language indicating an organized security patrol service. I searched for 'security patrol', 'roving security', 'patrol service', and related terms and found none.

Out of 26 listings, at least 4 explicitly mention video-related security features. Several listings state the building has 'security cameras' or 'Building features ... secured entrance, and security cameras' and 'secure entry, and security cameras,' directly confirming video surveillance. These mentions are consistent across different units and agents, indicating a building-level feature rather than a unit-specific one. No listing contradicts the presence of cameras, and multiple others describe it as a 'secured' building, which aligns with the explicit camera references. Given the repeated, explicit mentions of security cameras in the remarks corpus, it is highly likely the building has video surveillance.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, none mention central air, central AC, HVAC, forced air, or fan-coil systems. Instead, multiple listings explicitly state the use of window units, e.g., several units are described as having 'window air' or 'window A/C (2),' indicating cooling is provided individually rather than by a building-wide central system. The remarks repeatedly detail other included utilities in the maintenance fee—'electricity, gas, hot water, water, sewer, and common area electricity'—but never reference central air conditioning despite extensive descriptions of features. Given that at least 4 listings specifically call out window A/C and none counter this with any form of central system, the evidence strongly suggests the building does not have central AC. The consistent silence on central air, combined with explicit window A/C mentions, supports setting this feature to false with high confidence.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, none mention split AC, mini-split, ductless, or split system air conditioning. Instead, multiple listings explicitly state 'window air' or 'window A/C (2)' for the studio and 1-bedroom portions (e.g., 'furnished with refrigerator and window air' and 'Furnishings include refrigerator, gas range, disposal, window A/C (2)'). These repeated references indicate that the building’s typical cooling solution is window units rather than ductless mini-splits. Given the number of listings and the consistency of window A/C mentions without any split-system references, it is very likely that split AC is not a building feature. Therefore, the feature is set to false with high confidence.

MLS inclusions indicate ACWIUN on 19/20 listings and numerous remark blocks explicitly mention window air conditioning (phrases include "window air", "window A/C (2)", and "furnished with ... window air"). Evidence is strong across multiple listings/agents rather than a single copy-paste instance, so the building should be marked as offering window AC units.

16 of 20 current MLS listings for 2465 Kuhio Ave have the CONCRE construction_materials box checked, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'concrete', 'concrete building', or similar. Evidence is therefore driven by MLS checkbox data (multiple agents) rather than explicit remarks; confidence is moderate (implied from repeated checkbox usage rather than explicit confirmations in remarks).

Across the provided public remarks (many listings/agents), there are zero mentions of 'double wall', 'double-wall construction', or 'two walls'. Only 1 of 20 MLS checkboxes currently lists DOUWAL, appearing isolated versus the broad lack of remarks; given consistent absence in agent remarks and historical high confidence in that absence, the building is treated as not having double-wall construction.

Across all 26 listings in the remarks corpus, none mention the building being constructed with hollow tile or use phrases like 'hollow tile' or 'hollow tile construction.' The remarks focus heavily on resort zoning, legal short-term rentals, unit flexibility (2-bedroom or separate 1-bedroom and studio), renovations, views, and included utilities and assessments. Structural or construction details are largely absent, and where building characteristics are mentioned, they relate to security, parking, and amenities rather than materials. Given that 0 of 26 listings reference hollow tile despite extensive marketing language, it is reasonable to conclude that hollow tile construction is not a noted feature of this building. Therefore, the feature is set to false with high confidence based on the complete lack of explicit evidence.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, none explicitly mention the building’s construction as 'masonry' or 'stucco,' nor any phrase like 'masonry and stucco.' The remarks focus heavily on resort zoning, legal short-term rentals, unit flexibility, parking, and a special assessment 'for repairs and painting of the building,' but do not describe the structural materials. Given how often other features are repeated (e.g., 'secured, PET FRIENDLY building,' 'surfboard storage, bike storage, community laundry'), the complete absence of terms like 'stucco' or 'masonry' across all 26 suggests this is not a marketed or notable characteristic. Because the instructions require basing the decision only on explicit evidence in the remarks, the feature must be set to false rather than assumed. The confidence is relatively high due to the large number of listings and consistent silence on this specific construction detail.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki / 2465 Kuhio Ave, none of the remarks mention steel construction or a steel frame, nor related phrases like 'steel frame construction'. The descriptions focus on zoning, short-term rental legality, layouts, renovations, amenities, and a special assessment for 'repairs and painting of the building,' but never specify the structural system. In this market, when steel framing is a selling point, it is often explicitly called out, and its complete absence in all 26 remarks suggests it is not being marketed as a notable feature. Because there are zero explicit references out of 26 and no indirect hints toward steel framing, the most reasonable conclusion based on the provided text is that the building should not be tagged as having steel frame construction.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, none of the remarks explicitly mention a 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation,' nor do they reference any foundation type at all. The descriptions focus on zoning, short-term rental legality, renovations, layouts, parking, and amenities like 'surfboard storage,' 'community laundry,' and a 'secured, PET FRIENDLY building,' but are silent on construction details. Given the instruction to rely only on explicit evidence in the remarks, this absence suggests the feature is not documented for this building. Because high-rise Waikiki condos are often concrete structures, one might infer a slab foundation, but that would be outside the allowed evidence-based reasoning. Therefore, the feature is set to false due to lack of direct mention, with moderate confidence reflecting that this is based on omission rather than a contrary statement.

No analysis available

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, none of the remarks mention 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction,' nor do they reference any wood-related structural characteristics. The descriptions focus on zoning, short-term rental legality, renovations, layouts, amenities, and a special assessment 'for repairs and painting of the building,' but never specify the construction type. Given how often agents highlight concrete or masonry construction in Honolulu when relevant, the complete absence of any wood-frame reference in all 26 listings suggests the building is likely not marketed as wood frame. Because there is no explicit contrary statement (e.g., 'concrete' or 'steel'), the determination is based on silence and typical local building patterns rather than direct evidence, so confidence is moderate rather than high.

Across 26 listings, multiple units are explicitly described as 'HIGH FLOOR UNIT' or having '2 separate lanais, both with ocean, Diamond Head, Waikiki City life Views,' which clearly indicates that the residential structure is built above ground level. Several listings reference being 'one block away' or 'two blocks away' from Waikiki Beach and emphasize views of the city, mountains, and ocean from the units, all of which imply a multi-story, above-ground building rather than any below-grade or underground construction. No listing mentions any below-ground residential space, basement living, or subterranean construction. The repeated emphasis on high floors, views, and lanais (balconies) in at least 5–7 of the 26 listings strongly supports that the building is constructed above ground. Given this consistent pattern and absence of contrary evidence, the feature is best marked as present.

Across all 26 listings, none of the remarks explicitly mention brick construction or a brick exterior. The descriptions focus on interior renovations, resort zoning, short-term rental legality, parking, lanais, and building repairs/painting, but never use terms like 'brick exterior,' 'brick construction,' or 'brick-and-mortar.' Given this many unit descriptions for the same building, the complete absence of any brick-related language strongly suggests that brick is not a notable construction feature here. Because the instructions require basing the determination only on explicit evidence in the remarks, and that evidence is entirely lacking, the most supportable conclusion is that the building should not be marked as brick construction.

Across 26 listings for Kuhio at Waikiki, none mention 'single wall construction,' 'single wall,' or similar phrases like 'old Hawaiian style single wall' that are typically used to flag this feature in Hawaii. Instead, remarks focus on resort zoning, short-term rental legality, renovations, layouts, and amenities such as 'secured building,' 'concrete'-type implications like painting and repairs, but never construction type. Given how common it is for agents to explicitly note single-wall construction when present—especially in older Hawaii buildings—the complete absence of such language in all 26 listings strongly suggests the building is not single-wall. Several listings repeat building-level details (fees, assessments, amenities) without ever referencing single-wall construction, reinforcing this inference. Therefore, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building is not constructed with single-wall construction.

Multiple listings repeatedly and explicitly state that short-term/vacation rentals are legal in this resort-zoned building. This is clearly supported throughout the public remarks.

Although the listings describe resort zoning and hotel-like rental performance, there is no evidence the building participates in a hotel rental pool or has a hotel-managed program. Therefore hotel-pool participation is not supported by the remarks.

The public remarks promote optional and flexible short-term rental use and explicitly describe owner control over renting decisions. There is no mention of a required or mandatory hotel rental pool, so mandatory participation is false with high confidence.

Across the 26 listings, none of the remarks explicitly mention fee simple, FS, leasehold, LH, or any phrasing like 'owns land' or 'land included.' The remarks focus heavily on resort zoning, legal short-term rentals, unit configuration (2-bedroom plus studio), parking, maintenance fees, and a special assessment, but are silent on land tenure. In Hawaii listings, fee simple is typically called out as a selling point (e.g., 'Fee Simple' or 'FS') when applicable, especially in Waikiki, where leasehold is common. The consistent omission of any tenure language across all listings suggests that fee simple ownership is unlikely for these units. Because there are zero explicit references to FS or LH, I infer the building does not have clearly identified fee simple units based on the provided remarks, but this is somewhat uncertain due to the lack of direct statements.

Across all 26 listings in the remarks corpus, none mention any leasehold-related terms such as 'leasehold,' 'LH,' 'leased land,' 'land lease,' 'lease rent,' or 'CPR lease.' The remarks focus heavily on resort zoning, legal short-term rentals, special assessments, maintenance fees, and building/location features, but are completely silent on land tenure. In Hawaii listings, leasehold status is typically called out explicitly because it materially affects value and buyer considerations, so its absence across this many units is meaningful. Multiple listings repeat similar boilerplate language about fees and assessments without any lease-related charges or lease expiration dates. Given the consistent omission of leasehold indicators in a relatively large sample of units from the same building, the evidence points to the building not having leasehold units, or at least none among the 26 listings reviewed.

There is no indication in the public remarks that the property is on leasehold land or any lease expiry year is mentioned. Because no year is given, the expiry is unknown.

I searched the remarks for explicit VA language and found none. There is no evidence in the provided public remarks that the building is VA-approved.

I looked for explicit language indicating HOA-provided full/walls-in insurance and found none in the public remarks. With no explicit statement and no prior verified value, this is set to false with medium confidence (lack of mention implies it was not advertised).

Across all 26 listings in the remarks corpus, none mention fire sprinklers, a sprinkler system, or any kind of fire suppression feature, despite many detailed descriptions of building amenities and systems. Commonly repeated building features include a resident or site manager, secured entrance, security cameras, surfboard and bike storage, community laundry, and covered/assigned parking (e.g., 'Building features resident manager, community laundry, secured entrance, and security cameras'). Several listings also go into detail about what the maintenance fee covers—'electricity, gas, hot water, water, sewer, and common area electricity'—without ever referencing sprinklers. Given how consistently other safety and building systems are highlighted, the complete absence of any sprinkler-related terms across 26 separate remarks strongly suggests that a fire sprinkler system is not a notable or present feature. Therefore, the most reasonable determination based on the provided text is that the building does not have fire sprinklers.

I searched remarks for explicit FLSE/fire life safety statements (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified') and found none. Because there is no explicit mention and no existing verified value, this is recorded as false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests it was not highlighted).

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Strong evidence that the building offers ocean views: current remarks explicitly state "VIEW of Diamond Head and Ocean" and note lanais with "a glimpse of the ocean" across multiple agent remarks. Historical MLS summary also had High confidence for ocean views and several recent listings confirm it, indicating some units in the building have ocean views.

Multiple remarks explicitly mention mountain/Diamond Head views (phrases like "city and mountain views" and repeated references to Diamond Head), and historical data previously rated mountain-view presence as High confidence. Evidence across listings indicates some units offer mountain views.

Out of 26 listings, at least 3 explicitly mention Diamond Head views. One listing states a 'HIGH FLOOR UNIT offers a VIEW of Diamond Head and Ocean!', and another notes 'On major bus lines, Diamond Head, Honolulu Zoo, Kapiolani Park' in the immediate area, reinforcing the building’s Diamond Head orientation. Most decisively, two separate listings describe '2 separate lanais, both with ocean, Diamond Head, Waikiki City life Views' (appearing twice in the corpus), clearly indicating that multiple units in the building enjoy Diamond Head views. No listing states that views are limited in a way that would exclude Diamond Head, and several units are described as high-floor, which is consistent with such views. Given multiple explicit references across different listings, the building is very likely to have Diamond Head views.

Several remarks explicitly state "city and mountain views" and "Waikiki City life Views," supported by historical high-confidence data. Multiple agent remarks across listings indicate the building offers units with city views.

Across 26 listings, views are described multiple times but never as coastline, shoreline, or coastal views. Two listings explicitly mention '2 separate lanais, both with ocean, Diamond Head, Waikiki City life Views,' and another notes a 'HIGH FLOOR UNIT offers a VIEW of Diamond Head and Ocean,' which indicates ocean views but not specifically coastline/shoreline panoramas. No remarks use terms like 'coastline view,' 'shoreline view,' or 'coastal view,' and most other listings are silent on views or focus on city/mountain aspects. Given the explicit ocean view mentions without any coastline-specific language in any of the 26 listings, the evidence supports that the building has ocean views but not clearly marketed coastline views. Therefore, view_coastline is set to false with high confidence.

Across 26 listings, views are described multiple times but never as garden, courtyard, or landscaped views. Instead, several listings explicitly mention 'city and mountain views' and 'ocean, Diamond Head, Waikiki City life Views,' indicating an urban and ocean-oriented outlook. No listing uses terms like 'garden view,' 'courtyard view,' or similar language. Given this repeated emphasis on city/ocean/Diamond Head views and complete silence about any garden or courtyard aspect, it is very likely the building does not offer notable garden views. Therefore, the building-level feature view_garden is set to false with high confidence.

Across 26 listings, views are described multiple times but only as 'city and mountain views' and 'ocean, Diamond Head, Waikiki City life Views'; there is no mention of a golf course, fairway, or greens in any remark. For example, one unit notes '2 separate lanais, both with ocean, Diamond Head, Waikiki City life Views' and another highlights 'two private lanais with city and mountain views.' Several other listings omit view descriptions entirely, focusing instead on location near Waikiki Beach, shopping, and resort zoning. The complete absence of any golf-related view language in a relatively large sample strongly suggests the building does not offer notable golf course views. Therefore, view_golf_course is set to false with high confidence.

Across 26 listings, none mention a marina, harbor, yacht harbor, Ala Wai harbor, or canal view. Only 2 of 26 listings explicitly describe views, and both specify 'city and mountain views' or 'ocean, Diamond Head, Waikiki City life Views' with no reference to any marina or harbor. Given how frequently views are used as selling points in Waikiki, the absence of any marina-related view language across the corpus strongly suggests the building does not offer notable marina views. No listing contradicts this by implying or stating a harbor/marina outlook. Therefore, the most supported conclusion is that view_marina = FALSE for this building.

Across 26 listings, none mention sunrise views, morning sun, or eastern exposure, even though many highlight views and other positives. Two listings explicitly describe '2 separate lanais, both with ocean, Diamond Head, Waikiki City life Views,' but do not reference sunrise or morning light. Another listing notes 'city and mountain views' from two private lanais, again without any sunrise-related language. Given how frequently agents market view aspects in Waikiki, the complete absence of terms like 'sunrise' or 'morning sun' in all 26 remarks strongly suggests this is not a notable building feature. Therefore, the most reasonable conclusion is that sunrise views are not a characteristic selling point of this building.

Across 26 listings, none explicitly mention sunset views, evening sun, western exposure, or similar phrases. View descriptions that do appear focus on 'city and mountain views' and, in 2 listings, 'ocean, Diamond Head, Waikiki City life views,' but still do not reference sunsets or west-facing orientation. Several units are described as high-floor or with multiple lanais, yet agents highlight other aspects (resort zoning, rental flexibility, proximity to beach) rather than any sunset feature. Given how marketable sunset views are in Waikiki, their complete absence in all 26 remarks strongly suggests this is not a notable building feature. Therefore, the building is assessed as not having a recognized sunset view amenity.

Across 26 listings in this building, none mention cemetery views or anything resembling phrases like 'cemetery view' or 'overlooks cemetery.' Instead, when views are described, they are consistently positive and specific: several listings highlight 'city and mountain views,' others note 'VIEW of Diamond Head and Ocean' or 'ocean, Diamond Head, Waikiki City life views.' This repeated emphasis on other view types, with zero references to a cemetery, strongly suggests that cemetery views are not a selling point and likely not present. Given the volume of listings and the marketing focus on views, if cemetery views existed, at least one of the 26 would likely mention or allude to them. Therefore, the building is determined not to have cemetery views.

While many listings highlight ocean, Diamond Head, and city views from lanais, none explicitly say fireworks can be viewed from the unit or building. I searched for 'fireworks', 'Friday night fireworks', 'watch fireworks from', and similar phrases and found no mentions.

Geographic designation determined by building address. This is not derived from MLS listing data.

Out of 26 listings, at least 3 explicitly describe the building as pet friendly. One listing states, “Secured, pet-friendly building just steps from Waikiki Beach,” while another notes, “Kuhio at Waikiki is a secured, PET FRIENDLY building conveniently located around eateries, entertainment and shopping.” A third repeats, “Kuhio at Waikiki is a secured, PET FRIENDLY building conveniently located around eateries, entertainment and shopping.” None of the 26 listings mention any prohibition on pets or use phrases like “no pets allowed.” Because multiple independent listings clearly and positively identify the building as pet friendly and there is no contradictory language, the building-level feature 'pets_allowed' is set to true with very high confidence.

Strong evidence that the building has an on-site/resident manager: multiple recent remarks explicitly state phrases like "Resident manager on site," "live-in manager," "building includes a resident manager," and "dedicated manager." At least 15 separate listing remarks in this set reference on-site or resident management, and combined with historical MLS checkbox data (18/20 had RESMAN) the evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings.

Across 26 listings, many emphasize that the building is resort-zoned and allows legal short-term or vacation rentals (e.g., 'RESORT ZONED & SHORT TERM RENTALS ARE LEGAL' and 'legal short-term rental in the heart of Waikiki'), but none mention hotel-style operations or a hotel management structure. There are no references to a hotel front desk, hotel rental pool, hotel program, or being managed by a hotel. The building is described instead with typical condo features such as a resident or site manager, community laundry, surfboard storage, and security cameras. One listing notes it 'rents like a hotel,' but this is clearly descriptive of income potential, not an explicit statement of condotel operations. Because the required trigger terms ('condotel,' 'condo-hotel,' or explicit hotel management/rental pool language) are entirely absent, the condotel feature should be set to false.

No specific verification method available for coop. The declared value is retained as provided. Manual review recommended.