2233 Ala Wai

14 of 14 listings report year built as 1973, matching the declared value. This is a well-established data point from MLS records.

One listing explicitly states that its unit is on the '10th floor,' and another describes an end-unit on the 'TOP floor' with no higher units above it. No listing gives a direct building description like 'X-story building,' but the repeated emphasis on a rarely available top floor and the range of views (including Diamond Head and some ocean) suggest a mid‑rise rather than a high‑rise tower. Typical Waikiki buildings with similar descriptions and amenities (heated pool, 3 units per floor, guest parking) often fall in the low‑ to mid‑teens in total floors. Given the explicit 10th-floor reference and the context of a 'top floor' unit, a 14-floor building is a reasonable, though inferred, estimate. Because this is not directly stated and relies on contextual inference, the confidence is moderate rather than high.

The unit total value of 51 is a building-level attribute that cannot be directly verified from individual unit listings. This information typically comes from building documentation or county records.

I looked for phrases like "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or other ownership-level disclosures, but found none in the remarks. Since there is no contradictory evidence, the current value of 45.0 is retained with low confidence.

I looked for explicit elevator counts such as "1 elevator," "2 elevators," or similar phrasing, but none appeared in the remarks. The only evidence is that the building installed new elevators, which confirms existence but not the number.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Across 14 listings, none state that central air conditioning is included in the maintenance/HOA fees. The only explicit fee description is that the 'HOA fee includes water, sewer, and hot water' with no mention of AC. Air conditioning is mentioned only at the unit level, e.g., 'Window AC keeps you cool' and 'air conditioning throughout,' which suggests individual systems rather than a central building system included in fees. No listing references AC as part of HOA or maintenance inclusions, despite several discussing building upgrades and amenities in detail. Given this consistent silence on AC in fees and the presence of unit-specific AC, it is most likely that central AC is not included in the maintenance fees.

Across 14 listings, none mention cable TV being included in the maintenance/HOA fees, even when fees and inclusions are discussed. One listing explicitly states, 'HOA fee includes water, sewer, and hot water' with no reference to cable, which is typically listed if included. Several remarks focus on building upgrades, amenities, and what fees or assessments cover (e.g., 're-piping has been completed for this unit. No assessment'), but still omit any mention of cable service. Given how often other included utilities and services are specified, the consistent silence on cable strongly suggests it is not part of the maintenance fees. Therefore, the building is likely not providing cable TV as an included fee component.

Common-area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee, based on OTCOEX being present in 12 of 15 current MLS entries. No remarks explicitly confirm this item, so the evidence looks like MLS checkbox consistency rather than narrative verification.

Across 14 listings, none mention cooperative or co-op taxes being included in the maintenance/HOA fees, nor do they use any language like 'co-op tax' or 'coop taxes included.' The only explicit fee description is in one listing stating, 'HOA fee includes water, sewer, and hot water,' which lists specific inclusions but omits any reference to taxes. Several listings discuss HOA concessions and maintenance fee credits (e.g., '1X MAINTENANCE FEE CREDIT' and 'Seller will advance to BUYER... 6 x October 2024 HOA'), yet still do not mention taxes as part of those fees. The building is consistently described as a 'condo' and not a cooperative, which further suggests that cooperative taxes are not relevant here. Given the complete absence of any tax-inclusion language in a relatively large sample, the most reasonable conclusion is that maintenance fees do not include cooperative taxes.

Across 14 listings, only one explicitly describes what the HOA covers: 'HOA fee includes water, sewer, and hot water,' with no mention of electricity. None of the other 13 listings reference electricity being included in maintenance fees or HOA dues. Given that agents often highlight utilities included in fees as a selling point, the consistent silence on electricity plus the explicit narrower list of included utilities in one listing suggests that electricity is not part of the maintenance fee. If electricity were included, it would likely appear alongside water and sewer in that description. Therefore, the building-level feature 'fee_inc_electricity' is best set to false based on the available remarks.

Across 14 listings for this building, only one explicitly describes what the HOA covers, stating that the 'HOA fee includes water, sewer, and hot water' with no mention of gas. None of the other 13 listings reference gas being included in the maintenance or HOA fees, nor do they mention gas service at all. If gas were included, it would typically be highlighted alongside water, sewer, or electricity, especially in a competitive market like Waikiki. The explicit partial list of inclusions that omits gas, combined with complete silence about gas in all other remarks, suggests that gas is not part of the maintenance fee. Therefore, the most reasonable conclusion is that maintenance fees do not include gas for this building.

Hot water is very likely included in the maintenance fee. Current MLS data shows HOTWAT in 10 of 15 listings, and the remarks explicitly say, 'HOA fee includes water, sewer, and hot water.' That direct phrasing makes this a high-confidence building feature.

Across 14 listings, only one explicitly details what the HOA covers, stating that the 'HOA fee includes water, sewer, and hot water' with no mention of internet or Wi-Fi. None of the other 13 listings reference internet being included in maintenance fees or HOA dues, nor do they mention building-provided Wi-Fi as an amenity. Given that agents often highlight included utilities and services, the consistent silence about internet strongly suggests it is not part of the maintenance fee. The repeated focus on other features (pet-friendly, pool, storage, parking, repiping, etc.) without any internet inclusion further supports this conclusion. Therefore, the building is most likely one where residents pay separately for internet service.

Across 14 listings, none mention marina access or boat slip fees being included in the maintenance or HOA fees. The only explicit HOA/fee detail is that the 'HOA fee includes water, sewer, and hot water' and another listing offers a '1X MAINTENANCE FEE CREDIT' without tying it to any marina-related amenity. Multiple listings emphasize other building features such as a heated pool, bike racks, secured surfboard room, guest parking, storage, and pet-friendliness, but there is no reference to a marina, boat slips, or dock usage. Given the building’s consistent amenity descriptions across many units, the absence of any marina-related inclusion strongly suggests that marina access is not part of the maintenance fees. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

Sewer is included in the maintenance fee with high confidence. Current MLS data shows SEWER in 14 of 15 listings, and the remarks directly confirm it with the phrase 'HOA fee includes water, sewer, and hot water.' This appears consistently across the building's listings.

Water is clearly included in the maintenance fee. Every current MLS listing reviewed (15/15) includes WATER, and the remarks explicitly confirm it with 'HOA fee includes water, sewer, and hot water.' This is strong building-level evidence.

Across 14 listings, none mention any BBQ, barbecue, grill, or outdoor grilling facilities, despite many detailed amenity descriptions. Multiple listings explicitly list building features such as 'heated pool,' 'guest parking,' 'bike racks,' 'secured surfboard room,' 'resident manager,' and 'assigned storage unit,' but no listing adds BBQ to these amenity lists. For example, one notes 'resort-style amenities including a heated pool, extra storage, bike racks, & a secured surfboard room' and another mentions 'pool and 4 guest parking' without any reference to BBQ. Given how often amenities are enumerated and the complete absence of BBQ-related terms, it is likely the building does not offer BBQ facilities. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

Multiple listings explicitly mention bicycle storage facilities in the building. The first listing notes 'resort-style amenities including a heated pool, extra storage, bike racks, & a secured surfboard room,' and the second reiterates 'heated swimming pool, bike racks and secured surfboard room.' Another listing describes 'access to a secure bike and surfboard storage area,' and yet another highlights 'pool and bike room' as part of the building amenities. In total, at least 4 of 14 listings clearly reference bike racks, a bike room, or secure bike storage. These repeated, explicit mentions strongly indicate that the building provides dedicated bike storage facilities.

Across 14 listings, none mention any boat-related facilities such as a dock, marina, boat slip, or mooring, despite frequent references to the nearby Ala Wai Canal and its views. Multiple listings highlight amenities like a 'heated pool,' 'bike racks,' 'secured surfboard room,' 'guest parking,' and 'storage,' but there is no indication of boat storage or dock access. Several remarks emphasize walking or strolling along the Ala Wai Canal (e.g., 'Take a morning stroll along the Ala Wai just steps from your front door'), framing it as a scenic and recreational walking area rather than a boating facility. Given how prominently water views are marketed, the absence of any mention of boat docks or marina access strongly suggests the building does not offer this feature. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

Across 14 listings for this building, none mention any kind of car wash facility despite detailed descriptions of amenities. The remarks repeatedly highlight features such as a heated pool, guest parking, bike room/racks, secured surfboard storage, storage units, resident manager, new pipes/roof/elevators, and pet-friendliness (e.g., 'pool and 4 guest parking,' 'bike racks and secured surfboard room,' 'pool and bike room'). There are no references to a 'car wash,' 'auto wash,' 'vehicle wash area,' or similar terms. Given how consistently other building amenities are advertised, the absence of any mention of a car wash strongly suggests that this feature is not present. Therefore, the building is determined not to have car wash facilities.

Across all 14 listings, none mention a clubhouse, club house, community center, or recreation center, despite many detailed descriptions of building amenities. The remarks repeatedly highlight features such as a 'heated pool,' 'guest parking,' 'bike racks,' 'secured surfboard room,' 'storage unit,' and a 'resident manager,' but never reference any shared clubhouse-type facility. For example, one listing notes 'resort-style amenities including a heated pool, extra storage, bike racks, & a secured surfboard room' without adding a clubhouse, and another describes the building as 'well maintained' with 'pool and 4 guest parking' only. Given how often amenities are enumerated, the consistent omission of any clubhouse or community center strongly suggests the building does not have this feature. Therefore, the clubhouse feature is set to false with high confidence.

Across 14 listings, none mention a concierge, front desk service, or a staffed desk, even though they repeatedly highlight other building amenities and services. Commonly cited features include a 'heated pool,' 'extra storage,' 'bike racks,' 'secured surfboard room,' 'guest parking,' and a 'resident manager,' as well as security elements like 'building entry by fobs' and 'secured parking.' One listing explicitly notes a 'well maintained building with resident manager,' which suggests on-site management but not concierge service. In buildings that do offer concierge, listings almost always advertise it prominently, especially in a competitive market like Waikiki. The complete absence of any concierge-related terms in detailed amenity descriptions strongly indicates that this building does not have concierge service.

Across 14 listings for this building, none mention a dog park, dog run, or dedicated pet exercise area, despite multiple explicit references to the building being pet-friendly. Several listings highlight amenities in detail—'heated pool, extra storage, bike racks, & a secured surfboard room,' 'pool and 4 guest parking,' and 'pool and bike room'—but no pet-specific common area is ever described. One listing even notes a nearby 'great park across the street,' which is framed as a general park, not a building dog park. Given that 5+ listings emphasize pet-friendliness without once mentioning a dog park or pet area, it is likely that such a feature does not exist in this building.

Across 14 listings for this building, none mention a doorman, door attendant, or lobby attendant, despite many detailed references to other building features. The remarks repeatedly highlight amenities such as a 'heated pool,' 'bike racks,' 'secured surfboard room,' 'guest parking,' 'assigned parking,' and being 'pet friendly,' as well as security features like 'well-kept and secured buildings' and 'Building entry by fobs.' One listing notes a 'resident manager,' which is distinct from a doorman and typically indicates on-site management rather than staffed lobby service. Given the marketing detail and the consistent omission of any doorman/attendant language, it is likely the building does not have a doorman.

Across 14 listings, amenities are repeatedly described in detail, including a 'heated pool,' 'pool and 4 guest parking,' 'bike racks,' 'secured surfboard room,' 'storage unit,' and guest parking, but there is no mention of any exercise room, gym, fitness center, or workout room. Multiple remarks explicitly list building features such as 'resort-style amenities including a heated pool, extra storage, bike racks' and later 'heated swimming pool, bike racks and secured surfboard room' without ever adding a gym. Another listing notes 'pool and bike room' as key amenities, again omitting any fitness facility. Given how consistently amenities are enumerated and the total silence on an exercise room in all 14 listings, it is likely the building does not have one.

Across 14 listings for this building, none mention any form of limousine or car service, despite repeatedly detailing amenities such as a heated pool, guest parking, bike racks, surfboard storage, resident manager, secured parking, and pet-friendliness. Typical phrases that would indicate this feature—like 'limo service,' 'house car,' 'courtesy car,' 'complimentary car service,' or 'chauffeur'—are completely absent. Multiple listings describe the building as 'well maintained' and highlight upgrades like new elevators, pipes, and roof, suggesting agents are thorough in listing amenities, yet no car service is ever referenced. Given how prominently such a luxury service would usually be marketed if present, the consistent silence across all 14 remarks strongly indicates the building does not offer limousine or car service.

Across 14 listings for this building, none mention a meeting room, conference room, board room, hospitality room, or community room. The amenities are described repeatedly and consistently as including a heated pool, bike racks, secured surfboard room, storage units, guest parking, resident manager, and pet-friendly policies (e.g., 'resort-style amenities including a heated pool, extra storage, bike racks, & a secured surfboard room'). Several listings provide long amenity lists without omitting major features, yet no shared meeting or community room is ever referenced. Given how often other common-area facilities are highlighted, the absence of any mention of a meeting or conference space strongly suggests the building does not offer one. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

Multiple listings explicitly reference private outdoor spaces consistent with patios/decks. At least 4 of 14 listings mention a 'lanai' or 'balcony,' such as 'all from your private lanai,' 'sit on the lanai and enjoy the tradewinds and view,' and 'two private balconies' as well as 'hanging out on the balcony for your morning coffee.' These are unit-level outdoor deck/patio-style spaces that strongly imply the building is constructed with such amenities as a standard feature. No listing contradicts the presence of these spaces, and several emphasize enjoying views from them. Given the repeated, explicit mentions across different units and stacks, it is highly likely the building has patio/deck (lanai/balcony) amenities.

Across 14 listings, none mention any on-site jogging or walking path as a building amenity. The remarks focus on views of the Ala Wai Canal and golf course, pet-friendliness, pool, storage, bike/surfboard rooms, guest parking, and proximity to shopping and dining. Two listings reference walking nearby—e.g., 'Take a morning stroll along the Ala Wai just steps from your front door' and 'Easy Walk to Shopping and Dining'—but these clearly describe public or neighborhood walking, not a dedicated jogging or fitness path within the condo property. Given the repeated, detailed amenity descriptions (heated pool, storage, bike room, etc.) without any mention of a jogging or walking path, it is likely the building does not offer this feature. The absence of such a notable amenity in all 14 descriptions supports setting this feature to false with relatively high confidence.

Across 14 listings for this building, none mention a children's playground, kids play area, tot lot, or any similar feature. The amenities that are repeatedly highlighted include a 'heated pool,' 'bike racks,' 'secured surfboard room,' 'guest parking,' 'storage unit,' and the building being 'pet friendly,' but there is no reference to any play structure or playground. One listing notes a 'great park across the street,' which suggests outdoor recreation is nearby but not an on-site playground. Given how consistently other amenities are marketed, the absence of any playground mention in all 14 remarks strongly indicates the building does not have this feature. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

Across 14 listings, none mention any kind of yard, fenced yard, or private ground-level outdoor space; all outdoor references are to elevated features like a 'private lanai,' 'two private balconies,' or simply 'balcony' and views. The building is clearly a high-rise Waikiki condo with amenities such as a heated pool, bike/surfboard storage, guest parking, and storage units, but no listing suggests ground-level yard access or enclosed yard areas. Several listings emphasize walking to nearby parks and along the Ala Wai Canal (e.g., 'great park across the street' and 'Take a morning stroll along the Ala Wai just steps from your front door'), which further implies outdoor recreation is off-site rather than in a private yard. Given the consistency of descriptions and the absence of any yard-related language in all 14 remarks, it is very likely that the building does not offer private yard space.

Across 14 listings for this building, none mention a putting green or any golf practice facility, despite multiple detailed amenity descriptions. Amenities repeatedly cited include a 'heated pool,' 'pool,' 'bike racks,' 'secured surfboard room,' 'storage unit,' guest parking, resident manager, and pet-friendly policies, but never a putting green. Several listings reference golf only in the context of views, such as 'golf course greens' and 'golf course view,' clearly referring to nearby courses rather than an on-site feature. Given how prominently a putting green would typically be marketed if present, its complete absence from all remarks strongly suggests the building does not have one. Therefore, the feature is set to false with high confidence.

Across 14 listings, none mention a recreation area, recreation deck, amenity deck, or similar shared recreation space. Amenities are described repeatedly and consistently as including a heated pool, guest parking, bike racks/secure bike room, secured surfboard room, storage units, and resident manager (e.g., 'resort-style amenities including a heated pool, extra storage, bike racks, & a secured surfboard room' and 'pool and 4 guest parking'). Several listings list building features in detail without any reference to a recreation area, which suggests its absence. Given the thoroughness of amenity descriptions in at least 8–10 listings and the lack of any recreation-area-related terms, it is likely the building does not have a designated recreation area.

Across 14 listings, none mention a recreation room, rec room, game room, entertainment room, or multi-purpose room as a building amenity. Amenities are repeatedly described in detail—'heated pool,' 'extra storage,' 'bike racks,' 'secured surfboard room,' 'guest parking,' and 'resident manager'—but no listing adds any kind of recreation or game room to this list. For example, one listing notes 'resort-style amenities including a heated pool, extra storage, bike racks, & a secured surfboard room' and another mentions 'pool and 4 guest parking' without any reference to a rec room. Given how consistently amenities are marketed, the absence of any recreation-room-related term in all 14 remarks strongly suggests the building does not have this feature. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

Across 14 listings, none mention an on-site restaurant, café, or dining facility within the building itself. Dining is only referenced in terms of neighborhood access, such as being 'located just minutes from Waikiki’s world-class shopping, dining' and 'Easy Walk to Shopping and Dining,' and 'Walk to Waikiki beach, shops and restaurants,' which clearly refer to nearby area amenities, not in-building services. The building amenities that are repeatedly listed include a heated pool, bike racks, secured surfboard room, storage units, guest parking, resident manager, and pet-friendliness, but never any restaurant or café. Given this consistent omission across many detailed amenity descriptions, it is likely that the building does not have its own restaurant. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

Across 14 listings for this building, none mention any rooftop-related amenities or access, despite frequent and detailed discussion of other features. Multiple listings describe amenities such as a 'heated pool,' 'pool and 4 guest parking,' 'bike racks,' 'secured surfboard room,' and 'assigned storage unit,' but there is no reference to a roof deck, rooftop terrace, or rooftop access. Even the listing that highlights the 'PRESTIGIOUS and more expensive, rarely available TOP floor' focuses only on views and does not mention any rooftop facility. Given how consistently amenities are marketed in these remarks, the complete absence of rooftop mentions strongly suggests the building does not offer rooftop amenities.

Across 14 listings for this building, multiple unit remarks describe the amenities in detail, repeatedly mentioning a 'heated pool,' 'pool,' 'bike racks,' 'secured surfboard room,' storage, guest parking, and resident manager, but none mention a sauna, steam room, or any similar facility. For example, one listing notes 'resort-style amenities including a heated pool, extra storage, bike racks, & a secured surfboard room' and another says 'well-kept and secured buildings with heated swimming pool, bike racks and secured surfboard room,' yet still no sauna is referenced. Several other listings list building perks like 'Common area Heated Pool,' 'pool and 4 guest parking,' and 'pool and bike room' without adding sauna or steam room. Given how consistently amenities are enumerated and the complete absence of any sauna-related terms, it is likely the building does not have a sauna. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

There are multiple explicit mentions of storage units or extra storage across the 14 listings, indicating a building-level feature. One listing notes the building 'provides resort-style amenities including a heated pool, extra storage, bike racks, & a secured surfboard room,' clearly describing shared storage amenities. Another unit description states 'Additional perks include your very own storage unit and access to a secure bike and surfboard storage area' and highlights an 'Assigned Storage Unit,' suggesting dedicated storage lockers. A different listing mentions a 'nice size storage unit in basement,' and another refers to 'Secured storage in the parking garage area' plus a 'small storage closet in the garage.' With at least 4 of 14 listings explicitly referencing storage units or secured extra storage, it is very likely that the building offers storage units/lockers as a standard amenity.

Multiple listings clearly confirm surfboard storage facilities. The remarks repeatedly mention a secured or secure bike-and-surfboard storage room, which is strong evidence for this feature.

Across 14 listings for this building, none mention a tennis court or any tennis-related facilities. Amenities are repeatedly described in detail, including a 'heated pool,' 'pool and 4 guest parking,' 'bike racks,' 'secured surfboard room,' 'storage unit,' and being 'pet friendly,' but there is no reference to tennis at all. Several remarks explicitly market the building’s resort-style or extensive amenities (e.g., 'resort-style amenities including a heated pool, extra storage, bike racks'), which makes the omission of a tennis court notable if one existed. The consistency of amenity descriptions across many units without any tennis mention strongly suggests the building does not have tennis courts. Therefore, the feature is set to false with high confidence.

Across 14 listings for this building, none mention a trash chute, garbage chute, or refuse chute, despite many detailed amenity descriptions. The remarks repeatedly highlight features like a 'heated pool,' 'bike racks,' 'secured surfboard room,' 'extra storage,' and 'washer/dryer in the unit,' but are silent on any chute system. Given how commonly agents call out trash chutes when present in high-rise condos, this consistent omission across all units is notable. The building is described as 'well maintained' and 'boutique' with only three units per floor, which may make a chute less likely or at least less of a selling point. Because there are zero explicit references in a relatively large sample of 14 listings, the evidence leans toward the building not having a trash chute.

Across 14 listings for this building, none mention valet, valet service, or valet parking, despite many detailed references to parking and amenities. Multiple listings explicitly describe parking as '1 parking & a flexible den,' '1 covered parking stall,' 'one assigned parking stall,' and note '4 guest parking stalls' and 'multiple guest parking,' but never refer to valet. Amenities are repeatedly listed as heated pool, bike racks, surfboard storage, storage units, resident manager, and secured entry, again with no valet reference. Given how consistently parking details are described, the absence of any valet mention strongly suggests the building does not offer valet service. Therefore, the feature is set to false with high confidence.

Across 14 listings, none mention any perimeter wall or fencing around the property. The remarks repeatedly highlight amenities like a 'heated pool,' 'guest parking,' 'bike racks,' 'secured surfboard room,' and 'covered, secured parking,' but there are no references to being a 'gated' complex, 'walled' grounds, or any kind of boundary fence. Security-related language is limited to interior/building access such as 'Building entry by fobs' and 'secured storage in the parking garage area,' which does not imply an enclosing wall or fence around the property. Given this level of detail about building features, the absence of any mention of a wall or fence suggests the property is not notably enclosed in this way. Therefore, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building does not have a perimeter wall/fence as a defining feature.

Across 14 listings, multiple unit remarks describe the building’s amenities in detail, repeatedly mentioning a 'heated pool,' 'pool,' and 'common area Heated Pool,' but none mention any whirlpool, hot tub, jacuzzi, spa, or similar hydrotherapy feature. For example, one listing notes 'resort-style amenities including a heated pool, extra storage, bike racks,' and another says 'well-kept and secured buildings with heated swimming pool, bike racks and secured surfboard room,' yet no additional water features are listed. Another unit highlights 'Common area Heated Pool' as a key amenity, again without reference to a whirlpool or spa. Given that amenities are a selling point and are consistently enumerated, the absence of any whirlpool-related term across all 14 remarks strongly suggests the building does not have this feature. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

Pool is confirmed across the listings: multiple remarks explicitly mention a "heated swimming pool," "heated pool," "common area Heated Pool," and "pool downstairs." This appears consistently across many agents and listings, matching the historical MLS amenity data (15/15 listings), so confidence is very high.

Multiple listings explicitly state that the building has a heated pool. The first listing notes 'resort-style amenities including a heated pool,' the second mentions a 'secured building with heated swimming pool,' the third says 'Heated pool on property,' and another highlights a 'Common area Heated Pool' in the bullet points. In total, 4 of 14 listings clearly and directly reference a heated pool. No listings contradict this or suggest the pool is unheated. Given these consistent, explicit mentions across several independent remarks, it is highly certain that the building’s pool is heated.

I searched for salt-water pool wording such as 'saltwater pool' or 'saline pool' and found none. The listings consistently mention a heated pool, but not a salt pool.

In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listing set and appears consistent rather than incidental. At least 5 listings explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit, including detailed phrases like "full-size washer and dryer," "new stack washer/dryer in the unit," and "Bosch washer/dryer." This matches the high-confidence historical MLS data and does not look like a copy-paste error.

Across 14 listings, multiple units explicitly mention having in-unit laundry, such as 'full-size washer and dryer,' 'New stack washer/dryer in the unit,' 'Washer and dryer in the unit,' and 'Bosch washer/dryer.' None of the remarks reference a shared or community laundry room, coin laundry, or laundry on each floor. Amenities listed for the building focus on a heated pool, storage, bike and surfboard rooms, guest parking, and pet-friendliness, but never shared laundry facilities. The repeated emphasis on in-unit washers/dryers across several different units suggests that laundry is primarily or exclusively in-unit rather than communal. Because there are no explicit mentions of community laundry and strong evidence of in-unit laundry, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building does not feature shared/community laundry.

I looked for coin laundry, paid laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees and found nothing. The public remarks do not describe any shared laundry setup at all.

I searched for references to community laundry, laundry rooms on each floor, or floor-by-floor laundry, and found none. The remarks do mention in-unit washer/dryer in several listings, but nothing about shared laundry facilities.

Across the 14 listings, at least 10 explicitly mention parking associated with the building or units, indicating that the building provides parking. Examples include: '1 parking & a flexible den,' 'The unit includes 1 covered parking stall,' 'includes an assigned parking stall,' and 'Parking is no issue as you will have your own assigned parking. The building also has multiple guest parking.' Several listings also reference guest parking, such as 'pool and 4 guest parking' and 'One assigned parking plus 4 guest parking stalls,' confirming shared building parking facilities. No listing states that there is no parking, and multiple references to covered, secured, and underground parking further support that parking is a consistent building feature. Given the repeated, explicit mentions across many units, the determination that the building has parking is made with very high confidence.

Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly state 'assigned parking stall,' '1 assigned parking,' and 'own assigned parking,' while the MLS history shows 13/15 listings with ASSIGN in parking features. The consistency across different agents and unit types indicates assigned/reserved parking is a real building feature.

Covered parking is well supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Several listings explicitly mention '1 covered parking stall,' '1 covered, secured parking,' and parking in the garage area, aligning with the prior high-confidence MLS pattern. The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, not just a single pasted remark.

I searched for deeded/owned parking language such as 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in deed.' The remarks consistently describe assigned or covered parking, but never state that the parking is deeded with the unit.

Across 14 listings for this building, none mention electric vehicle charging, EV stations, or any kind of car charging capability, despite frequent and detailed references to parking and amenities. Multiple listings highlight features like '1 parking & a flexible den,' '1 covered parking stall,' '4 guest parking,' 'secured parking,' and 'the best underground parking spot,' but there is no indication of EV infrastructure. Amenities are repeatedly described (heated pool, bike racks, secured surfboard room, storage, pet-friendly, new pipes, new roof, new elevators), suggesting that notable building features are typically called out. The complete silence on EV charging in this context strongly suggests it is not present. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

I looked for parking cost terms like 'parking fee,' 'monthly parking charge,' or 'additional parking cost.' The remarks only say the unit includes or has assigned parking, with no separate parking fee disclosed.

There are multiple explicit mentions of guest parking in the remarks, indicating this is a building-level feature. One listing states, 'The building also has multiple guest parking,' clearly identifying guest parking as an amenity. Another listing notes, 'pool and 4 guest parking,' and a third mentions, 'One assigned parking plus 4 guest parking stalls.' A later listing reinforces this with, 'plenty of guest parking, pool and bike room.' These consistent references across at least four of the 14 listings strongly support that the building provides guest parking. The repetition and specificity of the guest parking descriptions justify a high confidence that this feature is present.

Across 14 listings, several mention parking but none describe secured or controlled entry for the parking area. Phrases include '1 parking & a flexible den,' '1 covered parking stall,' 'Parking is no issue as you will have your own assigned parking,' and 'the best underground parking spot,' yet there is no reference to gates, card/fob access specific to parking, or 'secured' parking. Security is mentioned for other elements: a 'secured surfboard room,' 'secured storage in the parking garage area,' and that the building is 'well-kept and secured' with 'Building entry by fobs,' but these do not explicitly extend to the parking entrance itself. One listing notes '1 covered, secured parking' in two separate units, but this could refer to the stall being in a secure building rather than a gated parking entry, and no other listings corroborate gated or controlled parking access. Given the lack of clear, repeated evidence of gated or card-access parking, the building is inferred not to have a specifically secured parking entry.

Across 14 listings, parking is consistently described only as '1 parking,' '1 covered parking stall,' 'one full size covered parking stall,' 'assigned parking,' or 'secured parking,' with no mention of tandem, back-to-back, or shared stalls. Several listings emphasize the quality or convenience of the stall (e.g., 'the best underground parking spot,' '1 covered, secured parking'), which would be a natural place to note a tandem configuration if it existed. None of the remarks use terms like 'tandem parking,' 'tandem stall,' or similar phrasing. Given this repeated but standard description of single stalls and complete silence on tandem style in all 14 listings, it is more likely that the building uses conventional (non-tandem) parking. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

Across 14 listings for this building, none mention valet parking, valet service, or attended parking, despite frequent and detailed references to parking arrangements. The remarks repeatedly specify '1 parking & a flexible den,' '1 covered parking stall,' '1 covered, secured parking,' 'your own assigned parking,' and note '4 guest parking' and 'multiple guest parking,' but never describe any valet component. Amenities like a heated pool, bike racks, surfboard storage, resident manager, and secured entry are consistently highlighted, suggesting agents are thorough about building features. The complete absence of any valet-related terms in this context strongly indicates that the building does not offer valet parking. Therefore, the feature is set to false with high confidence.

I searched for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' or instructions to join a parking queue. Nothing in the remarks suggests a waitlist system; parking appears to be assigned or included for the units mentioned.

Across 14 listings, none mention keyed or fob-access elevator security, despite multiple references to other security features. One listing notes 'Building entry by fobs' but does not extend this to the elevator itself, implying fob control is for the main entry only. Several listings describe the building as 'well-kept and secured' or mention 'secured storage' and 'secured parking,' yet still omit any reference to a secure or restricted elevator. Elevators are mentioned only in the context of being 'new elevators' or having been 'installed,' with no indication of key or fob access. Given this consistent silence on elevator-specific security while other security features are highlighted, it is more likely the building does not have keyed/fob elevator access.

The remarks directly indicate card/fob access security with 'Building entry by fobs.' That is strong evidence of an electronic access system for the building.

Across 14 listings for this building, none mention a security guard, 24-hour security, or on-site security personnel. Security-related comments focus instead on secured access and storage, such as 'secured surfboard room,' 'secured storage in the parking garage area,' 'building entry by fobs,' and '1 covered, secured parking,' but never reference guards or staffed security. Multiple listings describe the property as a 'well-kept and secured building' and a 'well-maintained building' without elaborating on any manned security presence. Given how frequently amenities like pool, guest parking, resident manager, and pet-friendliness are detailed, the absence of any explicit mention of a security guard strongly suggests this service is not provided. Therefore, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building does not have a security guard service.

I searched for security patrol language, including roving or patrolled security, and found none. The only security-related references are to the building being 'secured' and fob entry.

Across 14 listings for this building, none mention video surveillance, security cameras, CCTV, or any form of video monitoring, despite multiple detailed amenity descriptions. Security-related features that are mentioned include 'well-kept and secured buildings' and 'Building entry by fobs,' as well as '1 covered, secured parking,' but these refer to access control rather than video systems. Several listings list many amenities ('heated pool, extra storage, bike racks, & a secured surfboard room,' 'resident manager,' '4 guest parking stalls') without any reference to cameras. Given how often security features are marketed when present, this consistent silence across all 14 remarks suggests the building likely does not emphasize or possibly does not have video surveillance. Therefore, the most reasonable inference from the available text is that the security_video feature should be set to false.

Across 14 listings, none explicitly mention building-wide or unit-level central air conditioning, HVAC, or forced air; instead, cooling is described only in limited, non-central terms. One listing notes 'Window AC keeps you cool on the days when the breezes aren't enough,' which strongly suggests individual window units rather than a central system. Another listing says 'air conditioning throughout' for a specific renovated unit, but does not specify that this is central or building-provided, and it could be multiple split or window units. No remarks reference common central AC indicators such as 'central air,' 'central AC,' 'HVAC,' or 'fan-coil' despite detailed amenity descriptions (heated pool, new pipes, new roof, elevators, etc.). Given the consistent silence on central AC and the explicit presence of window AC, the evidence points to the building not having a central air conditioning system.

Across 14 listings, there are no explicit mentions of split systems, mini-splits, or ductless AC. Cooling is referenced only generically, such as 'Window AC keeps you cool' and 'air conditioning throughout,' with no indication these are split or ductless systems. Given how often other upgrades and mechanical features are highlighted ('new AC,' 'new pipes,' 'new roof,' etc.), the absence of any mention of split or ductless AC strongly suggests the building uses conventional window or central units instead. Because the corpus is fairly detailed and still lacks any split AC terminology, the most reasonable conclusion is that split AC is not a building feature.

Out of 14 listings, at least 1 explicitly mentions window air conditioning, stating: 'Window AC keeps you cool on the days when the breezes aren't enough.' This is a clear, direct reference to window AC units in the building. Another listing notes 'air conditioning throughout' without specifying type, which is consistent with either central or multiple room units, but does not contradict the presence of window units. No listings mention central AC or split systems as a building-wide feature, and none contradict the existence of window units. Given the explicit window AC reference and lack of opposing evidence, the building is best characterized as having window air conditioning units.

All 15 current listings indicate concrete construction in the MLS material field. None of the public remarks explicitly describe the building as concrete or reinforced concrete, so this appears to be driven by consistent MLS entry rather than remark text. Still, the uniform 15/15 current MLS signal is strong enough to include the feature.

Across 14 listings for this building, none mention double wall or double-wall construction, nor any similar phrasing like 'two walls' or special sound-insulating wall systems. The remarks focus heavily on views, renovations, pet-friendliness, repiping, new elevators, and amenities such as a heated pool, storage, and parking. Given how often agents highlight construction quality when it is a selling point, the complete absence of any reference to double wall construction across all units suggests it is not a notable feature here. Because the corpus is fairly large and consistently silent on this specific attribute, it is more likely the building does not have distinctive double wall construction, leading to a negative determination with relatively high confidence.

Across 14 listings, none mention the building being constructed with hollow tile or use phrases like 'hollow tile construction.' The remarks focus on views, renovations, pet-friendliness, repiping, new roof, new elevators, and amenities such as a heated pool and storage, but are silent on specific structural materials. Given how often other construction details (e.g., 're-piping,' 'new roof,' 'new driveway') are highlighted, the absence of any reference to hollow tile in all 14 listings suggests this is not a notable or marketed feature of the building. Because there are zero explicit mentions out of 14 opportunities, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building is not specifically identified as hollow tile construction in these remarks.

Across 14 listings, none mention the building’s construction as masonry or stucco, nor do they use related terms like 'masonry' or 'stucco' anywhere in the remarks. The descriptions focus on views, renovations, pet-friendliness, amenities, and recent building upgrades such as 'new roof,' 'new pipes,' and 'new elevators,' but remain silent on exterior construction materials. For example, one listing notes the building is 'well-kept and secured' with a 'heated swimming pool' and another highlights it as a 'well-maintained building' with only three units per floor, yet neither references masonry or stucco. Given 0 of 14 listings provide explicit evidence of masonry and stucco construction, the most reasonable conclusion is that this feature should not be marked present. The absence of any mention across multiple detailed listings suggests that if the building had notable masonry and stucco construction, it likely would have been referenced at least once.

Across 14 listings for this building, none of the remarks mention steel frame construction or use phrases like 'steel frame' or 'steel frame construction.' The comments focus on views, renovations, pet-friendliness, repiping, new elevators, roof, and other upgrades, but are silent on the building’s structural system. For example, listings highlight 're-piping has been completed,' 'new roof,' and 'new elevators,' yet never reference steel as a framing material. Given that agents often highlight concrete or steel construction when it is a selling point, this consistent omission across all listings suggests the building is not specifically marketed as steel frame. In the absence of any explicit evidence, the most reasonable conclusion is that the feature should be marked as not present.

Across 14 listings for this building, none explicitly mention a concrete slab or solid concrete foundation, which are the key indicators for the 'construction_slab' feature. The remarks focus on views, renovations, pet-friendliness, amenities (heated pool, bike/surfboard storage), and building upgrades like 're-piping,' 'new roof,' 'new driveway,' and 'new elevators,' but never reference the foundation type. For example, one listing notes the building is 'well maintained' with a 'new roof' and another mentions a 'nice size storage unit in basement,' yet still no mention of slab construction. In many markets, slab foundations are common for mid/high-rise condos, but the task requires relying only on explicit evidence in the remarks. Because there are zero direct or indirect references to a concrete slab foundation in any of the 14 listings, the safest determination based on the provided text is that this feature should be marked as not present, with moderate but not high confidence due to the possibility of omission in marketing remarks.

No analysis available

Across 14 listings, none mention the building’s construction type or use phrases like 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction.' The remarks focus on views, renovations, amenities, pet-friendliness, repiping, new roof, and elevators (e.g., 'new pipes, a new roof, a new driveway, and new elevators'), but are silent on structural materials. In many markets, especially for a mid/high-rise Waikiki condo with elevators and concrete-style amenities, concrete or steel construction is more typical than wood frame. Because there are zero explicit references to wood framing in any of the 14 listings, the best-supported conclusion is that wood frame construction is not a defining feature here. Given the indirect nature of this inference, confidence is moderate rather than high.

Across 14 listings, none explicitly mention that the building is constructed above ground or use phrases like 'above ground construction' or 'above ground materials.' The remarks focus on views, amenities, renovations, pet-friendliness, and parking, with quotes such as 'sweeping views of the Ala Wai canal' and 'well maintained building' but nothing about the structural nature of construction relative to ground level. While the presence of a 'basement' storage unit and 'underground parking' in two listings implies some below-ground components, this does not confirm or deny a specific 'above ground construction' feature as defined. Because there are zero direct mentions out of 14 listings, the safest interpretation is that this feature is not a highlighted or distinguishing characteristic. Therefore, the feature is set to false with moderate-to-low confidence, driven mainly by the complete absence of explicit evidence rather than contrary evidence.

Across 14 listings for this building, none of the remarks mention brick construction, a brick exterior, or any brick-related descriptors. The comments focus on views, renovations, pet-friendliness, amenities like a heated pool and storage, and building upgrades such as new pipes, roof, driveway, and elevators, but are silent on construction materials. Given how often notable materials like brick are highlighted in marketing when present, this consistent omission across all units suggests the building is not characterized as brick construction. Because the evidence is entirely negative (silence rather than explicit contradiction), the determination is that the feature should be set to false, with moderate confidence.

Across 14 listings, none mention 'single wall construction,' 'single wall,' or similar phrases like 'old Hawaiian style single wall' that are typically used to flag this feature in Hawaii. Instead, the remarks emphasize modern upgrades and solid-feeling construction elements such as 're-piping has been completed,' 'new pipes,' 'new roof,' and extensive renovations, which are less common selling points in older single-wall buildings. Multiple listings describe the building as 'well maintained' and 'high-quality,' with no caveats about older or traditional construction methods. Given that single-wall construction is usually explicitly disclosed due to its implications for insulation and financing, the complete absence of such language in all 14 remarks suggests the building is not single-wall. Therefore, the most reasonable conclusion based on the available text is that the building is not constructed with single-wall construction.

I checked for short-term rental language such as STR allowed, NUC, TVU, legal vacation rental, or owner-use restrictions. The remarks contain none of that, and the existing corpus summary indicates STR is not allowed in this building.

I looked for hotel rental pool references like hotel program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or managed-by-hotel language. None were found, and because STR is not allowed, this feature must be false.

I searched for mandatory pool language such as 'must participate,' 'required rental program,' or 'cannot opt out.' There were no such mentions, and since STR is not allowed, mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.

Across all 14 listings in the remarks corpus, none explicitly mention fee simple tenure or use any of the common indicators such as 'fee simple,' 'FS,' 'fee simple interest,' 'owns land,' or 'land included.' The remarks focus on views, renovations, pet-friendliness, parking, storage, building upgrades, and amenities like a heated pool, but are silent on land tenure. In Hawaii listings, fee simple is typically called out clearly when present, especially in Waikiki where leasehold is common, so this absence is meaningful. Since 0 of 14 listings provide any explicit evidence of fee simple and no indirect phrasing suggests land ownership, the safest conclusion is that there is no confirmed fee simple unit in this building based on the provided text. Therefore, the feature is set to false with moderately high confidence, acknowledging that tenure might be specified elsewhere (e.g., in MLS fields) but is not evidenced in these remarks.

Across all 14 listings in the remarks corpus, none mention leasehold-related terms such as 'leasehold,' 'LH,' 'leased land,' 'land lease,' 'lease rent,' or any lease expiry/renewal information. The remarks focus on views, renovations, pet-friendliness, parking, storage, and building upgrades (e.g., 're-piping,' 'new roof,' 'new elevators'), but are silent on land tenure. In Hawaii listings, leasehold status is typically called out explicitly due to its importance, so the absence of any such language in 14 separate descriptions strongly suggests these are all fee simple units. No listing hints at mixed tenure or provides any lease end dates. Based on this consistent silence on leasehold indicators, the building is most likely not offering leasehold units, so the feature is set to false.

I looked for phrases like 'lease expires,' 'ground lease ends,' 'leasehold expiring,' or any 4-digit renewal/expiry year. None were mentioned, so there is no basis to extract a lease expiry year from these remarks.

I searched the public remarks for VA-related language such as 'VA approved,' 'VA financing,' and 'VA loans accepted' and found none. Based on the absence of any such mention across the listings, there is no evidence this building is VA approved.

The remarks directly say the building is "fully insured," which matches the walls-in/full building insurance definition. This is a strong explicit confirmation from the listing text.

Across 14 listings for this same building, none of the remarks mention fire sprinklers, a sprinkler system, or any kind of fire suppression feature, despite many detailed references to other building systems and upgrades. Agents highlight items like 're-piping has been completed,' 'new roof,' 'new elevators,' and amenities such as a 'heated pool,' 'bike racks,' and 'secured surfboard room,' but never reference sprinklers. Safety and building-quality descriptors like 'well maintained building,' 'fully insured,' and 'secured' also appear without any mention of sprinklers. Given how often major building systems are called out, the complete silence on fire sprinklers suggests they are likely not present or not a selling point. Therefore, the most reasonable determination based on the remarks corpus is that the building does not have a fire sprinkler system.

I searched the public remarks for references to FLSE, fire/life safety compliance, passed fire inspections, or fire safety certification. Nothing in the provided remarks confirms that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation, so this remains unverified.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Across 14 listings, views are consistently described as of the Ala Wai Canal, golf course, mountains, city, and Diamond Head, with no explicit mention of ocean views. Examples include 'panoramic views of the Ala Wai Canal, Manoa Mountains, golf course greens,' 'beautiful mountains and Ala Wai Canal views,' and 'mountain, water, golf course view' where the water clearly refers to the canal. One listing notes 'overlooking the luscious mountain, city, canal, golf course, diamond head and some ocean,' but this is a single, weak reference and not framed as a primary or consistent feature. Multiple listings emphasize the same non-ocean view set (canal, golf course, mountains) and none use phrases like 'ocean view' or 'Pacific Ocean view.' Given the strong pattern and only one ambiguous 'some ocean' mention out of 14, the building is best characterized as not having notable ocean views.

Mountain views are consistently described across many listings, with phrases like "beautiful mountains," "Manoa Mountains," and "stunning unobstructed views of the Koolau mountains." The repetition across multiple remarks suggests this is a real building-level feature rather than isolated agent copy-paste.

Out of 14 listings, 3 explicitly mention Diamond Head views, indicating that the building offers this view from at least some units. One listing notes 'a peek of Diamond Head,' another states 'Beautiful mountain, city, canal, golf course and Diamond Head view!', and a third describes 'overlooking the luscious mountain, city, canal, golf course, diamond head and some ocean.' These are clear, direct references to Diamond Head visibility from the building. No listing states that Diamond Head views are absent, and several emphasize broad panoramic vistas that are consistent with such a view. Given multiple explicit mentions across different units and stacks, it is highly likely that the building has Diamond Head views.

Multiple listings explicitly reference city views, indicating that the building offers city vistas from at least some units. One listing notes 'stunning views of the Ala Wai Canal, golf course, cityscape, and mountains,' directly using the term 'cityscape.' Another emphasizes 'Beautiful mountain, city, canal, golf course and Diamond Head view!' and a top-floor unit describes 'overlooking the luscious mountain, city, canal, golf course, diamond head and some ocean.' Out of 14 listings, at least 3 clearly mention city or cityscape views, and several others describe broad panoramic or sweeping views that include urban elements. No listing states that views are limited to non-city aspects or that there is no view. This consistent pattern supports that the building has city views as a feature.

Across 14 listings, views are consistently described as of the Ala Wai Canal, golf course, mountains, city, Diamond Head, and occasionally 'some ocean,' but never as coastline, shoreline, or coastal views. Examples include: 'panoramic views of the Ala Wai Canal, Manoa Mountains, golf course greens,' 'stunning views of the Ala Wai Canal, golf course, cityscape, and mountains,' and 'overlooking the luscious mountain, city, canal, golf course, diamond head and some ocean.' The one mention of 'some ocean' is not framed as a coastline or shoreline panorama and appears secondary to other view types. No listing uses phrases like 'coastline view,' 'shoreline view,' or 'coastal view,' despite multiple detailed view descriptions. Given the repeated emphasis on non-coastline views and the absence of explicit coastline language, the building is unlikely to have true coastline views.

Garden views are not supported by the current public remarks. The consistent view language across listings centers on canal and mountain vistas, making the single garden-related MLS mention look likely like a checkbox/copy-paste outlier.

Multiple listings explicitly mention golf course views, indicating this is a consistent building-level feature. For example, the first listing notes 'panoramic views of the Ala Wai Canal, Manoa Mountains, golf course greens,' and another describes 'stunning views of the Ala Wai Canal, golf course, cityscape, and mountains.' Additional listings state 'breathtaking mountain, water and golf course views' and 'Enjoy mountain, city, canal, and golf course view!' as well as 'sweeping views of the Ala Wai canal, Golf Course, mountains' in at least two separate units. In total, at least 6 of 14 listings clearly reference golf course or golf course greens views. No listing states that the view is 'NONE' or contradicts the presence of golf course views, so the evidence strongly supports that the building has golf course views.

While the listings do not say "marina" specifically, they consistently mention Ala Wai Canal views, which your definition includes for view_marina. This appears across multiple listings and agents, indicating a stable building-level view offering.

There is no explicit sunrise evidence in the remarks, despite a minority of MLS view descriptions using SUNRIS. The stronger, repeated evidence across the listings is for mountain and canal views, so sunrise appears unverified from the remarks provided.

Out of 14 listings, 1 explicitly mentions enjoying the view at sunset: the first listing describes the lanai as “the perfect spot to start your mornings or unwind at sunset,” indicating that at least some units have a sunset experience from within the building. Multiple listings emphasize broad, sweeping views of the Ala Wai Canal, golf course, city, mountains, Diamond Head, and even “some ocean,” suggesting wide exposures that plausibly include western or evening light. None of the listings state that views are limited to an orientation that would exclude sunsets, and none list the view as “NONE.” While only one listing directly references sunset, it is a clear, positive indication that sunset views are a selling point for at least part of the building. Given this explicit mention plus the repeated emphasis on expansive views, it is reasonable to conclude the building offers sunset views.

Across 14 listings, views are repeatedly described as of the Ala Wai Canal, mountains, golf course, city, Diamond Head, water, and some ocean, with phrases like 'panoramic views of the Ala Wai Canal, Manoa Mountains, golf course greens' and 'Beautiful mountain, city, canal, golf course and Diamond Head view!'. None of the remarks mention a cemetery or cemetery views even once. Given how extensively the view is marketed (many listings emphasize it with language such as 'WOW! VIEW! VIEW! VIEW!' and 'sweeping views'), a cemetery view would likely be noted if present. The consistent absence of any cemetery reference across all units strongly suggests the building does not have notable cemetery views. Therefore, view_cemetery is set to false with high confidence.

I searched for explicit fireworks-view language such as 'see fireworks from the lanai' or 'fireworks view from unit' and found none. The listings focus on canal, mountain, golf course, and occasional Diamond Head views instead.

Geographic designation determined by building address. This is not derived from MLS listing data.

Out of 14 listings, at least 7 explicitly describe the building as pet-friendly or pet-allowed. Examples include: 'This pet-friendly building welcomes furry companions,' 'The pet-friendly building is ideally located,' 'The building is pet-friendly, fully insured,' 'This Building is Pet friendly,' and 'The 2233 Ala Wai is a pet-friendly building.' Another listing notes 'Pet friendly (please confirm)!' reinforcing that pets are generally allowed. No listing states 'no pets' or otherwise prohibits pets. With multiple explicit, consistent mentions and no contradictory remarks, the building clearly allows pets.

Out of 14 listings, at least 2 explicitly mention a resident manager, which is strong evidence this is a building-level feature. One listing describes a 'well maintained building with resident manager,' clearly indicating an on-site manager presence. Another listing separately notes 'Resident Manager' among the building’s features, reinforcing that this is not unit-specific but applies to the entire property. No listings contradict or suggest the absence of a resident or on-site manager. Given multiple explicit references and no opposing evidence, it is highly likely the building has a resident manager.

Across all 14 listings, none mention any hotel-type operations or programs. There are no references to a 'hotel front desk,' 'hotel rental pool,' 'hotel program,' 'managed by hotel,' or the terms 'condotel' or 'condo-hotel.' Instead, the remarks consistently describe it as a residential, pet-friendly building with features like 'only three units per floor,' 'resident manager,' and 'well maintained building,' which are typical of standard condos, not condotels. Several listings emphasize use as a home or second home (e.g., 'meticulously maintained and very lightly used as a second home'), not short-term hotel-style rentals. Given the complete absence of explicit hotel-operation language in 14 separate descriptions, the building is very likely not operating as a condotel.

No specific verification method available for coop. The declared value is retained as provided. Manual review recommended.