222 Kaiulani Apartments

14 of 15 listings report year built as 1960, matching the declared value. This is a well-established data point from MLS records.

I searched the public remarks for explicit owner-occupancy statements (percentages or qualitative indicators) and found none. Because there is no current numeric value and no explicit remarks, the owner-occupancy percentage cannot be determined from the provided remarks.

Public remarks repeatedly reference an elevator (e.g., 'a secure lobby and elevator', 'keyed elevator access', 'Fab elevator'), confirming the building has elevator service. No remarks provide a numeric count (e.g., '4 elevators'), and there is no prior numeric value to retain, so the exact number cannot be determined from the remarks.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Across 15 listings for this building, none mention central air conditioning being included in the maintenance or HOA fees. Where fees are described, they specify items like 'Hot water included in maintenance fee' and 'Maintenance includes water & sewer' but never reference AC or air conditioning. Several listings instead emphasize natural ventilation and breezes, e.g., 'located on the cool side of the building, offering refreshing breezes' and 'cool trade winds,' which often appears when there is no central AC. The repeated omission of any reference to AC in the fee inclusions, despite multiple detailed mentions of what is covered, suggests that central air is not included. Given this consistent pattern and lack of any explicit contrary statement, the most likely conclusion is that maintenance fees do not include central air conditioning.

MLS association checkboxes list CABTV in 11 of 16 current listings, but public remarks across the provided listings contain no mention of cable or 'cable service included.' Evidence for cable being included is limited to MLS checkbox data and lacks corroborating agent remarks, so inclusion is possible but uncertain.

MLS data indicates OTCOEX (common area electric) in 13 of 16 current listings, however none of the public remarks explicitly state 'common area electricity' or similar. The MLS checkbox suggests the charge may be included, but public-remarks evidence is absent, so confidence is low–moderate.

Across 15 listings in this building, none mention cooperative or co-op taxes being included in the maintenance fees. Several listings explicitly describe what the maintenance covers, e.g., 'Hot water included in maintenance fee' and 'Maintenance includes water & sewer,' but there is no reference to any form of co-op or cooperative tax. The units are consistently described as 'condo' or 'Fee Simple' (e.g., 'Lowest priced Fee Simple 3bd/2ba condo in Waikiki'), which further suggests this is not a cooperative structure where co-op taxes would typically be relevant. The complete absence of any phrase like 'coop taxes included,' 'co-op tax,' or similar across all remarks strongly indicates that maintenance fees do not include cooperative taxes. Based on this, the feature is best set to false with relatively high confidence.

Out of 15 listings, 2 explicitly describe what the maintenance fee includes, both stating 'Hot water included in maintenance fee' and 'Maintenance includes water & sewer,' with no mention of electricity. No listing anywhere in the corpus says that electricity, power, or electric service is included in the HOA or maintenance fees. Given that agents repeatedly highlight included utilities (hot water, water, sewer) but never mention electricity, it is likely that electricity is not part of the included fees. The remaining listings are silent on utilities, which further suggests that electricity is not a standard included feature. Because there are clear, repeated descriptions of what is included and electricity is absent from those lists, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

Across 15 listings for this building, none explicitly state that gas is included in the maintenance or HOA fees. Two listings instead specify other inclusions: one notes 'Hot water included in maintenance fee' and that 'Maintenance includes water & sewer,' and another repeats 'Hot water included in maintenance fee' and 'Maintenance includes water & sewer,' but neither mentions gas. The remaining listings are silent on utilities or fee inclusions. Given that agents repeatedly highlight included items yet never reference gas, it is likely that gas is not part of the maintenance fee. The consistent omission of gas across multiple detailed remarks supports setting this feature to false with relatively high confidence.

Several listings explicitly state 'Hot water included in maintenance fee' (phrase appears in multiple unit remarks), and historical MLS data lists HOTWAT in 9/16 current listings. This consistent, repeated explicit language across listings provides strong evidence that hot water is included in the maintenance fee.

MLS association fields indicate internet service (INTSER) in several listings (9/16), but public remarks do not mention 'internet included' or 'Wi‑Fi included.' The evidence is limited to MLS checkbox data without corroborating remarks, so inclusion is possible but uncertain.

Across all 15 listings, none mention marina access, boat slips, or any marina-related fees being included in the maintenance charges. Where maintenance inclusions are specified, they only reference utilities such as 'Hot water included in maintenance fee' and 'Maintenance includes water & sewer,' with no reference to marina benefits. Several listings discuss proximity to beaches, Ala Wai Canal, and Waikiki attractions, but this is about location, not included marina access or fees. The repeated silence on marina inclusion, even in more detailed descriptions of building amenities and HOA coverage, strongly suggests that marina access is not part of the maintenance fees. Therefore, the feature fee_inc_marina should be set to false with high confidence.

At least two separate unit remarks explicitly state 'Maintenance includes water & sewer' and MLS association fields show SEWER in 14 of 16 listings. The repeated explicit mentions across multiple listings provide strong, consistent evidence that sewer is included in the maintenance fee.

Multiple listings explicitly state 'Maintenance includes water' (and 'water & sewer'), and MLS checkboxes list WATER in 14 of 16 current listings. The clear, repeated wording in agent remarks across listings gives strong evidence that water is included in the maintenance fee.

Across 15 listings for units in this building, none mention any BBQ, barbecue, grill, or outdoor grilling facilities, even in the more detailed descriptions of amenities and building features. The remarks repeatedly highlight other aspects such as proximity to Waikiki Beach, secure lobby and elevator, community laundry on every floor, resident manager, and parking options, but are completely silent on BBQ areas. For example, one listing notes a 'secure lobby and elevator' and another mentions 'Convenient community laundry in every floor' without adding BBQ among the shared amenities. In buildings where BBQ facilities exist, they are typically promoted as a selling point, especially in a resort-area market like Waikiki. The consistent omission of any grilling-related feature across all 15 listings strongly suggests the building does not offer BBQ facilities.

Across the 15 listings, none mention any form of bicycle storage, bike room, bike racks, or combined bike/surfboard storage, despite detailed descriptions of other building amenities such as 'secure lobby and elevator,' 'community laundry in every floor,' 'residence manager,' and security cameras. Several listings go into depth on parking options, including rented parking in neighboring buildings and deeded stalls, but still make no reference to bike storage. Given how often Waikiki listings highlight bike/surfboard storage when present, this consistent silence across all units suggests the building likely does not offer dedicated bicycle storage. Because the corpus is fairly large (15 listings) and consistently omits this feature while mentioning many others, the evidence leans strongly toward absence rather than mere omission.

Across all 15 listings, none mention any boat-related amenities such as a 'boat dock,' 'marina,' 'boat slip,' 'mooring,' or 'yacht' access, despite extensive descriptions of location and features. The remarks repeatedly highlight proximity to Waikiki Beach and Ala Wai Canal (e.g., 'just minutes away from Waikiki Beach,' 'park free along Ala Wai Canal'), but only in the context of beach access, street/canal parking, and general recreation. Several listings go into detail about building amenities like secure lobby, elevator, community laundry, and parking arrangements, yet still omit any reference to dock or marina facilities. Given how prominently a boat dock or marina would typically be marketed if present, this consistent silence strongly suggests the building does not offer boat dock or marina access. Therefore, the feature is set to false with high confidence.

Across all 15 listings in the remarks corpus, none mention any form of car wash facility, auto wash, vehicle wash area, or car wash station. The remarks frequently highlight other building and area amenities such as 'community laundry in every floor,' 'secure lobby and elevator,' and proximity to Waikiki Beach, shopping, and dining, but remain completely silent on car-related amenities beyond parking availability. Several listings go into detail about parking options (e.g., 'Parking stall is $360 a month,' 'Parking may be available for rent in neighboring buildings,' 'Apartment comes with 1 deeded parking stall'), which makes the absence of any car wash mention more notable. Given this consistent omission across multiple detailed descriptions, it is reasonable to conclude that the building does not offer a car wash facility.

Across all 15 listings in the remarks corpus, none mention a clubhouse, club house, community center, or recreation center as a building amenity. The remarks focus on features like proximity to Waikiki Beach and shopping, unit renovations, lanais, parking (often in neighboring buildings), security features ('secure lobby and elevator', 'Secured Building with security camera'), and community laundry on each floor. Given how frequently amenities are described, the absence of any reference to a clubhouse or similar shared recreational facility strongly suggests the building does not offer this feature. Because there are zero explicit or even indirect mentions of a clubhouse in 15 separate descriptions, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building lacks a clubhouse/community center.

Across 15 listings for 222 Kaiulani, none explicitly mention a concierge, concierge service, or staffed front desk. Security-related features are described instead, such as a 'secure lobby and elevator' and a 'Secured Building with security camera. Fab elevator and a residence manager,' but these refer to building access control and an on-site manager, not a dedicated concierge service. Other listings emphasize location, parking, renovations, and security FOB entry, yet remain silent on any front desk or concierge amenity. Given that multiple detailed descriptions of building features omit any concierge reference, it is likely that this building does not offer concierge service.

Across all 15 listings, none mention a dog park, dog run, pet area, or any dedicated dog exercise space within the building or its grounds. The remarks focus heavily on proximity to Waikiki Beach, shopping, dining, security, laundry, parking options, and interior upgrades, but are silent on pet-specific amenities. One listing notes the building is 'pet friendly,' but does not reference any on-site dog park or pet area. Given that such a feature is typically highlighted as a selling point when present, its complete absence from all descriptions strongly suggests the building does not have a dog park. Therefore, the feature is set to false with high confidence.

Across 15 listings for 222 Kaiulani, none mention a doorman, door attendant, or lobby attendant, which is notable given how frequently Waikiki listings highlight that amenity when present. Security features described include a 'secure lobby and elevator' in one listing and a 'Secured Building with security camera. Fab elevator and a residence manager' in another, but there is no reference to staffed door service. One listing also notes 'secure building with FOB entry, and keyed elevator access,' again emphasizing electronic/physical security rather than personnel. The repeated focus on FOB/keyed access, cameras, and a resident manager instead of a doorman suggests the building relies on these systems rather than a lobby attendant. Because multiple detailed descriptions of building features omit any doorman reference, it is likely that this building does not have a doorman.

Across 15 listings for units in this building, none mention an exercise room, gym, fitness center, or similar facility, despite many detailed descriptions of both unit and building amenities. The remarks repeatedly highlight features like 'community laundry in every floor,' 'secured building with security camera,' 'FOB entry, and keyed elevator access,' and proximity to beaches, shopping, and dining, but never reference any workout or fitness space. Given how commonly agents market gyms when present, this consistent omission across all listings strongly suggests the building does not have an exercise room. Because the sample covers multiple units, including penthouses and remodeled units, and still no gym is mentioned, the likelihood that such a feature exists but is unmentioned is low. Therefore, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building lacks an exercise room.

Across all 15 listings in the remarks corpus, none mention any form of limousine or car service, such as a 'limo service,' 'house car,' 'courtesy car,' 'complimentary car service,' or 'chauffeur.' The amenities and features repeatedly highlighted are proximity to Waikiki Beach, shopping and dining, parking availability or lack thereof (e.g., 'Parking stall is $360 a month,' 'Parking may be available for rent in neighboring buildings,' 'Unit does not come with parking'), security, laundry, and interior upgrades. In luxury buildings that offer limo or house car service, this is typically a prominently advertised perk, but here it is never referenced even once. The consistent focus on basic parking challenges rather than any enhanced transportation amenity further suggests the building does not provide a dedicated car or limo service. Given the complete absence of explicit or implicit references across 15 separate listings, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building does not offer limousine or car service.

Across all 15 listings in the remarks corpus, none mention a meeting room, conference room, board room, hospitality room, or community room. The amenities that are repeatedly highlighted include 'community laundry in every floor,' 'secure lobby and elevator,' 'security camera,' and proximity to beaches, shopping, and dining, but there is no reference to any shared meeting or conference-type space. For example, one listing notes a 'secure building with FOB entry, and keyed elevator access' and another mentions a 'residence manager,' yet neither expands into any meeting or community room facilities. Given that multiple listings describe building features in some detail without ever mentioning such a room, it is reasonable to infer that the building likely does not offer a dedicated meeting or conference room. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

Multiple listings explicitly reference outdoor lanai spaces, indicating a building-level feature of patios/decks. At least 6 of 15 listings mention a lanai, including phrases like 'private lanai,' 'large lanai for seamless indoor-outdoor living,' 'this condo has a lanai you will never want to leave,' and 'large 144 SF covered lanai.' Another listing notes 'spacious lanais overlooking the city,' reinforcing that these are structural outdoor spaces, not incidental. The repetition of lanai descriptions across different units and penthouses shows this is a common amenity of the building rather than a one-off modification. Because lanai is the local term for an outdoor patio/deck space, this strongly supports setting the patio_deck feature to true.

Across 15 listings, none mention any jogging or walking path as a building amenity, despite extensive descriptions of both unit features and location. The remarks repeatedly highlight proximity to Waikiki Beach, Kapiolani Park, Ala Wai Canal, shopping, dining, and entertainment (e.g., 'just minutes away from Waikiki Beach, shopping, the zoo' and 'Situated near the Ala Wai Canal and just a short walk from the world-famous Waikiki Beach'), but never reference a dedicated jogging path, running trail, or fitness path on the property. Given how often outdoor and lifestyle amenities are emphasized, the absence of any such mention strongly suggests the building does not offer a specific jogging or walking path. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

Across all 15 listings in the remarks corpus, none mention a playground, children's play area, kids play area, tot lot, or any similar amenity. The remarks repeatedly highlight other features such as proximity to Waikiki Beach, shopping, dining, secure lobby, elevator, community laundry, and parking options, but are entirely silent on any children's play facilities. For example, listings emphasize being 'just minutes away from Waikiki Beach, shopping, the zoo' and a 'secure building with FOB entry,' yet never reference a playground. In family-oriented or amenity-rich condo buildings, a playground is typically marketed explicitly. The complete absence of such mentions across many units in the same building strongly suggests that the building does not have a children's playground.

Across 15 listings in this Waikiki condo building, none mention a 'private yard,' 'fenced yard,' 'enclosed yard,' or similar language suggesting any kind of yard space. Outdoor space is consistently described as 'lanai,' 'large lanai,' 'expansive lanai,' or 'spacious lanais,' which are balcony-style features typical of high-rise or mid-rise condos, not ground-level yard areas. For example, remarks highlight a 'large 144 SF covered lanai' and 'a lanai you will never want to leave,' but never reference any yard or private ground-level outdoor area. The building is clearly an urban Waikiki condo with emphasis on proximity to the beach, shopping, and city views rather than yard space. Given the complete absence of yard-related terms in all 15 listings, it is very likely that the building does not offer private yard space.

Across all 15 listings in the remarks corpus for 222 Kaiulani, none mention a putting green, golf putting green, or practice putting green. The remarks repeatedly highlight other building and area features such as proximity to Waikiki Beach, shopping and dining, secure lobby and elevator, community laundry on every floor, parking options, lanais, and in-unit or shared laundry (e.g., 'Convenient community laundry in every floor,' 'This pet friendly condo provides a secure lobby and elevator'). Amenities like a putting green are typically marketed prominently if present, especially in a competitive resort/condo market like Waikiki. The complete absence of any golf- or putting-related amenity language across 15 separate listings strongly suggests the building does not offer a putting green. Therefore, the feature is set to false with high confidence.

Across all 15 listings, none mention a recreation area, rec area, recreation deck, amenity deck, or any similar shared recreation space. The remarks focus on unit interiors, proximity to Waikiki Beach, shopping, dining, and building basics like 'community laundry in every floor,' 'secure lobby and elevator,' and security cameras, but no shared recreation amenities. Even more detailed penthouse and remodeled-unit descriptions omit any reference to a recreation or amenity deck despite highlighting other selling points. Given this consistent silence across many listings, it is likely the building does not offer a dedicated recreation area. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

Across all 15 listings in the remarks corpus, none mention a recreation room, rec room, game room, entertainment room, or multi-purpose room as a building amenity. The remarks focus on unit interiors, proximity to Waikiki Beach and shopping, parking arrangements, security, laundry on every floor, and features like 'secure lobby and elevator' and a 'residence manager,' but there are no references to shared recreational or game spaces. Given how frequently other building amenities are highlighted (e.g., community laundry, security camera, FOB entry), the absence of any mention of a recreation or game room in 15 separate listings strongly suggests the building does not offer this feature. Therefore, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building does not have a recreation room.

Across 15 listings, none mention an on-site or in-building restaurant, café, or dining facility specific to the condo building. All dining references are to the surrounding Waikiki area, such as being near 'world-renowned dining' and 'a variety of restaurants, shops and nightlife' or 'famous restaurants and shops,' which clearly describe neighborhood amenities rather than building features. Several listings go into detail on building-related amenities like 'Laundry room on every floor,' 'secure lobby and elevator,' 'community laundry,' and parking arrangements, yet still omit any restaurant or dining facility. This consistent silence about an in-building restaurant, despite extensive mention of nearby eateries, strongly suggests the building does not have its own restaurant. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

Across 15 listings for units in this building, none mention any rooftop-related amenities or access, despite detailed descriptions of many other features. The remarks repeatedly highlight elements like 'large lanai,' 'panoramic views of the cityscape,' and proximity to Waikiki Beach, but there is no reference to a 'rooftop,' 'roof deck,' 'rooftop terrace,' or similar terms. Several penthouse listings (e.g., 'Penthouse #3' and 'Penthouse #4') describe views, lanais, and interior upgrades, yet still omit any rooftop amenity, which would typically be a strong selling point if present. The building amenities that are mentioned include community laundry, secure lobby, elevator, and parking options, again with no rooftop reference. Given the consistent silence on rooftop features across all units, it is likely the building does not offer rooftop amenities or access.

Across all 15 listings in the remarks corpus for 222 Kaiulani, none mention a sauna, steam room, dry sauna, or wet sauna. The amenities and building features that are highlighted include items like 'Laundry room on every floor,' 'community laundry in every floor,' 'secure lobby and elevator,' FOB/keyed access, and proximity to Waikiki Beach, shopping, and dining, but there is no reference to wellness or spa facilities. In a building where agents repeatedly emphasize selling points, a sauna would typically be mentioned if present, especially in a competitive Waikiki market. The complete silence on any sauna-related feature in all 15 listings strongly suggests that the building does not have a sauna. Therefore, the most reasonable conclusion is that this feature is absent in the building.

Across 15 listings in this building, none mention any form of building-provided storage units or lockers. The only uses of the word 'storage' are clearly in-unit, such as 'nice cabinetry to meet all your storage needs' and 'New kitchen with a ton of storage space,' which refer to cabinet/closet capacity, not separate storage lockers. Several listings list amenities like secure lobby, elevator, resident manager, community laundry, and parking arrangements, but there is no reference to 'extra storage,' 'storage locker,' or 'storage unit' anywhere. Given how consistently other amenities are described, the complete absence of storage mentions strongly suggests the building does not offer dedicated storage units. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

I searched the remarks for terms related to surfboard or board storage and found no references. Despite emphasis on beach proximity, there is no explicit storage amenity mentioned, so surfboard_storage is false with medium confidence.

Across all 15 listings in the remarks corpus, none mention any tennis-related amenities such as a 'tennis court,' 'tennis facilities,' or similar phrases. The remarks frequently highlight other features—proximity to Waikiki Beach, shopping, dining, secure lobby, elevator, community laundry, parking options, and lanais—but remain completely silent on tennis facilities. For a building-level amenity like a tennis court, it would typically be a strong marketing point and appear in at least some unit descriptions if it existed. The consistent omission across multiple penthouse and standard units suggests that the building does not offer tennis courts. Therefore, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building lacks tennis court facilities.

Across 15 listings in this building, none mention a trash chute, garbage chute, or refuse chute, despite many detailed descriptions of building amenities and services. Several listings highlight other shared features like 'Laundry room on every floor' and 'Convenient community laundry in every floor,' as well as security features like 'secure lobby and elevator' and 'Secured Building with security camera,' but still no reference to any chute system. In condo marketing, trash chutes are typically called out explicitly when present, especially in high-rise urban buildings. The repeated emphasis on other conveniences without any mention of a chute suggests it is likely absent. Given the size of the sample (15 listings) and the level of detail, the evidence points toward the building not having a trash chute system.

Across all 15 listings in the remarks corpus, there are zero mentions of 'valet,' 'valet service,' or 'valet parking.' Parking is repeatedly discussed in other terms, such as 'parking stall,' 'assigned parking space,' and 'Parking is available for rent on a monthly basis in the building next door,' with no indication of any staffed or valet component. Several listings emphasize that parking must be rented in neighboring buildings or that units come without parking, which would be unusual if a building-wide valet service existed. The remarks also highlight other building features like secure lobby, keyed elevator, community laundry, and resident manager, but never reference valet despite multiple opportunities to do so. Given the consistent silence on valet across 15 separate descriptions that focus heavily on parking logistics, it is very likely that the building does not offer valet service.

Across all 15 listings, none mention any perimeter wall or fencing, nor terms like 'gated,' 'walled,' 'fenced,' or 'enclosed property.' Security-related comments are limited to interior access features such as a 'secure lobby and elevator' and 'secure building with FOB entry, and keyed elevator access,' which indicate controlled building entry but not a surrounding wall or fence around the property. Multiple listings emphasize the open, central Waikiki location 'in the heart of it all' and being 'just steps' from beaches, shops, and restaurants, suggesting an urban, street-integrated building rather than a gated or fenced compound. Given the complete absence of explicit perimeter descriptions across 15 separate remarks, it is more likely that the property does not have a notable enclosing wall or fence, or at least not one marketed as a feature.

Across all 15 listings in the remarks corpus, none mention any building amenities related to a whirlpool, hot tub, jacuzzi, spa, or hydrotherapy. The remarks focus on interior upgrades, parking, proximity to Waikiki Beach, and basic building features like 'Laundry room on every floor,' 'Convenient community laundry,' and a 'secure lobby and elevator,' but there are no references to recreational water amenities. Given how prominently such features are typically advertised when present, their complete absence across multiple penthouse and standard unit listings strongly suggests the building does not have a whirlpool or similar facility. Therefore, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building lacks this feature.

Across all 15 listings in the remarks corpus, none mention a pool or any related amenity such as a 'swimming pool,' 'lap pool,' or 'heated pool.' The remarks repeatedly highlight other building and area features—e.g., 'Laundry room on every floor,' 'Secured Building with security camera,' 'secure lobby and elevator,' proximity to 'Waikiki Beach,' and parking options—but are entirely silent about a pool. In Waikiki, where a pool would be a strong selling point, its omission from every listing is notable. The consistent focus on beach access instead of on-site water amenities further suggests the building does not have a pool. Given the complete absence of explicit or implicit references to a pool in 15 separate descriptions, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building lacks this feature.

Across 15 listings for units in this building, none mention a heated pool or any pool at all, despite detailed descriptions of many other amenities and features. The remarks repeatedly highlight proximity to Waikiki Beach and lifestyle benefits (e.g., 'Just steps away from Waikiki Beach,' '2 blocks from world famous Waikiki Beach'), as well as building features like secure lobby, elevator, community laundry, resident manager, and parking arrangements. In a resort-oriented market like Waikiki, a heated pool is typically a prominently advertised amenity, yet there are zero references to 'heated pool,' 'heated swimming pool,' or similar phrases. This consistent silence across all 15 listings strongly suggests the building does not offer a heated pool. Therefore, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building does not have a heated swimming pool.

Given the building context explicitly lists no pool and no remarks mention a pool or a saltwater system, pool_salt is set to false with high confidence.

Multiple current listings (at least 5 distinct public-remarks entries) explicitly mention in-unit laundry: phrases include 'in unit washer and dryer', 'in-unit washer and dryer', 'washer/driver combo unit', and 'washer/dryer combo in-suite'. Other listings note building laundry rooms on every floor, indicating a mix of units with in-unit laundry and shared laundry; evidence is strong across multiple agents and consistent with prior high-confidence historical data.

Multiple listings explicitly describe shared laundry facilities in the building. At least three separate remarks state there is a 'Laundry room on every floor' or 'Convenient community laundry in every floor,' clearly indicating building-level, shared laundry rather than only in-unit machines. While a few units mention in-unit washer/dryer combos, these appear as special features of those particular units and do not contradict the presence of community laundry. Out of 15 listings, 3 explicitly reference community/shared laundry, and none state that the building lacks such facilities. This consistent, explicit language strongly supports that the building has community laundry.

I searched for terms like 'coin laundry', 'paid laundry', 'card operated', 'quarters', and 'coin-op' but found no references. Because the remarks do not indicate payment is required, this is set to false with medium confidence.

Multiple listings explicitly mention laundry facilities on every floor ('Laundry room on every floor', 'Convenient community laundry in every floor'), so this feature is present with high confidence.

Multiple listings and remarks confirm the building offers parking: 6 of 16 current MLS entries have parking_features set and the public remarks repeatedly state 'parking stall', 'reserved at the building', 'assigned parking space', and 'deeded parking stall'. Several other listings note 'unit does not come with parking' or that parking may be rented in neighboring buildings, indicating parking exists but is not included with every unit.

Out of 15 listings, multiple explicitly reference assigned or deeded parking, indicating that the building supports reserved parking arrangements. One listing notes an 'assigned parking space, which is a coveted commodity in the heart of Waikiki,' clearly showing designated parking for at least some units. Another states the apartment 'comes with 1 deeded parking stall,' which is a strong indicator of reserved/assigned parking rights. Additional listings mention a 'parking stall' or 'covered parking stall' with the unit, suggesting specific stalls rather than unassigned general parking. While several listings state 'unit does not come with parking' or reference renting parking in neighboring buildings, this points to limited availability rather than the absence of assigned parking in the building. Overall, the explicit mentions of assigned and deeded stalls support a true value for building-level assigned parking, though not all units have it.

Out of 15 listings, several explicitly discuss parking details, allowing a clear view of the building’s parking situation. One listing states 'PARKING STALL - RESERVED AT THE BUILDING right next door' and another notes 'Parking is available for rent on a monthly basis in the building next door,' indicating that some units rely on an adjacent building for parking. However, at least two listings clearly describe on-site covered parking: one says 'Enjoy the luxury of a covered parking stall, a rare find in this vibrant neighborhood,' and another mentions the unit 'comes with 1 deeded parking stall' without suggesting it is off-site. The explicit phrase 'covered parking stall' strongly indicates that the building itself offers covered parking, not just open stalls. While some units have no parking or use neighboring buildings, the direct mention of a covered stall tied to this condo supports setting the feature to true with relatively high confidence.

Some units in the building are conveyed with deeded parking stalls as indicated in the remarks. I searched for 'deeded parking', 'owned parking', and similar language and found explicit mention for at least one unit.

Across 15 listings in this Waikiki condo building, none mention electric vehicle amenities such as 'EV charging,' 'charging stations,' or similar terms. Parking is discussed frequently (e.g., 'parking stall,' 'assigned parking space,' and 'Parking is available for rent on a monthly basis in the building next door'), indicating that agents are attentive to parking-related features. Despite this, there are zero references to EV-specific infrastructure, which would typically be highlighted as a selling point if present. Several listings even reference renting parking in neighboring buildings or note that units do not come with parking, but still no EV mention appears. Given the repeated, detailed parking descriptions without any EV reference, it is likely the building does not have EV charging stations.

The public remarks include a specific monthly parking charge of $360 for a parking stall. Other mentions indicate parking rental availability, but $360/month is the explicit fee provided.

Across 15 listings for this building, none mention any form of guest or visitor parking. Parking is repeatedly described as scarce or off-site, with remarks such as 'PARKING STALL - RESERVED AT THE BUILDING right next door. Seller will pay for 6 months' and 'Monthly parking rental possibility at the Waikiki Banyan, subject to availability,' indicating reliance on neighboring buildings for parking. Several units explicitly state 'Unit does not come with parking' or note that 'Parking is available for rent on a monthly basis in the building next door,' reinforcing that on-site parking is limited and individually arranged. There are no references to 'guest parking' or 'visitor parking' anywhere in the corpus. Given the consistent emphasis on limited, off-site, or deeded parking and total silence about guest options, it is very likely that the building does not offer dedicated guest parking.

Across 15 listings, parking is mentioned multiple times but never described as secured, gated, or controlled by card/fob access. Several listings note parking arrangements such as a 'parking stall' or 'assigned parking space,' and others reference parking rented in neighboring buildings or that the 'Unit does not come with parking,' yet none say 'secured parking,' 'gated parking,' or similar. Security features are described only for the building entry (e.g., 'This pet friendly condo provides a secure lobby and elevator' and 'This is a secure building with FOB entry, and keyed elevator access'), not for the parking area. One listing mentions '1 deeded parking stall' but gives no indication of a secured entry system. Because there are explicit security details for the building but consistent silence about any security for parking, the most reasonable conclusion is that secured parking entry is not a building feature.

Across 15 listings, parking is mentioned multiple times but never described as tandem, nor are there hints like 'back-to-back' or 'tandem stall.' Examples include: 'a parking stall,' 'covered parking stall,' 'assigned parking space,' and '1 deeded parking stall,' all phrased in the singular without tandem qualifiers. Several listings note that the unit 'does not come with parking' or that parking is available for rent in neighboring buildings, again with no tandem references. In a building where tandem parking is a defining characteristic, at least one listing typically highlights or clarifies it, especially in Waikiki where parking details are important. The consistent absence of any tandem-related language across all remarks strongly suggests that tandem parking is not a building feature.

Across 15 listings for this building, none mention valet parking, valet service, or attended parking, even when discussing parking details extensively. Several listings specify parking situations such as a 'parking stall,' 'assigned parking space,' and parking 'available for rent in neighboring buildings' or 'right next door' at specific monthly rates, but never reference any valet component. One listing notes you 'may be able to rent in the neighboring building, hotel or park free along Ala Wai Canal or side streets,' again without any indication of valet service. Given how often parking is described and the absence of any terms like 'valet' or 'attended,' it is likely that the building does not offer valet parking. Therefore, the feature is set to false with high confidence.

I searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', and similar phrases and found none. While availability is noted and rental options referenced, there is no explicit waitlist system described in the remarks.

Out of 15 listings, 1 explicitly mentions keyed elevator security: the remarks state, 'This is a secure building with FOB entry, and keyed elevator access.' This is a direct and unambiguous description of the building’s elevator requiring a key or fob for access. No other listings contradict or suggest the absence of this feature; several simply note generic security like a 'secure lobby and elevator' or 'Secured Building with security camera,' which is consistent with keyed/fob access. Because keyed elevator access is a building-level feature and at least one unit in the building clearly advertises it, it is reasonable to infer that all units share this amenity. Therefore, the feature is set to true with very high confidence.

Listings explicitly mention FOB entry (key fob/card access) and keyed elevator access, which indicates electronic card/fob security is present. Set true with high confidence.

Across 15 listings, none explicitly mention a security guard, 24-hour security, or on-site security personnel. Security-related comments are limited to building access systems, such as 'This pet friendly condo provides a secure lobby and elevator' and 'This is a secure building with FOB entry, and keyed elevator access,' and one mention of a 'Secured Building with security camera.' These indicate controlled access and cameras but do not imply staffed guard service. Given that multiple listings highlight security features yet never reference a guard, it is likely that security is technological rather than personnel-based. Because there is no direct evidence of a security guard in any listing, the feature is set to false with moderately high confidence.

I searched for phrases like 'security patrol', 'roving security', and 'patrol service' and found none. Because there is no mention of a patrol service, this is set to false with medium confidence.

Out of 15 listings, 2 explicitly mention building-level video or electronic security features. One listing states: 'Secured Building with security camera. Fab elevator and a residence manager,' which directly confirms the presence of security cameras. Another notes: 'This is a secure building with FOB entry, and keyed elevator access,' indicating a controlled-access security system, which often coexists with video surveillance. No listings contradict or suggest the absence of such systems. Because at least one listing clearly confirms security cameras for this building, the appropriate value for the security_video feature is true with high confidence.

Across 15 listings for 222 Kaiulani, none mention central air, central AC, HVAC, forced air, or fan-coil systems, which are typically highlighted as major comfort features in this climate. Instead, cooling is implied to be via natural ventilation and fans, with remarks like units being on the 'cool side of the building' with 'cooling cross breezes' and 'Ceiling Fans in every room to keep you cool.' In a hot, humid area like Waikiki, the complete absence of any reference to central air in multiple remodeled and penthouse units strongly suggests the building does not have a central AC system. If central AC were present, it would almost certainly be advertised, especially in higher-end or fully renovated units. Therefore, the evidence points to the building lacking central air conditioning.

Across 15 listings in this Waikiki condo building, none mention split AC, mini-split, ductless AC, or individual split systems, even in units described as fully or extensively remodeled (e.g., 'Property was fully renovated from top to bottom in 2024' and 'STUNNING REMODEL! 50K investment into the remodel'). Several listings instead highlight features like 'Ceiling Fans in every room to keep you cool' and 'cooling cross breezes,' which are often emphasized when stronger mechanical cooling like split AC is absent. Given how commonly split systems are marketed as a selling point in Hawaii, their complete omission across all 15 remarks is notable. The repeated silence on AC type, even where other mechanical and comfort features are detailed, suggests the building does not have split AC systems. Therefore, the most likely building-level condition is that split AC is not present.

Across all 15 listings, none mention window air conditioning, window units, or wall AC, despite many detailed renovation and feature descriptions. Several units highlight other cooling features like 'cool side of the building,' 'cooling cross breezes,' and 'Ceiling Fans in every room to keep you cool,' but there is no reference to any type of AC. Multiple remodeled units list appliances exhaustively (e.g., 'refrigerator with ice maker, dishwasher, range with range hood and microwave' and 'Black stainless steel appliances') without including AC, which would typically be marketed if present. The consistent silence on AC across both basic and high-end remodels suggests that window AC is not a standard or notable feature in this building. Given the number of listings and the level of detail provided, the absence of any AC mention is strong negative evidence, so the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

15 of 16 current MLS listings list 'CONCRE' as the construction material, but across all public remarks none explicitly state 'concrete', 'reinforced concrete', or 'concrete building'. The strong MLS checkbox consensus suggests the building is concrete, though the absence of explicit mentions in agent remarks raises the possibility of copy/paste; overall evidence is moderately strong and warrants including the feature.

Across all 15 listings in the remarks corpus, none mention double wall or double-wall construction, nor any phrasing implying two walls or special wall construction. The descriptions focus on interior finishes, remodels, location, parking, lanais, and building security, but are silent on construction type. For example, listings highlight features like 'engineered hardwood flooring, quartz countertops, new electric, plumbing' and 'newly built kitchen cabinet with quartz countertop' without any reference to wall construction. Given that double wall construction is typically a marketed selling point when present, its complete absence in 15 separate remarks suggests the building likely does not emphasize or have this feature. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence based on the lack of explicit evidence.

Across 15 listings for 222 Kaiulani, none mention the building being constructed with hollow tile or use phrases like 'hollow tile construction.' The remarks focus on interior remodels, finishes, location, parking, and amenities, with repeated themes such as 'newly renovated,' 'vinyl planking flooring,' 'quartz countertops,' and 'secure building,' but no structural construction details. Given that agents often highlight concrete or hollow tile construction in Hawaii when present, the complete absence of such language in all 15 listings suggests the building is not being marketed as hollow tile. Because the corpus is fairly large and consistently silent on this specific feature, the most reasonable conclusion is that hollow tile construction is not a defining or advertised characteristic of this building.

Across all 15 listings in the remarks corpus, none explicitly mention the building being of 'masonry' or 'stucco' construction, nor any phrase like 'masonry and stucco.' The remarks focus on interior finishes (e.g., 'vinyl plank flooring,' 'granite countertops,' 'travertine tile,' 'quartz countertops') and location amenities near Waikiki Beach, but are silent on exterior construction materials. Given that multiple remodeled and penthouse units are described in detail without any reference to masonry or stucco, it is likely that this is not a highlighted or distinguishing feature of the building. Because the feature requires explicit evidence and there are 0 of 15 listings mentioning it, the most reasonable determination is that the building should not be tagged as having masonry and stucco construction. The confidence is moderate rather than absolute because absence of mention does not definitively prove absence of the feature, but the consistent silence across many listings is a strong indicator.

Across all 15 listings in the remarks corpus, none explicitly mention steel frame construction or use phrases like 'steel frame' or 'steel frame construction.' The descriptions focus on interior finishes (e.g., 'vinyl plank flooring,' 'quartz countertops,' 'travertine tile'), location, views, and amenities such as 'secure lobby and elevator' and 'community laundry on every floor,' but are silent on structural materials. In markets where steel framing is a notable selling point, it is often called out directly, and its complete absence in 15 separate remarks suggests it is not a highlighted or distinguishing feature of this building. Because there are zero explicit references and no indirect hints to steel framing, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building is not being marketed as steel frame construction. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence based on the consistent lack of evidence.

Across 15 listings in this Waikiki condo building, none of the remarks explicitly mention a concrete slab or solid concrete foundation, which are the key indicators for the 'construction_slab' feature. The descriptions focus on interior remodels, finishes, views, lanais, parking, and proximity to Waikiki Beach, but are silent on foundation type. For example, listings highlight features like 'vinyl plank throughout,' 'Travertine Tile in bath,' and 'waterproof vinyl planks flooring,' but do not reference any slab or concrete foundation. In many markets, slab foundations are common, but the task requires relying only on explicit evidence in the remarks. Because there are zero direct mentions out of 15 listings, the safest determination based on the provided text is that this feature should not be marked as present.

No analysis available

Across 15 listings for 222 Kaiulani, none mention wood frame construction or related phrases such as 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction.' The remarks focus on interior finishes (e.g., 'vinyl plank,' 'engineered hardwood flooring,' 'travertine tile'), location, views, and amenities, but are silent on structural materials. In urban Waikiki, mid-rise and high-rise condos are typically concrete or steel, and the repeated references to penthouses and secure lobby/elevator access suggest a larger, non-wood-frame structure. Because there are zero explicit mentions of wood framing in 15 separate descriptions, and the building type contextually points toward concrete construction, the most reasonable conclusion is that the building is not wood frame. Therefore, the feature is set to false with relatively high confidence.

Across 15 listings for this Waikiki condo building, none explicitly mention that the structure is 'constructed above ground' or use similar phrasing about above-ground construction or materials. The remarks focus on interior remodels, lanais, views, proximity to Waikiki Beach, and building amenities like secure lobby, elevator, and community laundry, but do not describe the construction type in those terms. While it is implicitly clear this is a multi-story urban condo tower (with penthouses, elevators, and city views), the feature as defined requires an explicit indication of above-ground construction. Because there are 0 of 15 listings with any direct reference to above-ground construction, the safest determination based strictly on the remarks is that this feature is not evidenced. The confidence is moderate-to-low because the absence is likely due to omission rather than proof the building is not above ground, but the instructions require relying only on explicit evidence.

Across the 15 listings in the remarks corpus, none explicitly mention brick construction or a brick exterior. There are no phrases such as 'brick exterior,' 'brick construction,' or 'brick-and-mortar' anywhere in the descriptions. Instead, the remarks focus on interior finishes (e.g., 'vinyl plank,' 'engineered hardwood flooring,' 'travertine tile,' 'quartz countertops') and location features in Waikiki. Given that multiple units and penthouses in the same building are described in detail without any reference to brick, it is likely that brick construction is not a notable or defining feature here. Because the determination is based on the absence of evidence rather than direct contradiction, the confidence is moderate rather than absolute.

Across 15 listings for this building, none mention 'single wall construction,' 'single wall,' or similar phrases like 'old Hawaiian style single wall' that are typically highlighted when present, especially in older Hawaii buildings. Instead, the remarks focus on interior remodels, finishes, and amenities (e.g., 'fully renovated from top to bottom in 2024,' 'quartz countertops,' 'engineered hardwood flooring,' 'secured building with security camera'), but are silent on construction type. Given how common it is for agents to flag single-wall construction as a material consideration, this consistent silence across all units suggests the building is likely not single-wall. The repeated emphasis on modern upgrades and security features further implies a more conventional, likely double-wall or concrete structure. Therefore, the evidence points toward the absence of single-wall construction in this building.

I searched for 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', 'NUC', '30-day minimum', and related terms. The remarks contain only a suggestion that monthly short-term rentals could increase income, but no explicit allowance for nightly/short-term rentals, so there is no evidence that STRs are permitted.

Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', and references to hotel management and found none. Because STR is not supported by the remarks, hotel pool participation is not indicated.

Looked for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', and similar language and found none. Since there is no evidence of a rental pool (and STR not supported), a mandatory pool is not indicated.

Out of 15 listings, at least 2 explicitly state that the units are Fee Simple. One listing advertises itself as the 'Lowest priced Fee Simple 3bd/2ba condo in Waikiki,' and another describes the unit as the 'Lowest priced Fee-Simple 3 bedroom penthouse in Waikiki.' No listings mention leasehold (LH) or any alternative land tenure. Because the feature is true if ANY listing in the building is Fee Simple, the presence of these explicit Fee Simple descriptions is sufficient to mark the building as having Fee Simple units. Since only 2 of 15 listings explicitly mention Fee Simple and the rest are silent on tenure, the observable ratio is 2 of 15 listings identified as Fee Simple, with the remainder unspecified. The clear, repeated use of 'Fee Simple' justifies a high confidence that the building has Fee Simple units.

Across all 15 listings in the remarks corpus, there are no explicit mentions of leasehold-related terms such as 'leasehold,' 'LH,' 'leased land,' 'land lease,' 'lease rent,' or any lease expiry/renewal information. Instead, at least two listings explicitly emphasize fee simple tenure, e.g., 'Lowest priced Fee Simple 3bd/2ba condo in Waikiki' and 'Lowest priced Fee-Simple 3 bedroom penthouse in Waikiki,' which strongly suggests that units in this building are fee simple. None of the other 13 listings contradict this or hint at leasehold status. Because the instructions specify setting the feature to true only if ANY listing is leasehold, and there is no such evidence here, the building is best classified as not having leasehold units. The confidence is high due to the explicit fee simple mentions and complete absence of leasehold indicators in a relatively large sample of 15 listings.

The building is described as Fee Simple in the remarks, indicating this is not a leasehold property; therefore no lease expiry year applies. I looked for 'lease expires', 'land lease to', or specific expiry years and found none.

Searched the public remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. Therefore there is no evidence the building is VA-approved from these remarks.

I searched the public remarks for explicit insurance coverage language ('fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'full insurance', etc.) and found none. Historical review also showed no such mentions, so the building is recorded as not fully insured by the HOA with high confidence unless countervailing user verification is provided.

Across the 15 listings in the remarks corpus, none explicitly mention fire sprinklers, a sprinkler system, or any kind of fire suppression feature. The descriptions focus on interior upgrades, appliances, flooring, parking, security, and location, with phrases like 'secured Building with security camera' and 'secure lobby and elevator' but nothing about sprinklers. Given how often safety and building systems are highlighted in condo marketing, the complete absence of terms such as 'fire sprinkler' or 'sprinkler system' in all 15 listings suggests that this feature is likely not present or at least not a selling point. Because there is no direct evidence either way, the determination is based on this consistent silence across multiple units in the same building. Therefore, the most reasonable conclusion from the provided remarks is that the building does not have a notable fire sprinkler system.

I searched the public remarks for phrases indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', 'passed fire inspection') and found no references. With no explicit statement in the remarks, the feature is set to false with medium-low confidence; manual verification is recommended.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Across 15 listings for this building, none explicitly mention any kind of ocean, water, or Pacific views, despite frequent references to proximity to Waikiki Beach. Instead, view descriptions are limited to 'city views from the private lanai,' 'panoramic views of the cityscape,' and 'mountain views,' with no suggestion of ocean exposure even in multiple penthouse units. Several listings emphasize being only a few blocks from the beach and walking to it, which would typically be paired with ocean-view marketing if such views were available. The repeated focus on city, mountain, and lanai size rather than water views suggests the building does not offer notable ocean views. Given the complete absence of ocean-view language in a view-heavy market like Waikiki, the evidence supports setting view_ocean to false with high confidence.

Out of 15 listings, 1 explicitly mentions a mountain view: the Penthouse #4 listing notes 'direct access to the lanai with mountain views and cool trade winds.' No listings state that views are limited to city or ocean only, and none say 'View: None.' Several other listings reference views generically (e.g., 'panoramic views of the cityscape'), but only this one clearly confirms a mountain view from a unit in the building. Because a mountain view from at least one unit implies the building itself offers mountain views, this supports setting view_mountain to true. The single explicit mention among many generally view-neutral remarks leads to a moderately high, but not perfect, confidence.

Across all 15 listings, none explicitly mention any Diamond Head views, DH views, or similar phrases, even in penthouse and lanai-focused descriptions. View-related remarks instead reference 'city views from the private lanai,' 'panoramic views of the cityscape,' and 'mountain views,' but never Diamond Head specifically. Several listings emphasize proximity to Diamond Head as an attraction (e.g., 'Explore nearby attractions including Diamond Head'), which is about location, not view. Given that agents highlight other view types when present yet omit Diamond Head entirely, it is likely that the building does not offer notable Diamond Head views. Therefore, view_diamond_head is set to false with high confidence.

There are explicit and repeated references to city views in the building’s listings. One unit notes 'city views from the private lanai,' directly confirming a city outlook. Another penthouse listing highlights a lanai that 'offers panoramic views of the cityscape,' which is a strong, unambiguous city-view description. A further penthouse is described as having 'spacious lanais overlooking the city,' reinforcing that upper units in this building enjoy city vistas. Out of 15 listings, at least 3 specifically mention city or cityscape views, and none state that views are absent or that the view is strictly something else, so it is reasonable to conclude the building has city views as a feature.

Across 15 listings for this building, none explicitly mention coastline, shoreline, or coastal views, even though many highlight proximity to Waikiki Beach and ocean activities. View descriptions that do appear are limited to 'city views from the private lanai,' 'panoramic views of the cityscape,' 'mountain views,' and lanais 'overlooking the city,' with no reference to seeing the coastline itself. Several listings emphasize being a few blocks from or minutes away from Waikiki Beach, but this is about location, not view. Given that agents repeatedly market other view types without once mentioning a coastline or ocean/shoreline view, it is likely that coastline views are not a notable feature of this building. Therefore, the building-level feature view_coastline is set to false with high confidence.

Across 15 listings, none mention any kind of garden, courtyard, or landscaped view; instead, when views are described they are explicitly urban, such as 'city views from the private lanai,' 'panoramic views of the cityscape,' and 'mountain views.' Several listings emphasize proximity to beaches, shopping, and city attractions, but there is no reference to on-site gardens or garden-facing units. One listing notes lanais 'overlooking the city' and another highlights being on the 'cool side of the building' with breezes, again without any garden or courtyard context. Given that multiple units describe their views and all are non-garden, the evidence points to the building not offering garden views. The complete absence of garden-related view language in a relatively large sample of remarks strongly supports setting view_garden to false.

Across all 15 listings, none mention any golf-related views such as a golf course, fairway, or greens. Instead, the few view descriptions are explicitly non-golf: one unit notes 'city views from the private lanai,' another highlights 'panoramic views of the cityscape,' and another mentions 'mountain views' and 'cool trade winds.' Several listings emphasize proximity to Waikiki Beach, Ala Wai Canal, shopping, and city attractions, but never reference a golf course outlook. Given this consistent pattern and the absence of any golf view language in a relatively large sample of units, it is very likely the building does not have golf course views.

Across 15 listings, none explicitly mention a marina, harbor, yacht harbor, or canal view, despite frequent discussion of other views and nearby features. One unit notes 'city views from the private lanai' and another mentions 'panoramic views of the cityscape,' while another highlights 'mountain views,' but there are no references to water, harbor, or marina vistas. The Ala Wai Canal is mentioned only in the context of free street parking 'along Ala Wai Canal,' not as a view. Given how often views are marketed in Waikiki, the consistent omission of marina/harbor/canal views strongly suggests they are not a building feature. Therefore, view_marina is set to false with high confidence.

Across 15 listings, none explicitly mention sunrise views, morning sun, or eastern exposure, even though many discuss other aspects of the units and building. Several listings highlight views and orientation in other ways, such as 'city views from the private lanai,' 'panoramic views of the cityscape,' 'mountain views and cool trade winds,' and 'spacious lanais overlooking the city,' but none reference sunrise or morning light. One listing even emphasizes being on the 'cool side of the building,' which often implies avoidance of direct morning or afternoon sun. Given that agents repeatedly describe positive features yet never mention sunrise views, it is likely this is not a notable building attribute. Therefore, the building is assessed as not having a marketed sunrise view feature.

Historical data previously rated High for sunset views. In the current public remarks 3–4 separate listings reference sunsets (e.g., 'Imagine... sunset dinners nearby', 'watching the sunset with your favorite beverage', 'swim, surf, sail and beautiful sunset'), indicating some units/penthouses have western/sunset outlooks. The MLS view checkbox is not set, but multiple agent remarks across listings corroborate that sunset views are available.

Across 15 listings for this building, none mention any cemetery-related views, despite multiple explicit references to other view types such as 'city views from the private lanai,' 'panoramic views of the cityscape,' 'mountain views,' and lanais 'overlooking the city.' The remarks are detailed about location and outlook (city, mountain, trade winds, breezes) but never reference a cemetery, which would typically be disclosed either positively ('cemetery view') or negatively if present. One listing notes 'views of the cityscape' and another mentions being near Ala Wai Canal, but still no cemetery mention. Given the consistent silence on cemetery views and the presence of alternative described views, it is most likely that the building does not have notable cemetery views.

I searched for explicit language indicating views of fireworks from the unit or lanai but found none. Listings mention proximity to Waikiki attractions but not viewing fireworks from the building, so fireworks_view is false with medium confidence.

No analysis available

Geographic designation determined by building address. This is not derived from MLS listing data.

Out of 15 listings in the remarks corpus, 1 explicitly mentions the building’s pet policy. The listing for 'Penthouse #4 at 222 Kaiulani Ave' clearly states: 'This pet friendly condo provides a secure lobby and elevator,' which is a direct indication that pets are allowed in the building. None of the other 14 listings contain any language restricting or prohibiting pets (e.g., no 'no pets' or similar phrases). Because building-level policies are typically consistent across units and the explicit statement is unambiguous, it strongly supports that pets are allowed. The absence of any contrary statements in the remaining listings further reinforces this conclusion, leading to a high confidence assessment.

Out of 15 listings, 1 explicitly mentions a resident manager in the building remarks. The listing states the building is a 'Secured Building with security camera. Fab elevator and a residence manager,' which directly confirms the presence of an on-site resident manager. No listings contradict this or suggest the absence of such a manager. Because this is a clear, explicit building-level description and applies generally to the condo, it strongly indicates the feature is present for the building as a whole. The single explicit mention among many unit listings is sufficient to conclude the building has a resident manager with high confidence.

Across all 15 listings in the remarks corpus, there are no explicit mentions of hotel operations, a hotel rental pool, a hotel front desk, a hotel program, management by a hotel, or the terms 'condotel' or 'condo-hotel.' The remarks consistently describe the property as standard Waikiki condos, emphasizing features like 'secure building,' 'community laundry,' 'parking may be available for rent in neighboring buildings,' and proximity to Waikiki Beach and shopping. Some listings mention investment potential and rental income, but only in generic terms such as 'great cash flow opportunity for investors' and 'could be higher if rented short-term on a monthly basis,' without tying this to hotel-style operations. One listing even notes you may rent parking in a 'neighboring building, hotel or park free along Ala Wai Canal,' which treats hotels as separate nearby entities, not as the managing operator. Given the complete absence of the required explicit condotel-related language in all 15 listings, the building is very likely not operating as a condotel.

No specific verification method available for coop. The declared value is retained as provided. Manual review recommended.