2121 Ala Wai

No year built data found in the 37 listings analyzed.

The floors value of 41 is a building-level attribute that cannot be directly verified from individual unit listings. This information typically comes from building documentation or county records.

The unit total value of 211 is a building-level attribute that cannot be directly verified from individual unit listings. This information typically comes from building documentation or county records.

I searched for explicit owner-occupancy cues such as a percentage, "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied," but none were provided in the remarks. Since the current value exists and there is no direct evidence to change it, I kept 46.0 with low confidence.

The public remarks repeatedly confirm that the building has 3 elevators, matching the current value. I found direct references in multiple listings, so this is high-confidence and consistent across remarks.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Across 37 listings, many explicitly detail what the HOA/maintenance fees include, e.g., 'maintenance fee covers electricity, water, sewer, hot water, internet, and basic cable' or 'ALL utilities included in the reasonable HOA fee — electricity, water, sewer, cable TV, and internet service.' At least 15 listings list utilities but none mention central AC or air conditioning as an included service. One listing notes 'While window AC installation is permitted,' implying no building-provided central AC. Another penthouse unit highlights 'central AC' as a unit feature, not a fee-included utility. With 0 of 37 listings stating AC is included in fees and some implying reliance on breezes instead, the evidence contradicts the declared value of True, though silence on AC in many remarks leaves a small margin of uncertainty.

Cable TV inclusion is very strongly supported. Across the remarks, multiple listings say "cable TV," "basic cable," or "HOA includes Cable TV," and the current MLS data shows CABTV in 18 of 20 listings. This appears consistent across multiple agents and is not likely copy-paste error.

There is good evidence that maintenance fees include common expenses. The MLS currently shows OTCOEX in 16 of 20 listings, and remarks mention "Other Common Expenses" and "common area maintenance." Evidence is moderate-to-strong, though less explicit than the utility items.

Across 37 listings, none mention co-op or cooperative ownership; instead several explicitly say 'fee simple 2 bedroom' or 'fee simple 2 bedroom, 1 bath condo,' indicating condominium, not co-op. Many listings detail what the HOA/maintenance fee includes, e.g., 'Maintenance fee includes electricity, water, hot water, Cable TV, internet' or 'all utilities are included in the maintenance fee,' but none of the 37 listings mention 'coop taxes,' 'co-op tax,' or any taxes being included. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting co-op taxes are part of the fee. This consistent silence strongly supports the declared value of False, with no clear caveats beyond the usual possibility of incomplete remarks.

Electricity inclusion is confirmed extremely strongly. The current MLS data shows ELECTR in all 20 of 20 listings, and remarks repeatedly say "electricity included," "maintenance fee includes electricity," or "all utilities included." This is consistent across the building.

Across the 37 listings, at least 18 explicitly describe what the HOA/maintenance fee includes. These remarks consistently say variations of “ALL utilities included,” or list specific items such as “electricity, water, sewer, cable TV, and internet service,” “electricity, water, hot water, sewer, internet, and basic cable,” or “Maintenance fees include Electricity, Water, Sewer, Internet and Cable.” None of these 18 listings mention gas, nor do any of the remaining listings reference gas service or gas being included. There is no conflicting statement like “gas included in maintenance fee.” This repeated omission, combined with detailed utility lists, strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that remarks are marketing text, not legal documents.

Hot water is repeatedly described as included in the maintenance fee. The MLS shows HOTWAT in 18 of 20 listings, and several remarks say "hot water," "hot/cold water," or "all utilities include... hot water." One listing has WTRHTR, but the overall evidence still strongly supports inclusion.

Internet inclusion is strongly supported by both MLS data and public remarks. The current MLS shows INTSER in 17 of 20 listings, and remarks mention "internet service," "wifi," "basic internet," and "high speed internet." This appears to be a building-level amenity, not a one-off agent error.

Across 37 listings, none mention a marina, boat slips, or any indication that marina access or boat-related costs are included in the HOA. Instead, remarks repeatedly specify what *is* covered: 'maintenance fee covers electricity, water, sewer, hot water, internet, and basic cable' or 'ALL utilities included in the reasonable HOA fee' with no reference to marina services. Several listings list extensive amenities—'pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room, guest parking'—but never a marina. There is no conflicting evidence. This consistent silence strongly supports the declared value of False, though it remains possible a separate, non-HOA marina exists nearby but not included in fees.

Sewer inclusion is well supported. The MLS currently shows SEWER in 15 of 20 listings, and remarks repeatedly include phrases like "sewer included" and "HOA covers... sewer." The evidence is consistent across multiple listings.

Water inclusion is very strongly supported. The MLS currently shows WATER in 18 of 20 listings, and remarks frequently say "water included," "HOA covers water," or list water among all-inclusive utilities. This is consistent across the building.

BBQ is very well supported across the listings, with many remarks explicitly referencing BBQ areas, BBQ grills, gas BBQs, and BBQ spaces. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and is not just a copy-paste checkbox; this is a confirmed shared building amenity.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none explicitly mention any form of bicycle facility such as 'bike storage,' 'bike room,' 'bike racks,' or 'bike and surfboard storage.' The remarks repeatedly list amenities like 'pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room,' 'guest parking,' 'car wash area,' and 'secured parking,' but never reference bikes. This consistent omission appears in 37 of 37 listings. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting bike storage exists. Given the detailed amenity descriptions and total silence on bike facilities, the declared value of False is well supported, though absence of mention is not absolute proof.

No specific verification method available for boat_dock. The declared value is retained as provided. Manual review recommended.

Car wash facilities are repeatedly confirmed in the remarks, including direct references to a "car wash area" and "car wash." The evidence is consistent enough across multiple listings to treat this as a building amenity.

Across 37 listings, none mention a 'clubhouse' or 'club house' specifically. Instead, 20+ listings consistently describe amenities such as 'pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room,' and 'party room' or 'meeting room,' e.g., 'resort-style amenities including a pool, sauna, BBQ, sauna, meeting room, recreation area.' Several also note a 'large lobby' or 'recreation deck,' but never a dedicated clubhouse facility. No listing contradicts this by stating a clubhouse exists. Given the strong, repeated amenity descriptions and total silence on any clubhouse, the declared value of True is likely incorrect, though it’s possible marketing simply omits the term.

Across 37 listings, none explicitly mention a concierge or front desk service. Instead, many listings emphasize security and management without concierge, using phrases like '24/7 security,' 'security guard,' 'secured building with resident manager,' and 'fob entry' (appearing in at least 10 of 37 listings). Several note a 'large lobby' or 'welcoming lobby' but never reference a staffed concierge desk. No remarks suggest concierge-like services, and there is no conflicting evidence. This consistent absence strongly supports the declared value of False, though it’s always possible a limited or informal service exists but is not marketed.

Across 37 listings, none mention any on-site 'dog park,' 'dog run,' or similar pet exercise area. Amenities are described in detail—'pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room,' 'sundeck, party room,' 'car wash area,' and 'guest parking'—in at least 20 of 37 listings, yet no listing adds a pet or dog facility. Several listings explicitly note pet restrictions, e.g., 'NO Pets allowed except service and emotional support animals' and 'No pets allowed,' which further argues against a dedicated dog park. With 0 of 37 listings citing such a feature and some discouraging pets, the declared value of False is strongly supported, though it remains possible a small informal pet area exists but is not marketed.

Across 37 listings, none explicitly mention a doorman, door attendant, or lobby attendant. Instead, at least 10 listings emphasize other security arrangements: quotes include '24/7 security', 'security guard', 'secured building with resident manager and security guard', and 'building offers 24 hour security w/ secured entries'. Several also note 'fob entry' and 'secured parking' but never a staffed doorman. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting a doorman presence. The consistent pattern of describing security without mentioning a doorman strongly supports the declared value of False, though absolute certainty is impossible without official building documentation.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none mention an exercise room, gym, fitness center, or similar facility. Amenities are repeatedly described as “pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room” or “pool, sauna, meeting room, guest parking, security guard,” with variations like “recreation/party area,” “sundeck, party room,” and “lounge, etc.” but never any “exercise room” or “fitness center.” At least 20 of 37 listings give detailed amenity lists without this feature, and no listing contradicts this absence. This consistent silence strongly supports the declared value of False, though it’s still possible a small, unadvertised gym exists.

No specific verification method available for limo_service. The declared value is retained as provided. Manual review recommended.

Meeting room is well supported by both the MLS history and the public remarks. Several listings explicitly reference a "meeting room" or similar shared event/community space, indicating this is a genuine building feature.

Strong, repeated evidence that 2121 Ala Wai offers patio/deck-type outdoor space. Across the listings, dozens of remarks mention a lanai or outdoor area, including 'covered lanai,' 'spacious lanai,' 'private lanai,' 'open lanai,' and 'recreation deck/sundeck.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the historical MLS amenity data.

Across 37 listings, none explicitly mention a jogging or walking path. Amenities are repeatedly described as 'pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room' or similar, with some adding 'sundeck, party room, car wash area' and 'large lobby' but never any 'jogging path' or 'walking trail.' Several listings detail views of the 'Ala Wai canal' and 'golf course' and emphasize proximity to beaches and parks, yet still do not claim an on-site path. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting such a feature exists. Given 0 of 37 listings mention it, the declared value of False is well supported, though silence cannot absolutely prove absence.

No specific verification method available for playground. The declared value is retained as provided. Manual review recommended.

Across 37 listings, none mention any kind of 'private yard,' 'fenced yard,' or 'private outdoor space' resembling a yard. Outdoor features are consistently described as 'private lanai,' 'spacious lanai,' or 'large lanai,' e.g., 'relax on the spacious lanai with gorgeous panoramic views' and 'enjoy your morning coffee on your private lanai.' These 37 of 37 listings focus on lanais and shared amenities like pool, sauna, BBQ, and recreation areas, with no reference to any yard access. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting a yard exists. This strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that absence of mention is the primary basis.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none mention a putting green or similar facility. Amenities are repeatedly described in detail as 'pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation/party room,' plus features like 'car wash area,' 'meeting room,' 'sundeck,' and 'guest parking.' Several listings list amenities exhaustively, e.g., 'Amenities include sauna, pool, sundeck, party room, recreation area with gas BBQ,' yet still omit any 'putting green' or golf practice area. No listing (0 of 37) provides conflicting evidence. This consistent silence, despite rich amenity descriptions, strongly supports the declared value of False, with only the caveat that unadvertised features are always a remote possibility.

Recreation area is corroborated by several listings using phrases like "recreation room," "recreation area," "recreation deck," and even "rec & meeting rooms." While not every listing mentions it, the repeated terminology across multiple remarks supports a real shared amenity.

Recreation room is supported by both MLS data and repeated remarks. About 11 of 20 listings show RECROO, and several remarks explicitly cite "recreation room," "rec & meeting rooms," or "recreation rooms." Evidence suggests this is a real shared amenity rather than a stray checkbox.

Across 37 listings, none explicitly mention an on-site restaurant, cafe, or in-building dining. References to food are always external, such as being 'minutes from world-famous beaches, restaurants, shopping' or 'near Waikiki Beach, Shopping Centers and restaurants' and 'close to bus lines, restaurants, shopping.' Amenities are consistently listed as pool, sauna, BBQ, party/recreation rooms, lobby, and guest parking, with zero mentions of any restaurant facility (0 of 37 listings). No remarks suggest an internal dining venue, and there is no conflicting evidence. This strong, consistent silence supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that unmentioned features are still theoretically possible but unlikely.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none mention any rooftop-specific feature such as a “rooftop deck,” “roof terrace,” or “rooftop amenities.” Amenities are repeatedly described as “pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation/party room” and sometimes “sundeck” or “recreation deck,” but always without any “roof” reference. At least 20 of 37 listings enumerate amenities in detail, yet still omit rooftop access. No listing provides conflicting evidence like “rooftop lounge” or “roof deck.” This consistent silence, despite extensive amenity descriptions, strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that an unadvertised rooftop area is still theoretically possible.

Sauna is one of the most consistently confirmed amenities in the dataset. Remarks repeatedly reference the sauna, including "dry saunas" and standard "sauna" wording, so this is a high-confidence building feature.

Across the supplied remarks, 0 listings clearly describe building storage units or lockers. The only related language is unit-level 'ample storage' in one penthouse description and 'secured bicycle storage' in one amenity list, which does not support a general storage-unit feature for buyers searching for lockers or extra storage space.

I searched for surfboard-specific storage language in the listings. The only storage-related reference was secured bicycle storage, which does not establish surfboard storage, so there is no evidence for this feature.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, amenities are repeatedly detailed as 'pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room,' plus guest parking, car wash, meeting/party rooms, sundeck, and security. In 0 of 37 listings is a 'tennis court' or any tennis facility mentioned, even in longer remarks that carefully list many building features. Several units describe the property as having 'resort-style amenities' yet still omit tennis, which would typically be highlighted if present. No remarks suggest or imply tennis facilities, and there is no conflicting evidence. This consistent silence strongly supports the declared value of False, with minimal caveats.

Trash chute appears to be supported primarily by the MLS amenity data rather than by the remarks, which rarely discuss it. Because the historical checkbox rate is very high, it should still be treated as a confirmed building feature.

Across 37 listings, none mention any form of valet service or valet parking. Instead, many explicitly reference self-parking features such as '1 assigned covered parking', '2 deeded parking stalls (tandem)', and '3 covered parking' as well as 'abundant guest parking' and 'guest stalls' (at least 15 of 37 listings). Several listings also highlight a 'gated parking garage' and 'secured parking' but never a staffed valet. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting valet exists. The consistent emphasis on self-parking and total silence on valet strongly support the declared value of False, with no notable caveats.

No specific verification method available for wall_fence. The declared value is retained as provided. Manual review recommended.

Across 37 listings, amenities are repeatedly described in detail as 'pool, sauna, BBQ area' or similar, with no mention of any 'whirlpool,' 'hot tub,' 'jacuzzi,' or 'spa.' I found 0 of 37 listings that reference any whirlpool-type feature, despite many saying 'resort-style amenities' or 'amenities galore with Pool, BBQ, Sauna, lounge, etc.' This consistent omission is meaningful because agents list other water amenities explicitly. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting a whirlpool exists. Thus, the evidence strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that amenities could change in the future without being reflected here.

Pool is strongly confirmed for 2121 Ala Wai. Dozens of current public remarks across many listings explicitly reference it, including phrases like "a pool," "renovated pool," "beautiful pool area," and "swimming pool." This is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the MLS amenities data, so it appears to be a real shared building amenity rather than copy-paste noise.

Across 37 listings, many mention a “pool,” “swimming pool,” or “new pool,” but none explicitly describe it as a “heated pool” or “heated swimming pool.” For example, remarks state “pool, sauna and security,” “new pool, BBQs, sauna,” and “re-tiled pool, sauna, rec & meeting rooms,” yet never add “heated.” I counted 20+ listings referencing a pool, all silent on heating. No listing claims the pool is heated, and there is no contradictory evidence. Given this consistent omission in amenity-rich descriptions, the declared value of False is supported, though silence is not absolute proof.

I searched for phrases like "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," and similar saline-pool wording. The remarks mention a pool many times, including a renovated pool, but never identify it as salt water.

Laundry-in-unit is strongly confirmed across the listings. Multiple remarks from different agents explicitly say "in-unit laundry," "washer and dryer inside the unit," "washer/dryer in-unit," and "stacked washer/dryer," making this a consistent building feature rather than a one-off. The evidence is broad and repetitive, so this should be treated as a reliable amenity offered by the building in some or many units.

Across 37 listings, 0 mention any kind of shared or 'community laundry' or 'laundry room.' Instead, at least 12 listings explicitly highlight in‑unit laundry, using phrases like 'in-unit washer and dryer,' 'washer/dryer in-unit,' 'There is also a washer/dryer inside the unit!' and 'stacked washer/dryer.' No listing references coin laundry, laundry on each floor, or common laundry facilities, and there is no conflicting evidence suggesting shared laundry exists. This consistent emphasis on in‑unit laundry strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that silence alone from other units cannot absolutely rule out any shared laundry area.

I looked for public remarks describing coin laundry, paid laundry, laundry fees, or card-operated washers. The listings instead reference in-unit laundry, so there is no evidence from remarks that the building has paid community laundry.

I searched for wording like "laundry on every floor," "community laundry each floor," and similar floor-specific laundry references. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer or W/D, so there is no public-remarks evidence that community laundry exists on every floor.

Strong evidence across listings that the building has parking: 20/20 MLS records list parking features and multiple remarks state 'covered parking', 'parking stall', and 'secured parking'. Examples: 'Two covered parking stalls add convenience' and 'one assigned covered parking stall'. Evidence is consistent across agents and listings.

Assigned/reserved parking is strongly confirmed across the listing set. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "assigned parking," "one assigned parking," "one assigned covered parking stall," and "2 deeded parking stalls," which is consistent across many agents rather than a one-off note.

Covered parking is strongly supported across the remarks, with many listings explicitly stating 'one assigned covered parking stall,' 'covered parking,' or 'gated parking garage.' The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents and listing periods, not just a single copied description. This is a stable building feature for buyer search purposes.

The remarks directly confirm deeded parking, including a listing that says the unit comes with "9 deeded parking stalls." That is strong public evidence that parking can be deeded with this building/unit.

Across 37 listings, none mention EV charging or related terms such as 'EV charging,' 'electric vehicle,' 'charging stations,' or 'Tesla.' Parking is frequently described in detail, e.g., 'secured parking with multiple guest stalls,' 'gated parking garage with visitor parking,' and specific stall counts like '3 PARKING STALLS: 1 tandem, 1 free standing,' yet no listing adds EV-specific features. Several note car wash areas and security in the garage but remain silent on EV infrastructure. With 0 of 37 listings referencing EV charging and no contradictory evidence, the absence is meaningful, so the declared value of False is well supported, though future upgrades could change this.

I looked for parking fee wording such as monthly parking charge, stall rent, or additional parking cost. The remarks discuss assigned, covered, and deeded stalls, but do not mention any separate parking fee.

Guest parking is clearly present in the building. It is mentioned in many listings across different agents, including phrases like "guest parking," "guest stalls," "ample guest parking," and "9 guest parking stalls," indicating consistent building-level availability.

Secured-entry parking is well supported by the remarks, which frequently reference 'gated parking,' 'secured parking,' 'secure entry & intercom,' and 'fob entry.' These descriptions come from many listings and are reinforced by the historical MLS pattern, suggesting the feature is real and consistent. The evidence is strong enough to include for building-level search.

Confidence 90%: 2/16 MLS listings mark TANDEM, and one remark clearly states '2 deeded parking stalls (tandem) ... in the secure parking structure'.

Across 37 listings, none mention valet parking or valet services. Instead, they consistently reference self-parking features such as '1 assigned covered parking', '2 deeded parking stalls (tandem)', 'gated parking garage with visitor parking', and '3 covered parking'. Several listings highlight 'guest parking' or 'abundant guest parking' but never describe any 'valet' or 'attended' component. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting valet service exists. The uniform emphasis on self-managed, assigned, and guest stalls strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that unadvertised services are always possible but unlikely here.

I searched for waitlist language like parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or join the waitlist, and found none. The public remarks consistently describe available assigned/deeded parking rather than a queued system, so this is set to false.

Across 37 listings, several explicitly mention building access control but none describe a keyed or fob-restricted elevator. Security is referenced frequently: e.g., '24/7 security,' 'secured building with resident manager and security guard,' and 'fob entry' (2 listings note 'fob entry' for the building, not the elevator). One listing notes '3 elevators' and another 'large lobby and 3 elevators' without any hint of key or fob access. No remarks state 'keyed elevator,' 'fob elevator,' or similar, and there is no conflicting evidence. Given 0 of 37 listings mention restricted elevator access while many detail other security features, the declared value of False is well supported, though absence of mention is not absolute proof.

The listings repeatedly describe secured entry with fob/card-style access, including explicit "fob entry" wording. That is strong evidence the building has a card/fob security system.

Security guard service is strongly supported by both MLS history and current remarks. Roughly a dozen listings explicitly mention it, with multiple agents using phrases such as "24/7 security," "24-hour security," "security guard," "security patrol," and "on-site security," which suggests this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste mistake. The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears stable over time.

I looked for patrol-specific wording such as "security patrol," "roving security," or "patrolled building." The remarks do include an explicit "security patrol" mention, so this feature is supported.

Across 37 listings, many mention general security but none explicitly reference video systems. Phrases include '24/7 security' (3 listings), '24-hour security' (2 listings), and multiple notes of a 'security guard' or 'on-site security' (at least 6 listings). Several also say 'secured building' or 'secured entries' and mention fob entry, but no listing states 'security cameras,' 'video surveillance,' 'CCTV,' or similar. There is no contradictory claim that cameras are absent, but the complete silence on video in all 37 listings weakens support. Given only generic security references, the declared value of True for security_video is not supported, though cameras may exist but are unadvertised.

Among 37 listings, only 1 explicitly mentions central AC: the penthouse remarks state 'An in-unit washer and dryer, central AC, and ample storage provide the best in home comforts,' clearly confirming central air in at least that unit. Another listing notes 'no need for A/C' due to cool breezes, but does not say AC is absent. The remaining 35 listings are silent on air conditioning, focusing instead on breezes and utilities. With one clear, uncontradicted reference and no statements denying central AC, the evidence moderately supports the declared value of True, though building-wide central AC is not definitively proven.

Across 37 listings, none explicitly mention 'split AC,' 'mini-split,' or 'ductless' systems. One listing notes 'central AC,' which typically conflicts with individual split systems, while another says 'no need for A/C' due to cool trade winds, implying reliance on natural ventilation. A separate listing states 'window AC installation is permitted,' suggesting the building is not already equipped with split systems. Overall, 0 of 37 listings provide evidence of split AC, and several imply alternative cooling methods. This strongly supports the declared value of False, though absence of mention is not absolute proof.

Multiple listings indicate window AC is available or permitted in the building, including explicit language that 'window AC installation is permitted.' Historical data was previously high confidence with at least two remarks referencing window air conditioners, so this appears to be a real building-level option rather than a copy-paste error. While many agents emphasize cool breezes or no need for A/C, the explicit window-AC remark supports keeping this feature enabled.

Concrete construction is strongly supported across the full current MLS set: 20 of 20 listings indicate CONCRE. The remarks repeatedly describe the same Waikiki high-rise at 2121 Ala Wai, with no conflicting evidence suggesting a different construction type.

There is no remark-level evidence for double-wall construction across the listings reviewed. With only 3 of 20 current MLS entries checking DOUWAL and no supporting description in the remarks, this looks like an unchecked or copied MLS field rather than a confirmed building feature.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none of the remarks mention “hollow tile” or “hollow tile construction.” The descriptions focus on views, amenities, security, utilities, and renovations, with quotes like “well managed building,” “resort-style amenities,” and “Building is 100% Hurricane Insured,” but never construction type. With 0 of 37 listings referencing hollow tile, there is no explicit evidence contradicting the declared value of False. The silence across a large sample suggests hollow tile is not a marketed or defining feature here. I therefore judge the declared value of False as supported, with the caveat that construction details might exist outside these remarks.

Only 2 of 20 current listings flag MASSTU, while none of the public remarks explicitly describe masonry or stucco construction. The remarks are otherwise highly repetitive and focused on views/amenities, which suggests the masonry-stucco checkbox is likely copy-paste noise rather than verified building construction.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none mention 'steel frame' or 'steel frame construction.' The remarks focus on views, amenities, security, utilities, and management, with quotes like 'well managed building,' 'resort-style amenities,' and 'building is 100% Hurricane Insured,' but never reference structural materials. I counted 0 of 37 listings that even hint at steel framing. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting a steel frame. Given this complete silence on steel construction, the declared value of False is supported, though the absence of mention is indirect rather than a technical confirmation.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none explicitly mention a “concrete slab,” “solid concrete foundation,” or any slab-style construction detail. The remarks focus on views, amenities, security, utilities, and renovations, with quotes like “well-managed building,” “secured building,” and “resort-style amenities,” but never structural descriptions. With 0 of 37 listings referencing slab construction, the corpus is effectively silent on this feature. There is no contradictory evidence suggesting a slab either. This silence moderately supports the declared value of False, though absence of mention is not definitive proof.

No analysis available

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none explicitly mention 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction.' Instead, remarks consistently emphasize a high-rise character: repeated references to 'high-floor condo,' '41st floor,' 'Penthouse suite,' and '33rd floor' (at least 8 listings) strongly imply a concrete/steel high-rise rather than wood framing. No listing (0 of 37) provides contrary evidence such as 'wood frame building' or similar wording. The complete silence on wood framing, combined with clear high-rise cues, supports the declared value of False, though the absence of direct structural specs leaves a small margin of uncertainty.

Only 1 of 20 current MLS records shows ABOGRO, and the public remarks do not describe the building as above-ground constructed. The listings instead emphasize floor level, views, and amenities, which is not enough to establish this as a true building-level construction feature.

Across the provided remarks, there are no explicit mentions of brick construction, brick exterior, or brick-and-mortar. The strong historical record and the lack of supporting language in dozens of listing remarks indicate brick should be omitted/corrected to false.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none of the remarks mention 'single wall construction,' 'single wall,' or similar phrases. Instead, they emphasize modern or updated interiors, e.g., 'completely renovated interior,' 'Beautifully Renovated in 2021 with Modern Upgrades,' and 'smooth ceilings and fresh white paint,' which are more typical of double-wall or concrete high-rise construction. Zero of 37 listings provide explicit evidence of single-wall construction, and there is no contradictory statement suggesting it. Given this consistent silence and the building’s high-rise character, the declared value of False is well supported, though absence of explicit construction details leaves a small degree of uncertainty.

The clearest policy language says the building permits only 30-day minimum rentals, which is a direct indication that true short-term rentals are not allowed. Some remarks mention mid-term rentals or investment use, but those do not override the 30-day minimum restriction.

I looked for hotel rental pool, hotel-managed units, or branded rental-program language such as Hilton or Ritz pool and found none. Because short-term rentals are not allowed here, a hotel pool would also not apply.

I searched for terms like mandatory pool, required to participate, or cannot opt out and found no evidence. The remarks read like a standard condo building with normal ownership use, not a required hotel-rental arrangement.

Among 37 listings, at least 3 explicitly state fee simple tenure. One listing says, 'fee simple 2 bedroom, 1 bath condo,' another notes a 'Desirable Fee Simple 2 bedroom end unit,' and a third mentions 'spacious, fee simple 2 bedroom' in Waikiki. No listings mention leasehold, ground lease, or any conflicting tenure terms. The majority of other remarks are silent on land tenure, focusing on views, amenities, and VA loan assumptions. With 3 of 37 clearly fee simple and no contrary evidence, the declared value of True is strongly supported, though some units’ tenure remains unspecified.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, at least 2 explicitly state 'Desirable Fee Simple 2 bedroom' or 'fee simple 2 bedroom, 1 bath condo,' confirming fee-simple units. However, one listing mentions 'Desirable Fee Simple 2 bedroom end unit,' which strongly implies that non-fee (i.e., leasehold) units also exist in the building, otherwise specifying 'fee simple' would be unnecessary. No remarks explicitly say 'leasehold,' 'LH,' or give lease expiry dates, and most listings are silent on tenure. With 2 of 37 clearly FS and suggestive wording that LH units may exist, I judge the declared value False as unsupported, with the caveat that no listing directly labels a unit as leasehold.

I searched for leasehold language such as ground lease, lease expires, renewed through, or lease expiry year, but found nothing. The listings instead describe the property as fee simple, so there is no evidence that a land lease expiry applies here.

Public remarks repeatedly and clearly state that VA loans can be assumed or used for financing. This is strong, direct evidence from multiple listings, so the feature is set to true with very high confidence.

The remarks directly support full building insurance coverage with clear, explicit wording. This is strong evidence that the HOA/building is fully insured.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none explicitly mention fire sprinklers or a sprinkler system. Remarks repeatedly highlight safety and building features such as “24/7 security,” “secured building with resident manager and security guard,” “gated parking garage,” and “well managed, fully insured building,” but never reference “fire sprinklers” or “fire suppression.” With 0 of 37 listings mentioning sprinklers, and no contradictory claims like “equipped with fire sprinklers,” the corpus neither proves nor disproves their existence. However, this strong, consistent silence supports treating the declared value of False as plausible, with the caveat that absence of mention is not definitive proof.

I searched the remarks for direct fire/life safety compliance language, including FLSE passed and fire inspection language, but found nothing. With no explicit evidence in the public remarks, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as false/unknown in practice.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Multiple listings explicitly reference ocean views or Waikiki Beach from either the walkway or interior (quotes include: "kitchen and entry enjoy views of the ocean", "Partial Ocean view from kitchen window", "OCEAN & DIAMOND HEAD VIEWS"). Evidence appears across several agents and listing remarks, indicating some units in the building offer ocean views.

Mountain views are strongly supported across the building, with many listings mentioning 'Koolau mountains,' 'mauka views,' 'mountain breezes,' and 'mountain side.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and looks like a building-level feature, not a one-off unit trait.

Across 37 listings, Diamond Head views are explicitly mentioned in at least 8 listings. Examples include: “Breathtaking OCEAN & DIAMOND HEAD VIEWS afforded by this Diamond Head-end unit,” “peekaboo Diamond Head view,” “Spectacular ... and peekaboo Diamond Head View!,” “gorgeous panoramic views of the Ala Wai canal, golf course, Diamond Head,” and “spectacular views of ... Diamond Head.” No listing states that Diamond Head cannot be seen; others are simply silent, focusing on mountains, canal, or city. The repeated explicit mentions directly contradict the declared value of false, so it is unsupported, with no meaningful conflicting evidence.

City views are well documented across many listings, including phrases like 'city skyline,' 'city lights,' and 'sparkling city.' Multiple independent remarks confirm this feature, so it appears to be a real building-level offering.

Evidence for coastline views is weaker than for city or sunset views, but it is not absent. A few listings have COASTL in MLS data (3/20), and remarks repeatedly mention ocean-facing sightlines, including 'ocean view from the kitchen,' 'peek-a-boo ocean views,' and 'ocean views from the walkway.' Because the remarks do not consistently use the specific coastline/shoreline language, this is a lower-confidence inclusion.

Across 37 listings, views are consistently described as mountains, city, ocean, canal, golf course, and Diamond Head, with quotes like “panoramic mountain views…Ala Wai Canal, golf course, and city lights” and “breathtaking panoramic views of the Ala Wai canal, golf course, Diamond Head, mountains.” None of the 37 listings mention a “garden view,” “courtyard view,” or similar landscaped outlook. Several emphasize “city lights” and “sparkling city,” reinforcing an urban, not garden, setting. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting any unit has a garden view, so the declared value of false is well supported, with no noted caveats.

Golf course views are one of the clearest recurring features in the listing remarks, with many references to 'Ala Wai Golf Course' and 'golf course greens.' The evidence is broad and consistent across multiple listings, supporting a building-level feature.

Marina-type views are consistently supported by the remarks, most often as 'Ala Wai Canal' or canal-facing views. This is reinforced across many listings, suggesting the building regularly offers canal/marina-oriented units.

Sunrise views are supported by multiple remarks, including explicit references to 'spectacular sunrises' and morning east-side exposure. While less common than mountain or canal views, the mentions are direct enough to confirm the feature for the building.

There is moderate-to-strong evidence for sunset views. Several listings reference 'Friday night fireworks,' 'sunset practice,' and 'evening views' that imply west-facing or sunset-oriented sightlines, though the feature is less consistently documented than city views. The MLS history also shows 4/20 SUNSET, so this appears to be a real building-level option rather than agent noise.

Across 37 listings, views are consistently described as mountains, Ala Wai Canal, golf course, city, Diamond Head, ocean, and fireworks, with quotes like “panoramic views of the Ala Wai canal, golf course, Diamond Head, mountains” and “breathtaking OCEAN & DIAMOND HEAD VIEWS.” None of the 37 listings mention a cemetery view or anything like “overlooks cemetery.” There is no conflicting evidence suggesting any unit faces a cemetery. This repeated emphasis on other view types, combined with total silence about cemeteries, strongly supports the declared value of false, with no clear caveats.

There are multiple direct references to viewing Friday night fireworks from within the building or from units, including from the kitchen window and the walkway. This is strong, repeated evidence that fireworks views are available from some units.

No analysis available

Geographic designation determined by building address. This is not derived from MLS listing data.

In the 37-listing corpus, 4 listings explicitly address pets. One states, 'Emotional support animals are allowed by board approval,' another says, 'NO Pets allowed except service and emotional support animals,' and two more repeat 'No pets allowed except for service & emotional support animals' or simply 'No pets allowed.' No listings mention dogs, cats, or general pet-friendliness. Thus, 4 of 37 listings clearly indicate a no-pet policy with limited exceptions for service/ESA animals, and none contradict this. This strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that assistance animals are permitted by law and board approval.

This feature is very strongly supported. Numerous current listings explicitly mention a resident manager on-site, including phrases like 'on-site resident manager,' 'resident manager and security guard,' and 'security with resident manager.' The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to be a real building-level amenity, not just a copied MLS checkbox.

Across 37 listings, none explicitly mention condotel characteristics such as a 'hotel rental pool,' 'hotel front desk,' 'hotel program,' or being 'managed by hotel,' nor do they use the words 'condotel' or 'condo-hotel.' Instead, remarks repeatedly describe it as a 'well managed condo' or 'well-managed building' with standard residential amenities, 30-day minimum rentals, and VA loan assumptions, all typical of non-hotel condos. At least 2 listings note '30 day minimum rental,' which contradicts nightly hotel-style use. With 0 of 37 listings indicating hotel operations and no conflicting evidence, the declared value of False is well supported, though absence of mention is not absolute proof.

No specific verification method available for coop. The declared value is retained as provided. Manual review recommended.