2121 Ala Wai

No year built data found in the 37 listings analyzed.

The floors value of 41 is a building-level attribute that cannot be directly verified from individual unit listings. This information typically comes from building documentation or county records.

The unit total value of 211 is a building-level attribute that cannot be directly verified from individual unit listings. This information typically comes from building documentation or county records.

I looked for explicit owner-occupancy references such as percentages, "owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or similar language, but found none. The current 46% value is therefore retained, with low confidence because there is no supporting evidence in the remarks.

Public remarks repeatedly and directly confirm that the building has 3 elevators. This matches the current value and is consistent across multiple listings, so confidence is very high.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Across 37 listings, many explicitly detail what the HOA/maintenance fees include, e.g., 'maintenance fee covers electricity, water, sewer, hot water, internet, and basic cable' or 'ALL utilities included in the reasonable HOA fee — electricity, water, sewer, cable TV, and internet service.' At least 15 listings list utilities but none mention central AC or air conditioning as an included service. One listing notes 'While window AC installation is permitted,' implying no building-provided central AC. Another penthouse unit highlights 'central AC' as a unit feature, not a fee-included utility. With 0 of 37 listings stating AC is included in fees and some implying reliance on breezes instead, the evidence contradicts the declared value of True, though silence on AC in many remarks leaves a small margin of uncertainty.

Cable inclusion is consistently confirmed across the building. Multiple remarks state that the maintenance fee includes “Cable TV,” “basic cable,” or “HOA includes ... cable,” and the MLS currently shows CABTV in 18/20 listings. This looks like a stable building-level benefit, not a one-off agent note.

There is good evidence that the maintenance fee includes some common-area expense coverage. The MLS currently shows OTCOEX in 15/20 records, and public remarks include phrases like “common area maintenance” or “Other Common Expenses.” The pattern is consistent enough to treat as a real building feature.

Across 37 listings, none mention co-op or cooperative ownership; instead several explicitly say 'fee simple 2 bedroom' or 'fee simple 2 bedroom, 1 bath condo,' indicating condominium, not co-op. Many listings detail what the HOA/maintenance fee includes, e.g., 'Maintenance fee includes electricity, water, hot water, Cable TV, internet' or 'all utilities are included in the maintenance fee,' but none of the 37 listings mention 'coop taxes,' 'co-op tax,' or any taxes being included. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting co-op taxes are part of the fee. This consistent silence strongly supports the declared value of False, with no clear caveats beyond the usual possibility of incomplete remarks.

Electricity inclusion is confirmed by both MLS and remarks. The current MLS data shows ELECTR in 20/20 listings, and numerous public remarks say “maintenance fee includes electricity,” “all utilities included,” or similar. This is one of the strongest verified features in the building.

Across the 37 listings, at least 18 explicitly describe what the HOA/maintenance fee includes. These remarks consistently say variations of “ALL utilities included,” or list specific items such as “electricity, water, sewer, cable TV, and internet service,” “electricity, water, hot water, sewer, internet, and basic cable,” or “Maintenance fees include Electricity, Water, Sewer, Internet and Cable.” None of these 18 listings mention gas, nor do any of the remaining listings reference gas service or gas being included. There is no conflicting statement like “gas included in maintenance fee.” This repeated omission, combined with detailed utility lists, strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that remarks are marketing text, not legal documents.

Hot water is repeatedly described as included in the maintenance fee. Remarks say things like “includes electricity, water and hot water” and “HOA includes ... hot water,” matching the MLS pattern of HOTWAT in 18/20 listings. Evidence is very strong across multiple listings and agents.

Internet service is consistently included for this building. Remarks mention “internet service,” “basic internet,” “wifi,” and “high speed internet,” while the MLS currently shows INTSER in 18/20 listings. This appears to be a stable, building-wide inclusion.

Across 37 listings, none mention a marina, boat slips, or any indication that marina access or boat-related costs are included in the HOA. Instead, remarks repeatedly specify what *is* covered: 'maintenance fee covers electricity, water, sewer, hot water, internet, and basic cable' or 'ALL utilities included in the reasonable HOA fee' with no reference to marina services. Several listings list extensive amenities—'pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room, guest parking'—but never a marina. There is no conflicting evidence. This consistent silence strongly supports the declared value of False, though it remains possible a separate, non-HOA marina exists nearby but not included in fees.

Sewer inclusion is well supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Listings repeatedly say “sewer included,” “HOA includes ... sewer,” or “maintenance fee covers sewer,” with the MLS currently showing SEWER in 16/20 records. This is strong enough to verify as true.

Water is very strongly supported as an included expense. Public remarks repeatedly mention “water included,” “HOA covers ... water,” and “all utilities included,” and the MLS currently shows WATER in 18/20 listings. Evidence across listings is consistent and high confidence.

BBQ is consistently confirmed across the listings. Roughly 19 of 20 MLS entries include it, and public remarks repeatedly use phrases like "BBQ," "BBQ grills," "gas BBQs," and "outdoor BBQ area." This looks like a stable building amenity, not a copy-paste anomaly.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none explicitly mention any form of bicycle facility such as 'bike storage,' 'bike room,' 'bike racks,' or 'bike and surfboard storage.' The remarks repeatedly list amenities like 'pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room,' 'guest parking,' 'car wash area,' and 'secured parking,' but never reference bikes. This consistent omission appears in 37 of 37 listings. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting bike storage exists. Given the detailed amenity descriptions and total silence on bike facilities, the declared value of False is well supported, though absence of mention is not absolute proof.

No specific verification method available for boat_dock. The declared value is retained as provided. Manual review recommended.

Car wash facilities are supported by the MLS and remarks. Around 11 of 20 listings include CRWSH, and multiple public remarks directly mention a "car wash area" or "car wash." The consistency across listings makes this a credible shared building feature.

Across 37 listings, none mention a 'clubhouse' or 'club house' specifically. Instead, 20+ listings consistently describe amenities such as 'pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room,' and 'party room' or 'meeting room,' e.g., 'resort-style amenities including a pool, sauna, BBQ, sauna, meeting room, recreation area.' Several also note a 'large lobby' or 'recreation deck,' but never a dedicated clubhouse facility. No listing contradicts this by stating a clubhouse exists. Given the strong, repeated amenity descriptions and total silence on any clubhouse, the declared value of True is likely incorrect, though it’s possible marketing simply omits the term.

Across 37 listings, none explicitly mention a concierge or front desk service. Instead, many listings emphasize security and management without concierge, using phrases like '24/7 security,' 'security guard,' 'secured building with resident manager,' and 'fob entry' (appearing in at least 10 of 37 listings). Several note a 'large lobby' or 'welcoming lobby' but never reference a staffed concierge desk. No remarks suggest concierge-like services, and there is no conflicting evidence. This consistent absence strongly supports the declared value of False, though it’s always possible a limited or informal service exists but is not marketed.

Across 37 listings, none mention any on-site 'dog park,' 'dog run,' or similar pet exercise area. Amenities are described in detail—'pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room,' 'sundeck, party room,' 'car wash area,' and 'guest parking'—in at least 20 of 37 listings, yet no listing adds a pet or dog facility. Several listings explicitly note pet restrictions, e.g., 'NO Pets allowed except service and emotional support animals' and 'No pets allowed,' which further argues against a dedicated dog park. With 0 of 37 listings citing such a feature and some discouraging pets, the declared value of False is strongly supported, though it remains possible a small informal pet area exists but is not marketed.

Across 37 listings, none explicitly mention a doorman, door attendant, or lobby attendant. Instead, at least 10 listings emphasize other security arrangements: quotes include '24/7 security', 'security guard', 'secured building with resident manager and security guard', and 'building offers 24 hour security w/ secured entries'. Several also note 'fob entry' and 'secured parking' but never a staffed doorman. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting a doorman presence. The consistent pattern of describing security without mentioning a doorman strongly supports the declared value of False, though absolute certainty is impossible without official building documentation.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none mention an exercise room, gym, fitness center, or similar facility. Amenities are repeatedly described as “pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room” or “pool, sauna, meeting room, guest parking, security guard,” with variations like “recreation/party area,” “sundeck, party room,” and “lounge, etc.” but never any “exercise room” or “fitness center.” At least 20 of 37 listings give detailed amenity lists without this feature, and no listing contradicts this absence. This consistent silence strongly supports the declared value of False, though it’s still possible a small, unadvertised gym exists.

No specific verification method available for limo_service. The declared value is retained as provided. Manual review recommended.

Meeting room has strong corroboration. About 15 of 20 MLS listings include MEEROO, and multiple remarks explicitly say "meeting room" or describe a reservable event/community space. This is one of the better-supported amenities in the set.

Strong, repeated evidence that 2121 Ala Wai offers patio/deck-type outdoor space. At least 20+ listing remarks reference a "private lanai," "spacious lanai," "open lanai," "covered lanai," "sundeck," or "recreation deck," and the MLS amenities data shows 19/20 listings with PATDEC/COVPAT. The consistency across many different listing descriptions suggests this is a real building feature, not just copy-paste noise.

Across 37 listings, none explicitly mention a jogging or walking path. Amenities are repeatedly described as 'pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room' or similar, with some adding 'sundeck, party room, car wash area' and 'large lobby' but never any 'jogging path' or 'walking trail.' Several listings detail views of the 'Ala Wai canal' and 'golf course' and emphasize proximity to beaches and parks, yet still do not claim an on-site path. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting such a feature exists. Given 0 of 37 listings mention it, the declared value of False is well supported, though silence cannot absolutely prove absence.

No specific verification method available for playground. The declared value is retained as provided. Manual review recommended.

Across 37 listings, none mention any kind of 'private yard,' 'fenced yard,' or 'private outdoor space' resembling a yard. Outdoor features are consistently described as 'private lanai,' 'spacious lanai,' or 'large lanai,' e.g., 'relax on the spacious lanai with gorgeous panoramic views' and 'enjoy your morning coffee on your private lanai.' These 37 of 37 listings focus on lanais and shared amenities like pool, sauna, BBQ, and recreation areas, with no reference to any yard access. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting a yard exists. This strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that absence of mention is the primary basis.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none mention a putting green or similar facility. Amenities are repeatedly described in detail as 'pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation/party room,' plus features like 'car wash area,' 'meeting room,' 'sundeck,' and 'guest parking.' Several listings list amenities exhaustively, e.g., 'Amenities include sauna, pool, sundeck, party room, recreation area with gas BBQ,' yet still omit any 'putting green' or golf practice area. No listing (0 of 37) provides conflicting evidence. This consistent silence, despite rich amenity descriptions, strongly supports the declared value of False, with only the caveat that unadvertised features are always a remote possibility.

Recreation area appears to be a genuine building amenity. Roughly 10 of 20 MLS entries include RECARE, and remarks repeatedly reference "recreation area," "recreation/party area," "recreation deck," and related shared spaces. The wording varies, but the amenity is consistently present.

Recreation room is supported by both MLS data and repeated remarks. About 11 of 20 listings show RECROO, and several remarks explicitly cite "recreation room," "rec & meeting rooms," or "recreation rooms." Evidence suggests this is a real shared amenity rather than a stray checkbox.

Across 37 listings, none explicitly mention an on-site restaurant, cafe, or in-building dining. References to food are always external, such as being 'minutes from world-famous beaches, restaurants, shopping' or 'near Waikiki Beach, Shopping Centers and restaurants' and 'close to bus lines, restaurants, shopping.' Amenities are consistently listed as pool, sauna, BBQ, party/recreation rooms, lobby, and guest parking, with zero mentions of any restaurant facility (0 of 37 listings). No remarks suggest an internal dining venue, and there is no conflicting evidence. This strong, consistent silence supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that unmentioned features are still theoretically possible but unlikely.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none mention any rooftop-specific feature such as a “rooftop deck,” “roof terrace,” or “rooftop amenities.” Amenities are repeatedly described as “pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation/party room” and sometimes “sundeck” or “recreation deck,” but always without any “roof” reference. At least 20 of 37 listings enumerate amenities in detail, yet still omit rooftop access. No listing provides conflicting evidence like “rooftop lounge” or “roof deck.” This consistent silence, despite extensive amenity descriptions, strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that an unadvertised rooftop area is still theoretically possible.

Sauna is very well supported. About 18 of 20 MLS listings include SAUNA, and the public remarks repeatedly mention "sauna," "dry saunas," or "men’s and women’s saunas." This is clearly a building amenity.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none explicitly mention any kind of storage unit or locker. The remarks repeatedly highlight amenities such as 'pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room,' 'guest parking,' and 'car wash area,' as well as in-unit features like 'washer/dryer inside the unit' and 'ample storage' within cabinetry, but there is no reference to 'storage unit,' 'storage locker,' or 'extra storage.' With 0 of 37 listings mentioning dedicated storage and no contradictory claims that storage exists, the evidence does not support the declared value of True. It remains possible some storage exists but is simply not marketed.

I searched for surfboard-storage-related wording such as 'surfboard storage,' 'board storage,' or 'bike and surfboard storage.' No such amenity is mentioned in the public remarks.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, amenities are repeatedly detailed as 'pool, sauna, BBQ area, recreation room,' plus guest parking, car wash, meeting/party rooms, sundeck, and security. In 0 of 37 listings is a 'tennis court' or any tennis facility mentioned, even in longer remarks that carefully list many building features. Several units describe the property as having 'resort-style amenities' yet still omit tennis, which would typically be highlighted if present. No remarks suggest or imply tennis facilities, and there is no conflicting evidence. This consistent silence strongly supports the declared value of False, with minimal caveats.

Trash chute is supported mainly by the MLS checkbox data rather than the remarks. About 18 of 20 listings include TRACHU, but the public remarks rarely, if ever, spell out "trash chute" or "garbage chute." Still, the historical consistency is high enough to treat it as present.

Across 37 listings, none mention any form of valet service or valet parking. Instead, many explicitly reference self-parking features such as '1 assigned covered parking', '2 deeded parking stalls (tandem)', and '3 covered parking' as well as 'abundant guest parking' and 'guest stalls' (at least 15 of 37 listings). Several listings also highlight a 'gated parking garage' and 'secured parking' but never a staffed valet. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting valet exists. The consistent emphasis on self-parking and total silence on valet strongly support the declared value of False, with no notable caveats.

No specific verification method available for wall_fence. The declared value is retained as provided. Manual review recommended.

Across 37 listings, amenities are repeatedly described in detail as 'pool, sauna, BBQ area' or similar, with no mention of any 'whirlpool,' 'hot tub,' 'jacuzzi,' or 'spa.' I found 0 of 37 listings that reference any whirlpool-type feature, despite many saying 'resort-style amenities' or 'amenities galore with Pool, BBQ, Sauna, lounge, etc.' This consistent omission is meaningful because agents list other water amenities explicitly. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting a whirlpool exists. Thus, the evidence strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that amenities could change in the future without being reflected here.

Pool is strongly confirmed across the building. Dozens of current remarks mention it explicitly, including "pool area," "recently renovated pool," "new pool," and "swimming pool," and several listings pair it with sauna/BBQ as part of the resort-style amenity set. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and reads like a real shared building amenity, not a copy-paste anomaly.

Across 37 listings, many mention a “pool,” “swimming pool,” or “new pool,” but none explicitly describe it as a “heated pool” or “heated swimming pool.” For example, remarks state “pool, sauna and security,” “new pool, BBQs, sauna,” and “re-tiled pool, sauna, rec & meeting rooms,” yet never add “heated.” I counted 20+ listings referencing a pool, all silent on heating. No listing claims the pool is heated, and there is no contradictory evidence. Given this consistent omission in amenity-rich descriptions, the declared value of False is supported, though silence is not absolute proof.

I searched for explicit salt-water pool wording such as 'saltwater pool,' 'salt pool,' or 'saline pool.' The remarks mention a pool many times, but never identify it as salt water.

In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listings: many remarks say "in-unit laundry," "washer and dryer inside the unit," "washer/dryer in-unit," or "W/D in the unit." This is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be a stable building feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

Across 37 listings, 0 mention any kind of shared or 'community laundry' or 'laundry room.' Instead, at least 12 listings explicitly highlight in‑unit laundry, using phrases like 'in-unit washer and dryer,' 'washer/dryer in-unit,' 'There is also a washer/dryer inside the unit!' and 'stacked washer/dryer.' No listing references coin laundry, laundry on each floor, or common laundry facilities, and there is no conflicting evidence suggesting shared laundry exists. This consistent emphasis on in‑unit laundry strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that silence alone from other units cannot absolutely rule out any shared laundry area.

I looked for evidence of paid community laundry, including coin-op, card-operated, quarters, or laundry fee wording. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer or laundry in the unit, with no indication of paid common laundry.

I searched the public remarks for floor-by-floor laundry language such as 'laundry on every floor,' 'community laundry on each floor,' or similar wording. Nothing in the remarks indicates laundry facilities are available on every floor.

Strong evidence across listings that the building has parking: 20/20 MLS records list parking features and multiple remarks state 'covered parking', 'parking stall', and 'secured parking'. Examples: 'Two covered parking stalls add convenience' and 'one assigned covered parking stall'. Evidence is consistent across agents and listings.

Assigned/reserved parking is strongly confirmed across the listing set. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'assigned parking,' 'one assigned parking space,' and even 'deeded parking stalls,' which is consistent with the MLS data showing 20/20 listings marked assigned. This looks like a stable building feature, not a copy-paste anomaly.

Covered parking is well supported by both MLS history and remarks. At least several listings explicitly describe a 'gated parking garage,' 'covered parking,' or 'covered parking stall,' matching the strong historical record. Evidence is consistent and repeated by multiple agents.

The listings directly confirm deeded parking, including an explicit mention of 9 deeded parking stalls. This is clear and repeated evidence that parking is deeded in at least some units, and likely a recognized building feature.

Across 37 listings, none mention EV charging or related terms such as 'EV charging,' 'electric vehicle,' 'charging stations,' or 'Tesla.' Parking is frequently described in detail, e.g., 'secured parking with multiple guest stalls,' 'gated parking garage with visitor parking,' and specific stall counts like '3 PARKING STALLS: 1 tandem, 1 free standing,' yet no listing adds EV-specific features. Several note car wash areas and security in the garage but remain silent on EV infrastructure. With 0 of 37 listings referencing EV charging and no contradictory evidence, the absence is meaningful, so the declared value of False is well supported, though future upgrades could change this.

I looked for any explicit parking fee language, such as monthly parking rent, stall charge, or added cost for parking. The remarks consistently describe assigned, deeded, or included parking, but no standalone parking fee is stated.

Guest parking is clearly present in the building. Many remarks reference 'guest parking,' 'visitor parking,' 'guest stalls,' and even '9 guest parking,' which aligns with the MLS history showing 11/20 listings tagged for guest parking. The repeated mentions across many listings make this high confidence.

Secured-entry parking is strongly supported. Multiple remarks explicitly describe 'gated parking garage,' 'secured parking,' 'fob entry,' and 'secure entry & intercom,' confirming that parking access is controlled. This matches the historical MLS pattern and appears to be a real building characteristic.

Confidence 90%: 2/16 MLS listings mark TANDEM, and one remark clearly states '2 deeded parking stalls (tandem) ... in the secure parking structure'.

Across 37 listings, none mention valet parking or valet services. Instead, they consistently reference self-parking features such as '1 assigned covered parking', '2 deeded parking stalls (tandem)', 'gated parking garage with visitor parking', and '3 covered parking'. Several listings highlight 'guest parking' or 'abundant guest parking' but never describe any 'valet' or 'attended' component. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting valet service exists. The uniform emphasis on self-managed, assigned, and guest stalls strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that unadvertised services are always possible but unlikely here.

The remarks discuss assigned, deeded, secured, and guest parking, but never mention a parking waitlist. With no evidence of a queue system, this feature is marked false at low confidence.

Across 37 listings, several explicitly mention building access control but none describe a keyed or fob-restricted elevator. Security is referenced frequently: e.g., '24/7 security,' 'secured building with resident manager and security guard,' and 'fob entry' (2 listings note 'fob entry' for the building, not the elevator). One listing notes '3 elevators' and another 'large lobby and 3 elevators' without any hint of key or fob access. No remarks state 'keyed elevator,' 'fob elevator,' or similar, and there is no conflicting evidence. Given 0 of 37 listings mention restricted elevator access while many detail other security features, the declared value of False is well supported, though absence of mention is not absolute proof.

The remarks repeatedly describe secure access using fob/key-card style entry. That is strong evidence the building has a card/fob security system.

Security guard service is strongly supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Numerous listings mention '24/7 security,' '24-hour security,' 'on-site security,' and 'security guard,' indicating this is a real building-level feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listing versions.

I looked for explicit patrol-related language such as 'security patrol,' 'roving security,' or 'patrolled building.' The remarks mention security guards and 24/7 security, but not patrol service.

Across 37 listings, many mention general security but none explicitly reference video systems. Phrases include '24/7 security' (3 listings), '24-hour security' (2 listings), and multiple notes of a 'security guard' or 'on-site security' (at least 6 listings). Several also say 'secured building' or 'secured entries' and mention fob entry, but no listing states 'security cameras,' 'video surveillance,' 'CCTV,' or similar. There is no contradictory claim that cameras are absent, but the complete silence on video in all 37 listings weakens support. Given only generic security references, the declared value of True for security_video is not supported, though cameras may exist but are unadvertised.

Among 37 listings, only 1 explicitly mentions central AC: the penthouse remarks state 'An in-unit washer and dryer, central AC, and ample storage provide the best in home comforts,' clearly confirming central air in at least that unit. Another listing notes 'no need for A/C' due to cool breezes, but does not say AC is absent. The remaining 35 listings are silent on air conditioning, focusing instead on breezes and utilities. With one clear, uncontradicted reference and no statements denying central AC, the evidence moderately supports the declared value of True, though building-wide central AC is not definitively proven.

Across 37 listings, none explicitly mention 'split AC,' 'mini-split,' or 'ductless' systems. One listing notes 'central AC,' which typically conflicts with individual split systems, while another says 'no need for A/C' due to cool trade winds, implying reliance on natural ventilation. A separate listing states 'window AC installation is permitted,' suggesting the building is not already equipped with split systems. Overall, 0 of 37 listings provide evidence of split AC, and several imply alternative cooling methods. This strongly supports the declared value of False, though absence of mention is not absolute proof.

Multiple listings indicate window AC is available or permitted in the building, including explicit language that 'window AC installation is permitted.' Historical data was previously high confidence with at least two remarks referencing window air conditioners, so this appears to be a real building-level option rather than a copy-paste error. While many agents emphasize cool breezes or no need for A/C, the explicit window-AC remark supports keeping this feature enabled.

All current MLS listings support concrete construction for this building, with 20 out of 20 entries listing construction_materials=CONCRE. Historical data was also high confidence, and the public remarks contain no evidence suggesting any change away from concrete construction.

Across all 37 listings, none of the remarks explicitly mention double-wall construction or similar terms. I searched for phrases like 'double wall,' 'double-wall construction,' and 'two walls' but found no references. The remarks focus on views, amenities, security, utilities, and renovations, with quotes such as 'well managed building,' 'resort-style amenities,' and 'cool and breezy year-round,' but nothing about wall construction. With 0 of 37 listings mentioning this feature and no indirect hints, the evidence does not support the declared value of True. It remains possible the building has double walls, but the marketing materials are silent on it.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none of the remarks mention “hollow tile” or “hollow tile construction.” The descriptions focus on views, amenities, security, utilities, and renovations, with quotes like “well managed building,” “resort-style amenities,” and “Building is 100% Hurricane Insured,” but never construction type. With 0 of 37 listings referencing hollow tile, there is no explicit evidence contradicting the declared value of False. The silence across a large sample suggests hollow tile is not a marketed or defining feature here. I therefore judge the declared value of False as supported, with the caveat that construction details might exist outside these remarks.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none explicitly mention 'masonry,' 'stucco,' or phrases like 'masonry and stucco' when describing the building’s construction. The remarks focus on views, amenities, security, and utilities, with quotes such as 'well-managed building,' 'resort-style amenities,' and 'secured building' but never reference exterior materials. With 0 of 37 listings addressing masonry or stucco, there is no direct evidence contradicting the declared value of False. The silence across so many units suggests these materials are not a notable feature, so I judge the False value as supported, while noting the absence of explicit structural detail as a caveat.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none mention 'steel frame' or 'steel frame construction.' The remarks focus on views, amenities, security, utilities, and management, with quotes like 'well managed building,' 'resort-style amenities,' and 'building is 100% Hurricane Insured,' but never reference structural materials. I counted 0 of 37 listings that even hint at steel framing. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting a steel frame. Given this complete silence on steel construction, the declared value of False is supported, though the absence of mention is indirect rather than a technical confirmation.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none explicitly mention a “concrete slab,” “solid concrete foundation,” or any slab-style construction detail. The remarks focus on views, amenities, security, utilities, and renovations, with quotes like “well-managed building,” “secured building,” and “resort-style amenities,” but never structural descriptions. With 0 of 37 listings referencing slab construction, the corpus is effectively silent on this feature. There is no contradictory evidence suggesting a slab either. This silence moderately supports the declared value of False, though absence of mention is not definitive proof.

No analysis available

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none explicitly mention 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction.' Instead, remarks consistently emphasize a high-rise character: repeated references to 'high-floor condo,' '41st floor,' 'Penthouse suite,' and '33rd floor' (at least 8 listings) strongly imply a concrete/steel high-rise rather than wood framing. No listing (0 of 37) provides contrary evidence such as 'wood frame building' or similar wording. The complete silence on wood framing, combined with clear high-rise cues, supports the declared value of False, though the absence of direct structural specs leaves a small margin of uncertainty.

Across 37 listings, none explicitly mention 'above ground construction' or similar terms. However, 15 of 37 listings clearly describe high-floor or penthouse units with extensive views, e.g., 'Experience Waikiki like never before from the 41st floor' and 'Penthouse suite of 2121 Ala Wai.' Multiple remarks reference a 'secured garage' and 'parking structure' with covered parking on lower levels, implying the residential tower rises above grade. No listing suggests any subterranean or partially buried residential construction. While the corpus is silent on materials, the consistent high-rise context strongly supports the declared value of False, with no contradictory evidence found.

Across 37 listings, none mention brick construction or a brick exterior. The remarks focus on views, amenities, security, and management, with quotes like 'well managed building,' 'resort-style amenities,' and 'secured building with resident manager,' but never reference 'brick exterior' or 'brick construction.' Zero of 37 listings provide explicit evidence of brick, and there is no conflicting description such as 'classic brick facade.' This consistent silence, given the otherwise detailed building descriptions, supports the declared value of False, though it remains possible the structure uses some brick not highlighted in marketing.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none of the remarks mention 'single wall construction,' 'single wall,' or similar phrases. Instead, they emphasize modern or updated interiors, e.g., 'completely renovated interior,' 'Beautifully Renovated in 2021 with Modern Upgrades,' and 'smooth ceilings and fresh white paint,' which are more typical of double-wall or concrete high-rise construction. Zero of 37 listings provide explicit evidence of single-wall construction, and there is no contradictory statement suggesting it. Given this consistent silence and the building’s high-rise character, the declared value of False is well supported, though absence of explicit construction details leaves a small degree of uncertainty.

The clearest rental-policy evidence is the repeated 30-day minimum language, which indicates STRs are not allowed. No public remarks contradict this, so the building is treated as not permitting short-term rentals.

I searched for hotel pool, hotel-managed, branded rental program, and similar language, but found none. Because STR is not allowed based on the remarks, a hotel rental pool would also not apply here.

I looked for language indicating a required rental program or mandatory hotel pool participation, but found nothing. The remarks instead discuss normal ownership and long-term occupancy/rental use, so mandatory pooling is not supported.

Among 37 listings, at least 3 explicitly state fee simple tenure. One listing says, 'fee simple 2 bedroom, 1 bath condo,' another notes a 'Desirable Fee Simple 2 bedroom end unit,' and a third mentions 'spacious, fee simple 2 bedroom' in Waikiki. No listings mention leasehold, ground lease, or any conflicting tenure terms. The majority of other remarks are silent on land tenure, focusing on views, amenities, and VA loan assumptions. With 3 of 37 clearly fee simple and no contrary evidence, the declared value of True is strongly supported, though some units’ tenure remains unspecified.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, at least 2 explicitly state 'Desirable Fee Simple 2 bedroom' or 'fee simple 2 bedroom, 1 bath condo,' confirming fee-simple units. However, one listing mentions 'Desirable Fee Simple 2 bedroom end unit,' which strongly implies that non-fee (i.e., leasehold) units also exist in the building, otherwise specifying 'fee simple' would be unnecessary. No remarks explicitly say 'leasehold,' 'LH,' or give lease expiry dates, and most listings are silent on tenure. With 2 of 37 clearly FS and suggestive wording that LH units may exist, I judge the declared value False as unsupported, with the caveat that no listing directly labels a unit as leasehold.

I searched the remarks for language like lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, renewal, and extension dates, but found nothing. Since no specific expiration year is stated, the lease expiry remains unknown.

The public remarks repeatedly advertise VA loan assumption/financing, which is strong evidence that VA financing is accepted or at least used in marketing for this building. This is consistent across many listings and is more than enough to mark the feature true.

The remarks directly support that the building is fully insured, with explicit language confirming full insurance coverage. This is strong evidence and aligns with the prior analysis.

Across 37 listings for 2121 Ala Wai, none explicitly mention fire sprinklers or a sprinkler system. Remarks repeatedly highlight safety and building features such as “24/7 security,” “secured building with resident manager and security guard,” “gated parking garage,” and “well managed, fully insured building,” but never reference “fire sprinklers” or “fire suppression.” With 0 of 37 listings mentioning sprinklers, and no contradictory claims like “equipped with fire sprinklers,” the corpus neither proves nor disproves their existence. However, this strong, consistent silence supports treating the declared value of False as plausible, with the caveat that absence of mention is not definitive proof.

I searched the public remarks for direct fire/life safety compliance wording, including FLSE passed, fire safety certified, and passed fire inspection, but found nothing. Because this feature is only determined from public remarks, it remains unknown.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Multiple listings explicitly reference ocean views or Waikiki Beach from either the walkway or interior (quotes include: "kitchen and entry enjoy views of the ocean", "Partial Ocean view from kitchen window", "OCEAN & DIAMOND HEAD VIEWS"). Evidence appears across several agents and listing remarks, indicating some units in the building offer ocean views.

Mountain views are strongly supported across many listings and appear to be a building-level feature, not a one-off unit trait. Multiple remarks explicitly say "mauka views," "Ko'olau mountains," "mountain views," and "panoramic views" from several different listings, which is consistent with the high MLS frequency.

Across 37 listings, Diamond Head views are explicitly mentioned in at least 8 listings. Examples include: “Breathtaking OCEAN & DIAMOND HEAD VIEWS afforded by this Diamond Head-end unit,” “peekaboo Diamond Head view,” “Spectacular ... and peekaboo Diamond Head View!,” “gorgeous panoramic views of the Ala Wai canal, golf course, Diamond Head,” and “spectacular views of ... Diamond Head.” No listing states that Diamond Head cannot be seen; others are simply silent, focusing on mountains, canal, or city. The repeated explicit mentions directly contradict the declared value of false, so it is unsupported, with no meaningful conflicting evidence.

City views are well documented for this building and show up in both MLS view data and remarks. Listings mention "city lights," "city skyline," "sparkling city," and "Honolulu city lights," across multiple agents, indicating this is a common building feature rather than copy-paste noise.

Listings frequently mention ocean, Waikiki Beach, and walkway ocean sightings, but do not use the specific keywords 'coastline', 'shoreline', or 'coastal view'. While ocean views are confirmed, explicit coastline/shoreline phrasing is absent in the current remarks, so coastline view is not asserted.

Across 37 listings, views are consistently described as mountains, city, ocean, canal, golf course, and Diamond Head, with quotes like “panoramic mountain views…Ala Wai Canal, golf course, and city lights” and “breathtaking panoramic views of the Ala Wai canal, golf course, Diamond Head, mountains.” None of the 37 listings mention a “garden view,” “courtyard view,” or similar landscaped outlook. Several emphasize “city lights” and “sparkling city,” reinforcing an urban, not garden, setting. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting any unit has a garden view, so the declared value of false is well supported, with no noted caveats.

Golf course views are commonly noted: 13 of 20 MLS listings historically list golf-course views and many remarks say "Ala Wai Golf Course" or "golf course views." Multiple independent listings reference the golf course, supporting inclusion as a building-level offering.

The building clearly offers marina/canal-type views, with many listings describing "Ala Wai Canal," "canal views," and similar wording across multiple agents. The repeated references to canal, harbor, and waterfront outlooks support this as a genuine and widely marketed feature rather than a data-entry error.

Multiple listings mention sunrise specifically, including “Corner Unit… Enjoy spectacular panoramic views of… Diamond Head, Sunrise,” “breathtaking mountain, golf course, and sunrise views,” and “Exciting… sightings… adorned by spectacular sunrises.” These statements show that at least some orientations in the building capture morning/eastern exposure and sunrise vistas. This is consistent across different high-floor units and agents.

Sunset-oriented views are supported, but the evidence is lighter than for mountain or city views. A few listings reference "sunset practice," "Friday night fireworks," and evening-facing exposure, suggesting some units can enjoy sunset/evening views, though it is not consistently promoted across the building.

Across 37 listings, views are consistently described as mountains, Ala Wai Canal, golf course, city, Diamond Head, ocean, and fireworks, with quotes like “panoramic views of the Ala Wai canal, golf course, Diamond Head, mountains” and “breathtaking OCEAN & DIAMOND HEAD VIEWS.” None of the 37 listings mention a cemetery view or anything like “overlooks cemetery.” There is no conflicting evidence suggesting any unit faces a cemetery. This repeated emphasis on other view types, combined with total silence about cemeteries, strongly supports the declared value of false, with no clear caveats.

There are multiple direct references to viewing Friday night fireworks from units or from the building. This is strong, repeated evidence that fireworks views are available.

No analysis available

Geographic designation determined by building address. This is not derived from MLS listing data.

In the 37-listing corpus, 4 listings explicitly address pets. One states, 'Emotional support animals are allowed by board approval,' another says, 'NO Pets allowed except service and emotional support animals,' and two more repeat 'No pets allowed except for service & emotional support animals' or simply 'No pets allowed.' No listings mention dogs, cats, or general pet-friendliness. Thus, 4 of 37 listings clearly indicate a no-pet policy with limited exceptions for service/ESA animals, and none contradict this. This strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that assistance animals are permitted by law and board approval.

This feature is strongly supported. Multiple current listings explicitly mention a resident manager on-site, including phrases such as "on-site resident manager," "resident manager," and "secured building with resident manager." The evidence is consistent across many remarks and appears to reflect a real building-level amenity rather than a copy-paste error.

Across 37 listings, none explicitly mention condotel characteristics such as a 'hotel rental pool,' 'hotel front desk,' 'hotel program,' or being 'managed by hotel,' nor do they use the words 'condotel' or 'condo-hotel.' Instead, remarks repeatedly describe it as a 'well managed condo' or 'well-managed building' with standard residential amenities, 30-day minimum rentals, and VA loan assumptions, all typical of non-hotel condos. At least 2 listings note '30 day minimum rental,' which contradicts nightly hotel-style use. With 0 of 37 listings indicating hotel operations and no conflicting evidence, the declared value of False is well supported, though absence of mention is not absolute proof.

No specific verification method available for coop. The declared value is retained as provided. Manual review recommended.