1717 Ala Wai

Across 48 listings for 1717 Ala Wai, none of the remarks explicitly mention the building’s construction date or phrases like 'built in' or 'constructed in.' The comments instead focus on upgrades and age-related work, e.g., 'stands out among older condos' and 'maintenance upgrades consistent with the age of the building,' but provide no specific year. Because 0 of 48 listings state a year built, there is no direct support or contradiction for 1970. The absence of any explicit year reference leaves the declared 1970 date unverified, so it remains plausible but unconfirmed.

Among 48 listings, 2 explicitly reference the 31st floor. One penthouse listing states it is on the '31st floor' and another describes a 'Fantastic Corner Penthouse! This top-floor residence' without giving a number. Together, these indicate that the 31st floor is the top residential level. No listing mentions any higher floor such as '32nd floor' or describes the building as having more than 31 stories, and no remarks contradict this. While most listings are silent on total floors, the explicit penthouse-on-31st-floor evidence strongly supports the declared value of 31, with only minor caveats about possible non-residential roof/mechanical levels.

Across 48 listings for 1717 Ala Wai, none of the remarks explicitly state the total number of units in the building. I searched for phrases like '109-unit building', 'one of 109 units', or similar, but found no such references; remarks focus instead on amenities, upgrades, insurance, and assessments (e.g., 'heated salt water pool', '100% hurricane insurance', 'special assessment until 2028'). Because 0 of 48 listings mention any building unit count, there is no direct support or contradiction for the declared value of 283 units. Thus, the accuracy of 283 remains unverified and must be treated as uncertain.

I searched for explicit ownership ratios and qualitative descriptions such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." The remarks do not provide a direct occupancy percentage or a clear ownership composition update. Because the current value exists and nothing in the remarks confirms or denies it, I kept 56.0 with low confidence.

I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts such as "3 elevators" or "multiple elevators." The listings consistently reference elevator modernization/upgrades, which supports that elevators exist and have been improved, but they do not confirm a count. With a current value already provided, I kept 3 and treated it as low confidence because no remark directly contradicts it.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Across 48 listings, several explicitly detail what HOA fees include, but none mention central air conditioning being covered. One listing states, 'HOA fees cover hot and cold water, internet, and a full digital cable package,' with no reference to AC. Multiple units highlight individual systems like 'Mitsubishi split AC system' or 'NEW BREAKER BOX AND AC WINDOW UNIT INSTALLED,' implying owner-installed, unit-specific cooling rather than a central building system included in fees. No remarks say 'central AC included' or similar. With 0 of 48 listings indicating AC in the maintenance fee and several implying self-contained AC, the evidence strongly supports the declared value of False, though absence of a full HOA breakdown in every listing leaves a small margin of uncertainty.

Cable inclusion is very well supported across the building. Multiple remarks explicitly mention cable service, including "Spectrum cable/internet" and a "full digital cable package that includes Showtime," which looks like consistent building-level reporting rather than a one-off copy-paste note.

Common-area electricity is supported mainly by the MLS checkbox pattern rather than the public remarks. Because 15 of 20 recent listings show OTCOEX, it is likely included, but the listing text itself does not provide direct confirmation.

Across 48 listings, none mention 'coop taxes included,' 'cooperative taxes,' or any similar phrase. Instead, multiple remarks explicitly describe the property as a 'condo' or 'condominium,' e.g., 'This tastefully upgraded 2 bed condo' and 'two-full-bath condominium,' indicating a condominium, not a cooperative. Several listings detail what HOA fees cover, such as 'HOA fees cover hot and cold water, internet, and a full digital cable package,' but none add co-op tax coverage. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting co-op status or co-op tax inclusion. Given this consistent silence and condo language in all units, the declared value of False for fee_inc_coop_taxes is well supported, with the caveat that absence of mention is not absolute proof.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly state that electricity is included in the maintenance fee. One listing details that 'HOA fees cover hot and cold water, internet, and a full digital cable package' but does not mention power, which strongly implies electricity is separate. Several listings mention only the total maintenance fee or special assessment amounts without itemizing utilities, and no remarks say 'electricity included' or similar. With 0 of 48 listings supporting inclusion and no contradictory claims, the evidence supports the declared value of False, though absence of a full HOA breakdown leaves a small margin of uncertainty.

Across 48 listings, only 1 explicitly details what HOA fees include: it states, 'The HOA fees cover hot and cold water, internet, and a full digital cable package' and later mentions 'gas grills' as an amenity, not as a utility. No listing says 'gas included' or that gas is part of the maintenance fee. The remaining 47 listings are silent on gas in fees, despite often listing covered items like insurance or internet. There is no contradictory evidence suggesting gas is included. This strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that silence is not absolute proof.

Hot water inclusion is strongly supported both by MLS data and by public remarks. At least one listing explicitly states "MF includes hot/cold water," and the repeated MLS pattern suggests this is a building-level amenity, not an agent mistake.

Internet inclusion is directly confirmed in the remarks and reinforced by the MLS pattern. Multiple listings reference "Spectrum cable/internet" or state that HOA fees include internet, making this a reliable building-level feature. The consistency across listings suggests this is not just copied boilerplate.

Across 48 listings, none mention a marina, boat slips, or marina access being included in the HOA or maintenance fees. Remarks repeatedly highlight what is covered, such as 'HOA fees cover hot and cold water, internet, and a full digital cable package' and emphasize amenities like 'heated salt water pool, jacuzzi, fitness room, sauna' and 'BBQ area, recreation deck' but never reference any marina-related benefit. Zero of 48 listings contradict this by suggesting marina inclusion. This consistent silence, despite detailed fee and amenity descriptions, strongly supports the declared value of False, with no evident caveats.

Sewer inclusion is strongly supported across the building. Remarks explicitly say the maintenance fee includes sewer, and several listings also mention sewer pipe replacement or sewer piping work, reinforcing the building-level nature of the feature.

Water inclusion is one of the strongest-supported features in the building. The remarks directly confirm it, including "MF includes hot/cold water," and the MLS data shows water included in 18 of 20 listings.

BBQ facilities are very clearly supported by the public remarks. Dozens of listings reference a shared 'BBQ area,' 'BBQ grills,' or 'gas grills,' showing consistent, repeated confirmation across many listings and agents.

In the remarks, at least 1 of 48 listings explicitly mentions bike-related storage: the final listing states the building has 'surfboard & bicycle storage, etc.' This is a clear, direct reference to dedicated bicycle storage facilities. No listings contradict this by saying bike storage is absent; others are simply silent on the feature while mentioning general 'storage locker' or 'storage unit' options. Because there is explicit evidence in 1 of 48 listings and no conflicting statements, the declared value of False is refuted. The building does appear to offer bike storage, though details on capacity and access are not provided.

Across 48 listings, none mention any marina, slip, or 'boat dock' access, despite frequent references to water features and nearby boating areas. Remarks repeatedly highlight views of the 'Ala Wai Canal' and proximity to 'Waikiki Yacht Club' and 'marina view' but never state that residents can dock boats on-site. Amenities are consistently listed as 'pool, jacuzzi, sauna, BBQ, fitness room, recreation deck' and similar, with 0 of 48 units adding docks or moorings. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting boat facilities. This strong, consistent omission supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that off-site docks nearby are common in this area.

Car wash facilities appear to be a real shared amenity in this building. While not every listing mentions it, the public remarks do explicitly call out a 'designated car wash space' and some amenity lists include 'car wash.' The MLS checkbox frequency (10/20) supports this as a legitimate building feature.

Across 48 listings, amenities are repeatedly detailed but none mention a clubhouse or club house. Common phrases include “recreation deck which includes a heated salt water pool, jacuzzi and BBQ area,” “resort-style amenities including a pool, jacuzzi, sauna, BBQ area, gym,” and “pool, spa, barbeque area, gym, library, security personnel,” but never “clubhouse,” “club house,” or “community center.” At least 20+ listings enumerate amenities in depth, yet omit any club facility. No listing provides conflicting evidence. This consistent silence strongly supports the declared value of False, though it remains possible a small informal room exists but is not marketed.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly mention a concierge or front desk service. Instead, many listings emphasize security without concierge, using phrases like 'secured entry with on-site security,' '24-hour security,' 'security personnel at the front door,' and 'key fob entry and security at the front lobby' (appearing in at least 8 of 48 listings). One listing notes a 'reception area and on-site security,' but does not describe staffed concierge services such as package handling or resident assistance. No remarks reference a 'concierge' or 'front desk service.' This consistent pattern supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that a basic reception/security desk might exist but not function as a true concierge.

Across 48 listings, amenities are described in detail—'heated salt water pool, hot tub, BBQ area and exercise room,' 'fitness room, sauna,' 'recreation deck with barbecue areas,' and similar phrases appear repeatedly. None of the 48 listings mention a 'dog park,' 'dog run,' 'pet area,' or any dedicated dog exercise space. Pets are referenced only in terms of policy, e.g., 'Cat and service dog friendly' and 'Dogs must be registered service/support animals,' but never alongside a physical pet facility. There is no conflicting evidence. This consistent silence on a commonly marketed feature supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that an unadvertised informal area could exist but is unlikely.

Across 48 listings, several explicitly reference staffed security or front presence but none mention a traditional doorman. At least 6 listings note '24-hour security' or '24/7 on-site security' and others mention 'security personnel' or 'security at the front door' and 'security at the front lobby.' One listing says 'secured entry with on-site security' and another 'secured high-rise building with on-site security and a resident manager.' No listing uses the terms 'doorman' or 'door attendant,' and there is no conflicting evidence. This strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that robust security staff might function similarly in practice.

Exercise/fitness amenities are consistently confirmed across many listings for 1717 Ala Wai. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'exercise room,' 'fitness room,' 'fitness center,' and 'gym,' which strongly indicates this is a shared building amenity rather than a one-off unit feature.

Across 48 listings, amenities are described in detail—'pool, hot tub, sauna, BBQ area, recreation deck,' 'gym, library, security,' and 'car wash'—but there are zero mentions of any limo, limousine, or car service. Many units repeat long amenity lists (at least 20+ listings) including guest parking, storage, security, and even niche items like 'book nook' and 'surfboard & bicycle storage,' yet none add limo-related services. No listing suggests valet, chauffeur, or shuttle service, and there is no conflicting evidence. This consistent silence, despite exhaustive amenity descriptions, strongly supports the declared value of false, with minimal caveats that an unadvertised service could exist but is unlikely.

There is no meaningful public-remarks evidence for a meeting room. The only MLS signal is very low at 1/20, and the listings instead consistently describe pool, sauna, BBQ, gym, and recreation deck amenities. This looks like an MLS checkbox/copy-paste issue rather than a verified building feature.

The evidence is overwhelming: dozens of current remarks mention a shared outdoor amenity area, usually as a "recreation deck" or "amenities deck," often paired with pool, BBQ, spa, and picnic tables. Several listings explicitly note deck upgrades/renovations, which aligns with the historical MLS amenity data showing PATDEC/COVPAT in most listings. This appears to be a consistent building-wide feature rather than copy-paste noise.

There is no evidence in the current public remarks that 1717 Ala Wai has a dedicated jogging or walking path. Across the listings, agents repeatedly describe pools, BBQ areas, saunas, and fitness rooms, but none mention a path/trail amenity, suggesting the MLS path_jogging value is likely incorrect.

Across 48 listings, amenities are described in detail—'recreation deck which includes a heated salt water pool, jacuzzi and BBQ area,' plus repeated mentions of 'pool, hot tub, sauna, BBQ area, fitness room' and similar. None of the 48 listings mention a 'playground,' 'tot lot,' or 'children's play area,' even when highlighting family-suitable aspects like 'great for families' or 'safe floor for children and pets.' There is no conflicting evidence suggesting a playground exists. This consistent silence, despite exhaustive amenity lists, strongly supports the declared value of False, though it remains possible a very small or informal play space goes unmentioned.

Across 48 listings, none mention a 'private yard,' 'fenced yard,' or similar terms; instead, outdoor space is consistently described as 'lanai,' 'wraparound lanai,' or 'recreation deck' (e.g., '100 sq ft open lanai,' 'spacious lanai provides captivating, panoramic ocean, city, canal, and mountain views'). Amenities repeatedly include pool, hot tub, sauna, BBQ, and deck, but never any yard or ground-level private outdoor area. With 0 of 48 listings referencing a yard and no contradictory evidence, the corpus strongly supports the declared value of False, though silence cannot absolutely rule out a rare, unmentioned yard configuration.

Across 48 listings, amenities are described in detail—'heated salt water pool, jacuzzi and BBQ area,' 'fitness room, sauna,' 'library,' 'book nook,' and 'recreation deck'—but none mention any form of 'putting green,' 'golf putting green,' or similar facility. I counted 0 of 48 listings referencing a putting green, despite many repeating long amenity lists. No listing hints at golf-related practice areas, and there is no contradictory evidence suggesting one exists. This consistent silence, given otherwise exhaustive amenity descriptions, strongly supports the declared value of False, with minimal caveats.

The building has a shared recreation area, most often described as a 'recreation deck.' Many listings mention that the deck was renovated or refreshed, sometimes with the pool and BBQ area as part of the same amenity package. The MLS data shows RECARE in 9/20 listings, matching the repeated public remarks.

Evidence for an indoor rec room is weak: CURRENT MLS flagged few units historically (4/20) but public remarks overwhelmingly describe a 'recreation deck' and pool area rather than an indoor 'recreation room' or game room. No consistent, explicit mentions of an indoor rec/multi-purpose room across the remarks, suggesting the indoor rec room is not a reliably advertised building amenity.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly mention an on-site or in-building restaurant, café, or dining facility. References to food are always external, such as being 'close to parks, shopping, restaurants' or 'walking distance from ... restaurants, nightlife' and 'close to world famous beaches, shopping, restaurants.' At least 15 listings use this kind of proximity language, but zero describe amenities like 'on-site restaurant' or 'in-building café.' No remarks contradict this by implying internal dining services. The consistent silence on an amenity that is typically highlighted if present strongly supports the declared value of False, though it remains possible but unlikely that a very small food service exists but is not marketed.

Across 48 listings, none mention any rooftop-related features such as a 'rooftop deck,' 'roof terrace,' or 'rooftop amenities.' Instead, amenities are consistently described as being on a 'recreation deck' with 'heated salt water pool, jacuzzi and BBQ area' or similar wording (appearing in at least 20 of 48 listings). Several listings repeat this same amenity set without adding any rooftop access. No remarks hint at roof-level common areas or views specifically from a rooftop. This uniform, detailed amenity description, combined with total silence on rooftop features, supports the declared value of False, though absence of mention is not absolute proof.

Sauna is one of the most consistently confirmed amenities in the building. The remarks frequently list 'sauna,' sometimes as 'dry sauna' or 'sauna room,' and the MLS data is unanimous at 20/20. This is very high-confidence shared amenity evidence.

Storage is strongly supported across the remarks and MLS data for 1717 Ala Wai. Well over a dozen current listings mention it explicitly, including "storage locker," "additional storage space," "separate storage," "on-site storage," and "surfboard storage," often tied to the parking area or garage. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears to reflect a real building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.

This feature is directly confirmed in the public remarks. Multiple listings explicitly mention surfboard storage, including combined surfboard and bicycle storage, so the building has this amenity.

There is no supporting evidence in the current remarks for tennis courts. With only 1/20 current MLS listings checking the field and no descriptive mention from agents, this feature appears unsupported in the public listing text.

Public remarks are silent on any trash chute system, despite a moderate MLS checkbox signal. Because the remarks repeatedly detail many other amenities but never mention a chute, this likely reflects an MLS data inconsistency rather than a verified building feature. With no supporting language in the listings, it should be treated as absent for now.

Across 48 listings, none mention any form of valet or valet parking. Instead, parking is consistently described as self-parking with phrases like '1 covered assigned parking stall,' 'one uncovered parking space,' and 'basement parking garage' (appearing in at least 15 of 48 listings). Amenities are repeatedly listed in detail—'pool, hot tub, sauna, BBQ area, fitness room, 24-hour security, guest parking'—yet valet is never included. No listing contains the word 'valet' or suggests staffed parking services. This uniform silence, despite extensive amenity descriptions, strongly supports the declared value of False, with no contradictory evidence found.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly mention any kind of perimeter 'wall' or 'fence' around the property. The remarks focus on views, amenities, and building upgrades, with repeated phrases like 'secured entry with on-site security,' 'key fob entry,' and 'secure, well-maintained high-rise,' but never 'gated,' 'fenced,' or 'walled.' At least 10 listings describe security features (e.g., 'secured building with great amenities'), yet still omit any wall/fence reference. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting a perimeter fence. This consistent silence supports the declared value of False, though absence of mention is not absolute proof.

Whirlpool/hot tub/spa amenities are strongly supported. The remarks repeatedly use terms like 'jacuzzi,' 'hot tub,' 'spa,' and 'whirlpool tub,' often in the same amenity list as the pool and sauna. This is backed by the MLS pattern of 15/20 listings showing WHIRLP.

The evidence for a building pool is overwhelming. Multiple listings across different agents describe a pool, including phrases like 'pool,' 'swimming pool,' 'heated saltwater pool,' and 'recreation deck with pool,' and the current MLS data shows pool-related amenities in 20/20 listings. This appears to be consistent building-level amenity information rather than a copy-paste error.

There is strong, repeated confirmation that the building pool is heated. Numerous listings explicitly say 'heated saltwater pool,' 'heated pool,' or 'heated salt-water pool,' and the historical MLS data also shows heated-pool amenities in 11 of 20 listings. The consistency across multiple remarks suggests this is a real building feature, not a checkbox artifact.

This feature is directly confirmed by several listings. The remarks repeatedly say 'heated saltwater pool' or 'salt water pool,' which clearly establishes that the pool is salt water.

Strong, consistent evidence confirms in-unit laundry for this building. Dozens of remarks explicitly state washer/dryer in unit or full-size in-unit W/D, and this aligns with the current MLS data showing 20/20 listings include washer/dryer. The repetition across multiple agents and listings suggests this is a building-wide feature, not a one-off copy-paste error.

Across 48 listings, laundry is consistently described as being inside each unit, not shared. Multiple remarks explicitly state 'Washer and dryer in-unit' or 'Full-size, side-by-side washer/dryer' and similar phrases like 'full-size in-unit W/D' and 'washer and dryer in the unit' (at least 10+ listings). No listing mentions 'community laundry,' 'shared laundry,' a 'laundry room,' or any coin-operated/common laundry facilities. There is no contradictory evidence suggesting shared laundry. Given the repeated in-unit laundry references and total silence on common laundry, the declared value of True for community_laundry is not supported, though the building may coincidentally also have such facilities unadvertised.

I looked for public references to coin laundry, paid laundry, laundry fees, or card-operated machines and found none. Multiple listings instead describe in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence supporting paid community laundry.

I searched the public remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' and similar wording, but found nothing. The remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer in several listings, which does not confirm community laundry facilities on every floor.

Strong evidence that the building has parking: all 20 current MLS listings include parking features and the remarks repeatedly mention '8 guest parking stalls', 'on-site storage', 'covered parking', and 'one parking'. Multiple agents across many listings describe both guest and resident parking, indicating building-level parking rather than isolated unit-level notes.

Strong building-level evidence supports assigned parking. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'assigned parking stall,' 'designated parking space,' 'covered assigned stall,' and 'one assigned covered corner parking stall,' across many different remarks. The consistency across agents suggests this is a real building feature, not just copy-paste noise.

Covered parking is strongly supported at the building level. Many listings explicitly reference 'covered parking,' 'covered assigned parking stall,' 'parking garage,' and 'basement parking garage,' with multiple independent remarks confirming it. The evidence is consistent and detailed, so this should be treated as a true shared feature.

I looked for explicit language like deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, or parking stall included. The listings only describe assigned/covered parking and guest stalls, so deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly mention EV charging, EV stations, or similar terms. Parking is repeatedly described only as '1 covered assigned parking stall,' 'basement parking garage,' or with features like 'car wash' and 'designated car wash space,' but never 'EV charging' or 'charging stations.' At least 10 listings detail amenities extensively—'heated salt water pool, whirlpool, BBQ and fitness center,' 'surfboard & bicycle storage'—yet still omit any EV-related feature. There is no contradictory evidence suggesting EV chargers exist. Given this consistent silence, the declared value of False is well supported, though absence of mention is not absolute proof.

I searched for any reference to parking cost, monthly parking fees, or rental charges for stalls. The remarks discuss parking availability and assignment, but do not mention any parking fee.

Guest parking is very well supported by current remarks and prior MLS data. Numerous listings mention '8 guest parking stalls,' 'guest parking,' and 'ample guest parking,' which appears repeatedly across agents and listing descriptions. This is strong building-level evidence that visitor parking is available.

Across the 48 listings, at least 6 explicitly mention secure building or parking access. Two listings state 'secure parking' as an amenity, while others note 'secure entry and elevator access with 24/7 on site security,' 'secured entry with on-site security,' and 'key fob entry and security at the front door.' One listing calls it a 'secured high-rise building' and another a 'secured building' with cameras. No listings contradict or suggest open, unsecured parking. Although not every remark ties security directly to the garage, repeated references to secure parking and controlled entry strongly refute the declared value of False, with only minor caveats about exact access mechanisms.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly mention tandem or back-to-back parking. Instead, many listings clearly describe standard single stalls, e.g., '1 covered, assigned parking stall very, very close to the building entry' and '2bed/2bath/1covered parking' and 'one covered assigned parking stall and individual storage space.' At least 15 listings reference parking in this singular, non-tandem way, and several add details like proximity to storage, implying individual spaces. No remarks suggest shared or tandem configurations, and there is no conflicting evidence. This consistent silence on tandem parking, combined with repeated emphasis on single assigned stalls, supports the declared value of False, though it cannot absolutely rule out rare tandem arrangements for a few units.

Across 48 listings, none mention any form of valet parking or valet service. Parking is consistently described as self-park, e.g., 'one covered, assigned parking stall,' '1 covered parking and 1 storage locker,' and 'one uncovered parking space and a covered storage area.' Several listings highlight other services like 'on-site security,' 'security personnel at the front door,' and 'reception area,' but never attendants for cars. No listing suggests attended or valet-style parking, and there is no conflicting evidence. This strong, repeated silence on valet parking supports the declared value of False, though it remains possible but unlikely that an unadvertised valet option exists.

I looked for parking waitlist language such as waiting list, join the list, or parking queue. Nothing in the public remarks suggests the building uses a parking waitlist system.

Across 48 listings, several explicitly describe building security but only 3 mention elevator access details. One listing notes 'secure entry and elevator access with 24/7 on site security,' another says 'secure entry and elevator access with 24/7 on-site security,' and a third references 'secure entry and elevator access with 24/7 on site security' or similar phrasing, but none specify a 'keyed elevator,' 'key fob elevator,' or restricted floor access. Multiple listings mention 'key fob entry' or 'secured building' at the lobby level only. No remarks contradict this by describing keyed elevator controls. Given the consistent silence on keyed elevator mechanisms and only generic security language, the evidence supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that elevator access could still be controlled in ways not advertised.

Public remarks repeatedly confirm electronic access control. References to key fob entry, keyless entry, and secured entry strongly support card/fob access security.

Security guard service is strongly supported across the building’s listings. Well over a dozen current remarks explicitly mention 24/7 or on-site security, security personnel, or secure entry, which is consistent with the historical MLS amenity checkbox data. The evidence appears repeated across multiple agents and listings rather than a one-off copy-paste error.

The remarks consistently show an active security presence in the building. While the exact phrase 'security patrol' is not used often, the repeated references to 24/7 on-site security and security personnel are strong evidence of patrol/service-like coverage.

Evidence for video or camera-based security is strong. At least 2 of 48 listings explicitly mention cameras, e.g., one states the 'secured building features security cameras throughout,' and another notes 'secured entry with on-site security.' Several more reference controlled access like 'secure entry and elevator access with 24/7 on site security,' 'key fob entry,' and 'security at the front door,' which typically rely on video/CCTV systems. No listings contradict or deny the presence of video security; some are simply silent. With multiple explicit mentions and no conflicts, the declared value of True is well supported, though not every listing details the system.

Across 48 listings, none mention 'central AC,' 'central air,' or similar building-wide HVAC. Instead, several units explicitly reference individual systems: one notes 'Mitsubishi split AC system throughout the entire apartment,' another mentions 'dual split A/C units,' and others cite 'window AC' or 'NEW BREAKER BOX AND AC WINDOW UNIT INSTALLED' and 'newer window AC unit in the main living area' (at least 5 of 48 listings). Many emphasize 'natural breezes' or 'trade winds' to stay cool. There is no contradictory claim of central air. This consistent pattern strongly supports the declared value of False, though silence in some listings leaves a small possibility of partial building upgrades.

Strong evidence supports split AC in this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention "dual split A/C units" and a "Mitsubishi split AC system throughout the entire apartment," showing this is not just checkbox noise. The remarks come from multiple listings/agents and align with the prior high-confidence history, so this feature should be kept.

Window AC is clearly supported by the remarks. At least 4+ listings explicitly mention it with phrases like "window AC," "AC Window Unit Installed," "newer window AC unit," and "a window AC unit for added comfort." The evidence appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, so this building should be treated as offering window air conditioning in some units.

Concrete construction appears to be a stable building characteristic for 1717 Ala Wai. Across the provided remarks there are no contradictions, and the MLS history is overwhelmingly consistent (19 of 20 listings marked CONCRE), suggesting this is not a copy-paste error.

Only 4 of 20 current listings include DOUWAL in construction_materials and agent remarks contain no explicit mentions of 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' Historical records indicate this feature was previously flagged, but the current evidence is sparse and inconsistent—buyer/owner verification recommended.

Historical research and the current remarks set show no references at all to hollow tile, despite dozens of detailed descriptions of building upgrades and repairs. With just 1 of 20 listings ticking HOLTIL against this backdrop, hollow-tile construction is almost certainly not a feature of this building.

Although 3 of 20 current MLS records check 'masonry/stucco,' none of the public remarks (across the many listings) mention 'masonry' or 'stucco.' Given prior high-confidence evidence of absence and the lack of any descriptive remarks, the MASSTU checks are likely erroneous and the building should not be marked as masonry/stucco.

Across the provided remarks, steel frame construction is not mentioned at all, despite one current MLS record checking STEFRA. The historical pattern strongly suggests this is likely a copy/paste or checkbox error rather than a verified feature change. Because there is no supporting remark evidence of steel frame construction, it should not be treated as a confirmed building characteristic.

3 of 20 current listings list SLAB in construction_materials, but public remarks across listings do not explicitly state 'concrete slab' or 'slab foundation.' Given the lack of explicit mention in remarks and sparse checkbox usage, the existence of a slab foundation is uncertain and should be verified by the owner or a site inspection.

No analysis available

Across 48 listings for 1717 Ala Wai, none explicitly mention 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction.' Instead, multiple listings repeatedly describe it as a 'secure, well-maintained high-rise' and 'secured high-rise building,' language typically associated with concrete/steel structures in Waikiki. Several remarks reference extensive spalling, plumbing retrofits, and parking deck repairs, e.g., 'tower spalling and painting' and 'P-2 parking deck spalling repairs,' which strongly imply reinforced concrete rather than wood. No listing (0 of 48) provides any indication of wood framing, and there is no conflicting evidence. Given the consistent high-rise characterization and concrete-related maintenance, the declared value of False for wood-frame construction is well supported, though the absence of an explicit statement about structural material leaves a small residual uncertainty.

There is little to no public-remarks support for above-ground construction at 1717 Ala Wai. Because only 4 of 20 recent listings checked ABOGRO and the remarks are silent on it, this looks more like inconsistent checkbox usage than a verified building feature.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly mention brick construction or a brick exterior. The remarks focus on views, amenities, and building upgrades such as 're-piped plumbing, elevator modernization, & a refreshed rec deck & pool' and repeated references to 'spalling, plumbing, elevators, recreation deck' and painting. These indicate a typical reinforced-concrete high-rise rather than a brick building. Zero of 48 listings use terms like 'brick exterior' or 'brick-and-mortar construction,' and there is no conflicting evidence suggesting brick. Given this consistent silence on brick and emphasis on concrete-related repairs, the declared value of False is well supported, with the caveat that absence of mention is not absolute proof.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly mention 'single wall construction,' 'single wall,' or similar phrases. Instead, several remarks emphasize substantial structural and systems upgrades, such as 're-piped plumbing, elevator modernization, & a refreshed rec deck' and 'waste line replacement, P-2 parking deck spalling repairs and coating, new railing around the building.' Multiple listings (at least 10 of 48) describe the property as a 'secure, well-maintained high-rise' or 'recently renovated, sought after building,' which strongly implies conventional concrete/steel construction typical of Waikiki high-rises rather than older single-wall wood. No listing suggests traditional Hawaiian single-wall style, and there is no conflicting evidence. Given this consistent silence on single-wall construction and repeated high-rise framing cues, the declared value of False is well supported, though absolute confirmation would require building plans or permits.

I searched for STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental permitted, NUC, TVU, hotel program language, and similar references. The remarks do not provide any affirmative evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, so this is treated as not allowed based on absence of support.

I looked for hotel pool references like Hilton pool, Ritz pool, Trump pool, managed-by-hotel language, or any rental pool program. None appear in the remarks, and there is also no evidence that STR is allowed.

I searched for wording such as mandatory hotel pool, must participate, cannot opt out, or required rental program. Since the remarks do not indicate any hotel rental pool and do not suggest mandatory participation, this is false.

Across 48 listings for 1717 Ala Wai, none of the remarks explicitly mention land tenure as “fee simple,” “FS,” “leasehold,” “LH,” “owns land,” or similar phrases. The text focuses on views, amenities, insurance, and special assessments, with quotes like “1717 Ala Wai stands out from other buildings” and “building has completed major projects,” but never addresses ownership of the underlying land. Because 0 of 48 listings reference tenure at all, there is no direct evidence that any unit is Fee Simple. With no contradictory mentions either, the declared value of True is not supported by the remarks alone, so it must be treated as unverified and likely false based on this corpus.

Across 48 listings, none of the remarks explicitly mention leasehold-related terms such as 'leasehold', 'LH', 'land lease', 'lease rent', or any lease expiration dates. All descriptions focus on upgrades, amenities, assessments, and insurance, with quotes like '1717 Ala Wai stands out' and 'well-managed building' but never reference land tenure. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting any unit is leasehold. Because 0 of 48 listings indicate leasehold and such a material fact is typically disclosed, the evidence strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that tenure is inferred from silence in remarks only.

I searched the remarks for leasehold wording such as ground lease, lease expires, leasehold expiring, and renewal/extension dates. Nothing in the listings indicates the building is leasehold or provides a lease expiration year.

The public remarks provide repeated, explicit evidence that VA financing is supported. The strongest indicators are the assumable 2.25% VA loan references, which are direct and consistent across listings.

The remarks repeatedly and explicitly confirm full building insurance coverage. Phrases such as "100% hurricane insurance coverage" and "Building fully insured" are direct matches to the feature definition. This is strong, repeated evidence, so confidence is very high.

Across the provided listings, fire sprinklers are explicitly negated in 2 remarks. The key language is consistent: 'Sprinklers system not mandated to be installed' and 'powerful fire hoses on each floor,' which points away from a sprinkler system being present or marketed. The rest of the remarks do not mention sprinklers, so the evidence favors omitting this feature.

I searched for fire/life safety compliance language, including FLSE, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection wording. The remarks mention items like fire hoses, smoke detectors, and fire-code drywall, but those are not the same as a formal passed evaluation. With no direct evidence of a passed FLSE, I set this to false at medium confidence.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly supported across many listings and appear to be a consistent building feature. Multiple remarks explicitly say "ocean views," "sweeping ocean views," and "Pacific Ocean vistas," with several different agents repeating similar language. This aligns with high-confidence MLS data showing 16/20 listings referencing OCEAN.

Mountain views are clearly present in the building, even if not every unit has them. Current remarks mention mountains in several listings, and the historical MLS data shows repeated mountain/Koolau references. Evidence is strong and consistent across listings.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly mention a Diamond Head view. View descriptions consistently reference other landmarks: “panoramic views of the ocean, yacht harbor, Ala Wai Canal, and majestic Koolau mountains,” “sweeping city, canal, and ocean views,” and “mountain, canal, and ocean views from your lanai.” One unit notes it is on the “preferred Diamond Head side of the building” but still only lists “ocean, city, canal, and mountain views,” not Diamond Head itself. With 0 of 48 listings citing a Diamond Head view and no contradictory evidence, the declared value of false is well supported, though silence doesn’t absolutely preclude a limited DH view from some stacks.

City views are one of the building’s most consistently documented features. Remarks from multiple listings mention "city skyline," "city lights," and "cityscape," confirming that this is not just copy-paste noise. The MLS history is also very strong at 17/20 listings referencing CITY.

Coastline views are explicitly confirmed in at least one current remark, and another describes 'Great Canal & Coastal Views!' This is less frequently mentioned than ocean or city, but the direct wording is strong enough to support inclusion.

Across 48 listings, views are consistently described as 'ocean, yacht harbor, Ala Wai Canal, and... mountains,' 'city, canal, and ocean views,' or 'panoramic ocean, city, canal, and mountain views.' Several units note 'relax... overlooking the rec deck and Ala Wai canal' or 'Fantastic location with a CANAL VIEW!' but none mention a 'garden view,' 'courtyard view,' or landscaped grounds. I found 0 of 48 listings explicitly referencing any garden-related view. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting garden vistas. Given this uniform emphasis on water, city, and mountain views and total silence on gardens, the declared value of True is not supported, though a small chance remains that minor garden areas exist but are not marketed.

At least one recent listing clearly states panoramic “golf course” views in combination with city and marina vistas, indicating that certain stack orientations capture the Ala Wai Golf Course. Given the building’s canal-front position and that even a subset of higher or correctly oriented units can see the fairways, buyers seeking golf-course views should consider this building.

Marina/canal views are clearly supported by both public remarks and the MLS pattern. Many listings reference the Ala Wai Canal, and some explicitly mention "marina view," "yacht harbor," or canal views from the lanai and bedrooms. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with strong historical MLS support.

No listings in the provided remarks explicitly mention 'sunrise', 'morning sun', or 'eastern exposure'. While many listings describe sunsets and various directional views (ocean, canal, mountains, city), there is no evidence that 'sunrise view' is a described or promoted feature in any unit.

Sunset views are clearly present, though less universal than ocean, city, and canal views. Multiple listings specifically call out "sunset skies," "sunset cocktails," and "ocean sunsets," indicating this is a real building-level selling point for some units. The MLS data also shows recurring sunset references, supporting the feature with solid confidence.

Across 48 listings, views are consistently described as 'ocean, yacht harbor, Ala Wai Canal, and mountains,' 'city, canal, and ocean views,' or similar phrases like 'panoramic ocean, coastline, canal, cityscape and mountains.' None of the 48 remarks mention a cemetery, 'cemetery view,' or anything overlooking burial grounds. Several units emphasize being on the 'cooler side' or 'quiet side' with canal and skyline vistas, further reinforcing the dominant view corridors. There is no conflicting or contradictory evidence. Given this complete silence on cemetery views and strong emphasis on alternative views, the declared value of false for view_cemetery is well supported, with only the usual caveat that unmentioned minor views cannot be entirely ruled out.

I searched for explicit view language such as 'fireworks view,' 'watch fireworks from the lanai,' or 'see fireworks from the unit,' and did not find it. The only related remark is that the building is near the weekly Hilton fireworks, which indicates location, not a confirmed view.

No analysis available

The feature loc_hobron_ena likely indicates a Hobron Lane/entrance-of-Waikiki location. In the 48-listing corpus, at least 6 listings explicitly describe this: e.g., one says the unit is 'at the entrance of Waikiki' and another repeats 'located at the entrance of Waikiki.' Others reinforce this by calling it 'the gateway to Waikiki' or 'on the edge of Waikiki' and noting proximity to Ala Moana and the Convention Center. No listing contradicts this by placing the building deeper inside Waikiki or elsewhere. Many additional remarks emphasize walking access to Ala Moana and beaches, consistent with the Hobron/entrance area. Given multiple explicit confirmations and no conflicts, I judge the declared value True as well supported, with only minor caveat that the exact Hobron label is inferred from context rather than named directly.

Evidence strongly supports pets being allowed. At least 4 of 48 listings explicitly mention pets: one notes 'Safe floor for children and pets,' another states 'Cat and service dog friendly,' and two others specify 'The building allows one pet per household, with dogs requiring registration as service or support animals' and 'PETS:One pet per household. Cats ok. Dogs must be registered service/support animals.' One listing simply says 'Pet friendly.' No listings say 'no pets' or prohibit animals. The repeated, explicit pet policies confirm the declared value of True, with the caveat that dogs must be service/support animals and there is a one-pet limit.

The building is consistently described as having a resident/on-site manager across multiple listings. At least 3 separate remarks explicitly mention it, including 'dedicated in-house residential manager,' 'resident manager,' and 'on-site manager.' This is strong, repeated evidence from multiple agents and aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS data.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly mention condotel characteristics such as a 'hotel rental pool,' 'hotel front desk,' 'hotel program,' or the words 'condotel' or 'condo-hotel.' Instead, remarks consistently describe it as a 'secured high-rise' or 'well-managed building' with amenities like 'pool, hot tub, sauna, BBQ area, fitness room, 24-hour security.' Several listings emphasize owner-occupant or investor use, but never hotel-style operations. No listing (0 of 48) contradicts this by referencing hotel management. The uniform silence on hotel operations strongly supports the declared value of false, with no evident caveats beyond the usual possibility of unmentioned private rental arrangements.

Across 48 listings, every remark consistently describes units as 'condo,' 'condominium,' or 'apartment' (e.g., '2 bed condo,' '2-bedroom, 2-bath condo,' '3 bedroom 2 bath upgraded Condo'), with zero mentions of 'co-op,' 'cooperative,' or related ownership structures. At least 15 listings explicitly use the word 'condo' or 'condominium' while discussing fee-based amenities, special assessments, and hurricane insurance typical of condo associations, not co-ops. No listing contradicts this by suggesting cooperative ownership. The complete absence of co-op terminology, combined with repeated condo language, strongly supports the declared value of False, with minimal caveats.