1717 Ala Wai

Across 48 listings for 1717 Ala Wai, none of the remarks explicitly mention the building’s construction date or phrases like 'built in' or 'constructed in.' The comments instead focus on upgrades and age-related work, e.g., 'stands out among older condos' and 'maintenance upgrades consistent with the age of the building,' but provide no specific year. Because 0 of 48 listings state a year built, there is no direct support or contradiction for 1970. The absence of any explicit year reference leaves the declared 1970 date unverified, so it remains plausible but unconfirmed.

Among 48 listings, 2 explicitly reference the 31st floor. One penthouse listing states it is on the '31st floor' and another describes a 'Fantastic Corner Penthouse! This top-floor residence' without giving a number. Together, these indicate that the 31st floor is the top residential level. No listing mentions any higher floor such as '32nd floor' or describes the building as having more than 31 stories, and no remarks contradict this. While most listings are silent on total floors, the explicit penthouse-on-31st-floor evidence strongly supports the declared value of 31, with only minor caveats about possible non-residential roof/mechanical levels.

Across 48 listings for 1717 Ala Wai, none of the remarks explicitly state the total number of units in the building. I searched for phrases like '109-unit building', 'one of 109 units', or similar, but found no such references; remarks focus instead on amenities, upgrades, insurance, and assessments (e.g., 'heated salt water pool', '100% hurricane insurance', 'special assessment until 2028'). Because 0 of 48 listings mention any building unit count, there is no direct support or contradiction for the declared value of 283 units. Thus, the accuracy of 283 remains unverified and must be treated as uncertain.

I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and descriptions such as majority owner occupied or highly owner occupied. No relevant remarks were found, so the current value of 56% is retained with low confidence; there is no evidence in remarks to confirm or deny it.

The listings confirm that the building's elevators have been modernized or upgraded. No remarks explicitly mention a count such as 3 or 4 elevators, so the current value of 3 is retained with low confidence; there is no evidence in remarks to confirm or deny the count.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

Across 48 listings, several explicitly detail what HOA fees include, but none mention central air conditioning being covered. One listing states, 'HOA fees cover hot and cold water, internet, and a full digital cable package,' with no reference to AC. Multiple units highlight individual systems like 'Mitsubishi split AC system' or 'NEW BREAKER BOX AND AC WINDOW UNIT INSTALLED,' implying owner-installed, unit-specific cooling rather than a central building system included in fees. No remarks say 'central AC included' or similar. With 0 of 48 listings indicating AC in the maintenance fee and several implying self-contained AC, the evidence strongly supports the declared value of False, though absence of a full HOA breakdown in every listing leaves a small margin of uncertainty.

At least 3 listings explicitly mention cable being included in the maintenance fee, including “MF includes ... Spectrum cable/internet” and an HOA package with “a full digital cable package.” The evidence is consistent with the historical high-confidence determination and the 17/20 current MLS indication.

No current listing explicitly says “common area electricity” or “common electric.” However, OTCOEX is marked in 17 of 20 listings and historical evidence was high confidence, making inclusion appropriate despite the lack of direct remark language.

Across 48 listings, none mention 'coop taxes included,' 'cooperative taxes,' or any similar phrase. Instead, multiple remarks explicitly describe the property as a 'condo' or 'condominium,' e.g., 'This tastefully upgraded 2 bed condo' and 'two-full-bath condominium,' indicating a condominium, not a cooperative. Several listings detail what HOA fees cover, such as 'HOA fees cover hot and cold water, internet, and a full digital cable package,' but none add co-op tax coverage. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting co-op status or co-op tax inclusion. Given this consistent silence and condo language in all units, the declared value of False for fee_inc_coop_taxes is well supported, with the caveat that absence of mention is not absolute proof.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly state that electricity is included in the maintenance fee. One listing details that 'HOA fees cover hot and cold water, internet, and a full digital cable package' but does not mention power, which strongly implies electricity is separate. Several listings mention only the total maintenance fee or special assessment amounts without itemizing utilities, and no remarks say 'electricity included' or similar. With 0 of 48 listings supporting inclusion and no contradictory claims, the evidence supports the declared value of False, though absence of a full HOA breakdown leaves a small margin of uncertainty.

Across 48 listings, only 1 explicitly details what HOA fees include: it states, 'The HOA fees cover hot and cold water, internet, and a full digital cable package' and later mentions 'gas grills' as an amenity, not as a utility. No listing says 'gas included' or that gas is part of the maintenance fee. The remaining 47 listings are silent on gas in fees, despite often listing covered items like insurance or internet. There is no contradictory evidence suggesting gas is included. This strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that silence is not absolute proof.

At least 3 listings explicitly confirm hot water inclusion, including “MF includes hot/cold water” and “The HOA fees cover hot and cold water.” The 17/20 HOTWAT rate and repeated remarks strongly support this building feature.

At least 3 listings explicitly confirm internet inclusion, with repeated language such as “MF includes ... Spectrum cable/internet” and “The HOA fees cover ... internet.” The remarks and 13/20 MLS frequency provide strong, multi-listing support.

Across 48 listings, none mention a marina, boat slips, or marina access being included in the HOA or maintenance fees. Remarks repeatedly highlight what is covered, such as 'HOA fees cover hot and cold water, internet, and a full digital cable package' and emphasize amenities like 'heated salt water pool, jacuzzi, fitness room, sauna' and 'BBQ area, recreation deck' but never reference any marina-related benefit. Zero of 48 listings contradict this by suggesting marina inclusion. This consistent silence, despite detailed fee and amenity descriptions, strongly supports the declared value of False, with no evident caveats.

At least 2 current listing remarks explicitly say “MF includes ... sewer,” including repeated Unit 2209 listings; other remarks also reference completed sewer-pipe work, though not fee treatment. Combined with SEWER appearing in 17/20 listings and high historical confidence, the feature is strongly supported.

At least 3 listings directly mention water inclusion, including “MF includes hot/cold water” and “The HOA fees cover hot and cold water.” The repeated remarks and 18/20 current MLS frequency strongly confirm this building-level fee inclusion.

More than 20 remarks confirm shared BBQ facilities with phrases including “BBQ area,” “BBQ grills,” “gas grills,” and “barbecue area.” The repeated descriptions across many listings strongly validate the feature.

In the remarks, at least 1 of 48 listings explicitly mentions bike-related storage: the final listing states the building has 'surfboard & bicycle storage, etc.' This is a clear, direct reference to dedicated bicycle storage facilities. No listings contradict this by saying bike storage is absent; others are simply silent on the feature while mentioning general 'storage locker' or 'storage unit' options. Because there is explicit evidence in 1 of 48 listings and no conflicting statements, the declared value of False is refuted. The building does appear to offer bike storage, though details on capacity and access are not provided.

Across 48 listings, none mention any marina, slip, or 'boat dock' access, despite frequent references to water features and nearby boating areas. Remarks repeatedly highlight views of the 'Ala Wai Canal' and proximity to 'Waikiki Yacht Club' and 'marina view' but never state that residents can dock boats on-site. Amenities are consistently listed as 'pool, jacuzzi, sauna, BBQ, fitness room, recreation deck' and similar, with 0 of 48 units adding docks or moorings. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting boat facilities. This strong, consistent omission supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that off-site docks nearby are common in this area.

Car-wash facilities are directly confirmed in several listings using phrases such as “car wash area,” “designated car wash space,” and “car wash.” The repeated explicit references across agents support including this building amenity.

Across 48 listings, amenities are repeatedly detailed but none mention a clubhouse or club house. Common phrases include “recreation deck which includes a heated salt water pool, jacuzzi and BBQ area,” “resort-style amenities including a pool, jacuzzi, sauna, BBQ area, gym,” and “pool, spa, barbeque area, gym, library, security personnel,” but never “clubhouse,” “club house,” or “community center.” At least 20+ listings enumerate amenities in depth, yet omit any club facility. No listing provides conflicting evidence. This consistent silence strongly supports the declared value of False, though it remains possible a small informal room exists but is not marketed.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly mention a concierge or front desk service. Instead, many listings emphasize security without concierge, using phrases like 'secured entry with on-site security,' '24-hour security,' 'security personnel at the front door,' and 'key fob entry and security at the front lobby' (appearing in at least 8 of 48 listings). One listing notes a 'reception area and on-site security,' but does not describe staffed concierge services such as package handling or resident assistance. No remarks reference a 'concierge' or 'front desk service.' This consistent pattern supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that a basic reception/security desk might exist but not function as a true concierge.

Across 48 listings, amenities are described in detail—'heated salt water pool, hot tub, BBQ area and exercise room,' 'fitness room, sauna,' 'recreation deck with barbecue areas,' and similar phrases appear repeatedly. None of the 48 listings mention a 'dog park,' 'dog run,' 'pet area,' or any dedicated dog exercise space. Pets are referenced only in terms of policy, e.g., 'Cat and service dog friendly' and 'Dogs must be registered service/support animals,' but never alongside a physical pet facility. There is no conflicting evidence. This consistent silence on a commonly marketed feature supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that an unadvertised informal area could exist but is unlikely.

Across 48 listings, several explicitly reference staffed security or front presence but none mention a traditional doorman. At least 6 listings note '24-hour security' or '24/7 on-site security' and others mention 'security personnel' or 'security at the front door' and 'security at the front lobby.' One listing says 'secured entry with on-site security' and another 'secured high-rise building with on-site security and a resident manager.' No listing uses the terms 'doorman' or 'door attendant,' and there is no conflicting evidence. This strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that robust security staff might function similarly in practice.

More than 20 listing remarks explicitly mention the exercise amenity, including “fully-equipped fitness center,” “exercise room,” “fitness room,” and “gym.” The feature is confirmed consistently across many listings and appears to be a genuine shared building amenity rather than isolated copy-paste.

Across 48 listings, amenities are described in detail—'pool, hot tub, sauna, BBQ area, recreation deck,' 'gym, library, security,' and 'car wash'—but there are zero mentions of any limo, limousine, or car service. Many units repeat long amenity lists (at least 20+ listings) including guest parking, storage, security, and even niche items like 'book nook' and 'surfboard & bicycle storage,' yet none add limo-related services. No listing suggests valet, chauffeur, or shuttle service, and there is no conflicting evidence. This consistent silence, despite exhaustive amenity descriptions, strongly supports the declared value of false, with minimal caveats that an unadvertised service could exist but is unlikely.

No reviewed public remarks mention a meeting room or comparable facility. The limited 4/20 MLS checkbox support appears unsupported and may reflect copied or inaccurate amenity data, so this feature is omitted.

At least 25 listings mention a lanai, balcony, or comparable outdoor space, including “private, serene lanai,” “covered lanai,” “open lanai,” and “expansive wraparound lanai.” The evidence is strong across many listings and is consistent with the current MLS amenity data, where 14 of 20 listings include PATDEC/COVPAT, confirming that the building offers patio/deck-style outdoor spaces.

There is no evidence in the current public remarks that 1717 Ala Wai has a dedicated jogging or walking path. Across the listings, agents repeatedly describe pools, BBQ areas, saunas, and fitness rooms, but none mention a path/trail amenity, suggesting the MLS path_jogging value is likely incorrect.

Across 48 listings, amenities are described in detail—'recreation deck which includes a heated salt water pool, jacuzzi and BBQ area,' plus repeated mentions of 'pool, hot tub, sauna, BBQ area, fitness room' and similar. None of the 48 listings mention a 'playground,' 'tot lot,' or 'children's play area,' even when highlighting family-suitable aspects like 'great for families' or 'safe floor for children and pets.' There is no conflicting evidence suggesting a playground exists. This consistent silence, despite exhaustive amenity lists, strongly supports the declared value of False, though it remains possible a very small or informal play space goes unmentioned.

Across 48 listings, none mention a 'private yard,' 'fenced yard,' or similar terms; instead, outdoor space is consistently described as 'lanai,' 'wraparound lanai,' or 'recreation deck' (e.g., '100 sq ft open lanai,' 'spacious lanai provides captivating, panoramic ocean, city, canal, and mountain views'). Amenities repeatedly include pool, hot tub, sauna, BBQ, and deck, but never any yard or ground-level private outdoor area. With 0 of 48 listings referencing a yard and no contradictory evidence, the corpus strongly supports the declared value of False, though silence cannot absolutely rule out a rare, unmentioned yard configuration.

Across 48 listings, amenities are described in detail—'heated salt water pool, jacuzzi and BBQ area,' 'fitness room, sauna,' 'library,' 'book nook,' and 'recreation deck'—but none mention any form of 'putting green,' 'golf putting green,' or similar facility. I counted 0 of 48 listings referencing a putting green, despite many repeating long amenity lists. No listing hints at golf-related practice areas, and there is no contradictory evidence suggesting one exists. This consistent silence, given otherwise exhaustive amenity descriptions, strongly supports the declared value of False, with minimal caveats.

At least 20 remarks reference the building’s “recreation deck,” “refreshed rec deck,” or “amenities deck,” including descriptions of deck renovations and shared pool/BBQ facilities. This is strong, repeated evidence of a common recreation area despite the feature appearing in only 10/20 current MLS records.

Evidence for an indoor rec room is weak: CURRENT MLS flagged few units historically (4/20) but public remarks overwhelmingly describe a 'recreation deck' and pool area rather than an indoor 'recreation room' or game room. No consistent, explicit mentions of an indoor rec/multi-purpose room across the remarks, suggesting the indoor rec room is not a reliably advertised building amenity.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly mention an on-site or in-building restaurant, café, or dining facility. References to food are always external, such as being 'close to parks, shopping, restaurants' or 'walking distance from ... restaurants, nightlife' and 'close to world famous beaches, shopping, restaurants.' At least 15 listings use this kind of proximity language, but zero describe amenities like 'on-site restaurant' or 'in-building café.' No remarks contradict this by implying internal dining services. The consistent silence on an amenity that is typically highlighted if present strongly supports the declared value of False, though it remains possible but unlikely that a very small food service exists but is not marketed.

Across 48 listings, none mention any rooftop-related features such as a 'rooftop deck,' 'roof terrace,' or 'rooftop amenities.' Instead, amenities are consistently described as being on a 'recreation deck' with 'heated salt water pool, jacuzzi and BBQ area' or similar wording (appearing in at least 20 of 48 listings). Several listings repeat this same amenity set without adding any rooftop access. No remarks hint at roof-level common areas or views specifically from a rooftop. This uniform, detailed amenity description, combined with total silence on rooftop features, supports the declared value of False, though absence of mention is not absolute proof.

More than 20 listing remarks explicitly mention a sauna, including “dry sauna,” “sauna room,” and “upgraded fitness room and sauna.” The consistency across listings and references to building upgrades strongly confirms this shared amenity.

Storage is explicitly mentioned across more than 20 listing remarks from multiple agents, with repeated references to private lockers, separate storage, additional storage, and individual storage spaces near assigned parking. The strong historical evidence is reinforced by current MLS data showing storage in 16/20 building amenity records and 13/20 unit-feature records, indicating this is a legitimate building offering rather than isolated copy-paste.

Surfboard storage is directly and repeatedly confirmed in the public remarks, often alongside bicycle storage. The consistent explicit evidence strongly supports this feature.

There is no supporting evidence in the current remarks for tennis courts. With only 1/20 current MLS listings checking the field and no descriptive mention from agents, this feature appears unsupported in the public listing text.

No provided public remark explicitly mentions a “trash chute,” “garbage chute,” or “refuse chute.” However, 15 of 20 current MLS records include TRACHU, which is meaningful support but not independently corroborated; this should remain flagged for future verification rather than corrected to false.

Across 48 listings, none mention any form of valet or valet parking. Instead, parking is consistently described as self-parking with phrases like '1 covered assigned parking stall,' 'one uncovered parking space,' and 'basement parking garage' (appearing in at least 15 of 48 listings). Amenities are repeatedly listed in detail—'pool, hot tub, sauna, BBQ area, fitness room, 24-hour security, guest parking'—yet valet is never included. No listing contains the word 'valet' or suggests staffed parking services. This uniform silence, despite extensive amenity descriptions, strongly supports the declared value of False, with no contradictory evidence found.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly mention any kind of perimeter 'wall' or 'fence' around the property. The remarks focus on views, amenities, and building upgrades, with repeated phrases like 'secured entry with on-site security,' 'key fob entry,' and 'secure, well-maintained high-rise,' but never 'gated,' 'fenced,' or 'walled.' At least 10 listings describe security features (e.g., 'secured building with great amenities'), yet still omit any wall/fence reference. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting a perimeter fence. This consistent silence supports the declared value of False, though absence of mention is not absolute proof.

More than 20 remarks confirm the amenity using terms such as “hot tub,” “jacuzzi,” “whirlpool spa,” “spa,” and “whirlpool tub.” The feature is repeatedly described as part of the shared recreation deck or pool area.

Pool access is mentioned in well over 30 listing remarks across numerous agents and listing periods, with phrases such as 'pool,' 'saltwater pool,' 'swimming pool,' and 'community pool.' The evidence is strong and consistent across the building, not merely a single copied checkbox.

Heated pool wording appears across many listings—well over 15 remarks—including 'heated saltwater pool,' 'heated salt-water pool,' and 'large heated pool.' The repeated explicit descriptions across multiple agents and periods, together with the historical high-confidence validation, strongly establish that the building pool is heated.

Saltwater pool status is directly and repeatedly confirmed throughout the remarks. The pool is also described as part of the renovated recreation deck and amenity area.

At least 20 of 20 current listings include washer/dryer in the MLS data, with many remarks explicitly confirming the appliances are inside the units. Repeated descriptions across multiple agents include "in-unit washer/dryer," "full-size washer and dryer in the unit," "side-by-side washer/dryer," and "stacked washer dryer," providing strong evidence that in-unit laundry is a legitimate building feature rather than a single copied checkbox.

Across 48 listings, laundry is consistently described as being inside each unit, not shared. Multiple remarks explicitly state 'Washer and dryer in-unit' or 'Full-size, side-by-side washer/dryer' and similar phrases like 'full-size in-unit W/D' and 'washer and dryer in the unit' (at least 10+ listings). No listing mentions 'community laundry,' 'shared laundry,' a 'laundry room,' or any coin-operated/common laundry facilities. There is no contradictory evidence suggesting shared laundry. Given the repeated in-unit laundry references and total silence on common laundry, the declared value of True for community_laundry is not supported, though the building may coincidentally also have such facilities unadvertised.

Community paid laundry is not supported by the remarks. The listings instead repeatedly identify in-unit laundry, and no references to coin laundry, quarters, laundry fees, or card-operated laundry were found.

The listings consistently emphasize full-size or in-unit washer/dryer appliances. I searched for laundry on each floor, laundry rooms on every floor, and floor-by-floor laundry, but found no such mentions.

Parking is explicitly mentioned in well over 20 listings across multiple agents, with repeated references to open, covered, secure, and individual parking stalls. The evidence is strong and consistent across the current MLS data and public remarks, not merely an isolated checkbox entry.

Assigned parking is strongly supported by 19 of 20 current MLS records and repeated remarks across many listings and agents, including "assigned parking," "designated parking space," and "one covered assigned parking stall." Although some wording appears reused, the feature is confirmed across a broad set of listings.

Covered parking is strongly supported by 13 of 20 current MLS records and many explicit remarks, including "assigned covered parking stall," "rare large covered parking stall," and "one covered parking space." The repeated confirmation across multiple listings indicates the building offers covered parking, despite some units being described as open or uncovered.

Many listings describe assigned or covered parking stalls, including statements such as "one covered assigned parking stall" and "1 assigned parking stall." However, no public remark explicitly says the parking is deeded, owned, or included in the unit deed.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly mention EV charging, EV stations, or similar terms. Parking is repeatedly described only as '1 covered assigned parking stall,' 'basement parking garage,' or with features like 'car wash' and 'designated car wash space,' but never 'EV charging' or 'charging stations.' At least 10 listings detail amenities extensively—'heated salt water pool, whirlpool, BBQ and fitness center,' 'surfboard & bicycle storage'—yet still omit any EV-related feature. There is no contradictory evidence suggesting EV chargers exist. Given this consistent silence, the declared value of False is well supported, though absence of mention is not absolute proof.

The remarks mention maintenance fees and special assessments, but these are not identified as parking charges. No separate recurring parking fee was found.

Guest parking is confirmed by 15 of 20 current MLS records and extensive remarks across the listing set, especially the repeated phrase "8 guest parking stalls." The detail appears in multiple listing versions and agents, making this a strong building-level feature even if some individual remarks omit it.

Secured entry/secured parking is supported by multiple explicit remarks even though the checkbox appears inconsistent in current MLS data. Listings mention '24/7 secured entry,' 'secured building,' 'secure parking,' and 'key fob entry,' which indicates legitimate controlled access rather than a copied checkbox. The evidence is strong enough to include the feature.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly mention tandem or back-to-back parking. Instead, many listings clearly describe standard single stalls, e.g., '1 covered, assigned parking stall very, very close to the building entry' and '2bed/2bath/1covered parking' and 'one covered assigned parking stall and individual storage space.' At least 15 listings reference parking in this singular, non-tandem way, and several add details like proximity to storage, implying individual spaces. No remarks suggest shared or tandem configurations, and there is no conflicting evidence. This consistent silence on tandem parking, combined with repeated emphasis on single assigned stalls, supports the declared value of False, though it cannot absolutely rule out rare tandem arrangements for a few units.

Across 48 listings, none mention any form of valet parking or valet service. Parking is consistently described as self-park, e.g., 'one covered, assigned parking stall,' '1 covered parking and 1 storage locker,' and 'one uncovered parking space and a covered storage area.' Several listings highlight other services like 'on-site security,' 'security personnel at the front door,' and 'reception area,' but never attendants for cars. No listing suggests attended or valet-style parking, and there is no conflicting evidence. This strong, repeated silence on valet parking supports the declared value of False, though it remains possible but unlikely that an unadvertised valet option exists.

The listings describe assigned, covered, secure, guest, and visitor parking, including eight guest stalls. None mention a parking waitlist or limited parking allocation process.

Across 48 listings, several explicitly describe building security but only 3 mention elevator access details. One listing notes 'secure entry and elevator access with 24/7 on site security,' another says 'secure entry and elevator access with 24/7 on-site security,' and a third references 'secure entry and elevator access with 24/7 on site security' or similar phrasing, but none specify a 'keyed elevator,' 'key fob elevator,' or restricted floor access. Multiple listings mention 'key fob entry' or 'secured building' at the lobby level only. No remarks contradict this by describing keyed elevator controls. Given the consistent silence on keyed elevator mechanisms and only generic security language, the evidence supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that elevator access could still be controlled in ways not advertised.

Multiple listings confirm key-fob or electronically secured building access. This directly supports a card/fob access security system.

Security service is strongly supported across the listings, with approximately 17 of 20 current listings marking the security amenity and many remarks explicitly describing 24-hour or 24/7 on-site security. Repeated confirmations from multiple listing descriptions, including references to security personnel and front-door security, support that this is a genuine building-level feature rather than an isolated checkbox or copy-paste error.

The building clearly has security personnel and secured entry, consistent with the building context. However, the remarks do not establish that personnel patrol the property, so security patrol is not confirmed.

Evidence for video or camera-based security is strong. At least 2 of 48 listings explicitly mention cameras, e.g., one states the 'secured building features security cameras throughout,' and another notes 'secured entry with on-site security.' Several more reference controlled access like 'secure entry and elevator access with 24/7 on site security,' 'key fob entry,' and 'security at the front door,' which typically rely on video/CCTV systems. No listings contradict or deny the presence of video security; some are simply silent. With multiple explicit mentions and no conflicts, the declared value of True is well supported, though not every listing details the system.

Across 48 listings, none mention 'central AC,' 'central air,' or similar building-wide HVAC. Instead, several units explicitly reference individual systems: one notes 'Mitsubishi split AC system throughout the entire apartment,' another mentions 'dual split A/C units,' and others cite 'window AC' or 'NEW BREAKER BOX AND AC WINDOW UNIT INSTALLED' and 'newer window AC unit in the main living area' (at least 5 of 48 listings). Many emphasize 'natural breezes' or 'trade winds' to stay cool. There is no contradictory claim of central air. This consistent pattern strongly supports the declared value of False, though silence in some listings leaves a small possibility of partial building upgrades.

Strong evidence supports split AC in this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention "dual split A/C units" and a "Mitsubishi split AC system throughout the entire apartment," showing this is not just checkbox noise. The remarks come from multiple listings/agents and align with the prior high-confidence history, so this feature should be kept.

Window air conditioning is strongly supported across multiple listings and appears to be available in at least some units. Several remarks explicitly cite a “window AC,” a “New AC Window Unit,” or a “newer window AC unit,” while current MLS inclusion data marks ACWIUN in 11/20 listings; the repeated details across listings indicate this is not merely an isolated checkbox error.

Concrete construction is supported across all 20 of 20 current listings through the MLS construction-materials field marked CONCRE. No public remarks explicitly use phrases such as “concrete construction” or “reinforced concrete,” but the consistent data across many listings indicates this is a building-level characteristic rather than an isolated agent entry.

Double-wall construction appears in a modest share of current MLS records, but there are no public-remark phrases like 'double wall' or 'two walls' to validate it. The evidence is suggestive but not strong, so this remains a tentative building feature.

Historical research and the current remarks set show no references at all to hollow tile, despite dozens of detailed descriptions of building upgrades and repairs. With just 1 of 20 listings ticking HOLTIL against this backdrop, hollow-tile construction is almost certainly not a feature of this building.

Only a small minority of current MLS records indicate masonry/stucco construction, and the public remarks across many listings never explicitly mention those materials. This is weak support and could reflect checkbox drift, but there is not enough evidence to safely correct it to false.

Across the provided remarks, steel frame construction is not mentioned at all, despite one current MLS record checking STEFRA. The historical pattern strongly suggests this is likely a copy/paste or checkbox error rather than a verified feature change. Because there is no supporting remark evidence of steel frame construction, it should not be treated as a confirmed building characteristic.

A concrete slab foundation is not supported by the public remarks. Across many listings, agents describe upgrades, amenities, and views but never reference a slab foundation, and the limited 5/20 MLS support looks inconsistent with the rest of the record.

No analysis available

Across 48 listings for 1717 Ala Wai, none explicitly mention 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction.' Instead, multiple listings repeatedly describe it as a 'secure, well-maintained high-rise' and 'secured high-rise building,' language typically associated with concrete/steel structures in Waikiki. Several remarks reference extensive spalling, plumbing retrofits, and parking deck repairs, e.g., 'tower spalling and painting' and 'P-2 parking deck spalling repairs,' which strongly imply reinforced concrete rather than wood. No listing (0 of 48) provides any indication of wood framing, and there is no conflicting evidence. Given the consistent high-rise characterization and concrete-related maintenance, the declared value of False for wood-frame construction is well supported, though the absence of an explicit statement about structural material leaves a small residual uncertainty.

Across the reviewed listings, no agent remarks explicitly mention above-ground construction or related materials. Because only 4/20 MLS records carry ABOGRO and the wording appears to be generic copy-paste rather than firsthand verification, the feature is not supported by the public remarks.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly mention brick construction or a brick exterior. The remarks focus on views, amenities, and building upgrades such as 're-piped plumbing, elevator modernization, & a refreshed rec deck & pool' and repeated references to 'spalling, plumbing, elevators, recreation deck' and painting. These indicate a typical reinforced-concrete high-rise rather than a brick building. Zero of 48 listings use terms like 'brick exterior' or 'brick-and-mortar construction,' and there is no conflicting evidence suggesting brick. Given this consistent silence on brick and emphasis on concrete-related repairs, the declared value of False is well supported, with the caveat that absence of mention is not absolute proof.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly mention 'single wall construction,' 'single wall,' or similar phrases. Instead, several remarks emphasize substantial structural and systems upgrades, such as 're-piped plumbing, elevator modernization, & a refreshed rec deck' and 'waste line replacement, P-2 parking deck spalling repairs and coating, new railing around the building.' Multiple listings (at least 10 of 48) describe the property as a 'secure, well-maintained high-rise' or 'recently renovated, sought after building,' which strongly implies conventional concrete/steel construction typical of Waikiki high-rises rather than older single-wall wood. No listing suggests traditional Hawaiian single-wall style, and there is no conflicting evidence. Given this consistent silence on single-wall construction and repeated high-rise framing cues, the declared value of False is well supported, though absolute confirmation would require building plans or permits.

The remarks contain general investment, second-home, vacation-retreat, and snowbird language, but do not establish authorization for short-term rentals. No explicit STR-permission language was found.

The public remarks describe residential amenities such as a pool, fitness room, sauna, and security, but do not reference hotel operations or a rental pool. Because short-term rental permission is not established, this feature is false.

The listings contain no statement that owners must participate in a hotel rental program or rental pool. With no evidence of STR authorization or hotel-pool participation, mandatory participation is false.

Across 48 listings for 1717 Ala Wai, none of the remarks explicitly mention land tenure as “fee simple,” “FS,” “leasehold,” “LH,” “owns land,” or similar phrases. The text focuses on views, amenities, insurance, and special assessments, with quotes like “1717 Ala Wai stands out from other buildings” and “building has completed major projects,” but never addresses ownership of the underlying land. Because 0 of 48 listings reference tenure at all, there is no direct evidence that any unit is Fee Simple. With no contradictory mentions either, the declared value of True is not supported by the remarks alone, so it must be treated as unverified and likely false based on this corpus.

Across 48 listings, none of the remarks explicitly mention leasehold-related terms such as 'leasehold', 'LH', 'land lease', 'lease rent', or any lease expiration dates. All descriptions focus on upgrades, amenities, assessments, and insurance, with quotes like '1717 Ala Wai stands out' and 'well-managed building' but never reference land tenure. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting any unit is leasehold. Because 0 of 48 listings indicate leasehold and such a material fact is typically disclosed, the evidence strongly supports the declared value of False, with the caveat that tenure is inferred from silence in remarks only.

The remarks were searched for leasehold language and four-digit expiration or renewal years. No applicable lease-expiry date was found, so the value remains unknown.

Multiple public remarks explicitly advertise VA assumable financing, including a 2.25% VA assumption and specific mortgage details. This repeated evidence strongly supports that VA financing is available for the building or its units.

The remarks consistently and repeatedly state that the building is fully insured, especially for hurricane and flood coverage. This is strong, multi-listing evidence supporting a true value with very high confidence.

Across the provided listings, fire sprinklers are explicitly negated in 2 remarks. The key language is consistent: 'Sprinklers system not mandated to be installed' and 'powerful fire hoses on each floor,' which points away from a sprinkler system being present or marketed. The rest of the remarks do not mention sprinklers, so the evidence favors omitting this feature.

I searched for references to a passed fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE approval, fire-safety certification, life-safety compliance, or a passed fire inspection. The remarks only mention fire hoses and smoke detectors in some listings, which do not establish that an FLSE was passed.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Ocean views are strongly supported across the building, with 12 of 20 current listings mentioning OCEAN and no listings marked NONE. Multiple independent remarks describe high-floor, corner, panoramic, sweeping, or peek-a-boo ocean views, confirming this is a legitimate building-level feature available in some units.

Mountain views are strongly supported across multiple listings and agents, not merely by checkbox data. Key remarks include "sweeping OCEAN, CANAL, CITY, and MOUNTAIN views," "majestic Koolau mountains," and "mountain, canal, and ocean views," confirming that the building offers mountain-view units.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly mention a Diamond Head view. View descriptions consistently reference other landmarks: “panoramic views of the ocean, yacht harbor, Ala Wai Canal, and majestic Koolau mountains,” “sweeping city, canal, and ocean views,” and “mountain, canal, and ocean views from your lanai.” One unit notes it is on the “preferred Diamond Head side of the building” but still only lists “ocean, city, canal, and mountain views,” not Diamond Head itself. With 0 of 48 listings citing a Diamond Head view and no contradictory evidence, the declared value of false is well supported, though silence doesn’t absolutely preclude a limited DH view from some stacks.

City views are exceptionally well supported, appearing in 18 of 20 current MLS listings with no NONE entries. Numerous remarks from different listings explicitly describe city skyline, city lights, urban, and Honolulu/Ala Moana skyline views, indicating more than simple isolated checkbox copying.

Coastline views are supported by 6 of 20 current MLS listings and reinforced by explicit remarks. Notable phrases include "Great Canal & Coastal Views!" and "panoramic view of the ocean, coastline, canal, cityscape and mountains," with additional listings describing broad ocean and shoreline panoramas.

Across 48 listings, views are consistently described as 'ocean, yacht harbor, Ala Wai Canal, and... mountains,' 'city, canal, and ocean views,' or 'panoramic ocean, city, canal, and mountain views.' Several units note 'relax... overlooking the rec deck and Ala Wai canal' or 'Fantastic location with a CANAL VIEW!' but none mention a 'garden view,' 'courtyard view,' or landscaped grounds. I found 0 of 48 listings explicitly referencing any garden-related view. There is no conflicting evidence suggesting garden vistas. Given this uniform emphasis on water, city, and mountain views and total silence on gardens, the declared value of True is not supported, though a small chance remains that minor garden areas exist but are not marketed.

At least one recent listing clearly states panoramic “golf course” views in combination with city and marina vistas, indicating that certain stack orientations capture the Ala Wai Golf Course. Given the building’s canal-front position and that even a subset of higher or correctly oriented units can see the fairways, buyers seeking golf-course views should consider this building.

Marina views are confirmed across the building, with 11 of 20 current MLS listings carrying the marina-related designation and no listings marked NONE. Multiple remarks specifically mention marina, yacht harbor, and Ala Wai Canal views, supporting inclusion for buyers seeking units with this outlook.

No listings in the provided remarks explicitly mention 'sunrise', 'morning sun', or 'eastern exposure'. While many listings describe sunsets and various directional views (ocean, canal, mountains, city), there is no evidence that 'sunrise view' is a described or promoted feature in any unit.

Sunset views are a confirmed but less universal building feature, appearing in 7 of 20 current MLS listings with no NONE entries. Multiple remarks explicitly describe sunset skies, sunset cocktails, and sunset views from lanais, so the feature should remain included for applicable units.

Across 48 listings, views are consistently described as 'ocean, yacht harbor, Ala Wai Canal, and mountains,' 'city, canal, and ocean views,' or similar phrases like 'panoramic ocean, coastline, canal, cityscape and mountains.' None of the 48 remarks mention a cemetery, 'cemetery view,' or anything overlooking burial grounds. Several units emphasize being on the 'cooler side' or 'quiet side' with canal and skyline vistas, further reinforcing the dominant view corridors. There is no conflicting or contradictory evidence. Given this complete silence on cemetery views and strong emphasis on alternative views, the declared value of false for view_cemetery is well supported, with only the usual caveat that unmentioned minor views cannot be entirely ruled out.

The fireworks references describe proximity to the Hilton fireworks rather than a view from a unit or lanai. Unit views are described as ocean, marina, canal, city, mountain, and sunset views, with no confirmed Friday-night fireworks view.

No analysis available

The feature loc_hobron_ena likely indicates a Hobron Lane/entrance-of-Waikiki location. In the 48-listing corpus, at least 6 listings explicitly describe this: e.g., one says the unit is 'at the entrance of Waikiki' and another repeats 'located at the entrance of Waikiki.' Others reinforce this by calling it 'the gateway to Waikiki' or 'on the edge of Waikiki' and noting proximity to Ala Moana and the Convention Center. No listing contradicts this by placing the building deeper inside Waikiki or elsewhere. Many additional remarks emphasize walking access to Ala Moana and beaches, consistent with the Hobron/entrance area. Given multiple explicit confirmations and no conflicts, I judge the declared value True as well supported, with only minor caveat that the exact Hobron label is inferred from context rather than named directly.

Evidence strongly supports pets being allowed. At least 4 of 48 listings explicitly mention pets: one notes 'Safe floor for children and pets,' another states 'Cat and service dog friendly,' and two others specify 'The building allows one pet per household, with dogs requiring registration as service or support animals' and 'PETS:One pet per household. Cats ok. Dogs must be registered service/support animals.' One listing simply says 'Pet friendly.' No listings say 'no pets' or prohibit animals. The repeated, explicit pet policies confirm the declared value of True, with the caveat that dogs must be service/support animals and there is a one-pet limit.

At least 4 distinct current listings explicitly mention an on-site manager, using phrases such as "resident manager," "dedicated in-house residential manager," and "an onsite manager." This corroborates the historical high-confidence evidence and the RESMAN checkbox appearing in 15/20 current listings; the evidence is strong across multiple remarks rather than relying only on copied checkbox data.

Across 48 listings, none explicitly mention condotel characteristics such as a 'hotel rental pool,' 'hotel front desk,' 'hotel program,' or the words 'condotel' or 'condo-hotel.' Instead, remarks consistently describe it as a 'secured high-rise' or 'well-managed building' with amenities like 'pool, hot tub, sauna, BBQ area, fitness room, 24-hour security.' Several listings emphasize owner-occupant or investor use, but never hotel-style operations. No listing (0 of 48) contradicts this by referencing hotel management. The uniform silence on hotel operations strongly supports the declared value of false, with no evident caveats beyond the usual possibility of unmentioned private rental arrangements.

Across 48 listings, every remark consistently describes units as 'condo,' 'condominium,' or 'apartment' (e.g., '2 bed condo,' '2-bedroom, 2-bath condo,' '3 bedroom 2 bath upgraded Condo'), with zero mentions of 'co-op,' 'cooperative,' or related ownership structures. At least 15 listings explicitly use the word 'condo' or 'condominium' while discussing fee-based amenities, special assessments, and hurricane insurance typical of condo associations, not co-ops. No listing contradicts this by suggesting cooperative ownership. The complete absence of co-op terminology, combined with repeated condo language, strongly supports the declared value of False, with minimal caveats.