1650 Piikoi
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1650 Piikoi
Building Overview
1650 Piikoi in Makiki-Tantalus; 1974 concrete building with mountain views and a BBQ area.
About 1650 Piikoi
1650 Piikoi is a condominium building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1974 using concrete construction. Unit size and total number of units are not specified in the MLS data provided.
The property offers mountain views and a shared BBQ area. Individual units use window air conditioning. Pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted per the available MLS information. The management company is listed as Unknown in the records provided.
Covered parking is indicated in the MLS details. Buyers should verify monthly maintenance fees, reserve status, specific parking assignments, pet rules, and any other building policies with the managing agent or condominium association. Based on MLS data; prospective purchasers should confirm all details independently.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I found a clear qualitative statement indicating high owner occupancy. However, the remarks do not provide a specific percentage such as '80% owner occupied,' so I cannot responsibly convert that into a numeric value.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to the number of elevators, including explicit counts and vague terms like 'multiple elevators.' None were mentioned, so there is no basis to assign a number from the remarks alone.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for common-area electricity is weak and looks like an MLS checkbox that may be copied in some listings rather than verified. None of the public remarks reference common electric, hallway/elevator power, or other shared-electricity coverage, so I am not including it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not look like a building-paid amenity here. The strongest clue is the presence of WTRHTR, which usually means hot water is produced in-unit and therefore not included in the maintenance fee. Public remarks do not mention hot water being covered, so this appears to be absent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is strongly supported by the MLS data: all four current listings show SEWER included. The public remarks do not dispute this, and the consistency across listings suggests this is a stable building-level feature rather than a copy/paste error.
Water is strongly supported by the current MLS data, with all four listings showing WATER included in the association fees. The remarks do mention 'paying your own utilities,' but that appears to refer to other utilities since the MLS data is fully consistent on water inclusion.
BBQ is strongly supported across the listings: 4/4 current MLS records mark BBQ as an amenity, and multiple remarks independently mention the feature. Agents specifically describe "BBQ areas" and "a BBQ in the garden area," which looks consistent rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly support private yard space for this building; 0 of 4 mentions say anything like 'private yard,' 'fenced yard,' or 'yard access.' Instead, the remarks consistently reference shared outdoor/common areas such as a garden, BBQ area, and sitting areas, which points away from a true private yard amenity. The lone MLS PRIYAR checkbox appears isolated and unsupported by the public descriptions.
No analysis available
Recreation area is only weakly supported right now: 2/4 MLS listings include RECARE, but none of the provided remarks clearly describe a recreation area, rec deck, or amenity deck. Because the checkbox is present in some listings, it is reasonable to include at moderate confidence, though it could still reflect MLS copy/paste rather than a clearly described shared space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by one clear listing remark: "exterior storage is yours in the lower garage." Across the 4 listings, only 1 explicitly mentions storage and the building-level amenity checkbox is mostly absent, so this looks like a feature that may be present for some units rather than universally advertised. The evidence is enough to include it for buyer search purposes.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community laundry is confirmed across the listings. Two remarks explicitly say "community laundry room" and "There is a community laundry in the building," and the MLS amenities show COMLAU in 4/4 listings. This is consistent evidence across multiple remarks and MLS entries, not just a one-off copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available in this building. All 4 recent listings reference parking, including phrases like "assigned parking space," "secured covered parking stall," and "1 Covered parking spot," which strongly confirms the feature across multiple agents.
Assigned parking is supported by both MLS checkbox data and remarks. The evidence is consistent and includes an explicit mention of an "assigned parking space," so this appears to be a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
Covered parking is strongly established for this building. Every recent listing indicates covered/garage parking, and the remarks consistently confirm it with multiple specific references to a covered stall or garage, matching the prior high-confidence assessment.
I looked for wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed. The remarks clearly indicate assigned/included parking, but they stop short of confirming that the stall is deeded, so I cannot mark it true from these remarks alone.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for parking fee, monthly parking cost, or rental language and found nothing. Parking is described as included/assigned, but no recurring fee is mentioned.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to joining a waitlist for parking or limited parking availability. The remarks only mention an assigned or included stall, with no indication of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS inclusions indicate window-unit air conditioning (ACWIUN) in 2 of 3 current listings for this building, with no listings explicitly contradicting it. Although public remarks do not call out AC, the repeated checkbox use across multiple listings implies that some units have window AC or the building allows it, which is relevant for buyers seeking this feature.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 4 out of 4 current listings marking CONCRE in construction_materials. None of the public remarks contradict this or suggest a recent change, so this appears to be a stable building attribute rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like short-term rental allowed, STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, and TVU, but found none. The phrase "great rental investment" is too general to establish STR permission, so this remains unsupported.
I looked for any sign of a hotel rental pool arrangement such as Hilton pool, Ritz pool, or managed-by-hotel language. The remarks describe a normal residential condo and do not mention any hotel rental program.
I searched for mandatory pool language, such as required participation, cannot opt out, or must be in the rental program. The remarks contain no such references, so there is no evidence of a mandatory hotel pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease end dates, or renewed-through years, but the remarks instead state the property is Fee Simple. That means lease-expiry is not applicable here.
I looked for explicit references to VA approval or VA financing in the remarks and found none. The listing only says "Financing buyers will benefit" and discusses owner occupancy/insurance, which is not VA-specific.
The remarks directly say the financing buyer will benefit from 'a high owner/occupancy and fully insured community.' That is clear public evidence that the HOA provides full building insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for references to fire/life safety evaluation status, FLSE, fire safety certification, and similar language. The remarks do not mention any such status, so there is no affirmative evidence that the building has passed this evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of three listings explicitly notes 'a view of Makiki Heights' from the unit's lanai, which is a clear mountain view. MLS data also shows 1 of 3 listings flagged with a mountain view, and none with 'NONE', supporting that this building offers mountain-view units across multiple agents/listings.
No analysis available
Evidence leans positive for city views: 2 of 4 current MLS listings mark CITY, with no NONE values. The remarks are mostly location-based rather than explicit about the vista, so this looks like a moderate MLS signal rather than strong confirmatory wording.
No analysis available
Garden-oriented evidence is present in multiple remarks, including 'garden and BBQ areas' and 'beautiful landscaping' in the garden area. While only 1 of 4 current MLS listings tags GARDEN, the repeated references suggest the building offers at least some garden-facing units or courtyard views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.