
1555 Pohaku
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1555 Pohaku
Building Overview
1555 Pohaku in Kalihi-Palama, a 1975 concrete building with assigned parking and an on-site resident manager.

About 1555 Pohaku
1555 Pohaku is located in the Kalihi-Palama neighborhood and was built in 1975. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the building provides an on-site resident manager and allows pets. Short-term rentals are not permitted per the available listings. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS records.
Assigned parking is noted for the building. Additional details commonly considered by buyers—such as maintenance fees, special assessments, exact parking counts, and management contact information—are not included in the MLS data and should be verified independently.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Public remarks indicate the building is 'highly' or has a 'high owner-occupancy rate', but no explicit percentage is provided. Per numeric rules, cannot assign a percent without an explicit figure, so the numeric value remains unknown.
Multiple public remarks explicitly mention an elevator or elevator access, confirming the building has elevator service, but none provide a specific number. Per rules, do not guess a numeric count without an explicit number in remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
13 of 20 recent MLS listings flag OTCOEX (common-area electricity) in association_fee_includes, giving a moderate building-level signal. Public remarks do not mention common electric or building power, and the evidence appears to be primarily from MLS checkbox data (possible agent copy/paste), so confidence is implied rather than explicitly confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/20) mark HOTWAT as included in association fees, while 10/20 list WTRHTR (water heater) and multiple public remarks reference unit water heaters ('brand new ... water heater', 'On Demand water heater'), indicating hot water is supplied at the unit level and not covered by HOA.
No analysis available
No analysis available
A very large majority (19/20) of recent MLS listings list SEWER as included in association fees. Public remarks do not contradict this and the MLS signal is strong across multiple listings, so sewer included is highly supported.
All recent MLS listings (20/20) flag WATER as included in association fees, a very strong building-level signal. Public remarks do not contradict and the consistent MLS data across multiple agents supports high confidence that water is included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks were scanned for any references to surfboard storage, including terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', or 'bike and surfboard storage'. While some listings mention general storage such as storage lockers and closets, none specifically indicate dedicated surfboard storage facilities. In the absence of explicit evidence, it's assumed the building does not offer surfboard-specific storage.
No analysis available
MLS amenities checkbox lists TRACHU on 10 of 20 listings (historical/high confidence). At least one agent remark explicitly states 'Building includes trash chute, a designated car wash area, and resident manager.' While many agent remarks repeat common building features and some checkbox entries may be copy-paste, the combination of multiple MLS checkboxes and an explicit remark provides strong evidence the building has a trash chute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', or 'saline pool' and found no references. Since a pool of any kind is never mentioned and there is no prior value for this feature, it is assumed there is no salt water pool, though this cannot be confirmed with absolute certainty from the remarks alone.
Strong, consistent evidence that units at 1555 Pohaku offer in-unit laundry: 19 of 20 recent listings reference washer/dryer in the unit with phrases like 'in-unit washer/dryer', 'washer and dryer included', and 'stacked washer and dryer'. Mentions appear across multiple agent remarks and listings (not limited to a single copy/paste), supporting a high-confidence inclusion of this feature.
No analysis available
Searched for terms such as coin-op, coin laundry, card-operated, or paid community laundry and found no mentions. Given only in-unit laundry is described, it is likely there is no paid community laundry setup in the building.
No remarks mention community or shared laundry facilities on every floor, nor phrases like 'laundry on each floor' or 'laundry room on every floor'. Listings consistently highlight in-unit laundry instead, so it is likely there is no community laundry on every floor.
Strong evidence that the building provides parking: numerous remarks reference garage/covered parking stalls and guest or street parking. Public remarks consistently mention parking in many unit ads (building-level and unit-level notes), and MLS checkbox data shows parking present in all 20 listings.
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: current MLS shows 15/20 listings marked ASSIGN and numerous public remarks explicitly state 'assigned parking stall', '1 assigned stall', or 'secure assigned parking.' Multiple agents consistently mention assigned stalls across many unit remarks, indicating this is a building-level offering rather than isolated entries.
Moderate evidence that covered parking is available: 12/20 MLS parking_features include covered/garage codes and multiple public remarks say 'covered parking stall' or 'secured covered parking stall.' While not universally mentioned in every remark (some agents emphasize gated/secured parking without specifying cover), the combination of MLS codes and repeated remarks supports including covered parking.
I looked for explicit wording like 'deeded parking' or 'owned stall' and found none; instead listings repeatedly say 'assigned' or 'secured covered parking stall'. Because deeded ownership is not mentioned, deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for any statement of monthly parking charges or parking rental and found none. Listings describe assigned/covered parking included with units, so there is no evidence of a separate parking fee in the remarks.
No analysis available
Multiple listings emphasize secure access: remarks include 'secured entry', 'secured parking', 'gated building', 'controlled access lobby', and 'keyed entry'. With SECENT checked on many MLS listings (12/20) and repeated agent remarks across units, evidence supports that parking/building access is secured.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for language indicating a parking waitlist and found none. Listings describe assigned and secured stalls (often included), which suggests no advertised waitlist in these remarks.
No analysis available
Remarks consistently describe security in terms of secured/gated entry and keyed access, without mentioning key cards, fobs, card readers, or electronic access systems. Searched for phrases like 'key card access', 'fob access', 'card reader', and 'electronic access' and found none, so card/fob access is likely not present.
No analysis available
Across all provided remarks, security is described via secured entry, gated parking, and a resident manager, but there is no reference to patrol services. Searched for 'security patrol', 'roving security', 'patrol service', and similar terms and found no evidence, so a security patrol is likely not provided.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data is consistent: 19 of 20 recent listings include 'CONCRE' in construction materials, giving strong historical confidence that the building is concrete. None of the public remarks explicitly state otherwise (no 'concrete'/'reinforced concrete' language), but there is also no evidence contradicting the MLS data, so the building is reported as concrete based on the overwhelmingly consistent MLS records.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three listings list SLAB in the construction materials, while most others are silent about the foundation type rather than contradicting it. Combined with the building’s 1975 midrise condo form in Honolulu, this provides moderate, implied evidence that the structure sits on a concrete slab foundation, though MLS usage here appears less consistent than for concrete construction generally.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR-related language and found none. Therefore, based solely on the public remarks, there is no evidence that short-term rentals are permitted in this building.
Because the remarks do not indicate STR is allowed and there is no mention of a hotel rental pool or hotel management program, hotel-pool participation is considered false.
No evidence in the remarks that units must participate in a rental/hotel pool; since STRs are not mentioned, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold', or any 4-digit lease expiry year and found no references. Without explicit leasehold language or a year, the lease expiry is unknown from these remarks.
I searched all public remarks for explicit VA loan language (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA loans accepted') and found none. Therefore there is no evidence the building is VA-approved from the provided remarks.
Remarks reference hurricane coverage specifically ('maintenance fees include hurricane coverage' / 'hurricane insured building') but do not state that the HOA provides full/walls-in building insurance. Without explicit 'fully insured' language, set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No public remarks reference a passed fire/life safety evaluation or equivalent certification. In the absence of any mention and with no current confirmed value, marked false with medium confidence (absence of evidence).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple sources indicate city views: 6 of 20 current MLS view_descriptions include CITY and public remarks state 'city views' and reference proximity to downtown/central Honolulu. Evidence comes from multiple listings/agents rather than a single outlier, supporting that the building offers city-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
A clear remark in the public remarks states 'Sunrise light fills the living space,' providing an explicit reference to sunrise/morning sun exposure. While MLS view fields previously showed 0/20 SUNRIS, the explicit language in the listing supports including view_sunrise as a building feature (some units receive sunrise/morning sun).
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings describe city views and breezes but do not mention fireworks views from the units or building. Because fireworks views are a strong selling point and would typically be highlighted, the absence of such language suggests this feature is not present.
No analysis available
High-confidence evidence that the building has a resident manager: the MLS checkbox is set on 18 of 20 listings and at least a dozen separate public remarks explicitly state 'on-site resident manager', 'resident manager on site', or 'live-in resident manager'. Multiple agents and listings consistently reference the feature (appearing in many unit descriptions rather than being limited to a single listing), indicating this is a real, building-level amenity rather than a transcription error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.