1448 Young
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1448 Young
Building Overview
1448 Young in Makiki-Tantalus (built 1999); no pets and no short-term rentals allowed, per MLS data.
About 1448 Young
Based on MLS data, 1448 Young is a condominium property located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1999. Size, number of units, and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, 1448 Young does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. No additional amenity or common-area details are provided in the records supplied.
Parking, maintenance fees, assessments and other policies or building specifics are not detailed in the MLS extract. This summary is based solely on the MLS information provided; buyers should verify all building details, rules and fees with the listing agent or condominium management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy information such as '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or any stated percentage, but found nothing. The remarks focus on location, security, parking, and lease details rather than occupancy mix.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as '4 elevators,' 'multiple elevators,' or any stated elevator count, but found none. The remarks mention stairs, secured entry, parking, resident manager, and fire sprinklers, but nothing about elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity appears to be included in the maintenance fee. The MLS currently shows 7 of 9 listings with OTCOEX, which is strong building-level evidence. Public remarks do not mention it explicitly, but the repeated checkbox pattern suggests this is likely correct across multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported as a maintenance-fee inclusion. Across the current MLS data, 0 of 9 listings show HOTWAT, and multiple listings note WTRHTR, which typically means the building is not providing hot water as an included service. Public remarks also do not mention hot water being included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the association fee. The MLS currently shows 8 of 9 listings marking SEWER, which is very strong evidence. Public remarks do not spell it out, but the checkbox data is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fee. The MLS currently shows 8 of 9 listings with WATER checked, which is strong building-level evidence. No public remarks contradict it, and the repeated MLS pattern suggests it is not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks describe a recreation room or related shared entertainment space. Only 1 of 8 listings has RECROO in the MLS amenities, which is too sparse to support the feature and is consistent with copy/paste or checkbox noise rather than a verified building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of six current MLS listings have the TRACHU amenity checked, but none of the public remarks mention a 'trash chute', 'garbage chute', or 'refuse chute'. With no historical confidence data and no remarks confirming installation or existence, the evidence is weak and appears possibly due to agent checkboxing/copy-paste; recommend owner/manager verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports in-unit laundry at the building level. Historical MLS data shows washer/dryer in inclusions for all 9 current listings, and one public remark explicitly says the unit has "in-unit washer and dryer." The repeated MLS pattern plus the direct remark make this a high-confidence feature, likely not just copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present for the building. Across the provided remarks, multiple listings mention "one unassigned parking stall," "one covered parking," "secured garage," and "secured parking." This aligns with the strong MLS pattern showing parking checked in all 9/9 listings.
No analysis available
Covered parking is supported by both the MLS data and the remarks. Several listings explicitly say "1 covered parking," "a covered parking stall in a secured garage," and "1 unassigned parking stall in a secured garage." The evidence is repeated across multiple agents and is consistent with the current checkbox data.
I looked for deeded/owned parking language such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." Instead, the remarks describe the stall as unassigned, which supports parking not being deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for language like "monthly parking charge," "parking fee," or "additional parking cost" and found none. The listings consistently describe parking as included, so there is no evidence of a separate monthly parking fee.
Guest parking is clearly available at the building. Multiple listings mention "ample guest parking," "Lots of Guest Parking," and "ample parking for guests," showing consistent language across different remarks. This is strong corroboration of the MLS guest-parking checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms such as "parking waitlist," "waiting list for parking," or "join the waitlist" and found nothing. The remarks only reference included stalls and guest parking, not any queue system for parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Security guard/service is consistently supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'on duty security,' '24 hr security,' and 'security on duty at entry,' alongside the MLS amenity code SECGUA appearing in 8/9 listings. This looks like a stable building-level feature and not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC appears to be available in some units based on current MLS inclusions: 6 of 9 recent listings show ACWIUN. The public remarks are mostly silent on the exact AC type, with only one listing mentioning "new A/C," so this is supported more by MLS pattern than by explicit agent descriptions. This looks like a building-level feature that may apply to some units rather than a guaranteed feature in every unit.
At least 1 listing explicitly describes the building as having 'concrete construction,' and current MLS data shows 3/8 listings marked CONCRE in construction materials. The mixed checkbox frequency suggests possible copy/paste inconsistency, but the direct remark supports that this is a real building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS property-data shows STEFRA checked on 4 of 7 listings, but 0 of the provided public remarks mention 'steel frame' and one listing explicitly says 'concrete construction.' Evidence for steel frame is weak and inconsistent across agents, so include as possible but with low confidence and recommend direct verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched all remarks for indicators of short-term rental permission, including "STR allowed," "vacation rental," "TVU," and similar policy language, and found none. With no evidence that short-term rentals are permitted, the building is treated as not allowing STR based on the public remarks.
I looked for hotel-pool language such as "hotel rental pool," brand-managed rental programs, or similar references and found none. Since there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, a hotel-pool program cannot be supported here.
I searched for wording like "mandatory hotel pool," "must participate," or "cannot opt out" and found nothing. The remarks also do not indicate any hotel-rental program at all, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The lease expiry year is clearly stated in several listings. The remarks consistently identify the ground lease as expiring in 2064, so that is the extracted lease expiration year.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA-loan approval language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found nothing. With no affirmative mention in any listing, there is no basis to mark the building as VA approved.
I searched for insurance-related phrases such as 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' 'walls-in coverage,' or similar wording, and found none. The remarks discuss leasehold terms, security, and maintenance, but do not address HOA insurance coverage.
Fire sprinklers are strongly confirmed across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'Fire Sprinklers' and 'BUILDING & APT ALREADY HAVE FIRE SPRINKLERS in place,' matching the historical MLS data where 9/9 listings had FIRSPR checked. This appears to be consistent building-level information, not a copy-paste anomaly.
I looked for wording like 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' 'FLSE passed,' 'fire safety certified,' or 'passed fire inspection,' but found no such language. The remarks do mention fire sprinklers, which is not the same as a passed fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks explicitly reference ocean exposure — the first unit description notes an 'open porch offering ... ocean views' and a later remark specifies a unit 'on ocean side of building.' These explicit phrases appear across more than one listing remark from different postings, providing strong evidence the building offers ocean-view units.
Listing remarks explicitly list 'city, mountain, and ocean views' for upper-level units, indicating mountain (mauka/Koolau) views are available in the building. The direct mention in multiple agent remarks supports inclusion as a building-level offering.
No analysis available
City views are strongly supported for this building. One current remark explicitly says an "open porch offering city, mountain, and ocean views," which directly confirms the feature, and the broader listing set repeatedly references the building’s urban/downtown Honolulu setting. The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listing remarks expressly mention 'beautiful sunset views' and reference ocean/west-oriented exposure ('ocean side of building'), indicating sunset views are available from some units. The explicit repeated wording across multiple listings supports a high-confidence inclusion of sunset views for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is confirmed by multiple independent remarks, including 'resident manager,' 'On-site Resident Manager,' and 'on-site resident manager add to the convenience.' The evidence aligns with the historical MLS data where 8/9 listings had RESMAN checked, making this a strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.