
1350 Ala Moana
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1350 Ala Moana
Building Overview
1350 Ala Moana in Ala Moana-Kakaako offers concrete construction with ocean and Diamond Head views, plus a pool and fitness center.

About 1350 Ala Moana
1350 Ala Moana is a residential high-rise located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1968 and is concrete construction with four elevators. Units report views that include ocean, mountain, Diamond Head, and sunsets.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a pool, fitness center, BBQ area, resident manager, concierge, and security guard. Air conditioning in units is noted as split and window types. These features address common resident needs for recreation, security, and basic climate control.
Additional details from MLS indicate parking is available, covered, assigned, and there is guest parking. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, including fees, policies, and current amenity access, with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage, 'majority owner occupied,' or similar wording. No such information was provided, so the owner occupancy rate remains unknown from these remarks.
The public remarks directly confirm the elevator count multiple times, including an explicit reference to four elevators. This matches the current building context, so the value is well supported.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV appears to be included at the building level. Current MLS data shows CABTV in 17 of 20 recent listings, which is highly consistent and likely reflects a copied but accurate building amenity. The public remarks do not mention cable directly, but there is no evidence against it.
Common-area electricity has moderate support from the recent MLS record, with OTCOEX appearing in 12 of 20 listings. The public remarks do not explicitly mention common-area power, but the repeated MLS inclusion suggests the feature is likely present at the building level. Evidence is not overwhelming, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water appears in 11 of 20 recent MLS inclusion lists, which is moderate building-level evidence. The public remarks do not discuss hot water directly, and there is no WTRHTR signal suggesting a contrary correction. Overall this leans true but with only moderate confidence.
Internet inclusion is fairly consistent in the recent MLS data, with INTSER appearing in 14 of 20 listings. The remarks are silent on internet, but the pattern is strong enough to treat this as a likely included building expense. This looks more like a building-level MLS convention than a random agent checkbox.
No analysis available
Sewer is one of the most consistently reported inclusions, appearing in 19 of 20 recent listings. The remarks do not mention sewer explicitly, but the MLS pattern is overwhelming and highly reliable. This is strong building-level evidence.
Water appears to be included in the association fee in 18 of 20 recent listings. The remarks do not directly mention water, but the repeated MLS inclusion makes this a high-confidence building feature. This is consistent across many listings and likely not a copy-paste error.
BBQ/grilling facilities are one of the most consistently mentioned amenities in the remarks, often alongside pool and fitness center. The evidence is uniform across many listings and matches the 20/20 MLS history.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence: a handful of listings (and one that explicitly lists 'club house') and several references to large party/recreation rooms and reservable event/meeting space suggest a clubhouse/community event space exists, though mentions are less widespread than other amenities.
Concierge/front-desk service is supported by multiple current remarks, not just MLS checkbox data. Several listings specifically say "front desk concierge," "concierge front desk," or describe a staffed front desk/service, indicating a true building-level service rather than security alone. The evidence is moderate-to-strong and appears in more than one listing.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Exercise/fitness space is repeatedly confirmed across the remarks, with many listings saying 'exercise room,' 'fitness center,' or 'gym.' This is consistent with the very strong MLS history (19/20) and does not appear to be a one-off or copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Meeting/conference space is supported by multiple explicit mentions, including 'conference room for business meetings' and 'community room.' The repeated references suggest this is a genuine shared amenity rather than a checkbox artifact.
Strong evidence that 1350 Ala Moana offers patio/deck-style outdoor amenities. Across the provided remarks, dozens of listings mention a "lanai," "spacious lanai," "covered lanai," or "open lanai," and at least one listing explicitly includes "patio/deck" in the amenity list. The consistency across many different remarks suggests this is a real shared building feature rather than a copy-paste MLS error.
Walking/jogging paths are repeatedly mentioned across the remarks, including rooftop lawn paths and landscaped grounds. The consistency across many listings and the 12/20 MLS history make this a strong confirmed amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Putting green is directly named in several listings, and some remarks also describe the landscaped lawn in golf-course-like terms. Combined with the MLS history, this is solid evidence that the amenity exists.
The building’s shared recreation area/deck is well supported, with many remarks referencing a 'recreation deck' or 'recreation area.' This is consistent across multiple listings and aligns with the MLS history.
A shared recreation/party room is clearly supported by multiple listings, including explicit phrasing like 'recreation room,' 'party room,' and 'event space.' The repeated references across different remarks make this a reliable building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported at 1350 Ala Moana. Multiple current listings explicitly mention storage in different forms—"tall storage locker," "private storage room," "assigned storage in the basement," "storage locker," and "extra storage"—indicating this is a real and recurring building feature rather than a copy-paste mistake. The evidence is consistent across many agents and appears in both building amenities and unit-specific descriptions.
The remarks clearly confirm surfboard storage/rack facilities. This is strong direct evidence that the building provides surfboard-specific storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute is less frequently mentioned than the major resort amenities, but it does appear explicitly in the current remarks and is supported by the MLS history. The evidence is enough to keep it as a building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/spa amenities are well supported by several explicit mentions of 'jacuzzi,' 'hot tub,' and 'whirlpool spa.' The repeated wording across multiple listings confirms this is a real building feature.
The pool feature is overwhelmingly supported across the listings. Dozens of remarks mention it directly, including 'swimming pool,' 'pool,' 'gated pool,' and 'resort-style amenities include a pool.' This appears consistently across multiple agents and is not just checkbox noise.
The heated pool feature is strongly supported by both the historical MLS data and the current remarks. Multiple listings explicitly describe a 'heated pool,' 'heated swimming pool,' or 'heated pool and Jacuzzi,' indicating this is a real shared amenity rather than a copied checkbox. Evidence is consistent across many remarks and several agents.
I searched for explicit salt-pool language such as "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," or "saline pool" and found none. The pool is clearly mentioned, but its water type is not identified in the public remarks.
Evidence for in-unit laundry is very strong across this building. Multiple listings explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit or a laundry area in the second bathroom, and the current MLS data also shows 17/20 listings with washer/dryer in inclusions. This looks consistent across many agents and is not just a copy-paste checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
I searched for wording such as "coin laundry," "paid laundry," "quarters," "card operated," and similar terms. The remarks only discuss in-unit laundry or laundry/storage space, so there is no evidence that community laundry exists or requires payment.
I looked for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or similar floor-by-floor laundry references and found none. The public remarks instead describe in-unit washer/dryer and a laundry area inside a unit, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
All 20 recent MLS records include parking flags and numerous remarks explicitly state parking is provided (examples: "1 covered parking stall", "spacious parking in shade"). Evidence is consistent across many listings and agents, indicating strong building-level parking availability.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listing history and current remarks. Multiple listings explicitly say '1 assigned parking stall,' 'assigned parking,' 'dedicated parking stall,' or 'deeded/assigned storage and parking,' and this appears consistently across different agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error. The building should be treated as offering assigned/reserved parking.
Covered parking is extremely well supported across the listing history and current remarks. Numerous listings explicitly state 'covered parking stall,' 'one covered parking stall,' '1 covered parking spot,' or otherwise identify parking on a parking level/first floor, indicating the building offers covered stalls. Evidence is strong and consistent across many listings and agents.
I looked for phrases like deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed, or deeded stall and did not find them. The listings consistently describe assigned or covered parking instead, which does not establish deeded ownership.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking charge, parking rental, additional parking cost, or a stated fee, but none were listed. The remarks mention parking stalls and assignment, but not any separate parking fee.
Guest parking appears to be an available building feature, though it is documented less consistently than assigned or covered parking. Several remarks explicitly mention 'guest parking,' which supports the MLS guest-parking flag even if not every listing includes it. Overall confidence is solid but lower than the other parking features.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist, waiting list, or join-list language and found nothing. The remarks suggest parking is handled through assigned stalls, not a waitlist system.
No analysis available
The listings support electronic/controlled entry security, even though they do not always say "key card" verbatim. Mentions of biometric access entry systems and secured access are strong evidence for card/fob-style security.
Security guard service is strongly supported for 1350 Ala Moana. Across many current listings, remarks explicitly mention "24/7 security staff," "24-hour security," "24-hour front desk/security staff," "security/concierge," and "security guard on-site." This is consistent with the historical MLS pattern (18/20 listings with SECGUA) and appears to be a repeated building-level amenity rather than isolated agent copy-paste.
I looked for direct references to security patrol, roving security, or patrolled-building language and found none. The building is clearly secured, but the remarks only support staffed security rather than patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is supported by multiple current listing remarks and historical MLS data. At least 2-3 listings explicitly mention it with phrases such as "newly installed split AC unit" and "efficient split AC in both bedrooms and living room," while the MLS history shows ACSPL appearing in 6/20 listings. The evidence appears to be real building-level availability rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Window air conditioning is strongly supported for this building. Multiple current remarks explicitly mention 'window A/C units' or 'new window AC,' and the historical MLS checkbox data aligns with 13/20 listings showing ACWIUN. The evidence is consistent across many listings and agents, so this feature should be included.
Concrete construction is strongly supported at the building level. Current MLS data shows 19 of 20 listings with CONCRE, and none of the remarks contradict it; the repeated descriptions of this as an iconic high-rise/landmark condo fit a concrete tower. This appears to be stable building-level information rather than copy-paste noise.
Double wall construction is not substantiated by the listing remarks and is only present in 2 of 20 current MLS records. The absence of any explicit references to double-wall construction across many remarks suggests this is likely an unreliable MLS checkbox rather than a verified building attribute.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco is not supported by the public remarks, which repeatedly focus on views, amenities, and location rather than construction type. With only 3 of 20 listings checking MASSTU and no explicit mention in the remarks, this looks like inconsistent MLS checkbox data rather than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction has only limited support in the current MLS data, with 4 of 20 listings marked ABOGRO. None of the public remarks explicitly describe the building as above-ground, so this appears to be weak or inconsistent agent-entered data rather than something clearly confirmed in remarks. Confidence is therefore modest.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks directly indicate a six-month minimum rental term, which is strong evidence that short-term rentals are prohibited. I also looked for STR/TVU/NUC language and found no contrary approval language.
I searched for hotel pool, hotel rental program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or managed-by-hotel wording and found none. Because the building appears not to allow short-term rentals, a hotel pool arrangement is also not supported.
I looked for mandatory participation, required rental program, cannot opt out, or must rent language and found nothing. Since the remarks also do not show a hotel pool program, there is no basis to mark mandatory participation as true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold/ground-lease language such as lease expires, leasehold, ground lease, renewed through, or an expiry year, but found no specific year. The remarks do not provide enough information to determine a lease expiration date.
The public remarks directly identify the building as VA-approved, which indicates VA financing is accepted. This is a building-level statement and is consistent across the listings.
I looked for insurance-related phrases such as fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or fully covered building insurance. The remarks do not mention HOA insurance coverage, so there is no evidence to mark this as true.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit fire/life safety compliance language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, and passed fire inspection. Nothing in the public remarks indicated that the building has passed such an evaluation, so this remains unconfirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are confirmed by a large share of the current remarks, with roughly 30+ listings mentioning some form of ocean view language such as “Pacific Ocean,” “ocean views,” and “sparkling blue-green ocean.” The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and unit stacks, so this appears to be a genuine building-level feature rather than copy-paste noise.
Mountain views are supported by multiple current listings, with several remarks explicitly stating mountain or Ko’olau views and others pairing them with ocean/city views. This is strong building-level evidence and aligns with the existing MLS pattern.
Diamond Head views are very strongly confirmed, with many listings specifically saying “Diamond Head view,” “Diamond Head side,” or “views of Diamond Head.” The repetition across different units and agents makes this highly reliable at the building level.
City views are well supported, with many listings referring to “city views,” “night city view,” “city lights,” and “cityscape.” The feature appears consistently across multiple stacks and is clearly not an isolated one-off remark.
Coastline views appear to be a real feature of the building, though less consistently labeled than ocean or city views. Multiple remarks describe 'coastal views,' 'Ala Moana Beach Park' vistas, and front-row oceanfront outlooks, supporting inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several remarks note marina/harbor outlooks, including 'views of Diamond Head, Ala Wai Yacht Harbor,' 'view of Pacific Ocean, Diamond Head, Yacht Harbor,' 'stunning Pacific Ocean, Beach Park, Boat Harbor...views,' and a 'preferred "03 stack" unit [with] stunning views of the ocean and marina.' These repeated references across different stacks confirm that the building offers units with marina/harbor views.
Sunrise views are supported by several explicit remarks, including phrases like “captivating sunrises,” “beautiful sunrise,” and “the morning sun greets you.” Evidence is fewer than for ocean or Diamond Head, but it is still strong and consistent enough to confirm the feature.
Sunset views are supported by both MLS data and remarks. Several listings explicitly advertise 'sunset views' and 'enjoy spectacular sunsets,' with some references tied to west-facing or sunset-side units, indicating a real building feature.
No analysis available
The listings repeatedly confirm fireworks views from units and lanais, including references to Friday night fireworks from the comfort of the lanai. This is strong, consistent evidence that the building offers fireworks views from residences.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly supports an on-site resident manager. Historical MLS data shows 17 of 20 listings with RESMAN, and current remarks explicitly say "Resident Manager located on property." Multiple listings also mention staffed front desk, security, concierge, and helpful building staff, which reinforces that this is a real building-level amenity rather than a copy-paste checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.