1133 Waimanu
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1133 Waimanu
Building Overview
1133 Waimanu in Ala Moana-Kakaako: 1995 concrete building with ocean views, BBQ area and on-site resident manager.
About 1133 Waimanu
Based on MLS data, 1133 Waimanu is a concrete residential building located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood, built in 1995. Unit size and total number of units are not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the building offers ocean views and on-site amenities that include a BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. The building has three elevators and air conditioning options listed as split and window units.
Parking is listed as available and covered, with guest parking noted. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS data. The management company is listed as unknown. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the seller, association, or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and descriptive terms indicating the owner-occupancy level, but found none. Because the remarks do not provide a usable figure, this remains unknown.
The public remarks directly confirm that the building has three elevators. This matches the current value, so it should be kept with very high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is well corroborated across the listings. At least one public remark explicitly says "Sewer, water, cable TV, and high-speed internet included in the maintenance fee," matching the MLS CABTV checkboxes and suggesting this is a true building-wide fee inclusion rather than a copy-paste error.
There is moderate MLS support for common-area electricity being included, with 11 of 20 current listings marked OTCOEX. The public remarks describe building amenities and maintenance, but do not explicitly mention common electric, so this is supported more by MLS pattern than by direct text confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The evidence points away from hot water being included: only 2 of 20 current MLS entries show HOTWAT, while 14 of 20 include WTRHTR, which is a strong sign units have individual water heaters. Multiple remarks mention a new or replaced water heater, reinforcing that this is likely a unit-level system rather than a fee-covered building service.
Internet inclusion is directly supported by the MLS pattern and the remarks. One remark explicitly states "Sewer, water, cable TV, and high-speed internet included in the maintenance fee," which is strong, building-level confirmation consistent with the current MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
Sewer is repeatedly confirmed across the listings. The current MLS data shows 18 of 20 entries including SEWER, and at least one remark directly states it is included in the maintenance fee, making this a very high-confidence building feature.
Water inclusion is strongly corroborated by both MLS and public remarks. The current MLS data shows 18 of 20 listings with WATER, and remarks explicitly say "water" is included in the maintenance fee, so this appears to be a consistent building-level inclusion.
Strong evidence: 15 of 20 current MLS listings flag BBQ and numerous public remarks explicitly state 'BBQ area' or 'BBQ areas.' Mentions appear across many agent remarks (e.g., 'BBQ area', 'BBQ areas'), indicating a shared building barbecue/grilling facility rather than an isolated or single-unit feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clear evidence: 9 of 20 MLS listings include car wash and several public remarks explicitly advertise 'CAR WASH AREA available!' The repeated, explicit phrasing in agent remarks indicates a shared car wash amenity in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention a dog park, dog run, pet area, or dog exercise area. Several listings describe other amenities like a private yard, recreation areas, BBQ areas, and landscaped green spaces, but those are not the same as a dedicated dog park. The lone DGPRK checkbox in current MLS data is not supported by the remarks and looks like possible copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is consistently described as having a meeting room or similar community space. Remarks include 'meeting room,' 'meeting and rec room,' and 'party/meeting facilities,' indicating this is a real shared amenity rather than an unchecked MLS placeholder.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings describe a 'recreation area' directly, including one that says 'manicured park like recreation areas' and another that notes 'recreation area, private yard.' The repetition across different remarks supports this as a shared building amenity, not a copy-paste anomaly.
The building’s remarks consistently reference a recreation room: multiple listings say 'recreation room' or 'rec room,' and several also group it with other amenities like BBQ areas and guest parking. This appears to be stable building-level amenity information rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for surfboard storage-related terms, including surf storage and board storage. Nothing in the public remarks indicates dedicated surfboard storage facilities. Since there is no evidence, this feature is marked false based on the available remarks.
No analysis available
Current MLS data strongly indicates a trash chute system, with 19 of 20 listings flagged for TRACHU. Public remarks in the provided set do not mention trash chutes, but the MLS consistency is strong enough to retain this feature with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for pool references and saltwater/saline pool wording. There were no pool mentions in the remarks, and the current building context confirms the building has no pool. Therefore this feature is confidently false.
This feature is strongly supported: current MLS data shows washer/dryer included in all 20 of 20 listings. Public remarks repeatedly confirm it across many listings with phrases like "in-unit washer and dryer," "washer and dryer are included in the apartment," and references to washer/dryer replacements or new installations. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for evidence that community laundry is pay-per-use, such as coin-op or card-operated laundry. The remarks do not mention any paid laundry system. Some listings mention in-unit washer/dryer, which further reduces the likelihood of community paid laundry being a building feature.
I searched the public remarks for references to laundry facilities on every floor, including phrases like 'laundry on each floor' and 'laundry room on every floor.' None were found. The listings instead mention in-unit washer/dryer in several places, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the building: 20/20 MLS entries include parking-related features. Public remarks consistently mention "one parking," "one secured garage parking stall," "one unassigned parking stall," and even a rentable second stall, indicating parking is a standard building feature.
No analysis available
Covered parking is well supported by both MLS coding and remarks. Several listings specifically describe a "secured garage parking stall" or similar garage-based parking, matching the high-frequency covered parking data in the MLS.
The remarks repeatedly describe the stall as unassigned, which is inconsistent with deeded/owned parking. The ability to rent a second stall through lottery also supports that parking is not deeded to the unit.
No analysis available
The remarks provide a clear monthly parking cost for an additional stall. I used the stated $65 per month because it is directly specified in the listing text.
Guest parking is clearly available in the building. Remarks repeatedly reference "guest parking" and "ample visitor parkings," and MLS data confirms guest parking in a substantial portion of listings, supporting this as a shared building feature.
Secured entry is supported by both MLS coding and multiple remarks. Listings describe the building as having "Secured entry," "gated access," and a "secure building" with 24-hour security, indicating controlled access is part of the property setup.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist language and found a direct reference to obtaining a second stall through lottery. That is strong evidence that additional parking is controlled through a waitlist-like system.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit card/fob access language such as key card entry, fob access, or electronic card readers. The public remarks mention secured entry and gated access, but that does not confirm card-based access control. Without an explicit reference, this feature is treated as absent from the remarks.
Strong building-level evidence supports security guard service. At least 7–10 separate remarks explicitly mention '24-hour security,' 'security patrol,' 'security,' or 'on-site security/resident manager,' and the MLS amenities data shows 14 of 20 listings include SECGUA. The consistency across multiple listings suggests this is not just copy-paste noise.
I found direct evidence of security patrol service in the public remarks. Multiple listings also describe 24-hour security, which supports the building having active patrol/security presence. This is a strong positive match for the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple agent remarks explicitly reference split/ductless systems — at least three distinct listings state phrases like 'split AC', 'split air conditioning', or 'split-system A/C'. Historical MLS checkbox data also recorded ACSPL in multiple prior listings (6 of 19) and remains present in current MLS inclusions (7 of 20). Evidence is consistent across several agents and listings that some units in the building have split (ductless) AC.
13 of 20 current MLS listings include the ACWIUN checkbox indicating window A/C, but none of the public remarks explicitly say 'window AC' or 'window unit'. Multiple listings explicitly cite 'split AC' or 'split-system A/C', so evidence for window units is mixed: strong in MLS checkbox data but not corroborated in agent remarks, yielding moderate confidence that some units have window A/C.
Strong building-level evidence supports concrete construction. Across the provided listings, 19 of 20 current MLS entries indicate CONCRE, and the remarks repeatedly describe the same established condo without any contradictory material description. This looks like consistent MLS data rather than a one-off agent copy/paste issue.
There is no public-remark support for double-wall construction, and the MLS signal is relatively weak at 7 of 20 listings. Because the feature is not described in remarks and the checkbox pattern is inconsistent, this appears more likely to be unreliable MLS carryover than a confirmed building trait.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings in the provided remarks explicitly describe the building as above-ground constructed, and the MLS support is minimal at 4 of 20 entries. This weak, inconsistent pattern suggests the feature is probably not reliably attributable to the building.
Limited MLS evidence: 2 of 20 listings list brick construction, but no public remarks reference 'brick' or 'brick-and-mortar'. This suggests some listings/units might be recorded as brick (or agents checked the box), but the signal is weak and may reflect inconsistent agent entry or specific units.
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental terms such as STR permitted, TVU, NUC, vacation rental, or minimum-stay rules and found nothing. With no supportive remarks, short-term rentals are not evidenced here.
I looked for hotel pool references like hotel rental program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or managed-by-hotel language and found none. Since short-term rental allowance is also not indicated, this remains false.
I searched for evidence that unit owners must participate in a rental pool and found nothing. There is also no indication that the building has any hotel-style rental pool at all, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as 'lease expires', 'ground lease ends', or a specific expiry year and found nothing. The remarks do not indicate that this is a leasehold property, so there is no lease expiry year to extract.
I searched the public remarks for VA loan approval language and found none. With no evidence that the building is VA approved, the safest read from the remarks is false.
There are multiple explicit references indicating the building is fully insured. The language is strong and repeated, so this feature is confirmed with high confidence.
Fire sprinklers are strongly supported across the listing set. Multiple remarks explicitly say the building is "equipped with FIRE SPRINKLER" and "outfitted with fire sprinklers," which aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS data. This appears to be consistent building-level information rather than copy-paste noise.
I searched the remarks for phrases such as FLSE passed, fire life safety evaluation passed, passed fire inspection, and fire safety certified. The only related language found was that the building is equipped with fire sprinklers, which does not confirm a passed evaluation, so this remains unverified and is treated as false/no evidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Historical confidence is high and current evidence confirms ocean views for some units. The MLS summary shows 2 of 20 listings with OCEAN in view_descriptions, and multiple agent remarks here explicitly state phrases like 'ocean view', 'stunning ocean and mountain views', and 'picture perfect ocean views', indicating several units offer ocean-facing sightlines.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical confidence is high and present remarks corroborate city views in the building. The MLS summary shows 5 of 20 listings with CITY in view_descriptions, and several agent remarks here explicitly mention 'views of the city', 'urban district', and 'city living', confirming that some units provide city/urban vistas.
Across 17 listings, including several that emphasize views, none refer to 'coastline', 'shoreline', or similar terms, and 0/17 MLS view_descriptions check a coastline-related view. Descriptions focus instead on ocean, city, and mountain views, suggesting this building is not marketed as having notable coastline views. Given this consistent absence, coastline view is not treated as a building-level feature.
Multiple listings for 1133 Waimanu reference garden or landscaped outlooks—current remarks include explicit phrases like 'Relax in your living room with garden view' and 'landscaped green spaces' / 'manicured park like recreation areas'. MLS view_descriptions also show GARDEN for some units (2 of 19), and several agents independently describe private yard/park-like common areas, indicating the building offers garden views for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited but direct evidence for sunset views: 1 of 20 current listings is tagged SUNSET in the view description. Most remarks mention ocean, mountain, city, treetop, or breezy/cooler-side views instead, so this appears to be a unit-specific feature rather than something uniformly described across all listings.
No analysis available
I searched for references to viewing Friday night fireworks from the building or from unit lanais. The remarks mention ocean, mountain, city, and treetop views, plus proximity to Ala Moana and the beach, but nothing about fireworks views. Proximity to fireworks locations is not enough to confirm this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager status is very well supported. Several listings explicitly state "resident manager onsite," "resident manager," or "on-site manager," matching the prior high-confidence MLS data. The repetition across many remarks makes this look like a stable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.