1133 Waimanu
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1133 Waimanu
Building Overview
1133 Waimanu in Ala Moana-Kakaako: 1995 concrete building with ocean views, BBQ area and on-site resident manager.
About 1133 Waimanu
Based on MLS data, 1133 Waimanu is a concrete residential building located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood, built in 1995. Unit size and total number of units are not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the building offers ocean views and on-site amenities that include a BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. The building has three elevators and air conditioning options listed as split and window units.
Parking is listed as available and covered, with guest parking noted. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the MLS data. The management company is listed as unknown. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the seller, association, or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and descriptive phrases such as "majority owner occupied" or "80% owner occupied," but found none. Because the remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy figure or reliable proxy, this remains unknown.
The remarks directly confirm the building has three elevators, matching the current value. No conflicting evidence appears anywhere in the listings, so this should be retained with very high confidence.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is well corroborated across the listings. At least one public remark explicitly says "Sewer, water, cable TV, and high-speed internet included in the maintenance fee," matching the MLS CABTV checkboxes and suggesting this is a true building-wide fee inclusion rather than a copy-paste error.
There is moderate MLS support for common-area electricity being included, with 11 of 20 current listings marked OTCOEX. The public remarks describe building amenities and maintenance, but do not explicitly mention common electric, so this is supported more by MLS pattern than by direct text confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The evidence leans against maintenance fees including hot water. Only 2 of 20 current MLS entries show HOTWAT, while 14 of 20 list WTRHTR, and several remarks mention a water heater being replaced or included in the unit. There are no public remarks explicitly stating that hot water is included in the HOA/maintenance fee, so the MLS checkbox appears more likely to be a copy/paste artifact than a building-wide amenity.
Internet inclusion is directly supported by the MLS pattern and the remarks. One remark explicitly states "Sewer, water, cable TV, and high-speed internet included in the maintenance fee," which is strong, building-level confirmation consistent with the current MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
Sewer is repeatedly confirmed across the listings. The current MLS data shows 18 of 20 entries including SEWER, and at least one remark directly states it is included in the maintenance fee, making this a very high-confidence building feature.
Water inclusion is strongly corroborated by both MLS and public remarks. The current MLS data shows 18 of 20 listings with WATER, and remarks explicitly say "water" is included in the maintenance fee, so this appears to be a consistent building-level inclusion.
Multiple listings explicitly reference BBQ amenities, including phrases like 'bbq area' and 'BBQ area' across different remarks. The feature appears repeatedly in the current MLS data and is reinforced by public remarks from multiple agents, suggesting it is a real shared building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is very direct evidence for car wash facilities: several remarks explicitly advertise 'CAR WASH AREA available!' This is one of the clearest amenity mentions in the dataset and strongly supports the feature being present in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention a dog park, dog run, pet area, or dog exercise area. Several listings describe other amenities like a private yard, recreation areas, BBQ areas, and landscaped green spaces, but those are not the same as a dedicated dog park. The lone DGPRK checkbox in current MLS data is not supported by the remarks and looks like possible copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building is repeatedly described as having a meeting room, with remarks including 'meeting room,' 'meeting and rec room,' and 'party/meeting facilities.' This strong cross-listing consistency indicates a real common amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings explicitly mention a "private yard" as part of the building amenities, including secured entry, gated access, recreation room, and 24-hour security. This is repeated across several remarks, so the evidence supports that the building offers private yard space for residents. No remarks contradict it, and the MLS amenity tag aligns with the listing text.
No analysis available
Several remarks directly reference a recreation area, including one describing 'manicured park like recreation areas' and another noting 'recreation area' among the amenities. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and aligns with the MLS amenity flag.
The building is consistently described as having a recreation room, with multiple remarks using the exact phrase 'recreation room' and one referring to 'meeting and rec room.' The repeated mentions across listings support this as a legitimate shared amenity rather than a checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and similar amenity language. The remarks do not mention any dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
The MLS data overwhelmingly supports a trash chute system, with 19 of 20 listings flagged for TRACHU. No current public remarks mention it, but the checkbox evidence is so strong that this should be treated as a real building feature unless later contradicted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I checked for any pool references and for saltwater/saline pool wording. There is no evidence of a pool in the remarks, and the current building context confirms the building does not have a pool.
Evidence is very strong that the building offers in-unit laundry. Multiple listings explicitly mention washer/dryer in the unit, including updates like "replaced in 2021" and "brand new washer/dryer installed in August 2023," showing this is not a copy-paste anomaly. Historical MLS data also showed washer/dryer included in all 20 of 20 listings, so this feature is well supported across agents and time.
No analysis available
I looked for coin-op, card-operated, paid laundry, or laundry fee language. The remarks do not mention any community laundry system at all, so there is no public evidence that laundry requires payment.
I searched for references to laundry on every floor, floor-by-floor laundry rooms, or similar wording. The public remarks only mention in-unit washer/dryer in some listings and do not describe any community laundry facilities on each floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the building: 20/20 MLS entries include parking-related features. Public remarks consistently mention "one parking," "one secured garage parking stall," "one unassigned parking stall," and even a rentable second stall, indicating parking is a standard building feature.
No analysis available
Covered parking is strongly supported across the remarks, with multiple listings stating "one secured garage parking stall" or similar language. This aligns with the historically high MLS confidence, and the repeated references suggest this is a consistent building feature rather than a one-off agent error.
The remarks repeatedly describe the parking stall as unassigned, which is inconsistent with deeded/owned parking. I found no indication that the parking stall is deeded with the unit.
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly state a monthly cost of $65 for an additional parking stall. Because the price is directly specified, this is the best value to use for parking fee.
Guest parking is clearly available in the building. Several listings explicitly say "guest parking," "ample guest parking," and "ample visitor parkings," appearing across multiple agents and listing versions, which makes the evidence very strong and consistent.
Secured entry is supported by both MLS coding and multiple remarks. Listings describe the building as having "Secured entry," "gated access," and a "secure building" with 24-hour security, indicating controlled access is part of the property setup.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks indicate additional parking is obtained through a lottery, which functions as a waitlist-style allocation system. That is strong evidence that parking is not freely available on demand.
No analysis available
I searched for key card, fob, card reader, or electronic access terminology. The building is described as secured with gated access and 24-hour security, but nothing specifically indicates card-based entry.
Strong, repeated building-level evidence supports security guard service. Multiple listings explicitly mention "24-hour security" or "24 hour security," and one remark adds "security patrol," with several others describing the building as secure or secured. The consistency across many remarks suggests this is a real shared amenity, not just a copy-paste artifact.
The public remarks directly mention security patrol service, and other listings also describe 24-hour security. This is strong evidence that the building has patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports split AC. At least 4 listings explicitly mention it with phrases such as "split AC," "split air conditioning," and "split-system A/C," which is consistent with the prior high-confidence history. The repeated mentions across different remarks suggest this is not a one-off copy-paste error.
13 of 20 current MLS listings include the ACWIUN checkbox indicating window A/C, but none of the public remarks explicitly say 'window AC' or 'window unit'. Multiple listings explicitly cite 'split AC' or 'split-system A/C', so evidence for window units is mixed: strong in MLS checkbox data but not corroborated in agent remarks, yielding moderate confidence that some units have window A/C.
Strong building-level evidence supports concrete construction. Across the current MLS listings, 19 of 20 entries indicate CONCRE in construction_materials, and the public remarks do not suggest any alternative construction type. This appears to be consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off entry.
There is no public-remark support for double-wall construction, and the MLS signal is relatively weak at 7 of 20 listings. Because the feature is not described in remarks and the checkbox pattern is inconsistent, this appears more likely to be unreliable MLS carryover than a confirmed building trait.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings in the provided remarks explicitly describe the building as above-ground constructed, and the MLS support is minimal at 4 of 20 entries. This weak, inconsistent pattern suggests the feature is probably not reliably attributable to the building.
Limited MLS evidence: 2 of 20 listings list brick construction, but no public remarks reference 'brick' or 'brick-and-mortar'. This suggests some listings/units might be recorded as brick (or agents checked the box), but the signal is weak and may reflect inconsistent agent entry or specific units.
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental terms such as STR permitted, TVU, NUC, vacation rental, or minimum-stay rules and found none. There is no public remark evidence that short-term rentals are allowed in this building.
I looked for hotel rental pool language such as hotel program, managed by hotel, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar references and found nothing. With no evidence of short-term rental allowance either, this must remain false.
I searched for signs of a required rental pool, such as mandatory participation or no opt-out language, and found none. There is also no evidence that the building has any hotel-style rental pool program.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease ends,' 'leasehold,' or a specific expiry year and found nothing. The remarks do not provide any lease expiry year, so this remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for VA approval language such as 'VA approved,' 'VA financing,' or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. With no public evidence that this building is VA loan approved, the feature is best treated as not established from the remarks.
Multiple listings directly state the building is fully insured, including the exact phrases "100%INSURED" and "fully insured." This is strong repeated evidence, so the feature is confirmed with very high confidence.
Fire sprinklers are strongly supported across the listing set. At least 3-4 remarks explicitly mention "fire sprinkler system," "equipped with FIRE SPRINKLER," or "outfitted with fire sprinklers," which aligns with the existing high-confidence MLS data. The evidence appears consistent rather than a copy-paste mistake.
I searched the remarks for explicit fire/life safety pass language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection, but found none. The presence of fire sprinklers does not confirm a passed evaluation, so this remains unverified and is treated as false due to lack of supporting mention.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across multiple listings and appear in remarks from several different agents, not just a single copy-paste description. Current remarks mention ocean views in at least 6 listings, and the MLS data also shows 6/20 listings with OCEAN and only 1/20 with NONE, confirming this as a real building-level offering for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are repeatedly referenced in current remarks and align with the MLS evidence showing 12/20 listings with CITY and only 1/20 with NONE. The wording varies across agents, but the recurring references to city/urban views make this a strong confirmed feature for the building.
Across 17 listings, including several that emphasize views, none refer to 'coastline', 'shoreline', or similar terms, and 0/17 MLS view_descriptions check a coastline-related view. Descriptions focus instead on ocean, city, and mountain views, suggesting this building is not marketed as having notable coastline views. Given this consistent absence, coastline view is not treated as a building-level feature.
Garden/outdoor landscaped views are supported by at least one explicit "garden view" remark plus multiple references to landscaped green spaces, private yard, and park-like recreation areas. While not as frequently mentioned as ocean or city views, the evidence is consistent with the MLS data showing 6/20 listings with GARDEN and supports inclusion for buyers seeking garden-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited but direct evidence for sunset views: 1 of 20 current listings is tagged SUNSET in the view description. Most remarks mention ocean, mountain, city, treetop, or breezy/cooler-side views instead, so this appears to be a unit-specific feature rather than something uniformly described across all listings.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit views of Friday night fireworks from the building or from unit lanais. The remarks mention ocean, mountain, city, and treetop views, but nothing about fireworks visibility from units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager status is very well supported in the remarks. Multiple listings mention "resident manager onsite" or simply "resident manager," often alongside other building amenities like security, guest parking, and meeting rooms. This is consistent across the dataset and does not look like an isolated or unreliable entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.