1111 Wilder
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1111 Wilder
Building Overview
1111 Wilder in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building (1970) with pool, split A/C, and assigned parking.
About 1111 Wilder
1111 Wilder is a condominium property located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1970 and is of concrete construction. Unit size, number of floors, and other building dimensions are not provided in the MLS data.
Key on-site features include a pool for residents and split air conditioning in units where noted. Pets are allowed at this property per the MLS information. No short-term rentals are permitted according to the available data.
Parking is available and assigned. The MLS listing indicates the management company is unknown. Based on MLS data and analysis; buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy language such as a percentage, 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied,' and found no such statement. The remarks emphasize a boutique feel and only two units per floor, but that is not a substitute for actual occupancy data. With no direct evidence, the owner-occupancy rate is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator counts such as '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' or 'multiple elevators,' but found nothing. The listings repeatedly describe the building as boutique and only two units per floor, but that does not confirm elevator count. Without direct mention, the elevator number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included for this building based on current MLS data, with 11 of 13 listings marking OTCOEX. The public remarks are silent on this item, which suggests the MLS pattern may be partly copy-paste, but the majority still leans true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is somewhat supported by the MLS data, with 9 of 13 current listings checking HOTWAT. There is also 1 listing with WTRHTR, which introduces some ambiguity, and none of the public remarks explicitly confirm hot water service. Overall the evidence leans true but is not strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included at the building level, with all 13 current MLS listings checking SEWER. The remarks are silent, but the uniformity across listings makes this very high-confidence and unlikely to be a copy-paste error.
Water is consistently marked as included across all 13 current MLS listings. Although the public remarks do not call it out directly, the complete MLS agreement indicates this is a reliable building-level expense included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage units/extra storage are supported by several listings for this building. At least 3 remarks explicitly reference it, including phrases like 'extra storage,' 'generous storage,' and 'storage in a secured building,' which suggests this is not just a one-off copy-paste error. Current MLS data also shows storage appearing in both building amenities and unit features for 4/13 listings, reinforcing that the feature is available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing remarks mention a trash chute system, garbage chute, or refuse chute. The only signal is a small number of TRACHU amenity checkboxes in MLS data, which is weak compared with the complete absence of supporting remarks and suggests the amenity may have been entered incorrectly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool feature is strongly supported: 13/13 current MLS listings include pool in amenities, and multiple public remarks explicitly describe a "swimming pool," "community pool," or "sparkling swimming pool." The repeated mention across many listings suggests this is a shared building amenity, not a one-off agent error or copy-paste mistake.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported. Multiple remarks explicitly state "has an in-unit washer/dryer," "in-unit laundry," "washer and dryer in-unit," and "full size washer & dryer." Combined with current MLS inclusions showing washer/dryer in all 13/13 listings, this appears to be a consistent building feature rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available at the building. Across the provided remarks, multiple listings explicitly mention parking, including 'one assigned parking stall,' 'one reserved parking stall,' 'deeded parking,' and '1 covered parking.' The evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off checkbox.
Assigned or reserved parking is strongly supported for this building. Several remarks explicitly describe assigned, reserved, deeded, or covered stalls, aligning with the MLS checkbox pattern. This appears to be a consistent building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
Evidence supports covered parking being available: MLS flags COVERE/CO1/CO2/GARAGE on 5 of 11 listings and multiple remarks state '1 covered parking', '1 covered parking stall', or 'covered, close to entrance for convenience'. These consistent, explicit mentions across listings indicate covered parking is offered.
The listings provide direct evidence that parking is deeded, including an explicit mention of "deeded parking." Other remarks describing assigned, reserved, or close-to-entry stalls support that interpretation.
No analysis available
I looked for monthly parking fees, rental charges, or any extra parking cost language, but found none. The remarks only mention assigned, reserved, covered, or deeded parking without any fee information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist language such as a waiting list or join-the-waitlist requirement, but there were no references. With no evidence of a waitlist system in the remarks, this is treated as not indicated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 13 current listings show CONCRE in the MLS construction_materials field, giving very strong building-level evidence that 1111 Wilder is concrete construction. The public remarks are silent on structure type, so there is no conflicting evidence. This appears to be a consistent MLS attribute rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental language, including STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC, TVU, and similar terms, but found nothing. The remarks do not provide evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel pool references such as Hilton pool, Ritz pool, hotel rental program, or managed-by-hotel language, but found none. Because STR allowance itself is not evidenced, this is also false.
I searched for wording like mandatory pool, required rental program, or cannot opt out, but found no such references. There is also no evidence of an STR or hotel-pool setup in the remarks, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for land lease, leasehold, ground lease, lease expiry, and renewal language, but nothing in the remarks states a lease expiration year. Since no specific year is provided, this remains unknown.
The public remarks repeatedly advertise VA loan assumption opportunities, which is strong evidence that VA financing is accepted or supported for this building. I found several explicit references to VA assumable loans with balances and interest rates, so this is high confidence.
I searched the remarks for wording about full building insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive HOA insurance, but found none. The listings discuss amenities, privacy, and building security, yet do not address insurance coverage. Because there is no direct evidence, this remains unknown.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit evidence that the building had passed fire/life safety evaluation, such as 'FLSE passed,' 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' or 'passed fire inspection.' Instead, the only related remark says the AOAO is starting a process to upgrade systems and that it is still subject to approval. That suggests the evaluation has not been confirmed as passed in the remarks, so I mark it false with moderate-high confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are consistently advertised across the building, with numerous listings explicitly calling out "mountain views," "lush mountain views," "stunning panoramic views," and "Koolau/mauka-style" mountain-oriented outlooks. The current MLS pattern is also strong (9/13 with MOUNTA), so this appears to be a real building-level feature rather than copy-paste noise.
Diamond Head is mentioned explicitly in multiple remarks (phrases include 'peek-a-boo glimpse of iconic Diamond Head' and 'distant Diamond Head views'), and 2 of 11 MLS view entries list DIAHEA. While not universal across all listings, consistent explicit mentions by different agents indicate some units/lanai views include Diamond Head.
City views are repeatedly marketed in the listings, including phrases like "beautiful mountain and city views," "Honolulu city lights by night," "city skyline views," and "sweeping mountain and city views." Current MLS data is consistent as well (9/13 with CITY), so this feature is highly reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Cemetery views appear in a minority of current MLS entries (5/13 with CEMETA), but none of the public remarks explicitly confirm or describe them. Because buyers searching for this view would still care if any units offer it, it is reasonable to keep as a possible building-level view feature, but with moderate confidence only.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.