1111 Wilder
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1111 Wilder
Building Overview
1111 Wilder in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building (1970) with pool, split A/C, and assigned parking.
About 1111 Wilder
1111 Wilder is a condominium property located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1970 and is of concrete construction. Unit size, number of floors, and other building dimensions are not provided in the MLS data.
Key on-site features include a pool for residents and split air conditioning in units where noted. Pets are allowed at this property per the MLS information. No short-term rentals are permitted according to the available data.
Parking is available and assigned. The MLS listing indicates the management company is unknown. Based on MLS data and analysis; buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit percentage or descriptive statements about owner-occupancy but only found references to 'only two units per floor' (privacy) rather than owner vs. renter composition. With no explicit owner-occupancy figure in the remarks, the percentage is unknown and cannot be inferred.
I searched the public remarks for explicit references to number of elevators (phrases like '4 elevators', 'elevator(s)', 'multiple elevators') and found none. Without an explicit numeric statement in the remarks, I cannot assign a number and will not guess.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although 10/11 current MLS entries include OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, none of the public remarks for this building mention common area electricity or building power being included. The MLS prevalence looks like copy/paste across agent listings; lacking explicit agent remarks or owner verification, evidence is weak, so common-area electricity is omitted (confidence 0.75).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkboxes show HOTWAT on 7 of 11 listings, but none of the public remarks state 'hot water included' and one listing includes WTRHTR (water heater) implying unit-supplied hot water. Given the absence of explicit mention across multiple agent remarks and mixed MLS indicators, hot water being included is not supported (confidence 0.72).
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current MLS entries show SEWER checked on all 11 listings, but none of the public remarks for the building mention sewer being included in HOA/maintenance fees. The uniform MLS checkbox pattern appears to be agent copy/paste without corroborating remarks, so sewer inclusion is not supported by the public remarks (confidence 0.75).
While WATER is checked in all 11 MLS association_fee_includes entries, none of the public remarks for the building explicitly state that water is included in the maintenance fees. The consistent MLS checkbox may reflect copy/paste; without explicit remarks or verification, water inclusion is not confirmed (confidence 0.75).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of 11 current MLS listings include the TRACHU amenity, but none of the aggregated public remarks mention a trash/garbage/refuse chute. Because there is only checkbox-level support from a minority of listings and no remarks confirming installation or use, the feature is possible but unconfirmed across the building; confidence is low (0.30).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 11 current MLS listings have pool amenities checked and at least 6 separate public-remarks sections explicitly reference a pool (quotes include 'sparkling swimming pool', 'community pool', and 'building ... features a pool'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and matches the MLS checkbox data, so high confidence the building has a swimming pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All current MLS listings (11/11) list WASHER/DRYER in the inclusions, and multiple agents' remarks explicitly state 'in-unit washer/dryer', 'in-unit laundry', or 'washer and dryer in unit'. Evidence is consistent across several remark blocks and aligns with the MLS checkbox, indicating strong confidence that some units in the building have in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: current MLS data lists ASSIGN on 9 of 11 listings, and many agent remarks explicitly state 'assigned parking stall', 'one reserved parking stall', or 'deeded parking'. Mentions appear repeatedly across different remarks/agents (e.g., 'assigned parking stall', 'one reserved parking stall', 'deeded parking'), indicating this is a building-level feature rather than a copy/paste error.
Evidence supports covered parking being available: MLS flags COVERE/CO1/CO2/GARAGE on 5 of 11 listings and multiple remarks state '1 covered parking', '1 covered parking stall', or 'covered, close to entrance for convenience'. These consistent, explicit mentions across listings indicate covered parking is offered.
Multiple listings consistently state the unit includes an assigned/deeded/reserved parking stall, supporting a high-confidence determination that parking is deeded with the unit.
No analysis available
Searched for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental' or dollar amounts for parking; none were found. Because parking is described as included/deeded, no separate fee is mentioned.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar language; absent from remarks. Given assigned/deeded parking statements and no waitlist language, it's likely no waitlist system is referenced.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although the MLS construction_materials field is checked as CONCRE in all 11 current listings, none of the public remarks mention concrete construction, reinforced concrete, or related terms. With no historical confirmation and identical checkbox data across many listings (likely copy/paste), the evidence indicates the concrete construction flag is unverified and likely erroneous, so the feature is omitted pending direct verification from an owner/manager or site visit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for 'short-term rental', 'STR', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', 'NUC', or minimum day limits; none were found. In absence of STR-related statements, STR allowance is not indicated.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or hotel brand management mentions; none were found. Because STR is not indicated as allowed, hotel-pool participation is set false.
No remarks reference any mandatory hotel pool or required rental program; in the absence of STR program language, mandatory pool participation is not supported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring in' or specific years; no leasehold or lease expiry year is referenced in any public remark.
Public remarks repeatedly advertise VA loan assumption options and specific terms across multiple entries, indicating the building/unit is VA loan approved and offers assumable VA financing for eligible veterans.
I reviewed the remarks for statements that the HOA fully insures the building (walls-in coverage or equivalent) and found none. Because there is no mention and no prior/current value, the default assessment is that fully insured is not indicated.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit language indicating a passed FLSE (e.g., 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection') but found no such statement. The remarks mention the AOAO initiating work to retrofit pipes and install a fire alarm system, which suggests upgrades are pending rather than that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are consistently advertised across multiple listings (at least 4 of 11 MLS entries) and the public remarks repeatedly state phrases like 'mountain views', 'mauka vistas', and 'panoramic mountain views'. Evidence comes from several agent remarks across listings rather than a single copy/paste entry, supporting high confidence that the building offers mountain views.
Diamond Head is mentioned explicitly in multiple remarks (phrases include 'peek-a-boo glimpse of iconic Diamond Head' and 'distant Diamond Head views'), and 2 of 11 MLS view entries list DIAHEA. While not universal across all listings, consistent explicit mentions by different agents indicate some units/lanai views include Diamond Head.
City views are repeatedly called out in the remarks (e.g., 'city views', 'city skyline views', 'Honolulu city lights by night') across several listings, and MLS data lists CITY for multiple entries. The recurring explicit mentions across agent remarks provide strong evidence that the building offers city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.