1011 Prospect
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1011 Prospect
Building Overview
1011 Prospect in Makiki-Tantalus; concrete building (1972) with mountain views and assigned parking.
About 1011 Prospect
1011 Prospect is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1972. The building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit-specific square footage are not provided in the available MLS data.
Key features noted in the MLS include mountain views. No additional amenities (such as pool, fitness center, or common areas) are listed in the provided records.
According to available records, parking is assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown and maintenance or HOA fee details are not provided. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, policies, fees, and availability with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The text was reviewed for phrases such as 'X% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', or 'highly owner occupied' and none were found. A single unit being owner-occupied does not provide a building-wide percentage, so the owner_occupancy value remains unknown (null).
The listings confirm the presence of an elevator in the building but never specify how many elevators there are (e.g., '2 elevators', 'three elevators'). Because the feature is a numeric count and no explicit number is given, the exact number of elevators remains unknown (null).
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 recent MLS listings for this building report OTCOEX (other common expenses) as part of the association fee, indicating common-area operating costs like shared electricity are included. Public remarks consistently reference “low maintenance fees” but do not itemize utilities, and there is no evidence suggesting common-area electricity is billed separately. The consistency across all listings and agents supports treating common-area electricity as included in the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Every one of the 9 MLS listings indicates that sewer is included in the association fees via the SEWER checkbox. Although the public remarks emphasize “low maintenance fees” rather than listing utilities, no listing or user verification suggests separate sewer billing. The uniform MLS checkbox data across multiple listings and agents strongly supports that sewer service is included in the maintenance fee.
All 9 MLS listings for this building mark WATER as included in the HOA/maintenance fees, with no conflicting data. While the remarks mainly highlight low maintenance fees and building features, they do not contradict the structured MLS data about water being included. The consistency across all current listings provides strong evidence that water is part of the association fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least three listings describe dedicated storage for the units, using terms like 'separate assigned storage' and 'outside storage on the same floor,' consistent with storage lockers. Combined with MLS checkbox data (storage marked in 2/9 amenities and 2/9 unit_features), this strongly supports that the building offers storage units/lockers to residents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Most recent MLS entries (6/9) mark parking as assigned, and one listing explicitly describes a 'dedicated parking space,' indicating reserved/deeded stalls. Several other remarks mention a specific stall count such as 'Covered Parking Stall' and '1 parking condominium,' which supports the pattern that units come with their own assigned parking rather than unassigned common parking. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
Searched for indications that parking is deeded or owned (e.g., deeded parking, owned stall, parking included in deed) and found none. References only confirm that a stall is included, not that it is deeded.
No analysis available
Looked for phrases like parking fee, monthly parking charge, or additional cost for parking but did not find any. It is unknown from the remarks whether there is a separate parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for terms such as parking waitlist or waiting list for parking and found nothing. This absence suggests there is no formal parking waitlist mentioned in public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across recent listings for this building, 8 of 9 units have the MLS construction_materials field set to CONCRE, with no remarks indicating a different structure type. Although the public remarks do not explicitly mention concrete construction, the strong MLS checkbox consistency and the building’s urban condo context support treating it as a concrete building. This appears to be a stable, building-wide characteristic rather than a listing-specific error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for language indicating STR permissions such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or nightly rental and found none, nor any hotel-style marketing. Based on this lack of evidence, STR is assumed not allowed from the available remarks.
Searched for references to hotel rental pools or hotel management (e.g., hotel rental program, managed by hotel) and found none. Combined with no evidence of STR, a hotel pool program is very unlikely based on the remarks.
Looked for phrases such as mandatory hotel pool, required to participate, or must be in rental program but found none. With no hotel pool mentioned at all, a mandatory pool can be ruled out from these remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like lease expires, land lease to, ground lease ends, or any leasehold expiry year but found none. The tenure type and any lease expiration year remain unknown from these remarks.
The remarks clearly state that the building is VA approved, indicating VA financing is accepted. This is direct evidence from the public remarks.
The public remarks do not reference HOA insurance coverage terms like 'fully insured' or 'walls-in coverage'. Without explicit confirmation of comprehensive building insurance, this field is set to false by default with medium confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks were checked for phrases such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', or 'fire safety certified' and none were present. In the absence of any reference to such an evaluation, this is set to false by default with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe mountain-facing aspects, including 'views of the green mountains', 'wrap around views of ocean to mountains', and a unit 'facing the Mauka side of the building with cool valley breezes'. Combined with 3/9 MLS view fields containing MOUNTA and only 1/9 showing NONE, this strongly indicates that some units in this building offer mountain views. Buyers seeking mountain views would reasonably consider this building.
No analysis available
One listing highlights 'sweeping views of the city, Diamond Head, and the stunning coastline', and MLS data supports this with CITY checked in 5 of 9 listings. The presence of only a single NONE entry suggests that while not every unit has a city view, the building clearly offers city-view units that buyers may seek out.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the available listings, 0/9 public remarks mention a resident or on-site manager, despite detailed discussion of building features like security, parking, storage, pets, and maintenance fees. Only 3/9 MLS entries have the RESMAN amenity checked, suggesting inconsistent data entry rather than a true building-wide service. Based on the lack of narrative confirmation and inconsistent checkbox use, it is very likely the building does not have a resident manager on-site.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.