1011 Prospect
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1011 Prospect
Building Overview
1011 Prospect in Makiki-Tantalus; concrete building (1972) with mountain views and assigned parking.
About 1011 Prospect
1011 Prospect is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1972. The building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit-specific square footage are not provided in the available MLS data.
Key features noted in the MLS include mountain views. No additional amenities (such as pool, fitness center, or common areas) are listed in the provided records.
According to available records, parking is assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown and maintenance or HOA fee details are not provided. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, policies, fees, and availability with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit percentages or phrases like '80% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied' and found none. While at least one unit is described as owner-occupied, there is no building-level percentage provided, so the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown.
Public remarks confirm the presence of at least one elevator in the building but never specify the number (e.g., '2 elevators' or 'four elevators'). I searched the remarks for numeric or written counts like '2 elevators', 'four elevators', or 'multiple elevators' and found none, so the exact number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 recent MLS listings for this building report OTCOEX (other common expenses) as part of the association fee, indicating common-area operating costs like shared electricity are included. Public remarks consistently reference “low maintenance fees” but do not itemize utilities, and there is no evidence suggesting common-area electricity is billed separately. The consistency across all listings and agents supports treating common-area electricity as included in the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Every one of the 9 MLS listings indicates that sewer is included in the association fees via the SEWER checkbox. Although the public remarks emphasize “low maintenance fees” rather than listing utilities, no listing or user verification suggests separate sewer billing. The uniform MLS checkbox data across multiple listings and agents strongly supports that sewer service is included in the maintenance fee.
All 10 current MLS listings for the building have the association_fee_includes field set to include 'WATER' (historically 9/9 as well). Public remarks do not explicitly state 'water included' (no remarks with phrases like 'water included' or 'water in HOA'), but the uniform MLS checkbox across multiple listings and prior high-confidence history strongly indicate water is included in the maintenance/HOA fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 10 current MLS listings includes the CRWSH amenity flag, and none of the public remarks (0/10) mention a car wash or any vehicle wash station. With no agent remarks describing installation or existence and no prior verification, the evidence for a building car wash is weak and likely a checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (at least 3 separate public-remark entries) explicitly reference building storage: phrases include 'separate assigned storage', 'assigned storage', and 'outside storage on the same floor measuring approx. 32" x 23" x 47"'. MLS checkboxes also show storage in 3 of 10 listings (amenities) and 2 of 10 (unit_features), so evidence is consistent across agents and supports that the building offers storage/lockers.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of 10 current MLS listings include the TRACHU amenity flag, but none of the public remarks (0/10) mention a trash chute, garbage chute, or refuse chute. Without any remarks or owner/manager verification and given common agent copy/paste issues, the evidence for a building trash chute is inconclusive and appears likely to be inconsistent checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that some units have in-unit laundry: at least 7 separate listing remarks explicitly mention in-unit washer/dryer (quotes include 'WASHER/DRYER in the unit', 'in-unit washer and dryer', 'Stack washer/dryer', 'Bosch ventless washer/dryer'). Current MLS checkbox data also shows 9/10 listings listing washer/dryer in inclusions, indicating this building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is supported by prior MLS data (7/10 listings marked ASSIGN) and confirmed in current remarks. Multiple listings state phrases like "a dedicated parking space", "1 parking condominium offers" and "one parking stall," indicating reserved/assigned parking across units rather than a single, atypical mention.
Covered parking is mentioned repeatedly in the public remarks with phrases like "COVERED parking stall" and "Covered parking and separate assigned storage." Several listings reference covered stalls or half-covered parking, showing the building offers covered parking options for units.
Listings reference 'covered parking stall', 'assigned storage', 'dedicated parking space', and 'one open parking stall', but there is no explicit mention of 'deeded parking', 'owned stall', or 'parking included in deed'. Therefore deeded parking is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
Searched for terms like 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental', or specific dollar amounts for parking; none were present. The presence or amount of a parking fee cannot be determined from the remarks.
Guest parking is strongly supported: seven MLS listings check guest parking and many remarks state "GUEST STALLS AVAILABLE," "lots of guest stalls," and "Ample guest parking." The evidence is consistent across several listings and agents, indicating on-site guest/visitor parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list for parking', or similar language; none appeared in the public remarks. Absence of mention suggests there is likely no formal waitlist noted in listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across recent MLS entries for this building, 9 of 10 listings list construction_materials as 'CONCRE', giving strong historical support for concrete construction. None of the public remarks across the provided listings mention a different construction type or a recent rebuild, and there is no user verification contradicting the MLS. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent listings, so the building is marked as concrete construction with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for explicit language about short-term rentals, nightly/vacation rentals, or 30-day minimums; the remarks do not address STR policy. With no evidence in the public remarks, STR allowance cannot be confirmed and is set to false with low-medium confidence.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', 'managed by hotel', or specific hotel brand pool references; none were found. Since STR is not indicated as allowed, hotel pool participation is set to false.
Searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or language about inability to opt out; none were found. With no STR/hotel pool evidence, mandatory pool participation is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'ground lease ends', or explicit years; none were found. No evidence the property is leasehold or any lease expiry year is provided.
Public remarks explicitly state the building is VA approved, indicating VA financing is accepted. This is direct evidence from the listing remarks.
I looked for phrases like 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage', or 'comprehensive building insurance' in the public remarks and found none. Because there is no explicit reference to full HOA insurance coverage, this is set to false with medium-low confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for phrases such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', and similar terms and found no references. With no explicit evidence in the remarks and no existing true value, the field is set to false with medium-low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Multiple unit remarks explicitly reference ocean/coastline views (3 listings: "stunning coastline", "Wrap around views of ocean to mountains", "parallel to the ocean"), and MLS checkboxes show OCEAN in 3/10 listings. Evidence is consistent across different listings and agents, supporting that the building offers ocean-view units.
Multiple listings describe mountain-facing aspects, including 'views of the green mountains', 'wrap around views of ocean to mountains', and a unit 'facing the Mauka side of the building with cool valley breezes'. Combined with 3/9 MLS view fields containing MOUNTA and only 1/9 showing NONE, this strongly indicates that some units in this building offer mountain views. Buyers seeking mountain views would reasonably consider this building.
Diamond Head is called out in multiple listings (notably "sweeping views... Diamond Head"), and MLS has DIAHEA checked in 3/10 listings. Multiple agent remarks corroborate that some units have Diamond Head views.
Strong, consistent evidence: many listings explicitly reference city/downtown views ("sweeping views of the city", "urban living", close to Downtown), and MLS has CITY checked in 7/10 listings. Historical high confidence plus current confirmations indicate the building offers city-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No unit remarks reference sunrise/morning sun/eastern exposure, and SUNRIS appears in only 1/10 MLS entries. With no corroborating agent remarks and no historical support, there is insufficient evidence that the building offers sunrise views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data indicates a resident/on-site manager (RESMAN checked in 4 of 10 listings) but none of the public remarks (0 of 9) mention 'resident manager', 'on-site manager', or similar phrasing. Evidence is mixed: checklist prevalence supports inclusion, while lack of any explicit remarks across agents suggests possible copy/paste—insufficient to confidently remove the feature without owner/manager verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.