1011 Prospect
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
1011 Prospect
Building Overview
1011 Prospect in Makiki-Tantalus; concrete building (1972) with mountain views and assigned parking.
About 1011 Prospect
1011 Prospect is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1972. The building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit-specific square footage are not provided in the available MLS data.
Key features noted in the MLS include mountain views. No additional amenities (such as pool, fitness center, or common areas) are listed in the provided records.
According to available records, parking is assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown and maintenance or HOA fee details are not provided. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, policies, fees, and availability with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit percentages or phrases such as '80% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied' and found none. One listing notes that a unit is owner occupied, but that is not enough to infer the building-wide owner-occupancy percentage.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator counts such as '2 elevators' or 'four elevators' and found none. The listings only indicate the building has at least one elevator, so the exact number cannot be determined from remarks alone.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence indicates common-area expenses are included: 10 of 11 MLS listings have OTCOEX checked. The remarks are consistent with a building that has shared operating costs built into maintenance fees, and there is no contrary evidence suggesting this checkbox is being used incorrectly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no MLS checkbox evidence for hot water inclusion, and a majority of listings instead show WTRHTR, pointing away from building-provided hot water. None of the public remarks mention hot water being included, so the best read is that this fee item is not part of maintenance.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion appears to be a stable building feature, with 10 of 11 MLS listings marked SEWER. The remarks across listings focus on unit condition and amenities, not utilities, which is consistent with the MLS checkbox being the reliable signal here.
Water inclusion is overwhelmingly supported: all 11 current MLS listings include WATER in the association fee. This is one of the clearest building-level features in the dataset, and the public remarks do not suggest any exception or recent change.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention a car wash facility, station, or vehicle wash area. Only 2 of 11 current MLS listings carry the CRWSH amenity flag, which is too sparse to support the feature with confidence and suggests possible copy-paste or checkbox noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is clearly supported across multiple listings. At least 3 remarks explicitly reference storage, including "separate assigned storage," "assigned storage," and "outside storage on the same floor," which aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS history. This looks like a consistent building feature rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Seven of 11 current MLS listings include the TRACHU amenity flag, while none of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash chute, garbage chute, or refuse chute. The evidence is moderate rather than explicit, but the majority of current MLS entries supports that the building offers a trash chute system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers in-unit laundry. At least 7 listings explicitly mention it with phrases like 'in-unit washer/dryer,' 'washer/dryer in the unit,' 'stack washer/dryer in the unit,' and 'Bosch ventless washer/dryer.' The repeated mentions across multiple remarks suggest this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listing remarks. Multiple agents describe it as an 'assigned parking stall,' 'dedicated parking space,' or a '1 parking condominium,' which aligns with the prior MLS data showing assigned parking in most listings. The repeated phrasing across several remarks suggests this is a real building-level feature, not a one-off copy-paste error.
Covered parking is well supported by both MLS history and public remarks. At least several listings explicitly mention a 'COVERED parking stall' or similar wording, indicating the building offers covered/garage-style parking in some units. The consistency across listings makes this a strong building feature.
The remarks mention assigned parking, covered parking, dedicated parking space, and one open stall, but they do not explicitly say the stall is deeded or owned with the unit. Without that exact language, deeded parking cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee, monthly parking charge, parking rental, or any dollar amount tied specifically to parking, but found none. The listings discuss included/assigned stalls, not a separate parking cost.
Guest parking is strongly confirmed. Several listings independently mention 'GUEST STALLS AVAILABLE,' 'lots of guest stalls,' or 'ample guest parking,' which matches the prior MLS pattern showing guest parking in most listings. This appears to be a genuine shared building amenity rather than a copied checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist or waiting-list language and found nothing. The listings instead describe assigned, covered, or open stalls and guest parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports concrete construction. Across the recent MLS set, 10 of 11 listings list construction_materials as CONCRE, and the earlier history was similarly consistent, suggesting this is not a copy-paste anomaly. No current remarks indicate a different construction type or a rebuild.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental language such as STR allowed, NUC, TVU, vacation rental, or 30-day minimum rules, but the remarks do not address the building's STR policy. With no affirmative evidence, STR allowance cannot be confirmed.
I looked for hotel rental pool, hotel-managed program, or brand-specific pool references and found none. Because the remarks do not establish STR eligibility either, hotel pool participation is not supported.
I searched for language indicating a required rental program, mandatory participation, or inability to opt out, but found nothing. With no evidence of STR or a hotel pool program, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiry years, ground lease end dates, or renewal terms, but found none. There is no public-remark evidence to identify a lease expiry year.
Public remarks explicitly state the building is VA approved, which indicates VA financing is accepted. This is direct evidence from the listing text and does not rely on inference.
I looked for public remark references to full HOA insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance and found none. The listings do not provide evidence that the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' 'FLSE passed,' and similar safety-certification wording, but found nothing. With no public remark evidence, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not indicated in the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Multiple unit remarks explicitly reference ocean/coastline views (3 listings: "stunning coastline", "Wrap around views of ocean to mountains", "parallel to the ocean"), and MLS checkboxes show OCEAN in 3/10 listings. Evidence is consistent across different listings and agents, supporting that the building offers ocean-view units.
Strong building-level evidence for mountain views. Multiple listings explicitly mention "views of the mountains," "Facing the Mauka side," and "view of the green mountains," indicating this is not a one-off agent error. The remarks are consistent across several units and clearly show mountain-view inventory in the building.
Diamond Head is called out in multiple listings (notably "sweeping views... Diamond Head"), and MLS has DIAHEA checked in 3/10 listings. Multiple agent remarks corroborate that some units have Diamond Head views.
Strong evidence that the building offers city views. Several remarks explicitly reference "sweeping views of the city" and one unit with "views of the mountains and city," which supports this as a building feature available in some units. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings rather than appearing as isolated copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No unit remarks reference sunrise/morning sun/eastern exposure, and SUNRIS appears in only 1/10 MLS entries. With no corroborating agent remarks and no historical support, there is insufficient evidence that the building offers sunrise views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is indicated by MLS amenity data in 5 of 11 listings, but the public remarks do not mention a resident manager, on-site manager, or live-in manager. This looks like repeated MLS checkbox usage across listings rather than agent-written confirmation, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.